Abstract
Digestive physiology is one of the bottlenecks of octopus aquaculture. Although, there are successful experimentally formulated feeds, knowledge of the digestive physiology of cephalopods is fragmented, and focused mainly on Octopus vulgaris. Considering that the digestive physiology could vary in tropical and sub-tropical species through temperature modulations of the digestive dynamics and nutritional requirements of different organisms, the present review was focused on the digestive physiology timing of Octopus maya and Octopus mimus, two promising aquaculture species living in tropical (22–30°C) and sub-tropical (15–24°C) ecosystems, respectively. We provide a detailed description of how soluble and complex nutrients are digested, absorbed, and assimilated in these species, describing the digestive process and providing insight into how the environment can modulate the digestion and final use of nutrients for these and presumably other octopus species. To date, research on these octopus species has demonstrated that soluble protein and other nutrients flow through the digestive tract to the digestive gland in a similar manner in both species. However, differences in the use of nutrients were noted: in O. mimus, lipids were mobilized faster than protein, while in O. maya, the inverse process was observed, suggesting that lipid mobilization in species that live in relatively colder environments occurs differently to those in tropical ecosystems. Those differences are related to the particular adaptations of animals to their habitat, and indicate that this knowledge is important when formulating feed for octopus species.
Introduction
For cephalopods, in particular for octopus, proteins are the main metabolic substrate characterized by a natural diet based mainly on crustaceans, molluscs, and fish (Alejo-Plata et al., ; Krstulovíc and Vrgoc, ; Estefanell et al., ). Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of crustaceans in octopus diets, showing that up to 19 crustaceans species can be found in the diet of wild Octopus vulgaris paralarvae (Roura et al., ). In recent years and due to Octopus maya and Octopus mimus reaching high market value, these species were identified as two strong candidates for marine aquaculture as they adapt well to captivity and can eat freeze-dried diets, allowing for their cultivation in ponds and tanks.
Thanks to physiological digestion research, a semi-moist paste based on squid and crab meat was recently developed as a successful diet for O. maya juveniles and adults (Martínez et al., ; Tercero-Iglesias et al., ). With this diet, wild females were successfully acclimated, and pre adults were grown until spawning. Although, the diet was based on the digestive capacity of juvenile octopus, it was successfully used to cultivate hatchlings until they reached 250 g body weight, as requested by the gourmet market (Rosas et al., ). Research in nutrition is frequently dedicated to formulating diets for cephalopod species. For wild sub-adults of O. vulgaris, it was recently demonstrated that dehydration of raw materials at temperatures lower than 60°C induced similar growth rates when compared to freeze dried ingredients (Rodriguez-González et al., ), indicating that protein characteristics are correlated with the digestive capacity of the animals. Although, there are many papers related to important ingredients (amino acids, lipids) for O. vulgaris feed (Cerezo-Valverde et al., ,, ; Estefanell et al., ; Querol et al., ; Hamdan et al., ; Rodriguez-González et al., ) there is a general lack of knowledge of the physiological processes involved during nutrient digestion in octopus species. Considering that protein digestion is a key aspect of cephalopod nutrition, the study of the process by which proteins (and other nutrients) are digested and assimilated will determine diet design (Martínez et al., ).
According to Boucher-Rodoni et al. (), cephalopod digestion can be divided into two steps: extracellular and intracellular digestion. Extracellular digestion starts in the prey, where the chyme is formed after the action of salivary gland enzymes. After the chyme is ingested by the mouth, it flows to the anterior stomach (crop) and almost simultaneously to the posterior stomach, caecum and digestive gland (DG) where it is absorbed and intracellular digestion begins. The DG plays a key role in the digestive process, where chyme nutrients are hydrolysed and transformed into acyl-glycerides, amino acids (AA), or carbohydrates (Boucaud-Camou et al., ; Boucher-Rodoni et al., ; Budelmann et al., ). According to Linares et al. () these processes are affected not only by the type of diet, but also by habitat temperature of each species.
