Abstract
Background:
Renal involvement in syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has been retrospectively described, especially acute kidney injury (AKI). However, quantitative proteinuria assessment and its implication in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain unknown.
Methods:
In this prospective, multicenter study in France, we collected clinical and biological data including urinary protein to creatine ratio (UPCR) in patients presenting with moderate to severe COVID-19. Clinical outcome was analyzed according to the level of UPCR.
Results:
42/45 patients (93.3%) had renal involvement (abnormal urinary sediment and/or AKI). Significant proteinuria occurred in 60% of patients. Urine protein electrophoresis showed tubular protein excretion in 83.8% of patients with proteinuria. Inflammatory parametersand D-dimer concentrations correlated with proteinuria level. Patients who required intensive care unit (ICU) admission had higher proteinuria (p = 0.008). On multivariate analysis, proteinuria greater than 0.3 g/g was related to a higher prevalence of ICU admission [OR = 4.72, IC95 (1.16–23.21), p = 0.03], acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [OR = 6.89, IC95 (1.41–53.01, p = 0.02)], nosocomial infections [OR = 3.75, IC95 (1.11–13.55), p = 0.03], longer inpatient hospital stay (p = 0.003).
Conclusion:
Renal involvement is common in moderate to severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Proteinuria at baseline is an independent risk factor for increased hospitalization duration and ICU admission in patients with COVID-19.
Introduction
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a transmitted disease caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It primarily manifests itself as an acute respiratory illness but can affect multiple organs such as kidneys, heart, digestive tract, and nervous system (Wang et al., 2020). In previous reports of SARS and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus, acute kidney injury (AKI) was described in 5 – 15% of patients and was associated with high mortality rates (60–90%) (; ). Recent reports showed renal abnormalities in COVID-19 patients (), but kidney involvement has not been yet well characterized (only retrospective cohorts using urine dip-stick tests) (; Wang et al., 2020). A recent Chinese study also reported that AKI was an independent risk factor for mortality (). However, the exact mechanism of kidney involvement remains unclear: sepsis-related cytokine storm () or direct cellular injury induced by the virus (Sun et al., 2020). Human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor has been identified as the functional receptor for SARS-CoV-2 and is highly expressed in kidneys (; Walls et al., 2020). These data suggest that the kidney might be a target of this SARS-CoV-2 as highlighted in pathological examinations (Su et al., 2020). Reports about the natural course of renal complications during SARS-CoV-2 are scarce, most of them concern only AKI or specific populations (e.g., Chinese) (; ), or kidney transplant recipients (; ; ). We aimed to prospectively identify renal involvement, more especially proteinuria (quantitative) at baseline and its prognosis in a French cohort with moderate to severe SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Materials and Methods
Study Protocol
Multicenter prospective observational study.
Study Approval
Use of routinely collected health data as a current care practice study (NCT04355624).
Patient Population
Inclusion criteria: all patients aged ≥18 years-old with symptomatic proven moderate to severe COVID-19 according to the WHO classification, admitted in one infectious diseases department or in three different intensive care unit (ICU) of Nice University Hospital and Antibes Juan-les-Pins hospital general hospital, between March 15th to April 19th, 2020.
Patients with a history chronic kidney disease and pregnant women were non-included.
Patients with documented urinary tract infection at inclusion were excluded to avoid confusing results.
Data Sources
The demographic characteristics (medical history, clinical symptoms, laboratory data, and medications) were extracted from electronic medical records. Urinary data were collected on urine sample: microalbuminuria, urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR), urine protein electrophoresis, red blood, and white blood cells counts.
Definitions
Proven COVID-19 was defined as a positive SARS-CoV-2 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay in nasopharyngeal swabs.
Severe COVID-19 was defined as respiratory failure or need for mechanical ventilation, shock or organ failure or need for ICU admission.
Acute kidney injury was defined according to KDIGO guidelines.
The date of disease onset was defined as the day of first symptom.
The last day of follow up was the in-hospital death or hospital discharge.
Statistical Analysis
For descriptive statistics, data are presented as median (ranges) or mean ± standard deviation. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test for normal distribution of variable. Comparison of qualitative criteria was performed using Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Comparison of quantitative variables was performed using the Student t-test or Wilcoxon-Mann–Whitney test. Spearman rank-order test was used to find correlations between continuous variables. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression. The multivariate model was built by including variables that met the 20% significance threshold in univariate analysis. Choice among colinear variables was performed using Akaike Iteration Criteria. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of the test. Comparisons for survival curves were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. A p-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, United States) and RStudio [RStudio Team (2019). RStudio. Inc., Boston].
