Abstract
Glia are as numerous in the brain as neurons and widely known to serve supportive roles such as structural scaffolding, extracellular ionic and neurotransmitter homeostasis, and metabolic support. However, over the past two decades, several lines of evidence indicate that astrocytes, which are a type of glia, play active roles in neural information processing. Astrocytes, although not electrically active, can exhibit a form of excitability by dynamic changes in intracellular calcium levels. They sense synaptic activity and release neuroactive substances, named gliotransmitters, that modulate neuronal activity and synaptic transmission in several brain areas, thus impacting animal behavior. This “dialogue” between astrocytes and neurons is embodied in the concept of the tripartite synapse that includes astrocytes as integral elements of synaptic function. Here, we review the recent work and discuss how astrocytes via calcium-mediated excitability modulate synaptic information processing at various spatial and time scales.
Introduction
Nervous systems throughout the animal kingdom vary in structure and complexity and are made up of neurons, specialized cells that can receive and transmit chemical or electrical signals, and glial cells, historically considered to only provide support functions to neurons. Glial cells were first described by Virchow in the 1850s as “nervenkitt” or nerve glue, implying a homogenous population of support cells holding them together (García-Marín et al., 2007). However, several different types of glia can be differentiated based on their different functions and morphology. Among them, there are microglia, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes. The term astrocyte was coined by Michael von Lenhossek to describe star-shaped cells observed in histological brain specimens (Parpura and Verkhratsky, 2012). Subsequently, Camillo Golgi and Ramon y Cajal with the development of novel histological stains illustrated several astrocytes with their elaborated processes (García-Marín et al., 2007; Navarrete and Araque, 2014). Conventionally, two major classes of astrocytes have been distinguished in histological sections of the central nervous system (CNS) based on their morphology and distribution, the fibrous and protoplasmic astrocytes (Miller and Raff, 1984). The fibrous astrocytes are located mainly in white matter with few straight and long processes. Their processes are long (up to 300 μm), though much less elaborate as compared to protoplasmic astroglia. The protoplasmic astrocytes are mainly found in gray matter and are characterized by their extremely elaborate morphology with many branching processes yielding a “bushy” or “spongiform” appearance. Protoplasmic astrocytes extend their endfeet to blood vessels and enwrap them to form the glial limiting membrane, which is the outermost wall of the blood–brain barrier (BBB). More recently, the emergence of molecular approaches such as RNA-sequencing and proteomic analysis has revealed a much larger degree of astrocytic heterogeneity across various brain regions. Excellent reviews related to this topic can be found elsewhere (Zhang and Barres, 2010; Farmer and Murai, 2017; Miller, 2018; Xin and Bonci, 2018; Matias et al., 2019).
Astrocytes customarily have been identified using the intermediary filament protein Glial Fibrillary Acid Protein (GFAP) as a histological marker (Shehab et al., 1990; Zhang et al., 2019; ; Jurga et al., 2021). Other markers such as the enzyme glutamine synthetase or a Ca2+ binding peptide S100 have also been applied (Norenberg, 1979; Gonçalves et al., 2008). Transcriptome analysis of purified astrocytes identified novel molecular markers for astrocytes such as aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1 member L1 () or the transcription factor Sox9 (Sun et al., 2017).
Electrophysiologically, astrocytes are characterized by their lack of voltage-gated conductances, displaying a quasi-linear voltage-current relationship (Stevens and Wang, 1995). The expression of large amounts of inwardly rectifying potassium channels confers astrocytes with their characteristic low input resistance and membrane potential close to the equilibrium potential for transmembrane potassium. The principal potassium channels are the weakly inwardly rectifying Kir4.1 channels (Nwaobi et al., 2016) although other potassium channels such as the two-pore domain TWIK-1 and TREK-1 channels are also likely to be expressed in astrocytes (Zhou et al., 2009). Another major conductance found in astrocytes is the connexin channel such as connexin 43 which provides gap junctional coupling among astrocytes (Nagy and Rash, 2000). This gap junctional coupling allows the intercellular passive diffusion of endogenous signaling molecules, such as inositol (1,4,5)-triphosphate (IP3) (Leybaert et al., 1998), as well as glucose and its metabolites, glutamate, glutamine, and lactate (Medina et al., 1999). Therefore, astrocytes are considered to form a functional network of communicating cells.
Astrocytes also express various transporter proteins on the plasma membrane for the uptake of neurotransmitters. Transporters are vital for the normal CNS physiology by maintaining neurotransmitter homeostasis and modulating synaptic transmission. It is estimated that astrocytes remove about 80% of the glutamate released, whereas the remaining 20% is taken up by neurons (Parpura and Verkhratsky, 2012). Astrocytes remove extracellular glutamate by excitatory amino acid transporters (EAAT). Five types of EAATs are present in the human brain; the EAAT1 and EAAT2 are expressed almost exclusively in astrocytes (the rodent analogs are known as glutamate/aspartate transporter, GLAST, and glutamate transporter-1, GLT-1) (Murphy-Royal et al., 2017; Mahmoud et al., 2019).
Studies in the past few years have shown that astrocytes are spatially organized to form exquisite tridimensional structures (Gavrilov et al., 2018; Refaeli et al., 2021; ). Reconstruction of protoplasmic astrocyte assemblies in the rat hippocampus showed that astrocyte cell bodies are evenly spaced, and their processes overlap only minimally creating a “tiling” of astrocytes (; Ogata and Kosaka, 2002). This may be the case in some other brain regions as well (Halassa et al., 2007) though overlap of astrocyte territories have also been described (López-Hidalgo et al., 2016). Perhaps even more surprising is how a single astrocyte with its large territory and complex morphology can massively interact with a neuronal network. Indeed, a single astrocyte in the rat hippocampus is estimated to occupy a territory of 66,000 μm3 of neuropil and contact over 140,000 synapses ().
As discussed above, the role of astrocytes in promoting neurotransmitter clearance at synapses has long been recognized. A more unconventional role of astrocytes at synapses has emerged in the last three decades. The deployment of calcium imaging techniques in cultured cells and in brain slices provided evidence that when neurons communicate with each other they also signal to astrocytes. In turn, astrocytes respond to this neuronal signaling by releasing various neuroactive substances, mentioned in detailed in the section below, such as ATP, glutamate, D-serine, and GABA. Thus, the astrocytes form the third element at the synapses. Not only the information flows from presynaptic to postsynaptic elements but also streams to astrocytes that, in turn, regulate synaptic communication. This intimate morphological and functional association of astroglial processes in a synapse led to the conceptual term of a “tripartite synapse” (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
Astrocytic Ca2+ excitability
The plasticity of neuronal connectivity requires dynamic cooperation between neurons and astrocytes (). Astrocytes change their morphology and synaptic coverage to scale synaptic strength and modulate neuronal circuit activity (Gómez-Gonzalo et al., 2017; Verkhratsky and Nedergaard, 2018; Henneberger et al., 2020; Semyanov and Verkhratsky, 2021). Although not electrically excitable, astrocytes display complex intracellular Ca2+ pathways as a major component of astrocytic signaling. Interaction between synapses and astrocytic arborization promotes astrocyte Ca2+ events to modulate astrocyte neurotransmitter and K+ uptake, the release of neuroactive molecules (Wang et al., 2012; Zorec et al., 2012; ), and regulation of local blood flow (Petzold and Murthy, 2011; MacVicar and Newman, 2015). Astrocyte Ca2+ events manifest differentially in space and time within single astrocytes and across astrocytic networks (Semyanov et al., 2020). In soma and primary branches, Ca2+ events are primarily initiated by intracellular Ca2+ release from Ca2+ stores in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria (Verkhratsky et al., 2018). Moreover, astrocytic Ca2+ transients mainly have also been suggested to occur by Ca2+ entry through the plasma membrane following Na+ increases during neurotransmitter uptake via the sodium/calcium exchanger (NCX) (Verkhratsky et al., 2018) or after activation of other ionotropic Ca2+ permeable receptors and transient receptor potential channels (Shigetomi et al., 2011, 2013; Shibasaki et al., 2014; Rakers and Petzold, 2017).
In contrast to neurons, astrocytes contain processes with distinct morphology and complement organelles that generate widely distributed Ca2+ loci that allow them to differentially respond to synaptic activity and integrate multiple synaptic inputs (Perea and Araque, 2005; ; Semyanov et al., 2020). Astrocytic branches are intermingled with neuronal structures and contain Ca2+ stores that can trigger and amplify Ca2+ events by activation of inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate receptors (IP3Rs). IP3Rs are synergistically modulated by IP3 and Ca2+ levels and further Ca2+-dependent phospholipase C activation, stimulating Ca2+ release from the ER (Foskett et al., 2007; Khakh and Sofroniew, 2015). Ca2+ levels can also reach the threshold for activation of IP3Rs by activation of plasmalemmal G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) (Semyanov and Verkhratsky, 2021) and via increased diffusion of Ca2+ from multiple daughter leaflets (Semyanov, 2019). Intracellular Ca2+ amplification between clusters of IP3Rs can propagate Ca2+ waves within the astrocyte cell body and further astrocytic branches (Srinivasan et al., 2015; Semyanov and Verkhratsky, 2021). Ca2+ event generation in leaflets can be additionally enhanced by ER-independent release mechanisms, involving Ca2+ efflux from mitochondria, in response to the transient opening of permeability transition pores (; Figure 1).