Some years ago, it was proposed that O. mimus and O. maya were separated from the O. vulgaris co-family as a result of the separation of populations provoked by the emergence of Central America. The hypothesis suggests that this new geomorphology interrupted the genetic flow between Pacific and Atlantic populations, favoring their speciation (Perez-Losada et al., ; Porta, ). Recently the thermal tolerance of O. mimus embryos was established in the range of 14–21°C, explaining why this species is distributed from the tropical coastal zone of northern Peru (Tumbes) to sub-tropical zone of central Chile (Bahía de San Vicente) along a natural thermal range of 15–21°C (Uriarte et al., ). Conversely, O. maya inhabits a tropical ecosystem in the Yucatán Peninsula where the benthic thermal regime is in the range of 22–26°C (Noyola et al., ). So although both species probably have the same evolutionary origin, it is reasonable to suppose that environmental conditions in each habitat modulate their physiology, and in consequence the manner in which each species ingest, digest, and use the nutrients obtained from food.
This paper summarizes all the steps in the digestive physiology of O. maya and O. mimus particularly regarding the digestion timing of raw nutrients: absorption, transportation, storing and use of nutrients as a source of energy. Considering that crustaceans are the primary prey of both octopus species (Leite et al., ) and also the most complete food type (Rosas et al., ), this paper summarizes the studies performed on both octopus species fed with crab meat (Martínez et al., , ; Linares et al., ). Using O. maya and O. mimus as models, the results obtained to date allow us to provide a general overview of (digestive physiology in these species, that we believe can be applied to other species living in the tropics (O. maya) and sub-tropics (O. mimus). In this context, we think that this summary is valuable for the development and management of a balanced feed that would allow maintenance of octopus species in captivity under the best nutritional conditions possible.
Starting the digestion process
Protein digestion in octopuses starts in the prey when enzyme action, mainly chymotrypsin excreted by posterior salivary glands, initiates external digestion (Boucaud-Camou and Boucher-Rodoni, ). As in other octopus species, chymotrypsin activity in O. maya and O. mimus was detected as the principal enzyme of salivary glands involved in external digestion, where a pre-digestion of raw flesh produces soluble proteins that form the chyme when ingested (Aguila et al., ; Linares et al., ). Forty to eighty minutes after feeding, the first chyme rapidly fills the crop, stomach and octopus caecum. Besides the obvious role as the first nutritional molecules input, we hypothesize that this first chyme could activate zymogens (acidic and alkaline enzymes) located in the gastric juice (GJ) along the digestive tract and absorption sites in the DG where those enzymes are present. This hypothesis is based on the fact that the chyme composition, besides polypeptides produced by the pre-digestion in the prey, includes active enzymes from the prey that act on the zymogens (Boucaud-Camou and Boucher-Rodoni, ; Hedstrom, ). Results obtained in Sepioteuthis lessoniana demonstrated that, during digestion process, zymogens were newly released after the 1 h after feeding, increasing digestive efficiency in this species. From this perspective, Martínez et al. () proposed that the first pulse of AA observed in the chyme could stimulate the brush border of the acinar cells in the octopus DG (Martínez et al., ) increasing, as in S. lessoniana, the digestive efficiency in octopus species. Although, it is unknown if AA content in the chyme can stimulate the digestive cells in the DG of octopus species, in chicken intestine some AA were observed to enhance the absorption of other AA, increasing the digestive efficiency of proteins (Herzberg and Lerner, ). Therefore, we hypothesize that free AA in the first pulse of chyme registered in O. maya and O. mimus may facilitate nutrient absorption when more complex molecules are digested and absorbed in the second chyme pulse (Linares et al., ).
Nutrient process in digestive gland
Previous experiments with O. maya confirmed that glucose, synthesized via the gluconeogenic pathway, is the final energetic product of protein catabolism (Martínez et al., ; Rosas et al., ; Baeza-Rojano et al., ). Linares et al. () showed that protein catabolism and glycogen synthesis in O. maya and O. mimus followed an inverse relationship throughout the digestive process. In that study, glycogen accumulation occurred at the end of the digestive process, when the AA and polypeptides were transformed into glycogen via the gluconeogenesis pathway. Linares et al. () also identified lipids as a source of energy in O. maya, while glycogen was the first source of energy for O. mimus. Such differences could be related to the type of food that was used in each experiment; O. maya was fed crab of the genus Callinectes spp. because this is the favorite prey of this octopus species. Due to its role as a molting hormone precursor, cholesterol (Chol) is highly concentrated in the crustacean DG, (Teshima, ; Teshima et al., ; Pascual et al., ), and therefore is readily available to octopuses. It is possible that the two Chol peaks observed in the chyme of O. maya were obtained first from the haemolymph and later from that stored in the crab DG (Linares et al., ; Figure 2). Results obtained by Linares et al. () also suggest that both Chol and AG were mainly used as a source of metabolic energy in the DG, because those authors did not detect changes in those nutrients in the haemolymph during their study. As a key digestive organ, the DG provides digestive enzymes and stores nutrients that are used as a metabolic energy source, with glucose (O. mimus) and lipids (O. maya) being the most important (Boucaud-Camou et al., ; Linares et al., ).
