Impact Factor 3.517 | CiteScore 3.60
More on impact ›

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Genet., 06 December 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01223

Towards Improved Molecular Identification Tools in Fine Fescue (Festuca L., Poaceae) Turfgrasses: Nuclear Genome Size, Ploidy, and Chloroplast Genome Sequencing

Yinjie Qiu1*, Cory D. Hirsch2, Ya Yang3 and Eric Watkins1
  • 1Department of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States
  • 2Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States
  • 3Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States

Fine fescues (Festuca L., Poaceae) are turfgrass species that perform well in low-input environments. Based on morphological characteristics, the most commonly-utilized fine fescues are divided into five taxa: three are subspecies within F. rubra L. and the remaining two are treated as species within the F. ovina L. complex. Morphologically, these five taxa are very similar; both identification and classification of fine fescues remain challenging. In an effort to develop identification methods for fescues, we used flow cytometry to estimate genome size and ploidy level and sequenced the chloroplast genome of all five taxa. Fine fescue chloroplast genome sizes ranged from 133,331 to 133,841 bp and contained 113–114 genes. Phylogenetic relationship reconstruction using whole chloroplast genome sequences agreed with previous work based on morphology. Comparative genomics suggested unique repeat signatures for each fine fescue taxon that could potentially be used for marker development for taxon identification.

Introduction

With ca. 450 species, Fescues (Festuca L., Poaceae) is a large and diverse genus of perennial grasses (Clayton and Renvoize, 1986). Fescue species are distributed mostly in temperate zones of both the northern and southern hemispheres, but most commonly found in the northern hemisphere (Jenkin, 1959). Several of the fescue species have been commonly used as turfgrass. Based on both leaf morphology and nuclear ITS sequences, fescue species can be divided into two groups: broad-leaved fescues and fine-leaved fescues (Torrecilla and Catalán, 2002). Broad-leaved fescues commonly used as turfgrass include tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.). Fine-leaved fescues are a group of cool-season grasses that include five commonly used taxa called fine fescues. Fine fescues include hard fescue (Festuca brevipila Tracey, 2n = 6x = 42), sheep fescue (Festuca ovina L., 2n = 4x = 28), strong creeping red fescue (Festuca rubra ssp. rubra 2n = 8x = 56), slender creeping red fescue [F. rubra ssp. litoralis (G. Mey.) Auquier 2n = 6x = 42], and Chewings fescue [F. rubra ssp. fallax (Thuill.) Nyman 2n = 6x = 42] (Ruemmele et al., 1995). All five taxa share very fine and narrow leaves and have been used for forage, turf, and ornamental purposes. They are highly tolerant to shade and drought and prefer low pH (5.5-6.5) and low fertility soils (Beard, 1972). Additionally, fine fescues grow well in the shade or sun, have reduced mowing requirements, and do not need additional fertilizer or supplemental irrigation (Ruemmele et al., 1995).

Based on morphological and cytological features, fine fescues are currently divided into two groups referred to as the F. rubra complex (includes F. rubra ssp. litoralis, F. rubra ssp. rubra, and F. rubra ssp. fallax) and the non-rhizomatous F. ovina complex (includes F. brevipila and F. ovina) (Ruemmele et al., 1995). While it is relatively easy to separate fine fescue taxa into their proper complex based on the presence and absence of rhizome, it is challenging to identify taxon within the same complex. In the F. rubra complex, both ssp. litoralis and ssp. rubra are rhizomatous, while ssp. fallax is non-rhizomatous. However, the separation of ssp. litoralis from ssp. rubra using rhizome length is challenging. Taxon identification within the F. ovina complex relies heavily on leaf characters; however, abundant morphological and ecotype diversity within F. ovina makes taxa identification difficult (Piper, 1906). This is further complicated by inconsistent identification methods between different continents. For example, in the United States, sheep fescue is described as having a bluish gray leaf color and hard fescue leaf blade color is considered green (Beard, 1972), while in Europe, it is the opposite (Hubbard, 1968). Because the ploidy level of the five taxa varies from tetraploid to octoploid, beyond morphological classifications, laser flow cytometry has been used to determine ploidy level of fine fescues and some other fescue species (Huff and Palazzo, 1998). A wide range of DNA contents within each complex suggests that the evolutionary history of each named species is complicated, and interspecific hybridization might interfere with species determination using this approach. Plant breeders have been working to improve fine fescues for turf use for several decades, with germplasm improvement efforts focused on disease resistance, traffic tolerance, and ability to perform well under heat stress (Casler, 2003). Turfgrass breeders have utilized germplasm collections from old turf areas as a source of germplasm (Bonos and Huff, 2013); however, confirming the taxon identity in these collections has been challenging. A combination of molecular markers and flow cytometry could be a valuable tool for breeders to identify fine fescue germplasm (Hebert et al., 2003).

