Cell therapy of periodontium: from animal to human?

Abstract

Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the soft and hard tissues supporting the teeth, which often leads to tooth loss. Its significant impact on the patient's general health and quality of life point to a need for more effective management of this condition. Existing treatments include scaling/root planning and surgical approaches but their overall effects are relatively modest and restricted in application. The goal of regenerative therapy of periodontal defects is to enhance endogenous progenitors and thus promote optimal wound healing. Considering that the host or tissue might be defective in the periodontitis context, it has been proposed that grafting exogenous stem cells would produce new tissues and create a suitable microenvironment for tissue regeneration. Thus, cell therapy of periodontium has been assessed in many animal models and promising results have been reported. However, the methodological diversity of these studies makes the conversion to clinical practice difficult. The aim of this review is to highlight the primary requirements to be satisfied before the leap to clinical trials can be made. We therefore review cell therapy applications for periodontal regeneration in animal models and the concerns to be addressed before undertaking human experiments.

Introduction

Periodontitis is an immuno-infectious disease, characterized by loss of both the soft and hard tissues anchoring the teeth. Left untreated, it leads to tooth loss (Pihlstrom et al., 2005). Chronic periodontitis is found in 15–50% of adults in developed countries (Oliver et al., 1998; Bourgeois et al., 2005). Conventional treatment, including oral hygiene instructions, and scaling/root planing, aims to prevent the disease, or slow or stop its progress, and maintain the therapeutic goals achieved but is usually insufficient to promote the regeneration of damaged structures (Bosshardt and Sculean, 2009). Deep infrabony defects associated with periodontal pockets are the classic indication for surgical periodontal regenerative therapy (Ramseier et al., 2012). Nevertheless, outcomes of existing procedures [guided tissue regeneration (GTR), Enamel-Matrix Derivatives (EMD) or Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP)], are not predictable and are associated with a relatively high degree of variability (Needleman et al., 2006; Esposito et al., 2009).

The regenerative mechanisms of mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) grafts include direct commitment toward differentiating cells together with paracrine communication with resident connective cells, and infiltration of inflammatory cells, antigen-presenting cells, or both (Sorrell and Caplan, 2010). Paracrine interactions require these cells to produce and respond to a variety of trophic factors that may stimulate the resident cells to differentiate and themselves renew the pathological tissue (Baraniak and McDevitt, 2010). In addition, MSCs also exhibit immuno-modulatory functions, making them a potential tool to combat an immuno-infectious disease such as periodontitis. The reduction of inflammation by MSCs may halt the development of injury and allow regenerative processes to take place (Sensebe et al., 2010). Furthermore, MSCs may exert a neovascularization effect (Wu et al., 2007). Thus, one of the therapeutic functions of MSCs is the early induction of granulation tissue followed by the stabilization of the neovascular network in the periodontal niche (Sorrell and Caplan, 2010).

The graft of exogenous cells producing new tissues and/or making the local microenvironment suitable for an optimal activation of in-situ progenitors (Ilic and Polak, 2012; Shin and Peterson, 2013) has been tested in many models. Adult multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells, from bone marrow (BMSCs) or adipose tissue (adipose-derived stem cells or ASCs), are promising in the treatment of human diseases like graft-vs-host disease, ischemic cardiovascular diseases or large bone defects (Bourin et al., 2010; Sensebe et al., 2010). The main features of such cells include a capacity to self-renew and to undergo extensive proliferation and differentiation to various mesenchymal lineages (Dominici et al., 2006). Considering that the host or tissue might be defective in the periodontitis context, grafting exogenous MSCs that produce new tissues and create a suitable microenvironment for tissue regeneration has been proposed (Chen et al., 2012a). However, the methodological diversity of the available studies makes the conversion to clinical practice difficult. The aim of this review is, first, to report recent findings of periodontal regeneration in animal models and, second, to highlight the primary requirements to be satisfied before the leap to clinical trials can be made.