The analysis of the neurotransmitter-evoked astrocyte calcium dynamics has revealed that astrocytes integrate incoming synaptic information (Perea and Araque, 2005; Shigetomi et al., 2008). Indeed, synaptic action of excitatory or inhibitory neurotransmitters evoke non-linear calcium elevations and result in the control of the spatial propagation of the intracellular calcium signal within the astrocyte (Perea and Araque, 2005; Shigetomi et al., 2008; Mariotti et al., 2016; ; Liu et al., 2022), which is indicative of synaptic information processing by astrocytes. The control of the spatial extent of the calcium signal may have important functional consequences, as it may regulate the spatial extention of the gliotransmitter release and the consequent synaptic regulation (). Moreover, converging Ca2+ signals from multiple daughter leaflets can be finally integrated by parent branches as a readout of local network activity (Lock et al., 2019). In some circumstances, propagating Ca2+ waves can spread through astrocytes and the astrocytic network to influence neuronal activity. This pathway has been suggested to guide information processing across neuronal networks (Tong et al., 2013; Semyanov and Verkhratsky, 2021). Ca2+ events are terminated by Ca2+ removal through the plasma membrane by Ca2+ ATPase (PCMA) or by uptake to Ca2+ stores by ER calcium ATPase (SERCA) (). Elongated mitochondria in astrocytic branchlets can also actively uptake intracellular Ca2+ by mitochondria Ca2+ uniporters (Zhang and Ding, 2018).
Heterogeneity of astrocytic Ca2+ signals
Astrocytic Ca2+ events can be classified as either spontaneous or neurotransmitter-evoked (Khakh and McCarthy, 2015; Semyanov et al., 2020). Spontaneous events are characterized by intrinsic Ca2+ fluctuations that can occur in the absence of external signals (Nett et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2006). These spontaneous Ca2+ oscillations persist even if neuronal firing or neuronal and astrocytic vesicular release is blocked (Wang et al., 2006; Sun et al., 2014). Even though the precise mechanisms mediating the triggering of spontaneous Ca2+ transients are not completely understood, it has been proposed that they can be the result of stochastic Ca2+ fluxes through simultaneous multiple pathways (; ). These mechanisms involve both entering Ca2+ from the extracellular space through Ca2+ permeable receptors, Ca2+ channels, and Na+/Ca2+ exchangers at the plasma membrane or intracellular Ca2+ stores through IP3Rs on the ER and mitochondrial permeability via transition pores (Rungta et al., 2016; ; Wu et al., 2019). The addition of small spatially determined Ca2+ events stimulates local cytosolic Ca2+ oscillations that can trigger Ca2+-dependent Ca2+ release via activation of IP3Rs, leading to amplification and propagation of Ca2+ events (Khakh and McCarthy, 2015). The magnitude of spontaneous Ca2+ activity can be influenced by the intrinsic activity of Gq GPCRs, which stimulates sufficient levels of IP3 to activate IP3Rs, or by focal points of elevated Ca2+ which acts as a co-agonist of IP3Rs. Ca2+ fluxes can be further strengthened or weakened depending on cellular energy states, changes in membrane potential, surface-to-volume ratio, and ER depletion (Khakh and McCarthy, 2015; ; Stobart et al., 2018). In soma and primary branches, intracellular Ca2+ waves will mobilize in a specific spatial path within the cell, depending on the proximity of ER IP3Rs, further distance from IP3Rs will terminate the cascade and buffer Ca2+ to basal levels ().
Astrocytic calcium signals in the soma and processes
Astrocytic Ca2+ signals are considered to rely mainly on the IP3R pathway, especially in the soma and primary branches, as genetic deletion of IP3R2, which is known to be enriched in astrocytes, reduces spontaneous Ca2+ oscillations with the complete abolition of Ca2+ signals in astrocytic soma. Residual Ca2+ activity in astrocyte processes, even if reduced, is still persistent in astrocytes of IP3R2–/– mice (Kanemaru et al., 2014), suggesting IP3R-independent Ca2+ release mechanisms, especially in processes (Patrushev et al., 2013). Such mechanisms involve low cytosolic Ca2+ elevations in mitochondria (; Okubo et al., 2019) and transmembrane Ca2+ fluxes mediated by transient receptor potential ion channels (TRPA1), that contribute to the maintenance of basal Ca2+ levels within astrocytes (Shigetomi et al., 2010, 2011). Importantly, 80% of the astrocyte Ca2+ activity in vivo takes place in astrocytic ramifications, that account for 75% of astrocytic volume (). Spatial restriction of spontaneous Ca2+ events has been reported in ex vivo and in vivo preparations. Such events occur predominantly in distal parts of astrocyte processes and do not propagate to the soma, thereby identifying autonomous functional domains called “microdomains” (Grosche et al., 1999; Lia et al., 2021). High-resolution imaging techniques have allowed a deeper understanding of the distinct properties and mechanisms underlying astrocyte somatic and microdomain Ca2+ activity. While somatic Ca2+ increases can be triggered by intense neuronal firing patterns, astrocytic processes also respond to local levels of synaptic activity, suggesting compartmentalized astrocyte neuronal communication integration. Microdomain Ca2+ oscillations are more frequently observed than somatic ones and occur asynchronously in various processes (Volterra et al., 2014). Microdomain Ca2+ events have been deferentially categorized based on their distinct properties, however, a rich diversity of Ca2+ signals are present within single astrocytes and are modulated by local brain environments in distinct brain areas (Shigetomi et al., 2013; Khakh and Sofroniew, 2015). Previous elegant classifications have distinguished microdomain Ca2+ activity in focal and expanded microdomains (; ). Focal microdomains, also later referred to in the field, as localized microdomains in branches and branchlets (Khakh and Sofroniew, 2015), depend largely on IP3R-dependent Ca2+ transients and seem to be independent of neuronal firing. A distinct hypothesis has suggested that these events could originate from spontaneous neurotransmitter release at neighboring synapses, potentially contributing to plastic adaptations at the tripartite synapse (; ).
On the other hand, expanded microdomains present different Ca2+ dynamics, compared to focal events, with larger amplitude, duration, and spatial extent, and are highly sensitive to surrounding neuronal firing. The increased magnitude of these Ca2+ events has been suggested to result from the synchronization of several autonomous microdomains and might represent a more coordinated Ca2+ response that could modulate gliotransmitter release probability (; Panatier et al., 2011; Volterra et al., 2014).
Astrocytic calcium signaling in response to neuronal activity
Astrocytes sense, react and modify the extracellular transmitter homeostasis by responding in situ to neuronal activity. Ex vivo and in vivo examinations have provided strong evidence showing that neuronal inputs trigger astrocyte Ca2+ events by activation of multiple plasma membrane receptors (Nimmerjahn et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2006; ; Figure 1). Engagement of distinct receptor arrays after neuronal input increases cytosolic IP3 levels and IP3R activation, promoting Ca2+ release from ER Ca2+ stores (). Additional Ca2+ entry to the cytosol and further triggering of Ca2+ transients can be observed after neuronal-mediated activation of ionotropic receptors, such as glutamate AMPA and NMDA (Saab et al., 2012), purinergic P2X (), and nicotinic cholinergic receptors () or after uptake of glutamate and GABA via Na+ influx via Na+/Ca2+ exchangers (; ; Rose et al., 2020). Evidence collected through the last decades has shown that astrocyte GPCR activation mainly leads to intracellular Ca2+ increases (Kofuji and Araque, 2021). Such a dynamic seems to oppose canonical responses observed in neuronal activation, as increases in astrocytic intracellular Ca2+ are triggered after activation of excitatory or inhibitory transmitter receptors (Mariotti et al., 2016; Perea et al., 2016) or other Gq, Gs, or Gi-coupled metabotropic receptors (; Yu et al., 2020). The consequences of GPCR-mediated increase in astrocytic Ca2+ are not fully characterized, however, exciting evidence has suggested that astrocytes can discriminate and integrate metabotropic signaling upstream of internal Ca2+ oscillations (). Different activation efficiencies of GPCRs exert equivalent (Shigetomi et al., 2008) or do not necessarily induce the release of gliotransmitters, contrary to the effects observed after Ca2+ uncaging or IP3 application (Wang et al., 2013).
