ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Water
Sec. Water and Human Systems
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frwa.2025.1575169
This article is part of the Research TopicWater Rights and Conflicts in Sub-Saharan AfricaView all 5 articles
The linkages between water security, conflict, participation, and governance in smallholder irrigation schemes in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling approach
Provisionally accepted
- University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The increasing competition for water resources leads to conflict, as utility-maximizing farmers aim to improve their productivity to enhance food security and economic well-being. Conflicts within Smallholder Irrigation Schemes (SIS) are particularly rife due to inequitable water distribution that stems from various factors, leading to water insecurity. Using a sample of 302 farmers, this study investigated the multiple linkages between irrigation scheme governance, participation in scheme management, conflicts, and water security. The study adopted the Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) approach to analyze the collective dynamic relationships between conflict, water rights, inclusive governance, and water security in SIS in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. The findings indicate that perceptions of governance, indicated by fairness in water allocation and enforceable water rules, are negatively related to conflicts in irrigation schemes. Furthermore, farmers who do not experience conflict are more likely to be water-secure. Results also indicate a negative relationship between participation in scheme management and conflict. As such, interventions should be targeted towards enhancing good governance, fostering farmer participation, and improving mechanisms of conflict management in SIS. This can be achieved by decentralizing decision-making to include farmers in rule enforcement, leveraging existing traditional authority structures to enhance legitimacy. The development of longitudinal datasets is also needed to track water adequacy, conflict trends, and governance efficacy to inform adaptive management to ensure water security.
Keywords: water resource governance, water security, Farmer participation, Water Conflict, Smallholder irrigation schemes, Partial least squares-structural equation modelling
Received: 11 Feb 2025; Accepted: 18 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Phali, Naidoo and Mudhara. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Lerato Phali, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.