ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Ophthalmol.

Sec. Neuro-Ophthalmology Disorders

Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fopht.2025.1505836

This article is part of the Research TopicTelemedicine in Ophthalmology: Cost-Effectiveness and Barriers to Widespread Adoption.View all 3 articles

Persistent Visual Impairments following Mild-to-Moderate Ischemic Stroke

Provisionally accepted
  • 1La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
  • 2Department of Neurology, Sunshine Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
  • 3RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • 4Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka
  • 5Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Vision is rarely appraised either acutely or during recovery, following acute ischemic stroke. Our previous study found significant deficits in visual function after 2-3 days in ~ 68% of hospitalized mild-to-moderate acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with no comorbid eye disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate recovery in vision after 2-6 months in a subgroup of the original participants.Methods: Visual assessments were performed within the first week of admission and 2-6 months later. Testing was achieved on an iPad and included visual acuity (VA), VA-in-noise, visual field, visual neglect and time to complete an eye-hand coordination (EHC) task. All cases were radiologically confirmed and 10 had left hemisphere lesions. Outcomes were compared to twenty age matched healthy controls who were tested and retested over a similar duration using the same vision tests. Testing took 12 minutes.Results: During the first week of admission, 19/20, (95%) AIS patients returned normal visual acuity (>6/12 VA, p=0.11) yet 11/20 (55%) had reduced VA-in-noise (p<0.000).Visual neglect was present in 2/20 cases. Visual field defects were present in 16/20 (80%, p<0.001) with 7/16 (44%) being unaware of their visual field loss. All patients chose to use their dominant right hand despite 10 having left hemisphere lesions and 13/20 (65%, p<0.001) returning longer times to complete the EHC tracing tasks. After 2-6 months of recovery, all stroke patients returned normal visual attention, normal VA although 3/20 (15%) continued to show reduced VA in the presence of noise masks. Seven/20 (35%) retained visual field defects and 8/20 (40%, 3 right and 5 left hemisphere lesions) had visuomotor impairment. Posterior circulation territory strokes and left hemisphere lesions were more likely to result in a persistent visual field loss and visuomotor deficit.Conclusion: Given that stroke is the leading cause of neurological disability affecting over 110 million people, our findings highlight the necessity for both acute and longitudinal vision assessments subsequent to mild stroke. Exposing the persistent limitations in visual functions could aid identifying suitability for driving and the visuomotor rehabilitation of stroke survivors.

Keywords: Acute ischemic stroke, eye-hand coordination, Visual Field, Visual acuity-innoise, Vision, Visuomotor function, Melbourne Rapid Field-Neural (MRFn), UNSW Lee-Ryan Eye-Hand Coordination Test (SLURP)

Received: 03 Oct 2024; Accepted: 21 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wijesundera, Crewther, Wijeratne and Vingrys. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Sheila Gillard Crewther, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.