Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Remote Sens.

Sec. Land Cover and Land Use Change

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frsen.2025.1625373

The Role of Data Selection in Mapping Urban Green and Open Spaces: A Comparison Across High and Very-High Resolution Satellite Imagery Sources in Two African Cities

Provisionally accepted
  • Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Urban green and open spaces (UGOS) provide essential social, cultural, environmental, and economic benefits; therefore, monitoring UGOS is critical for guiding management and strengthening urban resilience. Spatial analysis of Earth Observation data offers a practical means of evaluating UGOS, and with the availability of high and very-high spatial resolution (VHR) satellite imagery (≤10 m), UGOS can be characterized across broad spatial and temporal scales. While VHR imagery (≤3 m) can enable more refined characterizations of land cover (LC), its use may be constrained by costs, access barriers, and reduced coverage. This study investigates the implications of utilizing imagery sources of varying resolution (≤10 m) and differing classification approaches—pixel-based versus object-based—on LC characterizations and UGOS assessments in two urbanizing cities: Mekelle, Ethiopia and Polokwane, South Africa in 2020. LC classifications were derived from Sentinel-2 (10 m), PlanetScope SuperDove (3 m), and Maxar WorldView-3 multispectral (2 m) and pansharpened (0.5 m) imagery. Mapping accuracy and UGOS characteristics were evaluated for each city, including the composition of undeveloped versus developed land, tall vegetation cover, and LC within selected public spaces. Additionally, the share of streets and open space under Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 11.7.1 was assessed. WorldView-3 multispectral LC maps consistently achieved the highest overall classification accuracies—92% in Mekelle and 86% in Polokwane—suggesting spatial resolution alone does not guarantee higher accuracy, and spectral richness is important for mapping complex vegetation. Although VHR imagery enhanced detection of small and fragmented landscape features, such as trees, classification performance depended on context, resolution, method, and image characteristics. Coarser imagery like Sentinel-2 proved practical for broader assessments (e.g., SDG 11.7.1) but may underrepresent undeveloped space and miss fine-scale variation. Results revealed clearer spatial patterns and resolution-dependent trends in Mekelle, while findings in Polokwane were more variable, suggesting that landscape structure and urban form influence classification outcomes and UGOS metrics. This study highlights the importance of carefully selecting and interpreting Earth Observation imagery based on resolution, method, timing, and landscape context, especially when data options are limited.

Keywords: sdgs, Urban Africa, Sentinel-2, PlanetScope SuperDove, Maxar WorldView-3

Received: 08 May 2025; Accepted: 15 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Cardenas-Ritzert, Shah Heydari, Rode, Filippelli, Laituri, McHale and Vogeler. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Orion SE Cardenas-Ritzert, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.