Abstract
Loss of L-gulonolactone oxidase (GULO), which catalyzes the last step of the ascorbic acid (AA) biosynthesis pathway, results in a complete lack of AA in several Osteichthyes fish species, including zebrafish. In this study, sGULO, the active GULO gene from cloudy catshark (Scyliorhinus torazame) was cloned into zebrafish using the Gateway cloning method. The resulting Tg(b-actin:sGULO:mCherry) fish were analyzed for the effects of a reestablished AA pathway. Fluorescent microscopy and PCR were used to analyze the integration of the construct into the zebrafish genome. Catalytic activity of sGULO, AA production, growth-related characteristics, and gene expression were investigated to evaluate the effects of AA production in Tg fish. The mCherry fluorescent protein indicated the proper integration and expression of the sGULO construct in zebrafish. The sGULO gene was ubiquitously expressed in all the studied tissues and the enzyme activity indicated an increased AA production in Tg fish. The growth of Tg fish was also increased, and antioxidant system analysis suggests that reactive oxygen species production was reduced in Tg fish compared with wild type. Expression of the AA transporter slc23a1 was significantly downregulated in Tg homozygous fish. These results collectively indicate the effects of reestablished AA synthesis in zebrafish.
Introduction
L-gulonolactone oxidase (GULO) is the last enzyme in the ascorbic acid (AA or vitamin C) pathway. Almost all plants and a majority of animals have an active GULO enzyme that catalyzes AA synthesis from glucose (). Prokaryotes lack this ability (), and thus, obtaining AA through symbiotic relationships from prokaryotes is not an option for the animals who are unable to produce AA. Therefore, animals who do not have an active GULO enzyme must obtain AA from their diet.
The role of AA in animals is more complicated than initially thought (). The basic function of AA is to act as an antioxidant (), which is consistent with the finding that most plants and algae produce AA to scavenge the reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced as a byproduct of photosynthesis (). In mammals, at least 15 enzymes belonging to the class of oxygenases and amino acid oxidases were found to use AA as an electron donor (). Additionally, AA has a regulatory role during development () and reported immune defense functions in animals ().
It was believed that all fish species are unable to synthesize AA; however, a later discovery shows that several cartilaginous and non-teleost bony fish species (Coelacanths) are capably synthesizing AA (). The AA synthesized by cartilaginous fish confirms that a common ancestor of all fish species could produce AA. Interestingly, this capability was later lost in the non-cartilaginous teleost fish, including zebrafish. Furthermore, the reappearance of AA synthesis in coelacanths and amphibians suggests the expansion of AA synthesis into terrestrial vertebrates ().
The AA synthesis in fish resembles that of terrestrial animals, with D-glucose-1-phosphate as the first precursor of the pathway. An intermediate compound, L-gulonate, can be transformed into L-gulono-1,4-lactone by gluconolactonase. L-gulono-1,4-lactone is then converted into L-AA by a single enzyme, GULO. L-gulonate participates in the pentose synthesis pathway. Therefore, the pathway up until the production of the L-gulonate is conserved in virtually all animal species (). Availability of gluconolactonase has been observed in several teleosts, including zebrafish (). However, in animals that cannot produce AA, GULO is non-functional or missing ().
This study aimed to reestablish the lost AA pathway in zebrafish as a model fish and examine the impact of its reactivation. The active GULO gene from the cloudy catshark (Scyliorhinus torazame) (sGULO) was integrated into the zebrafish system by homologous recombination. In vivo production of AA and catalytic activity of the sGULO enzyme were confirmed in zebrafish. Physiological and growth-related effects of Tg fish were compared with wild-type (Wt) fish along with their gene expression patterns.
Materials and Methods
Zebrafish Husbandry
Adult zebrafish were maintained according to standard protocols previously established (). Briefly, the fish were grown in a 14:10 h light/dark cycle and a constant water temperature of 28°C ± 0.5°C (pH 6.8–7.5). For the growth assay, fish were fed a meal with or without AA three times (Table 1). During the growth and gene expression assays, the water condition was kept constant in all fish tanks. The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Jeju National University Animal Ethics Committee.
TABLE 1
| AA + (500 mg Kg–1) diet | AA- diet | ||
| Component | Amount (g)/100 g | Amount (g) for 500 g | Amount (g) for 500 g |
| Wheat gluten1 | 15 | 75 | 75 |
| Casein1 | 30.5 | 152.5 | 152.5 |
| Egg whites | 4 | 20 | 20 |
| Cellulose1 | 3 | 15 | 15 |
| Vitamin mix (without AA)1 | 4 | 20 | 20 |
| Mineral mix1 | 4 | 20 | 20 |
| Starch2 | 26.5 | 132.5 | 132.5 |
| Corn oil1 | 7 | 35 | 35 |
| Soy lecithin1 | 5 | 25 | 25 |
| Stay C (AA source)2 | 50 mg | 250 mg | 0 |
| alpha tocopherol (Vit E)2 | 0.05 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Composition of the diet used for this study.
1https://dyets.com/. 2Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States.
