- Sports Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Sports Medicine and Health, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, China
Sedentary lifestyle is a major risk factor for the occurrence and development of cardiovascular disease, which remains one of the leading contributors to global morbidity and mortality. Beyond inducing endothelial dysfunction, prolonged sedentary patterns trigger chronic inflammation and disrupt endogenous antioxidant defenses, resulting in mitochondrial dysfunction in cardiomyocytes and subsequent impairment of cardiac health. In contrast, regular physical exercise serves as an effective lifestyle intervention that mitigates sedentary-related cardiac damage and improves cardiac function. Mitochondria, as central organelles governing cellular survival and death, are thought to play a pivotal role in mediating the cardioprotective effects of exercise. However, the precise mitochondrial mechanisms underlying these benefits remain incompletely defined. This review aims to summarize current evidence on how exercise regulates mitochondrial function in the heart, with particular emphasis on recent advances linking mitochondrial respiration, dynamics, calcium homeostasis, inflammatory signaling, and oxidative stress to cardiac health. We further propose that exercise-induced improvements in mitochondrial function constitute a core mechanism underlying its cardioprotective effects. By comparing mitochondrial alterations under sedentary and exercise conditions, we provide a clearer mechanistic perspective on how lifestyle behaviors shape cardiac health. Furthermore, this paper also discusses signaling pathways that position mitochondria as key targets of exercise-induced cardiac protection.
Highlights
• Exercise improves cardiac energy metabolism efficiency by enhancing mitochondrial respiration function and dynamics in cardiomyocytes.
• Exercise exerts cardiac protection effects by improving calcium homeostasis in cardiomyocytes and enhancing antioxidant and anti-inflammatory capabilities.
• Exercise offers a non-pharmacological intervention strategy for sedentary-induced myocardial injury by targeting mitochondrial pathways.
1 Introduction
Regular exercise induces systemic adaptive responses that confer broad health benefits, making it an effective strategy for the prevention of various diseases (Dos Santos et al., 2022). However, physical inactivity due to sedentary lifestyles has become a widespread issue in modern society. It not only represents a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease but has also been listed by the World Health Organization (WHO) as one of the top ten leading causes of death in developed countries (Waseem et al., 2022). More importantly, the chronic disease burden resulting from inactivity continues to drive rising healthcare costs, making physical inactivity a critical public health issue that urgently needs to be addressed globally (Nguyen et al., 2022). As a non-pharmacological intervention, exercise offers distinct advantages—including cost-effectiveness, safety, and efficiency—in preventing cardiac disorders and enhancing cardiac function (Laranjo et al., 2024). Regular exercise can promote favorable cardiac remodeling, improve cardiac metabolism and performance, and reduce multiple risk factors associated with chronic diseases, thereby exerting protective effects on the heart and contributing to disease prevention (Chen et al., 2022). Recent studies further suggest that alterations in mitochondrial function within cardiomyocytes may play a central role in the mechanisms underlying exercise-induced cardio protection (Li et al., 2025a).
The heart is composed of multiple cell types, including cardiomyocytes, which are responsible for contractile function, as well as fibroblasts, endothelial cells, immune cells, lymphatic cells, and others that contribute to structural support, signaling regulation, and immune defense. Together, these diverse cell populations maintain cardiac structural integrity and physiological homeostasis (Feng et al., 2023; Xi et al., 2021). Among them, non-myocyte cell groups—such as fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and immune cells—play pivotal roles in exercise-induced cardioprotection. They participate in post-injury repair by suppressing fibrosis and collagen deposition, promoting vascular remodeling, and modulating immune responses, thereby preserving the stability of the cardiac microenvironment (Feng et al., 2023; Xi et al., 2021). Although cardiomyocytes account for only approximately 25%–35% of total cell number in the adult mammalian heart, they occupy nearly 70%–85% of the myocardial volume and are the primary executors of cardiac contractile function (Banerjee et al., 2007). Therefore, this review focuses mainly on mitochondrial function and its core mechanisms within cardiomyocytes, while also addressing the essential contributions of other cardiac cell types to exercise-mediated cardioprotection to provide a more comprehensive and integrated understanding.
Mitochondria are highly dynamic, double-membrane–bound organelles found in eukaryotic cells, serving not only as the primary site of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis but also as key regulators of cardiomyocyte survival and death through dynamic remodeling of their structure and function (Wei et al., 2025). Extensive studies have demonstrated that mitochondria safeguard cardiac energy supply and cellular homeostasis through classical mechanisms, including maintaining respiratory chain function, regulating redox balance, and participating in calcium handling. Collectively, these processes form the biological foundation of exercise-induced cardioprotection (Liang et al., 2024; da Silva et al., 2023). Consequently, the integrity of mitochondrial function is essential for preserving normal cardiac performance, whereas its impairment invariably leads to myocardial injury (Lu et al., 2019).
In addition to its benefits in healthy individuals, exercise also plays an irreplaceable role in the rehabilitation of cardiovascular diseases. Numerous studies have shown that regular physical activity promotes mitochondrial biogenesis, enhances mitochondrial respiration, and regulates the balance between mitochondrial fusion and fission, thereby significantly improving functional recovery following cardiac injury and facilitating the overall remodeling of cardiac performance (Ma et al., 2025b; Perera et al., 2025; Dubois et al., 2024). Therefore, research on exercise-induced cardioprotection should not only focus on adaptive mechanisms under healthy conditions but also emphasize its therapeutic value during post-disease recovery.
This review is based on a systematic search and screening of the literature published over the past two decades across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, using keywords such as ‘exercise,’ ‘cardiac protection,’ ‘mitochondria,’ and ‘cardiomyocyte.’ Inclusion criteria for the literature were as follows: 1. The study is relevant to exercise, cardiac protection, and mitochondrial function; 2. The study provides experimental data or clinical evidence supporting its conclusions; 3. The study is published in a peer-reviewed journal; 4. The study types include laboratory research, clinical studies, clinical trials, and seminal review articles. Exclusion criteria for the literature were as follows: 1. The study employs flawed methodology or insufficient data support; 2. The study is not directly related to the topics of this review; 3. The study is not peer-reviewed or the source is unclear. We prioritized the inclusion of high-quality experimental studies, clinical evidence, and seminal review articles, and we integrated these findings in a structured manner to address the key scientific questions underlying exercise-mediated regulation of cardiac mitochondrial function and its protective effects. Although the beneficial effects of exercise on cardiac mitochondria have been well established, the precise mechanisms through which exercise regulates mitochondrial function to augment cardiac performance remain incompletely defined (Bishop et al., 2025). This article systematically summarizes the unique structural and physiological features of myocardial mitochondria, the relationship between mitochondria and cardiac health, the mitochondrial regulatory mechanisms underlying exercise-induced cardioprotection, and the roles of non-cardiomyocyte cells in mediating the cardioprotective effects of exercise. This review aims to explore the key mechanisms by which exercise-induced modulation of mitochondrial function in cardiomyocytes contributes to cardio protection.
2 Unique structure and physiological functions of cardiac mitochondria
2.1 Unique structural features of cardiac mitochondria
Adult cardiomyocytes are rich in mitochondria, which occupy approximately 30% of the cell volume and appear filamentous under the microscope (Wei et al., 2025). Based on their subcellular localization, cardiac mitochondria are generally categorized into subsarcolemmal mitochondria (SSM), interfibrillar mitochondria (IFM), and perinuclear mitochondria (PNM) (Lu et al., 2019). The mitochondrial structure comprises four compartments, arranged from the inside out as the matrix, inner membrane, intermembrane space, and outer membrane (Yang et al., 2021). The inner membrane contains cristae, which play a key role in oxidative phosphorylation, while the outer membrane regulates mitochondrial dynamics, cellular metabolism, and cell death (Gupta and Becker, 2021; Yang et al., 2021). The intermembrane space is enriched with proteins that serve as a dynamic buffer between the cytoplasm and the matrix (Yao et al., 2022). The mitochondrial matrix is relatively viscous, which affects molecular diffusion and enzymatic reaction efficiency. Furthermore, the metabolic state of cardiomyocytes is closely related to the physical and chemical properties of the matrix (Bulthuis et al., 2023).
In the healthy heart, mitochondria exhibit a highly organized architecture and stable functional capacity. Mitochondria in normal cardiomyocytes are relatively uniform in size, predominantly elongated in shape, and contain sufficient copies of mtDNA to ensure adequate expression of respiratory chain proteins and proper oxidative phosphorylation (Adams et al., 2023; Otten et al., 2020). Studies have shown that mitochondrial membrane potential is maintained at a relatively high level under physiological conditions, supporting robust cellular energy metabolism (Zou et al., 2021). In addition, the inner mitochondrial membrane features densely packed and well-organized cristae, a structural characteristic essential for efficient oxidative phosphorylation and sustained ATP production (Adams et al., 2023).
In diseased states, the structure and function of cardiac mitochondria are broadly compromised, leading to disrupted energy metabolism and impaired cellular performance. Mitochondria in pathological cardiomyocytes often exhibit swelling, fragmentation, or the formation of abnormally enlarged organelles, accompanied by a reduction in mtDNA copy number and suppressed expression of respiratory chain proteins, collectively resulting in diminished oxidative phosphorylation efficiency (Otten et al., 2020; Chaanine et al., 2019). Disease conditions also precipitate a decline in mitochondrial membrane potential, which in turn promotes excessive Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) generation and further destabilizes cellular bioenergetics (Zou et al., 2021). At the same time, mitochondrial cristae become reduced in number and disorganized, changes that markedly impair oxidative phosphorylation and ATP production (Chaanine et al., 2019).
By comparing the effects of high-intensity interval swimming training versus sedentary conditions on myocardial mitochondrial ultrastructure in Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats, we found that, relative to the sedentary group, the exercise group exhibited significantly higher mitochondrial morphological metrics (circularity) and size metrics (mean area and perimeter) (Pasmiño et al., 2024). Transmission electron microscopy further revealed a reduced mitochondrial abundance in the sedentary group, accompanied by prominent structural abnormalities, including disorganized or even disrupted cristae and poorly defined outer membrane boundaries; in contrast, the exercise group showed increased mitochondrial abundance, with cristae arranged in a parallel and orderly manner and a sharply delineated outer membrane outline (Pasmiño et al., 2024).
2.2 Physiological functions of cardiac mitochondria
2.2.1 Mitochondrial respiration
Oxygen consumption in the healthy human heart at rest is markedly higher than in other organs, reflecting its substantial energy demand (Sun et al., 2024). Cardiac energy supply is primarily in the form of ATP (Lopaschuk et al., 2021). However, the heart lacks the capacity to store ATP, energy must be replenished continuously; otherwise, ATP would be depleted within 2–10 s, ultimately leading to impaired cardiac function (Lopaschuk et al., 2021). Thus, the body must generate large amounts of ATP continuously to sustain cardiac contractility and various metabolic processes.
Mitochondria, as the primary site of ATP production, generate approximately 30 kg of ATP per day, with about 90% of the ATP utilized by the heart derived from mitochondria (Wei et al., 2025). A small fraction of cardiac ATP comes from glycolysis, whereas the majority is produced via fatty acid–driven OXPHOS (Sun et al., 2024). Fatty acids, serving as the main mitochondrial substrate for ATP production, are conjugated with coenzyme A to form fatty acyl-CoA within mitochondria. Through β-oxidation, fatty acyl-CoA is converted into acetyl-CoA, reduced flavin adenine dinucleotide (FADH2), and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH). FADH2 and NADH then enter the electron transport chain (ETC) to drive ATP synthesis, while acetyl-CoA enters the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle to generate additional FADH2 and NADH, which further fuel ATP production via the ETC (Liu et al., 2023a).
The ETC, composed of mitochondrial complexes I, II, III, IV, and V, represents the fundamental machinery of OXPHOS (Guan et al., 2022). Complex I, the entry point of the ETC, catalyzes the oxidation of NADH to NAD+ (Vercellino and Sazanov, 2022). Dysfunction of Complex I directly impairs this process by reducing the electron-accepting capacity of its flavin mononucleotide (FMN) cofactor (Protasoni and Zeviani, 2021). Complex II plays a critical role in the TCA cycle by catalyzing the oxidation of succinate to fumarate, thereby enhancing cycle efficiency (Goetzman et al., 2023). Because Complex III constitutes the core of the respiratory chain, its structural and functional integrity is essential for maintaining mitochondrial respiration (Protasoni and Zeviani, 2021). Complex IV biogenesis relies on assembly factors encoded by nuclear DNA as well as structural subunits encoded by mitochondrial DNA. Mutations in critical genes from either source can disrupt proper Complex IV assembly, leading to dysfunction and ultimately to mitochondrial disease (Ghezzi and Zeviani, 2018).
Importantly, these mitochondrial complexes interact to form supercomplexes, which accelerate electron transfer, enhance mitochondrial respiratory efficiency, and simultaneously reduce reactive oxygen species (ROS) production from the ETC, thereby supporting normal cardiac contractile function (Guan et al., 2022).
2.2.2 Mitochondrial dynamics
The integrity of the mitochondrial network is dynamically regulated by mitochondrial dynamics (Chen et al., 2023). This process primarily encompasses the complementary remodeling events of mitochondrial fusion and fission, while mitochondrial biogenesis increases mitochondrial abundance and mitophagy removes damaged organelles (Chen et al., 2023). Collectively, these dynamic processes govern the morphology, number, and quality of cardiac mitochondria (Chen et al., 2023). Dysregulation of mitochondrial dynamics impairs cardiac function and increases susceptibility to cardiovascular diseases, including arrhythmia, coronary artery disease, and heart failure (Hinton et al., 2024).