Neuronal influence on astrocytic activity can occur at individual synapses but also after diffusion of neuromodulators, such as dopamine, acetylcholine, serotonin, and noradrenaline, that modulate spatiotemporal spontaneous Ca2+ events that trigger new Ca2+ fluctuations (Takata et al., 2011; ; Jennings et al., 2017; ; Semyanov et al., 2020). Evidence collected during the last decades has suggested that the modulation of astrocyte intracellular Ca2+-induced by neuromodulators finely tunes K+ homeostasis and gliotransmitter release (Wang et al., 2012; Pacholko et al., 2020). By integrating the neuromodulatory effects, astrocytes act as crucial players in behavioral states. Neuromodulator effects have been especially evident in astrocyte Ca2+ network activity, as they influence astrocyte activity thresholds in response to local neuronal activity or depending on the brain’s vigilance state (; ). Astrocyte Ca2+ events in leaflets and branchlets can also be triggered by gliotransmitters or other diffuse signals in the local environment, as well as by changes in partial pressures of CO2 and O2, osmotic pressure, pH, and temperature (; Turovsky et al., 2016; Kofuji and Araque, 2021; Semyanov and Verkhratsky, 2021). Astrocytic Ca2+ activity resulting from the interaction between astrocytic processes and synapses can trigger astrocyte morphological remodeling and gliotransmitter release, which feedback to neuronal network excitability and functioning (Kofuji and Araque, 2021).
Kinetics of astrocyte Ca2+ signals
Astrocyte Ca2+ signals in response to external stimulation present different temporal and spatial properties than neuronal activity. The timescale of astrocytic Ca2+ dynamics is generally much slower, with variable intervals between sensory stimulation and the onset of astrocytic Ca2+ event. Single action potentials that can last within a range of a few milliseconds differentiate from astrocytic Ca2+ events, as they can occur over durations of several hundred milliseconds to a few seconds (Paukert et al., 2014; Otsu et al., 2015). The differences in Ca2+ dynamics between neurons and astrocytes have raised the question of whether the astrocytic activity can be directly correlated to real-time information processing in the brain (Semyanov, 2019; Semyanov et al., 2020). Astrocyte information processing could potentially bridge information received by thousands of synapses belonging to different circuits and neurons and integrate the information in different spatial-temporal scales (; Perea and Araque, 2005; Halassa et al., 2007; Gordon et al., 2008). Indeed, recent evidence suggests that astrocytes could encode information by evoking specific time and spatial Ca2+ signal patterns, characterized by the different total area of appearance, number, and duration of Ca2+ events (Perea and Araque, 2005; Volterra et al., 2014; Nakayama et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2019).
Moreover, during information processing, astrocytes could incorporate not only, neuronal information, but also signals resulting from complex interactions with other non-neuronal cells and non-cellular elements part of the extracellular brain microenvironment (Volterra et al., 2014; Ribot et al., 2021; Semyanov and Verkhratsky, 2021). Further investigation is needed to elucidate the emerging complexity of mechanisms and dynamics mediating specific types of astrocytic Ca2+ patterns and astrocyte processing of information.
Calcium and gliotransmitter release from astrocytes
Since the coining of the term, “tripartite synapse,” researchers have been studying the extent that astrocytes actively communicate with neurons (, ). One of the active mechanisms of astrocytes that impacts synaptic transmission is gliotransmission (). Gliotransmission refers to the capacity of astrocytes to release neuroactive molecules that impact synaptic transmission or neuronal signaling (; Volterra et al., 2014). Many of these signaling molecules include classic transmitters such as glutamate and GABA and amino acids like ATP/adenosine and d-serine. Even though the cellular and molecular mechanisms mediating gliotransmitter release are not completely understood, several studies have revealed both calcium-dependent and -independent release mechanisms (Guček et al., 2012; Li et al., 2013; Sloan and Barres, 2014; Figure 2).
FIGURE 2
Glutamate
Calcium-dependent and -independent mechanisms for glutamate release from astrocytes have been proposed. These include (a) exocytosis from vesicles, (b) anion channel opening, (c) glutamate exchange via cystine-glutamate antiporter, (d) release from hemichannels, or (e) ionotropic purinergic receptors (; Montana et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2004; Malarkey and Parpura, 2008). Vesicular gliotransmitter release of glutamate has been supported by morphological and functional evidence. For example, it has been shown that astrocytes possess some of the proteins involved in exocytosis, including the soluble N-ethyl maleimide-sensitive fusion protein attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complex (Zhang et al., 2004), to control vesicle fusion. SNARE proteins, such as VAMP2 or VAMP3, Syntaxin 1, SNAP23, and synaptotagmin isoforms have been detected in astrocytes (; Mielnicka and Michaluk, 2021). Interestingly, the mechanisms involved in glutamate-mediated exocytosis have been highly debated in the last years (Li et al., 2008; ). Functionally, expression in astrocytes with the light chain of tetanus toxin that selectively cleaves the vesicle-associated SNARE protein potently inhibits the release of glutamate from astrocytes (Montana et al., 2004; Xu et al., 2007; ). However, complementary evidence has questioned the exact mechanisms involved in Ca2+-dependent glutamate exocytosis (Li et al., 2008; ). Deployment of a variety of experimental approaches revealed that fusion events from astrocytic vesicles following intracellular calcium increase occurs in a much slower time scale in comparison to neurons (; ; Marchaland et al., 2008). While in neurons the fusion occurs in less than 0.5 ms following calcium increase, in astrocytes the exocytotic release takes place over two orders of magnitude slower (; ; Marchaland et al., 2008; Südhof, 2012). The release of glutamate may also occur via the opening of glutamate-permeable, two-pore domain potassium channel TREK-1 or the opening of glutamate-permeable, calcium-activated bestrophin anion channel (Best1). Ultrastructural analyses demonstrate that TREK-1 is preferentially localized at cell body and processes, whereas Best1 is mostly found in microdomains of astrocytes near synapses (Woo et al., 2012). Recent evidence has also shown that activation of volume-regulated anion channels (VRAC) can lead to glutamate release. When this channel is activated by cell swelling, astrocytes in the hippocampus release glutamate (Yang et al., 2019). Lastly, glutamate may also be released via hemichannels which can be blocked by drugs targeting synaptic vesicle protein 2A (Okada et al., 2021).
GABA
GABA is an important neurotransmitter for neuronal inhibition. As neurons, astrocytes can also release GABA via transporters, anion channels, and gap junction channels (Yoon and Lee, 2014). In contrast to glutamate, GABA release from astrocytes has been reported to be mediated by distinct mechanisms, as the vesicular release of GABA seems unlikely, due to the lack of GABA-containing vesicles in astrocytes. Atypically, astrocytes synthesize GABA from the polyamine putrescine using monoamine oxidase B (Yoon and Lee, 2014). Early examples of GABA release from astrocytes have been found in the olfactory bulb, thalamus, and hippocampus (Kozlov et al., 2006; Jiménez-González et al., 2011; Le Meur et al., 2012). One of the major functional consequences of astrocyte-derived GABA is the tonic inhibition of various neuronal circuits. Various mechanisms of GABA release from astrocytes have been proposed. Calcium-dependent GABA release from astrocytes potentially involving the GABA transporter GAT has been reported in the dorsal root ganglia (). Other mechanisms for GABA release from astrocytes such as Best anion channels and gap Junction hemichannels have also been described. “Sniffer-patch” experiments have shown that the Best-1-mediated release of GABA is dependent on intracellular calcium and is triggered by GPCR activation. Tonic inhibition caused by GABA release via glial Best1 anion channels has been reported in the cerebellum and thalamus (Lee et al., 2010; Kwak et al., 2020). This mechanism has also been demonstrated in reactive astrocytes in the hippocampus (Pandit et al., 2020). Finally, gap junction hemichannels could be another route by which GABA can be released from astrocytes. GABA release via gap junction hemichannels is involved in the regulation of tonic GABA currents of neurons in cultured hippocampal neurons and acute hippocampal slices (Ransom et al., 2017).
ATP
ATP is a primary energy source in cells and also acts as an important messenger molecule through action on purinergic receptors. ATP plays an important role in calcium wave propagation in astrocytes (). Unlike the previously mentioned gliotransmitters, the mechanism for exocytosis was unclear in situ until recent years. This was due primarily to using indirect assays to measure quantal and non-quantal ATP release (Xiong et al., 2018). Many studies have examined calcium-dependent and independent mechanisms of ATP release. Evidence collected from mice conditionally expressing the SNARE domain of VAMP2 selectively in astrocytes (dn-SNARE mice), has shown Ca2+-dependent ATP release by astrocytes (Lalo et al., 2014). In addition, ATP release can be mediated by calcium-dependent lysosome exocytosis (Pangršič et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2007). Lysosome exocytosis and ATP release occurred after mechanical stimulation in primary hippocampal astrocyte culture (Xiong et al., 2018) in a calcium-dependent manner (Lee et al., 2015). In addition, ATP can also be released via connexin 43 (Cx43) hemichannels and anion channels (Kang et al., 2008; Fujii et al., 2017).
