Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Urol., 29 January 2026

Sec. Male Urology

Volume 6 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fruro.2026.1776078

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Pharmacological Treatments for Urogenital DisordersView all 5 articles

Editorial: Advances in pharmacological treatments for urogenital disorders

  • 1Department of Pathology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
  • 2Coriell Institute for Medical Research, Camden, NJ, United States
  • 3Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China

Pharmacological treatments have become increasingly central to managing urogenital disorders, including benign prostatic hyperplasia, bladder inflammation, and bladder cancer, progressively reducing reliance on invasive surgery. Contemporary strategies integrate targeted pharmacological agents with natural supplements, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven drug selection, and regenerative medicine approaches including plant-derived bioactive compounds. This combination approach transcends simple co-administration of agents, instead of representing intelligent integration of multiple modalities for synergistic therapeutic benefits. Furthermore, urology’s historic tradition of technological innovation, superior patient treatment adherence, and the specialty’s progressive mindset collectively position it as an ideal platform for translating innovative pharmacological and regenerative medicine strategies into clinical practice (1).

Zhou et al. have eloquently articulated the paradigm shift in BPH management, demonstrating that treatment is transitioning from single-modality, traditional surgical approaches such as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) toward multi-modal, patient-centered models. Emerging minimally invasive surgical therapies (MISTs), particularly those designed to preserve sexual function and accommodate variable prostate volumes, are gaining prominence. Concurrently, future therapeutic approaches will increasingly incorporate personalized treatment strategies that leverage AI and regenerative medicine, enabling clinicians to select optimal interventions based on individual patient characteristics including prostate size, symptom severity, and comorbidity profiles. AI technologies are poised to become transformative agents in BPH management, fundamentally reshaping treatment selection and prognostication.

Cellular and immunological targeted drug therapies provide viable alternatives for patients unable to tolerate conventional treatments. Lanman et al. have identified TREM2-high and MARCO-high macrophages as key drivers of lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with enlarged prostates, revealing that lipid-rich macrophages exacerbate disease progression. This finding reveals how lipid metabolism dysregulation drives chronic BPH-associated inflammation and hyperplasia, establishing a molecular framework for TREM2-targeted therapeutics. For patients unsuitable for surgery or unresponsive to monotherapy, macrophage-targeted combination approaches offer promising options for the patients, particularly in metabolic syndrome-related BPH resistant to current treatments like α-blockers and 5α-reductase inhibitors (2).

While cystoscopy remains the gold standard diagnostic tool in bladder disease management, combination anesthetic pharmacological preparation has substantially improved procedural efficacy and patient tolerance. Bai et al. have documented that combined anesthesia—integrating tetracaine hydrochloride topical surface anesthesia with intravenous anesthesia—provides substantial advantages for painless cystoscopy. This pharmacological combination effectively reduces propofol dosage requirements, shortens both cystoscopic and total operative times by approximately 50%, and simultaneously improves postoperative oxygenation (SpO2) while maintaining excellent safety profiles. These outcomes translate into enhanced patient trust and satisfaction, fundamental elements that strengthen the therapeutic relationship and procedural acceptance.

In bladder cancer management, while surgical approaches represent established standards of care, pharmacological treatments remain critically important and can be strategically combined with plant-derived therapeutics. Guo et al. have recently demonstrated that dihydromyricetin (DHM), a natural plant-derived compound, exhibits potent anti-tumor activity against muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) through multiple mechanisms: inhibiting tumor proliferation and metastasis by inducing cell cycle arrest, activating caspase-dependent apoptotic pathways, and reversing the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process. Although certain dosages demonstrate potential pulmonary toxicity, the overall favorable efficacy-to-toxicity profile positions DHM as a strong candidate for combination chemotherapy approaches.

The overarching principle unifying these diverse advances is the centrality of combination therapy (Figure 1). Whether through AI-enhanced clinical decision-making, combined anesthetic techniques, or the integration of plant-derived compounds with conventional pharmacotherapy, the evidence consistently supports multimodal approaches over isolated interventions across all urogenital pathologies. This combination philosophy must guide our therapeutic strategy at every level—from diagnosis through clinical practice (3).