Mitochondrial fusion refers to the merging of two individual mitochondria into a larger organelle under the mediation of fusion proteins, thereby allowing mixing of their contents (Gao and Hu, 2021). This process involves both outer and inner membrane fusion (Gao and Hu, 2021). Outer membrane fusion is mediated by mitofusin 1 (Mfn1) and mitofusin 2 (Mfn2), and requires both mitochondria to express these proteins, whereas inner membrane fusion is driven by optic atrophy protein 1 (Opa1), which is sufficient on only one of the fusing mitochondria (Gao and Hu, 2021). Opa1 function is dynamically regulated through alternative splicing and proteolytic processing by Oma1 and Yme1L proteases, generating both membrane-anchored long isoforms and soluble short isoforms that coordinate inner membrane fusion in response to cellular conditions (Chan, 2020). Importantly, Yme1L enhances Opa1 cleavage under conditions of elevated OXPHOS, thereby promoting inner membrane fusion (Tokuyama and Yanagi, 2023). Tokuyama reported that loss of fusion proteins leads to mitochondrial fragmentation and impaired cardiac function (Tokuyama and Yanagi, 2023). Thus, mitochondrial fusion is essential for maintaining mitochondrial function and contributes to the healthy development of the mammalian heart.
Mitochondrial fission refers to the division of a single mitochondrion into two independent organelles, thereby redistributing its contents (Adebayo et al., 2021). In mammals, this process is primarily mediated by dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1), a cytosolic GTPase that is specifically recruited to the mitochondrial surface by interacting with outer membrane receptors such as fission mitochondrial 1 protein (Fis1) and mitochondrial fission factor (MFF) (Adebayo et al., 2021). Because Drp1 lacks a mitochondrial targeting sequence, its recruitment is thought to depend on accessory proteins (Jin et al., 2021). Although hFis1 was initially proposed as a candidate receptor—based on the essential role of its yeast homolog Fis1 in promoting fission complex assembly on the mitochondrial outer membrane (Mozdy et al., 2000)—immunocytochemical analyses revealed that RNAi-mediated knockdown of hFis1 does not markedly alter Drp1 mitochondrial localization, suggesting that hFis1 is not indispensable for Drp1 recruitment (Lee et al., 2004). By contrast, Gandre-Babbe et al. demonstrated that MFF depletion suppresses carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP)–induced mitochondrial fission, with a much stronger effect than Fis1 (Gandre-Babbe and van der Bliek, 2008).
In addition to receptor-mediated recruitment, post-translational modifications of Drp1 critically regulate fission activity. For example, calcineurin-dependent dephosphorylation of Drp1 promotes its translocation to mitochondria, thereby facilitating fission (Chen et al., 2023). Functionally, fusion enables exchange of mitochondrial contents, allowing organelles to complement one another under metabolic or environmental stress and maintain optimal activity. Conversely, fission is essential for mitochondrial proliferation and quality control, as it enables selective removal of damaged components. The dynamic balance between these two opposing processes is crucial for sustaining normal mitochondrial function, and dysregulation of either fusion or fission contributes to the pathogenesis of various cardiac diseases (Adebayo et al., 2021).
2.2.3 Mitochondrial calcium homeostasis
Mitochondria serve as a central regulatory hub for intracellular Ca2+ oscillations, largely owing to their high-capacity Ca2+ buffering ability (Hasan et al., 2024). Mitochondrial Ca2+ is now recognized as a pivotal second messenger that governs cardiomyocyte survival and death, and is critically involved in regulating OXPHOS, ROS generation, and mitophagy (Wei et al., 2025). Specialized channels located on the mitochondrial membranes control Ca2+ influx and efflux, thereby maintaining Ca2+ levels within an optimal range. This homeostatic regulation prevents pathological events such as mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) opening and mitochondrial swelling, which would otherwise compromise mitochondrial integrity and impair cardiac function (Xu et al., 2020).
Cytosolic Ca2+ uptake into mitochondria is primarily mediated by the mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU), an inner membrane channel that transports Ca2+ into the mitochondrial matrix (Hasan et al., 2024). Under respiratory conditions, however, when cytosolic Ca2+ exceeds ∼10 μM, the rate of mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake is no longer determined by MCU activity itself but instead limited by the rate at which the respiratory chain generates the proton gradient (Huang and Wilson, 2023). MCU activity is further modulated by a range of inhibitors, including noncompetitive ruthenium compounds and divalent cations that competitively bind to the Ca2+ recognition site (Huang and Wilson, 2023). In addition, certain metal ions can bind to specific MCU sites, altering its conformation and reducing Ca2+ affinity (Huang and Wilson, 2023).
To maintain mitochondrial Ca2+ levels within the physiological range, most matrix Ca2+ is extruded back to the cytosol via the mitochondrial sodium–calcium exchanger (NCX), while a smaller fraction exits through the mPTP. Notably, NCX overexpression enhances Ca2+ efflux from the matrix (Zhang et al., 2022). Beyond Ca2+ extrusion, NCX directly regulates cytosolic and mitochondrial Na+ and Ca2+ concentrations as well as membrane potential, while its own activity is subject to feedback control by these same factors. Moreover, Na+, Ca2+, and membrane potential act through multiple pathways to influence ROS homeostasis (Takeuchi and Matsuoka, 2021).
By taking up Ca2+, mitochondria stimulate OXPHOS and thereby boost ATP production to support cardiac contractility. However, Ca2+ overload induces cardiomyocyte death (Zhang et al., 2022). Thus, precise regulation of mitochondrial Ca2+ homeostasis is indispensable for sustaining cardiac energy metabolism and maintaining normal contractile function.
2.2.4 Mitochondrial oxidative stress
Oxidative stress refers to a state of redox imbalance in which the production of ROS overwhelms the endogenous antioxidant defense systems (Liu et al., 2023b). ROS are generally considered byproducts of aerobic metabolism, and elevated ROS levels are a major driving force in the development of cardiovascular diseases (Liu et al., 2023b). While excessive ROS can impair mitochondrial function and cause cardiomyocyte injury, physiological levels of ROS act as critical signaling molecules that regulate multiple cellular pathways (Atici et al., 2023). Thus, tight regulation of ROS generation is required to ensure that physiological signaling pathways are activated while pathological ones are suppressed (Peoples et al., 2019).
Mitochondria not only represent the primary source of ROS but also harbor antioxidant defense systems that mitigate ROS accumulation (Isei et al., 2021). These include manganese superoxide dismutase, the glutathione peroxidase/reductase system, and the peroxiredoxin/thioredoxin system (Peoples et al., 2019; Isei et al., 2021). Moreover, Schulz et al. reported that hearts lacking mitochondrial uncoupling protein 3 (UCP3), which is located in the inner membrane, produce significantly higher levels of ROS compared with wild-type hearts. This finding suggests that UCP3 functions as a regulator of cardiac oxidative stress, and its overexpression may confer cardioprotective effects (Schulz and Schlüter, 2023).
Taken together, cardiac mitochondria safeguard the heart against oxidative stress–induced injury by tightly balancing ROS production and scavenging.
2.2.5 Mitochondrial inflammatory response
Chronic inflammation promotes excessive ROS production and disrupts mitochondrial networks, thereby damaging the structure and function of cardiac mitochondria. This leads to impaired respiration, Ca2+ dysregulation, apoptosis, and ultimately, compromised cardiac function (Hinton et al., 2024). Mitochondria are now recognized as central hubs of proinflammatory signaling, playing pivotal roles in innate immune responses by engaging antimicrobial, antiviral, anti-infective, and cell injury pathways (Arslan et al., 2011; Andrieux et al., 2021). Upon pathogenic invasion, mitochondria release damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which in turn activate innate immunity. This process not only serves as a crucial component of host defense but is also tightly linked to the pathogenesis of diverse inflammatory diseases (Andrieux et al., 2021).
Importantly, mitochondria provide a critical platform for the activation of the NOD-like receptor thermal protein domain associated protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome (Andrieux et al., 2021). Multiple mechanisms converge to facilitate this process, including the translocation of cardiolipin from the inner to the outer mitochondrial membrane, where it directly interacts with NLRP3, and the role of mitochondrial ROS as key secondary messengers that initiate activation signals (Zong et al., 2024). Once activated, the NLRP3 inflammasome catalyzes the maturation of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and interleukin-18 (IL-18), thereby driving inflammatory responses and inducing pyroptosis (Toldo and Abbate, 2024). Thus, suppression of NLRP3 inflammasome activation is critical for limiting inflammation.
Recent studies have suggested that mitochondrial quality control may be harnessed for anti-inflammatory interventions. For instance, D’Amico et al. demonstrated that urolithin A (UA), a gut microbiota–derived natural metabolite, enhances mitophagy and suppresses proinflammatory cytokine production, thereby exerting anti-inflammatory effects (D'Amico et al., 2021a). These findings indicate that mitophagy may serve as an important mechanism of inflammation resolution. Collectively, mitochondria represent promising therapeutic targets for inflammation control. Strategies that reduce mitochondrial ROS generation, inhibit NLRP3 inflammasome activation, and enhance mitophagy may suppress inflammatory pathways and confer cardio protection.
2.2.6 Effects of sedentary lifestyle on cardiac mitochondrial function
In recent years, growing attention to the health consequences of sedentary behavior has led to an expanding body of evidence indicating that prolonged sedentariness can adversely affect cardiac mitochondrial function.
From the perspective of mitochondrial structural homeostasis, sedentariness may impair mitochondrial function early on by disrupting mitochondrial dynamics and Ca2+ homeostasis. Compared with exercise, sedentary behavior has been reported to significantly reduce MFN1 expression, whereas MFN2, OPA1 and DRP1 levels remain largely unchanged. This pattern suggests a selective suppression of mitochondrial fusion with relatively preserved fission, thereby disturbing the balance between fusion and fission and compromising mitochondrial dynamic homeostasis (No et al., 2020). Sedentariness also perturbs mitochondrial Ca2+ handling. In a rat model, Popoiu and colleagues showed that chronic sedentary conditions markedly attenuated Ca2+ uptake by cardiac mitochondria and reduced the efficiency of Ca2+-dependent control of mitochondrial respiration. Together, these alterations disrupt mitochondrial Ca2+ homeostasis and may contribute to impaired cardiac function (Popoiu et al., 2023). Collectively, such changes are expected to limit mitochondrial renewal and functional recovery, while increasing myocardial vulnerability under metabolic stress.
Functionally, sedentary behavior is characterized by both a reduced capacity for mitochondrial renewal and impaired bioenergetic efficiency. Compared with rats subjected to 8 weeks of swim training, long-term sedentariness increases oxidative stress in cardiac mitochondria and blunts activation of the insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) signaling pathway, with reduced expression of key downstream targets, including protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) and glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β). These changes are accompanied by a diminished capacity for mitochondrial biogenesis in the myocardium (Godoy Coto et al., 2024). In parallel, sedentariness decreases the activities of respiratory chain complexes II and IV, thereby reducing respiratory efficiency and weakening myocardial energy metabolism. As respiratory capacity declines, electron leak and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production are likely to rise, further increasing mitochondrial stress and exacerbating dysfunction (Perera et al., 2025).
Ultimately, structural and functional mitochondrial perturbations tend to converge on oxidative stress and inflammatory signaling. Chronic sedentariness promotes excessive mitochondrial ROS generation in the myocardium, which can activate the NLRP3 inflammasome and stimulate the production and release of pro-inflammatory mediators such as IL-1β. This cascade supports the notion that sedentary behavior can trigger mitochondria-driven inflammatory responses by inducing mitochondrial dysfunction and amplifying oxidative stress, thereby exerting deleterious effects on cardiac function (Ding et al., 2024). Taken together, sedentariness compromises cardiac function through multiple, interconnected mechanisms, including reduced mitochondrial respiratory performance, disruption of mitochondrial dynamics and Ca2+ homeostasis, and heightened mitochondrial oxidative stress and inflammation, culminating in impaired overall cardiac function (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Physiological functions of cardiac mitochondria. The physiological roles of cardiac mitochondria include mitochondrial respiration, dynamics, calcium homeostasis, and resistance to oxidative stress and inflammatory responses. TCA, tricarboxylic acid cycle; I, NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase; II, succinate: ubiquinone oxidoreductase; III, ubiquinol: cytochrome c oxidoreductase; IV, cytochrome c oxidase; V, ATP synthase; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; Mfn1, mitofusin 1; Mfn2, mitofusin 2; Opa1, optic atrophy protein 1; Drp1, dynamin-related protein 1; MCU, mitochondrial calcium uniporter; NCX, sodium–calcium exchanger; ROS, reactive oxygen species; Mn-SOD, manganese superoxide dismutase; Prx/Trx, peroxiredoxin/thioredoxin; GPx/GRd, glutathione peroxidase/reductase; mtDAMPs, mitochondrial damage-associated molecular patterns; NLRP3 inflammasome, NOD-like receptor thermal protein domain–associated protein 3 inflammasome.