Results from animal studies

Advances in mesenchymal stem cell isolation, growth factor biology, and biodegradable polymer constructs have set the stage for successful tissue engineering of the periodontium, basically in animal models. Our screening of the literature revealed that data were available for about fifty studies. The majority of them concerned periodontal defects generated mechanically (burs) on dogs and rodents. Except for nude rodents where xenogeneic cells were used, most studies used autologous cell grafts. Periodontal ligament stromal cells (PDLSCs) were employed in about half the studies.

Table 1 outlines the general methodology from recent papers investigating periodontal regeneration of various defect models in a range of large animals. These studies were selected both for their methodological quality and to reflect the heterogeneity of methodologies used. We voluntarily did not select studies on rodents because of the low similarity between their physiopathology and that of humans, although they are considered as essential models for preliminary protocols before moving on to large-animal trials. Overall, the outcomes reported (Table 2) suggest that MSCs have the ability to enhance the regeneration of functional periodontal apparatus: newly formed bone and cementum with well-oriented ligament fibers.

Results from human studies

We identified 7 case reports (for a total of 22 patients) where MSCs had been applied clinically for infra-bony defects and furcation involvement after chronic periodontitis in humans. The efficacy of human periodontal cell therapy by grafting autologous stromal cells from gingiva or periodontal ligament with a hydroxyapatite (HA) carrier has been assessed since 1992 (Feng and Hou, 1992; Feng et al., 1995, 2010; Hou et al., 2003). Cultured mandibular periosteum-derived cell sheets with PRP have also been used in the treatment of chronic periodontitis without (Mizuno et al., 2010) or with HA in patients suffering from advanced chronic periodontitis (Okuda et al., 2009). A BMSC-PRP gel has also been used in an infrabony periodontal defect and led to a 4 mm clinical attachment gain (Yamada et al., 2006). Results suggest promising improvements in pocket depth, attachment gain and tooth mobility, compared to control groups when present. These data suggest MSCs may induce efficient and safe periodontal regeneration in humans.

Through the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (World Health Organization), we identified four clinical studies (last access 2013/08/27): two single-arm studies using (i) ASCs for 12 patients with deep infra-bony defects (recruiting) and (ii) a mixture of ex-vivo cultured MSCs and ex-vivo cultured osteoblast-like cells differentiated from MSCs for 10 patients with chronic periodontitis (completed); and two trials investigating the safety and efficacy of PDLSCs in chronic periodontitis, one randomized and one non-randomized controlled trial, with respectively 35 and 80 patients (recruiting).

Nevertheless, results from case reports and clinical trials should be interpreted with caution. Although the clinical potential of MSCs in tissue regeneration appears to be established, the mechanisms involved in these processes after transplantation are not clearly understood (Chen et al., 2012b; Hoogduijn and Dor, 2013). Moreover, the clinical indications in periodontology remain be defined (Chen and Jin, 2010); the multiplicity of factors to be taken into account makes the regeneration equation more complex. Future studies should discuss regeneration according to the type of periodontal defects (number of walls), the type of periodontitis (chronic, aggressive) or the method used to generate the periodontitis model in animals, whether the MSCs are autologous, allogeneic or xenogeneic, the type of animal (dog, pig), the source tissue of MSCs (dental, oral, or extra-oral sources), the scaffold used, adjunctive growth factors or specific culture medium, etc.

Key elements to consider before making the step to clinical trials

The transfer of pre-clinical data to the clinical setting could be challenging and time consuming. So we will discuss some elements related to the choice of the origin of MSCs, their potential toxicity and their carrier, some laboratory considerations, the extent to which animal models reflect the applicability of the technique in humans, and regulatory information.

Cell sources

One of the most important items of information that could help with the predictability of clinical results is the type of cell used. On the one hand, each tissue source has its own biological features and, even when they have common surface markers, these cells are determined by their original environment and may possibly be involved in specific differentiation pathways (Lin et al., 2009). On the other hand, the local microenvironment and surrounding tissue are important factors that influence the cell fate of whatever cells are ultimately used (Chen et al., 2011).