Bioinformatics Characterization and Isolation of Cloudy Catshark sGULO
The nucleotide sequences for sGULO and gluconolactonase orthologous were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (). The open reading frames (ORFs), putative amino acid sequences, and multiple sequence alignments of sGULO and gluconolactonase were analyzed using Clustal Omega (). A homology model for gluconolactonase was constructed with SWISS-MODEL (), and the PyMOL v2.2.3 software was used to visualize its 3-D structure.
Cloudy catsharks (Scyliorhinus torazame) were obtained from the local fish market in Hamdeok (Jeju, South Korea). Fish was dissected to extract the kidneys, which were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. The total RNA was extracted from the tissues using Trizol Reagent® (Invitrogen, California, United States). The purity and the concentration were determined using Multiskan GO microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). The extracted RNA was used to synthesize cDNA using the PrimeScriptTM first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Assembling the Expression Construct
We used the Tol2kit to prepare the b-actin:sGULO:mCherry construct (). The primer design and vector selection were made using the Multisite Gateway® three-fragment vector construction kit (). Primers for Gateway cloning were designed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen, California, United States). Additionally, the “Kozak” consensus sequence was added to the forward primers. For analysis of differential gene expression, including that of cat, sod1, sod2, cyb5a, procollagen, slc23a1, and slc23a2, separate qPCR primers were designed (Supplementary Table 1).
The Tol2kit gateway-based technique was used for all cloning. To prepare the expression construct, pDONR221, p5E-b-actin, p3E-mCherrypA, and pDestTol2pA vectors (Invitrogen, United States) were used in this study.
sGULO was amplified using sGULOattB-F/R primers that included the specific attB-cloning sequences for the Gateway vectors (Supplementary Table 1). The PCR products were confirmed by gel electrophoresis and purified using an Accuprep® gel purification kit (BIONEER, Korea). The entry clone was constructed in a multisite Gateway cloning BP recombination reaction according to the manufacturer’s instruction with some modifications (Invitrogen, United States). The constructed entry clone was transformed into One Shot® Top10 chemically competent E. coli cells (Promega, Madison, WI, United States). Entry clone plasmids were extracted using an AccuPrep® plasmid mini extraction kit (BIONEER, Korea). Sequences of the entry vector were confirmed before preparing the expression construct.
Expression clones were constructed combining the b-actin promoter, sGULO ORF, and mCherry reporter gene, respectively. The Gateway LR recombination reaction was employed to prepare Tg(b-actin:sGULO:mCherry). This construct was then transformed into competent E. coli using a heat-shock transformation protocol provided by the manufacturer. The plasmid was extracted from positive clones using the QIAGEN® plasmid purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
The pCS2FA-transposase plasmid was linearized by NotI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, United States) and purified with the Accuprep® PCR purification kit (BIONEER, Korea). Linearized DNA (2 μg) was used for the in vitro transcription with the mMESSAGE mMACHINETM SP6 transcription kit (Invitrogen, California, United States). Transcribed RNA was purified using the ethanol precipitation method. RNA concentration was quantified using a Multiskan-GO microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) and stored at −80°C until needed.
Construction of Transgenic Zebrafish
A pneumatic pico pump PV830 (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL, United States) was used for the microinjection protocol. The microinjector was calibrated using the standard oil drop method (i.e., measuring the oil drop diameter). The microinjection mixture was prepared by mixing the expression clone, purified transposase mRNA, 0.1 M KCl, and 0.05% phenol red in nuclease-free water (final mixture volume = 10 μL). Prepared one-cell embryos were microinjected with 75 pg expression clone and 25 pg transposase mRNA. The injected embryos were placed in E3 medium and incubated at 28°C.
Establishment of Transgenic Zebrafish
After 72 h postfertilization (hpf), the microinjected embryos were selected under a fluorescent microscope (DM600B, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). The embryos that expressed red fluorescence were selected and raised at 28°C. To select the germline transmission in transgenic F0 zebrafish, we crossed injected fish with Wt fish and collected the embryos. After 72 hpf, embryos were checked for red fluorescence. The injected zebrafish that produced the positive embryos were selected as the germline transmitting F0 population.
Fins of Tg F1 fish were clipped and individually mixed with 50 μL lysis buffer (10 mM Tris pH 8.0, 0.5 M KCl, 150 μL Tween-20, and 150 μL TritonX-100 in 50 mL DEPC water) supplemented with 1 μL proteinase-K. The mixture was incubated at 60°C for 1 h. Proteinase-K was deactivated by incubating the samples at 95°C for 10 min. The extracted genomic DNA was used as a template for PCR with sGULOattB-F/R primers.
The transgenic F1 embryos obtained from F0 fish were selected under a fluorescent microscope (DM600B, Leica, Germany), nurtured, and raised to adulthood. After individuals were genotyped using PCR, F1 fish were crossed to obtain the F2 generation. The F2 generation was evaluated for fluorescence intensity and sorted into different F2 transgenic lines for Tg(b-actin:sGULO:mCherry), which were maintained as breeding populations.
