Abstract
Voltage dependent anion-selective channel (VDAC) is the most abundant protein in the mitochondrial outer membrane. It is a membrane embedded β-barrel protein composed of 19 mostly anti-parallel β-strands that form a hydrophilic pore. Similar to the vast majority of mitochondrial proteins, VDAC is encoded by nuclear DNA, and synthesized on cytosolic ribosomes. The protein is then targeted to the mitochondria while being maintained in an import competent conformation by specific cytosolic factors. Recent studies, using yeast cells as a model system, have unearthed the long searched for mitochondrial targeting signal for VDAC and the role of cytosolic chaperones and mitochondrial import machineries in its proper biogenesis. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge regarding the early cytosolic stages of the biogenesis of VDAC molecules, the specific targeting of VDAC to the mitochondrial surface, and the subsequent integration of VDAC into the mitochondrial outer membrane by the TOM and TOB/SAM complexes.
Introduction
Most of the outer membrane (OM) proteins in Gram-negative bacteria are membrane-embedded β-barrel proteins that are composed of anti-parallel β-strands forming a barrel shaped hydrophilic pore in the membrane. In eukaryotes, the presence of β-barrel proteins is restricted to the OM of mitochondria and chloroplasts that were derived from prokaryotic ancestors. The assembly of these proteins into their corresponding OM is in each case facilitated by a dedicated protein complex that contains a highly conserved central β-barrel protein termed BamA/YaeT/Omp85 in Gram-negative bacteria, Tob55/Sam50 in mitochondria, and probably OEP80 in plastids (Ulrich and Rapaport, 2015; ). These central components are related to each other and belong to the Omp85 superfamily (). Voltage Dependent Anion-selective Channels (VDACs) are abundant mitochondrial β-barrel proteins (; ). Their pore is composed of 19 anti-parallel β-strands whereas strands 1 and 19 are in parallel orientation to each other. VDAC, which was previously known as mitochondrial porin, functions as a channel for transport of metabolites, nucleotides, ions, and even small peptides (). VDACs are found in mitochondria across the spectrum of life, from unicellular yeasts to plants and all higher eukaryotes. Bakers’ yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) has two genes encoding VDACs, POR1 and POR2, while higher eukaryotes like humans have at least three isoforms, VDAC1, VDAC2 and VDAC3 and plants have up to five such genes (Young et al., 2007; ).
During the evolution of mitochondria from an ancient endosymbiont, most of the organellar genes, including those encoding predecessors of VDACs, were transferred to the nucleus, with the mitochondrial genome retaining the codes for only few key components of the respiratory chain complexes (). VDACs are thus transcribed in the nucleus and translated on cytosolic ribosomes. Then, they need to be targeted to the correct sub-cellular organelle, namely the mitochondria, and ultimately integrated into the mitochondrial OM (MOM) with the help of dedicated import machineries. In this review, we will highlight recent studies that have discovered cytosolic factors associated with newly synthesized VDAC molecules, the elusive mitochondrial targeting information for VDAC, and finally the mechanisms of insertion and integration of VDAC into MOM.
Early Cytosolic Events of Newly Synthesized VDAC Molecules
The first challenge of the biogenesis of VDAC is to keep the newly synthesized molecules in an import competent conformation (; ). The rather hydrophobic β-strands that build the transmembrane segments are prone to aggregation in the cytosol. Thus, the newly synthesized VDAC precursors must be bound by cytosolic chaperones to shield these hydrophobic patches, preventing the emerging nascent chain from engaging in unfavorable intra- and inter-molecular interactions (). This association with chaperones maintains them in an import-competent conformation. Recent studies, using yeast as a model system, demonstrate that newly synthesized VDAC molecules dynamically interact with Hsp70 chaperones (Ssa1/2) and their Hsp40 co-chaperones Ydj1 and Sis1 (Figure 1; ). Inhibiting the activity of the cytosolic Hsp70 chaperone, preventing its docking to the mitochondrial receptor Tom70, or co-depleting both co-chaperones Ydj1 and Sis1 resulted in a significant reduction in in vivo and in vitro import of VDAC into yeast mitochondria. Experiments utilizing Hsp70 inhibitors and pull-down assays demonstrated that the interactions between VDAC and Hsp70 chaperones and their physiological role are also conserved in mammalian cells. Moreover, a β-hairpin motif of VDAC, hypothesized to be the mitochondrial targeting signal (see below), was sufficient for the interaction with these (co-) chaperones. It should be emphasized that these (co-) chaperones support the import of not only β-barrel proteins but are also involved in the biogenesis of many additional proteins. Hence, so far, a targeting factor, which is dedicated solely to β-barrel proteins was not identified. The abovementioned chaperones, based on the mitochondrial targeting information, relay the nascent precursors to the receptors of the translocase of the outer membrane (TOM) of mitochondria. Other β-barrel proteins like Tom40 and Tob55/Sam50 appear to follow the same route as VDAC ().