As stated above, PDLSCs are the cells most used for clinical trials, probably because of their periodontal origin and promising results in both animal and human trials (Feng et al., 2010; Suaid et al., 2012). Even if the choice of stromal cells from the oral niche (pulp, ligament, gingiva or oral alveolar bone) seems rational when the aim is to regenerate periodontal structures (Lin et al., 2009), periodontitis defects need a large number of cells (about 10⁷ cells are needed for one defect), which would be impossible to obtain from a single subject. Thus, the respect of ethical considerations (e.g., putative removal of healthy teeth, increasing genetic instability through passages during cellular expansion) requires other sources of MSCs to be sought.

Two major locations of available MSCs are long-bone marrow and adipose tissue. These cells are morphologically and immunophenotypically similar to PDLSCs (Huang et al., 2009). Unlike BMSCs, ASCs can be recovered easily in large numbers by means of liposuction under local anesthesia. Indeed, adipose tissue is the richest source of MSCs, 100 times more than bone marrow (Bourin et al., 2010). Although ASCs may exhibit a reduced ability to differentiate into bone and cartilage (Kern et al., 2006) compared to BMSC or oral mesenchymal cells, they have given promising results in periodontal regeneration in dogs (Takedachi et al., 2013; Tobita et al., 2013).

The need for high cell concentrations requires the optimal type of transplant to be determined. To become a clinical reality, xenografts need to overcome immunological, physiological, and infectious obstacles (Poncelet et al., 2009). For example, the donor might be genetically modified to protect its cells from the human immune system (Li et al., 2012). MSCs are both immunosuppressive and immunoprivileged and, as such, may be used as an allogeneic source of cells. A recent randomized controlled trial showed significant benefits and low rates of immunologic reactions for transendocardial injection of allogenic BMSCs in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (Hare et al., 2012). Another limitation is the time required to produce the MSCs. Cell storage may be used to provide enough material at the time of graft. In a beagle dog, cryopreservation of BMSCs did not alter the periodontal regeneration compared to the use of non-stored cells (Li et al., 2009). However, additional studies are required to ensure the safety of allogenic grafts and cell cryopreservation.

Adverse effects

With population doublings during the expansion stage, MSCs may be subject to senescence and genetic instability. Progressive shortening of telomeres, modified telomeric structures, and activation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) or p53 pathways have been demonstrated to be important triggers for replicative senescence (Schellenberg et al., 2011). Basically, the role of MSCs in cancer can be divided into indirect involvement via the tumor modulatory effect and direct involvement via malignant transformation of themselves (Wong, 2011). The “homing” effect allows MSCs to migrate toward tumor cells, interact with the stroma, and enhance its growth (Wong, 2011). Also, it can lead to malignant transformation of MSCs at the tumor site. While the immunosuppressive properties of MSCs are a good tool for immune disorders, a suppressed immune system may encourage tumor growth in patients with cancer (Shinagawa et al., 2010). To date, no malignant formation has been reported during the course of clinical studies involving periodontal cell therapies (Giordano et al., 2007; Yoshida et al., 2012). Moreover, PDLSC did not induce tumorigenesis after injection into immunodeficient mice for at least 12 weeks (Washio et al., 2010). However, improvements in the understanding of genetic and epigenetic changes will enable researchers to address the risk of tumorigenesis in the context of each type of cell transplantation therapy.

Cell culture during laboratory phases

The definition of MSCs as advanced-therapy medicinal products in European regulations and the US Food and Drug Administration requirements implies the use of production processes in accordance with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs). Requirements concern the environment, staff training and qualification, and controls (Sensebe et al., 2013). Culture conditions are not sufficiently developed to mimic the in-vivo cell microenvironment and to ensure that cell proliferation and differentiation can be performed safely (van der Sanden et al., 2010).

Cell culture status, such as culture medium composition and oxygen supply, may interact with MSC expansion and ex-vivo properties. Even though they are extensively described in studies, there is no consensus about the required culture conditions. Nevertheless, fetal calf serum (FCS), often used as a supplement, contains a xenogeneic source of growth factors and may transmit animal pathogens (Bourin et al., 2010). Addition of human blood-derived products to replace FCS is secured by serologic and nuclear acid testing for blood-transmitted viruses. Human platelet lysate, a blood plasma enriched in platelet growth factors released by freezing-thawing cycles, may be used to produce clinical-grade, stem-cell-loaded biomaterials as an appropriate FCS substitute in line with clinically applicable practice (Warnke et al., 2013). Various other serum-free media based on mixtures of defined growth factors are also able to maintain the main phenotypic and functional characteristics of cultured MSCs (Chase et al., 2010) but are restricted to research purposes and require upgrading for clinical uses.

