Abstract
The complex and dynamic interaction between cellular energy control and gene expression modulation is shown by the intersection between mitochondrial metabolism and epigenetics in hypoxic environments. Poor oxygen delivery to tissues, or hypoxia, is a basic physiological stressor that sets off a series of reactions in cells to adapt and endure oxygen-starved environments. Often called the “powerhouse of the cell,” mitochondria are essential to cellular metabolism, especially regarding producing energy through oxidative phosphorylation. The cellular response to hypoxia entails a change in mitochondrial metabolism to improve survival, including epigenetic modifications that control gene expression without altering the underlying genome. By altering the expression of genes involved in angiogenesis, cell survival, and metabolism, these epigenetic modifications help cells adapt to hypoxia. The sophisticated interplay between mitochondrial metabolism and epigenetics in hypoxia is highlighted by several important points, which have been summarized in the current article. Deciphering the relationship between mitochondrial metabolism and epigenetics during hypoxia is essential to understanding the molecular processes that regulate cellular adaptation to reduced oxygen concentrations.
Introduction
Widely referred to as the “powerhouse of the cell,” mitochondria utilize the process of oxidative phosphorylation to produce ATP, fueling basic physiological functions of the cell, including growth, movement, and homeostasis. In addition to their role in carbon metabolism, mitochondria also play critical physiological roles in regulating apoptosis (Wang and Youle, 2009), inflammation (Marchi et al., 2023), reactive oxygen species production (Zorov et al., 2014), calcium signaling (Rizzuto et al., 2012), and steroid synthesis. (Miller, 2013). Consequently, mitochondrial dysfunction has been associated with a range of human diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and certain types of cancer. (Lin and Beal, 2006; Sivitz and Yorek, 2010; Poznyak et al., 2020).
Derived from an alphaproteobacterial endosymbiont, mitochondria are ubiquitous eukaryotic organelles composed of two distinct membranes that encapsulate an intermembrane space and matrix (Gray et al., 1979). Mitochondria contain their own maternally inherited genome of circular, double-stranded DNA (mtDNA) that is packaged into nucleoids (Kukat et al., 2011; ). The mammalian mitochondrial genome encodes 13 proteins, 22 transfer RNAs, and 2 ribosomal RNAs. Both mtDNA and nuclear DNA contribute to the development of the electron transport chain (ETC), which drives oxidative phosphorylation (Habbane et al., 2021). Within the ETC, electrons participate in a sequence of redox reactions, releasing energy in the form of a proton gradient. Essential to normal cell function, oxygen serves as the final electron acceptor in the ETC, allowing the energy from the proton motive force to be harnessed by ATP-synthase to produce ATP (Nolfi-Donegan et al., 2020).
While oxygen is required by all mammalian cells, different tissues are exposed to varying concentrations under physiological (i.e., physioxic) conditions, reflecting differences in metabolic demands (Ncbi, 2024). Within peripheral tissues, levels of oxygen correlate to a balance between supply and demand, ensuring proper physiological function while avoiding oxygen toxicity or hypoxia (i.e., a state of insufficient oxygen delivery) (Pias, 2020). For instance, interaction of lung tissue with atmospheric air during respiration exposes alveoli to about 13.5% oxygen (translating to a partial pressure of roughly 100 mm Hg), though these values can change depending on factors such as altitude and respiratory status (McKeown, 2014). Alternatively, in the adult human brain, physioxic oxygen levels can range between 11 and 53 mmHg depending on the region, with levels below 10 mmHg considered hypoxic with resulting impairment in ATP production (Zhang K. et al., 2011). Similarly, in skeletal muscle, oxygen concentration generally varies between 15 and 76 mmHg depending on location. When oxygen levels within skeletal muscles fall below 15 mmHg, the tissue is considered hypoxic and becomes increasingly reliant on adaptive mechanisms to maintain viability (Pircher et al., 2021).
In hypoxia, cells cannot meet their energy demands through oxidative phosphorylation. Adaptive mechanisms are triggered within mammalian cells to promote cell survival and reestablish a normoxic environment (Paffett and Walker, 2007). Such mechanisms are regulated primarily by hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs)—heterodimeric transcription factors that influence expression of genes meant to maintain cellular homeostasis and increase oxygen delivery to deprived tissues (). HIFs are composed of an unstable α-subunit paired with a constitutively expressed HIF-β subunit (also known as aryl-hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, ARNT) (Sousa Fialho et al., 2019). Three isoforms of α-subunit exist: HIF1-α, HIF2-α, and HIF3-α. While each regulates a unique catalog of genes, all α-subunits are collectively under the control of various proteins known as α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases. One example of such proteins is members of the prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) family (Weidemann and Johnson, 2008). During periods of sufficient oxygen delivery, diatomic oxygen is recognized by these prolyl hydroxylase enzymes, which respond as their name suggests by hydroxylating conserved proline residues within HIF-α subunits (Wong et al., 2013). Hydroxylation of HIF-α proline residues creates a binding site for the tumor-suppressor protein von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)—a polyubiquitin ligase which functions to ubiquitinate α-subunits and mark them for proteasomal degradation (Li and Kim, 2011). Conversely, when oxygen concentrations are insufficient to meet cellular metabolic demands, PHD proteins are inactive, leaving α-subunits free to accumulate and dimerize with HIF-β monomers (Ziello et al., 2007). HIF-α subunits are also subject to regulation by another class of oxygen-dependent enzymes known as asparaginyl hydroxylases, specifically Factor Inhibiting HIF (FIH-1) (Sim et al., 2018). While PHDs primarily target proline residues on HIF-α subunits for hydroxylation, FIH-1 instead hydroxylates asparagine residues within the HIF-α C-terminal transactivation domain (CTAD) (Lando et al., 2002). Such hydroxylation events inhibit interactions between HIF-α and necessary transcriptional co-activators p300/CBP, thereby serving to negatively regulate HIF transcriptional activity in the presence of physioxic conditions. Alternatively, if oxygen concentrations are below threshold levels, FIH-1 cannot carry out hydroxylation reactions and HIF-α subunits are allowed to accumulate and interact with HIF-β and impact gene expression (Zhang et al., 2010). The completed HIF cytosolic complex is then translocated to the nucleus where it interacts with specific DNA domains known as hypoxia-response elements (HREs) (Kaluz et al., 2008). Interaction with HIFs at these loci activates transcription of a diverse array of genes (some reviews estimating upwards of 200), earning them the moniker of “master regulators” of oxygen homeostasis ().
In addition to oxygen, PHD and FIH-1 enzymes (and thus HIF activity) are also regulated by intermediates of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA cycle, also known as the citric acid cycle or Kreb’s cycle) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Hagen, 2012; ). In particular, TCA intermediates succinate and fumarate can inhibit hydroxylation by these enzymes by competing with α-ketoglutarate and interfering with its function as a required co-substrate (). Ultimately, such interactions result in stabilization of HIF-α subunits and formation of HIF transcriptional complexes, even under normoxic conditions—a phenomenon known as pseudohypoxia (Hayashi et al., 2019). However, the effects of ROS on hydroxylase function are more nuanced and may differ depending on the levels of oxidative stress. For instance, moderate levels of ROS can stimulate PHD and FIH-1 activity, thus promoting hydroxylation of HIF-α and ultimately dampening HIF transcriptional effects. However, when cells are under significant oxidative stress, the resulting high levels of ROS production serve to interfere with PHD and FIH-1 activity, thereby stabilizing HIF-α and increasing transcription of HIF-controlled genes (). Such high levels of TCA intermediates and ROS with resulting PHD/FIH-1 dysregulation is seen in periods of metabolic stress and have been implicated in various pathological conditions, including cancer, inflammation, and ischemic diseases.
