MINI REVIEW article

Front. Physiol., 19 March 2019

Sec. Clinical and Translational Physiology

Volume 10 - 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00216

Discovery Stories of RET Fusions in Lung Cancer: A Mini-Review

  • 1. Division of Pathology, The Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan

  • 2. Pathology Project for Molecular Targets, The Cancer Institute, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

In 2004, a chemical inhibitor of the kinase activity of EGFR was reported to be effective in a subset of lung cancer patients with activating somatic mutations of EGFR. It remained unclear, however, whether kinase fusion genes also play a major role in the pathogenesis of lung cancers. The discovery of the EML4-ALK fusion kinase in 2007 was a breakthrough for this situation, and kinase fusion genes now form a group of relevant targetable oncogenes in lung cancer. In this mini-review article, the discovery of REarrangement during Transfection fusions, the third kinase fusion gene in lung cancer, is briefly described.

Introduction

Somatic mutations cause cancer via multiple mechanisms, including point mutations, insertions, deletions, and gene rearrangements. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), one of the most common causes of cancer-related deaths, these oncogenic mutations are usually mutually exclusive, and generally only a single major driver mutation is found in each case. In addition, such a cancer usually depends on the signal pathway stimulated by the principal oncogene for its survival (oncogene addiction) (Weinstein, 2002). In 2004, it was reported that a chemical inhibitor of the kinase activity of EGFR was effective in a subset of lung cancer patients with activating somatic mutations of EGFR (; ). NSCLC in which EGFR inhibitors are effective preferentially develop in Asian and non-smoker populations, generally lacking other targetable driver mutations (; ; ). In addition to EGFR mutations, kinase fusion genes have become a group of relevant oncogenes in NSCLC, because targeted inhibition of oncogenic kinase fusion proteins also leads to growth inhibition of the cancer cells and regression of the patient’s tumor.

Gene fusion was known to be a major mechanism of oncogenesis in hematopoietic neoplasms and sarcomas (). Various types of fusion oncogenes were reported () after the identification of the BCR-ABL1 fusion kinase in chronic myelogenous leukemia (). In contrast, it remained unclear for a long time whether such fusion oncogenes also play a major role in the pathogenesis of epithelial tumors. The discovery of the EML4-ALK fusion kinase in NSCLC via inv(2)(p21p23) was a breakthrough in this scenario (). Moreover, several small molecules, such as crizotinib (; ) and alectinib (; Takeuchi et al., 2016; ), showed improved survival outcomes in ALK fusion-positive NSCLC patients. These clinical successes suggested that targeting specific fusion kinases was a promising strategy also for treating carcinomas (epithelial cancers). Representative fusions in epithelial tumors are listed in Table 1.