Use of carrier and growth factors

In the review of the literature on periodontal regeneration by MSCs, one of the most striking elements is the numerous carriers that have been used. Cortical bone particulates (Simsek et al., 2012), bovine bone (Fawzy El-Sayed et al., 2012), HA (Ding et al., 2010), polymers (Park et al., 2012), collagen (Suaid et al., 2011), hydrogel (Wei et al., 2010), gelatin (Yang et al., 2010), fibrinogen/thrombin (Hynes et al., 2013), PRP (Tobita et al., 2013), cells as sheets (Tsumanuma et al., 2011), alone or in combination, have been suggested to help cell grafting. The heterogeneity among study methodologies makes it difficult to compare them and to draw sound conclusions. Biomolecules, in particular growth factors, have been suggested for addition to scaffolds to enhance periodontal regeneration (Saito et al., 2009). It has been reported that modified MSCs overexpressing growth factors such as BMP-2 (Chen et al., 2008; Chung et al., 2011) or bFGF (Tan et al., 2009) could improve the healing of periodontal defects by maintaining a long-term release of these factors in situ (Ramseier et al., 2012).

Periodontitis models in animals

Non-human primates are similar to humans, with comparable periodontal tissue structures. However, most non-human primates used for research purposes are expensive and difficult to handle, and ethical restrictions apply to their exploitation (Struillou et al., 2010). The beagle is one of the most commonly used due to its size and its cooperative temperament (Haney et al., 1995; Struillou et al., 2010). Minipigs are also an alternative (Fawzy El-Sayed et al., 2012). However, animal models are unable to mimic some fundamental features: the spontaneous emergence of disease (even though some periodontal lesions can occur in aged animals, periodontal defects are mostly mechanically generated), genetic background, and risk factors (aggressive bacterial flora, occlusal overload, tobacco, prosthesis, systemic diseases of host, and donor, etc.). Overall, these features should be investigated when clinical trials are being designed and analyzed.

Regulatory information

The translation of a cell-based therapy from bench to bedside is challenging, in a regulatory framework involving multiple responsible authorities. Japan, Europe, and the United States have developed quality standards to regulate cell based therapies with Good Clinical Practice and GMP (Yoshida et al., 2012). In the USA, MSCs are considered in the context of “361 Human Cells, Tissues, or Cellular and Tissue-Based Products” (source: www.fda.gov). For European countries, the framework for human trials is fixed by regulation number 1394/2007 on advanced therapy medicinal products, in force since December 2008.

The clinical development plan should start with the submission of a clinical trial authorization application to the competent authority; clinical trials should be designed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of cells (George, 2011). It can be noted that, in 2006, the WHO stated that all clinical trials should be registered. Moreover, US federal law (Food and Drug Administration) recommends the registration of trials via clinicaltrials.gov to record key elements of study and basic results, and to report adverse events (Califf et al., 2012).

In first-in-man studies, specific safety endpoints may need to be defined to explore: cross-contamination in cases of allogeneic and xenogeneic graft, chromosomal stability, contamination with microorganisms, safety of engineering devices, stemness potential, functional characterization, and cell phenotype (Dittmar et al., 2010). Because of the risk-benefit balance in periodontal regeneration, emphasis should be placed on the safety of these therapeutics.