The range of cellular functions affected by HIF signaling pathways is indeed vast, all culminating in a response that hardens cells to the hypoxic environment in which they find themselves (Luo et al., 2022). Briefly, HIF activation exerts considerable influence over the body’s oxygen delivery capacity by promoting angiogenesis and erythropoiesis, while also modulating cellular oxygen utilization and progression through the cell cycle (Krock et al., 2011; Haase, 2013; Ortmann et al., 2014; Thomas and Ashcroft, 2019).
As the major consumers of oxygen within cells, mitochondria are exquisitely sensitive to decreased oxygen availability (). Importantly, hypoxia and HIF signaling also control mitochondrial function through the modification of organelle morphology, metabolic activity, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation (Huang et al., 2022). Such mechanisms are critical for maintaining cell viability during periods of physiological hypoxia (e.g., altitude changes, physical exertion) and promoting a return to homeostatic conditions (Kumar and Choi, 2015; Taylor and Scholz, 2022). However, these same pathways may also be conscripted in various disease states and utilized in ways that promote pathogenesis and disease progression (Park et al., 2004; Lee et al., 2019). Accordingly, a better understanding of the physiologic response to hypoxia can uncover novel therapeutic approaches for a variety of morbid conditions including cancer, diabetes, and inflammatory disorders. In this review, we discuss hypoxia signaling pathways within mitochondria, highlighting the significance of these pathways and their impact on the epigenome.
Hypoxia signaling and mitochondrial function
As was discussed above, HIF is the primary effector of the cellular response to hypoxia, and HIF-mediated changes in gene expression have a profound impact on many facets of mitochondrial function, particularly as it relates to energy metabolism (Li et al., 2022).
As one example, HIF signaling induces the suppression of oxidative phosphorylation and a transition towards anaerobic glycolysis, allowing cells to continually meet energy demands while simultaneously reducing oxygen requirements (Li et al., 2019). Under normoxic conditions, glycolysis results in the generation of pyruvate, which is ultimately transported into the mitochondria and converted to acetyl-CoA via the enzyme pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) (Naifeh et al., 2023). In the process, the reduced cofactor NADH is also generated. (). Once acetyl-CoA has been produced within mitochondria, it enters the TCA cycle where it can be used to generate additional reduced cofactors (). The electrons in NADH and FADH2 are then fed into the mitochondrial ETC, wherein a series of protein complexes utilize the energy to establish a proton motive force (). As electrons pass through the ETC complexes, some prematurely combine with diatomic oxygen and result in the production of ROS (i.e., superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radical) that have the potential to damage mitochondrial and extra-mitochondrial macromolecules (Zhao et al., 2019). Passage of protons through membrane-bound ATP synthase complex and back into the mitochondrial matrix then allows for the generation of ATP, which completes the process of oxidative phosphorylation (Neupane et al., 2019). However, during periods of hypoxia, HIF-1 induces the expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1), which functions to inhibit PDH and prevent the conversion of pyruvate into acetyl-CoA (Kim et al., 2006). Decreased acetyl-CoA reduces flux through the TCA cycle, which ultimately results in decreased generation of reduced cofactors NADH and FADH2, decreased flux through the ETC, and consequently, decreased oxygen consumption (Kim et al., 2006; Martínez-Reyes and Chandel, 2020; Taylor and Scholz, 2022). At the same time, HIF-1 upregulates expression of the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), which allows for the reduction of accumulating cytosolic pyruvate into lactate (). The importance of this process is that it allows for the regeneration of oxidized NAD+, which can then be used in repetitive cycles of glycolysis to allow for continued ATP generation via anaerobic mechanisms (Spinicci et al., 2022). To further enhance this shift in metabolism, HIF-1 also acts to upregulate expression of all enzymes in the glycolytic pathway, as well as glucose transporters GLUT1 and GLUT3 in order to increase cellular glucose uptake and maintain sufficient levels of ATP production (Kierans and Taylor, 2021; ). In summary, the HIF-mediated shift in cellular metabolism away from aerobic respiration significantly reduces oxygen demand, while also reducing mitochondrial ROS production and protecting the cell against radical-mediated damage (Samanta and Semenza, 2017) (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
Furthermore, HIF-1 impacts mitochondrial bioenergetics via its influence over LON protease and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4 (Semenza, 2011; Voos and Pollecker, 2020). LON protease is a mitochondrial ATP-dependent protease that normally functions to degrade misfolded proteins and maintain mitochondrial protein quality during periods of oxidative stress (Voos and Pollecker, 2020). When oxygen levels are low, HIF-1 upregulates expression of the LON protease gene to help block inappropriate buildup of damaged proteins and ensure proper mitochondrial function and energy production under hypoxic conditions (). Cytochrome c oxidase (COX), also known as complex IV, is a key enzyme complex in the mitochondrial ETC responsible for the final step of aerobic respiration (i.e., reduction of oxygen to water.) COX4 is a regulatory subunit of this complex with two distinct isoforms, COX4-1 and COX4-2, both of which are regulated by HIF-1 (). Under hypoxic conditions, HIF-1 activation leads to increased expression of COX4-2 and decreased expression of COX4-1 (via LON protease-mediated degradation), helping to optimize mitochondrial function under low oxygen conditions (). For example, upregulation of COX4-2 may enhance efficiency of oxygen utilization by the ETC due to its higher affinity for oxygen compared to COX4-1, allowing for relatively lower concentrations of oxygen to produce sufficient levels of ATP (). In tandem, downregulation of COX4-1 expression may reflect an adaptive response to prioritize COX4-2 synthesis and optimize mitochondrial bioenergetics in low-oxygen environments (Huang et al., 2022).
In addition to changes in metabolism, HIFs also function to regulate levels of mitochondria within cells via influence over several mitochondrial homeostatic mechanisms (Huang et al., 2022). Together, these actions serve to prevent ROS production by mitochondria, and thus limit the potential for further cellular damage during periods of hypoxia (Špaková et al., 2021). For instance, HIF-1 has been shown to decrease mitochondrial biogenesis through the transcriptional activation of MAX interactor 1 (MXI1) (; Löfstedt et al., 2009). This increase in MXI1 causes MYC to form a dimer with MXI1. The MXI1-MYC complex then binds to E-box elements in the nucleus and blocks the promoter region for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator 1α and 1β (PGC1α/β), thus expression of PGC1α/β is reduced (O'Hagan et al., 2009; LaGory et al., 2015). Whereas normally, PGC1α/β acts to increase mitochondrial biogenesis, a decrease in protein levels leads to a reduction in mitochondrial mass with a concurrent reduction in ROS generation. Moreover, hypoxia, via HIF-1 signaling, induces mitochondrial autophagy (also known as mitophagy) in a process requiring HIF-1-dependent expression of BCL2-interacting protein 3 (BNIP3) (Zhang et al., 2019; Halling and Pilegaard, 2020; Zhao et al., 2020). Interestingly, while BNIP3 is normally a pro-apoptotic mediator, Bellot et al. reported that its activation by HIF-1 and subsequent induction of mitophagy can limit ROS production and provide alternative sources of nutrients and energy during hypoxic conditions (). Upregulation of mitophagy recycles damaged mitochondria that would otherwise trigger apoptosis, thus the balance between apoptosis and mitophagy shifts away from apoptosis and cell survival is increased.