Results
Baseline Characteristics
A total of 45 patients were enrolled and followed for a median of 11 days (5–23 days). Twenty-two patients (49%) developed severe COVID-19 and required ICU admission. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the cohort. Prevalence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus was 37.8 and 26.7%, respectively. Less than 25% of patients were on renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers. Two patients died from SARS-CoV-2 infection: one in the ICU from refractory respiratory failure, one patient died from respiratory failure in conventional unit with DNR order.
TABLE 1
| Variables | All patients (n = 45) | Severe COVID-19 (n = 22) | Non-severe COVID-19 (n = 23) | P-value |
| Clinical characteristics | ||||
| Age, years | 64.0 (48.5–71.5) | 66.0 (58.8–72.0) | 58 (47.0–68.0) | 0.11 |
| Male patients, n (%) | 31.0 (68.9) | 18.0 (81.8) | 13.0 (56.5) | 0.07 |
| Respiratory disease, n (%) | 9.0 (20.0) | 5.0 (22.7) | 4.0 (17.4) | 0.65 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 17.0 (37.8) | 9.0 (40.9) | 8.0 (34.8) | 0.67 |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 12.0 (26.7) | 6.0 (27.3) | 6.0 (26.1) | 0.93 |
| Cardiac disease, n (%) | 5.0 (11.1) | 3.0 (13.6) | 2.0 (8.7) | 0.60 |
| Vascular disease, n (%) | 3.0 (6.7) | 1.0 (45.5) | 2.0 (8.7) | 0.58 |
| Active and former smokers, n (%) | 13.0 (28.9) | 9.0 (39.1) | 4.0 (17.4) | 0.08 |
| Immunosuppression, n (%) | 6.0 (13.3) | 3.0 (13.6) | 3.0 (13) | 0.95 |
| ACE inhibitor, n (%) | 1.0 (22.2) | 1.0 (4.5) | 0.0 | 0.30 |
| ARB, n (%) | 8.0 (17.8) | 2.0 (9.0) | 6.0 (26.1) | 0.14 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.8 (24.3–32.5) | 28.9 (25.0–32.9) | 25.8 (23.4–32.6) | 0.47 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 125.0 (120.0–137.5) | 128.5 (120.0–144.0) | 120.0 (115.0–130.0) | 0.03* |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 75.0 (67.0–80.0) | 80.0 (71.5–80.0) | 70.0 (60.0–80.0) | 0.02* |
| Days from illness onset to admission | 8.0 (5.0–12.0) | 11.0 (6.0–14.0) | 7.0 (4.0–10.0) | 0.03* |
| Biological data | ||||
| Leukocytes, G/L | 5.7 (4.4–8.3) | 7.7 (5–9.3) | 4.9 (4–6.9) | 0.03* |
| Lymphocytes, G/L | 0.9 (0.6–1.2) | 0.7 (0.5–1) | 1 (0.7–1.3) | 0.11 |
| Neutrophils, G/L | 4.7 (3.2–6.8) | 5.9 (4.2–7.9) | 3.4 (2.5–4.9) | 0.008* |
| Hemoglobin, G/L | 13.0 (12.2–14.2) | 13.0 (12.1–14.2) | 13.2 (12.2–14.2) | 0.93 |
| Platelets, G/L | 205.0 (165.5–270.0) | 255.5 (174.8–288.5) | 203.0 (157.0–256.0) | 0.11 |
| D-dimer, ng/ml | 1764.0 (779.0–5689.0) | 4944.0 (1814.0–9374.0) | 913.0 (476.0–1422.0) | <0.001* |
| Fibrinogen, g/l | 7.1 (5.8–8.7) | 7.8 (6.8–9.7) | 5.5 (4.8–7.4) | 0.001* |
| Procalcitonin, ng/ml | 0.2 (0.1–0.5) | 0.4 (0.2–0.8) | 0.1 (0.1–0.3) | 0.002* |
| C-reactive protein, mg/l | 87.8 (57.3–150.9) | 123.3 (80.3–219.2) | 83.6 (41.1–112.8) | 0.02* |
| Lactose deshydrogenase, U/L | 666.0 (488.0–790.5) | 677.0 (490.0–992.3) | 649.0 (470.0–694.0) | 0.15 |
| Sodium, mmol/L | 137.0 (134.0–139.0) | 135.5 (133.0–141.0) | 138.0 (135.0–139.0) | 0.24 |
| Potassium, mmol/l | 4.0 (3.7–4.3) | 4.2 (3.8–4.5) | 3.8 (3.6–4.1) | 0.04* |
| Bicarbonate, mmol/l | 23.0 (22.0–25.0) | 22.0 (20.0–23.3) | 24.0 (23.0–26.0) | 0.003* |
| Albumin, g/l | 28.9 (25.4–32.8) | 27.0 (24.7–30.0) | 30.8 (27.3–34.3) | 0.02* |
| BUN, mmol/l | 5.2 (3.9–7.3) | 4.7 (2.8–6.3) | 3.7 (1.7–4.6) | 0.06 |