Conclusion

Animal studies suggest that mesenchymal stem cells are effective and safe for periodontal regeneration. Nevertheless, additional studies are needed to improve periodontal cell therapy regeneration and to decipher the biological mechanisms that are involved. For example, a recent study in dogs suggested that periodontal regeneration could be obtained with stem-cell conditioned medium, possibly thanks to multiple cytokines (Inukai et al., 2013). To materialize the translation of cell therapy from the laboratory to the dental chair a compromise, providing real benefits for patients, respecting biosafety requirements, available at affordable prices, covered by a social security system and sufficiently attractive to encourage industrial companies to invest in its development, is still required. It is possible that cell therapy will be implemented in clinical practice as a routine technique in the future.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

• 1

  AkizukiT.OdaS.KomakiM.TsuchiokaH.KawakatsuN.KikuchiA.et al. (2005). Application of periodontal ligament cell sheet for periodontal regeneration: a pilot study in beagle dogs. J. Periodontal. Res. 40, 245–251. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2005.00799.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  BaraniakP. R.McDevittT. C. (2010). Stem cell paracrine actions and tissue regeneration. Regen. Med. 5, 121–143. 10.2217/rme.09.74

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  BosshardtD. D.SculeanA. (2009). Does periodontal tissue regeneration really work?Periodontol. 200051, 208–219. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2009.00317.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  BourgeoisD.LlodraJ.NordbladA.PittsN. (2005). Health surveillance in Europe—a selection of essential oral health indicators, in Technical Report, European Global Oral Health Development Project (EGOHID), Lyon.

  • Google Scholar

• 5

  BourinP.SensebéL.Planat-BénardV.RoncalliJ.Bura-RivièreA.CasteillaL. (2010). Culture and use of mesenchymal stromal cells in phase I and II clinical trials. Stem Cells Int. 2010, 503593. 10.4061/2010/503593

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  CaliffR. M.ZarinD. A.KramerJ. M.ShermanR. E.AberleL. H.TasneemA. (2012). Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007-2010. JAMA307, 1838–1847. 10.1001/jama.2012.3424

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  ChaseL. G.LakshmipathyU.SolchagaL. A.RaoM. S.VemuriM. C. (2010). A novel serum-free medium for the expansion of human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 1, 8. 10.1186/scrt8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  ChenF. M.JinY. (2010). Periodontal tissue engineering and regeneration: current approaches and expanding opportunities. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 16, 219–255. 10.1089/ten.teb.2009.0562

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  ChenF. M.SunH. H.LuH.YuQ. (2012a). Stem cell-delivery therapeutics for periodontal tissue regeneration. Biomaterials33, 6320–6344. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.048

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  ChenJ. S.WongV. W.GurtnerG. C. (2012b). Therapeutic potential of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for cutaneous wound healing. Front. Immunol. 3:192. 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00192

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  ChenF. M.WuL. A.ZhangM.ZhangR.SunH. H. (2011). Homing of endogenous stem/progenitor cells for in situ tissue regeneration: promises, strategies, and translational perspectives. Biomaterials32, 3189–3209. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.032

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  ChenY. L.ChenP. K.JengL. B.HuangC. S.YangL. C.ChungH. Y.et al. (2008). Periodontal regeneration using ex vivo autologous stem cells engineered to express the BMP-2 gene: an alternative to alveolaplasty. Gene Ther. 15, 1469–1477. 10.1038/gt.2008.131

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  ChungV. H.ChenA. Y.KwanC. C.ChenP. K.ChangS. C. (2011). Mandibular alveolar bony defect repair using bone morphogenetic protein 2-expressing autologous mesenchymal stem cells. J. Craniofac. Surg. 22, 450–454. 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182077de9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  DingG.LiuY.WangW.WeiF.LiuD.FanZ.et al. (2010). Allogeneic periodontal ligament stem cell therapy for periodontitis in swine. Stem Cells28, 1829–1838. 10.1002/stem.512

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  DittmarK. E.SimannM.ZghoulN.SchönO.MeyringW.HannigH.et al. (2010). Quality of cell products: authenticity, identity, genomic stability and status of differentiation. Transfus. Med. Hemother. 37, 57–64. 10.1159/000284401

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  DominiciM.Le BlancK.MuellerI.Slaper-CortenbachI.MariniF.KrauseD.et al. (2006). Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. the international society for cellular therapy position statement. Cytotherapy8, 315–317. 10.1080/14653240600855905

