Sex bias in medicine and computational neuroscience is a growing area of research that highlights the disparities in research, diagnosis, and treatment based on sex differences. Historically, medical studies have disproportionately focused on male participants, leading to gaps in understanding female-specific disease manifestations, drug responses, and neurological conditions. In computational neuroscience, models and algorithms often fail to account for sex differences in brain structure, function, and disease susceptibility. This bias limits the accuracy and applicability of computational tools in personalized medicine, neurodegenerative disorders, and psychiatric conditions. Addressing sex bias in these fields is crucial for developing equitable healthcare solutions and advancing precision medicine.
Despite advances in medicine and computational neuroscience, sex bias remains a critical issue, leading to disparities in diagnosis, treatment, and model accuracy. To address this, researchers must integrate sex as a biological variable in data collection, algorithm design, and clinical trials. By developing sex-sensitive computational models and improving representation in medical research, we can enhance precision medicine, ensure equitable healthcare, and reduce bias in neuroscience applications. Emerging machine-learning and deep-learning techniques are powerful tools to detect nuanced sex-based patterns in large-scale datasets, from genomic profiles to neuroimaging. Ensuring balanced datasets and tracking subgroup-specific outcomes can identify critical biomarkers and pathways underlying disease progression and therapeutic response across different sexes. Furthermore, addressing sex bias involves ethical, regulatory, and policy considerations. Clear reporting standards and the sharing of data disaggregated by sex can mitigate gaps and improve transparency.
This Research Topic addresses themes such as sex biases in brain function modeling, disease modeling and biomarker discovery, treatment responses, and algorithm prediction.
We invite contributions on methodological approaches for integrating sex as a biological variable, sex-aware AI models in neuroscience, and the impact of sex on neurological and psychiatric disorders. Additionally, while the primary focus of this issue is on sex bias, we welcome contributions that also explore intersections with other axes of diversity, such as age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic background. We encourage interdisciplinary work bridging medicine, neuroscience, and computational modeling to address sex bias and advance equitable, personalized healthcare solutions in neuroscience research and clinical applications.
Don't miss the chance to make your manuscript contribution and showcase your research alongside the work of other outstanding colleagues. Register your interest in the link below so our Topic Editors can make sure to extend deadlines for your submission if needed: Participate in this topic
Article types and fees
This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:
Brief Research Report
Conceptual Analysis
Data Report
Editorial
FAIR² Data
FAIR² DATA Direct Submission
General Commentary
Hypothesis and Theory
Methods
Articles that are accepted for publication by our external editors following rigorous peer review incur a publishing fee charged to Authors, institutions, or funders.
Article types
This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:
Brief Research Report
Conceptual Analysis
Data Report
Editorial
FAIR² Data
FAIR² DATA Direct Submission
General Commentary
Hypothesis and Theory
Methods
Mini Review
Opinion
Original Research
Perspective
Review
Systematic Review
Technology and Code
Keywords: Computational, Neuroscience, Personalized medicine, brain function, Inclusive data representation, Sex bias, Computational Models, Clinical data
Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.