| Creatinine, μmol/l | 72.0 (57.0–87.5) | 75.5 (59.3–94.0) | 72.0 (55.0–82.0) | 0.44 |
| eGFR, ml/min per 1.73 m2 | 87 (82–101) | 89 (80–97) | 87 (82–106) | 0.45 |
| Renal involvement | ||||
| AKI, n (%) | 12.0 (26.7) | 8.0 (36.4) | 4.0 (17.4) | 0.15 |
| KDIGO 1 | 6/12 (50.0) | 4/8 (50) | 2/4 (50) | |
| KDIGO 2 | 4/12 (33.3) | 2/8 (25) | 2/4 (50) | |
| KDIGO 3 | 2/12 (16.7) | 2/8 (25) | 0 | |
| RRT | 2/12 (16.7) | 2/8 (25) | 0 | |
| Proteinuria, g/g | 0.50 ± 0.47 | 0.59 ± 0.40 | 0.42 ± 0.53 | 0.008* |
| Proteinuria >0.3 g/g, n (%) | 27 (60.0) | 17 (77.3) | 10 (43.5) | 0.02* |
| Non-albumin proteinuria, n (%) | 37 (82.2) | 18 (81.8) | 19 (82.6) | 0.94 |
| Microalbuminuria, n (%) | 5 (11.1) | 3 (13.6) | 2 (8.7) | 0.6 |
| Hematuria, n (%) | 21 (46.7) | 12 (54.5) | 9 (39.1) | 0.3 |
| Leukocyturia, n (%) | 21 (46.7) | 13 (59.1) | 8 (34.8) | 0.10 |
| Normoglycemic glycosuria, n (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Treatment | ||||
| Steroids, n (%) | 22 (48.9) | 17 (77.3) | 5 (21.7) | <0.001* |
| Antibiotics, n (%) | 21 (46.7) | 17 (77.3) | 4 (17.4) | 0.001* |
| Lopinavir/Ritonavir, n (%) | 3 (6.7) | 3 (13.6) | 0 | 0.07 |
| Hydroxychloroquine, n (%) | 17 (37.8) | 14 (63.6) | 3 (13.0) | <0.001* |
| Tocilizumab, n (%) | 1 (2.2) | 1 (4.5) | 0 | 0.97 |
| Vasopressor, n (%) | 12 (26.7) | 12 (54.5) | 12 (52.2) | 0.001* |
| Invasive ventilation, n (%) | 15 (33.3) | 15 (68.1) | 0 | 0.001* |
| Outcome | ||||
| Nosocomial infection, n (%) | 15 (33.3) | 13 (59.1) | 2 (8.7) | <0.001* |
| In-hospital death, n (%) | 2 (4.4) | 1 (4.5) | 1 (4.3) | 0.97 |
| Length of stay, days | 11 (5–23) | 23 (14–32) | 7 (5–11) | 0.001* |
Clinical and biological characteristics of the cohort.
ACE, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blockers; BMI, body mass index; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; AKI, acute kidney injury; RRT, renal replacement therapy. *Significant, P < 0.05.
Renal Involvement
On admission, 93.3% of patients (42 of 45) presented with renal involvement.
Urine Sediment Abnormalities
Significant proteinuria (>0.3 g/g) occurred in 27 patients (60%) with a mean of 0.50 ± 0.47 g/g (77.3% patients in the severe disease group versus 43% in the non-severe group, p = 0.02). Higher UPCR was observed in patients with severe COVID-19 (0.59 ± 0.40 versus 0.42 ± 0.53 g/g, p = 0.008). Urine protein electrophoresis showed non-albumin proteinuria excretion in 77.7% of patients with significant proteinuria. Inflammatory variables, D-dimers and length of hospital stay were correlated with the level of proteinuria (Supplementary Table 1).
Acute Kidney Injury
The incidence of AKI in the overall cohort was 26.7% (12 of 45 patients) according to KDIGO definition (Table 1). Stage 1 AKI accounted for 50% (6/12 patients with AKI), stage 2 comprised 33.3% (4/12), and 16.7% (2/12) reached stage 3 and required renal replacement therapy (RRT). Among patients with AKI: proteinuria, hematuria and leukocyturia were not different compared with non-AKI patients (Supplementary Table 2). Mortality was not different between AKI and non-AKI patients. Among patients in whom AKI developed, 50% recovered.
Impact of Proteinuria in SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Patients who required ICU admission had significantly higher level of proteinuria (0.59 ± 0.40 versus 0.42 ± 0.53 g/g, p = 0.008).