GULO Assay and AA Quantification
The sGULO enzyme activity and the endogenous AA were assessed with a standard GULO activity assessment () with some modifications. Briefly, a standard curve for the ascorbate concentration was plotted using an AA standard dilution series. Then, three zebrafish Tg and Wt groups were separately weighed (five fish in each group). Whole fish were homogenized in 5 mL 0.05 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH = 7.4, 0.2% deoxycholate), and the homogenates were centrifuged for 30 min at 4°C at 20,000 × g in an Avanti® J-E high-speed centrifuge (Beckman Colter Inc., Brea, CA, United States). Then, 4 mL supernatant was added to 5.6 mM L-gulonolactone (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States) and incubated at 25°C for 30 min in normal atmospheric conditions (1 atm). The reaction was stopped by adding 2 mL of stopping solution, which contained 18% metaphosphoric acid and 16% trichloroacetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, United States). Then, 0.1 g acid-washed charcoal (Sigma-Aldrich, United States) was added to the mixture and filtered (570 mm filter paper, Whatman). Four milliliters of the filtrate were added to 1 mL of 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, United States). The test tube was covered with aluminum foil and incubated at 47°C for 90 min before the samples were cooled by swirling them in an ice bath with drop-wise addition of 5 mL 85% H2SO4 (Sigma-Aldrich, United States). The mixture was incubated for 20 min at room temperature, and the absorbance was measured at 524 nm using the Wt sample as the blank. The activity was calculated using the AA standard curve.
Feed Preparation
Feed for the growth assay was prepared by mixing the components listed in Table 1. Ingredients were mixed and pelleted using an industrial pelletizer (SP-50, Gum Gang Engineering, Daegu, Korea). Prepared feed was stored at −20°C and manually ground into fine particles with mortar and pestle before feeding.
Growth Assay
Observable physiological differences were analyzed in Tg and Wt larvae at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hpf under a stereo light microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Tg(b-actin:sGULO:mCherry) F1 female and male fish were crossed, and the F2 embryos were collected. For the growth assay, 3 days postfertilization (dpf), embryos were sorted into Wt, heterozygous (He), and homozygous (Ho) groups using fluorescent intensity in the head and trunk-tail regions. From 8 dpf, both Tg and Wt fish were fed a diet free of AA (AA−) or with AA (AA+). Fish were anesthetized after 20 days, and the body length was measured using a stereomicroscope (ZEISS, Germany). To check the growth of the fish after 1 month, fish were collected at 30 dpf and fed the AA + or AA− diet for up to 60 dpf. Fish were photographed (ZEISS, Germany) and body length measured using an image analyzing software (Digimizer Version 5.4.4).
Gene Expression Analysis
Gene expression of sGULO, superoxide dismutase-1 and -2 (sod-1,2), catalase (cat), cytochrome 5b (cyb5), procollagen, and solute carrier family 23 member-1 and 2 (slc23a1, slc23a2) were assessed in 3 dpf F2 fish using qPCR. The qPCR analysis was carried out using a thermal cycler (model Dice TP850, TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan) (Supplementary Table 1). The transcription levels were analyzed using the Livak method () and the zebrafish elongation factor 1a (ef1a) was used as an internal reference (Gene bank ID: AM422110). The transcriptional data were presented as fold expression relative to ef1a.
Statistical Analysis
All experiments were performed in triplicate. For the AA acid quantification assay, a t-test was used to determine the statistical significance at p < 0.05. For the growth analysis and gene expression experiments, an ANOVA was used with Tukey’s comparison (p < 0.05). Body length differences (ΔL) were calculated by subtracting the final length from the initial length.
Results
Bioinformatics Analysis
Gluconolactonase (NCBI accession number, NM_205746) is responsible for the production of L-gulono-1,4-lactone (PubChem CID, 439373), which is the immediate substrate for the GULO enzyme. Therefore, the expression of an active gluconolactonase enzyme in Wt fish is vital for the reestablishment of the AA synthesis in zebrafish. According to the results of this study, Wt zebrafish tissues expressed this enzyme with the highest expression detected in the zebrafish liver, and the other organs tested, except gills, showed more ubiquitous expression patterns (Figure 1A).
FIGURE 1
Then, the catalytic activity of rat senescence marker protein-30 (SMP30) (CAA48786.1), which is a known protein with gluconolactonase catalytic activity, was compared with zebrafish gluconolactonase (). Indeed, a pairwise sequence alignment of the zebrafish gluconolactonase with rat SMP30 showed 62.2% identity and 78.6% similarity (Figure 1B). These bioinformatics results further suggest the expression of active gluconolactonase and production of L-gulono-1,4-lactone in zebrafish. Additionally, we constructed separate homology models for both rat (Figure 1C-I) and zebrafish (Figure 1C-II) gluconolactonase enzymes and compared the protein structure; the results indicate a close structural similarity between the two proteins.