As was shown by Martínez et al. (), DG acini of O. maya are characterized by columnar cellular structures of a single cell type, with heterophagosomes, heterolysosomes, and residual bodies within the cells. Like S. officinalis, the DG cell kinetics in O. maya and O. mimus are related to the digestive process, in which cell metabolism and cell synthesis is directly associated with chyme pulses, which in turn are related to the ingestion of food (Boucaud-Camou et al., ; Boucher-Rodoni et al., ; Perrin et al., ). In O. maya, O mimus and other octopus species, asynchrony of the digestive cells depends on the digestive moment; the same digestive cells can be observed with different roles, either synthesizing enzymes or receiving the produced chyme for absorption and assimilation (Martínez et al., ; Linares et al., ). For that reason in the early stages of cephalopod research some researchers indicated that there were different types of cells in the DG (Budelmann et al., ).
As in other cephalopods species, the DG of O. maya and O. mimus perform intracellular digestion and release enzymes that will be used in the extracellular digestion (Semmens, ). During the digestive process the chyme provokes strong changes in the DG cells due to the biochemical reactions that occur in the heterolysosomes, where nutrients are digested by powerful acidic enzymes that cause cell wear. Under this dynamic, acinar cells will be replaced after each meal, requiring energy to complete this synthesis. Previous studies carried out in our laboratory demonstrated that the DG condition of O. maya, measured through its enzymatic activity depends on the type of diet. Aguila et al. () fed octopus varied concentrations of fish meal and fish hydrolysed protein, and found that the enzymatic activity in the DG was higher in animals fed diets that provoked lower growth than obtained in animals fed crab, which produced the highest growth rate. That study demonstrated that animal diets made with fish meal and fish hydrolysed protein have low growth rates and lower DG energy content than octopuses fed crab, suggesting that the type of food determines not only the amount of energy directed to growth, but also the energy stored in the DG that will be used to process the next meal. Those results and others obtained from experiments performed with O. maya indicate that the type and level of protein are the principal source of metabolic energy in the muscle, while lipids are the principal source of energy for DG intracellular metabolism (Martínez et al., ; Rosas et al., ; Baeza-Rojano et al., ). Similar results were observed in O. mimus, indicating that the biochemical pathways observed in O. maya could be generalized to other octopus species (Linares et al., ).
Digestive enzymes
Acidic enzymes in the crop, stomach and DG were first observed in O. vulgaris (Morishita, ). Studies by Martínez et al. () and Linares et al. () indicate that acidic enzymes are not only present in O. vulgaris, but also in O. maya and O. mimus. Those enzymes were also observed in other cephalopod species such as squid and cuttlefish (Perrin et al., ; Cardenas-Lopez and Haard, , ), suggesting that this type of enzyme has a key role in the digestive capacity of cephalopods. A partial characterization of the digestive enzymes in the GJ and DG of O. maya (Martínez et al., ) found that cathepsin D, which requires an acidic environment to develop maximum activity, is 18 and 72% inhibited in the GJ and DG, respectively; this indicates that as shown by Morishita (), acidic enzymes have an important role in the digestive process of this octopus species. However, that family of enzymes (cathepsin and pepsin) has been demonstrated to be quite sensitive to the biochemical structure of the ingested protein. In a study of myofibrillar protein susceptibility to proteases (pepsin) when meat is exposed to heating, the cooking process was observed to affect protein digestibility via a reduction of attack enzyme sites in the denatured protein (Santé-Lhoutellier et al., ). To test if ingredients cooked at a high temperature also affect their digestibility for octopus (via the reduction of cathepsin attack sites in cooked protein), seven experiments carried out to study the effects of several industrial cooked fish, clam and squid meal, and laboratory cooked crab meat on growth and survival of O. maya juveniles (Rosas et al., ). Results of that study showed that diets based on fresh crab paste, lyophilized crab, and squid promoted better growth rates than those observed in animals fed diets made with cooked meal. Also, the in vitro enzyme activity was higher in the DG of animals fed cooked ingredients than in the DG of animals fed fresh pastes, indicating that a secretagogue effect was induced in those animals as a consequence of reduced diet digestibility. Therefore, lyophilisation was considered the method that maintained native protein in octopus diets, through facilitation of cathepsin enzyme activity, and in consequence better diet digestibility (Martínez et al., ; Tercero-Iglesias et al., ). Although, the effect of the pH on the GJ and DG enzymes was only established in O. maya (Martínez et al., ), Linares et al. () observed that high enzymatic activity can be obtained when the gastric juice of O. mimus is assayed in relatively low pH (5.5). Considering that only an 18% enzyme inhibition was observed when pepstatin A was used in O. maya GJ, it is possible to hypothesize that there are other cathepsins working in the acidic environments of the GJ. For example, cathepsin L activity was demonstrated in the giant squid Dosidicus gigas (Cardenas-Lopez and Haard, ), suggesting that if the DG intracellular pH is acidic in other cephalopods, then other cathepsins in addition to cathepsin D (Martínez et al., ) may also be present in the GJ.
