SPECIALTY GRAND CHALLENGE article
Promises and Challenges in Photocatalysis
- State Key Laboratory of Photocatalysis on Energy and Environment, College of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China
Photocatalysis is a Promising Technology for Energy and Environmental Protection
The current rapid industrial development causes both a heavy reliance on non-renewable energy and a dramatic increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration, which in turn lead to severe energy and environmental crises (Zhang et al., 2015; Li et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021). Therefore, it is urgent to consider how to develop new energy to meet the sustainable development of society.
Nowadays, direct solar‐to‐fuel conversion through green photocatalysis technology has received increasing research interests due to its potential for solar energy utilization and storage to relieve the growing energy demands and greenhouse effect (Habisreutinger et al., 2013). With the expansion and deepening of the research, photocatalysis technology has been extended to many fields, such as energy, health, environment, pollution control and value-added chemicals synthesis (Lu et al., 2020). As a result, the relevance of photocatalysis and human life has been increasing steadily.
The grand challenge of photocatalysis today is to further expand the practical application of photocatalytic technology in the industrial field, which requires future research to pay attention to the following aspects:
System-Level Engineering of Photocatalyst
The overall catalytic performance of photocatalyst usually depends on three factors: light harvesting, photogenerated charge carriers separation and transfer, and surface reaction (Han et al., 2019). On the one hand, light absorption is closely related to the energy band structure of photocatalysts. However, most of the existing stable photocatalysts have a wide bandgap, indicating a narrow light absorption range, which restricts the photocatalytic efficiency. On the other hand, only the photogenerated electrons and holes that migrate to the photocatalyst surface can participate in the photocatalytic reaction, whereas most of them are readily recombined in the bulk phase of the photocatalysts. In addition, some photogenerated electrons or holes may corrode the photocatalyst rather than participate in the target reaction.
In the past four decades, a variety of strategies have been proposed to adjust the physical and chemical properties of semiconductor photocatalysts in order to effectively improve the scope of light absorption, reduce the recombination of photogenerated charge carriers, and accelerate surface reactions (Wu et al., 2021). In general, engineering special interfaces in composite photocatalytic systems with diverse individual components to form efficient interactions such as p–n junctions, heterojunctions, and Z-scheme systems is considered to be an effective strategy for enhancing the overall photocatalytic efficiency (Chen et al., 2020; Zuo et al., 2021). Nevertheless, this system-level photocatalyst engineering is clearly a time-consuming process. Therefore, it is important to deepen understanding of structure-activity relationships and various photoredox mechanisms, and the advances in situ characterization technique, theoretical calculation and artificial intelligence may allow this process more efficiently.
Amplification of Photocatalytic Systems
Today, photocatalytic technology has been mainly applied in the treatment of the industrial wastewater, including papermaking, printing, dyeing and electroplating industry, etc. As for other photocatalysis research fields, such as solar water splitting (Mi et al., 2021), photocatalytic CO2 reduction (He et al., 2019), photocatalytic CH4 activation (Ma et al., 2021), nitrogen fixation (Chen et al., 2020), and photocatalytic fine chemicals synthesis (Leng et al., 2020; Tan et al., 2021), they often stuck at the proof-of-concept level.
Although a lot of work has been done on basic photocatalytic research, there is still a certain gap between laboratory and industrial application. Laboratory studies can take no account of the cost, catalyst recycle, energy consumption, environmental protection, and other issues, but only to prove the feasibility and mechanism of the photocatalytic system. However, in the case of amplifying industrial application, there are various uncontrollable factors in the actual production process, and the preparation conditions of the catalysts will not be as controllable and stable as in the laboratory (Tang et al., 2021). Therefore, the development of economical, feasible, and stable large-scale preparation methods is the key to realize the industrial application of photocatalytic systems.
The improvement and optimization of the reactor is also an important factor for the industrial application of photocatalytic technology (Danon et al., 2012; Reilly et al., 2017; Pieber et al., 2018). It is necessary to optimize the system design of the reactor to achieve the optimal photocatalytic efficiency, since a well-designed reactor can not only improve the reaction efficiency, but also reduce the waste of energy and catalyst and improve the economic benefit.
