Abstract
One possible explanation for magnetosensing in biology, such as avian magnetoreception, is based on the spin dynamics of certain chemical reactions that involve radical pairs. Radical pairs have been suggested to also play a role in anesthesia, hyperactivity, neurogenesis, circadian clock rhythm, microtubule assembly, etc. It thus seems critical to probe the credibility of such models. One way to do so is through isotope effects with different nuclear spins. Here we briefly review the papers involving spin-related isotope effects in biology. We suggest studying isotope effects can be an interesting avenue for quantum biology.
In atoms, the number of protons determines the element (e.g. carbon, oxygen, etc.), and the number of neutrons determines the isotope of the desired element. It has been observed that different isotopes of the element in certain chemical reactions can influence the outcomes differently. This has been shown in many chemical reactions (; Zel’dovich et al., 1988; Wolfsberg et al., 2009; Faure, 1977; Hoefs and Hoefs, 2009; Fry, 2006; Van Hook, 2011; ) including biological systems (Cook, 1991; Grissom, 1995; Kohen and Limbach, 2005; ; Buchachenko et al., 2012; Koltover, 2021). Not only do different isotopes of an element have different masses, but they can also possess different spin angular momentum, which has a magnetic property. Thus, one can consider isotope effects in (bio)chemical reactions from two distinct points of view: mass- and spin-dependency. Isotope effects have been reported for numerous (bio)chemical reactions (Buchachenko et al., 2012; ; ; ; Bukhvostov et al., 2014; ; ; Buchachenko et al., 2020; Koltover, 2021; Letuta, 2021). Sechzer and et al. observed that administering different lithium isotopes resulted in different parenting behaviors and potentially delayed offspring development in rats (Sechzer et al., 1986). In 2020, Ettenberg co-workers (Ettenberg et al., 2020) reported that lithium isotope effect on rat’s hyperactivity, where 6Li produced a longer suppression of hyperactivity in an animal model of mania compared to 7Li. Buchachenko et al. reported that ATP production was more than twofold in the presence of 25Mg compared to 24Mg. They suggested that the different nuclear spin of these isotopes was the key to these observations. The same group, in multiple studies, also observed that 25Mg reduced enzymatic activity in DNA synthesis compared to 24Mg, where the rate of DNA synthesis was suggested to be magnetic field-dependent (Buchachenko et al., 2013a; Buchachenko et al., 2013b; Stovbun et al., 2023). They also observed isotope effects by replacing magnesium with calcium and zinc ions (Buchachenko et al., 2010; Bukhvostov et al., 2013). Li et al. observed that different xenon isotopes induced anesthesia in mice differently. In that experiment, four different xenon isotopes were used, 129Xe, 131Xe, 132Xe, and 134Xe with nuclear spins of 1/2, 3/2, 0, and 0, respectively (Li et al., 2018). They reported that isotopes of xenon with non-zero nuclear spin had lower anesthetic potency than isotopes without nuclear spin.
The first mass-independent isotope effect was detected by Buchachenko and co-workers in 1976 (), in which applied magnetic fields discriminated isotope effects by their nuclear spins and nuclear magnetic moments. Since then, the term “magnetic isotope effect” was introduced for such phenomena as they are controlled by electron-nuclear hyperfine coupling in the paramagnetic species.
The sensitivity of biological systems to weak magnetic fields is an intriguing phenomenon (Zadeh-Haghighi and Simon, 2022a), yet incompletely understood. It is challenging to understand because the corresponding energies for such low fields are far smaller than the energies for thermal fluctuations and motions. So from a classical point of view, these effects should be washed out. But that is not the case.
One possible explanation for such effects is based on the spin dynamics of naturally occurring radical pairs, namely the radical pair mechanism (Hore and Mouritsen, 2016). Spin has a magnetic property, and thus for every spin, any surrounding magnetic field from either other spins or applied magnetic field influences its state. On the other hand, spin states can determine which chemical reactions are possible, providing a mechanism for magnetic fields to influence chemical reaction products. A considerable amount of studies suggest that isotope effects in biology can be due to the spin dynamics of radical pairs in biochemical reactions.