Patients with significant proteinuria defined as proteinuria above 0.3 g/g had a longer hospital stay [19 days (9–31) versus 7 days (5–11), p = 0.001], a higher prevalence of nosocomial infection (48.1 versus 11.1%, p = 0.01) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (48.1 versus 11.1%, p = 0.01) but mortality was not significantly higher (p = 0.24) (Table 2). Using univariate and multivariate analyses, proteinuria was related to a higher prevalence of ICU admission, ARDS and nosocomial infection (Table 3). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly longer hospitalization duration for patients with a significant proteinuria (Figure 1). For in-hospital mortality and AKI, proteinuria was not an independent predictor (Table 3).
TABLE 2
| Variable | Proteinuria (n = 27) | No proteinuria (n = 18) | P-value |
| Age, years | 66.0 (49.0–72.0) | 61.0 (43.5–68.3) | 0.18 |
| Male patients, n (%) | 22 (81.5) | 9 (50.0) | 0.03* |
| Day from illness onset to admission, days | 9.0 (5.0–11.0) | 8.0 (5.5–12.5) | 0.83 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmgh | 127.0 (120.0–140.0) | 120.0 (120.0–130.0) | 0.40 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmgh | 80.0 (70.0–80.0) | 70.0 (60.0–80.0) | 0.54 |
| Respiratory disease, n (%) | 7 (25.9) | 2 (11.1) | 0.22 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 11 (40.7) | 6 (33.3) | 0.62 |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 10 (37.0) | 2 (11.1) | 0.05 |
| Cardiac disease, n (%) | 3 (11.1) | 2 (11.1) | 1 |
| Vascular disease, n (%) | 3 (11.1) | 0 | 0.14 |
| Active and former smokers, n (%) | 9 (33.3) | 4 (22.2) | 0.42 |
| ACEI, n (%) | 1 (3.7) | 0 | 0.41 |
| ARB, n (%) | 3 (0.11) | 5 (27.8) | 0.15 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 26.5 (24.3–32.9) | 28.3 (24.1–32.6) | 0.74 |
| C Reactive protein, mg/l | 112.8 (75.1–168.1) | 51.6 (81.2–104.0) | 0.04* |
| Procaciltonin, ng/ml | 0.3 (0.1–0.7) | 0.2 (0.1–0.4) | 0.27 |
| D–Dimer ng/ml | 4349.0 (1701.0–6828.0) | 779.0 (472.0–1501.0) | <0.001* |
| AKI, n (%) | 9 (33.3) | 3 (16.7) | 0.22 |
| ICU admission, n (%) | 17 (62.9) | 5 (27.8) | 0.02* |
| ARDS, n (%) | 13 (48.1) | 2 (11.1) | 0.01* |
| Length of stay, days | 19 (9.0–31.0) | 6.5 (4.8–11.3) | 0.001* |
| Nosocomial infection, n (%) | 13 (48.1) | 2 (11.1) | 0.01* |
| In-hospital death, n (%) | 2 (7.4) | 0 | 0.24 |
Characteristics of patients with and without proteinuria >0.3 g/g.
ACE, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blockers; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrom; BMI, body mass index; AKI, acute kidney injury; ICU, intensive care unit. *Significant, P < 0.05.
TABLE 3
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
| Odds ratio | 95% Confidence interval | P value | Odds ratio | 95% Confidence interval | P value | |
| AKI | 2.33 | 0.57–12.02 | 0.26 | |||
| RRT | 5.33 | 0.48–119.84 | 0.18 | |||
| ARDS | 6.96 | 1.55–49.87 | 0.02* | 6.89 | 1.41–53.01 | 0.02* |
| ICU admission | 4.08 | 1.15–16.19 | 0.03* | 4.72 | 1.16–23.21 | 0.03* |
| Vasopressor | 11.0 | 1.82–213.24 | 0.03* | 12.32 | 1.83–254.97 | 0.03* |
| Nosocomial infection | 6.96 | 1.56–49.87 | 0.02* | 3.75 | 1.11–13.55 | 0.03* |
| In-hospital death | 4.17 | 0.63–34.32 | 0.13 | |||
Association between significant proteinuria and outcomes.
AKI, acute kidney injury; RRT, renal replacement therapy; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; ICU, intensive care unit. *Significant, P < 0.05.
FIGURE 1
Discussion
Among the 45 patients prospectively analyzed in the present study, a high proportion presented renal involvement. Proteinuria at baseline was associated with poor outcome in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our data are consistent with a recent retrospective study among 333 patients in China (). Our study confirmed that kidney involvement is common in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, but not only in severe cases. AKI has been previously described as associated with in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 () and renal complications in COVID-19 remains associated with poor outcome (). To our knowledge, this is the first study using quantitative assessment of urinary protein excretion and identifying proteinuria as a factor associated with poor outcome in COVID-19 (higher prevalence of ARDS, nosocomial infection, ICU admission). Furthermore, we could show that a significant proteinuria (i.e., above 0.3 g/g) was associated with a higher risk of ICU admission, developing ARDS, requiring vasopressor, developing nosocomial infections. Proteinuria higher than 0.3 g/g was a predictor for length of stay. Similar results have been described in a retrospective cohort with bacterial community-acquired pneumonia () but also in non-infectious diseases such as cirrhosis () or lung cancer ().
