REVIEW article
Front. Water
Sec. Water and Climate
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frwa.2025.1672070
This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative Approaches to Quantify Virtual Water and Energy Flows in a Changing ClimateView all articles
Review and Synthesis: Dynamism of classical and holistic drought indices and indicators
Provisionally accepted- Sustainability Institute, School of the Environment, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Droughts are complex and recurring natural hazards throughout the ecosystems and impact many sectors of society. Droughts have complex spatiotemporal behaviors; therefore, monitoring them is a challenging task. Drought monitoring has depended chiefly on climate-based indices and indicators, thus deemed useful in many scenarios. This review aims to explore classical and holistic drought indicators/indices for unravelling their usefulness and associated limitations. Given that they offer a broadened spatial perspective of drought conditions and fluctuations over large areas, climate-based drought index maps may be of limited use. Precise evaluations of drought are necessary for efficient monitoring and assessment of the condition. Here, this review examined more than 50 indices/indicators for their sensitivity to input data requirements, spatiotemporal scales, strengths, and weaknesses. Also, an analysis was carried out based on the previous studies to identify hotspots and show the dissimilarity in the results yielded by different indices/indicators. None of these indices is typically inclusive enough to provide a broad-gauge assessment and determine appropriate actions. New and enhanced geospatial intelligence-based drought indices and earth observations are needed to identify, classify, and communicate real-time drought-related phenomena and offer an in-depth breakdown of the constraints and requirements of novel indicators and data difficulties.
Keywords: Droughts, Climatic water deficit, Aridity index, precipitation, evapotranspiration, Yield loss
Received: 23 Jul 2025; Accepted: 04 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Hirwa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Hubert Hirwa, Sustainability Institute, School of the Environment, Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, Florida, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.