Uniform Efficiency Standards
The lack of a reasonable activity evaluation standard is a huge obstacle to the development of photocatalytic technology. At present, most literatures usually normalize the activity of photocatalysts by their mass or surface area (Qureshi and Takanabe, 2017; Albero et al., 2020). However, this approach is ill-advised, because there is generally no linear correlation between the production rate of the target product and the mass/surface area of the used photocatalyst. In addition, it is worth noting that standards for light sources used in photocatalytic systems vary from country to country, and the reactor and illumination distances commonly used by different groups also varies. Therefore, it is pointless to compare the photocatalytic activity from different literatures based on the yield of the target product alone.
Recently, the authors have apparently recognized this issue, and have tended to compare the photocatalytic activity of different systems using apparent quantum yield (AQY) instead of traditional yield (Wang et al., 2021). This is undoubtedly a good trend, provided that standardized AQY calculation tools or methods are developed.
Is Photocatalysis Green?
Green, clean, low energy consumption and environmental friendliness is the general impression of photocatalytic technology. However, it is undeniable that we often add electrons or hole sacrificial agents, such as triethylamine, tetrachloromethane, lactic acid, triethanolamine, and various alcohols, into the photocatalytic system (Liu et al., 2021). Although the introduction of these scavengers can greatly promote the photocatalytic efficiency, it also causes undesirably product and environmental pollution (Wang et al., 2021). In comparison, integrating certain oxidation reaction with another reduction reaction (Qi et al., 2020; Han et al., 2021), for example, cooperatively coupling benzyl alcohol oxidation with hydrogen production in one system (Qi et al., 2020), may be a better path to simultaneously maintain high reaction efficiency and economic benefits. In this context, we urge all authors to use sacrificial agents with caution.
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Chen, M., Guo, C., Hou, S., Lv, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., et al. (2020). A Novel Z-Scheme AgBr/P-G-C3n4 Heterojunction Photocatalyst: Excellent Photocatalytic Performance and Photocatalytic Mechanism for Ephedrine Degradation. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 266, 118614. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118614
Chen, X., Li, J.-Y., Tang, Z.-R., and Xu, Y.-J. (2020). Surface-defect-engineered Photocatalyst for Nitrogen Fixation into Value-Added Chemical Feedstocks. Catal. Sci. Technol. 10, 6098–6110. doi:10.1039/d0cy01227k
Danon, A., Bhattacharyya, K., Vijayan, B. K., Lu, J., Sauter, D. J., Gray, K. A., et al. (2012). Effect of Reactor Materials on the Properties of Titanium Oxide Nanotubes. ACS Catal. 2, 45–49. doi:10.1021/cs200392m
Habisreutinger, S. N., Schmidt-Mende, L., and Stolarczyk, J. K. (2013). Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2on TiO2 and Other Semiconductors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 7372–7408. doi:10.1002/anie.201207199
Han, C., Li, Y. H., Li, J. Y., Qi, M. Y., Tang, Z. R., and Xu, Y. J. (2021). Cooperative Syngas Production and C−N Bond Formation in One Photoredox Cycle. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 7962–7970. doi:10.1002/anie.202015756
Han, C., Qi, M.-Y., Tang, Z.-R., Gong, J., and Xu, Y.-J. (2019). Gold Nanorods-Based Hybrids with Tailored Structures for Photoredox Catalysis: Fundamental Science, Materials Design and Applications. Nano Today 27, 48–72. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2019.05.001
He, Y., Rao, H., Song, K., Li, J., Yu, Y., Lou, Y., et al. (2019). 3D Hierarchical ZnIn 2 S 4 Nanosheets with Rich Zn Vacancies Boosting Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1905153. doi:10.1002/adfm.201905153
Li, J.-Y., Li, Y.-H., Qi, M.-Y., Lin, Q., Tang, Z.-R., and Xu, Y.-J. (2020). Selective Organic Transformations over Cadmium Sulfide-Based Photocatalysts. ACS Catal. 10, 6262–6280. doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c01567
Li, J.-Y., Yuan, L., Li, S.-H., Tang, Z.-R., and Xu, Y.-J. (2019). One-dimensional Copper-Based Heterostructures toward Photo-Driven Reduction of CO2 to Sustainable Fuels and Feedstocks. J. Mater. Chem. A. 7, 8676–8689. doi:10.1039/c8ta12427b