D-serine
Astrocytes can produce and store D-serine in vesicles (Martineau et al., 2013; Sild and Van Horn, 2013). The enzyme, serine racemase converts L-serine to D-serine (Wolosker et al., 1999). Astrocytes play an important role in the serine shuttle by converting L-serine from glucose which can then supply to neurons (Herman, 2018). Ca2+ dependent vesicle release of D-serine has been demonstrated to modulate long-term potentiation (LTP) (Henneberger et al., 2010; ). Astrocytic glutamate activates on mGluRs and further activates LTP in cholinergic neurons (Navarrete et al., 2012). Moreover, astrocyte release of D-serine also leads to LTP modulating recognition memory (Robin et al., 2018). Glial D-serine is relevant for astrocytes across multiple species including Drosophila. In Drosophila, glial D-serine is required for thirst-directed behavior (Park et al., 2022). Many studies have shown that astrocytes can release D-serine under pathological conditions. For instance, preventing the release of d-serine from glia reduce synaptic damage after traumatic brain injury (Tapanes et al., 2022). Astroglial d-serine can also travel through Cx43 hemichannels. The form of release is particularly important for fear memories during fear conditioning. Blocking Cx43 in the basolateral amygdala impaired fear memory consolidation (Linsambarth et al., 2022). In addition, astrocytes can also release D-serine via Best1 channels. This has been shown to alter NMDA tone in the hippocampus (Koh et al., 2022).
Conclusion
The development of tools for visualization and manipulation of cell Ca2+ dynamics together with advances in imaging techniques have enabled the monitoring and modulation of astrocyte Ca2+ signaling in in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo preparations (Li et al., 2013). Advanced optical imaging techniques, sensitive genetically encoded Ca2+ indicators (GECIs), and optogenetic and pharmacogenetic tools allow the selective measuring and activation of astrocyte Ca2+ signaling pathways to study astrocyte-neuron communication, mechanisms of gliotransmitter release, and role of astrocytes in physiology (Li et al., 2013; Semyanov et al., 2020). In particular, selective astrocyte GPCR activation has been useful to explore the functional role of astrocyte Ca2+ signaling in specific brain areas and astrocyte populations (Losi et al., 2017). A variety of experimental approaches are now available to increase astrocyte intracellular Ca2+ levels, such as light-gated glutamate receptor, channelrhodopsin-based effectors, melanopsin, optoXRs, and designer receptor exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) (Hirbec et al., 2020). In particular, Gq-GPCR and Gi-GPCR DREADDs have been widely used in the field, as they offer an opportunity for non-invasive and selective in vivo activation of astrocyte GPCR pathways after selective agonist administration (Losi et al., 2017). Even though there is a variety of tools to increase astrocyte Ca2+ signaling, till recently, IP3R2–/– mice and IP3 sponges (; Petravicz et al., 2008) have been the only available options to achieve astrocyte Ca2+ selective attenuation. Recent studies have provided new tools to lessen intracellular Ca2+ release, such as activation of kappa-opioid receptor coupled to a Gi-GPCR selectively activated by salvinorin B (Vardy et al., 2015; Herrera Moro Chao et al., 2022) or by Cre-dependent expression of hPMCA2, a human plasma membrane Ca2+ ATPase pump that constitutively extrudes Ca2+ from astrocytes (Yu et al., 2018, 2021). Decreases in astrocyte intracellular Ca2+ levels have also been observed during neuropathology after astrocyte Gs-GPCR activation (Pham et al., 2021).
The evolving genetically targeted optical and pharmacological tools to modulate astrocytic Ca2+ signals have been of value in several studies in the field, showing that astrocyte function and astrocyte-neuron communication is heavily impacted during pathological conditions (Nedergaard et al., 2010; Nanclares et al., 2021; Herrera Moro Chao et al., 2022). Visualization of astrocyte Ca2+ by GECIs monitoring has shown that astrocytes become hyperactive in many neurological diseases such as traumatic brain injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, epilepsy, and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Shigetomi et al., 2019). In addition, modified gliotransmitter release and synaptic transmission have been associated with the development of astrocyte hyperactivity and reactivity (Nedergaard et al., 2010; Nanclares et al., 2021; Herrera Moro Chao et al., 2022). In conclusion, further studies are essential for a precise understanding of the detailed mechanisms by which astrocyte-neuron communication mediates physiological outputs and how the dysregulation of this reciprocal communication affects the development of neuropathology. Tailoring novel molecular tools that specifically modulate astrocyte Ca2+ signaling pathways combined with advanced Ca2+ imaging techniques in vivo will further shed light on the complexity of astrocyte-neuron bidirectional communication and its impact on physiology.
Statements
Author contributions
JG, AA, PK, and DH drafted manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was funded by National Institutes of Health-NINDS (R01DA048822, R01MH119355, and 1F31NS124107-01A1 to JG).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbbracchioM.VerderioC. (2006). Pathophysiological roles of P2 receptors in glial cells.Novartis Found Symp.27691–103.
2
AgarwalA.WuP.HughesE.FukayaM.TischfieldM.LangsethA.et al (2017). Transient opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore induces microdomain calcium transients in astrocyte processes.Neuron93587–605.e7. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.034
3
AgulhonC.PetraviczJ.McMullenA.SwegerE.MintonS.TavesS.et al (2008). What is the role of astrocyte calcium in neurophysiology?Neuron59932–946. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.004
4
AllenN.ErogluC. (2017). Cell biology of astrocyte-synapse interactions.Neuron96697–708. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.09.056
5
AngelovaP.KasymovV.ChristieI.SheikhbahaeiS.TurovskyE.MarinaN.et al (2015). Functional oxygen sensitivity of astrocytes.J. Neurosci.3510460–10473. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0045-15.2015
6
AraqueA.CarmignotoG.HaydonP.OlietS.RobitailleR.VolterraA. (2014). Gliotransmitters travel in time and space.Neuron81728–739. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.007
7
AraqueA.LiN.DoyleR.HaydonP. G. (2000). SNARE protein-dependent glutamate release from astrocytes.J. Neurosci.20666–673. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-02-00666.2000
8
AraqueA.SanzgiriR.ParpuraV.HaydonP. (1998). Calcium elevation in astrocytes causes an NMDA receptor-dependent increase in the frequency of miniature synaptic currents in cultured hippocampal neurons.J. Neurosci.186822–6829. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-17-06822.1998
9
AryalS.FuX.SandinJ.NeupaneK.LakesJ.GradyM.et al (2021). Nicotine induces morphological and functional changes in astrocytes via nicotinic receptor activity.Glia692037–2053. 10.1002/glia.24011
10
AtenS.KiyoshiC.ArzolaE.PattersonJ.TaylorA.DuY.et al (2022). Ultrastructural view of astrocyte arborization, astrocyte-astrocyte and astrocyte-synapse contacts, intracellular vesicle-like structures, and mitochondrial network.Prog. Neurobiol.213:102264. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102264
11