Finally, HIF regulated gene expression has been shown to influence mitochondrial dynamics, primarily via the promotion of fission and inhibition of mitochondrial fusion. Fission—the process of mitochondrial segmentation into smaller discrete organelles—is also implicated in the promotion of mitophagy (; ). The primary protein regulating mitochondrial fission is dynamin related protein 1 (DRP1), a cytosolic GTPase whose expression is directly upregulated by HIF-1 (Matilainen et al., 2017). The upregulation of fission by HIF-1 during periods of hypoxia suggests this process could serve as a protective mechanism against hypoxia-induced mitochondrial damage, in addition to limiting aerobic respiratory capacity and ROS production.
Mitochondrial metabolism and epigenetic modifications
While it is evident that mitochondria play a crucial role in glucose and lipid metabolism, recent studies over the last decade have revealed roles beyond cellular energy production. Normal mitochondrial function is essential for providing key intermediate metabolites necessary for epigenetic modifications within the nuclear genome, such as DNA and histone modifications (Matilainen et al., 2017). These modifications regulate gene expression through alterations in chromatin structure and/or by modulating the access of regulatory proteins and transcription machinery (Miller and Grant, 2013). As described above, hypoxic conditions have a profound effect on mitochondrial metabolism, thereby altering the levels of the key metabolites that function within this mitochondria-nuclear crosstalk (Lopes A, 2020; Wiese and Bannister, 2020).
For example, α-ketoglutarate and acetyl-CoA generated through mitochondrial metabolism have been observed to influence histone modification. Within the mitochondrial matrix, citrate synthase converts acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate into citrate. Under a high-energy state, the mitochondrial citrate carrier (CiC) within the inner mitochondrial membrane exports citrate into the cytosol. There, in the presence of ATP and CoA, it is subsequently metabolized to acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate via ATP-citrate lyase (ACLY) (Figure 2). The extramitochondrial acetyl-CoA produced not only supports lipogenesis but also serves as a key acetyl group donor for histone acetylation by histone acetyltransferases (HAT) (Wellen et al., 2009; Tarazona and Pourquié, 2020; Mosaoa et al., 2021). While not fully understood, the loosening of chromatin structure and the subsequent increase in gene expression through histone acetylation are believed to enhance the availability of TCA intermediates, such as α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), which is an important cofactor for histone demethylases (). While CiC expression and activity are primarily governed by intracellular energy states, hypoxia has been shown to play a role in upregulating CiC gene expression. Under hypoxia, CiC expression is mediated by the stabilization and activation of HIF-1α. HIF-1α binds to the promoter region of the CiC gene, promoting its transcription, thereby enhancing the transport of citrate from mitochondria to cytosol to support metabolic adaptations in low oxygen conditions. Increased cytosolic citrate results in elevated acetyl-CoA levels, contributing to increased histone acetylation. Conversely, under normoxia, CiC expression is typically lower due to the absence of HIF-1α activation, resulting in reduced citrate transport activity and decreased histone acetylation (Mosaoa et al., 2021). For example, a study investigating the role of oxygen levels in mesenchymal stem cell differentiation found that under normoxic conditions, the activity of CiC is impaired, resulting in elevated acetyl-CoA levels within the mitochondria. The accumulation of acetyl-CoA in the mitochondria then increases oxidative metabolism and decreases histone acetylation. However, under hypoxic conditions, CiC activity was upregulated, resulting in increased export of acetyl-CoA and subsequent histone acetylation, thus allowing for mesenchymal stem cell differentiation (Morganti et al., 2020; Pouikli et al., 2022). In a different study, exposure to acute or chronic cycling of hypoxia also resulted in increased expression of CIC in lung cancer, prostate, and glioblastoma cells (Hlouschek et al., 2018).
FIGURE 2
Sirtuins (SIRT), members of class III histone deacetylases, have also been implicated as important regulators of histone acetylation (; Lisowski et al., 2018; Pecher et al., 2020). Mammals have 7 SIRT proteins, namely, SIRT1 through SIRT7, each with its own specialized function and subcellular localization. SIRT1, SIRT6, and SIRT7 are primarily located in the nucleus, while SIRT3, SIRT4, and SIRT5 reside in mitochondria, and SIRT2 predominantly occupies the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments (Turrens, 2003). These sirtuins are exposed to different pools of NAD+/NADH depending on their subcellular localization. The SIRTs predominantly found in the nucleus—SIRT1, SIRT6, and SIRT7—are activated by an increase in the NAD+/NADH ratio because SIRTs use NAD + as a substrate. Importantly, these SIRTs are histone deacetylases (HDACs) that transfer acetyl groups of lysine residues on histones to NAD+ (; Yun et al., 2012; Gut and Verdin, 2013; Lee, 2019). Under hypoxic conditions, mitochondrial oxidative metabolism is inhibited, resulting in a decrease in NAD+, which primarily affects the activity of mitochondrial SIRT3, SIRT4, and SIRT5, leading to altered mitochondrial metabolism and antioxidant activity. This decrease in NAD + leads to decreased SIRT activity and decreased histone deacetylation within the nucleus, along with concomitant histone hyperacetylation, thus resulting in unregulated DNA transcription. Under normoxia, the NAD+/NADH ratio remains adequate for SIRTs located in the nucleus to exert their regulatory effects on histone acetylation.
As discussed, the electron transport chain (ETC) on the inner membrane of mitochondria facilitates the production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) through a series of electron-transfer reactions that pump protons into the mitochondrial intermembrane space to create a driving force for ATP synthase to produce ATP (Turrens, 2003). Generally, oxygen serves as the final electron acceptor in the ETC but oxygen can also be prematurely reduced by electrons in the ETC to form superoxide anions (O2⋅−). Superoxide is classified as a reactive oxygen species (ROS) because it contains an unpaired electron known as a free radical, making it unstable and reactive. Superoxide is also a precursor for many other ROS and can be converted to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) spontaneously or in a reaction catalyzed by enzymes in the superoxide dismutase family. ROS may be beneficial at moderate levels to play a role in cellular signaling, but an excess of ROS drives the oxidation of macromolecules leading to cell damage (). Through several mechanisms, ROS can also modify DNA bases and histones, and therefore alter the epigenome of a cell (Kietzmann et al., 2017).
Although hyperoxia corresponds to an increase in ROS production due to the availability of excess oxygen for premature reduction, hypoxia has also been found to promote increased ROS production (Guzy et al., 2005). While many intracellular sites contribute to ROS generation, mitochondria are recognized as a principal source (Sies and Jones, 2020). Specifically, complex I plays a significant role in sensing acute hypoxia and is known for its high capacity to produce ROS, primarily generating superoxide and hydrogen peroxide (; Okoye et al., 2023). Interestingly, the activity of complex I has been shown to be regulated by reversible oxidation, thereby providing an intervention to attenuate the adverse effects of hypoxia (Onukwufor et al., 2022).