Tg(b-actin:sGULO:mCherry) F0, F1, and F2 Generations
We assembled the Tg(b-actin:sGULO:mCherry) construct (Figure 2A) for generating Tg zebrafish. After the genomic integration, expression of this construct in zebrafish was screened by detecting red fluorescence under a fluorescent microscope (Figures 2B,C). When the fish were 2 months old, they were verified using PCR (Supplementary Figure 1A). Germline transmission of the b-actin:sGULO:mCherry construct in the F1 and F2 lines was also analyzed using florescent detection (Supplementary Figure 1B). The F1 generation was reconfirmed with PCR using sGULOattB-F/R primer pair. Ho and He fish in the F2 generation were genotyped using relative fluorescence intensity in their head and muscle regions (Figure 3A). Then, the expression level of sGULO was confirmed using qPCR (Figure 3B) to verify fluorescent selection.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
sGULO Enzyme Activity and Endogenous AA Production
Endogenous sGULO enzyme activity indicated the successful activity of the sGULO enzyme in the zebrafish system. Although GULO activity was absent in Wt fish, Tg fish had sGULO activity of more than 534.5 μMg–1h–1in vivo (Figure 4A). In vitro synthesis of AA after the introduction of GULO previously indicated that the mouse GULO could catalyze the formation of AA (). Therefore, these results suggest the activity of sGULO enzyme in a Tg fish system. A more significant endogenous AA level was observed in Tg fish (305 nmol g–1) than in Wt (200.8 nmol g–1) (Figure 4B). This AA production in vivo confirmed the successful reestablishment of the AA pathway in zebrafish. The difference in the amount of the AA produced in Tg and Wt fish may provide us a value for the AA solely made by the sGULO, which is 104.2 nmol g–1 (305–200.8 nmol g–1).
FIGURE 4
Physiological Difference
Developmental characteristics between the F2 Tg and Wt fish were compared to evaluate the effects of the reintroduced AA synthesis on fish physiology. We found that Tg were able to produce AA independent of feeding. Furthermore, endogenous and continuous synthesis of AA may not be identical to the AA provided in the feed meal.
A comparison of the morphology of adult fish shows that the trunk area above the pectoral fin in both male and female Tg fish appeared to be muscular compared to Wt fish. As this is an indication of higher muscle mass, we measured the weight of Tg and Wt fish separately. Tg fish showed significantly higher weight compared to Wt fish (Supplementary Figure 2).
Body shape and external appendages were also compared using a light microscope (Supplementary Figure 3). Results revealed no significant visual abnormalities except the size of Tg fish. Activity during feeding and general swimming patterns were also quite similar between Tg and Wt fish. Overall, there was a lack of observable behavioral differences between Tg and Wt fish, indicating that the expression of sGULO transgene and AA synthesis did not cause any physiological abnormalities in Tg fish.
Growth analysis was performed to investigate the growth-related effects of reestablished AA synthesis on zebrafish development. During this experiment, growth was analyzed at two stages. Early growth was analyzed during the first 20 days of feeding (8–28 dpf), and latter growth was analyzed during 30 days of feeding (30–60 dpf).
The results of 28 dpf (Figure 5A) showed the effect of AA on development. Significantly lower growth of AA-fed Wt fish (Wt-) compared to AA + fed Wt fish (Wt +) indicates the importance of AA in growth-related activities in zebrafish. Furthermore, Ho fish showed higher body length. In between He + and He- as well as Ho + and Ho-, body length was statistically similar. This may indicate the production of an adequate level of AA in Tg fish. According to the length at 60 dpf (Figure 5B), He- fish showed the highest growth; interestingly the growth of Ho + fish was equal to Wt + fish. To clearly understand the rate of growth, we calculated the growth difference graph (Figure 5C). Even though the highest growth rate was expected in the Ho + fish, these results indicate that Ho- fish had the highest growth rate.
FIGURE 5
The enhanced growth of Tg fish when compared with Wt fish may have arisen due to the constant and ubiquitous availability of the reduced form of AA in Tg fish. As AA is being generated in the body of Tg fish, it is readily available for development-related biochemical activities. During early stages of development, this constant availability of AA may be an important factor for developmental processors; however, the length of Tg fish in the latter stages was not significantly different from that of Wt fish fed with the AA + diet.
Gene Expression Analysis
The expression of genes in F2 Tg fish was evaluated (Figure 6); superoxide dismutase-1 (sod1), superoxide dismutase-2 (sod2), catalase (cat), and cytochrome b5 type-α (cyb5a) expressions were analyzed in Tg and Wt zebrafish.
FIGURE 6
According to our results, cat, cyb5a, sod1, and sod2 were significantly reduced in Tg fish. Notably, the reduction was more prominent in Ho fish compared with He fish. In these Tg fish, AA production was expected to reduce ROS. The sGULO gene expression analysis showed that the Ho fish had the highest expression of sGULO, indicating higher production of AA than the He line. This type of AA production in Tg Ho fish could have resulted in the observed reduction of the oxidative system-related genes analyzed. Interestingly, we also observed a significant reduction in procollagen gene expression in the presence of high sGULO expression.
We analyzed and compared several AA transporters in Tg zebrafish to Wt fish to understand the effect of AA to express receptors for AA absorption. According to this experiment, we observed significant downregulation of slc23a1 in Ho fish although the expression of slc23a2 was significantly upregulated. This result is crucial to understand the regulation of AA concentration in Tg fish.
Discussion
One studied example for the gluconolactonase activity is rat SMP30, which catalyzes the conversion of L-gulonic acid (PubChem CID 6857417) to L-gulono-1,4-lactone (). Previous studies report the presence of catalytically active regucalcin in zebrafish tissues (), which is vital for this pathway reconstruction. As the name suggests, regucalcin is involved in calcium homeostasis. Knockout models for this enzyme developed scurvy within a short time period. Later, it was found that regucalcin acts as a gluconolactonase (; ).
In this study, we demonstrated the capability of AA pathway reconstruction by introducing an active GULO enzyme. Thereby, the AA pathway is shown to be conserved until the production of L-gulono-1,4-lactone in zebrafish. This pathway conservation up to the last enzyme is important because the latter intermediates of the AA pathway are shown to participate in other metabolic activities ().
The feasibility of AA pathway reestablishment by introducing the last enzyme has been demonstrated earlier in Gulo-/- mouse. This reconstruction is not limited to the vitamin-C pathway; thus, other pathways can be manipulated accordingly. In humans, this type of pathway reconstruction may be important in therapeutic medicine (). As mentioned previously, a common ancestor of Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes fish had an active GULO enzyme, and it later disappeared in most of the Osteichthyes. Importantly, we attempted to obtain an active GULO enzyme from another fish (S. torazame), which may resemble the previously lost GULO enzyme in zebrafish.
The first active GULO enzyme in fish was discovered nearly 20 years ago in S. torazame using bioinformatics techniques () and also showed the catalytic activity of the sGULO enzyme in vivo. The authors analyzed the GULO enzyme and reported the highest activity in the kidneys. No active gulo enzyme has been detected in zebrafish to date (). As zebrafish is unable to synthesize AA, the requirement for AA must be fulfilled by diet. The dietary supplement of AA in fish meal generally ranges from 25 to ∼2,000 mg Kg–1 and is known to improve the quality of fish (; ; ). In a previous study, zebrafish were fed an experimental diet containing 350 mg Kg–1 AA, and approximately 100 nmol g–1 AA was present in the zebrafish system (). We observed that our Tg fish model generated a similar amount of AA in the body.
The AA requirement may be different between fish species. It may also depend on the development stage and physio-pathological conditions of the fish (; ). Regarding AA utilization, studies show that AA is essential for biosynthesis activities, such as collagen synthesis (; ). Additionally, AA could directly provide electrons to metabolic reactions (), and therefore, AA is an important cofactor for multiple enzymatic reactions. Generally, metabolic reactions generate free radicals and oxidative species as byproducts. In particular, lipid metabolism increased production of oxidative species (). As an antioxidant, AA may facilitate metabolism without oxidative damage from oxidative radicals. Increased AA concentration promotes good health in fish by enhancing immune reactions against pathogens (). Reduced risk of infections generally improves growth. Therefore, we believe that these factors cumulatively enhance the growth patterns observed in Tg fish when compared with Wt fish.
AA can function independently or in conjugation with vitamin E (). Indeed, AA shows a separate role as an antioxidant due to its high water solubility compared with vitamin E (). High concentrations of AA reportedly function at the same rate as certain important antioxidant enzymes, such as sod (). Interestingly, this enhanced antioxidant capacity may retard some physiological processes, such as muscle synthesis (). A previous study shows that increased AA concentration enhanced weight gain in yellow catfish [Pelteobagrus fulvidraco (Richardson)] but only up to a level. With a higher AA concentration of more than 156 mg Kg–1, no significant increment in weight was observed in yellow catfish (). Accordingly, we believe that the 30–60 dpf length of Ho fish is not prominent due to the similar growth retardation effect.
According to the growth results at 60 dpf, external supplementation of AA is enough to facilitate similar growth in Wt fish compared with Ho- fish. As omnivorous fish in their natural environments, zebrafish may be able to obtain sufficient AA from their diet (). Therefore, zebrafish may be able to dispense gulo enzyme activity and achieve optimum growth with dietary AA (). In contrast, catshark, being a carnivorous fish, has difficulty in obtaining an adequate amount of AA from its diet (). Therefore, it must retain an active GULO enzyme. During evolution, the lack of Gulo enzyme might have been compensated by increasing the expression of AA transporters. Two slc23a genes are translated into two sodium-ascorbate co-transporters (SVCT); slc23a1 translated into svct1 and slc23a2 translated into svct2. Svct1 is important for AA absorption through the gut and transportation of AA throughout the body. Svct2 is not involved in AA absorption in the gut, and it is mainly involved in AA uptake into the metabolically active tissues. Thus, svct2 reduces oxidative damage in the metabolically active organs (; ). Observed downregulation of the slc23a1 in Ho zebrafish may further clarify the lack of statistical significance in between the Tg fish fed with AA + and AA- diet. Increased AA concentration in the tissues may have reduced the expression of slc23a1, which negatively influences the AA absorption and transportation throughout the body.
Regarding the antioxidant system, both sod1 and sod2 influence ROS (). The sod genes convert superoxide free radicals (O2–) into H2O2 and O2. H2O2 is later neutralized by the activity of catalase (). Further, cyb5a can act as an electron carrier for redox reactions, wherein it catalyzes the conversion of methemoglobin to hemoglobin, which aids O2 delivery to the liver and muscle tissues. A deficiency of cyb5a can lead to the physiological condition of methemoglobinemia ().
Ascorbic acid can directly interact with O2– or H2O2 (), which is consistent with the observed downregulation of sod1 and sod2 in Tg fish. Cat expression was significantly reduced in Tg fish compared with Wt fish. As observed for sod1 and sod2 expression, Tg fish showed signs of reduced ROS. The observed reduction in cat expression could be the result of two factors: the reduction in the precursors of H2O2 generation, such as O2– or the direct removal of H2O2 by AA. Significant downregulation of cyb5a indicated a potential reduction in redox reactions in Tg fish compared to Wt fish. In plants, electron transport utilizes AA and its functions in photosynthesis reactions are well characterized (). This is also true for animals in which AA can carry electrons between different metabolic reactions (). Therefore, electron carriers could be weakly expressed in the presence of AA and could explain the reduced expression of the electron carrier cyb5a in Tg fish compared with Wt fish.
Collagen is a structural material for various connective tissues; previous studies indicate the involvement of AA in collagen synthesis (). Two enzymes in the collagen biosynthesis pathway, lysyl hydroxylase and prolyl hydroxylase, require AA as an essential cofactor for their enzymatic activities (). These studies also indicate that AA is not involved in the procollagen gene expression. Thus, we believe that the sharp reduction of procollagen transcripts of Ho could be attributed to either transcriptional regulation of collagen biosynthesis, or reduced ROS in Tg fish may have negatively affected the procollagen mRNA transcription. However, further studies are required to validate this observation.
Conclusion
In summary, we develop a transgenic zebrafish by integrating the L-gulonolactone oxidase gene from the cloudy catshark into the zebrafish genome, thereby reactivating the evolutionarily lost AA synthesis pathway. The integrated sGULO, under the β-actin promoter, was ubiquitously expressed in transgenic zebrafish, and the expression was confirmed using the mCherry fusion protein as the fluorescent reporter. The catalytic activity of sGULO in Tg zebrafish was confirmed by analyzing the AA production. Tg fish below 1 month of age showed significantly increased length compared with Wt fish. However, Ho Tg fish, which were more than 1 month old, did not show a significant increase in length compared with AA-fed Wt fish. Expression analysis of genes related to the antioxidant system indicate a significant reduction in ROS in Tg fish compared with Wt fish. The expression of slc23a was significantly reduced in Tg fish, indicating that Tg fish may be less efficient in AA absorption. These results collectively indicate the involvement of AA in the development and antioxidant system and provide a comparison of growth of internally synthesized AA with externally provided AA.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by Animal Experiment Ethics Committee of Jeju National University.
Author contributions
KS, SJ, and NJ: data curation, methodology, software, visualization, writing—original draft preparation, conceptualization, and reviewing. JJ: software. KM: writing—original draft preparation, reviewing, and editing. M-JK and JL: investigation, monitoring, reviewing, resources, and supervision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2019R1A6A1A03033553).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.685595/full#supplementary-material
References
1
Alfonso-PrietoM.BiarnésX.VidossichP.RoviraC. (2009). The molecular mechanism of the catalase reaction.J. Am. Chem. Soc.13111751–11761. 10.1021/ja9018572
2
AltschulS. F.GishW.MillerW.MyersE. W.LipmanD. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool.J. Mol. Biol.215403–410. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
3
AvdeshA.ChenM.Martin-IversonM. T.MondalA.OngD.Rainey-SmithS.et al (2012). Regular care and maintenance of a zebrafish (Danio rerio) laboratory: an introduction.J. Vis. Exp.69:4196. 10.3791/4196
4
AyazK. M.JennessR.BirneyE. C. (1976). An improved assay for l-gulonolactone oxidase.Anal. Biochem.72161–171. 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90518-2
5
CarrA.MagginiS. (2017). Vitamin C and immune function.Nutrients9:1211. 10.3390/nu9111211
6
CathcartR. F. (1991). A unique function for ascorbate.Med. Hypotheses3532–37. 10.1016/0306-9877(91)90080-I
7
ChingB.ChewS. F.IpY. K. (2015). Ascorbate synthesis in fishes: a review.IUBMB Life6769–76. 10.1002/iub.1360
8
ChoY. S.DouglasS. E.GallantJ. W.KimK. Y.KimD. S.NamY. K. (2007). Isolation and characterization of cDNA sequences of l-gulono-gamma-lactone oxidase, a key enzyme for biosynthesis of ascorbic acid, from extant primitive fish groups.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol.147178–190. 10.1016/j.cbpb.2007.01.001
9
CortW. M. (1982). “Antioxidant properties of ascorbic acid in foods,” in Ascorbic Acid: Chemistry, Metabolism, and Uses, edsSeibP. A.TolbertB. M. (Washington, D. C: American Chemical Society), 533–550. 10.1021/ba-1982-0200.ch022
10
CrawfordT. C. (1982). “Synthesis of L-ascorbic acid,” in Ascorbic Acid: Chemistry, Metabolism, and Uses, edsPaulB. M. T.SeibA. (Washington, D. C: American Chemical Society), 1–36. 10.1021/ba-1982-0200.ch001
11
DawoodM. A. O.KoshioS. (2018). Vitamin C supplementation to optimize growth, health and stress resistance in aquatic animals.Rev. Aquac.10334–350. 10.1111/raq.12163
12
DrouinG.GodinJ.-R.PageB. (2011). The genetics of vitamin C loss in vertebrates.Curr. Genomics12371–378. 10.2174/138920211796429736
13
DuellE. J.Lujan-BarrosoL.LlivinaC.MuñozX.JenabM.Boutron-RuaultM.-C.et al (2013). Vitamin C transporter gene (SLC23A1 and SLC23A2) polymorphisms, plasma vitamin C levels, and gastric cancer risk in the EPIC cohort.Genes Nutr.8549–560. 10.1007/s12263-013-0346-6
14
Figueroa-MéndezR.Rivas-ArancibiaS. (2015). Vitamin C in health and disease: its role in the metabolism of cells and redox state in the brain.Front. Physiol.6:397. 10.3389/fphys.2015.00397
15
FracalossiD. M.AllenM. E.YuyamaL. K.OftedalO. T. (2001). Ascorbic acid biosynthesis in Amazonian fishes.Aquaculture192321–332. 10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00455-5
16
FujisawaK.TeraiS.HiroseY.TakamiT.YamamotoN.SakaidaI. (2011). Senescence marker protein 30 (SMP30)/regucalcin (RGN) expression decreases with aging, acute liver injuries and tumors in zebrafish.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.414331–336. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.09.067
17
GallieD. R. (2013). L-Ascorbic acid: a multifunctional molecule supporting plant growth and development.Scientifica (Cairo).20131–24. 10.1155/2013/795964
18
GeW. (2018). “Zebrafish,” in Encyclopedia of Reproduction, ed.SkinnerM. (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 704–710. 10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.20618-3
19
German Nutrition Society (DGE) (2015). New reference values for vitamin C intake.Ann. Nutr. Metab.6713–20. 10.1159/000434757
20
KhanK. U.ZuberiA.NazirS.UllahI.JamilZ.SarwarH. (2017). Synergistic effects of dietary nano selenium and vitamin C on growth, feeding, and physiological parameters of mahseer fish (Tor putitora).Aquac. Rep.570–75. 10.1016/j.aqrep.2017.01.002
21
KirkwoodJ. S.LeboldK. M.MirandaC. L.WrightC. L.MillerG. W.TanguayR. L.et al (2012). Vitamin C deficiency activates the purine nucleotide cycle in zebrafish.J. Biol. Chem.2873833–3841. 10.1074/jbc.M111.316018
22
KondoY.InaiY.SatoY.HandaS.KuboS.ShimokadoK.et al (2006). Senescence marker protein 30 functions as gluconolactonase in L-ascorbic acid biosynthesis, and its knockout mice are prone to scurvy.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.1035723–5728. 10.1073/pnas.0511225103
23
KurutasE. B. (2015). The importance of antioxidants which play the role in cellular response against oxidative/nitrosative stress: current state.Nutr. J.15:71. 10.1186/s12937-016-0186-5
24
KwanK. M.FujimotoE.GrabherC.MangumB. D.HardyM. E.CampbellD. S.et al (2007). The Tol2kit : a multisite gateway-based construction kit for Tol2 transposon transgenesis constructs.Dev. Dyn.2363088–3099. 10.1002/dvdy.21343
25
Le LayS.SimardG.MartinezM. C.AndriantsitohainaR. (2014). Oxidative stress and metabolic pathologies: from an adipocentric point of view.Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.20141–18. 10.1155/2014/908539
26
Le MoalE.PialouxV.JubanG.GroussardC.ZouhalH.ChazaudB.et al (2017). Redox control of skeletal muscle regeneration.Antioxid. Redox Signal.27276–310. 10.1089/ars.2016.6782
27
LiX.FengX.LuoK.MaS.DengJ.ZhangW.et al (2020). Effects of vitamin C deficiency or excess on growth performance, anti-oxidative response and fatty acid composition of juvenile abalone Haliotis discus hannai Ino.J. Oceanol. Limnol.381936–1944. 10.1007/s00343-019-9183-9
28
LiY.ShiC. X.RosenfeldJ.MossmanK. L.BooY. C.SchellhornH. E. (2008). Restoration of vitamin C synthesis in transgenic Gulo-/- mice by helper-dependent adenoviral-based expression of gulonolactone oxidase.Hum. Gene Ther.191349–1358. 10.1089/hgt.2008.106
29
LiangX.-P.LiY.HouY.-M.QiuH.ZhouQ.-C. (2017). Effect of dietary vitamin C on the growth performance, antioxidant ability and innate immunity of juvenile yellow catfish (Pelteobagrus fulvidraco Richardson).Aquac. Res.48149–160. 10.1111/are.12869
30
LiuH.-P.WenB.ChenZ.-Z.GaoJ.-Z.LiuY.ZhangY.-C.et al (2019). Effects of dietary vitamin C and vitamin E on the growth, antioxidant defence and digestive enzyme activities of juvenile discus fish (Symphysodon haraldi).Aquac. Nutr.25176–183. 10.1111/anu.12841
31
LivakK. J.SchmittgenT. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT Method.Methods25402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
32
MuradS.GroveD.LindbergK. A.ReynoldsG.SivarajahA.PinnellS. R. (1981). Regulation of collagen synthesis by ascorbic acid.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U.S.A.782879–2882. 10.1073/pnas.78.5.2879
33
NojimaY.ItoK.OnoH.NakazatoT.BonoH.YokoyamaT.et al (2015). Superoxide dismutases, SOD1 and SOD2, Play a distinct role in the fat body during pupation in silkworm Bombyx mori.PLoS One10:e0116007. 10.1371/journal.pone.0116007
34
PadayattyS.LevineM. (2016). Vitamin C: the known and the unknown and goldilocks.Oral Dis.22463–493. 10.1111/odi.12446
35
PehlivanF. E. (2017). “Vitamin C: an antioxidant agent,” in Vitamin C, ed.HamzaA. (London: InTech-open), 10.5772/intechopen.69660
36
PinnellS. R. (1985). Regulation of collagen biosynthesis by ascorbic acid: a review.Yale J. Biol. Med.58553–559.
37
QiaoH.BellJ.JuliaoS.LiL.MayJ. M. (2009). Ascorbic acid uptake and regulation of type I collagen synthesis in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells.J. Vasc. Res.4615–24. 10.1159/000135661
38
SasakiY.SoneT.YoshidaS.YahataK.HottaJ. (2004). Evidence for high specificity and efficiency of multiple recombination signals in mixed DNA cloning by the Multisite Gateway system.J. Biotechnol.107233–243. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.10.001
39
SaviniI.RossiA.PierroC.AviglianoL.CataniM. V. (2008). SVCT1 and SVCT2: key proteins for vitamin C uptake.Amino Acids34347–355. 10.1007/s00726-007-0555-7
40
SiendonesE.BallesterosM.NavasP. (2018). Cellular and molecular mechanisms of recessive hereditary methaemoglobinaemia type II.J. Clin. Med.7:341. 10.3390/jcm7100341
41
SieversF.WilmA.DineenD.GibsonT. J.KarplusK.LiW.et al (2011). Fast, scalable generation of high−quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega.Mol. Syst. Biol.7:539. 10.1038/msb.2011.75
42
SmirnoffN. (2001). L-Ascorbic acid biosynthesis.Vitam. Horm.61241–266. 10.1016/S0083-6729(01)61008-2
43
SmirnoffN. (2018). Ascorbic acid metabolism and functions: a comparison of plants and mammals.Free Radic. Biol. Med.122116–129. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.03.033
44
WangL.ChenD.LouB.ZhanW.ChenR.LiuF.et al (2017). The effects of dietary vitamin C on growth performance, serum enzymes activities and resistance to Vibrio alginolyticus challenge of yellow drum Nibea albiflora.Aquac. Res.484684–4695. 10.1111/are.13290
45
WaterhouseA.BertoniM.BienertS.StuderG.TaurielloG.GumiennyR.et al (2018). SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes.Nucleic Acids Res.46W296–W303. 10.1093/nar/gky427
46
YamaguchiM. (2013). The anti-apoptotic effect of regucalcin is mediated through multisignaling pathways.Apoptosis181145–1153. 10.1007/s10495-013-0859-x
47
Yildirim-AksoyM.LimC.LiM. H.KlesiusP. H. (2008). Interaction between dietary levels of vitamins C and E on growth and immune responses in channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque).Aquac. Res.391198–1209. 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.01984.x
Summary
Keywords
transgenic zebrafish, ascorbic acid, gene expression pattern, antioxidant genes, morphology
Citation
Shanaka KASN, Jung S, Janson ND, Jayasingha JRP, Madushani KP, Kim M-J and Lee J (2021) Growth and Antioxidant-Related Effects of the Reestablished Ascorbic Acid Pathway in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) by Genomic Integration of L-Gulonolactone Oxidase From Cloudy Catshark (Scyliorhinus torazame). Front. Physiol. 12:685595. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.685595
Received
25 March 2021
Accepted
28 May 2021
Published
05 July 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Maria Giulia Lionetto, University of Salento, Italy
Reviewed by
Tiziano Verri, University of Salento, Italy; Mario Alberto Burgos-Aceves, University of Salerno, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Shanaka, Jung, Janson, Jayasingha, Madushani, Kim and Lee.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Myoung-Jin Kim, mj.kim.lucky@gmail.comJehee Lee, jehee@jejunu.ac.kr
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
This article was submitted to Aquatic Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.