BatiukM.MartirosyanA.WahisJ.de VinF.MarneffeC.KusserowC.et al (2020). Identification of region-specific astrocyte subtypes at single cell resolution.Nat. Commun.11:1220. 10.1038/s41467-019-14198-8
12
BazarganiN.AttwellD. (2016). Astrocyte calcium signaling: The third wave.Nat. Neurosci.19182–189. 10.1038/nn.4201
13
BergersenL.MorlandC.OrmelL.RinholmJ.LarssonM.WoldJ.et al (2012). Immunogold detection of L-glutamate and D-serine in small synaptic-like microvesicles in adult hippocampal astrocytes.Cereb. Cortex221690–1697. 10.1093/cercor/bhr254
14
BernardinelliY.RandallJ.JanettE.NikonenkoI.KönigS.JonesE.et al (2014). Activity-dependent structural plasticity of perisynaptic astrocytic domains promotes excitatory synapse stability.Curr. Biol.241679–1688. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.025
15
BezziP.GundersenV.GalbeteJ.SeifertG.SteinhäuserC.PilatiE.et al (2004). Astrocytes contain a vesicular compartment that is competent for regulated exocytosis of glutamate.Nat. Neurosci.7613–620. 10.1038/nn1246
16
BezziP.VolterraA. (2001). A neuron-glia signalling network in the active brain.Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.11387–394. 10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00223-3
17
BindocciE.SavtchoukI.LiaudetN.BeckerD.CarrieroG.VolterraA. (2017). Three-dimensional Ca2+ imaging advances understanding of astrocyte biology.Science356eaai8185. 10.1126/science.aai8185
18
BoddumK.JensenT.MagloireV.KristiansenU.RusakovD.PavlovI.et al (2016). Astrocytic GABA transporter activity modulates excitatory neurotransmission.Nat. Commun.7:13572. 10.1038/ncomms13572
19
BohmbachK.SchwarzM.SchochS.HennebergerC. (2018). The structural and functional evidence for vesicular release from astrocytes in situ.Brain Res. Bull.13665–75. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2017.01.015
20
BrazheA.VerisokinA.VerveykoD.PostnovD. (2018). Sodium-calcium exchanger can account for regenerative Ca2+ entry in thin astrocyte processes.Front. Cell Neurosci.12:250. 10.3389/fncel.2018.00250
21
BushongE.MartoneM.JonesY.EllismanM. (2002). Protoplasmic astrocytes in CA1 stratum radiatum occupy separate anatomical domains.J. Neurosci.22183–192. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-01-00183.2002
22
CahoyJ.EmeryB.KaushalA.FooL.ZamanianJ.ChristophersonK.et al (2008). A transcriptome database for astrocytes, neurons, and oligodendrocytes: A new resource for understanding brain development and function.J. Neurosci.28264–278. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4178-07.2008
23
CalìC.MarchalandJ.RegazziR.BezziP. (2008). SDF 1-alpha (CXCL12) triggers glutamate exocytosis from astrocytes on a millisecond time scale: Imaging analysis at the single-vesicle level with TIRF microscopy.J. Neuroimmunol.19882–91. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.04.015
24
CaudalL.GobboD.SchellerA.KirchhoffF. (2020). The Paradox of Astroglial Ca2 + Signals at the Interface of Excitation and Inhibition.Front. Cell Neurosci.14:609947. 10.3389/fncel.2020.609947
25
ChaiH.Diaz-CastroB.ShigetomiE.MonteE.OcteauJ.YuX.et al (2017). Neural circuit-specialized astrocytes: Transcriptomic, proteomic, morphological, and functional evidence.Neuron95531–549.e9. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.029
26
ChristensenR.Delgado-LezamaR.RussoR.LindB.AlcocerE.RathM.et al (2018). Spinal dorsal horn astrocytes release GABA in response to synaptic activation.J. Physiol.5964983–4994. 10.1113/JP276562
27
ClarkeL.BarresB. (2013). Emerging roles of astrocytes in neural circuit development.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.14311–321. 10.1038/nrn3484
28
CorkrumM.CoveloA.LinesJ.BellocchioL.PisanskyM.LokeK.et al (2020). Dopamine-evoked synaptic regulation in the nucleus accumbens requires astrocyte activity.Neuron1051036–1047.e5. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.026
29
DenizotA.ArizonoM.NägerlU.SoulaH.BerryH. (2019). Simulation of calcium signaling in fine astrocytic processes: Effect of spatial properties on spontaneous activity.PLoS Comput. Biol.15:e1006795. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006795
30
Di CastroM.ChuquetJ.LiaudetN.BhaukaurallyK.SantelloM.BouvierD.et al (2011). Local Ca2+ detection and modulation of synaptic release by astrocytes.Nat. Neurosci.141276–1284. 10.1038/nn.2929
31
DingF.O’DonnellJ.ThraneA.ZeppenfeldD.KangH.XieL.et al (2013). α1-Adrenergic receptors mediate coordinated Ca2+ signaling of cortical astrocytes in awake, behaving mice.Cell Calcium54387–394. 10.1016/j.ceca.2013.09.001
32
DingX.ZhangX.JiL. (2018). Contribution of calcium fluxes to astrocyte spontaneous calcium oscillations in deterministic and stochastic models.Appl. Math. Model.55371–382.
33
DurkeeC.AraqueA. (2019). Diversity and specificity of astrocyte-neuron communication.Neuroscience39673–78. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.11.010
34
FarmerW.MuraiK. (2017). Resolving astrocyte heterogeneity in the CNS.Front. Cell Neurosci.11:300. 10.3389/fncel.2017.00300
35
FoskettJ.WhiteC.CheungK.MakD. (2007). Inositol trisphosphate receptor Ca2+ release channels.Physiol. Rev.87593–658. 10.1152/physrev.00035.2006
36
FujiiY.MaekawaS.MoritaM. (2017). Astrocyte calcium waves propagate proximally by gap junction and distally by extracellular diffusion of ATP released from volume-regulated anion channels.Sci. Rep.7:13115. 10.1038/s41598-017-13243-0
37
García-MarínV.García-LópezP.FreireM. (2007). Cajal’s contributions to glia research.Trends Neurosci.30479–487. 10.1016/j.tins.2007.06.008
38
GavrilovN.GolyaginaI.BrazheA.ScimemiA.TurlapovV.SemyanovA. (2018). Astrocytic coverage of dendritic spines, dendritic shafts, and axonal boutons in hippocampal neuropil.Front. Cell Neurosci.12:248. 10.3389/fncel.2018.00248
39
Gómez-GonzaloM.Martin-FernandezM.Martínez-MurilloR.MederosS.Hernández-VivancoA.JamisonS.et al (2017). Neuron-astrocyte signaling is preserved in the aging brain.Glia65569–580. 10.1002/glia.23112
40
GonçalvesC.LeiteM.NardinP. (2008). Biological and methodological features of the measurement of S100B, a putative marker of brain injury.Clin. Biochem.41755–763. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.04.003
41
GordonG.ChoiH.RungtaR.Ellis-DaviesG.MacVicarB. (2008). Brain metabolism dictates the polarity of astrocyte control over arterioles.Nature456745–749. 10.1038/nature07525
42
GroscheJ.MatyashV.MöllerT.VerkhratskyA.ReichenbachA.KettenmannH. (1999). Microdomains for neuron-glia interaction: Parallel fiber signaling to Bergmann glial cells.Nat. Neurosci.2139–143. 10.1038/5692
43
GučekA.VardjanN.ZorecR. (2012). Exocytosis in astrocytes: Transmitter release and membrane signal regulation.Neurochem. Res.372351–2363. 10.1007/s11064-012-0773-6
44
HalassaM.FellinT.TakanoH.DongJ.HaydonP. (2007). Synaptic islands defined by the territory of a single astrocyte.J. Neurosci.276473–6477. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1419-07.2007
45
HennebergerC.BardL.PanatierA.ReynoldsJ.KopachO.MedvedevN.et al (2020). LTP induction boosts glutamate spillover by driving withdrawal of perisynaptic astroglia.Neuron108919–936.e11. 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.08.030
46
HennebergerC.PapouinT.OlietS.RusakovD. (2010). Long-term potentiation depends on release of D-serine from astrocytes.Nature463232–236. 10.1038/nature08673
47
HermanW. (2018). “The Neurobiology of d-Serine Signaling,” in Apprentices to Genius: A tribute to Solomon H. Snyder, edsCoyleJ.PasternakG. (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press).