Due to the complex polyploidy history of fine fescues, sequencing plastid genomes provides a more cost-effective tool for taxon identification than the nuclear genome because it is often maternally inherited, lacks heterozygosity, is present in high copies, and is usable even in partially degraded material (Bryan et al., 1999; Provan et al., 2001). Previous studies have developed universal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers to amplify non-coding polymorphic regions for DNA barcoding in plants for species identification (Baldwin et al., 1995; Demesure et al., 1995). However, the polymorphisms discovered from these regions are often single nucleotide polymorphisms that are difficult to apply using PCR screening methods. For these reasons, it would be helpful to assemble chloroplast genomes and identify simple sequence repeat (SSR) and tandem repeats polymorphisms. Chloroplast genome sequencing has been simplified due to improved sequencing technology. In turfgrass species, high throughput sequencing has been used to assemble the chloroplast genomes of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne cv. Cashel) (Diekmann et al., 2009), tall fescue (Lolium arundinacea cv. Schreb) (Cahoon et al., 2010), diploid F. ovina, F. pratensis, Festuca altissima (Hand et al., 2013), and bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) (Huang et al., 2017). To date, there is limited molecular biology information on fine fescue taxon identification and their phylogenetic position among other turfgrass species (Hand et al., 2013; Cheng et al., 2016). In this study, we used flow cytometry to confirm the ploidy level of five fine fescue cultivars, each representing one of the five commonly utilized fine fescue taxa. We then reported the complete chloroplast genome sequences of these five taxa and carried out comparative genomics and phylogenetic inference. Based on the genome sequence we identified unique genome features among fine fescue taxa and predicted taxon specific SSR and tandem repeat loci for molecular marker development.

Results

Species Ploidy Level Confirmation

We used flow cytometry to estimate the ploidy levels of five fine fescue taxa by measuring the DNA content in each nucleus. DNA content was reflected by the flow cytometry mean PI-A value. Overall, fine fescue taxa had mean PI-A values roughly from 110 to 180 (Figure 1 and Figure S1). F. rubra ssp. rubra cv. Navigator II (2n = 8x = 56) had the highest mean PI-A value (181.434, %rCV 4.4). F. rubra ssp. litoralis cv. Shoreline (2n = 6x = 42) and F. rubra ssp. fallax cv. Treazure II (2n = 6x = 42) had similar mean PI-A values of 137.852, %rCV 3.7 and 145.864, %rCV 3.5, respectively. F. brevipila cv. Beacon (2n = 6x = 42) had a mean PI-A of 165.25, %rCV 1.9, while F. ovina cv. Quatro (2n = 4x = 28) had a mean PI-A of 108.43, %rCV 2.9. Standard reference L. perenne cv. Artic Green (2n = 2x = 14) had a G1 phase mean PI-A of 63.91, %rCV 3.0. USDA F. ovina PI 230246 (2n = 2x = 14) had a G1 mean PI-A of 52.73 (histogram not shown). The estimated genome size of USDA PI 230246 was 4.67 pg/2C. Estimated ploidy level of F. brevipila cv. Beacon was 6.3, F. ovina cv. Quatro was 4.11, F. rubra ssp. rubra cv. Navigator II was 6.9, F. rubra ssp. litoralis cv. Shoreline was 5.2, and F. rubra ssp. fallax cv. Treazure II was 5.5 (Table 1). All newly estimated ploidy levels roughly correspond to previously reported ploidy levels based on chromosome counts.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Flow cytometry results for the five fine fescue taxa. Lolium perenne (2n = 2x = 14) was used as the reference. Flow cytometry was able to separate F. rubra ssp. rubra from the other two taxa in the F. rubra complex. The mean PI-A values of F. rubra ssp. fallax and F. rubra ssp. litoralis were similar (145.86 to 137.85).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Summary of flow cytometry statistics, genome size, and ploidy level estimation of fine fescue species. Lolium perenne 2C DNA content was used to calculate fine fescue and USDA F. ovina PI 230246 genome size, and calculated PI 230246 DNA content was used as reference to infer fine fescue ploidy level.