The tubular profile of kidney involvement we describe is consistent with recent pathologic reports (Su et al., 2020). The analysis of 26 autopsies from COVID-19 patients showed diffuse proximal tubule injury with the loss of brush border, non-isometric vacuolar degeneration, necrosis; hyaline casts and microthrombi were also observed. Interestingly, in this study, some patients did not present AKI according to KDIGO definition suggesting subclinical kidney injury. Proteinuria appears as a sensitive tool, comparing to creatinine and/or BUN, for renal assessment in COVID-19, even in subclinical kidney injury.
In our study, hematuria and leukocyturia were present in almost half of the patients but we found no difference between severe and non-severe COVID-19. Our results suggest an interstitial participation in kidney. Histopathologic reports did not show interstitial inflammation but 61.5% of patients had steroids before kidney biopsy was performed (and data are not available for 23% of patients) (Su et al., 2020). Even if a case of collapsing glomerulopathy has been reported in COVID-19 (), acute tubular necrosis (ATN) with interstitial component probably remains the main cause of kidney injury. Other factors may contribute to kidney involvement: systemic inflammation and cytokine storm (; ; ; ; ; Thorevska et al., 2003; ; Wassmann et al., 2004; ; ; ; ; ; ; , ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Tang et al., 2020; Vaninov, 2020; Zhang et al., 2020; ), release of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), high levels of damage-associated molecular proteins (DAMPS) from lung injury and severe hypoxemic respiratory failure (; ; ; ; Thorevska et al., 2003; ; Wassmann et al., 2004; ; ; ; ; , ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Tang et al., 2020; Vaninov, 2020; Zhang et al., 2020; ). All these factors could also lead to tissue factor release and the hypercoagulate state described in SARS-COV-2 infection (; Tang et al., 2020). In our cohort, D-dimer correlated with higher proteinuria and severe disease. Moreover, reports suggested that patients with COVID-19 presented an increased risk for thrombosis or microangiopathy in autopsy reports (Tang et al., 2020). This hypercoagubility might participate in kidney involvement in COVID-19.
Proximal tubules injury has been described (Su et al., 2020), but our results don’t support Fanconi’s syndrome. Microalbuminuria was present in 11.1% of the cohort. High prevalence of microalbuminuria has been described in critically ill patients and is associated with mortality (Thorevska et al., 2003) but here, no difference was found in microalbuminuria according to disease severity. This is the reason why we focused on significant proteinuria. Immunostaining with SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein antibody was found positive in tubules and podocytes (Su et al., 2020). One mechanism of kidney impairment may be direct viral infection of renal epithelium, but not all biopsy specimens found viral genetic material and cytopathic effects (). Mechanisms for proteinuria may result from a defect in proximal tubular resorption and also from impairment of glomerular permeability due to pathophysiologic changes due to pro-inflammatory cytokines (). Proteinuria in COVID 19 could not be differentiate from febrile proteinuria. As in septic state, proteinuria could be predictive of ICU survival. We found higher C-reactive protein levels with higher proteinuria, SARS-CoV-2 infection is known to induce cytokines storm and this pro-inflammatory disorder has been associated with severity and poor outcome (; Vaninov, 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). Pro-inflammatory cytokines might play a role as previously explored in AKI (; ) but not in proteinuria. Interestingly, the entire cohort was studied during the hyperinflammatory phase of the disease (). These facts can support the relation with proteinuria and cytokine storm in SARS-CoV-2 infection. As described previously, inflammatory cytokines IL1β, IL6, IL8, and TNFα increased in the plasma of moderate and severe COVID-19 patients (). Cytokine storm may contribute to COVID-19 AKI by cooperating with renal resident cells and promoting tubular and endothelial dysfunction. Previous studies described a relevant role for IL6 (). Interleukin-6 can lead renal endothelial cells to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, and can induce kidney vascular permeability, acting in microcirculatory dysfunction. Pro-inflammatory cytokines can also induce capillary leak syndrome and the production of thrombosis. Interestingly, IL6 could be produced by renal resident cells, including podocytes (; ; ; ; Wassmann et al., 2004; ; ; ; ; ; ; ), mesangial cells (; ), endothelial cells (Wassmann et al., 2004) and tubular epithelial cells (; ). All these cells would actively respond to IL6 (). Moreover, plasma and urinary IL6 concentrations correlated with proteinuria in acute Hantavirus-induced nephritis () and increased IL6 plasma levels and a TH17 profile have already been described in glomerular diseases such as membranous nephropathy ().