Furthermore, under hypoxic conditions, the quinone-binding sites (Qi and Qo) of complex III, are critical sites of increased superoxide generation. In complex III, production of superoxide at the Qo site enhances the release of superoxide into the intermembrane space where it can diffuse to the cytosol (). The superoxide dismutases found in the intermembrane space and cytosol contain copper and zinc in their active sites. Alternatively, ROS in the intermembrane space can be converted to less reactive forms by reducing cytochrome c and returning the extra electron to the ETC. Superoxide produced at the Qi site of complex III is released into the mitochondrial matrix (). These ROS can be neutralized by the form of superoxide dismutase expressed in the matrix, which contains manganese as the active metal. The manganese-containing superoxide dismutase is upregulated in response to various cellular stressors such as increased oxygen concentration ().
Although excessive ROS production in hypoxia can lead to cell death, sublethal levels can offer protective benefits by inhibiting prolyl hydroxylase domain (PDH), the inhibitor of HIF-1a and thus upregulating HIF-1a levels. (Tafani et al., 2016). Increased HIF-1a leads to upregulation of proteins that facilitate angiogenesis, proliferation, and stem cell renewal. (Tafani et al., 2016).
Mitochondrial metabolism and epigenetic reprogramming
Reactive oxygen species (ROS), as highly reactive oxygen-containing intermediates, also have considerable influence over the delicate equilibrium of stem cell potency, reprogramming, and mitochondrial function. Maintaining STEM cell pluripotency relies on the precise regulation of ROS levels, encompassing superoxide radical anion (O2⋅ −), hydroxyl radical (⋅OH), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and lipid hydroperoxides (LOOH) (Ivanova and Lyublinskaya, 2021). Low ROS levels play a pivotal role in preserving genome integrity and preventing differentiation (Tan and Suda, 2018; ). Mitochondrial ROS generation inhibition becomes imperative for sustained pluripotency, orchestrated by key players such as superoxide dismutase 1 and 2 (SOD1/2) strategically positioned in the mitochondrial intermembrane space and matrix. Peroxiredoxins further modulate H2O2 levels (Palma et al., 2020). In addition, transcription factors, including the Forkhead Box Protein O (FOXO) family and nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (NRF2), intricately govern the expression of antioxidant genes (Liang and Ghaffari, 2018; Tan and Suda, 2018). Intriguingly, inhibition of the mitochondrial electron transport chain during STEM cell reprogramming towards glycolytic metabolism is associated with a reduction in ROS (Jaworska et al., 2023). Conversely, mutations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mark a significant increase in ROS generation, impacting the efficiency of pluripotent stem cell reprogramming and self-renewal capacity (Hämäläinen et al., 2015).
The profound impact of mitochondrial metabolism on epigenetic reprogramming and cell-fate decisions unfolds through the lens of the 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase (2OGDDs) superfamily. Comprising Jumonji C-domain-containing histone demethylases (JHD) and ten–eleven translocation (TET) methylcytosine dioxygenase enzymes, this superfamily orchestrates histone and DNA demethylation processes (). The TET family, particularly TETs 1-3, assumes a pivotal role in converting 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC), a demethylating base (Lio and Rao, 2019). Under hypoxia, TET1 and TET2 activity is upregulated, leading to increased transcription of glycolytic genes (). Mitochondrial dysfunction and the accumulation of succinate and fumarate, however, inhibit TET activity, resulting in reduced 5-hmC levels (Laukka et al., 2016). JHDs also act as α-ketoglutarate-dependent mechanisms for cytosine demethylation, face inhibition from succinate and fumarate, further underscoring the nuanced regulatory network governing STEM cell fate (; Ly et al., 2020). Additionally, pyruvate metabolism and regulation also play a role in the maintenance of pluripotency and preventing differentiation in stem cells. Uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) is upregulated in pluripotent STEM cells and is responsible for shunting pyruvate away from mitochondria, associated with the shift towards glycolytic metabolism (Zhang J. et al., 2011). During stem cell differentiation, however, UCP2 is downregulated (Rupprecht et al., 2019).
Summary
In hypoxic conditions, the junction of mitochondrial metabolism and epigenetics demonstrates the multifaceted and dynamic interconnection between cellular energy regulation and gene expression modification. Hypoxia is a fundamental physiological stressor that triggers a series of cellular events to adapt and survive under oxygen-starved conditions. To increase survival, cells respond to hypoxia by altering their metabolism. Mitochondrial metabolic intermediates are critical to epigenetic modifications in the nuclear genome, regulating gene expression by modifying the structure of DNA and histone proteins without altering the underlying genetic instructions. Therefore, under hypoxic conditions, mitochondrial metabolism is linked to epigenetic changes. Moreover, hypoxia also impacts reactive oxygen species (ROS) concentrations, the formation of which is significantly regulated by mitochondria, subsequently influencing changes in the epigenome. These epigenetic changes aid in the adaptation of cells to hypoxia by modifying the expression of genes related to angiogenesis, cell survival, and metabolism. This article provides a summary of the main ideas that emphasize the intricate relationship between mitochondrial metabolism and epigenetics in hypoxia.
Discussion and future direction
The complex relationship between cellular energy regulation and gene expression modulation is exemplified by the intersection of mitochondrial metabolism and epigenetics in hypoxic environments. During hypoxia, cells are unable to meet their energy requirements through oxidative phosphorylation, prompting the activation of adaptive mechanisms largely governed by hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs). These adaptive responses, orchestrated by a variety of HIF-induced signaling pathways, ultimately aim to preserve cellular homeostasis under unfavorable conditions. Hypoxia and HIF signaling also exert control over mitochondria, which are major consumers of oxygen within the cell, by modifying metabolic pathways, ROS production, and organelle morphology.
As summarized in this article, the downstream effects of hypoxia are linked to epigenetic changes within the cell, highlighting the role of mitochondria as epigenetic regulators in both normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Understanding the relationship between mitochondrial metabolism and epigenetics is crucial for deciphering the molecular mechanisms underlying cellular adaptation to reduced oxygen concentrations. Moreover, it holds significant implications for various fields, including aging, ischemic disease, and cancer.
In conclusion, continued research into the crosstalk between mitochondrial metabolism and epigenetics in hypoxic environments will shed light on fundamental cellular processes and may lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies for conditions influenced by hypoxia.
Statements
Author contributions
ML: Data curation, Validation, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. JK: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. JR: Data curation, Validation, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. SS: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. MM: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. YL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AlabduladhemT. O. (2022). Physiology, krebs cycle. StatPearls. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556032/.