3 Mitochondria and cardiac health
A sedentary lifestyle has been identified as a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, largely due to its detrimental effects on mitochondrial function in cardiomyocytes. Sedentary behavior reduces the body’s demand for oxidative metabolism, thereby suppressing mitochondrial biogenesis and leading to decreases in mitochondrial abundance, membrane potential, and oxidative phosphorylation capacity (Waseem et al., 2022). At the same time, sedentary behavior disrupts mitochondrial dynamics, resulting in fragmented mitochondrial networks, diminished respiratory chain activity, and increased ROS production, all of which impair energy supply and exacerbate cardiomyocyte injury (Tocantins et al., 2023). As these mitochondrial defects accumulate, both the structure and function of the myocardium become compromised, markedly elevating the risk of cardiovascular disease.
Regular physical activity plays a pivotal role in reversing the mitochondrial dysfunction in cardiomyocytes induced by prolonged sedentary behavior. Studies show that exercise increases myocardial oxygen demand, thereby enhancing mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and boosting ATP production to meet the energetic needs of the heart (Lopaschuk et al., 2010; Huynh and Pamenter, 2022). In addition, exercise modulates the expression of proteins governing mitochondrial fusion and fission, promoting fusion while limiting excessive fission, which collectively improves mitochondrial structure and function and confers cardioprotective effects (Haghighi et al., 2025). Consequently, regular exercise is essential for restoring cardiac energy metabolism, maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis, and reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease.
In summary, the effects of both sedentary and physically active lifestyles on cardiac health are largely mediated through mitochondrial function. As the central regulators of cardiac energy production, metabolic homeostasis, and cell survival, mitochondria are essential for maintaining normal myocardial performance. Consequently, mitochondrial functional status is closely tied to overall cardiac health.
4 Mitochondrial mechanisms of exercise-induced cardio protection
4.1 The role of mitochondrial respiration in exercise-induced cardio protection
The beneficial role of exercise in enhancing mitochondrial respiration and energy metabolism in the heart has been well documented. Lopaschuk et al. demonstrated that exercise increases myocardial oxygen consumption by 3- to 10-fold compared with the resting state in rats (Lopaschuk et al., 2010). This rise in oxygen consumption results from elevated adenosine diphosphate (ADP) concentrations, which drive mitochondrial OXPHOS and thereby accelerate ATP resynthesis (Huynh and Pamenter, 2022). Evidence has also shown that exercise promotes metabolic remodeling in the heart, particularly by enhancing mitochondrial oxidative metabolism to meet the increased energy demands during physical activity (Gibb and Hill, 2018). Burelle et al. provided additional evidence showing that treadmill-trained rats exhibit higher rates of glucose and palmitate oxidation compared with sedentary controls. This metabolic enhancement led to greater ATP production, which was associated with cardioprotective effects (Burelle et al., 2004). In another study, Suvorava et al. showed that exercise upregulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) in erythrocytes, the rate-limiting enzyme for nitric oxide (NO) synthesis. Increased NO production, in turn, enhanced mitochondrial respiration and contributed to cardioprotection (Suvorava and Cortese-Krott, 2018). Moreover, exercise training has been shown to upregulate cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4 (COX4) and nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase (NAMPT), while activating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and mitochondrial complex V. Together, these adaptations strengthen mitochondrial respiration, elevate myocardial energy levels, promote OXPHOS, and reduce the accumulation of harmful metabolic byproducts, thereby preserving cardiac function (Liang et al., 2024). In addition, a study on voluntary exercise training in high-fat diet-fed mice demonstrated that exercise significantly enhanced the activity of mitochondrial complex I, thereby improving the overall function of the electron transport chain and increasing oxidative phosphorylation efficiency. Furthermore, exercise increased the cardiac levels of cardiolipin, a critical lipid for maintaining efficient mitochondrial respiration, which further enhanced mitochondrial respiration capacity and ultimately improved cardiac function in obese mice (Perera et al., 2025). A growing body of research indicates that different types of exercise can induce specific and diverse adaptations in mitochondria. Specifically, training volume appears to be a key factor influencing mitochondrial content, while exercise intensity is a critical determinant of changes in mitochondrial respiration (Granata et al., 2018). One study examined the effects of repeated low-intensity (20 Hz) and high-intensity (100 Hz) stimulation on mitochondrial content and function. The study found that while mitochondrial content, as measured by citrate synthase activity, increased under both 20 Hz and 100 Hz stimulation, only the 100 Hz stimulation led to an increase in mitochondrial respiratory function, the content of respiratory chain complexes, and the assembly of mitochondrial supercomplexes (Yamada et al., 2021). Another human trial demonstrated that a 4-week sprint interval training (SIT) program increased mitochondrial respiration in muscle fibers by 25%, whereas no changes were observed with aerobic training (Granata et al., 2016). These results suggest that exercise can induce mitochondrial respiratory adaptations, with exercise intensity potentially being one of the key factors driving these changes. Additionally, Li et al. found that exhaustive exercise leads to a reduction in the activity of mitochondrial complexes I, II, and IV, thereby impairing the normal function of the electron transport chain and reducing oxidative phosphorylation efficiency. This process significantly weakens myocardial mitochondrial respiratory function, ultimately affecting cardiac energy metabolism (Li et al., 2022).
Collectively, these findings indicate that exercise training improves myocardial oxygen consumption, promotes metabolic remodeling, and upregulates energy metabolism–related enzymes, ultimately enhancing mitochondrial respiratory function and conferring cardioprotection.
4.2 The role of mitochondrial dynamics in exercise-induced cardio protection
Exercise has long been recognized as an effective strategy to prevent physical inactivity–induced cardiovascular disease, and accumulating evidence supports its regulatory effects on cardiac mitochondrial dynamics (Viloria et al., 2022; Haghighi et al., 2025). Studies have shown that exercise promotes mitochondrial fusion while inhibiting excessive fission, thereby maintaining elongated mitochondrial networks (Campos et al., 2023). This structural adaptation prevents mitochondrial fragmentation–induced oxidative stress, ATP synthesis impairment, and apoptosis, ultimately enhancing the metabolic capacity and adaptability of cardiac mitochondria under physiological stress conditions (Campos et al., 2023; Disatnik et al., 2013; Duan et al., 2021).
In an 8-week animal study, Haghighi et al. demonstrated that both aerobic and resistance training regulate the gene expression of key markers of mitochondrial fission and fusion. Specifically, the expression of Mfn1, Mfn2, and Opa1 was significantly increased, while Drp1 expression was reduced, indicating that exercise favors fusion over fission to ameliorate sedentary-induced mitochondrial dynamics imbalance (Haghighi et al., 2025; Hernandez-Resendiz et al., 2023). An additional 8-week animal study demonstrated that swimming training ameliorates mitochondrial dynamic abnormalities in rats with pressure overload–induced left ventricular dysfunction. Specifically, exercise increased the expression of mitochondrial fusion markers while reducing the levels of fission markers, thereby restoring mitochondrial dynamic balance and ultimately mitigating myocardial injury (Ma et al., 2025b). Similarly, Jiang et al. reported that aerobic interval training elevated the expression of Mfn2 and Opa1 while decreasing Drp1 protein levels in rat myocardium, thereby improving mitochondrial function and conferring cardioprotection. Mechanistically, this effect was linked to suppression of the ERK1/2–JNK–p53 signaling pathway and upregulation of peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC-1α) (Jiang et al., 2014).
Furthermore, myokine irisin, induced by exercise, has been shown to activate the AMPK–Nrf2 signaling axis, markedly increasing the transcription and translation of mitochondrial fusion–related genes. This promotes mitochondrial fusion, optimizes the balance of mitochondrial dynamics, and enhances mitochondrial function (Zhuo et al., 2023). Conversely, He et al. proposed that aerobic exercise may trigger mitochondrial fission and mitophagy through an FNDC5/irisin-dependent pathway. This selective clearance of damaged mitochondria improves mitochondrial quality control and cardiac function, although fusion protein levels remained unchanged in this context (He et al., 2021). The discrepancy between this study and the aforementioned findings may arise from differences in experimental focus and outcome measures rather than from conflicting biological effects. Specifically, the former emphasized mitochondrial quality control and the selective clearance of damaged mitochondria, whereas the latter primarily assessed the expression of mitochondrial fusion and fission markers and the maintenance of mitochondrial network integrity. Therefore, in models of cardiac injury, exercise may restore dynamic balance by promoting mitochondrial fusion. In contrast, in other models, the activation of fission and autophagy may be the key mechanisms for maintaining heart health and eliminating damaged mitochondria. Xiong et al. found that exhaustive exercise promotes mitochondrial fission by downregulating Mfn2 and upregulating Drp1, without significantly affecting the expression of Mfn1 and Opa1. This process significantly reduces the number of myocardial mitochondria, disrupts mitochondrial energy metabolism, and ultimately leads to myocardial injury (Xiong et al., 2022).
Exercise type and intensity are key factors in regulating myocardial mitochondrial fusion and fission processes. Studies have shown that long-term aerobic exercise promotes myocardial mitochondrial fusion and inhibits excessive fission (Fajardo et al., 2022). In contrast, a single bout of moderate-intensity acute exercise does not induce significant changes in left ventricular mitochondrial dynamics-related proteins (Yoo et al., 2019), suggesting that short-term exercise interventions may not be sufficient to trigger adaptive changes in mitochondrial morphology. Further comparisons of different exercise modalities revealed that 8 weeks of moderate-intensity interval training (60%–65% Vmax), high-intensity interval training (80%–85% Vmax), and resistance training all promoted myocardial mitochondrial fusion and inhibited pathological fission, thereby maintaining mitochondrial dynamics homeostasis, improving myocardial energy metabolism, and enhancing stress tolerance, collectively contributing to cardioprotection (Haghighi et al., 2025). However, the study also pointed out that, compared to moderate-intensity interval training, high-intensity interval training more significantly upregulated fusion-related protein expression and inhibited fission-related proteins. Although resistance training also positively influences mitochondrial dynamics, its effect was not as pronounced as that of high-intensity interval training. These results suggest that exercise intensity may be a more critical factor than exercise type in improving myocardial mitochondrial dynamics, with high-intensity interval training potentially being more effective in regulating myocardial mitochondrial dynamics.
Taken together, these findings suggest that exercise exerts cardioprotective effects by fine-tuning the balance between mitochondrial fusion and fission. However, the precise molecular mechanisms remain incompletely understood, and further research is needed to identify the exact targets and signaling pathways through which exercise regulates mitochondrial dynamics.
4.3 Mitochondrial calcium homeostasis in exercise-induced cardio protection
Exercise, as an easily applicable cardioprotective strategy with minimal adverse effects, plays a pivotal role in regulating Ca2+ homeostasis between the cytosol and mitochondria, thereby alleviating exercise deficiency–induced Ca2+ dysregulation and promoting cardiac health (Wei et al., 2025). Importantly, given the dynamic balance between cytosolic and mitochondrial Ca2+, exercise modulates the expression of key Ca2+-handling proteins, thereby regulating cytosolic Ca2+ homeostasis and indirectly contributing to the physiological control of mitochondrial Ca2+ concentrations (Wei et al., 2025).
Endurance exercise has been shown to enhance myocardial Ca2+ handling capacity in rats with heart failure induced by aortic constriction by upregulating sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase 2a (SERCA2a) and the sodium–calcium exchanger (NCX), thus improving Ca2+ homeostasis and exerting cardioprotective effects (da Silva et al., 2023). Starnes et al. further reported that exercise augments mitochondrial ATP production, which provides sufficient energy for SERCA2a and plasma membrane Ca2+ pumps to facilitate Ca2+ reuptake, while activation of Na+/K+-ATPase reduces the reverse driving force of NCX (Starnes and Taylor, 2007). Together, these adaptations attenuate Ca2+ overload and preserve cardiomyocyte Ca2+ homeostasis.
Exercise has also been found to stabilize mitochondrial Ca2+ levels, preventing Ca2+ overload and reducing the risk of mPTP opening (Marcil et al., 2006). This protective effect is associated with favorable alterations in the ratio of apoptosis-related proteins such as B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) and Bcl-2–associated X protein (Bax), and appears to be substrate-dependent, being most evident when succinate serves as the metabolic substrate (Kwak et al., 2006). Kemi et al. demonstrated that exercise enhances myofilament sensitivity to Ca2+, thereby improving contractile function and contributing to cardioprotection (Kemi et al., 2004). Additionally, exercise reduces calpain activation and protein carbonylation, thereby limiting the degradation of Ca2+-handling proteins, maintaining Ca2+ homeostasis, and protecting the myocardium (French et al., 2008; French et al., 2006). Additionally, in the regulation of mitochondrial calcium homeostasis, exhaustive exercise and endurance exercise exhibit distinct effects. Exhaustive exercise leads to an increase in total mitochondrial Ca2+ content, causing calcium overload, which in turn induces the opening of the mPTP, promoting the release of free Ca2+ from the mitochondrial matrix and decreasing its concentration, ultimately impairing myocardial energy supply (Saris et al., 1993). In contrast, long-term endurance exercise upregulates the expression of SERCA2a and NCX, preventing mitochondrial calcium overload and mPTP opening, thereby helping to maintain myocardial mitochondrial calcium homeostasis (da Silva et al., 2023). Furthermore, after acute endurance exercise, the myocardial mitochondria’s ability to retain Ca2+ is enhanced (Yoo et al., 2019).
Collectively, these findings highlight that maintaining mitochondrial Ca2+ homeostasis is essential for sustaining and promoting cardiac health.