Table 1

Fusion geneHisological type
Lung carcinomaEML4-ALKNon-small cell carcinoma
TFG-ALK
KIF5B-ALK
KLC1-ALK
STRN-ALK
TPR-ALK
HIP1-ALK
SEC31A-ALK
BIRC6-ALK
KIF5B-RET
CCDC6-RET
NCOA4-RET
TRIM33-RET
RUFY2-RET
CUX1-RET
KIAA1468-RET
CD74-ROS1
SLC34A2-ROS1
SDC4-ROS1
EZR-ROS1
TPM3-ROS1
LRIG3-ROS1
GOPC (FIG)-ROS1
CCDC6-ROS1
MSN-ROS1
CD74-NTRK1
MPRIP-NTRK1
TPM3-NTRK1
TRIM24-NTRK2
BAG4-FGFR1
FGFR2-CIT
FGFR2-KIAA1967
FGFR3-TACC3
FGFR3-BAIAP2L1
SCAF11-PDGFRA
EZR-ERBB4
AXL-MBIP
TRIM4-BRAF
TRIM24-BRAF
SND1-BRAF
CD74-NRG1
VAMP2-NRG1
SLC3A2-NRG1
MAP4K3-PRKCE
BCAS3-MAP3K3
ERBB2IP-MAST4
KRAS-CDH13
APLP2-TNFSF11
ZFYVE9-CGA
TPD52L1-TRMT11
E2A-PBX1
KIF5B-MET
SPNS1-PRKCB
WASF2-FGR
ADCY9-PRKCB
Thyroid carcinomaCCDC6(H4)-RETPapillary carcinoma
TPM3-NTRK1
PRKAR1A-RET
NCOA4(ELE1)-RET
TFG-NTRK1
TPR-NTRK1
GOLGA5-RET
TRIM24-RET
TRIM33-RET
ERC1(RAB6IP2)-RET
KTN1-RET
RFG9-RET
PCM1-RET
RFP(TRIM27)-RET
AKAP9-BRAF
HOOK3-RET
EML4-ALK
PAX8-PPARGFollicular carcinoma
CREB3L2-PPARG
Breast carcinomaETV6-NTRK3Secretary carcinoma
EML4-ALK
ARID1A-MAST2
GPBP1L1-MAST2
ZNF700-MAST1
NFIX-MAST1
TADA2A-MAST1
SEC16A-NOTCH1
SEC22B-NOTCH2
MAGI3-AKT3
Gastric carcinomaAGTRAP-BRAF
CD44-SLC1A2
CLDN18-ARHGAP26
SLC34A2-ROS1
Colorectal carcinomaTPM3-NTRK1
EML4-ALK
C2orf44-ALK
Prostate carcinomaTMPRSS2-ERG
SLC45A3-ERG
HERPUD1-ERG
NDRG1-ERG
SLC45A3-ELK4
TMPRSS2-ETV1
SLC45A3-ETV1
HERVK-ETV1
C15orf21-ETV1
HNRPA2B1-ETV1
ACSL3-ETV1
EST14-ETV1
HERVK17(FLJ35294)-ETV1
FOXP1-ETV1
TMPRSS2-ETV4
DDX5-ETV4
CANT1-ETV4
KLK2-ETV4
TMPRSS2-ETV5
SLC45A3-ETV5
ESRP1-RAF1
RAF1-ESRP1
SLC45A3-BRAF
Renal cell carcinomaPRCC-TFE3Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma
SFPQ-TFE3
NonO-TFE3
ASPSCR1-TFE3
CLTC-TFE3
t(3;X)(q23;p11.23)
Alpha(MALAT1)-TFEB
VCL-ALK
EML4-ALK
TPM3-ALK
STRN-ALK
Bladder carcinomaFGFR3-TACC3Urothelial carcinoma
FGFR3-BAIAP2L1
Salivary gland tumorCTNNB1-PLAG1Pleomorphic adenoma
LIFR-PLAG1
TCEA1-PLAG1
HMGA2-FHIT
HMGA2-NFIB
CHCHD7-PLAG1
HMGA2-WIF1
ETV6-NTRK3Secretory carcinoma
CRTC1-MAML2Mucoepidermoid carcinoma
CRTC3-MAML2
EWSR1-ATF1Clear cell carcinoma
EWSR1-CREM
MYB-NFIBAdenoid cytic carcinoma
MYBL1-NFIB

Representative fusion genes in epithelial tumors.

Receptor tyrosine kinases including ALK usually comprise an extracellular receptor domain, a transmembrane domain, and an intracytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain. The receptor domain binds to ligands, resulting in dimerization of the kinase protein. Then, the dimerized proteins are autophosphorylated and stimulate the RAS-MAPK-ERK and PI3K-AKT pathways to promote cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation. A receptor tyrosine kinase gene rearrangement gives rise to the expression of the fusion kinase protein if the 5′-partner gene fuses with the 3′-kinase gene in an in-frame fashion. These fusion kinases can be oncogenic when they retain the kinase domain and are dimerized through the 5′ partner, because this dimerization mimics that of the wild-type receptor tyrosine kinases through ligand binding. Consequently, a fusion kinase is constitutively expressed, dimerized, and autoactivated, and its downstream signaling promotes cell proliferation and survival.