2
AljoufiA.ZhangC.RopaJ.ChangW.PalamL. R.CooperS.et al (2022). Physioxia-induced downregulation of Tet2 in hematopoietic stem cells contributes to enhanced self-renewal. Blood140 (11), 1263–1277. 10.1182/blood.2022015499
3
AvgustinovaA.BenitahS. A. (2016). Epigenetic control of adult stem cell function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.17 (10), 643–658. 10.1038/nrm.2016.76
4
BaileyP.NathanJ. (2018). Metabolic regulation of hypoxia-inducible transcription factors: the role of small molecule metabolites and iron. Biomedicines6 (2), 60. 10.3390/biomedicines6020060
5
BaoX.ZhangJ.HuangG.YanJ.XuC.DouZ.et al (2021). The crosstalk between HIFs and mitochondrial dysfunctions in cancer development. Cell Death Dis.12 (2), 215. 10.1038/s41419-021-03505-1
6
BargielaD.BurrS. P.ChinneryP. F. (2018). Mitochondria and hypoxia: metabolic crosstalk in cell-fate decisions. Trends Endocrinol. Metabolism29 (4), 249–259. 10.1016/j.tem.2018.02.002
7
BellotG.Garcia-MedinaR.GounonP.ChicheJ.RouxD.PouysségurJ.et al (2009). Hypoxia-induced autophagy is mediated through hypoxia-inducible factor induction of BNIP3 and BNIP3L via their BH3 domains. Mol. Cell Biol.29 (10), 2570–2581. 10.1128/MCB.00166-09
8
BurmanJ. L.PicklesS.WangC.SekineS.VargasJ. N. S.ZhangZ.et al (2017). Mitochondrial fission facilitates the selective mitophagy of protein aggregates. J. Cell Biol.216 (10), 3231–3247. 10.1083/jcb.201612106
9
ChakrabartyR. P.ChandelN. S. (2021). Mitochondria as signaling organelles control mammalian stem cell fate. Cell Stem Cell28 (3), 394–408. 10.1016/j.stem.2021.02.011
10
ChangY. L.ChangS. D.ChaoA. S.SieberM.TsaiC. L.ChengP. J. (2022). Effect of hypoxia on glucose transporter 1 and 3 gene expression in placental mesenchymal stem cells derived from growth-restricted fetuses. Genes (Basel)13 (5), 752. 10.3390/genes13050752
11
ChaudhryR. (2023). Biochemistry. StatPearls. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482303/.
12
ChenQ.VazquezE. J.MoghaddasS.HoppelC. L.LesnefskyE. J. (2003). Production of reactive oxygen species by mitochondria: central role of complex III. J. Biol. Chem.278 (38), 36027–36031. 10.1074/jbc.M304854200
13
ChenX.YaoJ. M.FangX.ZhangC.YangY. S.HuC. P.et al (2019). Hypoxia promotes pulmonary vascular remodeling via HIF-1α to regulate mitochondrial dynamics. J. Geriatr. Cardiol.16 (12), 855–871. 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.12.003
14
ChinneryP. F.HudsonG. (2013). Mitochondrial genetics. Br. Med. Bull.106 (1), 135–159. 10.1093/bmb/ldt017
15
ChoudhryH.HarrisA. L. (2018). Advances in hypoxia-inducible factor biology. Cell Metab.27 (2), 281–298. 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.10.005
16
CooperG. M. (2000). The mechanism of oxidative phosphorylation. Cell - NCBI Bookshelf. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9885/.
17
CornP. G.RicciM. S.ScataK. A.ArshamA. M.SimonM. C.DickerD. T.et al (2005). Mxi1 is induced by hypoxia in a HIF-1–dependent manner and protects cells from c-Myc-induced apoptosis. Cancer Biol. Ther.4 (11), 1285–1294. 10.4161/cbt.4.11.2299
18
CuiX. gangHanZ. taohuiHe S.WuX. d.ChenT. R.ShaoC. H.et al (2017). HIF1/2α mediates hypoxia-induced LDHA expression in human pancreatic cancer cells. Oncotarget8 (15), 24840–24852. 10.18632/oncotarget.15266
19
DenkoN. C.FontanaL. A.HudsonK. M.SutphinP. D.RaychaudhuriS.AltmanR.et al (2003). Investigating hypoxic tumor physiology through gene expression patterns. Oncogene22 (37), 5907–5914. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206703
20
DouievL.MillerC.RuppoS.BenyaminiH.Abu-LibdehB.SaadaA. (2021). Upregulation of COX4-2 via HIF-1α in mitochondrial COX4-1 deficiency. Cells10 (2), 452. 10.3390/cells10020452
21
DrögeW. (2002). Free radicals in the physiological control of cell function. Physiol. Rev.82 (1), 47–95. 10.1152/physrev.00018.2001
22
DuongQ. V.LevitskyY.DessingerM. J.Strubbe-RiveraJ. O.BazilJ. N. (2021). Identifying site-specific superoxide and hydrogen peroxide production rates from the mitochondrial electron transport system using a computational strategy. Function2 (6), zqab050. 10.1093/function/zqab050
23
FongG. H.TakedaK. (2008). Role and regulation of prolyl hydroxylase domain proteins. Cell Death Differ.15 (4), 635–641. 10.1038/cdd.2008.10
24
FridovichI. (1995). SUPEROXIDE RADICAL AND SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASES. Annu. Rev. Biochem.64 (1), 97–112. 10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.000525
25
FuhrmannD. C.BrüneB. (2017). Mitochondrial composition and function under the control of hypoxia. Redox Biol.12, 208–215. 10.1016/j.redox.2017.02.012
26
FukudaR.ZhangH.KimJ. W.ShimodaL.DangC. V.SemenzaG. L. (2007). HIF-1 regulates cytochrome oxidase subunits to optimize efficiency of respiration in hypoxic cells. Cell129 (1), 111–122. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.047
27
GaoT.Díaz-HirashiZ.VerdeguerF. (2018). Metabolic signaling into chromatin modifications in the regulation of gene expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci.19 (12), 4108. 10.3390/ijms19124108
28
GarofaloO.CoxD. W. G.BachelardH. S. (1988). Brain levels of NADH and NAD + under hypoxic and hypoglycaemic conditions in vitro. J. Neurochem.51 (1), 172–176. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1988.tb04851.x
29
GhirottoB.TerraF. F.CâmaraN. O. S.BassoP. J. (2019). Sirtuins in B lymphocytes metabolism and function. World J. Exp. Med.9 (1), 1–13. 10.5493/wjem.v9.i1.1
30
GrabowskaW.SikoraE.Bielak-ZmijewskaA. (2017). Sirtuins, a promising target in slowing down the ageing process. Biogerontology18 (4), 447–476. 10.1007/s10522-017-9685-9
31
GrayM. W.BurgerG.LangB. F. (1979). Mitochondrial evolution. Science283 (5407), 1476–1481. 10.1126/science.283.5407.1476
32
GutP.VerdinE. (2013). The nexus of chromatin regulation and intermediary metabolism. Nature502 (7472), 489–498. 10.1038/nature12752
33
GuzyR. D.HoyosB.RobinE.ChenH.LiuL.MansfieldK. D.et al (2005). Mitochondrial complex III is required for hypoxia-induced ROS production and cellular oxygen sensing. Cell Metab.1 (6), 401–408. 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.05.001
34
HaaseV. H. (2013). Regulation of erythropoiesis by hypoxia-inducible factors. Blood Rev.27 (1), 41–53. 10.1016/j.blre.2012.12.003
35
HabbaneM.MontoyaJ.RhoudaT.SbaouiY.RadallahD.EmperadorS. (2021). Human mitochondrial DNA: particularities and diseases. Biomedicines9 (10), 1364. 10.3390/biomedicines9101364