4.4 Mitochondrial oxidative stress in exercise-induced cardio protection
A substantial body of evidence indicates that exercise effectively regulates mitochondrial ROS generation and clearance, with several molecular mechanisms being implicated (Wei et al., 2025). Traditionally, the reduction in ROS levels has been attributed to two major mechanisms: i. enhanced activity of endogenous antioxidant enzyme systems, and ii. reduced production of ROS precursors such as superoxide (Farhat et al., 2015). Starnes et al. reported that long-term endurance training improved the antioxidant defense system in sedentary rats, leading to a 49% increase in catalase activity and ultimately conferring cardioprotection. Interestingly, catalase activity remained relatively low compared with other antioxidant enzymes, and no significant changes were observed in mitochondrial glutathione peroxidase or superoxide dismutase activities (Starnes et al., 2007). These findings suggest that the ROS-lowering effect of exercise may be more closely related to reduced superoxide production than to increased antioxidant enzyme activity.
In contrast, Tocantins et al. demonstrated that exercise promotes mitochondrial ROS–mediated activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway, which upregulates downstream antioxidant enzymes and strengthens cardiac antioxidant capacity. Notably, this effect persisted for up to 8 weeks after cessation of training (Tocantins et al., 2023). The opposing viewpoints may arise from differences in the experimental models used in the two studies. Moreover, variations in training protocols may substantially influence the final outcomes, thereby leading to inconsistencies in the reported results. The divergent findings of these two studies highlight distinct mechanisms by which exercise regulates myocardial oxidative stress. In the former, exercise attenuates oxidative stress primarily by reducing ROS production, whereas in the latter, exercise increases ROS generation to activate the Nrf2 signaling pathway, thereby upregulating antioxidant enzyme expression and enhancing the heart’s antioxidant capacity. Exercise has also been shown to increase α-ketoglutarate levels, thereby suppressing atrial natriuretic peptide upregulation, reducing ROS generation and oxidative stress, and ultimately mediating cardioprotection (An et al., 2021). Moreover, complex I of the mitochondrial electron transport chain, a major site of ROS production, undergoes functional remodeling in response to endurance training (Okoye et al., 2023). Such specific adaptations effectively suppress myocardial mitochondrial ROS production, enhance antioxidant defenses, and improve cardiac performance (Farhat et al., 2015). Studies have also shown that aerobic exercise in diabetic mice activates an Akt-dependent signaling pathway, thereby suppressing the activity of mammalian Ste20-like kinase 1 (Mst1). Downregulation of Mst1 reduces mitochondrial ROS production and ultimately alleviates oxidative stress in the myocardium (Zhao et al., 2020). Notably, exercise intensity plays a pivotal role in regulating mitochondrial redox homeostasis. Evidence indicates that when rats undergo exhaustive exercise, excessive ROS are generated, accompanied by a marked decline in the activity of endogenous antioxidant enzymes. This imbalance compromises mitochondrial antioxidant defenses, leading to heightened oxidative stress and, ultimately, structural and functional injury to myocardial tissue (Yang et al., 2022).
Existing studies have shown that different forms of exercise have varying effects on myocardial oxidative stress regulation. Sabouri et al. reported that a 12-week exercise intervention for type 2 diabetes demonstrated that high-intensity interval training (HIIT), resistance training (ST), and their combined regimen all enhanced myocardial antioxidant defense capacity, as evidenced by increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activities, as well as overall antioxidant capacity. Further comparisons revealed that HIIT and combined training were significantly more effective in improving the body’s redox balance than resistance training alone (Sabouri et al., 2021). In a myocardial infarction model, both HIIT and aerobic exercise increased GPx and SOD activities, alleviated oxidative stress, but HIIT was more effective in enhancing GPx activity and reducing oxidative stress (Lu et al., 2015). Another study pointed out that both aerobic and resistance exercise can improve myocardial oxidative stress, but there was no significant difference between the two (Rodrigues et al., 2023). However, exercise has a bidirectional effect, and seven consecutive days of high-intensity exercise can lead to myocardial damage, accompanied by a decrease in mitochondrial antioxidant enzyme activity, suggesting that overtraining may have a detrimental effect on the myocardial antioxidant system (Gao et al., 2014). In conclusion, the existing evidence suggests that HIIT may have a greater advantage in improving myocardial mitochondrial redox imbalance.
Collectively, these studies highlight that exercise alleviates mitochondrial oxidative stress by reducing ROS production and/or enhancing ROS clearance, thereby preventing or attenuating oxidative myocardial injury.
4.5 Mitochondrial inflammatory response in exercise-induced cardio protection
Multiple studies have demonstrated that exercise exerts mitochondria-mediated anti-inflammatory effects, thereby alleviating chronic inflammation–induced myocardial injury associated with physical inactivity and contributing to the maintenance and improvement of normal cardiac function. Yuan et al. reported that exercise preserves normal sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release in cardiomyocytes, which safeguards mitochondrial Ca2+ homeostasis and mitigates oxidative stress. This adaptation prevents excessive ROS accumulation and suppresses activation of the nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) pathway, ultimately reducing chronic inflammation and protecting the heart from damage (Yuan et al., 2025a).
Similarly, other studies have identified the NLRP3 inflammasome, localized at the mitochondria–endoplasmic reticulum membrane interface, as a critical target of exercise-induced cardioprotection (Lv et al., 2022). Exercise inhibits activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by suppressing the upstream TXNIP/TRX/NF-κB signaling pathway. As a result, levels of pro-inflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) are markedly reduced, thereby alleviating mitochondrial inflammation and preserving cardiac function (Meng, 2017; Li et al., 2020).
Furthermore, exercise has been shown to activate the sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) signaling pathway, which enhances mitochondrial complex I activity, reduces electron leakage, and diminishes ROS production. This subsequently suppresses NF-κB–mediated inflammatory signaling and lowers pro-inflammatory cytokine expression, thereby attenuating myocardial inflammation induced by physical inactivity (Chen et al., 2018; Tuon et al., 2015). However, the cardioprotective effects of exercise are not limited to healthy individuals. Zhang et al. showed that, in an isoproterenol-induced model of cardiac inflammation, exercise suppresses the ROS–NLRP3 inflammasome signaling axis, thereby markedly attenuating myocardial inflammation, and this protective effect occurs independently of AMPK signaling (Zhang et al., 2023). Additionally, excessive or intense exercise significantly induces the production of pro-inflammatory factors such as TNF-α and IL-6, triggering a systemic inflammatory response. Importantly, this inflammatory response exacerbates mitochondrial ROS generation, further impairing mitochondrial function and creating a vicious cycle, ultimately leading to adverse effects on myocardial health (Bernecker et al., 2013).
At present, comparative studies investigating the effects of different exercise modalities on myocardial inflammatory responses remain limited. Research comparing the impact of swimming training, resistance training, and HIIT on diabetic cardiomyopathy has shown that all three exercise types reduce the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-6, TNF-α, and NF-κB) and alleviate inflammation, with HIIT exhibiting the most pronounced improvement (Ma et al., 2025a). Similarly, in aged mouse models, both HIIT and moderate-intensity aerobic training exerted anti-inflammatory effects; however, HIIT was more effective in improving mitochondrial morphology and maintaining mitochondrial homeostasis, thereby more efficiently mitigating myocardial inflammation (Li et al., 2025b). In contrast, acute vigorous exercise can elicit several adverse responses, including inflammation. Li et al. demonstrated that acute exercise in rats increased myocardial mitochondrial ROS production, which in turn activated the NLRP3 inflammasome and triggered myocardial inflammation (Li et al., 2016). Collectively, these findings suggest that long-term exercise—particularly HIIT—can attenuate inflammatory responses by downregulating the expression of myocardial pro-inflammatory factors, whereas strenuous exercise tends to induce inflammation through the ROS/NLRP3 signaling pathway.
In summary, exercise optimizes mitochondrial function to downregulate chronic low-grade inflammation, thereby counteracting the risk of myocardial injury associated with sedentary behavior (Figure 2; Tables 1, 2).
Figure 2. Mitochondrial mechanisms underlying exercise-induced cardioprotection. Exercise enhances cardiac protection by improving mitochondrial respiratory function, dynamics, and Ca2+ homeostasis, while reducing oxidative stress and inflammation. ATP, adenosine triphosphate; COX4, cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; NAMPT, nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase; Mfn1, mitofusin 1; Mfn2, mitofusin 2; Opa1, optic atrophy protein 1; Drp1, dynamin-related protein 1; NCX, sodium–calcium exchanger; SERCA2a, sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase 2a; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, catalase; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; IL-6, interleukin-6; CRP, C-reactive protein; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; NLRP3 inflammasome, NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain–containing 3 inflammasome.
Table 2. Summary of main characteristics of myocardial mitochondria under sedentary versus exercise conditions.
5 Multilevel protective mechanisms underlying exercise-induced remodeling of cardiac mitochondrial function
Mitochondria are central to the cardioprotective effects of exercise, and their functional remodeling is driven by a series of dynamic, coordinated molecular adaptations. Accumulating evidence indicates that exercise not only regulates mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number and heteroplasmy and preserves mitochondrial proteostasis, but also reshapes mitochondrial metabolic networks and integrates bidirectional nucleus–mitochondrion signaling at both genetic and epigenetic levels. Together, these multilevel and highly coordinated adaptations promote structural and functional optimization of cardiac mitochondria, thereby establishing a molecular basis for exercise-induced cardioprotection.
5.1 mtDNA copy number and heteroplasmy
Studies have shown that aerobic exercise can increase mtDNA copy number, a change that is often regarded as a molecular hallmark of enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis (Jeppesen, 2020). However, knee-extensor training in healthy individuals did not produce a significant change in mtDNA copy number in the trained limb, suggesting that exercise-induced regulation of mtDNA copy number may depend on the exercise modality (Fritzen et al., 2019). Importantly, exercise influences the mitochondrial genome not only by altering mtDNA copy number, but also through dynamic regulation of mtDNA heteroplasmy and mutation burden. The relative proportion of wild-type versus mutant mtDNA copies determines tissue-level mutation load and is strongly inversely associated with mitochondrial oxidative capacity. Aerobic exercise has been reported to markedly improve oxidative capacity in patients with mtDNA mutations, thereby reducing mutation burden and mtDNA heteroplasmy and alleviating mitochondrial dysfunction driven by elevated heteroplasmy (Jeppesen, 2020).
5.2 Mitochondrial proteostasis
Mitochondrial proteostasis depends on endogenous chaperones and proteolytic systems to preserve structural and functional integrity, and exercise is considered an important physiological stimulus that activates this regulatory network (Chen et al., 2021). Evidence suggests that mitochondrial lon peptidase 1 (LONP1) is a key determinant of mitochondrial proteostasis in the heart. Exercise upregulates LONP1 expression, thereby enhancing its capacity to recognize and degrade oxidatively damaged proteins (Zanini et al., 2023). In parallel, LONP1 cooperates with the mitochondrial heat shock protein 70 (mtHSP70) chaperone system to facilitate proper folding of nascent or damaged proteins, further strengthening mitochondrial protein quality control and functional homeostasis (Shin et al., 2021).
Fan et al. using proteomic analyses of a cardiomyocyte-specific heat shock protein 60 (HSP60) knockout mouse model, reported that loss of HSP60 reduces global mitochondrial protein abundance by ∼20% and triggers early activation of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response (Fan et al., 2020). By contrast, exercise interventions have been shown to increase HSP60 expression, which may partially mitigate mitochondrial protein abnormalities and help maintain mitochondrial proteostasis (D'Amico et al., 2021b). Collectively, these findings support the view that exercise remodels mitochondrial proteostasis at the molecular level by modulating mitochondrial chaperone and protease systems, thereby serving as a key regulatory node in exercise-induced mitochondrial adaptation.
5.3 Bidirectional nucleus–mitochondrion signaling
In the heart, exercise activates multilayered molecular regulatory networks that reshape gene expression programs and promote adaptive remodeling of cardiac structure and function. Exercise-induced changes in hemodynamic load and metabolic state engage multiple signaling pathways in cardiomyocytes and coordinate transcription factors such as PGC-1α, MEF2, and NRF2 with epigenetic regulators, thereby driving beneficial adaptations in cardiac structure and performance (Jia et al., 2019). Beyond canonical transcriptional control, exercise can also reprogram the cardiac transcriptome by reshaping non-coding RNA (ncRNA) networks, conferring cardioprotective effects (Yuan et al., 2025b). In particular, sustained training markedly remodels the expression landscape of cardiac microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which act as critical post-transcriptional and/or epigenetic modulators to fine-tune gene regulatory programs in cardiomyocytes (Yuan et al., 2025b). For example, Fathi et al. reported that 14 weeks of aerobic exercise significantly upregulated myocardial miR-1 and miR-133, enhancing the transcriptional activity of growth-associated genes and ultimately promoting a physiological hypertrophy phenotype (Fathi et al., 2020). Chang et al. further showed that exercise facilitates a specific interaction between the lncRNA Mhrt and the chromatin remodeling factor Brg1, which is implicated in pathological hypertrophy; this interaction reduces Brg1 occupancy at promoters of pro-hypertrophic genes, dampens hypertrophy-related transcriptional activation, and helps prevent maladaptive cardiac remodeling (Chang and Han, 2016). Moreover, exercise-induced cardiac reprogramming is not confined to transcriptional changes but is accompanied by broader epigenetic remodeling, including alterations in DNA methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin accessibility. These epigenetic adaptations further modulate processes central to cardiac remodeling, inflammation, and oxidative stress, collectively reinforcing exercise-driven improvements in cardiac structure and function (Ghavami et al., 2022; Shi et al., 2022). Overall, exercise-induced gene-expression reprogramming plays a pivotal role in enhancing physiological cardiac performance and increasing resistance to pathological insults.