In the context of avian magnetoreception (Xu et al., 2021), it was suggested that substituting 17O2 for 16O2 would strongly attenuate magnetosensing and also accelerate the generation of the fully oxidized state of flavin adenine dinucleotide (FADox) (Player and Hore, 2019). Recent studies have proposed that radical pair models help explain isotope effects in xenon anesthesia (Smith et al., 2021) and lithium treatment for hyperactivity (Zadeh-Haghighi and Simon, 2021). In these models, it is proposed that anesthesia and hyperactivity involve spin-selective electron transfer, and different isotopes of xenon and lithium influence the electron transfer process differently due to the hyperfine interaction between the xenon or lithium nuclear spin and the electron spin of the radicals, and hence possess different potency. Based on similar models, it has also been suggested that isotope effects can be tested in the role of superoxide in neurogenesis (Rishabh et al., 2022), the effect of lithium on the circadian clock (Zadeh-Haghighi and Simon, 2022b), and the effect of zinc on microtubule assembly (Zadeh-Haghighi and Simon, 2022c).
It is also worth mentioning that non-mass-dependent effects or mass-independent fractionation in isotope effects have been observed with oxygen, sulfur, mercury, lead, and thallium (Thiemens and Heidenreich, 1983; Thiemens, 1999; Thiemens et al., 2001; Thiemens, 2006; Schauble, 2007; Thiemens et al., 2012), which are based on non-magnetic mechanisms. However, it is reported that biomolecules susceptible to oxidation by reactive oxygen species (ROS) can be protected using heavier isotopes such as 2H (D, deuterium) and 13C (carbon-13) (Shchepinov, 2007). Moreover, in numerous studies, magnetic field effects in biology are accompanied by modulation in the ROS levels (Zadeh-Haghighi and Simon, 2022a). This suggests radical pairs might be involved in such ROS-related effects.
Exploring isotope effects may thus be a potential avenue to probe the radial pair mechanism hypothesis and ultimately to see whether Nature harnesses quantum physics in biology. We hope that this short article will encourage experimental experts in the field of quantum biology to test isotope effects. Furthermore, this could pave new paths for discovering new medicine and treatments.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
HZ-H: Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. CS: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by NSERC Discovery Grant RGPIN-2020-03945 and National Research Council CSTIP Grant QSP 022.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Michael Wieser for his valuable input.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
ArkhangelskayaE. Y.VorobyevaN. Y.LeonovS. V.OsipovA. N.BuchachenkoA. L. (2020). Magnetic isotope effect on the repair of radiation-induced DNA damage. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B14, 314–317. 10.1134/s1990793120020177
2
BigeleisenJ. (1965). Chemistry of Isotopes: isotope chemistry has opened new areas of chemical physics, geochemistry, and molecular biology. Science147, 463–471. 10.1126/science.147.3657.463
3
BuchachenkoA. (2009). Magnetic isotope effect in chemistry and biochemistry. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
4
BuchachenkoA.BukhvostovA.ErmakovK.KuznetsovD. (2019). Nuclear spin selectivity in enzymatic catalysis: a caution for applied biophysics. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.667, 30–35. 10.1016/j.abb.2019.04.005
5
BuchachenkoA.GalimovE.ErshovV.NikiforovG.PershinA. (1976). Isotopic enrichment induced by magnetic-interactions in chemical-reactions. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. Sssr228, 379–381.
