ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Water
Sec. Water and Hydrocomplexity
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frwa.2025.1320010
This article is part of the Research TopicClimate, Water and Land in Africa: Research Trends and ChallengesView all 9 articles
In Situ, Modeled, and Earth Observation Monitoring of Surface Water Availability in West African Rangelands
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, United States
- 2Goddard Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Greenbelt, Maryland, United States
- 3Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, United States Geological Survey (USGS), Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
- 4Climate Hazards Center, Department of Geography, College of Letters & Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States
- 5Action Against Hunger West and Central Africa Regional Office, Dakar, Senegal
- 6NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, United States
- 7Hydrological Sciences Laboratory, Goddard Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Greenbelt, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Rangeland ponds are vital to the livelihoods of pastoral and agropastoral communities in Africa, providing an important source of water for livestock. However, sparse instrumentation across much of Africa makes it extremely challenging to monitor surface water availability in these areas. Model estimates of surface water, for example as used by the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) Water Point Viewer, are one of the few operational tools available to monitor surface water stress across pastoral areas of the Sahel and East Africa. Water availability data from these models are difficult to validate. New methods using satellite data to classify surface water provide an opportunity to assess the performance of these tools. This study compares water availability estimates derived from Landsat and Sentinel 1 satellite imagery to in situ observations and model simulations of water availability in 22 ephemeral ponds located in the Ferlo region of Senegal. The Active-Passive Water Classification (APWC) algorithm detected surface water at each location. Over 2022 and 2023, water was detected in pond locations annually at a frequency of 68.2% for all ponds and at frequency of 43.8% in ponds with a surface area less than 10,000 square meters (m 2 ). The APWC results outperform global and continental surface water datasets in the Ferlo region. Seasonal water availability was captured in twelve ponds over the 2022 and 2023 seasons. The twelve locations can function as sentinel ponds to monitor local water availability. Study results demonstrate the viability of satellite methods to assess water availability in the region as well as the challenges to using satellite-based methods to estimate water availability in small ponds.
Keywords: rangelands, Pastoral, agropastoral, Sentinel 1, Surface water classification, Landsat, Water balance model
Received: 11 Oct 2023; Accepted: 27 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Slinski, Senay, Alkhalil, Shukla, Mcnally, Rowland, Fillol, Yatheendradas, Funk, Hoell and Jasinski. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Kimberly Slinski, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.