ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Water
Sec. Environmental Water Quality
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frwa.2025.1694489
This article is part of the Research TopicMicrobial Source Tracking (MST) tools to identify the origins of fecal pollution in environmental water resources and the impact of microbial contaminants on human healthView all 4 articles
Enhanced detection of animal-derived microbial hazards in forested catchments using high-volume ultrafiltration and amplicon-based microbial source tracking
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- 2Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- 3Melbourne Water, Melbourne, Australia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Monitoring of drinking water sources is an essential component of broader public health practice. However, routine water monitoring programs that follow established methodological standards, such as low-volume grab sampling with standard filtration have limitations in being representative. Particularly for protected source waters where (wildlife introduced) pathogens are in low concentration and are not evenly distributed. Microbial source tracking (MST) offers a promising approach to close this gap, enabling more precise identification of faecal contamination sources and their associated risk. However, as with other culture-and molecular-based approaches, the sensitivity of MST is constrained by sample capture methodology, limited by sample volume, timing and randomness of grab sampling. This study investigated the application of a high-volume sample concentration method (EasyElute ultrafiltration) to enhance microbial recovery from source water. All evaluation was conducted alongside standard grab sampling and filtration methods. Post-concentration analyses combined traditional culture-based quantification of faecal indicator organisms (FIOs) and reference pathogens, with 16S rRNA amplicon MST to provide an integrated approach to surveillance of animal-derived microbial risks in forested water supply catchments. The results demonstrated that high-volume ultrafiltration enhanced bacterial recovery from source water samples, although turbidity was observed to limit overall efficiency, highlighting potential operational challenges. Comparative analysis demonstrated that amplicon-based MST produced consistent faecal source attribution across both standard and ultrafiltration methods, showing greater sensitivity at increasing volumes. This study advances MST methodology by demonstrating the feasibility, and added sensitivity achievable through high-volume, concentrated sample collection approaches. This is particularly relevant where water samples are expected to carry low microbial loads, ultimately offering a practical approach for improving faecal source tracking and risk assessment for water sources to protect public health in water supply catchments.
Keywords: faecal indicator organisms (FIOs), Reference pathogens, Microbial source tracking (MST), Ultrafiltration, Amplicon 16S rRNA
Received: 28 Aug 2025; Accepted: 03 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Henry, Lynch, Lim, Steele, Stevens, Bata, Lynch, Rasmika Dewi, Sharp, Orr, Ward, Haydon and Tseng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Rebekah Henry, rebekah.henry@monash.edu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.