ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Physiol.
Sec. Exercise Physiology
This article is part of the Research TopicOptimizing athletic performance: Synergistic effects of plyometric and integrated training modalitiesView all 6 articles
Effects of weighted vests versus elastic bands plyometric jump training on lower-body physical performance adaptations in volleyball players
Provisionally accepted
- Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of different plyometric jump training (PJT) loading strategies, using either weighted vests (WV) or elastic bands (EB), on the physical and physiological performance of young volleyball players. Methods: Thirty-two male volleyball players participated in the study and were randomly assigned to WV-PJT (n=8), EB-PJT (n=8), unloaded PJT (UL-PJT, n=8), and a control group (CG, n=8). The players in the WV and EB groups performed PJT with resistance equivalent to 10% of body mass, while the UL group engaged in PJT without any additional loads. Moreover, the players in the CG only performed regular volleyball practice. Countermovement vertical jump (CMVJ), 10-m sprint, T-test change of direction speed (T-CODS), reactive strength index (RSI), 1 repetition maximum of leg press (1RMLP), and Wingate anaerobic power tests were measured before and after the eight-week training period. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) (4 [group] x 2 [time]), followed by Bonferroni post-hoc testing, was employed to identify any significant differences in pairwise comparisons. Results: All training groups (i.e., WV-PJT, EB-PJT, and UL-PJT) showed significant improvements (p = 0.001) in physical and physiological performance outcomes, with effect sizes ranging from small to large over the training period. Both the WV-PJT and EB-PJT groups exhibited greater adaptive changes (p < 0.05) compared to the UL-PJT group after the intervention. For the 1RMLP, the WV-PJT group demonstrated significantly greater adaptive responses (p = 0.011, standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.51, 95% CI = -0.51 to 1.48) than the EB-PJT group. Conversely, the EB-PJT group showed greater adaptations in the RSI (p = 0.041, SMD = 0.46, 95% CI = -0.53 to 1.45), as well as in peak power (p = 0.006, SMD = 0.49, 95% CI = -0.53 to 1.46) and mean power output (p = 0.017, SMD = 0.33, 95% CI = -0.67 to 1.30) compared to the WV-PJT group. Conclusion: Loaded PJT is an effective method for producing greater adaptations in volleyball players. Specifically, WV-PJT is more beneficial for strength gains, while EB-PJT is superior for improving RSI and anaerobic power output.
Keywords: Athletic Performance, Ball sports, bio-motor abilities, Physical conditioning, Sport-Specific Training
Received: 28 Nov 2025; Accepted: 16 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Bao, Qiao and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Shouwen Yang
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.