48
Herrera Moro ChaoD.KirchnerM.PhamC.FoppenE.DenisR.CastelJ.et al (2022). Hypothalamic astrocytes control systemic glucose metabolism and energy balance.Cell Metab.341532–1547.e6. 10.1016/j.cmet.2022.09.002
49
HirbecH.DéglonN.FooL.GoshenI.GrutzendlerJ.HangenE.et al (2020). Emerging technologies to study glial cells.Glia681692–1728. 10.1002/glia.23780
50
JenningsA.TyurikovaO.BardL.ZhengK.SemyanovA.HennebergerC.et al (2017). Dopamine elevates and lowers astroglial Ca2+ through distinct pathways depending on local synaptic circuitry.Glia65447–459. 10.1002/glia.23103
51
Jiménez-GonzálezC.PirttimakiT.CopeD.ParriH. (2011). Non-neuronal, slow GABA signalling in the ventrobasal thalamus targets δ-subunit-containing GABA(A) receptors.Eur. J. Neurosci.331471–1482. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07645.x
52
JurgaA.PalecznaM.KadluczkaJ.KuterK. (2021). Beyond the GFAP-Astrocyte protein markers in the Brain.Biomolecules11:1361. 10.3390/biom11091361
53
KanemaruK.SekiyaH.XuM.SatohK.KitajimaN.YoshidaK.et al (2014). In vivo visualization of subtle, transient, and local activity of astrocytes using an ultrasensitive Ca(2+) indicator.Cell Rep.8311–318. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.05.056
54
KangJ.KangN.LovattD.TorresA.ZhaoZ.LinJ.et al (2008). Connexin 43 hemichannels are permeable to ATP.J. Neurosci.284702–4711. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5048-07.2008
55
KhakhB.McCarthyK. (2015). Astrocyte calcium signaling: From observations to functions and the challenges therein.Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.7:a020404. 10.1101/cshperspect.a020404
56
KhakhB.SofroniewM. (2015). Diversity of astrocyte functions and phenotypes in neural circuits.Nat. Neurosci.18942–952. 10.1038/nn.4043
57
KofujiP.AraqueA. (2021). G-Protein-Coupled Receptors in Astrocyte-Neuron Communication.Neuroscience45671–84. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.03.025
58
KohW.ParkM.ChunY.LeeJ.ShimH.ParkM.et al (2022). Astrocytes Render Memory Flexible by Releasing D-Serine and Regulating NMDA Receptor Tone in the Hippocampus.Biol. Psychiatry91740–752. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.10.012
59
KozlovA.AnguloM.AudinatE.CharpakS. (2006). Target cell-specific modulation of neuronal activity by astrocytes.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10310058–10063. 10.1073/pnas.0603741103
60
KwakH.KohW.KimS.SongK.ShinJ.LeeJ.et al (2020). Astrocytes control sensory acuity via tonic inhibition in the thalamus.Neuron108691–706.e10. 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.08.013
61
LaloU.PalyginO.Rasooli-NejadS.AndrewJ.HaydonP.PankratovY. (2014). Exocytosis of ATP from astrocytes modulates phasic and tonic inhibition in the neocortex.PLoS Biol.12:e1001747. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001747
62
Le MeurK.Mendizabal-ZubiagaJ.GrandesP.AudinatE. (2012). GABA release by hippocampal astrocytes.Front. Comput. Neurosci.6:59. 10.3389/fncom.2012.00059
63
LeeJ.ChunY.HanK.LeeJ.WooD.LeeC. (2015). Ca(2+) entry is required for mechanical stimulation-induced ATP Release from Astrocyte.Exp. Neurobiol.2417–23. 10.5607/en.2015.24.1.17
64
LeeS.YoonB.BerglundK.OhS.ParkH.ShinH.et al (2010). Channel-mediated tonic GABA release from glia.Science330790–796. 10.1126/science.1184334
65
LeybaertL.PaemeleireK.StrahonjaA.SandersonM. (1998). Inositol-trisphosphate-dependent intercellular calcium signaling in and between astrocytes and endothelial cells.Glia24398–407.
66
LiD.AgulhonC.SchmidtE.OheimM.RopertN. (2013). New tools for investigating astrocyte-to-neuron communication.Front. Cell Neurosci.7:193. 10.3389/fncel.2013.00193
67
LiD.RopertN.KoulakoffA.GiaumeC.OheimM. (2008). Lysosomes are the major vesicular compartment undergoing Ca2+-regulated exocytosis from cortical astrocytes.J. Neurosci.287648–7658. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0744-08.2008
68
LiaA.HenriquesV.ZontaM.ChiavegatoA.CarmignotoG.Gómez-GonzaloM.et al (2021). Calcium signals in astrocyte microdomains, a decade of great advances.Front. Cell Neurosci.15:673433. 10.3389/fncel.2021.673433
69
LinsambarthS.CarvajalF.Moraga-AmaroR.MendezL.TamburiniG.JimenezI.et al (2022). Astroglial gliotransmitters released via Cx43 hemichannels regulate NMDAR-dependent transmission and short-term fear memory in the basolateral amygdala.FASEB J.36:e22134. 10.1096/fj.202100798RR
70
LiuJ.FengX.WangY.XiaX.ZhengJ. (2022). Astrocytes: GABAceptive and GABAergic Cells in the Brain.Front. Cell Neurosci.16:892497. 10.3389/fncel.2022.892497
71
LockJ.SmithI.ParkerI. (2019). Spatial-temporal patterning of Ca2+ signals by the subcellular distribution of IP3 and IP3 receptors.Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.943–10. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.01.012
72
López-HidalgoM.HooverW.SchummersJ. (2016). Spatial organization of astrocytes in ferret visual cortex.J. Comp. Neurol.5243561–3576. 10.1002/cne.24015
73
LosiG.MariottiL.SessoloM.CarmignotoG. (2017). New Tools to Study Astrocyte Ca2+ Signal Dynamics in Brain Networks In Vivo.Front. Cell Neurosci.11:134. 10.3389/fncel.2017.00134
74
MacVicarB.NewmanE. (2015). Astrocyte regulation of blood flow in the brain.Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.7:a020388. 10.1101/cshperspect.a020388
75
MahmoudS.GharagozlooM.SimardC.GrisD. (2019). Astrocytes maintain glutamate homeostasis in the CNS by controlling the balance between glutamate uptake and release.Cells8:184. 10.3390/cells8020184
76
MalarkeyE.ParpuraV. (2008). Mechanisms of glutamate release from astrocytes.Neurochem. Int.52142–154. 10.1016/j.neuint.2007.06.005
77
MarchalandJ.CalìC.VoglmaierS.LiH.RegazziR.EdwardsR.et al (2008). Fast subplasma membrane Ca2+ transients control exo-endocytosis of synaptic-like microvesicles in astrocytes.J. Neurosci.289122–9132. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0040-08.2008
78
MariottiL.LosiG.SessoloM.MarconI.CarmignotoG. (2016). The inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA evokes long-lasting Ca(2+) oscillations in cortical astrocytes.Glia64363–373. 10.1002/glia.22933
79
MartineauM.ShiT.PuyalJ.KnolhoffA.DulongJ.GasnierB.et al (2013). Storage and uptake of D-serine into astrocytic synaptic-like vesicles specify gliotransmission.J. Neurosci.333413–3423. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3497-12.2013
80
MatiasI.MorgadoJ.GomesF. (2019). Astrocyte heterogeneity: Impact to brain aging and disease.Front. Aging Neurosci.11:59. 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00059
81
MedinaJ.GiaumeC.TaberneroA. (1999). Metabolic coupling and the role played by astrocytes in energy distribution and homeostasis.Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.468361–371. 10.1007/978-1-4615-4685-6_28
82
MielnickaA.MichalukP. (2021). Exocytosis in astrocytes.Biomolecules11:1367. 10.3390/biom11091367
83
MillerR.RaffM. (1984). Fibrous and protoplasmic astrocytes are biochemically and developmentally distinct.J. Neurosci.4585–592. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-02-00585.1984
84
MillerS. (2018). Astrocyte heterogeneity in the adult central nervous system.Front. Cell Neurosci.12:401. 10.3389/fncel.2018.00401
85
MontanaV.NiY.SunjaraV.HuaX.ParpuraV. (2004). Vesicular glutamate transporter-dependent glutamate release from astrocytes.J. Neurosci.242633–2642. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3770-03.2004
86
Murphy-RoyalC.DupuisJ.GrocL.OlietS. (2017). Astroglial glutamate transporters in the brain: Regulating neurotransmitter homeostasis and synaptic transmission.J. Neurosci. Res.952140–2151. 10.1002/jnr.24029
87
NagyJ.RashJ. (2000). Connexins and gap junctions of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes in the CNS.Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev.3229–44. 10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00066-1
88
NakayamaR.SasakiT.TanakaK.IkegayaY. (2016). Subcellular calcium dynamics during juvenile development in mouse hippocampal astrocytes.Eur. J. Neurosci.43923–932. 10.1111/ejn.13188
89
NanclaresC.BaraibarA.AraqueA.KofujiP. (2021). Dysregulation of astrocyte-neuronal communication in Alzheimer’s disease.Int. J. Mol. Sci.22:7887. 10.3390/ijms22157887
90
NavarreteM.AraqueA. (2014). The Cajal school and the physiological role of astrocytes: A way of thinking.Front. Neuroanat.8:33. 10.3389/fnana.2014.00033
91
NavarreteM.PereaG.Fernandez de SevillaD.Gómez-GonzaloM.NúñezA.MartínE. (2012). Astrocytes mediate in vivo cholinergic-induced synaptic plasticity.PLoS Biol.10:e1001259. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001259
92
NedergaardM.RodríguezJ.VerkhratskyA. (2010). Glial calcium and diseases of the nervous system.Cell Calcium47140–149. 10.1016/j.ceca.2009.11.010
93
NettW.OloffS.McCarthyK. (2002). Hippocampal astrocytes in situ exhibit calcium oscillations that occur independent of neuronal activity.J. Neurophysiol.87528–537. 10.1152/jn.00268.2001
94
NimmerjahnA.KirchhoffF.KerrJ.HelmchenF. (2004). Sulforhodamine 101 as a specific marker of astroglia in the neocortex in vivo.Nat. Methods131–37. 10.1038/nmeth706
95
NorenbergM. (1979). Distribution of glutamine synthetase in the rat central nervous system.J. Histochem. Cytochem.27756–762. 10.1177/27.3.39099
96
NwaobiS.CuddapahV.PattersonK.RandolphA.OlsenM. (2016). The role of glial-specific Kir4.1 in normal and pathological states of the CNS.Acta Neuropathol.1321–21. 10.1007/s00401-016-1553-1
97
OgataK.KosakaT. (2002). Structural and quantitative analysis of astrocytes in the mouse hippocampus.Neuroscience113221–233. 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00041-6
98
OkadaM.FukuyamaK.ShiroyamaT.UedaY. (2021). Brivaracetam prevents astroglial l-glutamate release associated with hemichannel through modulation of synaptic vesicle protein.Biomed. Pharmacother.138:111462. 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111462
99
OkuboY.KanemaruK.SuzukiJ.KobayashiK.HiroseK.IinoM. (2019). Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 2-independent Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum in astrocytes.Glia67113–124. 10.1002/glia.23531
100
OtsuY.CouchmanK.LyonsD.CollotM.AgarwalA.MalletJ.et al (2015). Calcium dynamics in astrocyte processes during neurovascular coupling.Nat. Neurosci.18210–218. 10.1038/nn.3906
101
PacholkoA.WottonC.BekarL. (2020). Astrocytes-the ultimate effectors of long-range neuromodulatory networks?Front. Cell Neurosci.14:581075. 10.3389/fncel.2020.581075
102
PanatierA.ValléeJ.HaberM.MuraiK.LacailleJ.RobitailleR. (2011). Astrocytes are endogenous regulators of basal transmission at central synapses.Cell146785–798. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.022
103
PanditS.NeupaneC.WooJ.SharmaR.NamM.LeeG.et al (2020). Bestrophin1-mediated tonic GABA release from reactive astrocytes prevents the development of seizure-prone network in kainate-injected hippocampi.Glia681065–1080. 10.1002/glia.23762
104
PangršičT.PotokarM.StenovecM.KreftM.FabbrettiE.NistriA.et al (2007). Exocytotic release of ATP from cultured astrocytes.J. Biol. Chem.28228749–28758. 10.1074/jbc.M700290200
105
ParkA.CrosetV.OttoN.AgarwalD.TreiberC.MeschiE.et al (2022). Gliotransmission of D-serine promotes thirst-directed behaviors in Drosophila.Curr. Biol.323952–3970.e8. 10.1016/j.cub.2022.07.038
106
ParpuraV.VerkhratskyA. (2012). Astrocytes revisited: Concise historic outlook on glutamate homeostasis and signaling.Croat. Med. J.53518–528. 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.518
107
PatrushevI.GavrilovN.TurlapovV.SemyanovA. (2013). Subcellular location of astrocytic calcium stores favors extrasynaptic neuron-astrocyte communication.Cell Calcium54343–349. 10.1016/j.ceca.2013.08.003
108
PaukertM.AgarwalA.ChaJ.DozeV.KangJ.BerglesD. (2014). Norepinephrine controls astroglial responsiveness to local circuit activity.Neuron821263–1270. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.038
109
PereaG.AraqueA. (2005). Glial calcium signaling and neuron-glia communication.Cell Calcium38375–382. 10.1016/j.ceca.2005.06.015
110
PereaG.GómezR.MederosS.CoveloA.BallesterosJ.SchlosserL.et al (2016). Activity-dependent switch of GABAergic inhibition into glutamatergic excitation in astrocyte-neuron networks.eLife5:e20362. 10.7554/eLife.20362
111
PetraviczJ.FiaccoT.McCarthyK. (2008). Loss of IP3 receptor-dependent Ca2+ increases in hippocampal astrocytes does not affect baseline CA1 pyramidal neuron synaptic activity.J. Neurosci.284967–4973. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5572-07.2008
112
PetzoldG.MurthyV. (2011). Role of astrocytes in neurovascular coupling.Neuron71782–797. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.009
113
PhamC.HéraultK.OheimM.MalderaS.VialouV.CauliB.et al (2021). Astrocytes respond to a neurotoxic Aβ fragment with state-dependent Ca2+ alteration and multiphasic transmitter release.Acta Neuropathol. Commun.9:44. 10.1186/s40478-021-01146-1
114
RakersC.PetzoldG. (2017). Astrocytic calcium release mediates peri-infarct depolarizations in a rodent stroke model.J. Clin. Invest.127511–516. 10.1172/JCI89354
115
RansomC.YeZ.SpainW.RichersonG. (2017). Modulation of Tonic GABA currents by anion channel and connexin hemichannel antagonists.Neurochem. Res.422551–2559. 10.1007/s11064-017-2246-4
116
RefaeliR.DoronA.Benmelech-ChovavA.GroysmanM.KreiselT.LoewensteinY.et al (2021). Features of hippocampal astrocytic domains and their spatial relation to excitatory and inhibitory neurons.Glia692378–2390. 10.1002/glia.24044
117
RibotJ.BretonR.CalvoC.MoulardJ.EzanP.ZapataJ.et al (2021). Astrocytes close the mouse critical period for visual plasticity.Science37377–81. 10.1126/science.abf5273
118
RobinL.Oliveira da CruzJ.LanglaisV.Martin-FernandezM.Metna-LaurentM.Busquets-GarciaA.et al (2018). Astroglial CB1 Receptors Determine Synaptic D-Serine Availability to Enable Recognition Memory.Neuron98935–944.e5. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.04.034
119
RoseC.ZiemensD.VerkhratskyA. (2020). On the special role of NCX in astrocytes: Translating Na+-transients into intracellular Ca2+ signals.Cell Calcium86:102154. 10.1016/j.ceca.2019.102154
120
RungtaR.BernierL.Dissing-OlesenL.GrotenC.LeDueJ.KoR.et al (2016). Ca2+ transients in astrocyte fine processes occur via Ca2+ influx in the adult mouse hippocampus.Glia642093–2103. 10.1002/glia.23042
121
SaabA.NeumeyerA.JahnH.CupidoA.ŠimekA.BoeleH.et al (2012). Bergmann glial AMPA receptors are required for fine motor coordination.Science.337749–753. 10.1126/science.1221140
122
SemyanovA. (2019). Spatiotemporal pattern of calcium activity in astrocytic network.Cell Calcium7815–25. 10.1016/j.ceca.2018.12.007
123
SemyanovA.HennebergerC.AgarwalA. (2020). Making sense of astrocytic calcium signals - from acquisition to interpretation.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.21551–564. 10.1038/s41583-020-0361-8
124
SemyanovA.VerkhratskyA. (2021). Astrocytic processes: From tripartite synapses to the active milieu.Trends Neurosci.44781–792. 10.1016/j.tins.2021.07.006
125
ShehabS.Cronly-DillonJ.NonaS.StaffordC. (1990). Preferential histochemical staining of protoplasmic and fibrous astrocytes in rat CNS with GFAP antibodies using different fixatives.Brain Res.518347–352. 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90996-o
126
ShibasakiK.IkenakaK.TamaluF.TominagaM.IshizakiY. (2014). A novel subtype of astrocytes expressing TRPV4 (transient receptor potential vanilloid 4) regulates neuronal excitability via release of gliotransmitters.J. Biol. Chem.28914470–14480. 10.1074/jbc.M114.557132
127
ShigetomiE.BowserD.SofroniewM.KhakhB. (2008). Two forms of astrocyte calcium excitability have distinct effects on NMDA receptor-mediated slow inward currents in pyramidal neurons.J. Neurosci.286659–6663. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1717-08.2008
128
ShigetomiE.BushongE.HausteinM.TongX.Jackson-WeaverO.KracunS.et al (2013). Imaging calcium microdomains within entire astrocyte territories and endfeet with GCaMPs expressed using adeno-associated viruses.J. Gen. Physiol.141633–647. 10.1085/jgp.201210949
129
ShigetomiE.KracunS.SofroniewM.KhakhB. S. (2010). A genetically targeted optical sensor to monitor calcium signals in astrocyte processes.Nat. Neurosci.13759–766. 10.1038/nn.2557
130
ShigetomiE.SaitoK.SanoF.KoizumiS. (2019). Aberrant Calcium Signals in Reactive Astrocytes: A Key Process in Neurological Disorders.Int. J. Mol. Sci.20:996. 10.3390/ijms20040996
131
ShigetomiE.TongX.KwanK.CoreyD.KhakhB. (2011). TRPA1 channels regulate astrocyte resting calcium and inhibitory synapse efficacy through GAT-3.Nat. Neurosci.1570–80. 10.1038/nn.3000
132
SildM.Van HornM. (2013). Astrocytes use a novel transporter to fill gliotransmitter vesicles with D-serine: Evidence for vesicular synergy.J. Neurosci.3310193–10194. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1665-13.2013