6
BuchachenkoA. L. (2001). Magnetic isotope effect: nuclear spin control of chemical reactions. J. Phys. Chem. A105, 9995–10011. 10.1021/jp011261d
7
BuchachenkoA. L. (2013). Mass-independent isotope effects. J. Phys. Chem. B117, 2231–2238. 10.1021/jp308727w
8
BuchachenkoA. L. (2014a). Magnetic field-dependent molecular and chemical processes in biochemistry, genetics and medicine. Russ. Chem. Rev.83, 1–12. 10.1070/rc2014v083n01abeh004335
9
BuchachenkoA. L. (2014b). Magnetic control of enzymatic phosphorylation. J. P. Chem. Biophysics.2. 10.4172/2161-0398.1000142
10
BuchachenkoA. L.BukhvostovA. A.ErmakovK. V.KuznetsovD. A. (2020). A specific role of magnetic isotopes in biological and ecological systems. physics and biophysics beyond. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.155, 1–19. 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2020.02.007
11
BuchachenkoA. L.ChekhoninV. P.OrlovA. P.KuznetsovD. A. (2010). Zinc-related magnetic isotope effect in the enzymatic ATP synthesis: a medicinal potential of the nuclear spin selectivity phenomena. Int. J. Mol. Med. Adv. Sci.6, 34–37. 10.3923/ijmmas.2010.34.37
12
BuchachenkoA. L.KuznetsovD. A.BreslavskayaN. N. (2012). Chemistry of enzymatic ATP synthesis: an insight through the isotope window. Chem. Rev.112, 2042–2058. 10.1021/cr200142a
13
BuchachenkoA. L.OrlovA. P.KuznetsovD. A.BreslavskayaN. N. (2013a). Magnetic control of the DNA synthesis. Chem. Phys. Lett.586, 138–142. 10.1016/j.cplett.2013.07.056
14
BuchachenkoA. L.OrlovA. P.KuznetsovD. A.BreslavskayaN. N. (2013b). Magnetic isotope and magnetic field effects on the DNA synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res.41, 8300–8307. 10.1093/nar/gkt537
15
BukhvostovA.NapolovJ.BuchachenkoA.KuznetsovD. (2014). A new platform for anti-cancer experimental pharmacology: the dna repair enzyme affected. Brit J. Pharmacol. Toxicol.5, 35–41. 10.19026/bjpt.5.5414
16
BukhvostovA. A.ShatalovO. A.BuchachenkoA. L.KuznetsovD. A. (2013). 43Ca2+–paramagnetic impact on dna polymerase beta function as it relates to a molecular pharmacology of leukemias. Der Pharm. Lettr5, 18–26.
17
CookP. F. (1991). Enzyme mechanism from isotope effects. Boca Raton, FL: Crc Press.
18
EttenbergA.AyalaK.KrugJ. T.CollinsL.MayesM. S.FisherM. P. A. (2020). Differential effects of lithium isotopes in a ketamine-induced hyperactivity model of mania. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.190, 172875. 10.1016/j.pbb.2020.172875
19
FaureG. (1977). Principles of isotope geology. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
20
FryB. (2006). Stable isotope ecology, 521. Springer.
21
GrissomC. B. (1995). Magnetic field effects in biology: a survey of possible mechanisms with emphasis on radical-pair recombination. Chem. Rev.95, 3–24. 10.1021/cr00033a001
22
HoefsJ.HoefsJ. (2009). Stable isotope geochemistry, 285. Springer.
23
HoreP. J.MouritsenH. (2016). The radical-pair mechanism of magnetoreception. Annu.Rev. Biophys.45, 299–344. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-032116-094545
24
KohenA.LimbachH.-H. (2005). Isotope effects in chemistry and biology. Boca Raton, FL: cRc Press.
25
KoltoverV. K. (2021). Nuclear spin catalysis in biochemical physics. Russ. Chem. Bull.70, 1633–1639. 10.1007/s11172-021-3264-6
26
LetutaU. G. (2021). Magnesium magnetic isotope effects in microbiology. Arch. Microbiol.203, 1853–1861. 10.1007/s00203-021-02219-4
27
LiN.LuD.YangL.TaoH.XuY.WangC.et al (2018). Nuclear spin attenuates the anesthetic potency of xenon isotopes in mice: implications for the mechanisms of anesthesia and consciousness. Anesthesiology129, 271–277. 10.1097/aln.0000000000002226
28
PlayerT. C.HoreP. J. (2019). Viability of superoxide-containing radical pairs as magnetoreceptors. J. Chem. Phys.151, 225101. 10.1063/1.5129608
29
RishabhR.Zadeh-HaghighiH.SalahubD.SimonC. (2022). Radical pairs may explain reactive oxygen species-mediated effects of hypomagnetic field on neurogenesis. PLOS Comput. Biol.18, e1010198. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010198
