Corrigendum: Post-pandemic planning: do we have enough and efficient access to parks?
Nour Alkhaja† 
Khaled Alawadi- Civil Infrastructure and Environmental Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
A Corrigendum on
Post-pandemic planning: do we have enough and efficient access to parks?
by Alkhaja N, Alawadi K and Ibrahim HM (2023). Front. Built Environ. 9:1158430. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2023.1158430
In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Figure 2 as published. The legend includes a spelling mistake in the word “Aterials.” The correct spelling is “Arterials” and the legend in Figure 2 has been updated to display the correct spelling as “Arterials & Collectors.” The corrected legend appears below.
FIGURE 2. Selected samples showing parks’ locations and the 1-km distance-based service area.
In the published article, there was an error in Table 1 as published. In Table 1, the values in the column titled “Arterials/Collectors Percentage” are incorrectly displayed as zeros for the following samples: Al Rahba, AL Shawamekh, Al Falah, Al Shahma, Shakhbout-2, and MBZ. The correct percentages for arterials and collectors in these samples have been revised as follows: Al Rahba at 34.40, AL Shawamekh at 38.81, Al Falah at 45.82, Al Shahma at 32.20, Shakhbout-2 at 47.12, and MBZ at 52.33. The corrected Table 1 and its caption “Quantified physical attributes for the streets only network scenario” appear below.
TABLE 1. Quantified physical attributes for the streets only network scenario.
In the published article, there was an error in Table 2 as published. In Table 2, the value in the column titled “Network Density” for the East-AD sample was incorrectly listed as 0.18. This has now been revised, and the correct network density value for the East-AD sample is 0.46. The corrected Table 2 and its caption “Quantified physical attributes for the streets and alleyways network scenario” appear below.
TABLE 2. Quantified physical attributes for the streets and alleyways network scenario.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: connectivity, street networks, COVID-19, route directness, route redundancy, Abu-Dhabi, parks, urban form
Citation: Alkhaja N, Alawadi K and Ibrahim HM (2024) Corrigendum: Post-pandemic planning: do we have enough and efficient access to parks?. Front. Built Environ. 10:1352506. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2024.1352506
Received: 08 December 2023; Accepted: 15 January 2024;
Published: 05 February 2024.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2024 Alkhaja, Alawadi and Ibrahim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Khaled Alawadi, khaled.alawadi@ku.ac.ae
†These authors share first authorship