Alk Fusion

ALK is a receptor tyrosine kinase that is not expressed in normal cells in adult mammals except for nerve cells. The most common mechanism of ALK overexpression and ALK kinase domain activation in neoplastic cells is the formation of a fusion protein with a partner through genomic rearrangement. In fact, ALK was first discovered in anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) in the form of a fusion protein, NPM1-ALK (; ). Other ALK fusion partners reported in ALCL are TFG, TPM3, TPM4, ATIC, RNF213, CLTC, MSN, MYH9, and TRAF (; , ; ; Touriol et al., 2000; ; Tort et al., 2001; ; ). NPM1-ALK is the most common ALK fusion in ALK-positive ALCL (70–80%), followed by TPM3-ALK (12–18%) (Tsuyama et al., 2017), and other fusions are rare. Except for ALCL, several hematopoietic neoplasms have been reported to have the following ALK fusion partners: CLTC, NPM1, SEC31A, SQSTM1, RANBP2, and EML4 in ALK-positive large B-cell lymphoma (; Van Roosbroeck et al., 2010; Takeuchi et al., 2011; ; ); TPM3 in ALK-positive histiocytosis (); and RANBP2 in myeloid leukemia (). In solid tumors, ALK fusions were identified in approximately 50% of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with the following fusion partners: TPM3, TPM4, CLTC, ATIC, CARS, SEC31A, RANBP2, PPFIBP1, FN1, TFG, EML4, LMNA, PRKAR1A, DCTN1, and RRBP1 (; ; ; ; ; ; ; Takeuchi et al., 2011; ; ). Other ALK fusion-positive solid tumors include renal cancer (; ; Sugawara et al., 2012; ), colon cancer (; ; Stransky et al., 2014; ; Yakirevich et al., 2016), breast cancer (), ovarian cancer (), thyroid cancer (; ; ; ; Stransky et al., 2014; ), and bladder cancer (Stransky et al., 2014). The frequencies are 1–2% in thyroid cancer (; ; ; ) and less than 1% in kidney and colon cancers (Sugawara et al., 2012; Yakirevich et al., 2016). In NSCLC, EML4 is the most common partner of ALK. Although very rare, KIF5B, KLC1, TFG, STRN, PTPN3, HIP1, TPR, SEC31A, SQSTM1, DCTN1, and CRIM1 were also reported as an ALK fusion partner (; Takeuchi et al., 2009; ; Togashi et al., 2012; ; ; ; ; ; Tan et al., 2016).

Ret Fusion

REarrangement during Transfection (RET) was identified by Takahashi et al. in 1985 as a proto-oncogene that underwent rearrangement during the transfection of DNA extracted from human T-cell lymphoma into NIH-3T3 cells (Takahashi et al., 1985). RET is a receptor tyrosine kinase encoded by a gene located on 10q11.22 (), and physiologically plays an important role in the development of neurons and kidneys. The first RET fusion in human cancer samples, CCDC6-RET, was identified in papillary thyroid carcinoma by . RET fusions are detected in 13–43% of papillary thyroid carcinomas (), and at least 12 RET fusions have been reported so far (Table 2).

Table 2

RET fusionLocus of the partner geneReference
CCDC6(H4)-RET10q21.2
PRKAR1A-RET17q24.2
NCOA4(ELE1)-RET10q11.23
GOLGA5-RET14q32.12
TRIM24-RET7q33-34
TRIM33-RET1p13.2
ERC1(RAB6IP2)-RET12p13.33
KTN1-RET14q22.3
RFG9-RET18q21-22
PCM1-RET8q21-22
RFP(TRIM27)-RET6p22.1
HOOK3-RET8p11.21

RET fusions in thyroid cancer.