This study has several limitations. One is the number of patients studied, nevertheless all consecutive patients were prospectively screened in different wards and hospitals strengthening the results obtained. This small sample size could explain our non-significative results on correlating proteinuria to AKI and mortality. Secondly, we could not detect SARS-CoV-2 in urine samples but this is not performed routinely and kidney involvement in SARS-CoV-2 infection seems multifactorial and not only due to viral infection. Last, we did not have renal histopathological data to correlate to biological data since there were no formal indication for kidney biopsy.
Nevertheless, our study is prospective and multicentric. This is the first conducted in an European population. Differences have been described between Caucasian and Asian populations in kidney disease and also in ACE2 expression (). We used quantitative urinary protein excretion that is more accurate but still an easy and inexpensive test in contrast with other urinary markers.
In conclusion, kidney involvement in SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and not only in severe forms. Renal impairment in SARS-CoV-2 infection and more precisely proteinuria is an independent predictor for length of stay and admission to the ICU. Proteinuria is an easily measurable marker to predict outcome and may be used to assess the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Evidence suggest that proteinuria is a marker of chronic disease progression (; ). In SARS-CoV-2 infection, quantitative proteinuria should be monitored at admission and during follow-up, even in patients without AKI or severe disease to assess long-term implication of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Collaborators
Mathieu Buscot: Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France; Clément Saccheri: Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France; Hervé Hyvernat: Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France; Denis Doyen: Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France; Nihal Martis: Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France; Yanis Kouchit: Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France; Thomas Citti: Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France; Éric Cua: Service d’Infectiologie, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France; Véronique Mondain: Service d’Infectiologie, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France; David Chirio: Service d’Infectiologie, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France; Karine Risso: Service d’Infectiologie, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France; Philippe Deswardt: Service de Réanimation CH Antibes-Juan les Pins, Antibes, France; Cécilia Benard: Service de Réanimation CH Antibes-Juan les Pins, Antibes, France; Marine Clavaud: Département de réanimation médico-chirugicale et anesthésie, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France; Abdlazize Sahraoui: Département de réanimation médico-chirugicale et anesthésie, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France; Thibaud Chapelle: Département de réanimation médico-chirugicale et anesthésie, CHU de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, Nice, France.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Ethics statement
Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
HO, SB-S, and JD designed the study and drafted and revised the manuscript. HO, LM, JC, JF, VB, RL, and ED collected clinical and biological data. HO, LM, and SB-S analyzed and interpreted the data. HO, JC, LM, JF, VB, RL, VE, BS-P, ED, JD, and SB-S provided medical oversight. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors greatly appreciate all the hospital staff from Nice, Antibes, Cannes, and Grasse for their efforts in recruiting and treating patients and thank all patients involved in this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.611772/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AbbateM.ZojaC.RemuzziG. (2006). How does proteinuria cause progressive renal damage?J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.172974–2984. 10.1681/asn.2006040377
2
AkalinE.AzziY.BartashR.SeethamrajuH.ParidesM.HemmigeV.et al (2020). Covid-19 and kidney transplantation.N. Engl. J. Med.3822475–2477. 10.1056/NEJMc2011117
3
AlbericiF.DelbarbaE.ManentiC.EconimoL.ValerioF.PolaA.et al (2020). A single center observational study of the clinical characteristics and short-term outcome of 20 kidney transplant patients admitted for SARS-CoV2 pneumonia.Kidney Int.971083–1088. 10.1016/j.kint.2020.04.002
4
BanerjeeD.PopoolaJ.ShahS.SterI. C.QuanV.PhanishM. (2020). COVID-19 infection in kidney transplant recipients.Kidney Int.971076–1082. 10.1016/j.kint.2020.03.018
5
BurtonC.HarrisK. P. (1996). The role of proteinuria in the progression of chronic renal failure.Am. J. Kidney Dis.27765–775. 10.1016/s0272-6386(96)90512-0
6
ChaR.-H.JohJ.-S.JeongI.LeeJ. Y.ShinH.-S.KimG.et al (2015). Renal complications and their prognosis in korean patients with middle east respiratory syndrome-coronavirus from the central MERS-CoV designated hospital.J. Korean Med. Sci.301807–1814. 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.12.1807
7
ChengY.LuoR.WangK.ZhangM.WangZ.DongL.et al (2020). Kidney disease is associated with in-hospital death of patients with COVID-19.Kidney Int.97829–838. 10.1016/j.kint.2020.03.005
8
ChuK. H.TsangW. K.TangC. S.LamM. F.LaiF. M.ToK. F.et al (2005). Acute renal impairment in coronavirus-associated severe acute respiratory syndrome.Kidney Int.67698–705.