Results obtained until now indicate that there is synchronization between DG enzymes pulses and the GJ enzyme activity. In O. maya two pulses were observed (20–80 and 80–180 min), while only one pulse was noted (80–180 min) in the enzyme activity of O. mimus, suggesting strong differences in digestive dynamics between species (Linares et al., ). These differences could be due to the different environmental temperature in the habitat of each species, with more frequent enzyme release in tropical species (e.g., O. maya) than in subtropical or temperate species (O. mimus). Therefore, temperature could be regulating all the digestive activity including ingestion rate, chyme formation, intracellular digestion, and enzyme production. Digestive physiology of O. maya and O. mimus are similar in many aspects to the process described by Boucaud-Camou et al. () for O. vulgaris. Considering the available information, a conceptual model showing the most important aspects of the O. maya and O. mimus digestive physiology was developed, which we think can be applied as a general model to other octopus species (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Octopus maya and O. mimus digestive timing
The digestive physiology timing in O. maya and O. mimus is different and is probably associated with differences in habitat. O. maya is found in habitats where temperature fluctuates between 22 and 30°C, while O. mimus lives in thermal regimes that are between 14 and 22°C. Considering that type of diet and the living weight can modify the digestive timing, Linares et al. (
In that study, two digestive step processes were observed in O. maya: the first one was characterized by production of soluble nutrients in the prey that were rapidly ingested and absorbed, filling the digestive tract and used for muscle protein synthesis (Figure 1). After, a second slower process was identified, where more complex nutrients were obtained from muscle flesh of the prey, transformed into soluble nutrients, then transported to the DG to be catabolized and placed into muscle or stored temporarily to be used as a source of energy for the next meal (Figure 1). The digestive process of O. mimus was slower than in O. maya, showing a peak of muscle glycogen accumulation at the end of the digestive process (400 min after feeding), indicating that each species has its own timing and physiological process, related to the thermal regime in which species has evolved (Linares et al.,
Figure 2 summarizes the digestive process occurring in each section of the digestive tract of O. maya (Figure 2A) and O. mimus (Figure 2B). In that figure, all the digestive sequences that occur at the same time and along the digestive tract during digestion of each species are encapsulated. From this figure it is evident that although the general process is similar between species, there are differences in the timing of the process and the form in which DG reserves are used. In O. mimus, lipids were mobilized faster than proteins while in O. maya an inverse relationship between proteins and lipids was observed, suggesting that mobilization of lipids could be a priority in temperate octopus species (Mukhin et al.,
Figure 2

Timing of the digestive process, absorption and assimilation in adults of O. maya(A) and O. mimus(B) of the food. Before the ingestion, gastric juice (GJ) is located along the digestive tract: crop, stomach and caecum. Reserves in the DG are constant. Once the prey was offered O. maya took 20 min to ingest food while O. mimus took 140 min. While O. maya stored protein, O. mimus stored AG and Chol. The peak of the digestive process was recorded around 180 min after feeding in O. maya and 360 min after feeding in O. mimus. The end of the process was registered between 360 to 480 min in both species. Dt, digestive tract; DG, digestive gland; Ca, caecum; SP, soluble protein; Chol, cholesterol; AG, acyl glycerides; Glu, glucose; Gly, glycogen; GLx, glucose and glycogen mix; Enz, digestive enzymes; AA, amino acids. Symbol + indicates the magnitude of metabolites accumulated in DG.