Discovery of Ret Fusions in Lung Cancer

In 2012, the first RET fusion in lung cancer, KIF5B-RET, was reported independently by 4 groups from Korea (), Japan (2 groups) (; Takeuchi et al., 2012), and the United States (). examined tissue and peripheral blood samples from a 33-year-old Korean never-smoking male with lung adenocarcinoma. The patient was negative for EGFR and KRAS mutations, and the EML4-ALK fusion gene, which were the three well-known driver mutations in lung adenocarcinoma at that time. Fifty-two fusion transcripts were called by transcriptome analysis in the patient’s adenocarcinoma. Out of 52 fusions, they could detect a corresponding genomic rearrangement only for KIF5B-RET fusion (KIF5B exon 16;RET exon 12 fusion variant. K16;R12) by whole genome sequencing. Additionally, they performed transcriptome analysis in 5 lung adenocarcinomas that were negative for EGFR and KRAS mutations and EML4-ALK, and identified one more case with KIF5B-RET fusion transcript (K15;R12). Furthermore, they found another KIF5B-RET-positive case (K23;R12) in 15 “double-negative (negative for EGFR mutation and EML4-ALK but KRAS status unknown)” lung adenocarcinomas by RT-PCR. Based on their detection rate, they estimated that the fusion might exist in approximately 6% of lung adenocarcinomas.

The following three studies were published in the same issue of the same journal, reflecting the “fusion kinase discovery race in major carcinomas” in those days. In the three studies, the frequency and oncogenicity of KIF5B-RET were more specifically evidenced, and growth inhibition analyses using cell lines and RET inhibitors were performed. at the National Cancer Center researchers in Japan performed whole-transcriptome sequencing of 30 lung adenocarcinomas to identify new fusion genes that could be targeted for therapy. As a result, they discovered a KIF5B-RET fusion transcript in 1 out of 30 cases. In addition, 289 Japanese lung adenocarcinomas were screened by RT-PCR and Sanger sequence analyses, and the KIF5B-RET fusion gene was identified in 5 cases. In total, they identified 6 KIF5B-RET-positive cases out of 319 lung adenocarcinomas (1.9%), and 4 fusion variants in these 6 tumors. They also examined lung adenocarcinomas in the United States and Norway, and detected a KIF5B-RET transcript in one of the 80 (1.3%) subjects from the United States, but not in the 34 from Norway. They exogenously expressed a KIF5B-RET transcript (KIF5B exon 15;RET exon 12 variant. K15;R12) in the H1299 human lung cancer cell line and showed that Tyr905 was phosphorylated in the absence of serum stimulation. This phosphorylation was suppressed by vandetanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor to several receptor tyrosine kinases, including RET. They also showed that expression of exogenous KIF5B-RET induced morphological transformation and anchorage-independent growth of NIH-3T3 cells, which was suppressed by vandetanib.

analyzed genomic DNA extracted from 24 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens of NSCLC by capture sequencing targeting 2,574 coding exons of 145 cancer-relevant genes and 37 introns of 14 frequently rearranged genes in cancer. They identified a KIF5B-RET transcript (K15;R12), generated via an 11,294,741-bp pericentric inversion on chromosome 10 in a lung adenocarcinoma from a 44-year-old never-smoking man of European ancestry. They detected KIF5B-RET fusions by RT-PCR in 1 of 121 (0.8%) European-ancestry and 9 of 405 (2%) Asian subjects, all of whom were never or limited former smokers. They estimated an overall occurrence rate of 2.0% (95% CI 0.8–3.1%). Four transcript variants were reported by them: K15;R12, K16;R12, K22;R12, and K15;R11. Ba/F3 cells, which are dependent on interleukin-3 (IL-3) for growth, that expressed KIF5B-RET were transformed and lived without IL-3. The cells were sensitive to sunitinib, sorafenib, and vandetanib, which are multi-target kinase inhibitors that inhibit RET.