FIGURE 1
Currently, it is not clear whether the aforementioned cytosolic factors support biogenesis solely by preventing premature unfavorable aggregation or whether they also facilitate specific targeting. The contribution of the chaperone anchor Tom70, located at the mitochondrial surface, to the overall import process suggests that association with chaperones also increases the specificity of organellar targeting.
Targeting of VDAC to the Mitochondrial Surface
Most mitochondrial precursor proteins contain a cleavable N-terminal presequence that targets them to mitochondria. However, like the other mitochondrial β-barrel proteins, VDAC lacks a cleavable targeting signal. Hence, it remained unclear how the targeting information for VDAC was encoded. Various studies showed that bacterial and chloroplast β-barrel proteins could be targeted and assembled into yeast mitochondria (Walther et al., 2009; Ulrich et al., 2012, 2014). Conversely, VDAC could also be integrated into bacterial outer membranes and form pores there (Walther et al., 2010), suggesting that the targeting information for β-barrel proteins is conserved from bacteria to mitochondria and thus functional in both systems. Since none of the studies could identify a definitive linear amino acid sequence as the targeting signal, it was hypothesized that the targeting signal may be a structural feature of the β-barrel proteins.
Truncation studies showed that the last C-terminal β-strand of mitochondrial β-barrel proteins contains a stretch of amino acids that facilitate their interaction with the TOB/SAM complex. These residues were called the β-signal (). However, deletion or mutation of the β-signal did not interfere with the initial targeting of newly synthesized β-barrel proteins to mitochondria. Studies involving a bacterial trimeric autotransporter Yersinia adhesion A (YadA), where each subunit contributes four β-strands to a 12-mer β-barrel structure, demonstrated that such proteins can be targeted to mitochondria upon their expression in yeast cells (). This finding implies that even a partial β-barrel structure (like four β-strands) is sufficient for specific mitochondrial targeting. Hence, it was further tested whether a β-hairpin structural motif, which is composed of two β-strands and a loop and represents the most basic repeating structural motif of β-barrel proteins, could be the elusive mitochondrial targeting signal. To support this possibility, it was shown that a peptide corresponding to the last β-hairpin of human VDAC1 could competitively inhibit the in vitro import of mitochondrial β-barrels (). Moreover, hybrid proteins of this β-hairpin fused to soluble passenger domains like GFP or DHFR were targeted to mitochondria upon their expression in yeast cells. Such β-hairpin motif has an amphipathic characteristic as eventually, upon its incorporation into a membrane-embedded β-barrel, one phase of the motif will face the lipid core and hence is hydrophobic, whereas the opposite one will be exposed to the pore lumen and thus is rather hydrophilic. Importantly, it was discovered that optimal mitochondrial targeting depends on relative elevated hydrophobicity of those amino acid residues that face the lipid core of the membrane ().
In most eukaryotic cells, mitochondria are the only organelles containing β-barrel proteins. The problem of specific targeting gets an interesting twist in plant cells where plastids can be an alternative destination for such proteins. addressed this issue and found that the hydrophobicity is not sufficient for the discrimination of targeting to chloroplasts or mitochondria. By domain swapping between mitochondrial (atVDAC1) and chloroplast (psOEP24) targeted β-barrel proteins, they could demonstrate that the presence of a hydrophilic amino acid at the C-terminus of the penultimate β-strand is also required for mitochondrial targeting. A variant of the chloroplast β-barrel protein psOEP24, which mimics such profile, was efficiently targeted to mitochondria ().
Collectively, it seems that the combined contribution of several β-hairpin motifs with a highly hydrophobic face assures proper mitochondrial targeting of VDAC.
Membrane Integration of VDAC by the TOM and TOB/SAM Complexes
Once the chaperone-associated VDAC precursors are targeted to mitochondria via the β-hairpin signal, they interact with the TOM complex at the mitochondrial surface to initiate organellar import (Figure 1). The TOM complex is comprised of the core complex and its peripheral import receptors. The core complex has a central translocon channel, formed by the integral β-barrel protein Tom40, along with several transmembrane accessory proteins namely Tom5, Tom6, Tom7, and Tom22 (; ; Tucker and Park, 2019). Tom20 and Tom70 are the receptors involved in the initial recognition of multiple mitochondrial proteins (; Figure 1). Several studies hinted at the role of Tom20 in the recognition of β-barrel precursors (; ; ; Yamano et al., 2008). Using NMR, photo-crosslinking and fluorescence complementation assays, it was recently shown that the β-hairpin element of VDAC interacts with the mitochondrial import receptor Tom20 via the presequence binding region of the latter (). Moreover, direct cross-linking of the β-hairpin motif to Tom70 and the observation that blocking this receptor interferes with the import of VDAC suggested that Tom70 also plays a role in the initial recognition of VDAC (). The involvement of Tom70 can be either via direct recognition of the substrate protein or by serving as a docking site for the chaperone-substrate complex.
Following recognition by the import receptors, the VDAC precursors are translocated across the MOM via the Tom40 channel by interacting with a series of binding sites, probably with increasing affinities (). Upon its emergence at the intermembrane space (IMS), the translocated VDAC molecule interacts with the small chaperones of the translocase of the inner membrane (small TIMs). The IMS chaperone system includes the small Tim proteins, Tim8, Tim9, Tim10, and Tim13 (). These small chaperones form alternating circular hexamers comprised of three subunits of Tim9 and Tim10, or three subunits of each Tim8 and Tim13 (Webb et al., 2006; ). Site-specific cross-linking indicated that the small TIMs interact with the IMS-exposed part of the N-terminal extension of Tom40 ().
The small TIMs play an important role in the transfer of the β-barrel precursors of VDAC from the TOM complex to the sorting and assembly machinery (SAM) complex (; Wiedemann et al., 2004; Figure 1). The formation of a β-hairpin within the last two C-terminal β-strands of VDAC is crucial for the interaction of the precursors with the TIM chaperones. Structural and mechanistic studies revealed that TIM chaperones hold the VDAC protein precursors in a nascent chain-like extended conformation via multiple clamp-like binding sites (Weinhäupl et al., 2018). Such multiple weak and constantly reshuffling interactions ultimately allow for the efficient release of the precursor to the actual insertase, the SAM complex, which is also known as the topogenesis of outer-membrane β-barrel proteins (TOB) complex (Figure 1; ; Wiedemann et al., 2003; ). The Tim9/10 binding cleft for the β-barrel precursors has conserved hydrophobic residues for these interactions, and mutations in these residues are detrimental to the VDAC biogenesis and overall cell growth.
To facilitate a smooth transfer, the TOM and the TOB/SAM complex can form a super-complex bridged by the cytosolic domain of Tom22 and the peripheral TOB/SAM component, Mas37/Sam37 (). The core subunit of the TOB/SAM complex is the 16-stranded β-barrel protein Tob55/Sam50, that belongs to the Omp85 superfamily of proteins. Tob55/Sam50 has an N-terminal POTRA domain, which can bind the incoming substrate but is not essential for the β-barrel assembly process. In addition, the TOB/SAM complex harbors two cytosol-exposed peripheral subunits that are involved in formation of a TOM-TOB super-complex (Mas37/Sam37) and stabilization of the TOB/SAM bound form of the precursor (Tob38/Sam35).
Our understanding of the final steps in the biogenesis of the VDAC β-barrel precursors evolved dramatically in the last 5 years. Structural studies indicate the formation of a lateral gate between β-strands 1 and 16 of Sam50. Accordingly, and supported by intensive cross-linking assays, the lateral gate insertion model was put forward. This model suggests that the C-terminal β-signal of the precursor initiates opening of the gate by exchange with the endogenous Sam50 β-signal. In addition, loop 6 of Sam50 was found to be crucial for the VDAC precursor transfer to the lateral gate (). An increasing number of β hairpin–like loops of the precursor insert and fold sequentially and accumulate at the lateral gate (Figure 2A). Finally, hydrogen bonds are formed between the first and last β-strand to close the newly folded VDAC β-barrel. Upon folding at Sam50, the full-length newly formed β-barrel protein is laterally released into the outer membrane and the Sam50 lateral gate closes (Figure 2A). The opening of the putative lateral gate obtained further support from a recent report on the atomic structure of the SAM complex (). Membrane thinning in the vicinity of the lateral gate can further facilitate insertion of the β-barrel protein into the lipid bilayer.
FIGURE 2
The membrane integration model recently obtained a new twist from structural studies. Based on detailed atomic structure of the SAM complex, the barrel swapping model envisions the SAM complex as formed by a SAM monomer (Sam50a along with Sam35 and Sam37) and a Sam50b second barrel (Figure 2B; Takeda et al., 2021). The precursor protein β-signal binds Sam50a as in the lateral gate insertion model. Then, the folded VDAC β-barrel slowly displaces Sam50b and takes its place. Sam37 that originally also interacts with Sam50b, gets gradually involved in interactions with the newly formed VDAC barrel (Figure 2B). Finally, this barrel dissociates from the SAM complex and is integrated into the MOM.
Of note, most of our current knowledge regarding the biogenesis of β-barrel proteins is based on biochemical and structural studies on fungal elements. While the atomic structure of the mammalian TOM complex appears to be rather similar to its fungal counterpart (Wang et al., 2020), not much is known about the SAM complex in higher eukaryotes. It is rather clear that the mammalian Sam50 is the central component of the complex. However, the precise functions of Metaxins1/2/3, which are homologous to yeast Sam35 and Sam37, is not clear yet.
Perspectives
Our understanding of the factors and machineries involved in the assembly of VDAC proteins into the MOM has made tremendous progress in the last 20 years. We now have detailed atomic structures of the membrane-embedded TOM and SAM complexes, and the hexamer of the small TIM chaperones that transfer the substrate from the former to the latter. Challenges for the future include the characterization of the mammalian SAM complex and to decipher how the various biogenesis steps of VDAC are regulated and adapted to the cellular physiological conditions. Moreover, it will be interesting to determine if after its insertion into the OM, oligomerization, additional folding, or post-translational modifications are necessary for VDAC to become fully functional.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
AM and DR wrote the manuscript. Both authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RA1028/8-2 to DR) and the IMPRS “From Molecules to Organisms” (AM).
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Kai S. Dimmer for his comments on this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AraisoY.TsutsumiA.QiuJ.ImaiK.ShiotaT.SongJ.et al (2019). Structure of the mitochondrial import gate reveals distinct preprotein paths.Nature575395–401. 10.1038/s41586-019-1680-7
2
BauseweinT.MillsD. J.LangerJ. D.NitschkeB.NussbergerS.KühlbrandtW. (2017). Cryo-EM structure of the TOM core complex from Neurospora crassa.Cell170693–700.e697.
3
BenzR. (1989). “Porins from mitochondrial and bacterial outer membranes: structural and functional aspects,” in Anion Carriers of Mitochondrial Membranes, edsAzziA.NałęzK. A.NałęczM. J.WojtczakL. (Berlin: Springer).
4
BeverlyK. N.SawayaM. R.SchmidE.KoehlerC. M. (2008). The Tim8-Tim13 complex has multiple substrate binding sites and binds cooperatively to Tim23.J. Mol. Biol.3821144–1156. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.07.069
5
ColombiniM. (1979). A candidate for the permeability pathway of the outer mitochondrial membrane.Nature279643–645. 10.1038/279643a0
6
DiederichsK. A.NiX.RollauerS. E.BotosI.TanX.KingM. S.et al (2020). Structural insight into mitochondrial β-barrel outer membrane protein biogenesis.Nat. Commun.11:3290.
7
FreitagH.NeupertW.BenzR. (1982). Purification and characterisation of a pore protein of the outer mitochondria1 membrane from Neurospora crassa.Eur. J. Biochem.123629–636. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb06578.x
8
GentleI.GabrielK.BeechP.WallerR.LithgowT. (2004). The Omp85 family of proteins is essential for outer membrane biogenesis in mitochondria and bacteria.J. Cell Biol.16419–24. 10.1083/jcb.200310092
9
GentleI. E.BurriL.LithgowT. (2005). Molecular architecture and function of the Omp85 family of proteins.Mol. Microbiol.581216–1225. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04906.x
10
GrayM. W.BurgerG.LangB. F. (1999). Mitochondrial evolution.Science2831476–1481.
11
GrossL. E.KlingerA.SpiesN.ErnstT.FlinnerN.SimmS.et al (2021). Insertion of plastidic β-barrel proteins into the outer envelopes of plastids involves an intermembrane space intermediate formed with Toc75-V/OEP80.Plant Cell331657–1681. 10.1093/plcell/koab052
12
HillK.ModelK.RyanM. T.DietmeierK.MartinF.WagnerR.et al (1998). Tom40 forms the hydrophilic channel of the mitochondrial import pore for preproteins.Nature395516–521. 10.1038/26780
13
HöhrA. I. C.LindauC.WirthC.QiuJ.StroudD. A.KutikS.et al (2018). Membrane protein insertion through a mitochondrial β-barrel gate.Science359:eaah6834. 10.1126/science.aah6834
14
HoppinsS. C.NargangF. E. (2004). The Tim8-Tim13 complex of Neurospora crassa functions in the assembly of proteins into both mitochondrial membranes.J. Biol. Chem.27912396–12405. 10.1074/jbc.m313037200
15
JoresT.KlingerA.GroßL. E.KawanoS.FlinnerN.Duchardt-FernerE.et al (2016). Characterization of the targeting signal in mitochondrial β-barrel proteins.Nat. Commun.7:12036.
16
JoresT.LawatscheckJ.BekeV.Franz-WachtelM.YunokiK.FitzgeraldJ. C.et al (2018). Cytosolic Hsp70 and Hsp40 chaperones enable the biogenesis of mitochondrial β-barrel proteins.J. Cell Biol.217:3091. 10.1083/jcb.201712029
17
KimY. E.HippM. S.BracherA.Hayer-HartlM.HartlF. U. (2013). Molecular chaperone functions in protein folding and proteostasis.Annu. Rev. Biochem.82323–355. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060208-092442
18
KlingerA.GoschV.BodensohnU.LadigR.SchleiffE. (2019). The signal distinguishing between targeting of outer membrane β-barrel protein to plastids and mitochondria in plants.Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res.1866663–672. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2019.01.004
19
KoehlerC. M.JaroschE.TokatlidisK.SchmidK.SchweyenR. J.SchatzG. (1998). Import of mitochondrial carriers mediated by essential proteins of the intermembrane space.Science279369–373. 10.1126/science.279.5349.369
20
KrimmerT.RapaportD.RyanM. T.MeisingerC.KassenbrockC. K.Blachly-DysonE.et al (2001). Biogenesis of porin of the outer mitochondrial membrane involves an import pathway via receptors and the general import pore of the TOM complex.J. Cell Biol.152289–300. 10.1083/jcb.152.2.289
21
KutikS.StojanovskiD.BeckerL.BeckerT.MeineckeM.KrügerV.et al (2008). Dissecting membrane insertion of mitochondrial β-barrel proteins.Cell1321011–1024. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.028
22
MüllerJ. E.PapicD.UlrichT.GrinI.SchützM.OberhettingerP.et al (2011). Mitochondria can recognize and assemble fragments of a beta-barrel structure.Mol. Biol. Cell221638–1647. 10.1091/mbc.e10-12-0943
23
NeupertW.HerrmannJ. M. (2007). Translocation of proteins into mitochondria.Annu. Rev. Biochem.76723–749. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.052705.163409
24
PaschenS. A.WaizeneggerT.StanT.PreussM.CyrklaffM.HellK.et al (2003). Evolutionary conservation of biogenesis of β-barrel membrane proteins.Nature426862–866. 10.1038/nature02208
25
QiuJ.WenzL. S.ZerbesR. M.OeljeklausS.BohnertM.StroudD. A.et al (2013). Coupling of mitochondrial import and export translocases by receptor-mediated supercomplex formation.Cell154596–608. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.033
26
RaghavanA.SheikoT.GrahamB. H.CraigenW. J. (2012). Voltage-dependant anion channels: novel insights into isoform function through genetic models.Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr.18181477–1485. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.10.019
27
RapaportD.NeupertW. (1999). Biogenesis of Tom40, core component of the TOM complex of mitochondria.J. Cell Biol.146321–331. 10.1083/jcb.146.2.321
28
ScheinS. J.ColombiniM.FinkelsteinA. (1976). Reconstitution in planar lipid bilayers of a voltage-dependent anion-selective channel obtained from paramecium mitochondria.J. Membr. Biol.3099–120. 10.1007/bf01869662
29
SchleiffE.SilviusJ. R.ShoreG. C. (1999). Direct membrane insertion of voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein catalyzed by mitochondrial Tom20.J. Cell Biol.145973–978. 10.1083/jcb.145.5.973