Both O. maya and O. mimus prepare their digestive tracts for digestion. Martínez et al. (
Both octopus species reacted immediately to offered meals, although there were differences between them. In O. maya adults, 20 min is enough to ingest a crab of around 100 g at 26°C (Martínez et al.,
As was mentioned earlier, the role of the salivary glands at the beginning of digestion process is important (Boucaud-Camou and Boucher-Rodoni,
Once the digestive system in the DG is activated, heterophagosomes in the acinar cells transport energetic molecules to the haemolymph, where they are transported to muscle and other tissues (Linares et al.,
Differences between species can be also observed in relation to the use and destination of nutrients in the DG and other tissues (Figure 2). Haemolymph glucose levels changed significantly during the digestive process in O. maya, indicating that this nutrient is mobilized to support the energetic demands in different tissues of the animal (Figure 2A). The higher mobility could be necessary to satisfy the muscle energy demands in their tropical environment (Noyola et al.,
Although, Linares et al. (
At the end of the digestive process (480 min after feeding), a DG pH reduction was reported in O. maya and O. mimus (Martínez et al.,
Following the histological dynamics of DG in O. maya, Martínez et al. (
As was previously stated for O. vulgaris by Boucaud-Camou and Boucher-Rodoni (
Statements
Author contributions
CR, PG, AO, RM, and CC designed and ran the experiments in Mexico and Chile. CR, PG, PD, MM, CP, and AS, performed the laboratory analysis and processed the data. All authors contributed to write the paper.
Funding
This research was partially financed by the project PAPIIT IT201117 from the DGAPA-UNAM to PG and the project PAPIIT IN219116 from DGAPA-UNAM to CR. Also thanks are given to Dirección General de Cooperación e Internacionalización of UNAM for support gave to TEMPOXMAR research net.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the support from COST action project: COST Action FA1301.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AguilaJ.CuzonG.PascualC.DominguesP.GaxiolaG.SánchezA.et al. (2007). The effects of fish hydrolysate (CPSP) level on Octopus maya (Voss and Solis) diet: digestive enzyme activity, blood metabolites, and energy balance. Aquaculture273, 641–655. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.07.010
2
Alejo-PlataM. C.Gómez-MarquezJ. L.Ramos-CarrilloS.Herrera-GalindoJ. E. (2009). Reproducción, dieta y Pesquería del pulpo Octopus (Octopus) hubbsorum (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) en la costa de Oaxaca, México. Int. J. Trop. Biol.57, 63–78. 10.15517/rbt.v57i1-2.11291
3
Angeles-GonzalezL. E.CalvaR.Santos-ValenciaJ.Avila-PovedaO. H.OlivaresA.DíazF.et al. (2017). Temperature modulates spatio-temporal variability of the functional reproductive maturation of Octopus maya (Cephalopoda) on the shelf of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. J. Molluscan Stud. 10.1093/mollus/eyx013
4
Avila-PovedaO. H.KouetaN.Benites-VillalobosF.Santos-ValenciaJ.RosasC. (2016). Reproductive traits of Octopus maya (Cephalopoda: Octopoda) with implications for fisheries management. Molluscan Res.36, 29–44. 10.1080/13235818.2015.1072912
5
Baeza-RojanoE.DominguesP.Camaal-MonsrealC.Guerra-GarcíaJ.CapellaS.NoreñaE.et al. (2013). Use of marine and freshwater gammarids as alternative prey to culture Octopus maya hatchlings. Aquacult. Res.44, 1602–1612. 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2012.03169.x
6
Boucaud-CamouE.Boucher-RodoniR. (1983). Feeding and digestion in cephalopods, in The Mollusca, eds SaleuddinA. S. M.WilburK. M. (New York, NY: Academic Press), 149–187.
7
Boucaud-CamouE.Boucher-RodoniR.MangoldK. (1976). Digestive absorption in Octopus vulgaris (Cephalopoda: Octopoda). J. Zool.179, 261–271. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1976.tb02295.x
8
Boucher-RodoniR.Boucaud-CamouE.MangoldK. (1987). Feeding and digestion, in Cephalopod Life Cycles, ed BoyleP. R. (London: Academic Press), 85–108.