At the genetic and epigenetic levels, exercise promotes adaptive remodeling of mitochondrial function by coordinating expression programs encoded by the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. This process relies primarily on two complementary modes of intracellular communication: anterograde and retrograde signaling (Silver et al., 2025). Anterograde signaling originates in the nucleus and acts on mitochondria by regulating transcriptional and post-transcriptional processes of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes, thereby shaping mitochondrial function. Retrograde signaling, in contrast, originates from mitochondria and feeds back to the nucleus and other organelles, converting mitochondrial energetic and stress cues into transcriptional reprogramming that preserves inter-organelle homeostasis (Darfarin and Pluth, 2025).
Within the anterograde pathway, exercise activates a PGC-1α–centered transcriptional network to drive expression of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes. This program further modulates the activity of nuclear respiratory factor 1 (NRF1) and TFAM, thereby promoting mtDNA transcription and replication and ultimately enhancing mitochondrial capacity and adaptability (Memme and Hood, 2020; Scarpulla, 2011). In the retrograde pathway, ROS generated during mitochondrial energy production serve as key signaling mediators that engage redox-sensitive regulators such as nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2 (NRF2), which in turn induces nuclear antioxidant gene programs. This feedback loop supports cellular resilience to oxidative stress and helps maintain metabolic homeostasis (Kasai et al., 2020).
In addition, the mitochondria-derived peptide MOTS-c represents an important retrograde signaling effector. Under stress conditions such as exercise, MOTS-c can translocate to the nucleus via an AMPK-dependent mechanism and bind regulatory regions enriched for antioxidant response elements (AREs), including promoters of NRF2 target genes. Through this mechanism, MOTS-c enhances transcription of NRF2-responsive genes, rewires metabolic programs, and strengthens antioxidant defenses (Kim et al., 2018; Ma, 2013; Wan et al., 2023).
5.4 Mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming
A substantial body of evidence indicates that regular exercise induces metabolic reprogramming of cardiac mitochondria, enabling the heart to meet energetic demands imposed by different exercise modalities. For example, swim training markedly increases the activity of electron transport chain–related enzymes and citrate synthase in the mouse heart, thereby enhancing oxidative phosphorylation capacity and supporting a more efficient and adequate energy supply during exercise (Fulghum and Hill, 2018). In an ex vivo study using perfused mouse hearts, moderate exercise training was shown to augment both mitochondrial glucose oxidation and fatty acid oxidation in the myocardium, improving mitochondrial metabolic function and strengthening metabolic flexibility and cardioprotection (Riehle et al., 2014).
Notably, exercise intensity appears to differentially shape cardiac mitochondrial metabolic remodeling. Hafstad et al. reported that in C57BL/6J mice subjected to 10 weeks of treadmill training, a high-intensity interval protocol elicited greater improvements in myocardial mitochondrial metabolic capacity than a moderate-intensity continuous protocol. Specifically, high-intensity interval training increased glucose oxidation, reduced palmitate oxidation, and elevated myocardial citrate synthase activity, whereas the moderate-intensity protocol did not significantly alter glucose oxidation, palmitate oxidation, or citrate synthase activity (Hafstad et al., 2011). Collectively, these findings underscore exercise intensity as a key determinant of mitochondrial metabolic adaptation and suggest that high-intensity interval treadmill training may be particularly effective in driving cardiac mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming.
5.5 Energetic polarity
Energetic polarity refers to the spatial compartmentalization of mitochondrial energy metabolism within distinct intracellular regions, particularly in high-demand tissues such as the heart and skeletal muscle. This concept has emerged as an important theme in mitochondrial quality control research. Current evidence suggests that, under acute exercise, changes in mitochondrial quality control may arise from locally regulated mechanisms operating within different subdomains of the mitochondrial network. The underlying link is that mitochondrial quality control is tightly coupled to mitochondrial bioenergetics; thus, local fluctuations in energy availability likely help determine where quality control processes are initiated within the cell (Drake and Yan, 2019). For example, in the heart, mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake and release are subject to fine spatial regulation to optimize the energetic efficiency of calcium signaling (De La Fuente et al., 2018). Moreover, under energetic stress conditions such as exercise, selective mitophagy can be observed in subsets of mitochondria within the network, further supporting the spatial specificity of mitochondrial quality control (Laker et al., 2017).
Notably, the mechanisms that establish this spatial specificity remain incompletely understood. Recent work by Drake and colleagues offers a potential explanation (Drake et al., 2021). They reported that AMPK subunits can localize to the outer mitochondrial membrane in cardiac and skeletal muscle, forming a pool termed mitochondrial AMPK (mitoAMPK). Under energetic stress, AMPK activation displays pronounced spatial heterogeneity. Specifically, following electrical stimulation–induced contraction of skeletal muscle fibers, mitoAMPK activity is not uniform across the cell but instead increases markedly within discrete mitochondrial regions (Drake et al., 2021). Collectively, these findings suggest that when cells experience elevated energetic demand or stress (e.g., during exercise), the mitochondrial energy stress response is not distributed evenly throughout the cell, but is instead concentrated within specific local subcellular domains.
5.6 Systems genetics and multi-omics integration
Extensive work has characterized the dynamic physiological responses of multiple organs during exercise (e.g., the heart, skeletal muscle, and liver). However, the biological mechanisms by which exercise promotes health—and the underlying molecular networks—are highly complex and remain incompletely defined. Mitochondria can adapt to cell- and tissue-specific metabolic demands through processes that involve nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes, mtDNA heteroplasmy, and metabolite-driven energy transduction (Kappler et al., 2019). Notably, across variations in exercise intensity and duration, the transition from mitochondrial stress responses to long-term adaptation is particularly intricate, and no single pathway is sufficient to fully explain these effects.
Multi-omics approaches are increasingly helping to close this knowledge gap by systematically mapping the molecular networks that mediate exercise’s health benefits. A representative effort is the Molecular Transducers of Physical Activity Consortium (MoTrPAC), which aims to build a cross-tissue, multi-omics atlas of exercise training responses (Sanford et al., 2020). Recently, MoTrPAC generated a mitochondrial multi-omics landscape across 19 distinct tissues under aerobic exercise conditions, highlighting in particular that aerobic exercise alters acetylation-related modifications of cardiac mitochondrial proteins (Amar et al., 2024). Although prior studies support the notion that exercise improves mitochondrial content and function, mitochondria-specific multi-omics signatures across different exercise modalities, intensities, and training durations remain to be more comprehensively delineated (Yan et al., 2012; Santos-Alves et al., 2015).
Beyond delineating the biological changes and mechanisms elicited by exercise, it is equally important to understand why the benefits of regular physical activity vary substantially across individuals. As early as four decades ago, researchers documented marked inter-individual variability in training responsiveness: in a 20-week aerobic training program, participants exhibited wide differences in the improvement of VO2max, suggesting that certain genetic factors may confer greater sensitivity to training stimuli (Lortie et al., 1984). By extension, exercise-induced mitochondrial adaptations are also likely shaped by genetic background, with candidate regulators including tumor protein p53 (TP53) and N-acetyltransferase 1 (Nat1). TP53, encoded by the human TP53 gene, is required for normal mitochondrial respiration and mtDNA integrity; its loss impairs these processes and reduces aerobic exercise capacity (Park et al., 2009). Similarly, Nat1-deficient mice display significant reductions in basal metabolic rate and exercise performance (Chennamsetty et al., 2016). Genome-wide approaches can further resolve an individual’s genetic architecture and may even identify rare variants that exert beneficial or detrimental effects on exercise responsiveness (Bouchard et al., 2015).
In summary, individual-level multi-omics profiling can integrate exercise state–dependent molecular changes with genetic information. By accounting for a person’s specific responses to different exercise modalities and intensities, these approaches provide a mechanistic foundation for developing targeted, personalized exercise prescriptions.
6 Roles of non-myocyte cardiac cells in exercise-induced cardioprotection
6.1 Fibroblasts
Exercise has been clearly shown to confer cardioprotection in part by regulating the physiological functions of cardiac fibroblasts. Fu et al. reported that regular exercise promotes the release of exosomes derived from endothelial progenitor cells, thereby increasing miR-126 expression. This, in turn, suppresses activation of the TGF-β/Smad3 signaling pathway, slows fibroblast transdifferentiation, and markedly attenuates myocardial fibrosis, ultimately protecting the heart (Fu et al., 2024).
In addition, other studies have found that exercise upregulates fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) expression and inhibits activation of the TGF-β1–Smad2/3–MMP2/9 signaling axis, thereby reducing collagen production. This mechanism effectively alleviates myocardial fibrosis in mouse models of myocardial infarction and improves cardiac function (Ma et al., 2021). Collectively, these findings indicate that exercise protects the myocardium from injury by improving fibroblast physiology and suppressing fibroblast-driven fibrosis and collagen deposition.
6.2 Endothelial cells
Multiple lines of evidence indicate that cardiac endothelial cells serve as key mediators of exercise-induced cardioprotection, a process that engages diverse molecular signaling pathways and regulatory mechanisms. Bernardo et al. demonstrated that exercise stimulates cardiac endothelial cells to produce substantial amounts of nitric oxide (NO). This gaseous signaling molecule helps preserve cellular energy homeostasis by modulating mitochondrial respiration, thereby optimizing endothelial function, reducing cardiac stress, and ultimately promoting cardioprotection (Bernardo et al., 2018).
Studies also show that exercise markedly lowers systemic inflammation by downregulating inflammatory markers such as TNF-α and IL-6, which in turn helps prevent inflammation-driven endothelial dysfunction in the heart. This anti-inflammatory effect is important for maintaining cardiac health and reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease (Isaksen et al., 2019). Taken together, these findings underscore that preserving normal cardiac endothelial cell function is essential for sustaining overall cardiac performance.
6.3 Immune cells
Immune cells are not only a primary line of defense against invading pathogens but also play pivotal roles in maintaining cardiac homeostasis and orchestrating stress responses (Rurik et al., 2021). Bai et al. found that downhill running training increases the abundance of T cells, NK cells, and M2 macrophages in myocardial tissue, thereby shaping an anti-inflammatory, pro-reparative immune microenvironment. This milieu promotes repair and regenerative processes in injured myocardium, reduces myocardial fibrosis, and ultimately confers cardioprotection (Bai et al., 2025).
In addition, Wang et al. reported that running training upregulates the inhibitory receptor FcγRIIB on the surface of B cells. By raising the activation threshold of B cells, this mechanism suppresses cardiac inflammation and antibody-mediated tissue injury, thereby significantly attenuating doxorubicin (Dox)-induced cardiotoxicity (Wang et al., 2024). Collectively, these findings suggest that immune cells help preserve myocardial homeostasis—and support cardiac health—by remodeling the cardiac immune microenvironment and restraining excessive inflammatory responses.
7 Limitation
The current research still faces several limitations. Most studies investigating the mitochondrial mechanisms of exercise-induced cardioprotection remain at the basic experimental level, with relatively few and insufficiently in-depth clinical studies in humans. Although animal studies consistently demonstrate that exercise markedly improves mitochondrial function, the magnitude and temporal dynamics of these adaptations in humans often differ and are modulated by factors such as age, training status, and disease background. Therefore, caution is warranted when extrapolating findings from animal models directly to human exercise physiology. While preclinical studies provide important mechanistic insights, human responses to exercise are shaped by greater physiological complexity, inter-individual variability, and environmental factors. Future work should prioritize high-quality intervention trials in diverse populations to facilitate the translation of experimental findings into practical applications. In addition, although extensive evidence supports the beneficial effects of exercise on cardiac function, considerable heterogeneity exists in the exercise interventions employed across studies, and a unified standard is lacking. Moving forward, greater efforts are needed to establish both standardized and personalized exercise prescriptions, systematically optimizing training protocols to maximize the cardioprotective benefits of different exercise modalities in the general population. In addition, current studies have paid limited attention to emerging layers of mitochondrial regulation—such as the influence of age and sex on mitochondria-mediated exercise-induced cardioprotection, as well as epigenetic modifications, long non-coding RNAs, microRNAs, and acetylation-mediated control—and the key signaling pathways through which these mechanisms shape exercise-induced myocardial adaptation and cardioprotection remain to be systematically elucidated. At the same time, future studies may further incorporate emerging computational models and systematically integrate analyses of exercise adaptation–related anterograde and retrograde signaling pathways. Such approaches would enable a deeper, multiscale understanding of exercise-induced physiological regulatory mechanisms and provide a more precise and predictive theoretical framework for elucidating their underlying causal relationships.
8 Conclusion
This review highlights cardiac mitochondria as central targets of exercise-induced cardioprotection, summarizing regulatory effects across five domains: mitochondrial respiration, dynamics, calcium homeostasis, antioxidant defense, and inflammatory response. Numerous studies consistently indicate that exercise enhances myocardial metabolic adaptability and functional reserve by improving mitochondrial respiration, calcium homeostasis, and reducing systemic inflammation. However, the mechanisms by which exercise regulates mitochondrial dynamics and combats oxidative stress remain unclear, with existing evidence presenting contradictions. Further exploration of these potential regulatory mechanisms is therefore needed. Furthermore, the extent of exercise-induced cardioprotective effects appears to be closely influenced by exercise type, intensity, and duration.