Unlike the above-mentioned three studies, Takeuchi et al. (2012) identified KIF5B-RET fusions without next-generation sequencing analyses, but with traditional methods. They established an integrated platform of conventional histopathology and molecular pathology to identify fusion genes in various types of cancer. They performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with their laboratory-made probes on tissue microarrays of various types of cancers. Using lung cancer tissue microarrays containing 1,528 samples, rearrangement of KIF5B was examined by a split FISH assay to discover new fusions, because they previously identified KIF5B-ALK fusions in lung cancer (Takeuchi et al., 2009) and thus hypothesized that KIF5B might fuse to other kinases in lung cancer. Twenty-four KIF5B split FISH-positive tumors were identified; among them, a KIF5B-RET transcript (K23;R12) was identified by 3′ rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). Then, 22 RET rearrangement-positive tumors were identified in 1,528 lung cancers by RET split FISH. Among the 22 cases, 12 KIF5B-RET-positive tumors were identified through a multiplex RT-PCR system that captures all possible KIF5B-RET fusions: 8 cases with K15;R12, and one case each with the K16;R12, K22;R12, K23;R12, and K24;R11. The presence of inv(10)(p11.22q11.2) was supported by a KIF5B-RET fusion FISH assay in all 12 of these tumors. In lung cancer, they also identified CCDC6-RET, which is the first RET fusion identified in thyroid cancer (). In a routine pathology diagnosis during the study period, a pathologist in the group encountered an adenocarcinoma with a mucinous cribriform pattern that is a histopathological marker for the presence of EML4-ALK (). The case was, however, negative for ALK fusion and was positive for CCDC6-RET, as determined by FISH and inverse RT-PCR. In the remaining 10 tumors, another CCDC6-RET-positive tumor was identified by RT-PCR. In total, 14 RET fusion-positive tumors (13 out of the 1,528 tumors tested, and one additional tumor found through a routine pathology diagnostic service) were identified. RET fusions existed in 0.9% (13 out of 1,482) of the NSCLCs and 1.2% (13 out of 1,119) of the adenocarcinomas. The researchers demonstrated the oncogenicity of all the 5 KIF5B-RET fusion variants they identified through a focus formation assay and a mouse subcutaneous transplantation assay using NIH-3T3 cells expressing each KIF5B-RET variant. KIF5B-RET (K15;R12) transfected Ba/F3 cells grew in the absence of IL-3. Vandetanib inhibited the proliferation of cells expressing K15;R12 but not the proliferation of cells expressing EML4-ALK.

To date, at least 15 RET fusions have been reported in NSCLC including KIF5B-RET (; ; ; Takeuchi et al., 2012), CCDC6-RET (Takeuchi et al., 2012), NCOA4-RET (Wang et al., 2012), TRIM33-RET (), RUFY2-RET (Zheng et al., 2014), CUX1-RET (), KIAA1468-RET (), CLIP1-RET (), ERC1-RET (), MYO5C-RET (), EPHA5-RET (), PICALM-RET (), FRMD4A-RET (Velcheti et al., 2017), KIF13A-RET (Zhang et al., 2018), and WAC-RET (Velcheti et al., 2018; Table 3). Most cases of RET fusion-positive NSCLCs are adenocarcinoma, although some authors reported non-adenocarcinoma cases including adenosquamous cell carcinoma (Wang et al., 2012; ) and squamous cell carcinoma (). In RET fusion-positive adenocarcinomas, specific histological features were not identified, although several characteristic features like cytoplasmic mucin production were detected (Tsuta et al., 2014). Driver mutations in other genes including EGFR, KRAS, HER2, BRAF, ALK, and ROS1 are rare.