9
BudelmannB. U.SchippR.BoletzkyS. V. (1997). Cephalopoda, in Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates, eds HarrisonF. W.KohnA. (New York, NY: Willey-Liss), 119–414.
10
Caamal-MonsrealC.MascaróM.GallardoP.GallardoP.RodriguezS.Noreña-BarrosoE.et al. (2015). Effects of maternal diet on reproductive performance of O. maya and its consequences on biochemical characteristics of the yolk, morphology of embryos and hatchlings quality. Aquaculture441, 84–94. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.01.020
11
Cardenas-LopezJ. L.HaardN. F. (2005). Cystein proteinase activity in jumbo squid (Dosidiscus jigas) hepatopacreas extracts. J. Food Biochem.29, 171–186. 10.1111/j.1745-4514.2005.00009.x
12
Cardenas-LopezJ. L.HaardN. F. (2009). Identification of a cysteine proteinase from Jumbo squid (Dosidicus gigas) hepatopancreas as cathepsin L. Food Chem.112, 442–447. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.05.100
13
Cerezo-ValverdeJ.Dolores-HernándezM.-D.Aguado-GiménezF.Morillo-VelardeP. S.García-GarcíaB. (2013). Performance of formulated diets with different level of lipids and glutamate supplementation in Octopus vulgaris. Aquacult. Res.44, 1952–1964. 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2012.03201.x
14
Cerezo-ValverdeJ.HernándezM.García-GarridoS.RodríguezC.EstefanellJ.GairínJ.et al. (2012a). Lipid classes from marine species and meals intended for cephalopod feeding. Aquacult. Int.20, 71–89. 10.1007/s10499-011-9442-z
15
Cerezo-ValverdeJ.Martínez-LlorensS.TomásA.JoverM.RodríguezC.EstefanellJ.et al. (2012b). Amino acids composition and protein quality evaluation of marine species and meals for feed formulations in cephalopods. Aquacult. Int. 21, 413–433. 10.1007/s10499-012-9569-6
16
EstefanellJ.RooJ.GuiraoR.AfonsoJ. M.Fernández-PalaciosH.IzquierdoM.et al. (2013). Efficient utilization of dietary lipids in Octopus vulgaris (Cuvier 1797) fed fresh and agglutinated moist diets based on aquaculture by-products and low price trash species. Aquacult. Res.44, 93–105. 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.03014.x
17
García-GarridoS.Hachero-CruzadoI.DominguesP.LópezN.RosasC. (2011). Effects of fish hydrolysate (CPSP®) on growth and digestive gland lipid composition of Octopus vulgaris (Cuvier, 1797) juveniles. Aquacult. Nutr.17, e825–e839. 10.1111/j.1365-2095.2010.00839.x
18
George-ZamoraA.VianaT.RodriguezS.EspinozaG.RosasC. (2011). Amino acid mobilization and growth of juvenile Octopus maya (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) under inanition and re-feeding. Aquaculture314, 121–124. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.02.022
19
HamdanM.Tomás-VidalA.MartínezS.Cerezo-ValverdeJ.MoyanoF. J. (2014). Development of an in vitro model to assess protein bioavailability in diets for common octopus (Octopus vulgaris). Aquacult. Res.45, 2048–2056. 10.1111/are.12155
20
HedstromL. (2002). Serine protease mechanism and specificity. Chem. Rev.102, 4501–4524. 10.1021/cr000033x
21
HerzbergG. R.LernerJ. (1973). The effect of preloaded amino acids on Lysine and Homoarginine transport in chicken small intestine. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.44A, 1–16. 10.1016/0300-9629(73)90364-2
22
KrstulovícS.VrgocN. (2009). Diet and feeding of the musky octopus, Eledone moschata, in the northern Adriatic Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K.89, 413–419. 10.1017/S0025315408002488
23
