ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Photobiol.

Sec. Light Reactions of Photosynthesis

Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphbi.2025.1623224

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancing Photobiology: Novel Theories and Applications by Early Career ScientistsView all articles

The role of protonation processes in the gradual formation of the lightadapted charge-separated state of Photosystem II

Provisionally accepted
Melinda  MagyarMelinda Magyar1*Gábor  SipkaGábor Sipka1Xiaojun  ChenXiaojun Chen2Xu  WangXu Wang2Guangye  HanGuangye Han2Jian-Ren  ShenJian-Ren Shen2,3Petar  H. LambrevPetar H. Lambrev1Győző  GarabGyőző Garab1,4
  • 1Institute of Plant Biology, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, Szeged, Hungary
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Photobiology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beiing, China
  • 3Research Institute for Interdisciplinary Science, and Graduate School of Environmental, Life, Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
  • 4Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Earlier, we discovered that to reach the maximum chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) fluorescence level of photosystem II (PSII) in diuron-treated samples, and thus PSIIL, the light-adapted charge-separated state, multiple excitations with sufficiently long Δτ waiting times between excitations are required. Experiments of Chl-a fluorescence, elicited by single-turnover saturating flashes (STSFs), revealed that the Δτ1/2 half-waiting times between flashes depended on the lipid content of the reaction centre (RC) and on the temperature. We hypothesized that the gradual formation of PSIIL depends on protonatable residues (and bound water molecules) at the donor side of the RC. Here, we tested this hypothesis: we used diuron-treated isolated PSII core complexes of Thermostichus vulcanus and determined the pH dependence of Δτ1/2 and other Chl-a fluorescence parameters at different temperatures. Data recorded at 5 °C revealed moderate and steep increases of Δτ1/2 between pH 5.0 and 6.5, and 6.5 and 8.0, respectively. Much weaker pH dependences were seen at cryogenic temperatures (-20 and -60 °C), indicating the role of structural plasticity in the protonation-dependent reorganizations. Similar to the strong pH dependence of Δτ1/2 at 5 °C, the magnitude of the F1 fluorescence level, induced by the first STSF, displayed moderate and steep increases between pH 5.0 and 6.5, and 6.5 and 8.0, respectively, at all temperatures. Corroborating data were received from fast Chl-a fluorescence transient measurements. Hence, our data provide experimental support to the hypothesized role of protonation processes in the formation of PSIIL. The protonophores, CCCP and FCCP significantly increased the Δτ1/2 at pH 6.0 and essentially eliminated the pH dependence of the F1 fluorescence level -substantiating our conclusion on the role of protonatable residues in determining the structural dynamics of PSII RCs.

Keywords: Chlorophyll-a fluorescence, core complex of photosystem II, protonation, ratelimiting step, structural dynamics, waiting time

Received: 05 May 2025; Accepted: 18 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Magyar, Sipka, Chen, Wang, Han, Shen, Lambrev and Garab. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Melinda Magyar, Institute of Plant Biology, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, Szeged, Hungary

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.