ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Remote Sens.
Sec. Image Analysis and Classification
This article is part of the Research TopicMachine Learning for Advanced Remote Sensing: From Theory to Applications and Societal ImpactView all 7 articles
3D Colored Point Cloud Classification of a Deep-Sea Cold-Water Coral and Sponge Habitat Using Geometric Features and Machine Learning Algorithms
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Ocean Technology, Memorial University of Newfoundland Fisheries and Marine Institute, St. John's, Canada
- 2Public Works Department, Cairo University Faculty of Engineering, Cairo, Egypt
- 3Fisheries and Marine Institute, School of Fisheries, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Classification of benthic habitats in the deep sea is instrumental in managing and monitoring marine ecosystems as it provides distinct units for which changes can be quantified over time. These applications require automatic classification approaches with reasonable accuracy to ensure efficiency and robustness. The use of 3D point clouds is currently emerging in deep-sea benthic classification as it allows for high-resolution representation of the 3D structure (i.e., geometry), texture, and composition of complex benthic habitats such as those created by structure-forming cold-water corals. Point clouds were derived from remotely operated vehicle video surveys of three vertical walls (depth range 1400-1900 m) along the Charlie-Gibbs Fracture Zone, North Atlantic. In addition to RGB values, this research incorporated nine geometric features derived from structure-from-motion 3D point clouds to classify coral and sponge colonies. Three unsupervised (k-means (KM), fuzzy c-means (FCM), and Gaussian mixture model (GMM)) and three supervised (decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA)) machine learning (ML) algorithms were compared and assessed for accuracy and reliability. The ML classifiers were used to build full-coverage seafloor predictions for three classes, namely seabed, sponges, and corals. The KM, GMM, and FCM achieved an average overall accuracy of 74.87%, 71.94 %, and 70.77%, respectively, while the RF, LDA, and DT achieved 84.50%, 84.01%, and 79.90%, respectively. Overall, the supervised ML classifiers outperformed the unsupervised ML classifiers. In particular, the RF classifier demonstrated the highest overall classification accuracy and F1-score for individual classes, with an average of 89.09%, 67.12%, and 41.60% for the seabed, sponges, and corals, respectively. In addition, the spatial coherence of the point clouds was considered and improved the results’ overall accuracy and F1-score by up to 9% and 12%, respectively. Results showed that incorporating geometric features, traditionally employed in terrestrial and shallow-water LiDAR surveys, in combination with RGB values is suitable for high-resolution deep-sea benthic 3D point clouds classification.
Keywords: seafloor mapping, Classification, Structure-from-Motion (SfM), Geometric features, machine learning, Cold-water Corals, Sponges, deep-sea
Received: 05 Aug 2025; Accepted: 07 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Morsy, Yánez-Suárez and Robert. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Salem Morsy, salem.morsy@mi.mun.ca
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