Plastid Genome Assembly and Annotation of Five Fescue Taxa

A total of 47,843,878 reads were produced from the five fine fescue taxa. After Illumina adaptor removal, we obtained 47,837,438 reads. The assembled chloroplast genomes ranged from 133,331 to 133,841 bp. The large single copy (LSC) and small single copy (SSC) regions were similar in size between the sequenced fine fescue accessions (78 kb and 12 kb, respectively). F. ovina and F. brevipila in the F. ovina complex had exactly the same size inverted repeat (IR) region (42,476 bp). In the F. rubra complex, F. rubra ssp. rubra and F. rubra ssp. litoralis had the same IR size (21,235 bp). Species in the F. rubra complex had a larger chloroplast genome size compared to species in the F. ovina complex. All chloroplast genomes shared similar GC content (38.4%) (Figure 2, Table 2). The fine fescue chloroplast genomes encoded for 113-114 genes, including 37 transfer RNAs (tRNA), 4 ribosomal RNAs (rRNA), and 72 protein-coding genes (Table 2). Genome structures were similar among all five fine fescue taxa sequenced, except that the pseudogene accD was annotated in all three subspecies of F. rubra, but not in the F. ovina complex (Table S1).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Whole chloroplast genome structure of F. ovina complex (A) and F. rubra complex (B). Genes inside the circle are transcribed clockwise, and genes outside are transcribed counter-clockwise. Genes belong to different functional groups are color coded. GC content is represented by the dark gray inner circle, and the light gray corresponded to the AT content. IRA(B), inverted repeat A(B); LSC, large single copy region; SSC, small single copy region.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 Characteristics of fine fescue chloroplast genomes.

Chloroplast Genome IR Expansion and Contraction

Contraction and expansion of the IR regions resulted in the size variation of chloroplast genomes. We examined the four junctions in the chloroplast genomes, LSC/IRa, LSC/IRb, SSC/IRa, and SSC/IRb of the fine fescue and the model turfgrass species L. perenne. Although the chloroplast genome of fine fescue taxa was highly similar, some structural variations were still found in the IR/LSC and IR/SSC boundary. Similar to L. perenne, fine fescue taxa chloroplast genes rpl22-rps19, rps19-psbA were located in the junction of IR and LSC; rps15-ndhF and ndhH-rps15 were located in the junction of IR/SSC. In the F. ovina complex, the rps19 gene was 37 bp into the LSC/IRb boundary while in the F. rubra complex and L. perenne, the rps19 gene was 36 bp into the LSC/IRb boundary (Figure 3). The rsp15 gene was 308 bp from the IRb/SSC boundary in F. ovina complex, 307 bp in F. rubra complex, and 302 bp in L. perenne. Both the ndhH and the pseudogene fragment of the ndhH (⨚ndhH) genes spanned the junction of the IR/SSC. The ⨚ndhH gene crossed the IRb/SSC boundary with 32 bp into SSC in F. brevipila and F. ovina, 9 bp in F. rubra ssp. rubra and F. rubra ssp. litoralis, 10 bp in F. rubra ssp. fallax, and 7 bp in L. perenne. The ndhF gene was 88 bp from the IRb/SSC boundary in F. brevipila and F. ovina, 91 bp in F. rubra ssp. rubra, 84 bp in F. rubra ssp. litoralis, 77 bp in F. rubra ssp. fallax, and 102 bp in L. perenne. Finally, the psbA gene was 87 bp apart from the IRa/LSC boundary into the LSC in L. perenne and F. ovina complex taxa but 83 bp in the F. rubra complex taxa.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Comparison for border positions of LSC, SSC, and IR regions among five fine fescues and L. perenne. Genes are denoted by boxes, and the gap between the genes and the boundaries is indicated by the number of bases unless the gene coincides with the boundary. Extensions of genes are also indicated above the boxes.

Whole Chloroplast Genome Comparison and Repetitive Element Identification

Genome-wide comparison among five fine fescue taxa showed high sequence similarity with most variations located in intergenic regions (Figure 4). To develop markers for species screening, we predicted a total of 217 SSR markers for fine fescue taxa sequenced (F. brevipila 39; F. ovina 45; F. rubra ssp. rubra 45; F. rubra ssp. litoralis 46; F. rubra ssp. fallax 42) that included 17 different repeat types for the fine fescue species (Figure 5, Table S2). The most frequent repeat type was A/T repeats, followed by AT/AT. The pentamer AAATT/AATTT repeat was only presented in the rhizomatous F. rubra ssp. litoralis and F. rubra ssp. rubra, while ACCAT/ATGGT was only found in F. ovina complex species F. brevipila and F. ovina. Similar to SSR loci prediction, we also predicted long repeats for the fine fescue species and identified a total of 171 repeated elements ranging in size from 20 to 51 bp (Figure 5B, Table S3). Complementary (C) matches were only identified in F. brevipila and F. ovina. F. rubra species had more palindromic (P) and reverse (R) matches. A number of forward (F) matches were similar between five taxa. Selected polymorphic regions were validated by PCR and gel electrophoresis assay (Figure S2).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Sequence identity plot of fine fescues chloroplast genome sequences with F. ovina (2x) as the reference using mVISTA. A cut-off of 70% identify was used for the plots, and the percent of identity varies from 50% to 100% as noted on the y-axis. Most of the sequence variations between fine fescues were in intergenic regions. Taxa in the F. ovina complex, F. brevipila, and F. ovina showed high sequence similarity. Similarly, subspecies within F. rubra complex also showed high sequence similarity.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 (A) SSR repeat type and numbers in the five fine fescue taxa sequenced. Single nucleotide repeat type has the highest frequency. No hexanucleotide repeats were identified in the fine fescue chloroplast genomes sequenced. One penta-nucleotide repeat type (AAATT/AATTT) is unique to F. rubra ssp. rubra and F. rubra ssp. litoralis. One penta-nucleotide repeat type (ACCAT/ATGGT) is unique to F. brevipila and F. ovina. (B) Long repeats sequences in fine fescue chloroplast genomes. Complement (C) match was only identified in the F. ovina complex. Reverse (R) match has the most number variation in fine fescues.