36
HagenT. (2012). Oxygen versus Reactive Oxygen in the Regulation of the Balance Tips. Biochem. Res. Int.2012, 1–5. 10.1155/2012/436981
37
HallingJ. F.PilegaardH. (2020). PGC-1α-mediated regulation of mitochondrial function and physiological implications. Appl. Physiology, Nutr. Metabolism45 (9), 927–936. 10.1139/apnm-2020-0005
38
HämäläinenR. H.AhlqvistK. J.EllonenP.LepistöM.LoganA.OtonkoskiT.et al (2015). mtDNA mutagenesis disrupts pluripotent stem cell function by altering redox signaling. Cell Rep.11 (10), 1614–1624. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.05.009
39
HayashiY.YokotaA.HaradaH.HuangG. (2019). Hypoxia/pseudohypoxia-mediated activation of hypoxia-inducible factor‐1α in cancer. Cancer Sci.110 (5), 1510–1517. 10.1111/cas.13990
40
HlouschekJ.HanselC.JendrossekV.MatschkeJ. (2018). The mitochondrial citrate carrier (SLC25A1) sustains redox homeostasis and mitochondrial metabolism supporting radioresistance of cancer cells with tolerance to cycling severe hypoxia. Front. Oncol.8, 170. 10.3389/fonc.2018.00170
41
HuangX.ZhaoL.PengR. (2022). Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and mitochondria: an intimate connection. Biomolecules13 (1), 50. 10.3390/biom13010050
42
IvanovaJ. S.LyublinskayaO. G. (2021). Redox homeostasis and regulation in pluripotent stem cells: uniqueness or versatility?Int. J. Mol. Sci.22 (20), 10946. 10.3390/ijms222010946
43
JaworskaM.SzczudłoJ.PietrzykA.ShahJ.TrojanS. E.OstrowskaB.et al (2023). The Warburg effect: a score for many instruments in the concert of cancer and cancer niche cells. Pharmacol. Rep.75 (4), 876–890. 10.1007/s43440-023-00504-1
44
KaluzS.KaluzováM.StanbridgeE. J. (2008). Regulation of gene expression by hypoxia: integration of the HIF-transduced hypoxic signal at the hypoxia-responsive element. Clin. Chim. Acta395 (1-2), 6–13. 10.1016/j.cca.2008.05.002
45
KieransS. J.TaylorC. T. (2021). Regulation of glycolysis by the hypoxia‐inducible factor (HIF): implications for cellular physiology. J. Physiol.599 (1), 23–37. 10.1113/JP280572
46
KietzmannT.PetryA.ShvetsovaA.GerholdJ. M.GörlachA. (2017). The epigenetic landscape related to reactive oxygen species formation in the cardiovascular system. Br. J. Pharmacol.174 (12), 1533–1554. 10.1111/bph.13792
47
KimJ. W.TchernyshyovI.SemenzaG. L.DangC. V. (2006). HIF-1-mediated expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase: a metabolic switch required for cellular adaptation to hypoxia. Cell Metab.3 (3), 177–185. 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.02.002
48
KobayashiS.ZhaoF.ZhangZ.KobayashiT.HuangY.ShiB.et al (2020). Mitochondrial fission and mitophagy coordinately restrict high glucose toxicity in cardiomyocytes. Front. Physiol.11, 604069. 10.3389/fphys.2020.604069
49
KrockB. L.SkuliN.SimonM. C. (2011). Hypoxia-induced angiogenesis: good and evil. Genes Cancer2 (12), 1117–1133. 10.1177/1947601911423654
50
KukatC.WurmC. A.SpåhrH.FalkenbergM.LarssonN. G.JakobsS. (2011). Super-resolution microscopy reveals that mammalian mitochondrial nucleoids have a uniform size and frequently contain a single copy of mtDNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.108 (33), 13534–13539. 10.1073/pnas.1109263108
51
KumarH.ChoiD. K. (2015). Hypoxia inducible factor pathway and physiological adaptation: a cell survival pathway?Mediat. Inflamm.2015, 584758–584811. 10.1155/2015/584758
52
LaGoryE. L.WuC.TaniguchiC. M.DingC. K. C.ChiJ. T.von EybenR.et al (2015). Suppression of PGC-1α is critical for reprogramming oxidative metabolism in renal cell carcinoma. Cell Rep.12 (1), 116–127. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.006
53
LandoD.PeetD. J.GormanJ. J.WhelanD. A.WhitelawM. L.BruickR. K. (2002). FIH-1 is an asparaginyl hydroxylase enzyme that regulates the transcriptional activity of hypoxia-inducible factor. Genes Dev.16 (12), 1466–1471. 10.1101/gad.991402
54
LaukkaT.MarianiC. J.IhantolaT.CaoJ. Z.HokkanenJ.KaelinW. G.et al (2016). Fumarate and succinate regulate expression of hypoxia-inducible genes via TET enzymes. J. Biol. Chem.291 (8), 4256–4265. 10.1074/jbc.M115.688762
55
LeeI.SuzukiC. K. (2008). Functional mechanics of the ATP-dependent Lon protease-lessons from endogenous protein and synthetic peptide substrates. Biochimica Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins Proteomics1784 (5), 727–735. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.02.010
56
LeeI. H. (2019). Mechanisms and disease implications of sirtuin-mediated autophagic regulation. Exp. Mol. Med.51 (9), 1–11. 10.1038/s12276-019-0302-7
57
LeeJ. W.KoJ.JuC.EltzschigH. K. (2019). Hypoxia signaling in human diseases and therapeutic targets. Exp. Mol. Med.51 (6), 1–13. 10.1038/s12276-019-0235-1
58
LiH. S.ZhouY. N.LiL.LiS. F.LongD.ChenX. L.et al (2019). HIF-1α protects against oxidative stress by directly targeting mitochondria. Redox Biol.25, 101109. 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101109
59
LiJ. P.LiuY. J.ZengS. H.GaoH. J.ChenY. G.ZouX. (2022). Identification of COX4I2 as a hypoxia-associated gene acting through FGF1 to promote EMT and angiogenesis in CRC. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett.27 (1), 76. 10.1186/s11658-022-00380-2
60
LiM.KimW. Y. (2011). Two sides to every story: the HIF-dependent and HIF-independent functions of pVHL. J. Cell Mol. Med.15 (2), 187–195. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01238.x
61
LiangR.GhaffariS. (2018). Stem cells seen through the FOXO lens: an evolving paradigm. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.127, 23–47. 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2017.11.006
62
LinM. T.BealM. F. (2006). Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature443 (7113), 787–795. 10.1038/nature05292
63
LioC. W. J.RaoA. (2019). TET enzymes and 5hmC in adaptive and innate immune systems. Front. Immunol.10, 210. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00210
64
LisowskiP.KannanP.MlodyB.PrigioneA. (2018). Mitochondria and the dynamic control of stem cell homeostasis. EMBO Rep.19 (5), e45432. 10.15252/embr.201745432
65
LöfstedtT.FredlundE.NogueraR.NavarroS.Holmquist-MengelbierL.BeckmanS.et al (2009). HIF-1alpha induces MXI1 by alternate promoter usage in human neuroblastoma cells. Exp. Cell Res.315 (11), 1924–1936. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.02.015
66
Lopes AF. C. (2020). Mitochondrial metabolism and DNA methylation: a review of the interaction between two genomes. Clin. Epigenetics12 (1), 182. 10.1186/s13148-020-00976-5