30
ShiotaT.ImaiK.QiuJ.HewittV. L.TanK.ShenH. H.et al (2015). Molecular architecture of the active mitochondrial protein gate.Science3491544–1548. 10.1126/science.aac6428
31
TakedaH.TsutsumiA.NishizawaT.LindauC.BustoJ. V.WenzL.-S.et al (2021). Mitochondrial sorting and assembly machinery operates by β-barrel switching.Nature590163–169. 10.1038/s41586-020-03113-7
32
TuckerK.ParkE. (2019). Cryo-EM structure of the mitochondrial protein-import channel TOM complex at near-atomic resolution.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.261158–1166. 10.1038/s41594-019-0339-2
33
UlrichT.GrossL. E.SommerM. S.SchleiffE.RapaportD. (2012). Chloroplast β-barrel proteins are assembled into the mitochondrial outer membrane in a process that depends on the TOM and TOB complexes.J. Biol. Chem.28727467–27479. 10.1074/jbc.m112.382093
34
UlrichT.OberhettingerP.SchützM.HolzerK.RammsA. S.LinkeD.Iet al (2014). Evolutionary conservation in biogenesis of β-barrel proteins allows mitochondria to assemble a functional bacterial trimeric autotransporter protein.J. Biol. Chem.28929457–29470. 10.1074/jbc.m114.565655
35
UlrichT.RapaportD. (2015). Biogenesis of beta-barrel proteins in evolutionary context.Int. J. Med. Microbiol.305259–264. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.12.009
36
WaltherD. M.BosM. P.RapaportD.TommassenJ. (2010). The mitochondrial porin, VDAC, has retained the ability to be assembled in the bacterial outer membrane.Mol. Biol. Evol.27887–895. 10.1093/molbev/msp294
37
WaltherD. M.PapicD.BosM. P.TommassenJ.RapaportD. (2009). Signals in bacterial beta-barrel proteins are functional in eukaryotic cells for targeting to and assembly in mitochondria.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1062531–2536. 10.1073/pnas.0807830106
38
WangW.ChenX.ZhangL.YiJ.MaQ.YinJ.et al (2020). Atomic structure of human TOM core complex.Cell Discov.6:67.
39
WebbC. T.GormanM. A.LazarouM.RyanM. T.GulbisJ. M. (2006). Crystal structure of the mitochondrial chaperone TIM9•10 reveals a Six-bladed α-propeller.Mol. Cell21123–133. 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.11.010
40
WeinhäuplK.LindauC.HesselA.WangY.SchützeC.JoresT.et al (2018). Structural basis of membrane protein chaperoning through the mitochondrial intermembrane space.Cell1751365–1379.e1325.
41
WiedemannN.KozjakV.ChacinskaA.SchönfishB.RospertS.RyanM. T.et al (2003). Machinery for protein sorting and assembly in the mitochondrial outer membrane.Nature424565–571. 10.1038/nature01753
42
WiedemannN.TruscottK. N.PfannschmidtS.GuiardB.MeisingerC.PfannerN. (2004). Biogenesis of the protein import channel Tom40 of the mitochondrial outer membrane: intermembrane space components are involved in an early stage of the assembly pathway.J. Biol. Chem.27918188–18194. 10.1074/jbc.m400050200
43
YamanoK.YatsukawaY.EsakiM.HobbsA. E.JensenR. E.EndoT. (2008). Tom20 and Tom22 share the common signal recognition pathway in mitochondrial protein import.J. Biol. Chem.2833799–3807. 10.1074/jbc.m708339200
44
YoungM. J.BayD. C.HausnerG.CourtD. A. (2007). The evolutionary history of mitochondrial porins.BMC Evol. Biol.7:31. 10.1186/1471-2148-7-31
Summary
Keywords
beta-barrels, chaperones, mitochondria, outer membrane, TOM complex, VDAC
Citation
Moitra A and Rapaport D (2021) The Biogenesis Process of VDAC – From Early Cytosolic Events to Its Final Membrane Integration. Front. Physiol. 12:732742. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.732742
Received
29 June 2021
Accepted
26 July 2021
Published
12 August 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Vito De Pinto, University of Catania, Italy
Reviewed by
Eduardo Nestor Maldonado, Medical University of South Carolina, United States; Dejana Mokranjac, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Moitra and Rapaport.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Doron Rapaport, doron.rapaport@uni-tuebingen.de
This article was submitted to Mitochondrial Research, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.