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  EspositoM.GrusovinM. G.PapanikolaouN.CoulthardP.WorthingtonH. V. (2009). Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain(R)) for periodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 7:CD003875. 10.1002/14651858.CD003875.pub3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  Fawzy El-SayedK. M.ParisS.BeckerS. T.NeuschlM.De BuhrW.SalzerS.et al. (2012). Periodontal regeneration employing gingival margin-derived stem/progenitor cells: an animal study. J. Clin. Periodontol. 39, 861–870. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01904.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  FengF.AkiyamaK.LiuY.YamazaT.WangT. M.ChenJ. H.et al. (2010). Utility of PDL progenitors for in vivo tissue regeneration: a report of 3 cases. Oral Dis. 16, 20–28. 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01593.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  FengF.HouL. T. (1992). Treatment of osseous defects with fibroblast-coated hydroxylapatite particles. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 91, 1068–1074.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  FengF.LiuC. M.HsuW. C.HouL. T. (1995). Long-term effects of gingival fibroblast-coated hydroxylapatite graft on periodontal osseous defects. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 94, 494–498.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  GeorgeB. (2011). Regulations and guidelines governing stem cell based products: clinical considerations. Perspect. Clin. Res. 2, 94–99. 10.4103/2229-3485.83228

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  GiordanoA.GalderisiU.MarinoI. R. (2007). From the laboratory bench to the patient's bedside: an update on clinical trials with mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 211, 27–35. 10.1002/jcp.20959

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  HaneyJ. M.ZimmermanG. J.WikesjoU. M. (1995). Periodontal repair in dogs: evaluation of the natural disease model. J. Clin. Periodontol. 22, 208–213. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb00136.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  HareJ. M.FishmanJ. E.GerstenblithG.Difede VelazquezD. L.ZambranoJ. P.SuncionV. Y.et al. (2012). Comparison of allogeneic vs autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells delivered by transendocardial injection in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: the POSEIDON randomized trial. JAMA308, 2369–2379. 10.1001/jama.2012.25321

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  HasegawaN.KawaguchiH.HirachiA.TakedaK.MizunoN.NishimuraM.et al. (2006). Behavior of transplanted bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in periodontal defects. J. Periodontol. 77, 1003–1007. 10.1902/jop.2006.050341

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  HoogduijnM. J.DorF. J. (2013). Mesenchymal stem cells: are we ready for clinical application in transplantation and tissue regeneration?Front. Immunol. 4:144. 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00144

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  HouL. T.TsaiA. Y.LiuC. M.FengF. (2003). Autologous transplantation of gingival fibroblast-like cells and a hydroxylapatite complex graft in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects: cell cultivation and long-term report of cases. Cell Transplant. 12, 787–797. 10.3727/000000003108747262

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  HuangG. T.GronthosS.ShiS. (2009). Mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental tissues vs. those from other sources: their biology and role in regenerative medicine. J. Dent. Res. 88, 792–806. 10.1177/0022034509340867

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  HynesK.MenicaninD.HanJ.MarinoV.MrozikK.GronthosS.et al. (2013). Mesenchymal stem cells from iPS cells facilitate periodontal regeneration. J. Dent. Res. 92, 833–839. 10.1177/0022034513498258

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  IlicD.PolakJ. (2012). Stem cell based therapy–where are we going?Lancet379, 877–878. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60155-X

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  InukaiT.KatagiriW.YoshimiR.OsugiM.KawaiT.HibiH.et al. (2013). Novel application of stem cell-derived factors for periodontal regeneration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 430, 763–768. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.11.074

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  IwataT.YamatoM.TsuchiokaH.TakagiR.MukobataS.WashioK.et al. (2009). Periodontal regeneration with multi-layered periodontal ligament-derived cell sheets in a canine model. Biomaterials30, 2716–2723. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.032

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  KernS.EichlerH.StoeveJ.KluterH.BiebackK. (2006). Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells24, 1294–1301. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0342

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  LiH.YanF.LeiL.LiY.XiaoY. (2009). Application of autologous cryopreserved bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for periodontal regeneration in dogs. Cells Tissues Organs190, 94–101. 10.1159/000166547

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  LiJ.EzzelarabM. B.CooperD. K. (2012). Do mesenchymal stem cells function across species barriers? Relevance for xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation19, 273–285. 10.1111/xen.12000