Figure 1
Diagram illustrating innovative therapeutic strategies for urogenital disorders. Central circle labeled “Urogenital Disorders” is surrounded by four colored circles: blue for “Artificial Intelligence,” green for “Plant-based Medication,” purple for “Cell Therapy,” and yellow for “Combined Anesthesia.” Arrows connect these to related approaches: “Painless Cystoscopy,” “Personalized BPH Management,” “DHM Anti-Bladder Cancer,” and “MΦ-targeted Combination Approaches.

Figure 1. Advances in combination therapy for urogenital disorders. The integrated framework illustrates four cutting-edge therapeutic approaches that are advancing the treatment of urogenital disorders. First, artificial intelligence has emerged as a powerful tool for personalizing BPH treatment protocols while also enhancing the feasibility of painless cystoscopy procedures. Second, plant-derived therapeutics represent a promising medication, with compounds such as dihydromyricetin (DHM) showing potential in bladder cancer treatment. Third, cellular therapy approaches are being explored through macrophage-targeted (MΦ-targeted) combination strategies that address a group of urogenital pathologies. Finally, innovation in combined anesthesia protocols have proven instrumental in achieving painless cystoscopy and improving overall patient comfort during diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. These four domains are inherently interconnected, demonstrating how digital technology, novel pharmacology, cellular bioengineering, and procedural innovations work together to create comprehensive solutions for contemporary urological and genital health challenges.

Urogenital disorders inherently benefit from combination therapy due to their multifactorial pathophysiology and complex patient populations. These conditions—erectile dysfunction, lower urinary tract symptoms, infertility, and chronic pelvic pain—rarely stem from a single cause; they involve vascular, neurogenic, hormonal, psychological, and inflammatory components acting in concert. Furthermore, urogenital patients are predominantly aging adults with significant comorbidities (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension and other metabolic syndrome) that directly influence disease pathogenesis and therapeutic response (4). Combination therapy’s simultaneous targeting of multiple disease pathways proves superior to monotherapy, particularly in aging patients with complex urogenital disorders where single interventions prove inadequate. This multimodal approach addresses the intrinsic complexity of urogenital pathology and yields better clinical outcomes. This foundation supports a fundamental paradigm shift in urological practice: from asking “Is surgery indicated?” to “Which combination of interventions—pharmacological, surgical, behavioral, or technological—will optimally serve this individual patient?”.

Author contributions

XW: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. PW: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. QY: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. Support for this research was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82400906) to Dr. Xiaolong Wang and the Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Program, China (Grant No. 2024A03J1148) to Prof. Qingfeng Yu. The research team retained complete autonomy throughout all stages of the publication decisions, with no interference from the funding bodies.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Scardino PT. Urology: a long history of innovation. Nat Clin Pract Urol. (2008) 5:59. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro1042

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Wang X, Guo L, Liu G, and Liu T. Leptin mediates prostate stromal cell proliferation, smooth muscle contraction, and mitochondrial function in benign prostate hyperplasia. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. (2023) 16:3261–73. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S420258

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Guo L, Zuo Y, Yisha Z, Liu J, Gu A, Yushan R, et al. Diagnostic performance of advanced large language models in cystoscopy: evidence from a retrospective study and clinical cases. BMC Urol. (2025) 25:64. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01740-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Wang X, Yu Q, and Michel MC. Editorial: Benign prostatic hyperplasia and overactive bladder: new members of metabolic syndrome. Front Urol. (2023) 3:1272592. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2023.1272592

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: artificial intelligence - AI, bladder cancer (BCa), BPH (benign prostatic hyperplasia), combination therapy, pharmacological treatment

Citation: Wang X, Wang P and Yu Q (2026) Editorial: Advances in pharmacological treatments for urogenital disorders. Front. Urol. 6:1776078. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2026.1776078

Received: 26 December 2025; Accepted: 14 January 2026; Revised: 13 January 2026;
Published: 29 January 2026.

Edited and reviewed by:

Giorgio Ivan Russo, University of Catania, Italy

Copyright © 2026 Wang, Wang and Yu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Qingfeng Yu, eXVxZjIwMTBAZ21haWwuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.