67
LuoZ.TianM.YangG.TanQ.ChenY.et al (2022). Hypoxia signaling in human health and diseases: implications and prospects for therapeutics. Signal Transduct. Target Ther.7 (1), 218. 10.1038/s41392-022-01080-1
68
LyC. H.LynchG. S.RyallJ. G. (2020). A metabolic roadmap for somatic stem cell fate. Cell Metab.31 (6), 1052–1067. 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.04.022
69
MarchiS.GuilbaudE.TaitS. W. G.YamazakiT.GalluzziL. (2023). Mitochondrial control of inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol.23 (3), 159–173. 10.1038/s41577-022-00760-x
70
Martínez-ReyesI.ChandelN. S. (2020). Mitochondrial TCA cycle metabolites control physiology and disease. Nat. Commun.11 (1), 102. 10.1038/s41467-019-13668-3
71
MatilainenO.QuirósP. M.AuwerxJ. (2017). Mitochondria and epigenetics – crosstalk in homeostasis and stress. Trends Cell Biol.27 (6), 453–463. 10.1016/j.tcb.2017.02.004
72
McKeownS. R. (2014). Defining normoxia, physoxia and hypoxia in tumours—implications for treatment response. Br. J. Radiol.87 (1035), 20130676. 10.1259/bjr.20130676
73
MillerJ. L.GrantP. A. (2013). The role of DNA methylation and histone modifications in transcriptional regulation in humans. Subcell. Biochem.61, 289–317. 10.1007/978-94-007-4525-4_13
74
MillerW. L. (2013). Steroid hormone synthesis in mitochondria. Mol. Cell Endocrinol.379 (1-2), 62–73. 10.1016/j.mce.2013.04.014
75
MorgantiC.BonoraM.MarchiS.FerroniL.GardinC.WieckowskiM. R.et al (2020). Citrate mediates crosstalk between mitochondria and the nucleus to promote human mesenchymal stem cell in vitro osteogenesis. Cells9 (4), 1034. 10.3390/cells9041034
76
MosaoaR.Kasprzyk-PawelecA.FernandezH. R.AvantaggiatiM. L. (2021). The mitochondrial citrate carrier SLC25A1/CIC and the fundamental role of citrate in cancer, inflammation and beyond. Biomolecules11 (2), 141. 10.3390/biom11020141
77
NaifehJ.DimriM.VaracalloM. (2023). Aerobic glycolysis. StatPearls. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470170/.
78
Ncbi (2024). Rhodes CE DDVMPOTransport [updated 2022 N 14]. IS. TI (FL): SP 2024 J. A. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538336/.
79
NeupaneP.BhujuS.ThapaN.BhattaraiH. K. (2019). ATP synthase: structure, function and inhibition. Biomol. Concepts10 (1), 1–10. 10.1515/bmc-2019-0001
80
Nolfi-DoneganD.BraganzaA.ShivaS. (2020). Mitochondrial electron transport chain: oxidative phosphorylation, oxidant production, and methods of measurement. Redox Biol.37, 101674. 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101674
81
O'HaganK. A.CocchigliaS.ZhdanovA. V.TambuwalaM. M.TambawalaM. M.CumminsE. P.et al (2009). PGC-1alpha is coupled to HIF-1alpha-dependent gene expression by increasing mitochondrial oxygen consumption in skeletal muscle cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.106 (7), 2188–2193. 10.1073/pnas.0808801106
82
OkoyeC. N.KorenS. A.WojtovichA. P. (2023). Mitochondrial complex I ROS production and redox signaling in hypoxia. Redox Biol.67, 102926. 10.1016/j.redox.2023.102926
83
OnukwuforJ. O.FarooqiM. A.VodičkováA.KorenS. A.BaldzizharA.BerryB. J.et al (2022). A reversible mitochondrial complex I thiol switch mediates hypoxic avoidance behavior in C. elegans. Nat. Commun.13 (1), 2403. 10.1038/s41467-022-30169-y
84
OrtmannB.DrukerJ.RochaS. (2014). Cell cycle progression in response to oxygen levels. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.71 (18), 3569–3582. 10.1007/s00018-014-1645-9
85
PaffettM. L.WalkerB. R. (2007). Vascular adaptations to hypoxia: molecular and cellular mechanisms regulating vascular tone. Essays Biochem.43, 105–119. 10.1042/bse0430105
86
PalmaF. R.HeC.DanesJ. M.PavianiV.CoelhoD. R.GantnerB. N.et al (2020). Mitochondrial superoxide dismutase: what the established, the intriguing, and the novel reveal about a key cellular redox switch. Antioxid. Redox Signal32 (10), 701–714. 10.1089/ars.2019.7962
87
ParkJ. W.ChunY. S.KimM. S. (2004). Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-related diseases and prospective therapeutic tools. J. Pharmacol. Sci.94 (3), 221–232. 10.1254/jphs.94.221
88
PecherS. J.PotthastA. B.von Versen-HöynckF.DasA. M. (2020). Impact of short-term hypoxia on sirtuins as regulatory elements in HUVECs. J. Clin. Med.9 (8), 2604. 10.3390/jcm9082604
89
PiasS. C. (2020). Pathways of oxygen diffusion in cells and tissues: hydrophobic channeling via networked lipids. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.1232, 183–190. 10.1007/978-3-030-34461-0_23
90
PircherT.WackerhageH.AszodiA.KammerlanderC.BöckerW.SallerM. M. (2021). Hypoxic signaling in skeletal muscle maintenance and regeneration: a systematic review. Front. Physiol.12, 684899. 10.3389/fphys.2021.684899
91
PouikliA.MaleszewskaM.ParekhS.YangM.NikopoulouC.BonfiglioJ. J.et al (2022). Hypoxia promotes osteogenesis by facilitating acetyl-CoA-mediated mitochondrial–nuclear communication. EMBO J.41 (23), e111239. 10.15252/embj.2022111239
92
PoznyakA. V.IvanovaE. A.SobeninI. A.YetS. F.OrekhovA. N. (2020). The role of mitochondria in cardiovascular diseases. Biol. (Basel).9 (6), 137. 10.3390/biology9060137
93
RizzutoR.De StefaniD.RaffaelloA.MammucariC. (2012). Mitochondria as sensors and regulators of calcium signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.13 (9), 566–578. 10.1038/nrm3412
94
RupprechtA.MoldzioR.MödlB.PohlE. E. (2019). Glutamine regulates mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 to promote glutaminolysis in neuroblastoma cells. Biochimica Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics.1860 (5), 391–401. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2019.03.006
95
SamantaD.SemenzaG. L. (2017). Maintenance of redox homeostasis by hypoxia-inducible factors. Redox Biol.13, 331–335. 10.1016/j.redox.2017.05.022
96
SemenzaG. L. (2011). Hypoxia-inducible factor 1: regulator of mitochondrial metabolism and mediator of ischemic preconditioning. Biochimica Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Mol. Cell Res.1813 (7), 1263–1268. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.08.006
97
SiesH.JonesD. P. (2020). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.21 (7), 363–383. 10.1038/s41580-020-0230-3
98
SimJ.CowburnA. S.PalazonA.MadhuB.TyrakisP. A.MacíasD.et al (2018). The factor inhibiting HIF asparaginyl hydroxylase regulates oxidative metabolism and accelerates metabolic adaptation to hypoxia. Cell Metab.27 (4), 898–913. 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.02.020