LeiteT. S.HaimoviciM.MatherJ. A. (2009). Octopus insularis (Octopodidae), evidences of a specialized predator and a time-minimizing hunter. Mar. Biol.156, 2355–2367. 10.1007/s00227-009-1264-4
24
LinaresM.RodríguezS.Caamal-MonsrealC.OlivaresA.ZúñigaO.SanchezA.et al. (2015). Timing of digestion, absorption and assimilation of octopus species living in tropical (Octopus maya) and sub-tropical-temperate (O. mimus) ecosystems. Aquat. Biol.24, 127–140. 10.3354/ab00642
25
LoretS. M. (1993). Hemocyte differentiation in the shore crab (Carcinus maenas) could be accompained by a loss of glycogenosynthesis capability. J. Exp. Zool.267, 548–555. 10.1002/jez.1402670510
26
MartínezR.GallardoP.PascualC.NavarroJ. C.SánchezA.Caamal-MonsrealC.et al. (2014). Growth, survival and physiological condition of Octopus maya when fed a successful formulated diet. Aquaculture426–427, 310–317. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.02.005
27
MartínezR.SantosR.AlvarezA.CuzonG.ArenaL.MascaróM.et al. (2011). Partial characterization of hepatopancreatic and extracellular digestive proteinases of wild and cultivated Octopus maya. Aquacult. Int.19, 445–457. 10.1007/s10499-010-9360-5
28
MartínezR.SantosR.MascaróM.CansecoL.Caamal-MonsrealC.RosasC. (2012). Digestive dynamics during chyme formation of Octopus maya (Mollusca, Cephalopoda). Aquacult. Res.43, 1119–1126. 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02915.x
29
MiliouH.FintikakiM.KountourisT.VerriopoulosG. (2005). Combined effects of temperature and body weight on growth and protein utilization of the common octopus, Octopus vulgaris. Aquaculture249, 245–256. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.03.038
30
MorishitaT. (1974). Participation in digestion by proteolitic enzymes of the posterior salivary gland in Octopus. I. Confirmation of the existence of protein digestive enzymes in the posterior salivary gland. Nippon Suisam Gakkaishi40, 601–607.
31
MukhinV. A.SmirnovaE. B.NovikovV. Y. (2007). Peculiarities of digestive function of proteinases in invertebrates–inhabitants of cold seas. J. Evol. Biochem. Physiol.43, 476–482. 10.1134/S0022093007050039
32
NoyolaJ.MascaróM.CaamalC.Nore-a-BarrosoE.DíazF.ReA. D.et al. (2013). Effect of temperature on energetic balance and fatty acid composition of early juveniles of Octopus maya. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.445, 156–165. 10.1016/j.jembe.2013.04.008
33
PascualC.SnchezA.Vargas-AlboresF.LemoullacG.RosasC. (2003). Haemolymph metabolic variables and immune response in Litopenaeus setiferus adult males: the effect of an extreme temperature. Aquaculture218, 637–650. 10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00300-9
34
Pech-PuchD.Cruz-LópezH.Canche-EkC.Campos-EspinosaG.GarcíaE.MascaróM.et al. (2016). Chemical tools of Octopus maya during crab predation are also active on conspecifics. PLoS ONE11:e0148922. 10.1371/journal.pone.0148922
35
Perez-LosadaM. P.GuerraA.SanjuanA. (2002). Allozyme divergence supporting the taxonomic separation of Octopus mimus and Octopus maya from Octopus vulgaris (Cephalopoda: Octopoda). Bull. Mar. Sci.71, 653–664.
36
PerrinA.Le BihanE.KouetaN. (2004). Experimental study of enriched frozen diet on digestive enzymes and growth of juvenile cuttlefish Sepia officinalis L. (Mollusca Cephalopoda). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.311, 267–285. 10.1016/j.jembe.2004.05.012
37
PortaJ. (2003). La formación del Istmo de Panamá. Su incidencia en Colombia. Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. 27, 191–216.