30
SchaubleE. A. (2007). Role of nuclear volume in driving equilibrium stable isotope fractionation of mercury, thallium, and other very heavy elements. Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta71, 2170–2189. 10.1016/j.gca.2007.02.004
31
SechzerJ. A.LiebermanK. W.AlexanderG. J.WeidmanD.StokesP. E. (1986). Aberrant parenting and delayed offspring development in rats exposed to lithium. Biol. Psychiatry21, 1258–1266. 10.1016/0006-3223(86)90308-2
32
ShchepinovM. S. (2007). Reactive oxygen species, isotope effect, essential nutrients, and enhanced longevity. Rejuvenation Res.10, 47–59. 10.1089/rej.2006.0506
33
SmithJ.Zadeh-HaghighiH.SalahubD.SimonC. (2021). Radical pairs may play a role in xenon-induced general anesthesia. Sci. Rep.11, 6287. 10.1038/s41598-021-85673-w
34
StovbunS. V.ZlenkoD. V.BukhvostovA. A.VedenkinA. S.SkoblinA. A.KuznetsovD. A.et al (2023). Magnetic field and nuclear spin influence on the DNA synthesis rate. Sci. Rep.13, 465. 10.1038/s41598-022-26744-4
35
ThiemensM. H. (1999). Mass-independent isotope effects in planetary atmospheres and the early solar system. Science283, 341–345. 10.1126/science.283.5400.341
36
ThiemensM. H. (2006). History and applications of mass-independent isotope effects. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.34, 217–262. 10.1146/annurev.earth.34.031405.125026
37
ThiemensM. H.ChakrabortyS.DominguezG. (2012). The physical chemistry of mass-independent isotope effects and their observation in nature. Annu. Rev. Phys.Chem.63, 155–177. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143657
38
ThiemensM. H.HeidenreichJ. E. (1983). The mass-independent fractionation of oxygen: a novel isotope effect and its possible cosmochemical implications. Science219, 1073–1075. 10.1126/science.219.4588.1073
39
ThiemensM. H.SavarinoJ.FarquharJ.BaoH. (2001). Mass-independent isotopic compositions in terrestrial and extraterrestrial solids and their applications. Accounts Chem. Res.34, 645–652. 10.1021/ar960224f
40
Van HookW. A. (2011). Isotope effects in chemistry. Nukleonika56, 217–240.
41
WolfsbergM.HookW. A.PanethP.RebeloL. P. N. (2009). Isotope effects. Springer Netherlands.
42
XuJ.JarochaL. E.ZollitschT.KonowalczykM.HenbestK. B.RichertS.et al (2021). Magnetic sensitivity of cryptochrome 4 from a migratory songbird. Nature594, 535–540. 10.1038/s41586-021-03618-9
43
Zadeh-HaghighiH.SimonC. (2021). Entangled radicals may explain lithium effects on hyperactivity. Sci. Rep.11, 12121. 10.1038/s41598-021-91388-9
44
Zadeh-HaghighiH.SimonC. (2022a). Magnetic field effects in biology from the perspective of the radical pair mechanism. J. R. Soc. Interface19, 20220325. 10.1098/rsif.2022.0325
45
Zadeh-HaghighiH.SimonC. (2022b). Radical pairs can explain magnetic field and lithium effects on the circadian clock. Sci. Rep.12, 269. 10.1038/s41598-021-04334-0
46
Zadeh-HaghighiH.SimonC. (2022c). Radical pairs may play a role in microtubule reorganization. Sci. Rep.12, 6109. 10.1038/s41598-022-10068-4
47
Zel’dovichY. B.BuchachenkoA. L.FrankevichE. L. (1988). Magnetic-spin effects in chemistry and molecular physics. Sov. Phys. Uspekhi31, 385–408. 10.1070/pu1988v031n05abeh003544
Summary
Keywords
magnetic isotope effects in biology, radical pair mechanism, quantum spin, spin chemistry, quantum biology
Citation
Zadeh-Haghighi H and Simon C (2023) Magnetic isotope effects: a potential testing ground for quantum biology. Front. Physiol. 14:1338479. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1338479
Received
14 November 2023
Accepted
29 November 2023
Published
11 December 2023
Volume
14 - 2023
Edited by
Margit Christine Egg, University of Innsbruck, Austria
Reviewed by
Luca Turin, University of Buckingham, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Zadeh-Haghighi and Simon.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hadi Zadeh-Haghighi, hadi.zadehhaghighi@ucalgary.ca
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.