99
SivitzW. I.YorekM. A. (2010). Mitochondrial dysfunction in diabetes: from molecular mechanisms to functional significance and therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid. Redox Signal12 (4), 537–577. 10.1089/ars.2009.2531
100
Sousa FialhoM. da L.Abd JamilA. H.StannardG. A.HeatherL. C. (2019). Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 signalling, metabolism and its therapeutic potential in cardiovascular disease. Biochimica Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Mol. Basis Dis.1865 (4), 831–843. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.09.024
101
ŠpakováI.RabajdováM.MičkováH.GraierW. F.MarekováM. (2021). Effect of hypoxia factors gene silencing on ROS production and metabolic status of A375 malignant melanoma cells. Sci. Rep.11 (1), 10325. 10.1038/s41598-021-89792-2
102
SpinicciK.JacquetP.PowathilG.StéphanouA. (2022). Modeling the role of HIF in the regulation of metabolic key genes LDH and PDH: emergence of Warburg phenotype. Comput. Syst. Oncol.2 (3). 10.1002/cso2.1040
103
TafaniM.SansoneL.LimanaF.ArcangeliT.De SantisE.PoleseM.et al (2016). The interplay of reactive oxygen species, hypoxia, inflammation, and sirtuins in cancer initiation and progression. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev.2016, 3907147–3907218. 10.1155/2016/3907147
104
TanD. Q.SudaT. (2018). Reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial homeostasis as regulators of stem cell fate and function. Antioxid. Redox Signal29 (2), 149–168. 10.1089/ars.2017.7273
105
TarazonaO. A.PourquiéO. (2020). Exploring the influence of cell metabolism on cell fate through protein post-translational modifications. Dev. Cell54 (2), 282–292. 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.06.035
106
TaylorC. T.ScholzC. C. (2022). The effect of HIF on metabolism and immunity. Nat. Rev. Nephrol.18 (9), 573–587. 10.1038/s41581-022-00587-8
107
ThomasL. W.AshcroftM. (2019). Exploring the molecular interface between hypoxia-inducible factor signalling and mitochondria. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.76 (9), 1759–1777. 10.1007/s00018-019-03039-y
108
TurrensJ. F. (2003). Mitochondrial formation of reactive oxygen species. J. Physiol.552 (2), 335–344. 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049478
109
VoosW.PolleckerK. (2020). The mitochondrial lon protease: novel functions off the beaten track?Biomolecules10 (2), 253. 10.3390/biom10020253
110
WangC.YouleR. J. (2009). The role of mitochondria in apoptosis. Annu. Rev. Genet.43 (1), 95–118. 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134850
111
WeidemannA.JohnsonR. S. (2008). Biology of HIF-1alpha. Cell Death Differ.15 (4), 621–627. 10.1038/cdd.2008.12
112
WellenK. E.HatzivassiliouG.SachdevaU. M.BuiT. V.CrossJ. R.ThompsonC. B. (2009). ATP-citrate lyase links cellular metabolism to histone acetylation. Sci. (1979)324 (5930), 1076–1080. 10.1126/science.1164097
113
WieseM.BannisterA. J. (2020). Two genomes, one cell: mitochondrial-nuclear coordination via epigenetic pathways. Mol. Metab.38, 100942. 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.01.006
114
WongB. W.KuchnioA.BruningU.CarmelietP. (2013). Emerging novel functions of the oxygen-sensing prolyl hydroxylase domain enzymes. Trends Biochem. Sci.38 (1), 3–11. 10.1016/j.tibs.2012.10.004
115
YunJ.JohnsonJ. L.HaniganC. L.LocasaleJ. W. (2012). Interactions between epigenetics and metabolism in cancers. Front. Oncol.2, 163. 10.3389/fonc.2012.00163
116
ZerihunM.SukumaranS.QvitN. (2023). The drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission protein interactome as an emerging core player in mitochondrial dynamics and cardiovascular disease therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci.24 (6), 5785. 10.3390/ijms24065785
117
ZhangJ.KhvorostovI.HongJ. S.OktayY.VergnesL.NuebelE.et al (2011b). UCP2 regulates energy metabolism and differentiation potential of human pluripotent stem cells. EMBO J.30 (24), 4860–4873. 10.1038/emboj.2011.401
118
ZhangK.ZhuL.FanM. (2011a). Oxygen, a key factor regulating cell behavior during neurogenesis and cerebral diseases. Front. Mol. Neurosci.4, 5. 10.3389/fnmol.2011.00005
119
ZhangN.FuZ.LinkeS.ChicherJ.GormanJ. J.ViskD.et al (2010). The asparaginyl hydroxylase factor inhibiting HIF-1alpha is an essential regulator of metabolism. Cell Metab.11 (5), 364–378. 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.03.001
120
ZhangY.LiuD.HuH.ZhangP.XieR.CuiW. (2019). HIF-1α/BNIP3 signaling pathway-induced-autophagy plays protective role during myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Biomed. Pharmacother.120, 109464. 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109464
121
ZhaoJ. F.RodgerC. E.AllenG. F. G.WeidlichS.GanleyI. G. (2020). HIF1α-dependent mitophagy facilitates cardiomyoblast differentiation. Cell Stress4 (5), 99–113. 10.15698/cst2020.05.220
122
ZhaoR.JiangS.ZhangL.YuZ. (2019). Mitochondrial electron transport chain, ROS generation and uncoupling (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med.44, 3–15. Published online May 8. 10.3892/ijmm.2019.4188
123
ZielloJ. E.JovinI. S.HuangY. (2007). Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF)-1 regulatory pathway and its potential for therapeutic intervention in malignancy and ischemia. Yale J. Biol. Med.80 (2), 51–60.
124
ZorovD. B.JuhaszovaM.SollottS. J. (2014). Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ROS-induced ROS release. Physiol. Rev.94 (3), 909–950. 10.1152/physrev.00026.2013
Summary
Keywords
mitochondrial metabolism, epigenetic modifications, hypoxia, gene expression, oxygen
Citation
Laird M, Ku JC, Raiten J, Sriram S, Moore M and Li Y (2024) Mitochondrial metabolism regulation and epigenetics in hypoxia. Front. Physiol. 15:1393232. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1393232
Received
28 February 2024
Accepted
13 May 2024
Published
10 June 2024
Volume
15 - 2024
Edited by
Nazzareno Capitanio, University of Foggia, Italy
Reviewed by
Celia Lía Quijano, Universidad de la República, Uruguay
George Arthur Porter, University of Rochester Medical Center, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Laird, Ku, Raiten, Sriram, Moore and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yong Li, yong.li@wmed.edu
† These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.