Liu, Z., Yang, H., Wang, J., Yuan, Y., Hills-Kimball, K., Cai, T., et al. (2021). Synthesis of Lead-Free Cs2AgBiX6 (X = Cl, Br, I) Double Perovskite Nanoplatelets and Their Application in CO2 Photocatalytic Reduction. Nano Lett. 21, 1620–1627. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04148
Lu, K.-Q., Li, Y.-H., Zhang, F., Qi, M.-Y., Chen, X., Tang, Z.-R., et al. (2020). Rationally Designed Transition Metal Hydroxide Nanosheet Arrays on Graphene for Artificial CO2 Reduction. Nat. Commun. 11, 5181. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18944-1
Ma, J., Tan, X., Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., and Wang, L. (2021). Exploring the Size Effect of Pt Nanoparticles on the Photocatalytic Nonoxidative Coupling of Methane. ACS Catal. 11, 3352–3360. doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c04943
Mi, Z., Zhou, T., Weng, W., Unruangsri, J., Hu, K., Yang, W., et al. (2021). Covalent Organic Frameworks Enabling Site Isolation of Viologen‐Derived Electron‐Transfer Mediators for Stable Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 9642–9649. doi:10.1002/anie.202016618
Pieber, B., Shalom, M., Antonietti, M., Seeberger, P. H., and Gilmore, K. (2018). Continuous Heterogeneous Photocatalysis in Serial Micro-batch Reactors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 9976–9979. doi:10.1002/anie.201712568
Qi, M.-Y., Li, Y.-H., Anpo, M., Tang, Z.-R., and Xu, Y.-J. (2020). Efficient Photoredox-Mediated C-C Coupling Organic Synthesis and Hydrogen Production over Engineered Semiconductor Quantum Dots. ACS Catal. 10, 14327–14335. doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c04237
Qi, M.-Y., Li, Y.-H., Zhang, F., Tang, Z.-R., Xiong, Y., and Xu, Y.-J. (2020). Switching Light for Site-Directed Spatial Loading of Cocatalysts onto Heterojunction Photocatalysts with Boosted Redox Catalysis. ACS Catal. 10, 3194–3202. doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b05420
Qureshi, M., and Takanabe, K. (2017). Insights on Measuring and Reporting Heterogeneous Photocatalysis: Efficiency Definitions and Setup Examples. Chem. Mater. 29, 158–167. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02907
Reilly, K., Fang, B., Taghipour, F., and Wilkinson, D. P. (2017). Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production in a UV-Irradiated Fluidized Bed Reactor. J. Catal. 353, 63–73. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2017.07.003
Tan, Y.-X., Chai, Z.-M., Wang, B.-H., Tian, S., Deng, X.-X., Bai, Z.-J., et al. (2021). Boosted Photocatalytic Oxidation of Toluene into Benzaldehyde on CdIn2S4-CdS: Synergetic Effect of Compact Heterojunction and S-Vacancy. ACS Catal. 11, 2492–2503. doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c05703
Tang, X., Rosseler, O., Chen, S., Houzé de l’Aulnoit, S., Lussier, M. J., Zhang, J., et al. (2021). Self-cleaning and De-pollution Efficacies of Photocatalytic Architectural Membranes. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 281, 119260. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119260
Wang, C., Wang, K., Feng, Y., Li, C., Zhou, X., Gan, L., et al. (2021). Co and Pt Dual‐Single‐Atoms with Oxygen‐Coordinated Co-O-pt Dimer Sites for Ultrahigh Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Efficiency. Adv. Mater. 33, 2003327. doi:10.1002/adma.202003327
Wu, H., Kong, X. Y., Wen, X., Chai, S. P., Lovell, E. C., Tang, J., et al. (2021). Metal-Organic Framework Decorated Cuprous Oxide Nanowires for Long‐lived Charges Applied in Selective Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to CH 4. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 8455–8459. doi:10.1002/anie.202015735
Zhang, N., Yang, M.-Q., Liu, S., Sun, Y., and Xu, Y.-J. (2015). Waltzing with the Versatile Platform of Graphene to Synthesize Composite Photocatalysts. Chem. Rev. 115, 10307–10377. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00267
Keywords: photocatalysis, green chemistry, semiconductor, solar energy, economic efficient photocatalysts
Citation: Xu Y-J (2021) Promises and Challenges in Photocatalysis. Front. Catal. 1:708319. doi: 10.3389/fctls.2021.708319
Received: 11 May 2021; Accepted: 17 May 2021;
Published: 28 May 2021.
Edited and Reviewed by:Frank Hollmann, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
Copyright © 2021 Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yi-Jun Xu, firstname.lastname@example.org