Editorial: Biodiversity and conservation of fungi and fungus-like organisms
Danny Haelewaters
Yusufjon Gafforov
Li-Wei Zhou- 1Research Group Mycology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- 2Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czechia
- 3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
- 4Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
- 5AKFA University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
- 6State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Editorial on the Research Topic
Biodiversity and conservation of fungi and fungus-like organisms
The second species-richest group after insects, fungi and fungus-like organisms, play essential roles as saprotrophs, mutualists, and parasites and pathogens. Fungi thrive in almost every ecosystem on earth; the total number of fungal species has been estimated at 1.5 to 6 million (Hawksworth, 1991; Taylor et al., 2014; Hawksworth and Lücking, 2017). However, only 148,000 species, less than 10% of the estimated diversity, are formally described (Hibbett et al., 2016; Cheek et al., 2020). In addition, knowledge is incomplete even for the named species, as their geographic distributions and host ranges are often not fully understood. Finally, phylogenetic relationships among fungi, especially early diverging lineages, lack support and are continuously amended (Naranjo-Ortiz and Gabaldón, 2019; Wijayawardene et al., 2020). These knowledge gaps limit the utilization of fungal resources and the development of pathogenic and parasitic fungi as part of integrated biological control strategies. They also hamper conservation efforts (Gonçalves et al., 2021; Bazzicalupo et al., 2022); if we do not know what is present, how can we protect it?
There is a need to accelerate the description of fungi and fungus-like organisms and to facilitate the conservation of fungi and utilization of their resources. These organisms should be studied and documented with the help of standardized methods, including field monitoring, macro- and micromorphological observations, and molecular phylogenetic reconstructions. In addition, when available, documentation may incorporate data from culture studies and high-throughput sequencing techniques. The integrative (or polyphasic) taxonomy approach – incorporating all available, independent lines of evidence – will further benefit the field in addressing broader questions relating to host specificity patterns, biological control, ecology, and fungal systematics (Cao et al., 2021; Maharachchikumbura et al., 2021). As the mycological community will move forward describing fungal diversity based on recommended best practices (Aime et al., 2021), the Fungal Tree of Life should continue to be populated by taxa with multilocus phylogenetic data and, where available, phylogenomic data (McLaughlin et al., 2009; Spatafora et al., 2017; James et al., 2020).
Each paper in this Research Topic is closely tied to promoting fungal biodiversity and conservation. In their perspective, Cazabonne et al. call for integrating field inventory studies and molecular methods (also see Truong et al., 2017). The authors point out the importance of field-based research for taxonomy, documentation of new geographic records, ecology, culturing approaches, fungarium collections, checklists, and training of junior mycologists as well as parataxonomists. Stallman and Robinson focus on phenological patterns of Hawaiian mushrooms and, based on their results, suggest adding seasonality data to IUCN Red List assessments.
Some taxonomic and functional groups of fungi have traditionally been neglected. Examples are the arthropod-associated Laboulbeniomycetes (Haelewaters et al., 2022), early-diverging fungi (Spatafora et al., 2016), and fungal hyperparasites. Van Caenegem et al. study Laboulbeniales microfungi associated with ladybirds using morphology, single-locus and multilocus phylogeny, and host association. The authors show that segregation of species within the Hesperomyces virescens species complex is governed not only by host but also by a geographic component. Bermúdez-Cova et al. present a checklist of hyperparasitic fungi in association with black mildews (Meliolales, Sordariomycetes). Their review reveals an assemblage of seven morphological groups that are poorly represented in public sequence databases. Finally, Blaalid and Davey focus on overlooked fungal diversity of protected coastal heathland sites in Norway. The authors discuss incorporating fungi into holistic conservation strategies based on well-developed protocols, involving standardized monitoring and carefully designed sampling strategies to provide reliable biodiversity estimates.
Author contributions
DH: writing—original draft and visualization. DH, YG, and L-WZ: writing—review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
We received support from the Research Foundation–Flanders (Junior Postdoctoral Fellowship 1206620N to DH), the State Scientific and Technical Program of the Republic of Uzbekistan (2021–2024, YG), and the Ministry of Innovative Development of the Republic of Uzbekistan (project no. AL 2021090820 to YG).