9
ColettaI.SoldoL.PolentaruttiN.ManciniF.GuglielmottiA.PinzaM.et al (2000). Selective induction of MCP-1 in human mesangial cells by the IL-6/sIL-6R complex.Nephron Exp. Nephrol.1437–43. 10.1159/000059327
10
CremoniM.BrglezV.PerezS.DecoupignyF.ZorziK.AndreaniM.et al (2020). Th17-Immune response in patients with membranous nephropathy is associated with thrombosis and relapses.Front. Immunol.11:574997. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.574997
11
D’AmicoG.BazziC. (2003). Pathophysiology of proteinuria.Kidney Int.63809–825. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00840.x
12
DarmonM.Clec’hC.AdrieC.ArgaudL.AllaouchicheB.AzoulayE.et al (2014). Acute respiratory distress syndrome and risk of AKI among critically Ill patients.Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.91347–1353.
13
DarmonM.LegrandM.TerziN. (2017). Understanding the kidney during acute respiratory failure.Intens. Care Med.431144–1147. 10.1007/s00134-016-4532-z
14
DelvaeyeM.ConwayE. M. (2009). Coagulation and innate immune responses: can we view them separately?Blood172367–2374. 10.1182/blood-2009-05-199208
15
GaillardF.IsmaelS.SannierA.TarhiniH.VolpeT.GrezeC.et al (2020). Tubuloreticular inclusions in COVID-19-related collapsing glomerulopathy.Kidney Int.98:241. 10.1016/j.kint.2020.04.022
16
GohdaT.MakitaY.ShikeT.FunabikiK.ShiratoI.TominoY. (2001). Dilazep hydrochloride, an antiplatelet drug, inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced mouse mesangial cell IL-6 secretion and proliferation.Kidney Blood Press. Res.2433–38. 10.1159/000054203
17
HoffmannM.Kleine-WeberH.SchroederS.KrügerN.HerrlerT.ErichsenS.et al (2020). SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor.Cell181271–280.e8.
18
HsuS.-N.HsuY.-J.LinC.SuS.-L.LinS.-H. (2018). Proteinuria: associated with poor outcome in patients with small cell lung cancer.J. Cancer Res. Ther.14S688–S693.
19
ImaiY. (2003). Injurious mechanical ventilation and end-organ epithelial cell apoptosis and organ dysfunction in an experimental model of acute respiratory distress syndrome.JAMA289:2104. 10.1001/jama.289.16.2104
20
KielarM. L.JohnR.BennettM.RichardsonJ. A.SheltonJ. M.ChenL.et al (2005). Maladaptive role of IL-6 in ischemic acute renal failure.J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.163315–3325. 10.1681/asn.2003090757
21
LinL.-Y.JenqC.-C.LiuC.-S.HuangC.-S.FanP.-C.ChangC.-H.et al (2014). Proteinuria can predict short-term prognosis in critically ill cirrhotic patients.J. Clin. Gastroenterol.48377–382. 10.1097/mcg.0000000000000060
22
LiuK. D.GliddenD. V.EisnerM. D.ParsonsP. E.WareL. B.WheelerA.et al (2007). Predictive and pathogenetic value of plasma biomarkers for acute kidney injury in patients with acute lung injury.Crit. Care Med.352755–2761. 10.1097/01.ccm.0000291649.72238.6d
23
MäkeläS.MustonenJ.Ala-HouhalaI.HurmeM.KoivistoA.-M.VaheriA.et al (2004). Urinary excretion of interleukin-6 correlates with proteinuria in acute Puumala hantavirus-induced nephritis.Am. J. Kidney Dis.43809–816. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.12.044
24
MehtaP.McAuleyD. F.BrownM.SanchezE.TattersallR. S.MansonJ. J. (2020). COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression.Lancet3951033–1034. 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30628-0
25
MeissnerM.ViehmannS. F.KurtsC. (2019). DAMPening sterile inflammation of the kidney.Kidney Int.95489–491. 10.1016/j.kint.2018.12.007
26
MuruganR.Karajala-SubramanyamV.LeeM.YendeS.KongL.CarterM.et al (2010). Acute kidney injury in non-severe pneumonia is associated with an increased immune response and lower survival.Kidney Int.77527–535. 10.1038/ki.2009.502
27
NaickerS.YangC.-W.HwangS.-J.LiuB.-C.ChenJ.-H.JhaV. (2020). The novel coronavirus 2019 epidemic and kidneys.Kidney Int.97824–828. 10.1016/j.kint.2020.03.001
28
PanX.XuD.ZhangH.ZhouW.WangL.CuiX. (2020). Identification of a potential mechanism of acute kidney injury during the COVID-19 outbreak: a study based on single-cell transcriptome analysis.Intensive Care Med.461114–1116. 10.1007/s00134-020-06026-1
29
PeiG.ZhangZ.PengJ.LiuL.ZhangC.YuC.et al (2020). Renal involvement and early prognosis in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.311157–1165. 10.1681/asn.2020030276
30
RanganathanP.JayakumarC.RameshG. (2013). Proximal tubule-specific overexpression of netrin-1 suppresses acute kidney injury-induced interstitial fibrosis and glomerulosclerosis through suppression of IL-6/STAT3 signaling.Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.304F1054–F1065.