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  LinN. H.GronthosS.Mark BartoldP. (2009). Stem cells and future periodontal regeneration. Periodontol. 200051, 239–251. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2009.00303.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  LiuY.ZhengY.DingG.FangD.ZhangC.BartoldP. M.et al. (2008). Periodontal ligament stem cell-mediated treatment for periodontitis in miniature swine. Stem Cells26, 1065–1073. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0734

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  MizunoH.KagamiH.MaseJ.MizunoD.UedaM. (2010). Efficacy of membranous cultured periosteum for the treatment of patients with severe periodontitis: a proof-of-concept study. Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 72, 59–70.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  NeedlemanI. G.WorthingtonH. V.Giedrys-LeeperE.TuckerR. J. (2006). Guided tissue regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 19:CD001724. 10.1002/14651858.CD001724.pub2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  NunezJ.Sanz-BlascoS.VignolettiF.MunozF.ArzateH.VillalobosC.et al. (2012). Periodontal regeneration following implantation of cementum and periodontal ligament-derived cells. J. Periodontal. Res. 47, 33–44. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2011.01402.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  OkudaK.YamamiyaK.KawaseT.MizunoH.UedaM.YoshieH. (2009). Treatment of human infrabony periodontal defects by grafting human cultured periosteum sheets combined with platelet-rich plasma and porous hydroxyapatite granules: case series. J. Int. Acad. Periodontol. 11, 206–213.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  OliverR. C.BrownL. J.LoeH. (1998). Periodontal diseases in the United States population. J. Periodontol. 69, 269–278. 10.1902/jop.1998.69.2.269

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  ParkC. H.RiosH. F.JinQ.SugaiJ. V.Padial-MolinaM.TautA. D.et al. (2012). Tissue engineering bone-ligament complexes using fiber-guiding scaffolds. Biomaterials33, 137–145. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.057

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  ParkJ. Y.JeonS. H.ChoungP. H. (2011). Efficacy of periodontal stem cell transplantation in the treatment of advanced periodontitis. Cell Transplant. 20, 271–285. 10.3727/096368910X519292

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  PihlstromB. L.MichalowiczB. S.JohnsonN. W. (2005). Periodontal diseases. Lancet366, 1809–1820. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67728-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  PonceletA. J.DenisD.GianelloP. (2009). Cellular xenotransplantation. Curr. Opin. Organ Transplant. 14, 168–174. 10.1097/MOT.0b013e3283292522

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  RamseierC. A.RasperiniG.BatiaS.GiannobileW. V. (2012). Advanced reconstructive technologies for periodontal tissue repair. Periodontol. 200059, 185–202. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2011.00432.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  SaitoA.SaitoE.HandaR.HonmaY.KawanamiM. (2009). Influence of residual bone on recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2-induced periodontal regeneration in experimental periodontitis in dogs. J. Periodontol. 80, 961–968. 10.1902/jop.2009.080568

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  SchellenbergA.LinQ.SchulerH.KochC. M.JoussenS.DeneckeB.et al. (2011). Replicative senescence of mesenchymal stem cells causes DNA-methylation changes which correlate with repressive histone marks. Aging (Albany NY)3, 873–888.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  SensebeL.GadelorgeM.Fleury-CappellessoS. (2013). Production of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells according to good manufacturing practices: a review. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 4, 66. 10.1186/scrt217

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  SensebeL.KramperaM.SchrezenmeierH.BourinP.GiordanoR. (2010). Mesenchymal stem cells for clinical application. Vox Sang. 98, 93–107. 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01227.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  ShinL.PetersonD. A. (2013). Human mesenchymal stem cell grafts enhance normal and impaired wound healing by recruiting existing endogenous tissue stem/progenitor cells. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2, 33–42. 10.5966/sctm.2012-0041

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  ShinagawaK.KitadaiY.TanakaM.SumidaT.KodamaM.HigashiY.et al. (2010). Mesenchymal stem cells enhance growth and metastasis of colon cancer. Int. J. Cancer127, 2323–2333. 10.1002/ijc.25440