Author contributions
JC: Validation, Visualization, Methodology, Software, Formal Analysis, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft. TW: Writing – review and editing, Methodology, Software, Validation, Data curation, Investigation, Visualization. SL: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review and editing, Resources, Visualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. The study was supported by Sichuan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. 2025NSFSC2021) and Sports Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province Research Excellence Initiative (No. 2025-A031).
Acknowledgements
All Figures were modified taken from Biorender (https://www.biorender.com/). The agreement numbers for the graphical abstract, Figures 1, 2 are YA28WKCTJP, LS28WBD2XY, and OK28WBC3RU, respectively.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Adams R. A., Liu Z., Hsieh C., Marko M., Lederer W. J., Jafri M. S., et al. (2023). Structural analysis of mitochondria in cardiomyocytes: insights into bioenergetics and membrane remodeling. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 45, 6097–6115. doi:10.3390/cimb45070385
Adebayo M., Singh S., Singh A. P., Dasgupta S. (2021). Mitochondrial fusion and fission: the fine-tune balance for cellular homeostasis. Faseb J. 35, e21620. doi:10.1096/fj.202100067R
Amar D., Gay N. R., Jimenez-Morales D., Jean Beltran P. M., Ramaker M. E., Raja A. N., et al. (2024). The mitochondrial multi-omic response to exercise training across rat tissues. Cell Metab. 36, 1411–1429.e10. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2023.12.021
An D., Zeng Q., Zhang P., Ma Z., Zhang H., Liu Z., et al. (2021). Alpha-ketoglutarate ameliorates pressure overload-induced chronic cardiac dysfunction in mice. Redox Biol. 46, 102088. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2021.102088
Andrieux P., Chevillard C., Cunha-Neto E., Nunes J. P. S. (2021). Mitochondria as a cellular hub in infection and inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 11338. doi:10.3390/ijms222111338
Arslan F., de Kleijn D. P., Pasterkamp G. (2011). Innate immune signaling in cardiac ischemia. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 8, 292–300. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2011.38
Atici A. E., Crother T. R., Noval Rivas M. (2023). Mitochondrial quality control in health and cardiovascular diseases. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 1290046. doi:10.3389/fcell.2023.1290046
Bai X., Zhang W., Zhang Y., Xu X. (2025). Downhill running regulates cardiac immune response through GCN2. PLoS One 20, e0329973. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0329973
Banerjee I., Fuseler J. W., Price R. L., Borg T. K., Baudino T. A. (2007). Determination of cell types and numbers during cardiac development in the neonatal and adult rat and mouse. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 293, H1883–H1891. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00514.2007
Bernardo B. C., Ooi J. Y. Y., Weeks K. L., Patterson N. L., Mcmullen J. R. (2018). Understanding key mechanisms of exercise-induced cardiac protection to mitigate disease: current knowledge and emerging concepts. Physiol. Rev. 98, 419–475. doi:10.1152/physrev.00043.2016
Bernecker C., Scherr J., Schinner S., Braun S., Scherbaum W. A., Halle M. (2013). Evidence for an exercise induced increase of TNF-α and IL-6 in marathon runners. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 23, 207–214. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01372.x
Bishop D. J., Lee M. J., Picard M. (2025). Exercise as mitochondrial medicine: how does the exercise prescription affect mitochondrial adaptations to training? Annu. Rev. Physiol. 87, 107–129. doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-022724-104836
Bouchard C., Antunes-Correa L. M., Ashley E. A., Franklin N., Hwang P. M., Mattsson C. M., et al. (2015). Personalized preventive medicine: genetics and the response to regular exercise in preventive interventions. Prog. Cardiovasc Dis. 57, 337–346. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2014.08.005
Bulthuis E. P., Dieteren C. E. J., Bergmans J., Berkhout J., Wagenaars J. A., van de Westerlo E. M. A., et al. (2023). Stress-dependent macromolecular crowding in the mitochondrial matrix. Embo J. 42, e108533. doi:10.15252/embj.2021108533
Burelle Y., Wambolt R. B., Grist M., Parsons H. L., Chow J. C., Antler C., et al. (2004). Regular exercise is associated with a protective metabolic phenotype in the rat heart. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 287, H1055–H1063. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00925.2003
Campos J. C., Marchesi Bozi L. H., Krum B., Grassmann Bechara L. R., Ferreira N. D., Arini G. S., et al. (2023). Exercise preserves physical fitness during aging through AMPK and mitochondrial dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 120, e2204750120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2204750120
Chaanine A. H., Joyce L. D., Stulak J. M., Maltais S., Joyce D. L., Dearani J. A., et al. (2019). Mitochondrial morphology, dynamics, and function in human pressure overload or ischemic heart disease with preserved or reduced ejection fraction. Circ. Heart Fail 12, e005131. doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.118.005131
Chan D. C. (2020). Mitochondrial dynamics and its involvement in disease. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 15, 235–259. doi:10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012419-032711
Chang C. P., Han P. (2016). Epigenetic and lncRNA regulation of cardiac pathophysiology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1863, 1767–1771. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.03.005
Chen W. K., Tsai Y. L., Shibu M. A., Shen C. Y., Chang-Lee S. N., Chen R. J., et al. (2018). Exercise training augments Sirt1-signaling and attenuates cardiac inflammation in D-galactose induced-aging rats. Aging (Albany NY) 10, 4166–4174. doi:10.18632/aging.101714
Chen Z., Huang L., Tso A., Wang S., Fang X., Ouyang K., et al. (2021). Mitochondrial chaperones and proteases in cardiomyocytes and heart failure. Front. Mol. Biosci. 8, 630332. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.630332
Chen H., Chen C., Spanos M., Li G., Lu R., Bei Y., et al. (2022). Exercise training maintains cardiovascular health: signaling pathways involved and potential therapeutics. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 7, 306. doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01153-1
Chen W., Zhao H., Li Y. (2023). Mitochondrial dynamics in health and disease: mechanisms and potential targets. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 8, 333. doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01547-9
Chennamsetty I., Coronado M., Contrepois K., Keller M. P., Carcamo-Orive I., Sandin J., et al. (2016). Nat1 deficiency is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and exercise intolerance in mice. Cell Rep. 17, 527–540. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.005
D'Amico D., Andreux P. A., ValdéS P., Singh A., Rinsch C., Auwerx J. (2021a). Impact of the natural compound urolithin A on health, disease, and aging. Trends Mol. Med. 27, 687–699. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2021.04.009
D'Amico D., Fiore R., Caporossi D., di Felice V. D., Cappello F., Dimauro I., et al. (2021b). Function and fiber-type specific distribution of Hsp60 and αB-Crystallin in skeletal muscles: role of physical exercise. Biol. (Basel) 10, 77. doi:10.3390/biology10020077
Da Silva V. L., Mota G. A. F., de Souza S. L. B., de Campos D. H. S., Melo A. B., Vileigas D. F., et al. (2023). Aerobic exercise training improves calcium handling and cardiac function in rats with heart failure resulting from aortic stenosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 12306. doi:10.3390/ijms241512306
Darfarin G., Pluth J. (2025). Mitochondria-nuclear crosstalk: orchestrating mtDNA maintenance. Environ. Mol. Mutagen 66, 222–242. doi:10.1002/em.70013
de La Fuente S., Lambert J. P., Nichtova Z., Fernandez Sanz C., Elrod J. W., Sheu S. S., et al. (2018). Spatial separation of mitochondrial calcium uptake and extrusion for energy-efficient mitochondrial calcium signaling in the heart. Cell Rep. 24, 3099–3107.e4. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.040
Ding P., Song Y., Yang Y., Zeng C. (2024). NLRP3 inflammasome and pyroptosis in cardiovascular diseases and exercise intervention. Front. Pharmacol. 15, 1368835. doi:10.3389/fphar.2024.1368835
Disatnik M. H., Ferreira J. C., Campos J. C., Gomes K. S., Dourado P. M., Qi X., et al. (2013). Acute inhibition of excessive mitochondrial fission after myocardial infarction prevents long-term cardiac dysfunction. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2, e000461. doi:10.1161/jaha.113.000461
Dos Santos J. A. C., Veras A. S. C., Batista V. R. G., Tavares M. E. A., Correia R. R., Suggett C. B., et al. (2022). Physical exercise and the functions of microRNAs. Life Sci. 304, 120723. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2022.120723
Drake J. C., Yan Z. (2019). Precision remodeling: how exercise improves mitochondrial quality in myofibers. Curr. Opin. Physiol. 10, 96–101. doi:10.1016/j.cophys.2019.05.005
Drake J. C., Wilson R. J., Laker R. C., Guan Y., Spaulding H. R., Nichenko A. S., et al. (2021). Mitochondria-localized AMPK responds to local energetics and contributes to exercise and energetic stress-induced mitophagy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118, e2025932118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2025932118
Duan C., Kuang L., Hong C., Xiang X., Liu J., Li Q., et al. (2021). Mitochondrial Drp1 recognizes and induces excessive mPTP opening after hypoxia through BAX-PiC and LRRK2-HK2. Cell Death Dis. 12, 1050. doi:10.1038/s41419-021-04343-x
Dubois M., Pallot F., Gouin-Gravezat M., Boulghobra D., Coste F., Walther G., et al. (2024). Exercise training May reduce fragmented mitochondria in the ischemic-reperfused heart through DRP1. J. Gen. Physiol. 156, e202313485. doi:10.1085/jgp.202313485
Fajardo G., Coronado M., Matthews M., Bernstein D. (2022). Mitochondrial quality control in the heart: the balance between physiological and pathological stress. Biomedicines 10, 1375. doi:10.3390/biomedicines10061375
Fan H., He Z., Huang H., Zhuang H., Liu H., Liu X., et al. (2020). Mitochondrial quality control in cardiomyocytes: a critical role in the progression of cardiovascular diseases. Front. Physiol. 11, 252. doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00252
Farhat F., Dupas J., Amérand A., Goanvec C., Feray A., Simon B., et al. (2015). Effect of exercise training on oxidative stress and mitochondrial function in rat heart and gastrocnemius muscle. Redox Rep. 20, 60–68. doi:10.1179/1351000214y.0000000105
Fathi M., Gharakhanlou R., Rezaei R. (2020). The changes of heart miR-1 and miR-133 expressions following physiological hypertrophy due to endurance training. Cell J. 22, 133–140. doi:10.22074/cellj.2020.7014
Feng N., Yu H., Wang Y., Zhang Y., Xiao H., Gao W. (2023). Exercise training attenuates angiotensin II-induced cardiac fibrosis by reducing POU2F1 expression. J. Sport Health Sci. 12, 464–476. doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2022.10.004
French J. P., Quindry J. C., Falk D. J., Staib J. L., Lee Y., Wang K. K., et al. (2006). Ischemia-reperfusion-induced calpain activation and SERCA2a degradation are attenuated by exercise training and calpain inhibition. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 290, H128–H136. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00739.2005
French J. P., Hamilton K. L., Quindry J. C., Lee Y., Upchurch P. A., Powers S. K. (2008). Exercise-induced protection against myocardial apoptosis and necrosis: mnsod, calcium-handling proteins, and calpain. Faseb J. 22, 2862–2871. doi:10.1096/fj.07-102541
Fritzen A. M., Thøgersen F. B., Thybo K., Vissing C. R., Krag T. O., Ruiz-Ruiz C., et al. (2019). Adaptations in mitochondrial enzymatic activity occurs independent of genomic dosage in response to aerobic exercise training and deconditioning in human skeletal muscle. Cells 8, 237. doi:10.3390/cells8030237
Fu G., Wang Z., Hu S. (2024). Exercise improves cardiac fibrosis by stimulating the release of endothelial progenitor cell-derived exosomes and upregulating miR-126 expression. Front. Cardiovasc Med. 11, 1323329. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2024.1323329
Fulghum K., Hill B. G. (2018). Metabolic mechanisms of exercise-induced cardiac remodeling. Front. Cardiovasc Med. 5, 127. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2018.00127
Gandre-Babbe S., van der Bliek A. M. (2008). The novel tail-anchored membrane protein Mff controls mitochondrial and peroxisomal fission in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 2402–2412. doi:10.1091/mbc.e07-12-1287
Gao S., Hu J. (2021). Mitochondrial fusion: the machineries in and out. Trends Cell Biol. 31, 62–74. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2020.09.008
Gao C., Chen X., Li J., Li Y., Tang Y., Liu L., et al. (2014). Myocardial mitochondrial oxidative stress and dysfunction in intense exercise: regulatory effects of quercetin. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 114, 695–705. doi:10.1007/s00421-013-2802-9
Ghavami S., Zamani M., Ahmadi M., Erfani M., Dastghaib S., Darbandi M., et al. (2022). Epigenetic regulation of autophagy in gastrointestinal cancers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 1868, 166512. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2022.166512