31
RossiG. M.DelsanteM.PilatoF. P.GnettiL.GabrielliL.RossiniG.et al (2020). Kidney biopsy findings in a critically ill COVID-19 patient with dialysis-dependent acute kidney injury: a case against “SARS-CoV-2 nephropathy.”.Kidney Int. Rep.51100–1105. 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.05.005
32
RuetschC.BrglezV.CrémoniM.ZorziK.FernandezC.Boyer-SuavetS.et al (2021). Functional exhaustion of Type I and II interferons production in severe COVID-19 patients.Front. Med.7:603961. 10.3389/fmed.2020.603961
33
SarhanM.von MässenhausenA.HugoC.OberbauerR.LinkermannA. (2018). Immunological consequences of kidney cell death.Cell Death Dis.9:114.
34
SiddiqiH. K.MehraM. R. (2020). COVID-19 illness in native and immunosuppressed states: a clinical–therapeutic staging proposal.J. Heart Lung. Transplant.39405–407. 10.1016/j.healun.2020.03.012
35
SpoorenbergS. M. C.MeijvisS. C. A.NavisG.RuvenH. J.BiesmaD. H.GruttersJ. C.et al (2012). Incidence and predictive value of proteinuria in community-acquired pneumonia.Nephron Clin. Pract.12267–74. 10.1159/000348833
36
SuH.LeiC.-T.ZhangC. (2017). Interleukin-6 signaling pathway and its role in kidney disease: an update.Front. Immunol.8:405. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00405
37
SuH.YangM.WanC.YiL.-X.TangF.ZhuH.-Y.et al (2020). Renal histopathological analysis of 26 postmortem findings of patients with COVID-19 in China.Kidney Int.98219–227. 10.1016/j.kint.2020.04.003
38
SunJ.ZhuA.LiH.ZhengK.ZhuangZ.ChenZ.et al (2020). Isolation of infectious SARS-CoV-2 from urine of a COVID-19 patient.Emerg. Microbes Infect.281–8.
39
TangN.LiD.WangX.SunZ. (2020). Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia.J. Thromb Haemost JTH.18844–847. 10.1111/jth.14768
40
ThorevskaN.SabahiR.UpadyaA.ManthousC.Amoateng-AdjepongY. (2003). Microalbuminuria in critically ill medical patients: prevalence, predictors, and prognostic significance.Crit. Care Med.311075–1081. 10.1097/01.ccm.0000059316.90804.0b
41
VaninovN. (2020). In the eye of the COVID-19 cytokine storm.Nat. Rev. Immunol.20:277. 10.1038/s41577-020-0305-6
42
WallsA. C.ParkY.-J.TortoriciM. A.WallA.McGuireA. T.VeeslerD. (2020). Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein.Cell181281–292.e6.
43
WangD.HuB.HuC.ZhuF.LiuX.ZhangJ.et al (2020). Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients With 2019 novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia in wuhan. China.JAMA 17323:1061. 10.1001/jama.2020.1585
44
WassmannS.StumpfM.StrehlowK.SchmidA.SchiefferB.BöhmM.et al (2004). Interleukin-6 induces oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction by overexpression of the angiotensin II Type 1 receptor.Circ. Res.5534–541. 10.1161/01.res.0000115557.25127.8d
45
ZhangC.WuZ.LiJ.-W.ZhaoH.WangG.-Q. (2020). The cytokine release syndrome (CRS) of severe COVID-19 and Interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) antagonist tocilizumab may be the key to reduce the mortality.Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents29:105954. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105954
Summary
Keywords
acute kidney injury, biomarker, COVID-19, proteinuria, SARS-CoV-2, kidney involvement, pronostic and predictive factors
Citation
Ouahmi H, Courjon J, Morand L, François J, Bruckert V, Lombardi R, Esnault V, Seitz-Polski B, Demonchy E, Dellamonica J and Boyer-Suavet S (2021) Proteinuria as a Biomarker for COVID-19 Severity. Front. Physiol. 12:611772. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.611772
Received
29 September 2020
Accepted
08 February 2021
Published
09 March 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Ravi Nistala, University of Missouri, United States
Reviewed by
Theodoros Eleftheriadis, University of Thessaly, Greece; Carlos A. Flores, Centro de Estudios Científicos, Chile
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Ouahmi, Courjon, Morand, François, Bruckert, Lombardi, Esnault, Seitz-Polski, Demonchy, Dellamonica and Boyer-Suavet.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sonia Boyer-Suavet, boyer-suavet.s@chu-nice.fr
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Renal and Epithelial Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.