Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Syst. Biol.

Sec. Translational Systems Biology and In Silico Trials

Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsysb.2025.1632110

This article is part of the Research TopicCurated Articles in Systems Biology ResearchView all articles

Aging and Activity Patterns: Actigraphy Evidence from NHANES Studies

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, new Jersey, United States
  • 2Hackensak Meridian Health, Neptune, United States
  • 3Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Busch Campus, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Study Objectives: This study examines age-related variations in activity patterns using actigraphy data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). By analyzing sleep onset, wake times, and daily activity levels across different age groups, we aim to uncover key changes in chronotype and physical engagement with aging. From a systems-biology perspective, minute-level rest–activity traces are emergent outputs of coupled circadian–homeostatic–behavioral networks. Treating actigraphy as a high-throughput phenotyping readout, we use NHANES to extract system-level markers (phase, amplitude, and transition dynamics) that reflect network organization across the lifespan. Methods: Actigraphy data from NHANES (2011-2013) were analyzed using machine learning techniques to identify distinct activity clusters among four age groups (19–30, 31–50, 51–70, 71–80). We implemented an unsupervised machine learning pipeline that clustered average-day actigraphy profiles, enabling the identification of distinct, age-dependent rest–activity phenotypes from the NHANES dataset. Sleep-wake cycles, activity intensities, and circadian periodicities were assessed through clustering and statistical modeling. Key metrics, including winding down activity and time to alertness, were derived to evaluate age-related variations. Results: Younger individuals exhibited delayed chronotypes with later sleep and wake times, whereas older adults showed advanced and more structured schedules. Winding down periods lengthened with age, and overall activity levels declined progressively. Time to alertness showed a strong correlation with wake time in younger groups but diminished with age, indicating a weakening circadian influence. Conclusions: Aging is associated with shifts in sleep-wake cycles and activity patterns, reflecting biological and behavioral adaptations. These findings highlight the importance of personalized interventions to support optimal activity and sleep alignment across the lifespan. Insights from actigraphy data can inform public health strategies and clinical approaches to aging-related changes in physical activity and circadian regulation. These age-stratified, interpretable “dynamical phenotypes” provide observables to calibrate and validate systems-level models of sleep–wake regulation and behavior–physiology coupling, supporting hypothesis generation and intervention design in systems biology.

Keywords: Actigraphy, Chronotype, Aging, sleep-wake cycle, physical activity, circadian rhythms, NHANES, machine learning

Received: 20 May 2025; Accepted: 29 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Luo, Scharf and Androulakis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ioannis P Androulakis, yannis@soe.rutgers.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.