Ghezzi D., Zeviani M. (2018). Human diseases associated with defects in assembly of OXPHOS complexes. Essays Biochem. 62, 271–286. doi:10.1042/ebc20170099
Gibb A. A., Hill B. G. (2018). Metabolic coordination of physiological and pathological cardiac remodeling. Circ. Res. 123, 107–128. doi:10.1161/circresaha.118.312017
Godoy Coto J., Pereyra E. V., Cavalli F. A., Valverde C. A., Caldiz C. I., Maté S. M., et al. (2024). Exercise-induced cardiac mitochondrial reorganization and enhancement in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Pflugers Arch. 476, 1109–1123. doi:10.1007/s00424-024-02956-7
Goetzman E., Gong Z., Zhang B., Muzumdar R. (2023). Complex II biology in aging, health, and disease. Antioxidants (Basel) 12, 1477. doi:10.3390/antiox12071477
Granata C., Oliveira R. S., Little J. P., Renner K., Bishop D. J. (2016). Training intensity modulates changes in PGC-1α and p53 protein content and mitochondrial respiration, but not markers of mitochondrial content in human skeletal muscle. Faseb J. 30, 959–970. doi:10.1096/fj.15-276907
Granata C., Jamnick N. A., Bishop D. J. (2018). Training-induced changes in mitochondrial content and respiratory function in human skeletal muscle. Sports Med. 48, 1809–1828. doi:10.1007/s40279-018-0936-y
Guan S., Zhao L., Peng R. (2022). Mitochondrial respiratory chain supercomplexes: from structure to function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 13880. doi:10.3390/ijms232213880
Gupta A., Becker T. (2021). Mechanisms and pathways of mitochondrial outer membrane protein biogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1862, 148323. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2020.148323
Hafstad A. D., Boardman N. T., Lund J., Hagve M., Khalid A. M., WisløFF U., et al. (2011). High intensity interval training alters substrate utilization and reduces oxygen consumption in the heart. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 111, 1235–1241. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00594.2011
Haghighi A. H., Bandali M. R., Askari R., Shahrabadi H., Barone R., Bei R., et al. (2025). The effects of different exercise training protocols on mitochondrial dynamics in skeletal and cardiac muscles of wistar rats. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 20, 395. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-05809-w
Hasan P., Berezhnaya E., RodríGUEZ-Prados M., Weaver D., Bekeova C., Cartes-Saavedra B., et al. (2024). MICU1 and MICU2 control mitochondrial calcium signaling in the mammalian heart. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 121, e2402491121. doi:10.1073/pnas.2402491121
He W., Tang Y., Li C., Zhang X., Huang S., Tan B., et al. (2021). Exercise enhanced cardiac function in mice with radiation-induced heart disease via the FNDC5/Irisin-Dependent mitochondrial turnover pathway. Front. Physiol. 12, 739485. doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.739485
Hernandez-Resendiz S., Prakash A., Loo S. J., Semenzato M., Chinda K., Crespo-Avilan G. E., et al. (2023). Targeting mitochondrial shape: at the heart of cardioprotection. Basic Res. Cardiol. 118, 49. doi:10.1007/s00395-023-01019-9
Hinton A., JR., Claypool S. M., Neikirk K., Senoo N., Wanjalla C. N., Kirabo A., et al. (2024). Mitochondrial structure and function in human heart failure. Circ. Res. 135, 372–396. doi:10.1161/circresaha.124.323800
Huang Z., Wilson J. J. (2023). Structure-activity relationships of metal-based inhibitors of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter. ChemMedChem 18, e202300106. doi:10.1002/cmdc.202300106
Huynh K. W., Pamenter M. E. (2022). Lactate inhibits naked mole-rat cardiac mitochondrial respiration. J. Comp. Physiol. B 192, 501–511. doi:10.1007/s00360-022-01430-z
Isaksen K., Halvorsen B., Munk P. S., Aukrust P., Larsen A. I. (2019). Effects of interval training on inflammatory biomarkers in patients with ischemic heart failure. Scand. Cardiovasc J. 53, 213–219. doi:10.1080/14017431.2019.1629004
Isei M. O., Stevens D., Kamunde C. (2021). Temperature rise and copper exposure reduce heart mitochondrial reactive oxygen species scavenging capacity. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 243, 108999. doi:10.1016/j.cbpc.2021.108999
Jeppesen T. D. (2020). Aerobic exercise training in patients with mtDNA-Related mitochondrial myopathy. Front. Physiol. 11, 349. doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00349
Jia D., Hou L., Lv Y., Xi L., Tian Z. (2019). Postinfarction exercise training alleviates cardiac dysfunction and adverse remodeling via mitochondrial biogenesis and SIRT1/PGC-1α/PI3K/Akt signaling. J. Cell Physiol. 234, 23705–23718. doi:10.1002/jcp.28939
Jiang H. K., Wang Y. H., Sun L., He X., Zhao M., Feng Z. H., et al. (2014). Aerobic interval training attenuates mitochondrial dysfunction in rats post-myocardial infarction: roles of mitochondrial network dynamics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15, 5304–5322. doi:10.3390/ijms15045304
Jin J. Y., Wei X. X., Zhi X. L., Wang X. H., Meng D. (2021). Drp1-dependent mitochondrial fission in cardiovascular disease. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 42, 655–664. doi:10.1038/s41401-020-00518-y
Kappler L., Hoene M., Hu C., von Toerne C., Li J., Bleher D., et al. (2019). Linking bioenergetic function of mitochondria to tissue-specific molecular fingerprints. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 317, E374–e387. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00088.2019
Kasai S., Shimizu S., Tatara Y., Mimura J., Itoh K. (2020). Regulation of Nrf2 by mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in physiology and pathology. Biomolecules 10, 320. doi:10.3390/biom10020320
Kemi O. J., Haram P. M., WisløFF U., Ellingsen Ø. (2004). Aerobic fitness is associated with cardiomyocyte contractile capacity and endothelial function in exercise training and detraining. Circulation 109, 2897–2904. doi:10.1161/01.Cir.0000129308.04757.72
Kim K. H., Son J. M., Benayoun B. A., Lee C. (2018). The mitochondrial-encoded peptide MOTS-c translocates to the nucleus to regulate nuclear gene expression in response to metabolic stress. Cell Metab. 28, 516–524.e7. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.06.008
Kwak H. B., Song W., Lawler J. M. (2006). Exercise training attenuates age-induced elevation in Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, apoptosis, and remodeling in the rat heart. Faseb J. 20, 791–793. doi:10.1096/fj.05-5116fje
Laker R. C., Drake J. C., Wilson R. J., Lira V. A., Lewellen B. M., Ryall K. A., et al. (2017). Ampk phosphorylation of Ulk1 is required for targeting of mitochondria to lysosomes in exercise-induced mitophagy. Nat. Commun. 8, 548. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00520-9
Laranjo L., Lanas F., Sun M. C., Chen D. A., Hynes L., Imran T. F., et al. (2024). World heart Federation roadmap for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: 2023 update. Glob. Heart 19, 8. doi:10.5334/gh.1278
Lee Y. J., Jeong S. Y., Karbowski M., Smith C. L., Youle R. J. (2004). Roles of the mammalian mitochondrial fission and fusion mediators Fis1, Drp1, and Opa1 in apoptosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 5001–5011. doi:10.1091/mbc.e04-04-0294
Li H., Miao W., Ma J., XV Z., Bo H., Li J., et al. (2016). Acute exercise-induced mitochondrial stress triggers an inflammatory response in the myocardium via NLRP3 inflammasome activation with mitophagy. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2016, 1987149. doi:10.1155/2016/1987149
Li Y., Xu P., Wang Y., Zhang J., Yang M., Chang Y., et al. (2020). Different intensity exercise preconditions affect cardiac function of exhausted rats through regulating TXNIP/TRX/NF-ĸB(p65)/NLRP3 inflammatory pathways. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 5809298. doi:10.1155/2020/5809298
Li J. J., Ping Z., Wang Z. W., Wang Y. B., Shi C. M., Cao X. B. (2022). Experimental study of mitochondrion-targeted small molecule IR-61 ameliorated exhaustive exercise-induced cardiac injury in rats. Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi 38, 497–503. doi:10.12047/j.cjap.6260.2022.093
Li K., Li S., Jia H., Song Y., Chen Z., Wang Y. (2025a). Aerobic exercise alleviates cardiac dysfunction correlated with lipidomics and mitochondrial quality control. Antioxidants (Basel) 14, 748. doi:10.3390/antiox14060748
Li Q., Liu Q., Lin Z., Lin W., Lin Z., Huang F., et al. (2025b). Comparison between the effect of mid-late-life high-intensity interval training and continuous moderate-intensity training in old mouse hearts. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 80, glaf025. doi:10.1093/gerona/glaf025
Liang R., Hou X., Zhou D., Zhu L., Teng L., Song W., et al. (2024). Exercise preconditioning mitigates ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats by enhancing mitochondrial respiration. Neuroscience 562, 64–74. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.10.045
Liu S., Lai J., Feng Y., Zhuo Y., Zhang H., Chen Y., et al. (2023a). Acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 depletion suppresses de novo fatty acid synthesis and mitochondrial β-oxidation in castration-resistant prostate cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 299, 102720. doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102720
Liu Z. Y., Song K., Tu B., Lin L. C., Sun H., Zhou Y., et al. (2023b). Crosstalk between oxidative stress and epigenetic marks: new roles and therapeutic implications in cardiac fibrosis. Redox Biol. 65, 102820. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2023.102820
Lopaschuk G. D., Ussher J. R., Folmes C. D., Jaswal J. S., Stanley W. C. (2010). Myocardial fatty acid metabolism in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 90, 207–258. doi:10.1152/physrev.00015.2009
Lopaschuk G. D., Karwi Q. G., Tian R., Wende A. R., Abel E. D. (2021). Cardiac energy metabolism in heart failure. Circ. Res. 128, 1487–1513. doi:10.1161/circresaha.121.318241
Lortie G., Simoneau J. A., Hamel P., Boulay M. R., Landry F., Bouchard C. (1984). Responses of maximal aerobic power and capacity to aerobic training. Int. J. Sports Med. 5, 232–236. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1025911
Lu K., Wang L., Wang C., Yang Y., Hu D., Ding R. (2015). Effects of high-intensity interval versus continuous moderate-intensity aerobic exercise on apoptosis, oxidative stress and metabolism of the infarcted myocardium in a rat model. Mol. Med. Rep. 12, 2374–2382. doi:10.3892/mmr.2015.3669
Lu X., Thai P. N., Lu S., Pu J., Bers D. M. (2019). Intrafibrillar and perinuclear mitochondrial heterogeneity in adult cardiac myocytes. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 136, 72–84. doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.08.013
Lv Y., Cheng L., Peng F. (2022). Compositions and functions of mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes and their contribution to cardioprotection by exercise preconditioning. Front. Physiol. 13, 910452. doi:10.3389/fphys.2022.910452
Ma Q. (2013). Role of nrf2 in oxidative stress and toxicity. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 53, 401–426. doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-011112-140320
Ma Y., Kuang Y., Bo W., Liang Q., Zhu W., Cai M., et al. (2021). Exercise training alleviates cardiac fibrosis through increasing fibroblast growth factor 21 and regulating TGF-β1-Smad2/3-MMP2/9 signaling in mice with myocardial infarction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 12341. doi:10.3390/ijms222212341
Ma X., Gao H., Wang Z., Zhu D., Dai W., Wu M., et al. (2025a). Beneficial effects of different types of exercise on diabetic cardiomyopathy. Biomolecules 15, 1223. doi:10.3390/biom15091223
Ma Z., Cen Y., Xun W., Mou C., Yu J., Hu Y., et al. (2025b). Exercise enhances cardiomyocyte mitochondrial homeostasis to alleviate left ventricular dysfunction in pressure overload induced remodelling. Sci. Rep. 15, 11698. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-95637-z
Marcil M., Bourduas K., Ascah A., Burelle Y. (2006). Exercise training induces respiratory substrate-specific decrease in Ca2+-induced permeability transition pore opening in heart mitochondria. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 290, H1549–H1557. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00913.2005
Memme J. M., Hood D. A. (2020). Molecular basis for the therapeutic effects of exercise on mitochondrial defects. Front. Physiol. 11, 615038. doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.615038
Meng M. (2017). Digitoflavone (DG) attenuates LPS-induced acute lung injury through reducing oxidative stress and inflammatory response dependent on the suppression of TXNIP/NLRP3 and NF-κB. Biomed. Pharmacother. 94, 712–725. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2017.07.001
Mozdy A. D., Mccaffery J. M., Shaw J. M. (2000). Dnm1p GTPase-mediated mitochondrial fission is a multi-step process requiring the novel integral membrane component Fis1p. J. Cell Biol. 151, 367–380. doi:10.1083/jcb.151.2.367
Nguyen P., Le L. K., Ananthapavan J., Gao L., Dunstan D. W., Moodie M. (2022). Economics of sedentary behaviour: a systematic review of cost of illness, cost-effectiveness, and return on investment studies. Prev. Med. 156, 106964. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.106964
No M. H., Heo J. W., Yoo S. Z., Kim C. J., Park D. H., Kang J. H., et al. (2020). Effects of aging and exercise training on mitochondrial function and apoptosis in the rat heart. Pflugers Arch. 472, 179–193. doi:10.1007/s00424-020-02357-6