Acknowledgments
We thank the 15 authors and 12 reviewers and editors who contributed to this Research Topic, as well as the staff at both Frontiers journals for administrative and editorial support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Aime M. C., Miller A. N., Aoki T., Bensch K., Cai L., Crous P. W., et al. (2021). How to publish a new fungal species, or name, version 3.0. IMA Fungus 12, 11. doi: 10.1186/s43008-021-00063-1
Bazzicalupo A., Gonçalves S. C., Hébert R., Jakob S., Justo A., Kernaghan G., et al. (2022). Macrofungal conservation in Canada and target species for assessment: A starting point. Facets 7, 448–463. doi: 10.1139/facets-2021-0180
Cao B., Haelewaters D., Schoutteten N., Begerow D., Boekhout T., Giachini A. J., et al. (2021). Delimiting species in basidiomycota: A review. Fungal Divers. 109, 181–237. doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00479-5
Cheek M., Nic Lughadha E., Kirk P., Lindon H., Carretero J., Looney B., et al. (2020). New scientific discoveries: Plants and fungi. Plants People Planet 2, 371–388. doi: 10.1002/ppp3.10148
Gonçalves S. C., Haelewaters D., Furci G., Mueller G. M. (2021). Include all fungi in biodiversity goals. Science 373, 403. doi: 10.1126/science.abk1312
Haelewaters D., Lubbers M., De Kesel A. (2022). The haustorium as a driving force for speciation in thallus-forming laboulbeniomycetes. IMA Fungus 13, 1. doi: 10.1186/s43008-021-00087-7
Hawksworth D. L. (1991). The fungal dimension of biodiversity: Magnitude, significance, and conservation. Mycol. Res. 95, 641–655. doi: 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80810-1
Hawksworth D. L., Lücking R. (2017). Fungal diversity revisited: 2.2 to 3.8 million species. Microbiol. Spectr. 5, FUNK-0052–2016. doi: 10.1128/9781555819583.ch4
Hibbett D., Abarenkov K., Kõljalg U., Öpik M., Chai B., Cole J., et al. (2016). Sequence-based classification and identification of fungi. Mycologia 108, 1049–1068. doi: 10.3852/16-130
James T. Y., Stajich J. E., Hittinger C. T., Rokas A. (2020). Toward a fully resolved fungal tree of life. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 74, 291–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-022020-051835
Maharachchikumbura S. S. N., Chen Y., Ariyawansa H. A., Hyde K. D., Haelewaters D., Perera R. H., et al. (2021). Integrative approaches for species delimitation in ascomycota. Fungal Divers. 109, 155–179. doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00486-6
McLaughlin D. J., Hibbett D. S., Lutzoni F., Spatafora J. W., Vilgalys R. (2009). The search for the fungal tree of life. Trends Microbiol. 17, 488–497. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2009.08.001
Naranjo-Ortiz M. A., Gabaldón T. (2019). Fungal evolution: Diversity, taxonomy and phylogeny of the fungi. Biol. Rev. 94, 2101–2137. doi: 10.1111/brv.12550
Spatafora J. W., Aime M. C., Grigoriev I. V., Martin F., Stajich J. E., Blackwell M. (2017). “The fungal tree of life: from molecular systematics to genome-scale phylogenies,” in The fungal kingdom. Eds. Heitman J., Howlett B. J., Crous P. W., Stukenbrock E. H., James T. Y., Gow N. A. R. (Washington, DC: ASM Press), 1–34. doi: 10.1128/9781555819583.ch1
Spatafora J. W., Chang Y., Benny G. L., Lazarus K., Smith M. E., Berbee M. L., et al. (2016). A phylum-level phylogenetic classification of zygomycete fungi based on genome-scale data. Mycologia 108, 1028–1046. doi: 10.3852/16-042
Taylor D. L., Hollingsworth T. N., McFarland J. W., Lennon N. J., Nusbaum C., Ruess R. W. (2014). A first comprehensive census of fungi in soil reveals both hyperdiversity and fine-scale niche partitioning. Ecol. Monogr. 84, 3–20. doi: 10.1890/12-1693.1
Truong C., Mujic A. B., Healy R., Kuhar F., Furci G., Torres D., et al. (2017). How to know the fungi: Combining field inventories and DNA-barcoding to document fungal diversity. New Phytol. 214, 913–919. doi: 10.1111/nph.14509
Keywords: dark taxa, funga, fungal conservation, fungal diversity, integrative taxonomy approach, phenology
Citation: Haelewaters D, Gafforov Y and Zhou L-W (2022) Editorial: Biodiversity and conservation of fungi and fungus-like organisms. Front. Fungal Biol. 3:973249. doi: 10.3389/ffunb.2022.973249
Received: 19 June 2022; Accepted: 21 November 2022;
Published: 14 December 2022.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Toni Gabaldón, Barcelona Supercomputing Center, SpainCopyright © 2022 Haelewaters, Gafforov and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yusufjon Gafforov, yugafforov@yahoo.com; Li-Wei Zhou, liwei_zhou1982@im.ac.cn
†ORCID: Danny Haelewaters, orcid.org/0000-0002-6424-0834
Yusufjon Gafforov, orcid.org/0000-0003-3076-4709
Li-Wei Zhou, orcid.org/0000-0002-2851-2839