Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Physiol.

Sec. Skeletal Physiology

Meta-analysis of comparative effects of mobile app–based digital rehabilitation versus traditional rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty

Provisionally accepted
  • The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of digital rehabilitation based on mobile app and traditional rehabilitation program after total knee arthroplasty. Methods: The following electronic databases were systematically searched to identify eligible trials: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and CINAHL. The searches were conducted from database inception to December 1, 2025. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature screening, data extraction and evaluation of its methodological quality were carried out. RevMan5.4 software was used to conduct heterogeneity test and meta-analysis of the included studies, and Cochrane systematic review tool was used to evaluate the literature publication bias. The main outcomes were visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain, "standing walking" timing test, knee function score (KSS), knee range of motion (ROM), and 10-m Walk Test. Results: This meta-analysis included 8 studies involving a total of 694 patients. Compared with traditional rehabilitation, the app-based group showed significantly lower pain scores, as assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with a positive mean difference favoring the app-based group (MD = 1.03, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.75; I² = 0%; P = 0.006).Performance-based functional outcomes favored the app-based group, with significant improvements observed in the Timed Up and Go test (MD = −1.75, 95% CI −2.55 to −0.94; I² = 19%; P < 0.0001) and the 10-m Walk Test (SMD = 0.47, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.88; I² = 0%; P = 0.03). Knee range of motion (ROM) was also significantly greater in the app-based rehabilitation group (MD = 6.46°, 95% CI 2.92 to 10.00; I² = 53%; P = 0.0004). No significant difference was observed in the Knee Society Score (KSS) between groups (P > 0.05). The overall risk of bias among the included studies was moderate, primarily due to unclear allocation concealment and lack of blinding. Conclusion: Compared with traditional rehabilitation, mobile app–based digital rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty was associated with improved pain relief and better performance-based functional outcomes, as well as greater early gains in knee range of motion. No significant difference was observed in composite knee function scores.

Keywords: Digital rehabilitation, Meta-analysis, Mobile apps, Rehabilitation, Total knee arthroplasty

Received: 01 Nov 2025; Accepted: 22 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ma, Liu, Yu and Tan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Meiyun Tan

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.