Okoye C. N., Koren S. A., Wojtovich A. P. (2023). Mitochondrial complex I ROS production and redox signaling in hypoxia. Redox Biol. 67, 102926. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2023.102926
Otten A. B. C., Kamps R., Lindsey P., Gerards M., Pendeville-Samain H., Muller M., et al. (2020). Tfam knockdown results in reduction of mtDNA copy number, OXPHOS deficiency and abnormalities in zebrafish embryos. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 381. doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.00381
Park J. Y., Wang P. Y., Matsumoto T., Sung H. J., Ma W., Choi J. W., et al. (2009). p53 improves aerobic exercise capacity and augments skeletal muscle mitochondrial DNA content. Circ. Res. 105, 705–712. doi:10.1161/circresaha.109.205310
PasmiñO G., Paredes M., Silva H. (2024). Effects of high-intensity swimming interval training on area, perimeter, circularity index and phenotype of cardiac mitochondrial ultrastructure in sprague dawley rats. Life (Basel) 14, 984. doi:10.3390/life14080984
Peoples J. N., Saraf A., Ghazal N., Pham T. T., Kwong J. Q. (2019). Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in heart disease. Exp. Mol. Med. 51, 1–13. doi:10.1038/s12276-019-0355-7
Perera N., Deo M., Tegegne S., Tham Y. K., Mellett N. A., Velagic A., et al. (2025). Influence of diet-induced obesity and voluntary exercise training on cardiac lipids and mitochondrial function in mice. J. Sport Health Sci. 15, 101095. doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101095
Popoiu T. A., Maack C., Bertero E. (2023). Mitochondrial calcium signaling and redox homeostasis in cardiac health and disease. Front. Mol. Med. 3, 1235188. doi:10.3389/fmmed.2023.1235188
Protasoni M., Zeviani M. (2021). Mitochondrial structure and bioenergetics in normal and disease conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 586. doi:10.3390/ijms22020586
Quindry J. C., Michalak R. E. (2025). Exercise-induced cardioprotection: from endogenous to exogenous mechanisms. Sports Med. Health Sci. 7, 366–374. doi:10.1016/j.smhs.2025.03.009
Riehle C., Wende A. R., Zhu Y., Oliveira K. J., Pereira R. O., Jaishy B. P., et al. (2014). Insulin receptor substrates are essential for the bioenergetic and hypertrophic response of the heart to exercise training. Mol. Cell Biol. 34, 3450–3460. doi:10.1128/mcb.00426-14
Rodrigues E. A., Lima A. R. R., Gomes M. J., Souza L. M., Pontes T. H. D., Pagan L. U., et al. (2023). Influence of isolated resistance exercise on cardiac remodeling, myocardial oxidative stress, and metabolism in infarcted rats. Antioxidants (Basel) 12, 896. doi:10.3390/antiox12040896
Rurik J. G., Aghajanian H., Epstein J. A. (2021). Immune cells and immunotherapy for cardiac injury and repair. Circ. Res. 128, 1766–1779. doi:10.1161/circresaha.121.318005
Sabouri M., Hatami E., Pournemati P., Shabkhiz F. (2021). Inflammatory, antioxidant and glycemic status to different mode of high-intensity training in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mol. Biol. Rep. 48, 5291–5304. doi:10.1007/s11033-021-06539-y
Sanford J. A., Nogiec C. D., Lindholm M. E., Adkins J. N., Amar D., Dasari S., et al. (2020). Molecular transducers of physical activity consortium (MoTrPAC): mapping the dynamic responses to exercise. Cell 181, 1464–1474. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.004
Santos-Alves E., Marques-Aleixo I., Rizo-Roca D., Torrella J. R., Oliveira P. J., MagalhãES J., et al. (2015). Exercise modulates liver cellular and mitochondrial proteins related to quality control signaling. Life Sci. 135, 124–130. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2015.06.007
Saris N. E., Sirota T. V., Virtanen I., Niva K., Penttilä T., Dolgachova L. P., et al. (1993). Inhibition of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter by antibodies against a 40-kDa glycoproteinT. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 25, 307–312. doi:10.1007/bf00762591
Scarpulla R. C. (2011). Metabolic control of mitochondrial biogenesis through the PGC-1 family regulatory network. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1813, 1269–1278. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.09.019
Schulz R., SchlüTER K. D. (2023). Importance of mitochondria in cardiac pathologies: focus on uncoupling proteins and monoamine oxidases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 6459. doi:10.3390/ijms24076459
Shi Y., Zhang H., Huang S., Yin L., Wang F., Luo P., et al. (2022). Epigenetic regulation in cardiovascular disease: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 7, 200. doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01055-2
Shin C. S., Meng S., Garbis S. D., Moradian A., Taylor R. W., Sweredoski M. J., et al. (2021). LONP1 and mtHSP70 cooperate to promote mitochondrial protein folding. Nat. Commun. 12, 265. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20597-z
Silver J. L., Lamon S., Loke S., Mazzarino G., Croft L., Ziemann M., et al. (2025). Skeletal muscle mitochondria contain nuclear-encoded RNA species prior to and following adaptation to exercise training in rats. Faseb J. 39, e70702. doi:10.1096/fj.202500157R
Starnes J. W., Taylor R. P. (2007). Exercise-induced cardioprotection: endogenous mechanisms. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc 39, 1537–1543. doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3180d099d4
Starnes J. W., Barnes B. D., Olsen M. E. (2007). Exercise training decreases rat heart mitochondria free radical generation but does not prevent Ca2+-induced dysfunction. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 102, 1793–1798. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00849.2006
Sun Q., Karwi Q. G., Wong N., Lopaschuk G. D. (2024). Advances in myocardial energy metabolism: metabolic remodelling in heart failure and beyond. Cardiovasc Res. 120, 1996–2016. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvae231
Suvorava T., Cortese-Krott M. M. (2018). Exercise-induced cardioprotection via eNOS: a putative role of red blood cell signaling. Curr. Med. Chem. 25, 4457–4474. doi:10.2174/0929867325666180307112557
Takeuchi A., Matsuoka S. (2021). Physiological and pathophysiological roles of mitochondrial Na(+)-Ca(2+) exchanger, NCLX, in hearts. Biomolecules 11, 1876. doi:10.3390/biom11121876
Tocantins C., Martins J. D., Rodrigues Ó M., Grilo L. F., Diniz M. S., Stevanovic-Silva J., et al. (2023). Metabolic mitochondrial alterations prevail in the female rat heart 8 weeks after exercise cessation. Eur. J. Clin. Invest 53, e14069. doi:10.1111/eci.14069
Tokuyama T., Yanagi S. (2023). Role of mitochondrial dynamics in heart diseases. Genes (Basel) 14, 1876. doi:10.3390/genes14101876
Toldo S., Abbate A. (2024). The role of the NLRP3 inflammasome and pyroptosis in cardiovascular diseases. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 21, 219–237. doi:10.1038/s41569-023-00946-3
Tuon T., Souza P. S., Santos M. F., Pereira F. T., Pedroso G. S., Luciano T. F., et al. (2015). Physical training regulates mitochondrial parameters and neuroinflammatory mechanisms in an experimental model of parkinson's disease. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2015, 261809. doi:10.1155/2015/261809
Vercellino I., Sazanov L. A. (2022). The assembly, regulation and function of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 141–161. doi:10.1038/s41580-021-00415-0
Viloria M. A. D., Li Q., Lu W., Nhu N. T., Liu Y., Cui Z. Y., et al. (2022). Effect of exercise training on cardiac mitochondrial respiration, biogenesis, dynamics, and mitophagy in ischemic heart disease. Front. Cardiovasc Med. 9, 949744. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2022.949744
Wan W., Zhang L., Lin Y., Rao X., Wang X., Hua F., et al. (2023). Mitochondria-derived peptide MOTS-c: effects and mechanisms related to stress, metabolism and aging. J. Transl. Med. 21, 36. doi:10.1186/s12967-023-03885-2
Wang J., Liu S., Meng X., Zhao X., Wang T., Lei Z., et al. (2024). Exercise inhibits doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity via regulating B cells. Circ. Res. 134, 550–568. doi:10.1161/circresaha.123.323346
Waseem R., Shamsi A., Mohammad T., Hassan M. I., Kazim S. N., Chaudhary A. A., et al. (2022). FNDC5/Irisin: Physiology and pathophysiology. Molecules 27, 1118. doi:10.3390/molecules27031118
Wei Z., Ahmad M., Chen R., Fatima S., Shah S. (2025). High-intensity interval training improves mitochondrial function and attenuates cardiomyocytes damage in ischemia-reperfusion. Int. J. Cardiol. Heart Vasc. 60, 101756. doi:10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101756
Xi Y., Hao M., Liang Q., Li Y., Gong D. W., Tian Z. (2021). Dynamic resistance exercise increases skeletal muscle-derived FSTL1 inducing cardiac angiogenesis via DIP2A-Smad2/3 in rats following myocardial infarction. J. Sport Health Sci. 10, 594–603. doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2020.11.010
Xiong Y., Xu J., Cao W., Zhang J., Feng Z., Cao K., et al. (2022). Hydroxytyrosol improves strenuous exercise-associated cardiac pathological changes via modulation of mitochondrial homeostasis. Food Funct. 13, 8676–8684. doi:10.1039/d2fo00839d
Xu H. X., Cui S. M., Zhang Y. M., Ren J. (2020). Mitochondrial Ca(2+) regulation in the etiology of heart failure: physiological and pathophysiological implications. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 41, 1301–1309. doi:10.1038/s41401-020-0476-5
Yamada T., Kimura I., Ashida Y., Tamai K., Fusagawa H., Tohse N., et al. (2021). Larger improvements in fatigue resistance and mitochondrial function with high-than with low-intensity contractions during interval training of mouse skeletal muscle. Faseb J. 35, e21988. doi:10.1096/fj.202101204R
Yan Z., Lira V. A., Greene N. P. (2012). Exercise training-induced regulation of mitochondrial quality. Exerc Sport Sci. Rev. 40, 159–164. doi:10.1097/JES.0b013e3182575599
Yang Z., Wang L., Yang C., Pu S., Guo Z., Wu Q., et al. (2021). Mitochondrial membrane remodeling. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 786806. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.786806
Yang M., Xiao Z., Chen Z., Ru Y., Wang J., Jiang J., et al. (2022). S100A1 is involved in myocardial injury induced by exhaustive exercise. Int. J. Sports Med. 43, 444–454. doi:10.1055/a-1642-8352
Yao D., Li Y., Zeng S., Li Z., Shah Z., Song B., et al. (2022). Short-form OPA1 is a molecular chaperone in mitochondrial intermembrane space. Sci. China Life Sci. 65, 227–235. doi:10.1007/s11427-021-1962-0
Yoo S. Z., No M. H., Heo J. W., Park D. H., Kang J. H., Kim J. H., et al. (2019). Effects of acute exercise on mitochondrial function, dynamics, and mitophagy in rat cardiac and skeletal muscles. Int. Neurourol. J. 23, S22–S31. doi:10.5213/inj.1938038.019
Yuan S., Kuai Z., Zhao F., Xu D., Wu W. (2025a). Improving effect of physical exercise on heart failure: reducing oxidative stress-induced inflammation by restoring Ca(2+) homeostasis. Mol. Cell Biochem. 480, 2471–2486. doi:10.1007/s11010-024-05124-8
Yuan S., Ye Q., Qin R. (2025b). Cardioepigenetics in action: aerobic exercise-induced modulation of miRNAs, lncRNAs, and chromatin remodeling in cardiovascular disease. Front. Cardiovasc Med. 12, 1579352. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1579352
Zanini G., Selleri V., Malerba M., Solodka K., Sinigaglia G., Nasi M., et al. (2023). The role of Lonp1 on mitochondrial functions during cardiovascular and muscular diseases. Antioxidants (Basel) 12, 598. doi:10.3390/antiox12030598
Zhang D., Wang F., Li P., Gao Y. (2022). Mitochondrial Ca(2+) homeostasis: emerging roles and clinical significance in cardiac remodeling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 3025. doi:10.3390/ijms23063025
Zhang M., Alemasi A., Zhao M., Xu W., Zhang Y., Gao W., et al. (2023). Exercise training attenuates acute β-Adrenergic receptor activation-induced cardiac inflammation via the activation of AMP-activated protein kinase. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 9263. doi:10.3390/ijms24119263
Zhao H. X., Zhang Z., Zhou H. L., Hu F., Yu Y. (2020). Exercise training suppresses Mst1 activation and attenuates myocardial dysfunction in mice with type 1 diabetes. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 98, 777–784. doi:10.1139/cjpp-2020-0205
Zhuo C., Xin J., Huang W., Zhang D., Yan X., Li R., et al. (2023). Irisin protects against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity by improving AMPK-Nrf2 dependent mitochondrial fusion and strengthening endogenous anti-oxidant defense mechanisms. Toxicology 494, 153597. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2023.153597
Zong Y., Li H., Liao P., Chen L., Pan Y., Zheng Y., et al. (2024). Mitochondrial dysfunction: mechanisms and advances in therapy. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 9, 124. doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01839-8
Keywords: exercise, heart, inflammatory response, mitochondria, oxidative stress
Citation: Cai J, Wang T and Li S (2026) Mitochondria: the central hub linking exercise to enhanced cardiac function. Front. Physiol. 17:1747133. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2026.1747133
Received: 15 November 2025; Accepted: 08 January 2026;
Published: 02 February 2026.
Edited by:
Hassane Zouhal, International Institute of Sport Sciences (2I2S), FranceReviewed by:
Samir José Bolívar González, University of Atlántico, ColombiaSriram Ravindran, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
Copyright © 2026 Cai, Wang and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shunchang Li, bGlzaHVuY2hhbmdAY2RzdS5lZHUuY24=