133
SloanS.BarresB. (2014). Looks can be deceiving: Reconsidering the evidence for gliotransmission.Neuron841112–1115. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.003
134
SrinivasanR.HuangB.VenugopalS.JohnstonA.ChaiH.ZengH.et al (2015). Ca(2+) signaling in astrocytes from Ip3r2(-/-) mice in brain slices and during startle responses in vivo.Nat. Neurosci.18708–717. 10.1038/nn.4001
135
StevensC.WangY. (1995). Facilitation and depression at single central synapses.Neuron14795–802. 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90223-6
136
StobartJ.FerrariK.BarrettM.GlückC.StobartM.ZuendM.et al (2018). Cortical circuit activity evokes rapid astrocyte calcium signals on a similar timescale to neurons.Neuron98726–735.e4. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.050
137
SüdhofT. (2012). Calcium control of neurotransmitter release.Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.4:a011353. 10.1101/cshperspect.a011353
138
SunM.DevarajuP.XieA.HolmanI.SamonesE.MurphyT.et al (2014). Astrocyte calcium microdomains are inhibited by bafilomycin A1 and cannot be replicated by low-level Schaffer collateral stimulation in situ.Cell Calcium551–16. 10.1016/j.ceca.2013.10.004
139
SunW.CornwellA.LiJ.PengS.OsorioM.AallingN.et al (2017). SOX9 is an astrocyte-specific nuclear marker in the adult brain outside the neurogenic regions.J. Neurosci.374493–4507. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3199-16.2017
140
TakataN.MishimaT.HisatsuneC.NagaiT.EbisuiE.MikoshibaK.et al (2011). Astrocyte calcium signaling transforms cholinergic modulation to cortical plasticity in vivo.J. Neurosci.3118155–18165. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5289-11.2011
141
TapanesS.ArizanovskaD.DíazM.FolorunsoO.HarveyT.BrownS.et al (2022). Inhibition of glial D-serine release rescues synaptic damage after brain injury.Glia701133–1152. 10.1002/glia.24161
142
TongX.ShigetomiE.LoogerL.KhakhB. (2013). Genetically encoded calcium indicators and astrocyte calcium microdomains.Neuroscientist19274–291. 10.1177/1073858412468794
143
TurovskyE.TheparambilS.KasymovV.DeitmerJ.Del ArroyoA.AcklandG.et al (2016). Mechanisms of CO2/H+ Sensitivity of Astrocytes.J. Neurosci.3610750–10758. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1281-16.2016
144
VardyE.RobinsonJ.LiC.OlsenR.DiBertoJ.GiguereP.et al (2015). A New DREADD facilitates the multiplexed chemogenetic interrogation of behavior.Neuron86936–946. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.065
145
VerkhratskyA.NedergaardM. (2018). Physiology of astroglia.Physiol. Rev.98239–389. 10.1152/physrev.00042.2016
146
VerkhratskyA.TrebakM.PerocchiF.KhananshviliD.SeklerI. (2018). Crosslink between calcium and sodium signalling.Exp. Physiol.103157–169. 10.1113/EP086534
147
VolterraA.LiaudetN.SavtchoukI. (2014). Astrocyte Ca2+ signalling: An unexpected complexity.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.15327–335. 10.1038/nrn3725
148
WangF.SmithN.XuQ.FujitaT.BabaA.MatsudaT.et al (2012). Astrocytes modulate neural network activity by Ca2+-dependent uptake of extracellular K+.Sci. Signal.5ra26. 10.1126/scisignal.2002334
149
WangF.SmithN.XuQ.GoldmanS.PengW.HuangJ.et al (2013). Photolysis of caged Ca2+ but not receptor-mediated Ca2+ signaling triggers astrocytic glutamate release.J. Neurosci.3317404–17412. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2178-13.2013
150
WangX.LouN.XuQ.TianG.PengW.HanX.et al (2006). Astrocytic Ca2+ signaling evoked by sensory stimulation in vivo.Nat. Neurosci.9816–823. 10.1038/nn1703
151
WangY.DelRossoN.VaidyanathanT.CahillM.ReitmanM.PittoloS.et al (2019). Accurate quantification of astrocyte and neurotransmitter fluorescence dynamics for single-cell and population-level physiology.Nat. Neurosci.221936–1944. 10.1038/s41593-019-0492-2
152
WoloskerH.BlackshawS.SnyderS. (1999). Serine racemase: A glial enzyme synthesizing D-serine to regulate glutamate-N-methyl-D-aspartate neurotransmission.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.9613409–13414. 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13409
153
WooD.HanK.ShimJ.YoonB.KimE.BaeJ.et al (2012). TREK-1 and Best1 channels mediate fast and slow glutamate release in astrocytes upon GPCR activation.Cell15125–40. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.005
154
WuY.GordleevaS.TangX.ShihP.DembitskayaY.SemyanovA. (2019). Morphological profile determines the frequency of spontaneous calcium events in astrocytic processes.Glia67246–262. 10.1002/glia.23537
155
XinW.BonciA. (2018). Functional astrocyte heterogeneity and implications for their role in shaping neurotransmission.Front. Cell Neurosci.12:141. 10.3389/fncel.2018.00141
156
XiongY.TengS.ZhengL.SunS.LiJ.GuoN.et al (2018). Stretch-induced Ca2+ independent ATP release in hippocampal astrocytes.J. Physiol.5961931–1947. 10.1113/JP275805
157
XuJ.PengH.KangN.ZhaoZ.LinJ.StantonP.et al (2007). Glutamate-induced exocytosis of glutamate from astrocytes.J. Biol. Chem.28224185–24197. 10.1074/jbc.M700452200
158
YangJ.ViteryM.ChenJ.Osei-OwusuJ.ChuJ.QiuZ. (2019). Glutamate-Releasing SWELL1 channel in astrocytes modulates synaptic transmission and promotes brain damage in stroke.Neuron102813–827.e6. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.03.029
159
YoonB.LeeC. (2014). GABA as a rising gliotransmitter.Front. Neural Circuits8:141. 10.3389/fncir.2014.00141
160
YuX.MoyeS.KhakhB. (2021). Local and CNS-Wide astrocyte intracellular calcium signaling attenuation in vivo with calexflox mice.J. Neurosci.414556–4574. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0085-21.2021
161
YuX.NagaiJ.KhakhB. (2020). Improved tools to study astrocytes.Nat. Rev. Neurosci.21121–138. 10.1038/s41583-020-0264-8
162
YuX.TaylorA.NagaiJ.GolshaniP.EvansC.CoppolaG.et al (2018). Reducing astrocyte calcium signaling in vivo alters striatal microcircuits and causes repetitive behavior.Neuron991170–1187.e9. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.015
163
ZhangN.DingS. (2018). Imaging of Mitochondrial and Cytosolic Ca2+ Signals in Cultured Astrocytes.Curr. Protoc. Neurosci.822.29.1–2.29.11. 10.1002/cpns.42
164
ZhangQ.PangrsicT.KreftM.KrzanM.LiN.SulJ.et al (2004). Fusion-related release of glutamate from astrocytes.J. Biol. Chem.27912724–12733. 10.1074/jbc.M312845200
165
ZhangY.BarresB. (2010). Astrocyte heterogeneity: An underappreciated topic in neurobiology.Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.20588–594. 10.1016/j.conb.2010.06.005
166
ZhangZ.ChenG.ZhouW.SongA.XuT.LuoQ.et al (2007). Regulated ATP release from astrocytes through lysosome exocytosis.Nat. Cell Biol.9945–953. 10.1038/ncb1620
167
ZhangZ.MaZ.ZouW.GuoH.LiuM.MaY.et al (2019). The appropriate marker for astrocytes: Comparing the distribution and expression of three astrocytic markers in different mouse cerebral regions.Biomed. Res. Int.2019:9605265. 10.1155/2019/9605265
168
ZhouM.XuG.XieM.ZhangX.SchoolsG.MaL.et al (2009). TWIK-1 and TREK-1 are potassium channels contributing significantly to astrocyte passive conductance in rat hippocampal slices.J. Neurosci.298551–8564. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5784-08.2009
169
ZorecR.AraqueA.CarmignotoG.HaydonP.VerkhratskyA.ParpuraV. (2012). Astroglial excitability and gliotransmission: An appraisal of Ca2+ as a signalling route.ASN Neuro4:e00080. 10.1042/AN20110061
Summary
Keywords
astrocyte, gliotransmission, tripartite synapse, plasticity, calcium signaling
Citation
Goenaga J, Araque A, Kofuji P and Herrera Moro Chao D (2023) Calcium signaling in astrocytes and gliotransmitter release. Front. Synaptic Neurosci. 15:1138577. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2023.1138577
Received
05 January 2023
Accepted
16 February 2023
Published
02 March 2023
Volume
15 - 2023
Edited by
Marta Mota Vieira, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, United States
Reviewed by
Isabella Farhy-Tselnicker, Texas A&M University, United States; Matthias Tasso Wyss, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Thomas J. Papouin, Washington University in St. Louis, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Goenaga, Araque, Kofuji and Herrera Moro Chao.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Paulo Kofuji, kofuj001@umn.eduDaniela Herrera Moro Chao, herrerad@umn.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.