CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS article
Front. Water
Sec. Water Resource Management
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frwa.2025.1620626
This article is part of the Research TopicTransformational Strategies for Equitable Water Distribution in a Changing ClimateView all 7 articles
Enhancing water security and landscape resilience through Multibenefit Land Repurposing
Provisionally accepted- 1Environmental Defense Fund, San Francisco, United States
- 2Western States Program, Union of Concerned Scientists, Berkeley, CA, United States
- 3Department of Political Science, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada, United States
- 4Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States
- 5Zanjero, Sacramento, United States
- 6SocioEnvironmental and Education Network, Merced, CA, United States
- 7Environmental Incentives, Washington, DC, United States
- 8California Water Data Consortium, Sacramento, United States
- 9Center for Law, Energy & the Environment, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States
- 10Self-Help Enterprises, Visalia, California, United States
- 11Valley Eco, Merced, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Achieving water sustainability in many water-scarce regions will require reducing consumptive water use by converting irrigated agricultural land to less water intensive uses. Conventional approaches to this challenge that emphasize water conservation as a singular objective often promote ad-hoc approaches to temporarily leave land idle while missing an opportunity to enhance landscape resilience and harness synergies of managing water and land together. Multibenefit land repurposing offers an alternative solution to this challenge by strategically transitioning irrigated agricultural land to other beneficial uses that consume less water and provide benefits for multiple constituencies. In practice, multibenefit land repurposing involves the process of collaboration among different groups (e.g., growers and community members) and the outcome of converting irrigated agriculture to other multibenefit uses (e.g., groundwater recharge basins with habitat and water quality benefits). It integrates into a single framework the joint objectives of conserving water, creating benefits for society and the environment, and stimulating the growth of participatory governance networks. But the pathways through which multibenefit land repurposing can achieve these objectives have yet to be demonstrated, either empirically or conceptually. To this end, we illustrate conceptually how multibenefit land repurposing can be designed to enhance water security and enable a transition to more resilient landscapes, building a theory of change around three key elements: (i) creating multibenefit outcomes, (ii) improving strategic regional coordination, and (iii) shifting underlying institutional conditions to promote innovation, adaptation, and cooperation. We draw from experience with the ongoing Multibenefit Land Repurposing Program (MLRP) in California, which has brought together over 100 different organizations in support of eight regional teams to work collectively on coordinated land transformation. We use examples from MLRP to illustrate key components and challenges of the theory of change, including how multibenefit land repurposing may be implemented in practice. Despite being a relatively new approach, we argue that multibenefit land repurposing offers a pathway to building resilient landscapes, including in regions with historically severe and inequitable depletion of water resources.
Keywords: land repurposing, Polycentric governance, groundwater sustainability, systems change, Landscape resilience, Social-ecological systems, water security
Received: 29 Apr 2025; Accepted: 31 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Penny, Rodriguez-Flores, Fernandez-Bou, Koebele, Schiller, Solomon, Carlson, Classen-Rodriguez, Daniels, Grimm, Hall, Kiparsky, Mercado, Mudd and Sanchez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Gopal Penny, Environmental Defense Fund, San Francisco, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.