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  SimsekS. B.KelesG. C.BarisS.CetinkayaB. O. (2012). Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells and autogenous cortical bone graft in the treatment of class II furcation defects in dogs. Clin. Oral Investig. 16, 251–258. 10.1007/s00784-010-0486-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  SorrellJ. M.CaplanA. I. (2010). Topical delivery of mesenchymal stem cells and their function in wounds. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 1, 30. 10.1186/scrt30

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  StruillouX.BoutignyH.SoueidanA.LayrolleP. (2010). Experimental animal models in periodontology: a review. Open Dent. J. 4, 37–47. 10.2174/1874210601004010037

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  SuaidF. F.RibeiroF. V.GomesT. R.SilverioK. G.CarvalhoM. D.NocitiF. H.Jr.et al. (2012). Autologous periodontal ligament cells in the treatment of Class III furcation defects: a study in dogs. J. Clin. Periodontol. 39, 377–384. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01858.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  SuaidF. F.RibeiroF. V.RodriguesT. L.SilverioK. G.CarvalhoM. D.NocitiF. H.et al. (2011). Autologous periodontal ligament cells in the treatment of class II furcation defects: a study in dogs. J. Clin. Periodontol. 38, 491–498. 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01715.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  TakedachiM.SawadaK.YamamotoS.OzasaM.ShimabukuroY.KitamuraM.et al. (2013). Periodontal tissue regeneration by transplantation of adipose tissue-derived stem cells. J. Oral Biosci. 55, 137–142. 10.1016/j.job.2013.04.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  TanZ.ZhaoQ.GongP.WuY.WeiN.YuanQ.et al. (2009). Research on promoting periodontal regeneration with human basic fibroblast growth factor-modified bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cell gene therapy. Cytotherapy11, 317–325. 10.1080/14653240902824757

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  TobitaM.UysalC. A.GuoX.HyakusokuH.MizunoH. (2013). Periodontal tissue regeneration by combined implantation of adipose tissue-derived stem cells and platelet-rich plasma in a canine model. Cytotherapy [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.05.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  TsumanumaY.IwataT.WashioK.YoshidaT.YamadaA.TakagiR.et al. (2011). Comparison of different tissue-derived stem cell sheets for periodontal regeneration in a canine 1-wall defect model. Biomaterials32, 5819–5825. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.071

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  van der SandenB.DhobbM.BergerF.WionD. (2010). Optimizing stem cell culture. J. Cell. Biochem. 111, 801–807. 10.1002/jcb.22847

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  WarnkeP. H.HumpeA.StrunkD.StephensS.WarnkeF.WiltfangJ.et al. (2013). A clinically-feasible protocol for using human platelet lysate and mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative therapies. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 41, 153–161. 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.07.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  WashioK.IwataT.MizutaniM.AndoT.YamatoM.OkanoT.et al. (2010). Assessment of cell sheets derived from human periodontal ligament cells: a pre-clinical study. Cell Tissue Res. 341, 397–404. 10.1007/s00441-010-1009-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  WeiN.GongP.LiaoD.YangX.LiX.LiuY.et al. (2010). Auto-transplanted mesenchymal stromal cell fate in periodontal tissue of beagle dogs. Cytotherapy12, 514–521. 10.3109/14653241003709702

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  WongR. S. (2011). Mesenchymal stem cells: angels or demons?J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011:459510. 10.1155/2011/459510

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  WuY.ChenL.ScottP. G.TredgetE. E. (2007). Mesenchymal stem cells enhance wound healing through differentiation and angiogenesis. Stem Cells25, 2648–2659. 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0226

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  YamadaY.UedaM.HibiH.BabaS. (2006). A novel approach to periodontal tissue regeneration with mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma using tissue engineering technology: a clinical case report. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 26, 363–369.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  YangY.RossiF. M.PutninsE. E. (2010). Periodontal regeneration using engineered bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells. Biomaterials31, 8574–8582. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.026

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  YoshidaT.WashioK.IwataT.OkanoT.IshikawaI. (2012). Current status and future development of cell transplantation therapy for periodontal tissue regeneration. Int. J. Dent. 2012, 307024. 10.1155/2012/307024

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar