Serum Creatinine-to-Cystatin C Ratio in the Progression Monitoring of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Abstract

Background:

The simultaneous assessment of visceral adiposity and muscle mass might be useful to monitor the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) progression in large population. We aimed to investigate the value of serum creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio (CCR) in evaluating these two parameters and predicting liver steatosis and fibrosis.

Methods:

154 overweight/obese inpatients (49 males, 105 females) scheduled for bariatric surgery and 49 non-overweight/obese volunteers (18 males, 31 females) responded to the hospital advertisement were involved in the cross-sectional study. Liver steatosis and fibrosis were diagnosed with transient elastography (TE). The psoas muscle area (PMA) and visceral fat area (VFA) were measured using magnetic resonance imaging.

Results:

The body mass index, insulin resistance, and lipid profiles showed significant differences between the CCR tertiles. Multiple regression analyses revealed that the CCR was significantly associated with the controlled attenuation parameter (β = −0.30, P = 0.006 in males; β = −0.19, P = 0.017 in females) and liver stiffness measurements in males (β = −0.246, P = 0.044). A low CCR was associated with moderate-to-severe steatosis (P < 0.001), significant liver fibrosis (P < 0.01), and excellent predictive power for these two conditions (P < 0.01). The CCR had a negative correlation with the VFA/PMA ratio (r = −0.584, P < 0.001 in males; r = −0.569, P < 0.001 in females).

Conclusions:

The CCR is a serum marker for muscle-adjusted visceral fat mass, and a low CCR is associated with an increased risk of progressive NAFLD.

Introduction

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide (Younossi et al., 2016). The global prevalence of NAFLD is reported to be 24–30% and increases together with that of obesity and diabetes mellitus (Fan et al., 2017). In 10–22% of patients, NAFLD progresses to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, which is associated with high mortality from numerous liver and cardiovascular diseases (Bazick et al., 2015). To date, no pharmacotherapy exists for NAFLD. Therefore, it would be significant to identify high-risk NAFLD patients early and intensive monitoring of disease progression.

Obesity, particularly visceral obesity, is a major risk factor for the development and progression of NAFLD (Kim et al., 2016). However, about one in six NAFLD patients has a normal weight (Younossi et al., 2012). Therefore, the absolute amount of (visceral) fat mass might not adequately reflect the risk of NAFLD. Meanwhile, recent studies suggested that low muscle mass also contributes to the risk of NAFLD progression and severe liver fibrosis (Koo et al., 2017; Petta et al., 2017). Lower muscle mass can induce visceral fat accumulation and insulin resistance because of its key role in glucose homeostasis (Kim et al., 2018). Thus, simultaneous measurements of visceral fat and muscle mass might be an effective method for early screening and intensive monitoring of high-risk NAFLD populations.

Cross-sectional imaging at the level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3) was recommended by the National Institutes of Health to assess whole-body composition (Gomez-Perez et al., 2016). The psoas muscle area (PMA) has been shown to be an effective estimate of overall muscle mass and prognostic biomarker for poor health outcomes (e.g., all-cause mortality) (Mamane et al., 2016). However, the need for special equipment limits its clinical application. The serum creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio (CCR, also Sarcopenia Index) was first reported in 2013 and validated in subsequent studies as a biomarker of muscle mass (Tetsuka et al., 2013; Kashani et al., 2017; Barreto et al., 2019). Serum creatinine levels are proportional to muscle mass in patients with normal renal function (Barreto et al., 2019). Cystatin C is produced by all cells at a constant rate but shows elevated levels in obese individuals due to the enlarged visceral fat (Köttgen et al., 2008). Hence, the CCR might simultaneously reflect body visceral fat and muscle mass, but its ability to assess both these body components has not been established in studies. Furthermore, the relationship between the CCR and the course of disease in NAFLD is unknown to date. Therefore, we aimed to investigate a potential association of CCR with the degree of steatosis and fibrosis in NAFLD and body composition in a Chinese population.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

This cross-sectional study involved 49 non-overweight/obese volunteers (18 males and 31 females) and 154 overweight/obese inpatients (49 males and 105 females). Among the inpatients scheduled for an upcoming bariatric surgery at our institution between February 2019 and April 2020, 169 inpatients aged 18–67 years old were eligible for this study. After applying the following inclusion criteria: normal renal function (creatine ≤115 μmol/L, glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min, without hemodialysis), 162 inpatients were included. Based on the exclusion criteria: (1) liver disease of different or mixed etiologies (excessive alcohol intake, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, autoimmune liver disease, etc.); (2) use of steatosis-inducing drugs or immunosuppressive drugs; (3) pregnancy, abnormal thyroid function, or malignant disease. We excluded eight patients. We also recruited 49 healthy volunteers with normal weight who responded to the hospital advertisements. Consequently, we enrolled 154 inpatients and 49 volunteers with or without NAFLD in the study.

Clinical and Laboratory Assessments

All subjects completed a questionnaire about their demographics and health (such as age, medical history, and drinking of alcohol history). Height and body weight were measured with a digital scale. The waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest. The BMI was calculated as body weight (kg) divided by height squared (m²). Blood pressure was measured after 5 min of rest.

A 12-h overnight fasting blood sample was drawn from an antecubital vein to determine the liver enzymes, lipid profile, kidney function, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and insulin serum concentrations in all subjects. Serum creatinine levels were assessed with the sarcosine oxidase method, and cystatin C was measured using an immunonephelometric assay. The CCR was then calculated as the serum creatine concentration (μmol/L) divided by the cystatin C concentration (mg/L). Based on the above data, we calculated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (Matthews et al., 1985) and determined the fatty liver index, Fibrosis-4 index, NAFLD fibrosis score, and BARD score as previously described (Vilar-Gomez and Chalasani, 2018).

Psoas Muscle Area and Visceral Fat Measurement

All subjects were examined in the supine position with the Achieva 3.0T MRI system (Philips Healthcare, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). A medically trained technician selected one 10-mm slice at the L3 level with good contrast for the PMA and visceral fat area (VFA) measurements using the sliceOmatic 5.0 software (TomoVision, Magog, Canada). The software calculates areas of different tissues and expresses the measurements in cm² based on the previously reported method (Shen et al., 2004).

Controlled Attenuation Parameter and Liver Stiffness Measurement

The controlled attenuation parameter (CAP, in dB/m) and liver stiffness measurements (LSM, in kPa) were captured simultaneously by using the FibroScan^® (Echosens, Paris, France) equipped with M- or XL-probes to assess liver steatosis and stiffness. Details of this examination have been described in previous publications (Sasso et al., 2012; Koehler et al., 2016). Fasted subjects were lying supine with their right hand on their head and were examined by one well-trained sonographer who was blinded to the subjects’ underlying liver conditions. CAP was only calculated when the liver stiffness measurement was valid in order to ensure an accurate attenuation. A reliable LSM was defined using the following 3 criteria: (1) more than 10 valid shots; (2) a success rate (SR: the ratio of valid shots to the total number of shots) of at least 60%; and (3) a ratio of the interquartile range (IQR) of liver stiffness to median value (IQR/M) <30%.

Definitions Used in This Study

Type 2 diabetes was defined as a fasting glucose level ≥7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dL), HbA1c ≥6.5%, or taking antidiabetic medications (American Diabetes Association, 2018). Overweight (BMI ≥ 24.0 to BMI < 28.0) and obesity (BMI ≥ 28.0) were determined in accordance with the standard definitions proposed by the Working Group on Obesity in China (Zhou, 2002). NAFLD was defined as the presence of at least two of three abnormal findings on abdominal ultrasonography without evidence of any possible causes of liver diseases according to the diagnostic guidelines for NAFLD in the Asia-Pacific region: hepatorenal echo contrast, deep attenuation, and vascular blurring (Farrell et al., 2007). For this study, moderate-to-severe steatosis was defined as a CAP value greater than 268 dB/m (Tsai and Lee, 2018), significant liver fibrosis was defined as the presence of steatosis and LSM ≥8.0 kPa (Roulot et al., 2017; Alferink et al., 2019).

Statistical Analyses

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States) and GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, United States). All data were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Categorical variables were presented as number (percentages). Continuous variables with normal and non-normal distributions were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and medians (IQR), respectively. We performed subgroup analyzes for the CCR tertiles by sex as follows to avoid potential sex influences: for males, lowest tertile <75.56; middle tertile 75.56–100.00; highest tertile >100.00; for females, lowest tertile <68.89; middle tertile 68.89–98.00; highest tertile >98.00.

Differences between groups were assessed using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and the One-way ANOVA analysis or Kruskal-Wallis Test for continuous factors. Parameters associated with CAP and LSM were identified by multiple stepwise linear regression analysis. Logistic regression models were used to analyze a potential association of CCR with moderate-to-severe steatosis (CAP > 268 dB/m) and significant liver fibrosis (LSM ≥ 8.0 kPa). The ability of CCR to identify these liver conditions was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Correlation coefficients were calculated using simple linear regression analysis to assess the associations of CCR with the TE and abdominal MRI measurements. A P-value < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

Results

Comparison of Anthropometric and Metabolic Characteristics Between Subjects in Different CCR Tertiles

Compared with the subjects in the lowest CCR tertile, those in the middle and highest CCR tertile had statistically significantly lower BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, cystatin C, FPG, triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HOMA-IR, HbA1c, serum insulin levels and prevalence of lifestyle-related diseases (P < 0.001), including NAFLD, type 2 diabetes, and obesity (Table 1). Conversely, serum creatinine and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) were significantly higher in the middle and highest CCR tertile compared to the lowest. Moreover, the VFA and VFA/PMA ratio were significantly higher in the lowest CCR tertile than the middle and highest tertile, while the PMA did not differ significantly among the three groups.

Liver Function, Steatosis, and Fibrosis in Subjects Within the Different CCR Tertiles

Compared to the subjects in the lowest CCR tertile, subjects in the middle and highest CCR tertile presented with lower CAP and LSM and lower aspartate transaminase, alanine aminotransferase, and γ-glutamyl transferase levels, meaning that the most severe liver steatosis, fibrosis, and/or inflammation was present in the lowest CCR tertile (Table 1). Further analysis revealed that the fatty liver index, NAFLD fibrosis score, Fibrosis-4 index, and BARD score were statistically significantly higher in subjects in the lowest CCR tertile than in the middle and highest tertile.

NAFLD-Related Factors Associated With CAP and LSM in Males and Females

Multivariate linear regression identified HDL-c, HOMA-IR, CCR, and TC as independent determinants of CAP in males, whereas TG, HDL-c, alanine aminotransferase, and CCR were independently associated with CAP in females (Table 2). The CCR was an independent factor affecting LSM in males but not in females.

Risk of Liver Steatosis and Fibrosis of Subjects Within the Different Tertiles of CCR

Table 3 shows that if the risk of moderate-to-severe steatosis in the highest tertile was one, the relative risks were 8.346 (95% CI 3.654–19.066) in the middle tertile and 31.238 (95% CI 8.918–109.42) in the lowest tertile (unadjusted model). Moreover, the relative risks for significant liver fibrosis using the highest tertile as the reference were 3.481 (95% CI 1.416–8.560) in the middle tertile and 4.256 (95% CI 1.747–10.366) in the lowest tertile (unadjusted model). The results of the Model 1 and Model 2 analyses were similar, indicating that a CCR in the middle and lower tertile was an independent risk factor for liver steatosis and fibrosis in our subjects.

CCR Cut-Off Value to Identify Liver Steatosis and Fibrosis

The ROC curve analysis of CCR cut-off values indicating moderate-to-severe steatosis and significant liver fibrosis in males and females is shown in Figure 1. For moderate-to-severe steatosis, the cut-off value with the highest Youden index was a CCR of 94.44, with a sensitivity of 0.750 and a specificity of 1.000 in males, whereas the CCR cut-off value was 95.71 (sensitivity 0.814, specificity 0.795) in females. The CCR had acceptable power in males (AUC = 0.724, P < 0.001) and females (AUC = 0.653, P = 0.007) to identify significant liver fibrosis, with a cut-off value of 94.44 in males (sensitivity 0.846, specificity 0.585) and 73.33 in females (sensitivity 0.667, specificity 0.670).

FIGURE 1

Correlation of CCR With the Measurements of TE and Abdominal MRI

As shown in Figure 2, VFA/PMA ratio exhibited the largest correlation coefficient with the CCR than BMI and VFA in both males and females. The PMA was significantly associated with the CCR in females (r = −0.229, P = 0.007) but not in males. If males and females had a similar CCR, males tended to have a higher BMI, more visceral fat, and more muscle mass, but the VFA/PMA ratio between male and female was almost equal, which is manifested by the almost overlap of the linear regression cures. The CAP and LSM were significantly negatively correlated with the CCR, regardless of sex. In males and females with a similar CCR, males tended to have a higher CAP and LSM, indicating a sex difference in the association of the CCR with NAFLD.

FIGURE 2

Discussion

This study was the first to investigate the relation between the CCR and liver steatosis and fibrosis. We found that a low CCR is significantly associated with high risk of moderate-to-severe steatosis and significant liver fibrosis both in males and females. This association remained significant even after adjustment for potential confounding factors. Moreover, our results indicate that the CCR is more suitable as a marker of muscle-adjusted visceral fat mass than measuring muscle mass, which supports the utility of the CCR in the monitoring of NAFLD.

Currently, the CCR is proposed as a marker of body muscle mass and sarcopenia. The association of the CCR with muscle mass and clinical outcomes (e.g., malnutrition, frailty, and hospital length of stay) has been reported in recent studies (Kashani et al., 2017; Barreto et al., 2019; Tabara et al., 2020). However, our study provides a new insight in that CCR is superior to muscle mass as a marker of muscle-adjusted visceral fat mass. In our study, subjects within the lowest CCR tertile exhibited a remarkable range of adiposity-associated characteristics, such as a high BMI, large waist circumference, and disorders of glucose and lipid metabolism. Importantly, the CCR had a highly negative correlation with the VFA/PMA ratio both in males and females, but the PMA did not show such relationship. The almost identical linear regression curves for the VFA/PMA ratio and CCR in both males and females further support the possibility of using the CCR as a biomarker for muscle-adjusted visceral fat mass. Previous studies have mainly focused on non-obese patients with small BMI ranges, which means the influence of skeletal muscle mass was potentially larger than that of visceral fat. Our subjects had a wide BMI range, which further highlights the significant role of visceral fat in the CCR. Moreover, changes in the number of visceral fat cells are the main source of changes in the number of whole-body cells in the adult, which are closely related to visceral fat accumulation (Spalding et al., 2008; Arner et al., 2010). Inflammation and oxidative stress, mainly induced by visceral fat accumulation, can increase the expression and secretion of cystatin C (Neeland et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2015). Overall, we hypothesize that visceral fat mass is the determinant of CCR, whereas muscle mass is more of an important correcting factor due to its inherent antagonistic function to visceral fat.

A recent cross-sectional study (Shida et al., 2018) reported that decreased skeletal muscle mass to VFA ratio was closely associated with an increased risk of moderate to severe steatosis and advanced fibrosis. The longitudinal study conducted by Mizuno et al. (2019) further demonstrated that an increase in the ratio of skeletal muscle mass to body fat mass was correlated with a reduction in liver fat accumulation and liver damage. In our study, the subjects within the lowest CCR tertile presented the highest risk of moderate-to-severe liver steatosis and significant liver fibrosis. In addition, CCR was negatively correlated with CAP and LSM in both males and females, which further underlines the ability of CCR to predict steatosis and fibrosis. There are multiple interactions between muscle and visceral fat in the onset and progression of NAFLD. Chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and excessive free fatty acid level in the blood caused by visceral fat accumulation have various adverse effects on the liver and muscle metabolism, including impaired insulin sensitivity, dyslipidemia, and liver cell apoptosis (Stinkens et al., 2015; Kalinkovich and Livshits, 2017). Sufficient muscle mass can alleviate hepatic lipid accumulation by reducing free fatty acid levels in the blood and plays a key role in regulating glucose homeostasis in the body (Gemmink et al., 2020). Moreover, changes in myokine concentrations (e.g., irisin, interleukin-15, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor) may also play a critical role in NAFLD (Pedersen and Febbraio, 2012). It is worth noting that metabolically obese normal-weight populations and the elderly have a significant increase in NAFLD prevalence and liver fibrosis risk (Younossi et al., 2012, 2016). Exploring the associations between CCR and NAFLD by combining visceral fat and muscle mass measurements in these two groups may further our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms and assist in the timely identification of high-risk groups.

One strength of this study is that the CCR can be obtained by blood sampling and evaluates muscle-adjusted visceral fat mass at a lower cost than MRI, computed tomography, and other methods, which is a significant advantage for NAFLD risk monitoring in large populations. However, there were several limitations to this study. First, the cross-sectional design of the study made it impossible to identify causal or temporal relationships between the CCR and NAFLD. Further prospective research is warranted to confirm a potential causal relationship. Second, we did not consider the determination of exercise, dietary intake of meat, or medications, such as cimetidine. These factors may change creatinine levels and possibly influence the CCR. Finally, the gold standard for the diagnosis of NAFLD is liver biopsy rather than ultrasonography. However, a liver biopsy is invasive and may have complications. Moreover, ultrasound is a widely used screening tool with high sensitivity and specificity for moderate and severe steatosis (Dasarathy et al., 2009).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the CCR is strongly associated with moderate-to-severe steatosis and significant liver fibrosis, indicating its usefulness as a marker for muscle-adjusted visceral fat mass. Considering the increasing prevalence of NAFLD worldwide and the lack of effective therapy, the CCR might be a promising and easy-to-measure serum marker in the screening and monitoring of the progression of NAFLD in public health settings. Large prospective studies are necessary to confirm whether CCR predicts NAFLD progression and to explore the role of the CCR in metabolically obese but normal-weight populations and the elderly.

References

• 1

  AlferinkL. J. M.TrajanoskaK.ErlerN. S.SchoufourJ. D.de KnegtR. J.IkramM. A.et al (2019). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the Rotterdam study: about muscle mass, Sarcopenia, fat mass, and fat distribution.J. Bone Miner. Res.341254–1263. 10.1002/jbmr.3713

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  American Diabetes Association (2018). 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018.Diabetes Care41S13–S27. 10.2337/dc18-S002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  ArnerE.WestermarkP. O.SpaldingK. L.BrittonT.RydénM.FrisénJ.et al (2010). Adipocyte turnover: relevance to human adipose tissue morphology.Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev.59105–109. 10.2337/db09-0942

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  BarretoE. F.PoyantJ. O.CovilleH. H.DierkhisingR. A.KennedyC. C.GajicO.et al (2019). Validation of the sarcopenia index to assess muscle mass in the critically ill: a novel application of kidney function markers.Clin. Nutr.381362–1367. 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.05.031

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  BazickJ.DonithanM.Neuschwander-TetriB. A.KleinerD.BruntE. M.WilsonL.et al (2015). Clinical Model for NASH and advanced fibrosis in adult patients with diabetes and NAFLD: guidelines for referral in NAFLD.Diabetes Care381347–1355. 10.2337/dc14-1239

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  DasarathyS.DasarathyJ.KhiyamiA.JosephR.LopezR.McCulloughA. J. (2009). Validity of real time ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis: a prospective study.J. Hepatol.511061–1067. 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.09.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  FanJ. G.KimS. U.WongV. W. (2017). New trends on obesity and NAFLD in Asia.J. Hepatol.67862–873. 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.06.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  FarrellG. C.ChitturiS.LauG. K.SollanoJ. D. (2007). Guidelines for the assessment and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the Asia-Pacific region: executive summary.J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.22775–777. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05002.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  GemminkA.SchrauwenP.HesselinkM. K. C. (2020). Exercising your fat (metabolism) into shape: a muscle-centred view.Diabetologia631453–1463. 10.1007/s00125-020-05170-z

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  Gomez-PerezS. L.HausJ. M.SheeanP.PatelB.MarW.ChaudhryV.et al (2016). Measuring abdominal circumference and skeletal muscle from a single cross-sectional computed tomography image: a step-by-step guide for clinicians using national institutes of health ImageJ.JPEN J. Parenter. Enteral. Nutr.40308–318. 10.1177/0148607115604149

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  KalinkovichA>A.LivshitsG. (2017). Sarcopenic obesity or obese sarcopenia: a cross talk between age-associated adipose tissue and skeletal muscle inflammation as a main mechanism of the pathogenesis.Ageing Res. Rev.35200–221. 10.1016/j.arr.2016.09.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  KashaniK. B.FrazeeE. N.KukrálováL.SarvottamK.HerasevichV.YoungP. M.et al (2017). Evaluating muscle mass by using markers of kidney function: development of the Sarcopenia index.Crit. Care Med.45e23–e29. 10.1097/ccm.0000000000002013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  KimD.ChungG. E.KwakM. S.SeoH. B.KangJ. H.KimW.et al (2016). Body fat distribution and risk of incident and regressed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.14132–138.e4. 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.07.024

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  KimG.LeeS. E.LeeY. B.JunJ. E.AhnJ.BaeJ. C.et al (2018). Relationship between relative skeletal muscle mass and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 7-year longitudinal study.Hepatology681755–1768. 10.1002/hep.30049

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  KoehlerE. M.PlompenE. P.SchoutenJ. N.HansenB. E.Darwish MuradS.TaimrP.et al (2016). Presence of diabetes mellitus and steatosis is associated with liver stiffness in a general population: the Rotterdam study.Hepatology63138–147. 10.1002/hep.27981

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  KooB. K.KimD.JooS. K.KimJ. H.ChangM. S.KimB. G.et al (2017). Sarcopenia is an independent risk factor for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and significant fibrosis.J. Hepatol.66123–131. 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.08.019

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  KöttgenA.SelvinE.StevensL. A.LeveyA. S.Van LenteF.CoreshJ. (2008). Serum cystatin C in the United States: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III).Am. J. Kidney Dis.51385–394. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.11.019

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  MamaneS.MullieL.PiazzaN.MartucciG.MoraisJ.ViganoA.et al (2016). Psoas muscle area and all-cause mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the montreal-munich study.Can. J. Cardiol.32177–182. 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.12.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  MatthewsD. R.HoskerJ. P.RudenskiA. S.NaylorB. A.TreacherD. F.TurnerR. C. (1985). Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man.Diabetologia28412–419. 10.1007/bf00280883

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  MizunoN.SekoY.KataokaS.OkudaK.FurutaM.TakemuraM.et al (20ar>2019). Increase in the skeletal muscle mass to body fat mass ratio predicts the decline in transaminase in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.J. Gastroenterol.54160–170. 10.1007/s00535-018-1485-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  NeelandI. J.AyersC. R.RohatgiA. K.TurerA. T.BerryJ. D.DasS. R.et al (2013). Associations of visceral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue with markers of cardiac and metabolic risk in obese adults.Obesity21E439–E447. 10.1002/oby.20135

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  PedersenB. K.FebbraioM. A. (2012). Muscles, exercise and obesity: skeletal muscle as a secretory organ.Nat. Rev. Endocrinol.8457–465. 10.1038/nrendo.2012.49

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  PettaS.CiminnisiS.Di MarcoV.CabibiD.CammàC.LicataA.et al (2017). Sarcopenia is associated with severe liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther.45510–518. 10.1111/apt.13889

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  RoulotD.Roudot-ThoravalF.NKontchouG.KouacouN.CostesJ. L.ElourimiG.et al (2017). Concomitant screening for liver fibrosis and steatosis in French type 2 diabetic patients using Fibroscan.Liver Int.371897–1906. 10.1111/liv.13481

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  SassoM.MietteV.SandrinL.BeaugrandM. (2012). The controlled attenuation parameter (CAP): a novel tool for the non-invasive evaluation of steatosis using Fibroscan.Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol.3613–20. 10.1016/j.clinre.2011.08.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  ShenW.PunyanityaM.WangZ.GallagherD.St-OngeM. P.AlbuJ.et al (2004). Total body skeletal muscle and adipose tissue volumes: estimation from a single abdominal cross-sectional image.J. Appl. Physiol.972333–2338. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00744.2004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  ShidaT.AkiyamaK.OhS.SawaiA.IsobeT.OkamotoY.et al (2018). Skeletal muscle mass to visceral fat area ratio is an important determinant affecting hepatic conditions of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.J. Gastroenterol.53535–547. 10.1007/s00535-017-1377-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  SpaldingK. L.ArnerE.WestermarkP. O.BernardS.BuchholzB. A.BergmannO.et al (2008). Dynamics of fat cell turnover in humans.Nature453783–787. 10.1038/nature06902

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  StinkensR.GoossensG. H.JockenJ. W.BlaakE. E. (2015). Targeting fatty acid metabolism to improve glucose metabolism.Obes. Rev.16715–757. 10.1111/obr.12298

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  TabaraY.KoharaK.OkadaY.OhyagiY.IgaseM. (2020). Creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio as a marker of skeletal muscle mass in older adults: J-SHIPP study.Clin. Nutr.391857–1862. 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.07.027

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  TetsukaS.MoritaM.IkeguchiK.NakanoI. (2013). Creatinine/cystatin C ratio as a surrogate marker of residual muscle mass in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Neurol. Clin. Neurosci.132–37. 10.1002/ncn3.11

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  TsaiE.LeeT. P. (2018). Diagnosis and evaluation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, including noninvasive biomarkers and transient elastography.Clin. Liver Dis.2273–92. 10.1016/j.cld.2017.08.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  Vilar-GomezE.ChalasaniN. (2018). Non-invasive assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: clinical prediction rules and blood-based biomarkers.J. Hepatol.68305–315. 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.11.013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  XuY.DingY.LiX.WuX. (2015). Cystatin C is a disease-associated protein subject to multiple regulation.Immunol. Cell Biol.93442–451. 10.1038/icb.2014.121

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  YounossiZ. M.KoenigA. B.AbdelatifD.FazelY.HenryL.WymerM. (2016). Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes.Hepatology6473–84. 10.1002/hep.28431

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  YounossiZ. M.StepanovaM.NegroF.HallajiS.YounossiY.LamB.et al (2012). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in lean individuals in the United States.Medicine91319–327. 10.1097/MD.0b013e3182779d49

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  ZhouB. F. (2002). Effect of body mass index on all-cause mortality and incidence of cardiovascular diseases–report for meta-analysis of prospective studies open optimal cut-off points of body mass index in Chinese adults.Biomed. Environ. Sci.15245–252.

  • Google Scholar