Table 3

RET fusionLocus of the partner geneEnd exon of the partner geneStart exon of RETReference#casesageSexCountry/raceHistopathologyEGFR mutationKRAS mutationOther driver mutation
KIF5B-RET10p11.223KoreaAdenocarcinoma0/30/2Negative for EML4-ALK
76 Japan, 1 United StatesAdenocarcinoma0/70/7Negative for HER2 mutation and ALK rearrangement
Takeuchi et al., 201212JapanAdenocarcinoma0/120/12Negative for ALK and ROS1 rearrangements
12NAAdenocarcinoma0/120/12Negative for ERBB2 and BRAF mutations, EML4-ALK, and ROS1 rearrangements
CCDC6-RET10q21.2112Takeuchi et al., 20122JapanAdenocarcinoma0/20/2Negative for ALK and ROS1 rearrangements
NCOA4-RET10q11.23612Wang et al., 2012180FNAAdenocarcinoma0/10/1Negative for ALK rearrangement
TRIM33-RET1p13.21412141FCaucasianAdenocarcinoma0/10/1Negative for NRAS, BRAF, HER2, PIK3CA, MAP2K1, and AKT mutations and ALK and ROS1 rearrangements
RUFY2-RET10q21.3912Zheng et al., 20141NANANAAdenocarcinoma0/10/1Negative for aberrations in otder driver genes detectable witd tde system
CUX1-RET7q22.11012149MKoreaAdenocarcinoma (solid)0/10/1Negative for ALK and ROS1 rearrangements
KIAA1468-RET18q21.331012162MJapanAdenocarcinoma (invasive musinous)0/10/1Negative by RNA sequencing
CLIP1-RET12q24.31NANA1NANANANANANANA
ERC1-RET12p13.33NANA1NANANANANANANA
MYO5C-RET15q21.225121NANANAAdenocarcinoma0/1NANegative for ALK rearrangement
EPHA5-RET4q13.1-q13.2NANA1NANANANANANANA
PICALM-RET11q14.2NANA1NANANANANANANA
FRMD4A-RET10p131212Velcheti et al., 2017165FwhiteNon-small cell carcinoma (positive for TTF1 and napsin A, negative for p63 and CK5/6)0/10/1Negative for ALK and ROS1 rearrangements
KIF13A-RET6p22.31812Zhang et al., 2018174FChinaAdenocarcinoma0/1NANegative for ALK and ROS1 rearrangements
WAC-RET10p12.1312Velcheti et al., 2018162FWhiteAdenocarcinoma0/10/1Negative for ALK rearrangement

RET fusions in lung cancer.

Concluding Remarks

REarrangement during Transfection-positive lung cancers constitute a small subset of lung adenocarcinomas showing clinicopathological features similar to those of other fusion kinase-positive lung cancers. Since their discovery, several trials for RET-positive lung cancer have been conducted using kinase inhibitors including vandetanib, cabozantinib, sorafenib, sunitinib, lenvatinib, ponatinib, and dovitinib. Although some clinical benefits were observed, efficacy was limited compared with that shown by EGFR and ALK inhibitors. The above-mentioned agents used in earlier trials are multi-kinase inhibitors, and are notably more effective to VEGFR, EGFR, and KIT than RET. Therefore, off-target dose limiting toxicity caused frequent dose reduction and discontinuation. RET inhibitors with more specificity and hence less off-target toxicity are currently undergoing clinical and preclinical development.

Statements

Author contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Summary

Keywords

ALK, RET, fusion gene, FISH, lung cancer

Citation

Takeuchi K (2019) Discovery Stories of RET Fusions in Lung Cancer: A Mini-Review. Front. Physiol. 10:216. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00216

Received

26 September 2018

Accepted

20 February 2019

Published

19 March 2019

Volume

10 - 2019

Edited by

Masahide Takahashi, Nagoya University, Japan

Reviewed by

Takashi Kohno, National Cancer Center Japan, Japan; Yasushi Yatabe, Aichi Cancer Center, Japan

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Kengo Takeuchi,

This article was submitted to Clinical and Translational Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics