Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effects of physical exercise on neck and shoulder muscle strength and pain in military pilots.
Method: Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched studies published up to April 1, 2022. Studies that met the screening criteria were included in the final meta-analysis. We calculated neck and shoulder maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs), prevalence of pain, and pain intensity. Heterogeneity was explored by subgroup and sensitivity analyses.
Result: A total of 15 studies with 907 participants were included. In the exercise group, muscle strength was significantly increased in four directions of neck motion: flexion (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.08–0.82), extension (SMD = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.27–1.00), right lateral flexion (Rtflx) (SMD = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.12–0.94), and left lateral flexion (Ltflx) (SMD = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.09–0.91). Subgroup analysis showed that fighter pilots, strength plus endurance training, and a follow-up period <20 weeks exhibited more significant muscle strength improvements than helicopter pilots, simple strength training, and a follow-up period ≥20 weeks. Overall, the pooled odds ratio (OR) for the effect of physical exercise on the prevalence of neck pain was not statistically significant (I2 = 60%). Sensitivity analysis revealed that the heterogeneity was restored after removing each of two studies (I2 = 47%), and the pooled OR was statistically significant (OR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.94, or OR = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24–0.91). Furthermore, compared with observational studies (OS), the reduction in the prevalence of neck pain was more significant in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (OR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18–0.78). No significant differences in the effects of exercise on shoulder muscle strength and neck and shoulder pain intensity were observed.
Conclusion: Physical exercise can improve neck muscle strength in military pilots. After removing studies that may be the source of heterogeneity, exercise showed a protective effect on neck pain, especially in RCTs. The conclusion that exercise had no effects on shoulder muscle strength and pain intensity should be taken with caution.
1 Introduction
Flight-related neck and shoulder pain is a common symptoms in military pilots (). Neck disorders caused by flight have been afflicting pilots for a long time. Severe pain even leads to interruption or grounding of tasks, causing great harm to the physical and mental health of pilots (; ).
Previous studies have shown that pain is affected by a variety of factors. In-flight effects, such as acceleration, sedentary behavior, head-worn equipment, and seatback, are all risk factors for neck pain and cervical spondylosis in pilots (; Verde et al., 2015; ). In particular, sudden movements of the pilot’s head upon exposure to high Gz accelerations increase the risk of acute cervical spine injury (). Studies have shown that the neck muscles in pilots are significantly activated during flight, suggesting that the neck muscle is subjected to a high load (). When the load is applied for a long period, the muscle becomes fatigued, which increases the risk of neck muscle strains (). With the continuous improvement of aircraft performance, the load borne by pilots is also increasing. The acceleration of high-performance fighters can reach more than +9 Gz at present, which undoubtedly poses a greater challenge to pilot cervical spine health (Wallace et al., 2021).
Currently, measures to prevent flight-related neck and shoulder pain include warm-up and stretching before and after flight, head prepositioning, and exercise etc., all of which have been reported to provide protective effects (; Thoolen and van den Oord, 2015; ; Wallace et al., 2021). However, even so, the reporting rate of neck pain among pilots has remained high in recent years (; ; ). This increase rate is undoubtedly related to the improvement of aircraft performance. In addition, pain relief through special head positions in a confined cabin is not satisfactory (). The method of changing the design of seat backrest or cabin environment is not only time-consuming but also requires considerable economic investment. Under such a premise, the prevention and relief of neck and shoulder pain through one’s own exercise seems to be a relatively quick and effective method.
In many RCTs, strong evidence supports the effectiveness of physical exercise for neck pain (; ; ). The main purpose of exercise for pilots is to improve the ability to resist high Gz acceleration by improving the strength of the neck muscles and strengthening the control of the muscles (). In this study, we investigated the effects of physical exercise in military pilots on neck and shoulder muscle strength and pain base on a meta-analysis of previous studies, to provide more scientific and appropriate guidance for future training protocols.
2 Materials and methods
We followed the standards of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) (; Zhang et al., 2021) and MOOSE (Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) (Stroup et al., 2000) guidelines during our research. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42022336463).
2.1 Data sources and search strategy
The Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched by three reviewers from inception to April 1st, 2022. Search items included medical subject headings (MeSH) and their following keywords: “pilot”, “exercise”, “training”, “neck”, and “shoulder”. The search strategy is provided in detail in Supplementary Table S1. Outcome measures were not used as search terms because reviewers wanted to comprehensively query relevant measures of exercising intervention in pilots to avoid omissions of important information. No language restrictions were employed during the search. Duplicate studies were removed by means of Endnote and manual secondary examination. During the whole process of literature retrieval, screening, assessment and data extraction, disagreements between the two reviewers were resolved by discussion with a third reviewer.
2.2 Selection criteria and data extraction
The literature screening process followed the PICOS principles, i.e., “population”, “intervention”, “comparison”, “outcome”, and “study”. The inclusion and exclusion criteria of the literature are provided in detail in Supplementary Table S2.
We extracted the following data from each included study: type of aircraft, total number of participants, age, height, weight, type of study, training site, training protocol, equipment, follow-up period, and outcomes. The primary outcomes were neck maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) (), including flexion, extension, left (Ltflx) and right (Rtflx) lateral flexion and the prevalence of neck pain (). When included in our analysis, the units of the MVIC are unified and are typically reported as N or Nm. Given the paucity of studies, MVIC of shoulder elevation and pain intensity of neck and shoulder expressed by visual analog scale (VAS) () were used as secondary outcomes. The relative outcomes in the figures were analyzed with the aid of GetData Graph Digitizer 2.26.
2.3 Quality and risk-of-bias assessment
We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) to evaluate the risk of bias of the included observational studies (). Of these, the NOS form has different terms for the case-control studies (CCS) and cohort studies. NOS scores ranged from 0 to 9, with a score of greater than 6 including a high-quality study. For randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we used the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool to assess the risk of bias in six domains: sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other issues (). Cross-sectional studies used an 11-item checklist with a full scale of 11 scores as recommended by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) () as follows: low quality = 0–3; moderate quality = 4–7; high quality = 8–11.
2.4 Data synthesis and statistical analysis
We used Review Manager (Revman) software (version 5.4) for quantitative analysis of the following variables between the exercise group (EG) and the control group (CG) or between the exposure group (EG) and nonexposure group (NEG): MVIC, prevalence of pain, and VAS. As a result of the unit difference (N or Nm), we calculated pooled estimates of the standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for MVIC. Pooled outcomes of the same unit and VAS were calculated using the MD. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the prevalence of pain, which served as a categorical variable. Random-effects models were used for the analysis of all outcomes, and the I2 statistic was used to test for heterogeneity (Wei et al., 2022). Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were performed on the results with I2 > 50% to identify the source of heterogeneity. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were performed to address heterogeneity as much as possible. Subgroups were classified according to the type of study, aircraft, equipment, training protocol, and follow-up period. p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Due to the small number of included studies in each outcome, we did not perform a test for publication bias (Sterne et al., 2011).
3 Results
3.1 Literature search and study selection
Our search strategy identified a total of 1855 studies (PubMed = 505, Cochrane = 511, Embase = 839). After removing duplicates (n = 1186), 668 studies remained. After reading the titles and abstracts, 646 studies were excluded. Next, the full texts of 22 selected studies were reviewed. Seven studies were eliminated at this stage, and 15 studies were eligible for quantitative synthesis (; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ). The PRISMA flow chart for study selection is presented in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1
3.2 Quality assessment of the included studies
Supplementary Figure S1 shows a summary of the risk of bias assessment for RCTs (; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ). All studies were rated as high risk for the term “blinding of participants and personnel” due to the inability to conceal the intervention from the pilots who participated in the training program. We evaluated two case-control studies (; ) and two cohort studies (; ) using NOS. As a result, only one study was evaluated as high quality (total score = 6), two studies had a score of 5, and one study had a score of 4 (Supplementary Table S3). One cross-sectional study was evaluated using the 11-item checklist recommended by the AHRQ (), and its quality was evaluated as moderate (total score = 4).
3.3 Study characteristics
The characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis are reported in Supplementary Table S4. The study region included Denmark (n = 4) (; ; ; ); United States (n = 2) (; ); Australia (n = 2) (; ); Sweden (n = 2) (; ); Finland (n = 1) (); Belgium (n = 1) (), Canada (n = 1) (); Israel (n = 1) (), and Germany (n = 1) (). A total of 907 pilots, including 675 (74.4%) fighter crew members and 232 (25.6%) helicopter pilots, were analyzed. The training protocol included muscle strength training alone (n = 5) (; ; ; ; ), strength and endurance training (n = 5) (; ; ; ; ), and a combination of strength, endurance, and coordination training (n = 5) (; ; ; ; ). The equipment used included hands-free devices, small devices (elastic rubber bands, dumbbells, or body blades), and complex devices (multi-cervical units (MCUs). Given that two training groups were included in each of two studies (; ) using different training protocols or equipment, the studies were split into Group A and Group B for meta-analysis (Zhao et al., 2022).
3.4 Strength of neck muscles
Figure 2 shows the forest plot of the relationship between physical exercise and muscle strength. The results showed that the increase in muscle strength was more significant in the exercise group in the four directions of neck movement: flexion (SMD, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.82; I2 = 47%) (Figure 2A), extension (SMD, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.00; I2 = 44%) (Figure 2B), Rtflx (SMD, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.94; I2 = 0%) (Figure 2C), and Ltflx (SMD, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.91; I2 = 0%) (Figure 2D). The results of the unified unit of the muscle strength showed a higher change in the exercise group than the control group: 17.53 N (95% CI, 5.68 to 29.39; I2 = 35%) in flexion (Supplementary Figure S2A); 27.55 N (95% CI, 7.11 to 47.99; I2 = 35%) and 8.54 Nm (95% CI, 0.57 to 16.50; I2 = 72%) in extension (Supplementary Figure S3); 17.08 N (95% CI, 3.59 to 30.56; I2 = 0%) in Rtfix (Supplementary Figure S4); 19.25 N (95% CI, 5.54 to 32.96; I2 = 0%) in Ltflx (Supplementary Figure S5), except for the flexion in Nm (MD, 1.60; 95% CI, -0.62, 3.81; I2 = 0%) (Supplementary Figure S2B).
FIGURE 2
The subgroup analysis showed that muscle strength increases in neck flexion (SMD, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.32 to 1.80; I2 = 56%) (Supplementary Figure S6), neck extension (SMD, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.69; I2 = 0%) (Supplementary Figure S10), and Ltflx (SMD, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.41; I2 = 0%) (Supplementary Figure S17) were significantly greater than those noted in the control group, and Rtflx (SMD, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.00 to 1.24; I2 = 0%) (Supplementary Figure S14) approached a significant higher value. In contrast, the helicopter group exhibited no significant difference except for extension (SMD, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.85; I2 = 0%) (Supplementary Figure S10). In addition, except for the significant heterogeneity of the aircraft type in neck extension (p = 0.004) (Supplementary Figure S10), no significant heterogeneity in other directions was noted.
The subgroup analysis of training equipment showed that the strength increase in neck flexion (SMD, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.63; I2 = 0%) and extension (SMD, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.98; I2 = 0%) in the exercise group using a small device was significantly greater than that in the control group (Supplementary Figures S7, S11). However, the strength increase in Ltflx and Rtflx was not significantly different (Supplementary Figures S15, S18). In addition, the strength increase using the complex device was also significant in the neck flexion (SMD, 1.74; 95% CI, 0.75–2.73) (Supplementary Figure S7), extension (SMD, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.47–2.47) (Supplementary Figure S11), and Ltflx (SMD, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.16–1.92) (Supplementary Figure S18) with near significance in Rtflx (SMD, 0.83; 95% CI, -0.03–1.69) (Supplementary Figure S15). Training equipment had significant heterogeneity in neck flexion (p = 0.01) and extension (p = 0.02) (Supplementary Figures S7, S11).
The subgroup analysis of the training protocol showed that muscle strength in the strength plus endurance training group was significantly greater than simply strength training and comprehensive (strength+endurance+coordination) training in neck flexion (SMD, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.07 to 1.52; I2 = 65%) (Supplementary Figure S8), extension (SMD, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.51; I2 = 32%) (Supplementary Figure S12), Rtflx (SMD, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.06 to 1.09; I2 = 0%) (Supplementary Figure S16), and Ltflx (SMD, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.10 to 1.14; I2 = 0%) (Supplementary Figure S19). The comprehensive training protocol was significant only in extension strength (SMD, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.98; I2 = 0%) (Supplementary Figure S12), and the other protocols were not significantly different. The heterogeneity of the training protocol was not statistically significant.
The subgroup analysis of the follow-up period showed that there were statistically significant muscle strength increases in neck flexion (SMD, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.01 to 1.10; I2 = 59%) (Supplementary Figure S9) and neck extension (SMD, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.97; I2 = 39%) (Supplementary Figure S13) at a follow-up period of less than 20 weeks. Only the strength increase in extension (SMD, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.23 to 1.51; I2 = 59%) at a follow-up period of no less than 20 weeks was statistically significant (Supplementary Figure S13). The heterogeneity of the follow-up period was not statistically significant.
3.5 Prevalence of neck pain
Figure 3A presents the relationship between physical exercise and the prevalence of neck pain. The results showed that the prevalence of neck pain in the exercise group was not statistically significant compared with that in the control group (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.28 to 1.22; I2 = 60%). Sensitivity analysis showed that heterogeneity was restored (I2 = 47%) after the exclusion of two studies (; ), and the pooled OR showed a significant association between physical exercise and the prevalence of neck pain (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23–0.94) (Figure 3B) (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24–0.91) (Figure 3C). The subgroup analysis of study type showed that the reduction in the prevalence of neck pain with the RCT compared with OS was statistically significant (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.78; I2 = 0%) (Figure 4). The prevalence of neck pain was not significant based on the type of aircraft (Figure 5). In the training protocol subgroup, although comprehensive training (strength + endurance + coordination) was significant (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08–0.80) (Figure 6), the result was relatively conservative due to the small number of studies (n = 1). In addition, the prevalence of neck pain was not significant for the heterogeneity of all subgroups.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
3.6 Strength of shoulder muscles
Figure 7 shows that physical exercise did not significantly improve right shoulder (Figure 7A) or left shoulder muscle strength (Figure 7B) compared with the control group.
FIGURE 7
3.7 Pain intensity of the neck and shoulder
Figure 8 shows that physical exercise did not significantly reduce pain intensity in the neck (Figure 8A), right shoulder (Figure 8B), or left shoulder (Figure 8C) compared with the control group.
FIGURE 8
4 Discussion
4.1 Association between exercise and neck and shoulder strength in pilots
Methods to improve neck muscle strength through exercise have become a consensus in the general working population. However, due to the particularity of a pilot’s profession, daily flights and routine training occupy most of his/her day. Can additional training programs significantly improve neck and shoulder muscle strength, and does training have the same effect on muscle strength in different parts of the neck? These issues need to be clarified urgently because they will help us to further develop more scientific training programs. Currently, there is no evidence-based exercise program that can specifically improve the strength of muscles around the spine to reduce physiological and perceived stress during high Gz flight (). Fortunately, our meta-analysis yielded positive results showed that physical exercise significantly improved MVIC in the four directions of neck motion in flexion, extension, Rtflx, and Ltflx (Figure 2), indicating that exercise had a significant effect on neck muscle strengthening in pilots. In particular, the pooled estimates of the MD in unified unit showed that the muscle strength change in neck flexion increased by 17.53 N in the exercise group compared to the non-exercise group; the neck extension increased by 27.55 N, and the exercise group could do more work by 8.54 Nm with the same torque; the muscle strength in right and left flexion increased by 17.08 N and 19.25 N respectively. Although no significant result was obtained for muscle strength change in neck flexion in Nm, in general, exercise did increase the pilots’ neck muscle strength to some extent (Supplementary Figure S2-5).
However, the difference in shoulder elevation was not significant (Figure 7). Murray et al. () found that the shoulder musculature was stronger in pilots and crew than in general working staff, whereas neck strength was not correspondingly higher. Our results also seem to corroborate his study in that the benefits obtained by neck muscles through exercise may be more pronounced than those of the shoulders. It has been demonstrated that the trapezius muscle is activated during air combat maneuvers, especially when fighter pilots adopt a specific head position (). This finding also suggests that our training protocol needs to strengthen the intensity on the shoulder to obtain significant muscle strength improvement. However, because the number of studies was too small, we remain cautious about this conclusion.
4.2 Association between exercise and neck and shoulder pain in pilots
Although many studies have demonstrated that physical exercise can relieve work-related neck pain (; ; ; ; ), there is no strong evidence that physical exercise reduces the prevalence or intensity of flight-related neck and shoulder pain because the different mechanisms contrast with the occupational pain in general high Gz and special aviation environments are the root causes. It is worth affirming that there are still many OS and RCTs with positive conclusions. Albano et al. () investigated 268 American F-16 pilots and found that the probability of neck injury was reduced in the early exercise intervention (p = 0.024). Ang et al. () performed 1-year neck training in 68 helicopter pilots and found that the incidence of neck pain was reduced in the past week (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.3–7.8) and the past 3 months (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2–3.2) after follow-up. Lange et al. () also showed that targeted neck exercises for fighter pilots can reduce their neck pain intensity. However, there are also studies that report the opposite conclusions. De Loosede et al. (), Newman et al. (), and Jones et al. () showed no difference in the incidence of neck pain between the exercise and no exercise groups. In-flight acceleration loading increases the pull to the spine through the muscles and ligaments of the neck, accelerating disc degeneration and the development of neck pain (). In contrast, pilots with neck pain had significantly lower muscle strength (). More studies have shown that increasing the strength of neck muscles can yield more sustained muscle support and protect the spine from high Gz-induced injury (; Stergiou et al., 2017; ). Second, a stronger muscle reduces the transmission of force, enhances the stability of the spine, and reduces the risk of load-induced premature disc degeneration (; ).
Our pooled OR showed no significant effect of physical exercise in reducing the prevalence of neck pain (Figure 3A). However, we noted high heterogeneity in this result (I2 = 63%). Fortunately, we found possible sources of heterogeneity through sensitivity analysis. After excluding the studies by Jones et al. () and De Loose et al. (), heterogeneity was restored (I2 = 47%), and the pooled OR showed a significant association between physical exercise and the prevalence of neck pain (Figures 3B,C). The study by Jones et al. () was a cross-sectional study and was lower in level of evidence than RCTs, cohort studies, and case-control studies according to Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (). De Loose et al. () had a smaller sample size, especially in the exposure group. Only seven people participated in exercise. Although only three people in the exposure group had neck pain, which may seem like a small number, the smaller denominator resulted in a seemingly increased prevalence. In addition, the study was a case-control study with no a high-level of evidence (). Our subgroup analysis of study types revealed that RCTs had a significantly lower prevalence of neck pain, but not for the OS (Figure 4). Given that OS are retrospective, the exercises were unsupervised, and a large recall bias was noted in the respondents. Second, we noted a large difference in reporting pain rates at baseline across studies, which was attributed to the different definitions of neck pain, which also contributed to heterogeneity to some extent.
Our analysis for pain intensity showed no difference in pain scores between the exercise and control groups, either in the neck or shoulder (Figure 8). However, the findings are cautious due to the small number of studies. The investigation by Lange et al. () showed that although a significant majority (82%) of pilots experienced neck pain in the year, none experienced symptoms on a daily basis. Seventy-three percent of the pilots had a pain frequency of <31 days in a year. Bahat et al. () also expressed a consistent view that flight-related neck pain usually occurs acutely after a flight and recovers over several days. This also suggests that pilot neck pain is not chronic, but periodically occurs with exposure. This cyclical pain would result in lower mean scores because the odds of experiencing pain in such a short duration are low. Murray et al. () suggested that the “dilution” effect of participants without pain results in lower pain scores at baseline and a lower likelihood of reducing pain intensity through exercise. Some studies have used the percentage of individuals with a 50% reduction in VAS () as an outcome indicator to evaluate the effect of exercise, which seems to be an option. In addition, we believe that the reporting of pain frequency may be more representative of the characteristics of cyclical pain than intensity and prevalence.
4.3 Association between subgroups and outcome
4.3.1 Type of aircraft
Our subgroup analysis found that the muscle strength changes in fighter pilots after exercise were more significant than those of helicopter pilots (Supplementary Figures S6, S10, S14, S17). Studies on the differences in muscle strength of pilots of different aircraft types are limited. Ang et al. () measured the MVC of the neck muscle in pilots with neck pain and found that muscle strength was decreased in fighter pilots with neck pain, but not in helicopter pilots. The source of the difference may be that fighter pilots are frequently exposed to high Gz loads, resulting in decreased skeletal muscle stress. Helicopter pilots have a long driving time, and long fixed postures more often manifest as muscle fatigue. Fighter pilots may have generally lower neck strength than helicopter pilots, which may explain our results. Specially, fighter pilots may have more room to improve their neck strength due to reduced muscle strength caused by a high prevalence of neck pain. Because pilots in different types of aircraft have different types of exposure and pain, the training will also have a different focus (; ). Helicopter pilots are more suitable for endurance exercise due to frequent neck muscle fatigue.
The prevalence of neck pain varies among different types of aircraft. Grossman et al. () found that neck pain is more common in fighter pilots compared with attack helicopter and transport aircraft pilots possibly because the necks of fighter pilots are more susceptible to a combination of factors, such as helmets, acceleration, and sitting posture. De Loose et al. () stated that “check six” is a routine flight maneuver for fighter pilots and the most common cause of neck pain in investigated pilots. This action requires the combination of lateral neck flexion and extension muscles to achieve maximal rotation of the neck. Therefore, the neck muscles of fighter pilots are affected by greater flight stress than other types of pilots. In summary, the incidence of neck pain was greater in fighter pilots compared with helicopter pilots. We included seven studies in our analysis on the prevalence of neck pain, six of which focused on fighter pilots and only one study focused on helicopter pilots, which resulted in a high baseline in the prevalence of neck pain. Due to the paucity of studies on helicopter pilots, we did not observe a difference in the effect of exercise on the prevalence of neck pain in pilots of different aircraft types (Figure 5).
4.3.2 Equipment
A commonly used device for neck training is an elastic band named the Thera-band (THER) (; ) (2009, Ang)(; ), which is also referred to as a headband () or rubber tube in some literature (). In general, one end of the elastic band is fixed to a helmet or a harness over the head, and the other end is fixed or attached to a weight. The trainer then performs muscle contractions in different directions of neck movement. This equipment is also suitable for shoulder training () or is replaced with other weights, such as dumbbells (). In most studies, muscle strength increased and pain improved in pilots who applied elastic bands (; ; ; ), but some studies also yielded negative results (2017, Murray). Our subgroup analysis is consistent with most studies, where the muscle strength increase in neck flexion and extension with small devices (including THER, rubber tube, headband, band) was significant (Supplementary Figures S7, S11) with the exception of lateral flexion (Supplementary Figures S15, S18). In addition, a larger neck training device called the multi-cervical unit (MCU) has also been used in pilot neck training (; ). Burnett et al. () compared the effectiveness of muscle strength training in pilots using MCU or THER. The researchers found that MCU was superior to elastic bands. Although our analysis included this study as a separate subgroup, we cannot conclude that MCU was more effective than elastic bands for neck muscle training due to the lack of additional literature support. Netto et al. () performed neck exercises in pilots using elastic bands and resistance machines to simulate different intensities of muscle activation during air combat maneuver. They concluded that neck training using the elastic band might be most practical for pilots who were exposed to low gravity flight and maintained a neutral neck position, such as transport, bomber, or helicopter pilots. In addition, elastic band training is more suitable for rehabilitation after + Gz injury. On the other hand, resistance machines were recommended for overload intensity training of fighter pilots to obtain maximal muscle strength (TAN, 1999; ; ).
Some studies applied virtual reality (VR) systems for training assistance and instruction (), but did not report differences in terms of muscle strength improvement and pain relief. Given that we do not know what devices their subjects used during training, it is not possible to categorize it into any of the subgroups. The frequent deployments and relocations of pilots prevent them from regularly accessing the gym for training and make it difficult to obtain training equipment suitable for counterweight (). Therefore, we need to seek forms of strength exercise that do not require special equipment, and the training equipment is portable (). More studies suggested the use of an elastic band for training (; ) given its convenience compared to large equipment. One study reported a wearable cervical resistance exercise device that has been shown to be effective in improving strength and endurance in the cervical muscle. Targeted at implementing portable countermeasures, this device may represent a good alternative to elastic bands ().
4.3.3 Training protocol
In general occupational groups, work-related neck pain is reduced by various physical exercises (), proprioceptive muscle coordination training (Waling et al., 2000; ), and strength training (; ). Currently, there is no recognized form of exercise that can prevent neck pain in pilots. The most common form of training that target the neck and shoulder muscle include strength, endurance, and coordination training (; ; ). It has been reported that muscle strength training for more than 1 hour per week may represent a protective factor for neck pain in helicopter pilots (). Many investigators have used electromyographic measures based on flight exposure to assess neck and shoulder fatigue and found prolonged muscle activation, indicating that muscle fatigue may be a risk factor for the development of neck and shoulder pain (; ; ). In the general population, the strength and endurance of cervical muscles are decreased in patients with neck pain (; ). investigated the effects of a training program on pilots and found that dynamic endurance trainers had less sick leave and +Gz limitation due to neck complaints than resistance training. This finding suggests that pilots with neck and shoulder pain may also benefit from endurance training rather than just strength training. Generally, in muscle fibers, type I fibers are activated superior to type II fibers to provide sustained low-intensity muscle pull (Visser and van Dieën, 2006). Increasing the number of type I fibers can increase the ability of muscles to aerobically breathe, maintaining muscle contraction against fatigue for extended periods of time (). A longer duration of pain is associated with significantly reduced number of type I fibers and higher proportion type II fibers (). Endurance training programs that provide low loads have the potential to slow or reverse this change.
In addition to endurance training, an increasing number of studies emphasize the importance of pilot coordination training (; ; ; ). Superficial musculature is used for segmental control during neck movements, which requires deep stability to support the anterior convex curve of the cervical spine (). When the deep muscles are weakened, the superficial muscles overcompensate, leading to dysfunction of the neck muscles (). proposed the use of low-load exercise to re-establish coordination between the deep and superficial layers of the neck muscles. performed neck coordination and endurance training on pilots and showed that the participants in both groups exhibited significant increases in maximum neck strength and endurance compared to the control group, and the effect of the coordination training group showed a greater increase than the endurance training group. In another study, pilots used trampoline training to improve neck muscle function, and the results showed that it was as effective as strength training in increasing maximal muscle strength and reducing neck strain in flight. Trampoline training may increase neuromuscular performance and intermuscular coordination, which may improve the mechanical efficiency of maintaining cervical spine stability and thus have beneficial effects in reducing flight muscle strain (). Our subgroup analysis showed that strength training alone did not improve the neck muscle strength of pilots (Supplementary Figures S8, S12, S16, S19) or reduce the prevalence of neck pain (Figure 6), In contrast, strength with endurance training significantly improved neck muscle strength (Supplementary Figures S8, S12, S16, S19) but also did not show a significant reduction in the prevalence of neck pain. In contrast, a combination of strength, endurance and coordination training appeared to achieve significant neck pain relief. However, due to the small pooled number, we need to include more studies to verify this finding.
4.3.4 Follow-up period
In the subgroup analysis of follow-up time, muscle strength was improved in the follow-up less than 20 weeks, while the follow-up group with no less than 20 weeks had a significant improvement in the extension but not in the flexion muscle. (Supplementary Figures S9, S13). However, we generally believe that the exercise period can accumulate higher changes in outcomes. However, the length of the training period greatly affects compliance. Ang et al. () reported 77% compliance at a follow-up time of 6 weeks, which was acceptable. Another study conducted a 12-weeks training follow-up and reported 52.8% and 76.1% adherence in the two groups (). The study by Murray et al. (; ) included a long follow-up time (20 weeks), whereas only 28.6% of participants adhered to regular training. In the study by Lange et al. () with a follow-up of 24 weeks, only 58% of the participants regularly trained three times a week. Overall, the compliance of pilots is reduced with a longer follow-up period.
Therefore, we need to identify the optimal training period to achieve the maximum payoff. reported self-supervised 4-weeks short-period training in pilots, but the results showed no significant improvement in muscle strength. Other groups reported that 6 weeks of training increased muscle strength (Stasinaki et al., 2015) and reduced in-flight neck strain or pain under + Gz loading (). For office workers, their neck pain was reduced when they performed specific strength training for 10 weeks (). Similarly, Burnett et al. () suggested neck training 10 weeks before pilots start flying high-performance aircraft to be completely prepared for the load of high-performance. In addition, a neck strengthening program should be developed for those who return to service after a flight break to increase neck strength. Based on previous research experience, the research and development of exercise programs for future combat pilots should include exercise schedules and supervised programs to ensure compliance (). Based on this notion, we believe that a short period of adequate stimulation is more suitable than a longer exercise program for the professional needs of pilots, and this time can be roughly limited to approximately 6–12 weeks. Moreover, training must be highly specific and supervised because general whole-body reinforcement is not thought to produce similar improvements in neck strength (). In the future, an informatization management means that breaks geographical restrictions are indispensable.
4.4 Limitations
This study has some limitations. First, we included observational studies (cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies), when investigating the effects of exercise on neck pain. This design will cause an unavoidable bias due to the presence of potential confounding factors. Second, the number of studies included in each outcome was small, and the quality was uneven. The small sample size of each study leads to a wide confidence interval for the pooled effect value, which reduces the power of the results. Third, differences in the definition of outcomes and measurement criteria were noted. There were differences in the criteria for the pain and pain-free groups between studies. Fourth, differences in exercise programs were noted. To address the above limitations, we will continuously follow up the relevant research progress and try to identify more high-quality studies to expand the sample size. The mesh meta-analysis will be performed to compare the differences between types of exercise intervention.
5 Conclusion
Physical exercise can improve the neck muscle strength of military pilots and is significantly effective in flexion, extension, and left and right lateral flexion. Moreover, fighter pilots, complex devices, comprehensive training (strength plus endurance), and a follow-up period less than 20 weeks seemed to obtain more significant muscle strength improvement than helicopter pilots, small devices, simple strength training, and a follow-up period greater than 20 weeks. Overall, the pooled results did not show a significant effect of exercise on neck pain. However, sensitivity analysis revealed that the lack of a significant effect was due to heterogeneity. The sources of heterogeneity may include observational studies and studies with small samples. After removing the above studies, exercise showed a significant protective effect on neck pain. No significant differences in shoulder muscle strength or neck and shoulder pain intensity were noted between exercises. However, this conclusion should be taken with caution, and more studies need to be included to improve the persuasiveness of these findings. There are great challenges in the development of training programs for military pilots due to the differences in aircraft types and the uncertainty of working hours and locations. In the future, training protocols, equipment, periods and methods of supervision should be fully considered.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
JQ, CZ, and WH designed the study. WH, FW, and ZL performed the literature search. WH, FW, and ZL conducted the literature retrieval, screening, and assessment. XY, KZ and FY extracted data. WH, FW, ZL, XY and MD did the statistical analyses. WH, FW, and ZL drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript. CZ and JQ supervised the study. All authors read and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81871818) and Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (No.2019JM-265).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2022.973304/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AbeT.DehoyosD. V.PollockM. L.GarzarellaL. (2000). Time course for strength and muscle thickness changes following upper and lower body resistance training in men and women. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.81, 174–180. 10.1007/s004210050027
2
AlbanoJ. J.StanfordJ. B. (1998). Prevention of minor neck injuries in F-16 pilots. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.69, 1193–1199.
3
AlricssonM.Harms-RingdahlK.LarssonB.LinderJ.WernerS. (2004). Neck muscle strength and endurance in fighter pilots: Effects of a supervised training program. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.75, 23–28.
4
AngB.LinderJ.Harms-RingdahlK. (2005). Neck strength and myoelectric fatigue in fighter and helicopter pilots with a history of neck pain. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.76, 375–380.
5
AngB. O.MonnierA.Harms-RingdahlK. (2009). Neck/shoulder exercise for neck pain in air force helicopter pilots: A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)34, E544–E551. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa6870
6
BahatH. S.GermanD.PalomoG.GoldH.NirY. F. (2020). Self-kinematic training for flight-associated neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform.91, 790–797. 10.3357/AMHP.5546.2020
7
Ben AyedH.YaichS.TriguiM.Ben HmidaM.Ben JemaaM.AmmarA.et al (2019). Prevalence, risk factors and outcomes of neck, shoulders and low-back pain in secondary-school children. J. Res. Health Sci.19, e00440.
8
BlangstedA. K.SøgaardK.HansenE. A.HannerzH.SjøgaardG. (2008). One-year randomized controlled trial with different physical-activity programs to reduce musculoskeletal symptoms in the neck and shoulders among office workers. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health34, 55–65. 10.5271/sjweh.1192
9
BlomgrenJ.StrandellE.JullG.VikmanI.RöijezonU. (2018). Effects of deep cervical flexor training on impaired physiological functions associated with chronic neck pain: A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord.19, 415. 10.1186/s12891-018-2324-z
10
BurnettA. F.NaumannF. L.PriceR. S.SandersR. H. (2005). A comparison of training methods to increase neck muscle strength. Work25, 205–210.
11
ChenX.CoombesB. K.SjøgaardG.JunD.O'LearyS.JohnstonV. (2018). Workplace-based interventions for neck pain in office workers: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys. Ther.98, 40–62. 10.1093/ptj/pzx101
12
ChengH.WangZ.LiuS.YangY.ZhaoG.CongH.et al (2011). Research, design and application of model NSE-1 neck muscle training machine for pilots. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi28, 387–391.
13
ChiuT. T.SingK. L. (2002). Evaluation of cervical range of motion and isometric neck muscle strength: Reliability and validity. Clin. Rehabil.16, 851–858. 10.1191/0269215502cr550oa
14
ChumbleyE. M.StolfiA.MceachenJ. C. (2017). Risk factors for cervical pain in F-15C pilots. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform.88, 1000–1007. 10.3357/AMHP.4848.2017
15
CoakwellM. R.BloswickD. S.MoserR. (2004). High-risk head and neck movements at high G and interventions to reduce associated neck injury. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.75, 68–80.
16
ConleyM. S.StoneM. H.NimmonsM.DudleyG. A. (1997). Resistance training and human cervical muscle recruitment plasticity. J. Appl. Physiol.83, 2105–2111. 10.1152/jappl.1997.83.6.2105
17
CouryH.MoreiraR.DiasN. B. (2009). Efetividade do exercício físico em ambiente ocupacional para controle da dor cervical, lombar e do ombro: uma revisão sistemática. Rev. Bras. Fisioter.13, 461–479. 10.1590/s1413-35552009000600002
18
CouttsA.ReaburnP.PivaT. J.MurphyA. (2007). Changes in selected biochemical, muscular strength, power, and endurance measures during deliberate overreaching and tapering in rugby league players. Int. J. Sports Med.28, 116–124. 10.1055/s-2006-924145
19
De LooseV.van Den OordM.BurnotteF.van TiggelenD.StevensV.CagnieB.et al (2008). Individual, work-and flight-related issues in F-16 pilots reporting neck pain. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.79, 779–783. 10.3357/asem.2285.2008
20
Espejo-AntunezL.Fernandez-MoralesC.Moreno-VazquezJ. M.Tabla-HinojosaF. B.Cardero-DuranM. L. A.Albornoz-CabelloM. (2022). An Observational Study, 12. Diagnostics (Basel).Assessment from a biopsychosocial approach of flight-related neck pain in fighter pilots of Spanish air force
21
FallaD. (2004). Unravelling the complexity of muscle impairment in chronic neck pain. Man. Ther.9, 125–133. 10.1016/j.math.2004.05.003
22
FallaD. L.JullG. A.HodgesP. W. (2004). Patients with neck pain demonstrate reduced electromyographic activity of the deep cervical flexor muscles during performance of the craniocervical flexion test. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)29, 2108–2114. 10.1097/01.brs.0000141170.89317.0e
23
GreenN. D.BrownL. (2004). Head positioning and neck muscle activation during air combat. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.75, 676–680.
24
GrossmanA.NakdimonI.ChapnikL.LevyY. (2012). Back symptoms in aviators flying different aircraft. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.83, 702–705. 10.3357/asem.3225.2012
25
HämäläinenO.HeinijokiH.VanharantaH. (1998). Neck training and +Gz-related neck pain: A preliminary study. Mil. Med.163, 707–708. 10.1093/milmed/163.10.707
26
HämäläinenO.VanharantaH.BloiguR. (1993). Determinants of +Gz-related neck pain: A preliminary survey. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.64, 651–652.
27
HarrisonM. F.CoffeyB.AlbertW. J.FischerS. L. (2015). Night vision goggle-induced neck pain in military helicopter aircrew: A literature review. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform.86, 46–55. 10.3357/AMHP.4027.2015
28
HarrisonM. F.NearyJ. P.AlbertW. J.KurugantiU.CrollJ. C.ChanceyV. C.et al (2009). Measuring neuromuscular fatigue in cervical spinal musculature of military helicopter aircrew. Mil. Med.174, 1183–1189. 10.7205/milmed-d-00-7409
29
HigginsJ. P.ThompsonS. G.DeeksJ. J.AltmanD. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj327, 557–560. 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
30
HonkanenT.SoveliusR.MantysaariM.KyrolainenH.AvelaJ.LeinoT. K. (2018). +Gz exposure and spinal injury-induced flight duty limitations. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform.89, 552–556. 10.3357/AMHP.4999.2018
31
HowickJ, C. I.GlasziouP. (2011). Oxford Centre for evidence-based medicine - level of evidence. [Online]. Available: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o51025 (Accessed March 10, 2022).
32
HurwitzE. L.CarrageeE. J.van der VeldeG.CarrollL. J.NordinM.GuzmanJ.et al (2009). Treatment of neck pain: Noninvasive interventions: Results of the bone and joint decade 2000-2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. J. Manip. Physiol. Ther.32, S141–S175. 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.017
33
IatridisJ. C.NicollS. B.MichalekA. J.WalterB. A.GuptaM. S. (2013). Role of biomechanics in intervertebral disc degeneration and regenerative therapies: What needs repairing in the disc and what are promising biomaterials for its repair?Spine J.13, 243–262. 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.12.002
34
JonesJ. A.HartS. F.BaskinD. S.EffenhauserR.JohnsonS. L.NovasM. A.et al (2000). Human and behavioral factors contributing to spine-based neurological cockpit injuries in pilots of high-performance aircraft: Recommendations for management and prevention. Mil. Med.165, 6–12. 10.1093/milmed/165.1.6
35
KayT. M.GrossA.GoldsmithC. H.RutherfordS.VothS.HovingJ. L.et al (2012). Exercises for mechanical neck disorders. New York, United States: The Cochrane Collaboration by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., CD004250.
36
KopskyD. J.SzadekK. M.SchoberP.VranckenA.SteegersM. A. H. (2022). Study design characteristics and endpoints for enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trials for chronic pain patients: A systematic review. J. Pain Res.15, 479–496. 10.2147/JPR.S334840
37
LacioM.VieiraJ. G.TrybulskiR.CamposY.SantanaD.FilhoJ. E.et al (2021). Effects of resistance training performed with different loads in untrained and trained male adult individuals on maximal strength and muscle hypertrophy: A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health18, 11237. 10.3390/ijerph182111237
38
LangeB.MurrayM.ChreitehS. S.ToftP.JorgensenM. B.SogaardK.et al (2014). Postural control and shoulder steadiness in F-16 pilots: A randomized controlled study. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.85, 420–425. 10.3357/asem.3783.2014
39
LangeB.ToftP.MyburghC.SjøgaardG. (2013). Effect of targeted strength, endurance, and coordination exercise on neck and shoulder pain among fighter pilots: A randomized-controlled trial. Clin. J. Pain29, 50–59. 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182478678
40
LiberatiA.AltmanD. G.TetzlaffJ.MulrowC.GotzscheP. C.IoannidisJ. P.et al (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ339, b2700. 10.1136/bmj.b2700
41
MisailidouV.MalliouP.BenekaA.KaragiannidisA.GodoliasG. (2010). Assessment of patients with neck pain: A review of definitions, selection criteria, and measurement tools. J. Chiropr. Med.9, 49–59. 10.1016/j.jcm.2010.03.002
42
MurrayM.LangeB.ChreitehS. S.OlsenH. B.NornbergB. R.BoyleE.et al (2016). Neck and shoulder muscle activity and posture among helicopter pilots and crew-members during military helicopter flight. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.27, 10–17. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.12.009
43
MurrayM.LangeB.NornbergB. R.SogaardK.SjogaardG. (2017). Self-administered physical exercise training as treatment of neck and shoulder pain among military helicopter pilots and crew: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord.18, 147. 10.1186/s12891-017-1507-3
44
MurrayM.LangeB.NornbergB. R.SogaardK.SjogaardG. (2015). Specific exercise training for reducing neck and shoulder pain among military helicopter pilots and crew members: A randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord.16, 198. 10.1186/s12891-015-0655-6
45
MurrayM.LangeB.SogaardK.SjogaardG. (2020). The effect of physical exercise training on neck and shoulder muscle function among military helicopter pilots and crew: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Front. Public Health8, 546286. 10.3389/fpubh.2020.546286
46
NagaiT.AbtJ. P.SellT. C.ClarkN. C.SmalleyB. W.WirtM. D.et al (2014). Neck proprioception, strength, flexibility, and posture in pilots with and without neck pain history. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.85, 529–535. 10.3357/asem.3874.2014
47
NettoK. J.BurnettA. F.ColemanJ. L. (2007). Neck exercises compared to muscle activation during aerial combat maneuvers. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.78, 478–484.
48
NettoK. J.BurnettA. F. (2006). Neck muscle activation and head postures in common high performance aerial combat maneuvers. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.77, 1049–1055.
49
NewmanD. G. (1997). +GZ-induced neck injuries in Royal Australian Air Force fighter pilots. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.68, 520–524.
50
O'conorD. K.DalalS.RamachandranV.ShiversB.ShenderB. S.JonesJ. A. (2020). Crew-friendly countermeasures against musculoskeletal injuries in aviation and spaceflight. Front. Physiol.11, 837. 10.3389/fphys.2020.00837
51
OmholtM. L.TveitoT. H.IhlebaekC. (2017). Subjective health complaints, work-related stress and self-efficacy in Norwegian aircrew. Occup. Med.67, 135–142. 10.1093/occmed/kqw127
52
PageM. J.MckenzieJ. E.HigginsJ. P. T. (2018). Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: A systematic review. BMJ Open8, e019703. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019703
53
ParkS. H.LeeM. M. (2020). Effects of lower trapezius strengthening exercises on pain, dysfunction, posture alignment, muscle thickness and contraction rate in patients with neck pain; randomized controlled trial. Med. Sci. Monit.26, e920208. 10.12659/MSM.920208
54
PoschM.SchranzA.LenerM.SennW.AngB. O.BurtscherM.et al (2019). Prevalence and potential risk factors of flight-related neck, shoulder and low back pain among helicopter pilots and crewmembers: A questionnaire-based study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord.20, 44. 10.1186/s12891-019-2421-7
55
PriceJ.RushtonA.TyrosI.TyrosV.HeneghanN. R. (2020). Effectiveness and optimal dosage of exercise training for chronic non-specific neck pain: A systematic review with a narrative synthesis. PLoS One15, e0234511. 10.1371/journal.pone.0234511
56
PurushothamS.StephensonR. S.SandersonA.AbichandaniD.GreigC.GardnerA.et al (2022). Microscopic changes in the spinal extensor musculature in people with chronic spinal pain: A systematic review. Spine J.22, 1205–1221. 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.01.023
57
RauschM.WeberF.KuhnS.LedderhosC.ZinnerC.SperlichB. (2021). The effects of 12 weeks of functional strength training on muscle strength, volume and activity upon exposure to elevated Gz forces in high-performance aircraft personnel. Mil. Med. Res.8, 15. 10.1186/s40779-021-00305-8
58
RintalaH.HakkinenA.SiitonenS.KyrolainenH. (2015). Relationships between physical fitness, demands of flight duty, and musculoskeletal symptoms among military pilots. Mil. Med.180, 1233–1238. 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00467
59
SaeterbakkenA. H.NordengenS.AndersenV.FimlandM. S. (2017). Nordic walking and specific strength training for neck- and shoulder pain in office workers: A pilot-study. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med.53, 928–935. 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04623-8