38
QuerolP.Morillo-VelardeP. S.Cerezo-ValverdeJ.Martínez-LlorensS.Vicente-Mo-inoA.Jover-CerdáM.et al. (2013). Inclusion of fish and krill meal in extruded diets for Octopus vulgaris (Cuvier, 1797): assessment of acceptance. Aquacult. Res.45, 1421–1424. 10.1111/are.12093
39
Rodriguez-GonzálezT.Cerezo-ValverdeJ.SykesA. V.García-GarcíaB. (2015). Performance of raw material thermal treatment on formulated feeds for common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) ongrowing. Aquaculture442, 37–43. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.01.035
40
RosaR.PereiraJ.NunesM. L. (2005). Biochemical composition of cephalopods with different life strategies, with special reference to a giant squid, Architeuthis sp. Mar. Biol.146, 739–759. 10.1007/s00227-004-1477-5
41
RosasC.CuzonG.GaxiolaG.PascualC.TaboadaG.ArenaL.et al. (2002). An energetic and conceptual model of the physiological role of dietary carbohydrates and salinity on Litopenaeus vannamei juveniles. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.268, 47–67. 10.1016/S0022-0981(01)00370-7
42
RosasC.GallardoP.MascaróM.Caamal-MonsrealC.PascualC. (2014). Octopus maya, in Cephalopod Culture, eds IglesiasJ.FuentesL.VillanuevaR. (Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media), 383–396. 10.1007/978-94-017-8648-5_20
43
RosasC.MaldonadoT.DominguesP.SánchezA.PascualC.AguilaJ.et al. (2011). Effects of two dietary protein levels on energy balance and digestive capacity of Octopus maya. Aquacult. Int.19, 165–180. 10.1007/s10499-010-9350-7
44
RosasC.ValeroA.Caamal-MonsrealC.UriarteI.FariasA.GallardoP.et al. (2013). Effects of dietary protein sources on growth, survival and digestive capacity of Octopus maya juveniles (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). Aquacult. Res.44, 1029–1044. 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2012.03107.x
45
RouraA.GonzálezA.ReddK.GuerraA. (2012). Molecular prey identification in wild Octopus vulgaris paralarvae. Mar. Biol.159, 1335–1345. 10.1007/s00227-012-1914-9
46
Santé-LhoutellierV.AstructT.MarinovaP.GreveE.GatellierP. (2008). Effect of meat cooking on physicochemical state and in vitro digestibility of myofibrillar proteins. J. Agric. Food Chem.56, 1488–1494. 10.1021/jf072999g
47
SemmensJ. M. (2002). Changes in the digestive gland of the loliginid squid Sepioteuthis lessoniana (Lesson, 1830) associated with feeding. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.274, 19–39. 10.1016/s0022-0981(02)00165-x
48
Tercero-IglesiasJ. F.RosasC.MascaróM.Poot-LópezG. R.DominguesP.Nore-aE.et al. (2015). Effects of parental diets supplemented with different lipid sources on Octopus maya embryo and hatching quality. Aquaculture448, 234–242. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.05.023
49
TeshimaS. (1997). Phospholipids and sterols, in Crustacean Nutrition, Advances in World Aquaculture, eds D'AbramoL.ConklinD. E.AkiyamaD. M. (Baton Rouge, LA: The World Aquaculture Society), 85–107.
50
TeshimaS.IshikawaM.KoshioS.KanasawaA. (1997). Necessity of dietary cholesterol for the freshwater prawn. Fish. Sci.63, 596–599.
51
UriarteI.EspinozaV.HerreraM.ZuÃśigaO.OlivaresA.CarbonellP.et al. (2012). Effect of temperature on embryonic development of Octopus mimus under controlled conditions. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 416–417, 168–175. 10.1016/j.jembe.2012.03.003
52
VidalE.VillanuevaR.AndradeJ. P.GleadallI. G.IglesiasJ.KouetaN.et al. (2014). Cephalopod culture: current status of main biological models and research priorities. Adv. Mar. Biol.67, 1–79. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800287-2.00001-9
Summary
Keywords
Octopus maya, O. mimus, digestive physiology, digestive gland, gastric juice, digestive enzymes, assimilation process
Citation
Gallardo P, Olivares A, Martínez-Yáñez R, Caamal-Monsreal C, Domingues PM, Mascaró M, Sánchez A, Pascual C and Rosas C (2017) Digestive Physiology of Octopus maya and O. mimus: Temporality of Digestion and Assimilation Processes. Front. Physiol. 8:355. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00355
Received
02 February 2017
Accepted
15 May 2017
Published
31 May 2017
Volume
8 - 2017
Edited by
Giovanna Ponte, CephRes and SZN, Italy
Reviewed by
Graziano Fiorito, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Italy; Sagiv Kolkovski, Department of Fisheries Western Australia, Australia
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2017 Gallardo, Olivares, Martínez-Yáñez, Caamal-Monsreal, Domingues, Mascaró, Sánchez, Pascual and Rosas.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Carlos Rosas crv@ciencias.unam.mx
This article was submitted to Invertebrate Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.