Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Water

Sec. Water and Built Environment

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frwa.2025.1614008

Site-specific relationships between algal biomass and floating photovoltaic solar energy in human-made bodies of water

Provisionally accepted
  • 1University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
  • 2Lancaster University, Lancaster, England, United Kingdom
  • 3Enel (Italy), Rome, Lazio, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Eutrophication and climate-driven warming are degrading aquatic ecosystems by promoting harmful algal and cyanobacterial growth, while global decarbonization efforts are intensifying land-use conflicts for renewable energy. Floating solar photovoltaic (FPV) systems—solar panels installed on human-made waterbodies—offer a potential solution, yet their effects on algae and water quality remain poorly understood. We assessed algal biomass and water quality beneath FPVs and in open water at four FPV-hosting ponds across the United States, spanning a range of FPV coverage levels, trophic states, climates, and bathymetry. Sampling occurred twice daily across all seasons from 2021–2022. Results showed minimal overall differences in phycocyanin, chlorophyll-a, dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, and temperature between FPV-covered and open-water areas, though some site-specific trends emerged. At one mesotrophic site (4.8% coverage), chlorophyll-a and phycocyanin were significantly lower beneath FPVs in multiple seasons, with up to 80% reductions in chlorophyll-a observed in spring. In contrast, at a eutrophic site (22% coverage), chlorophyll-a was occasionally higher beneath FPVs, while two mesotrophic sites with high coverage (60–71%) showed no consistent differences. Dissolved oxygen and temperature exhibited limited site-specific variations but no consistent trends across FPVs. Overall, within-pond differences in algal biomass and water quality between FPV-covered and open-water areas were largely minimal, underscoring the need for further research with more FPV sites, before–after control–impact designs, and high-frequency monitoring to better understand FPV–algae interactions and potential water quality benefits.

Keywords: Floating Solar PV, Renewable Energy, Water Quality, Ecosystem impacts, Cyanobacteria, Field Measurements

Received: 18 Apr 2025; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Cagle, Narwold, Armstrong, Sadro, Pasquale, Di Blasi and Hernandez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Alexander E Cagle, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.