Differential Ca 2+ handling by isolated synaptic and non-synaptic mitochondria: roles of Ca 2+ buffering and efflux

Jyotsna MishraKyle BeversKeguo LiArmaan ZareJames S HeisnerAiling TongWai-Meng KwokDavid F StoweAmadou K.S. Camara^*

• Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States

Mitochondria regulate intracellular calcium ion (Ca2+) signaling by a fine-tuned process of mitochondrial matrix (m) Ca2+ influx, mCa2+ buffering (sequestration) and mCa2+ release (Ca2+ efflux). This process is critically important in the neurosynaptic terminal, where there is a simultaneous high demand for ATP utilization, cytosolic (c) Ca2+ regulation, and maintenance of ionic gradients across the cell membrane. Brain synaptic and non-synaptic mitochondria display marked differences in Ca2+ retention capacity. We hypothesized that mitochondrial Ca2+ handling in these two mitochondrial populations is determined by the net effects of Ca2+ uptake, buffering or efflux with increasing CaCl2 boluses. We found first that synaptic mitochondria have a more coupled respiration than non-synaptic mitochondria; this may correlate with the higher local energy demand in synapses to support neurotransmission. When both mitochondrial fractions were exposed to increasing mCa2+ loads we observed decreased mCa2+ sequestration in synaptic mitochondria as assessed by a significant increase in the steady-state free extra matrix Ca2+ (ss[Ca2+]e) compared to non-synaptic mitochondria. Since, non-synaptic mitochondria displayed a significantly reduced ss[Ca 2+ ]e, this suggested a larger mCa2+ buffering capacity to maintain [Ca2+]m with increasing mCa2+ loads. There were no differences in the magnitude of the transient depolarizations and repolarizations of the membrane potential (m) and both fractions exhibited similar gradual depolarization of the baseline m during additional CaCl2 boluses. Adding the mitochondrial Na + /Ca 2+ exchanger (mNCE) inhibitor CGP37157 to the mitochondrial suspensions unmasked the mCa2+ sequestration and concomitantly lowered ss[Ca2+]e in synaptic vs. non-synaptic mitochondria. Adding complex V inhibitor oligomycin plus ADP (OMN+ADP) bolstered the matrix Ca2+ buffering capacity in synaptic mitochondria, as did Cyclosporine A (CsA), in non-synaptic. Our results display distinct differences in regulation of the free [Ca2+]m to prevent collapse of m during mCa2+ overload in the two populations of mitochondria. Synaptic mitochondria appear to rely mainly on mCa2+ efflux via mNCE, while non-synaptic mitochondria rely mainly on Pi-dependent mCa2+ sequestration. The functional implications of differential mCa2+ handling at neuronal synapses may be adaptations to cope with the higher metabolic activity and larger mCa2+ transients at synaptosomes, reflecting a distinct role they play in brain function.