60
SalmonD. M.HarrisonM. F.NearyJ. P. (2011). Neck pain in military helicopter aircrew and the role of exercise therapy. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.82, 978–987. 10.3357/asem.2841.2011
61
SalmonD. M.HarrisonM. F.SharpeD.CandowD.AlbertW. J.NearyJ. P. (2013). Exercise therapy for improved neck muscle function in helicopter aircrew. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.84, 1046–1054. 10.3357/asem.3593.2013
62
SelistreL. F. A.MeloC. S.NoronhaM. A. (2021). Reliability and validity of clinical tests for measuring strength or endurance of cervical muscles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.102, 1210–1227. 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.11.018
63
SjøgaardG.JustesenJ. B.MurrayM.DalagerT.SøgaardK. (2014). A conceptual model for worksite intelligent physical exercise training--IPET--intervention for decreasing life style health risk indicators among employees: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health14, 652. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-652
64
SongR.ZhaoX.ZhangD. Q.WangR.FengY. (2021). Lower levels of irisin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract.175, 108788. 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108788
65
SoveliusR.MantylaM.HeiniH.OksaJ.ValtonenR.TiitolaL.et al (2019). Joint helmet-mounted cueing system and neck muscle activity during air combat maneuvering. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform.90, 834–840. 10.3357/AMHP.5281.2019
66
SoveliusR.MantylaM.HuhtalaH.OksaJ.ValtonenR.TiitolaL.et al (2020). Head movements and neck muscle activity during air combat maneuvering. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform.91, 26–31. 10.3357/AMHP.5425.2020
67
SoveliusR.OksaJ.RintalaH.HuhtalaH.YlinenJ.SiitonenS. (2006). Trampoline exercise vs. strength training to reduce neck strain in fighter pilots. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.77, 20–25.
68
StangA. (2010). Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur. J. Epidemiol.25, 603–605. 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z
69
StasinakiA. N.GloumisG.SpengosK.BlazevichA. J.ZarasN.GeorgiadisG.et al (2015). Muscle strength, power, and morphologic adaptations after 6 Weeks of compound vs. Complex training in healthy men. J. Strength Cond. Res.29, 2559–2569. 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000917
70
StergiouA.TzoufiM.NtzaniE.VarvarousisD.BerisA.PloumisA. (2017). Therapeutic effects of horseback riding interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil.96, 717–725. 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000726
71
SterneJ. A.SuttonA. J.IoannidisJ. P.TerrinN.JonesD. R.LauJ.et al (2011). Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ343, d4002. 10.1136/bmj.d4002
72
StroupD. F.BerlinJ. A.MortonS. C.OlkinI.WilliamsonG. D.RennieD.et al (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-Analysis of observational studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. Jama283, 2008–2012. 10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
73
TanB. (1999). Manipulating resistance training program variables to optimize maximum strength in men: A review. J. Strength Cond. Res.13, 289–304. 10.1519/1533-4287(1999)013<0289:mrtpvt>2.0.co;2
74
ThoolenS. J.van Den OordM. H. (2015). Modern air combat developments and their influence on neck and back pain in F-16 pilots. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform.86, 936–941. 10.3357/AMHP.4303.2015
75
TreleavenJ.JullG.AtkinsonL. (1994). Cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction in post-concussional headache. Cephalalgia14, 273–279. 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1994.1404273.x
76
UhligY.WeberB. R.GrobD.MüntenerM. (1995). Fiber composition and fiber transformations in neck muscles of patients with dysfunction of the cervical spine. J. Orthop. Res.13, 240–249. 10.1002/jor.1100130212
77
VerdeP.TrivelloniP.AngelinoG.MorgagniF.TomaoE. (2015). Neck pain in F-16 vs. Typhoon fighter pilots. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform.86, 402–406. 10.3357/AMHP.4063.2015
78
VisserB.Van DieënJ. H. (2006). Pathophysiology of upper extremity muscle disorders. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol.16, 1–16. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.06.005
79
WalingK.SundelinG.AhlgrenC.JärvholmB. (2000). Perceived pain before and after three exercise programs--a controlled clinical trial of women with work-related trapezius myalgia. Pain85, 201–207. 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00265-1
80
WallaceJ. B.NewmanP. M.McgarveyA.OsmotherlyP. G.SpratfordW.GabbettT. J. (2021). Factors associated with neck pain in fighter aircrew: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup. Environ. Med.78, 900–912. 10.1136/oemed-2020-107103
81
WeiF. L.GaoQ. Y.HengW.ZhuK. L.YangF.duR. M.et al (2022). Association of robot-assisted techniques with the accuracy rates of pedicle screw placement: A network pooling analysis. EClinicalMedicine48, 101421. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101421
82
ZebisM. K.AndersenL. L.PedersenM. T.MortensenP.AndersenC. H.PedersenM. M.et al (2011). Implementation of neck/shoulder exercises for pain relief among industrial workers: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord.12, 205. 10.1186/1471-2474-12-205
83
ZhangF.WangK.duP.YangW.HeY.LiT.et al (2021). Risk of stroke in cancer survivors: A meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies. Neurology96, e513–e526. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011264
84
ZhaoJ.DongX.ZhangZ.GaoQ.ZhangY.SongJ.et al (2022). Association of use of tourniquets during total knee arthroplasty in the elderly patients with post-operative pain and return to function. Front. Public Health10, 825408. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.825408
Summary
Keywords
physical exercise, musculoskeletal disorders, neck pain, muscle strength, military pilots, meta-analysis
Citation
Heng W, Wei F, Liu Z, Yan X, Zhu K, Yang F, Du M, Zhou C and Qian J (2022) Physical exercise improved muscle strength and pain on neck and shoulder in military pilots. Front. Physiol. 13:973304. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.973304
Received
20 June 2022
Accepted
08 August 2022
Published
02 September 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Kwong Ming Tse, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia
Reviewed by
Aleksandra Truszczyńska-Baszak, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Poland
Haiyang Wu, Tianjin Medical University, China
Yujie Liu, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Heng, Wei, Liu, Yan, Zhu, Yang, Du, Zhou and Qian.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Chengpei Zhou, zhoucpei@126.com; Jixian Qian, pasmiss2012@163.com
† These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Exercise Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.