SNP and InDel Distribution in the Coding Sequence of Five Fine Fescue Species

To identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs, non-reference allele in this content), we used the diploid F. ovina chloroplast genome (JX871940.1) as the reference for the mapping and used the genome annotation file to identify genic and non-genic SNPs. The total genic and non-genic sequence of (JX871940.1) were 60,582 and 72,583 bp, respectively. We found SNP polymorphisms were over-present within intergenic regions in the F. ovina complex (∼0.3 SNP/Kbp more), while were under-present in the F. rubra complex (∼0.5 SNP/Kbp less). Most InDels were located in intergenic regions of the fine fescue species (Table 3). Between F. ovina and the F. rubra complex, the ropC2 gene had the most SNPs (4 vs 31). The rbcL gene also has a high level of variation (1 vs 14.3). In addition, rpoB, ccsA, NADH dehydrogenase subunit genes (ndhH, ndhF, ndhA), and ATPase subunit genes (atpA, atpB, aptF) also showed variation between F. ovina and F. rubra complexes. Less SNP and InDel variation were found within each complex (Table 3, Tables S4 and S5).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 Distribution of SNPs and InDels for the five fine fescue taxa sequenced in this study.

Nucleotide Diversity Calculation

A sliding window analysis successfully detected highly variable regions in the fine fescue chloroplast genomes (Figure 6, Table S6). The average nucleotide diversity (Pi) among fine fescue taxa was relatively low (0.00318). The IR region showed lower variability than the LSC and SSC region. There were several divergent loci having a Pi value greater than 0.01 (psbK-psbI, trnfM-trnE, trnC-rpoB, psbH-petB, trnL-trnF, trnS-rps4, aptB-rbcL-psaI, and rpl32-trnL), but mostly within intergenic regions. The rbcL-psaI region contained a highly variable accD-like region in some fine fescue taxa, so we looked at the structural variation of 10 taxa in the Festuca-Lolium complex. We found taxa in broad-leaved fescue and F. rubra complex had similar structure, while F. ovina (2x, 4x) and F. brevipila had a 276 bp deletion in the rbcL-psaI intergenic region (Figure 7).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6 Sliding window analysis of fine fescue whole chloroplast genomes. Window size: 600 bp, step size: 200 bp. X-axis: the position of the midpoint of a window (kb). Y-axis: nucleotide diversity of each window. Inverted repeat regions are highlighted in gray. rpl32-trnL region has the most nucleotide diversity followed by psbH- petB-trnL-trnF-trnS-rps4 region.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7 The alignment of rbcL-psaI intergenic sequence shows that the pseudogene accD is missing in both F. ovina (2x, 4x) and F. brevipila but present in the F. rubra complex and other species examined in this study. Species were ordered by complexes.

Phylogenetic Reconstruction of Fine Fescue Species

We reconstructed the phylogenetic relationships of taxa within the Festuca-Lolium complex using the chloroplast genomes sequenced in our study and eight publicly available complete chloroplast genomes including six taxa within the Festuca-Lolium complex (Figure 8). The dataset included 125,824 aligned characters, of which 3,923 were parsimony-informative and 91.11% characters are constant. The five fine fescue taxa were split into two clades ([ML]BS = 100). In the F. ovina complex, two F. ovina accessions included in the phylogenetic analysis, a diploid one from GenBank, and a tetraploid one newly sequenced in this study are paraphyletic to F. brevipila ([ML]BS = 100). All three subspecies of F. rubra formed a strongly supported clade ([ML]BS = 100). Together they are sisters to the F. ovina complex ([ML]BS = 100).

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8 Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogram of the Festuca-Lolium complex with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Fine fescues were grouped into previous named complexes (F. ovina and F. rubra), sister to broad leaved fescues in the Festuca-Lolium complex.

Discussion

In this study, we used flow cytometry to determine the ploidy level of five fine fescue cultivars, assembled the chloroplast genomes for each, and identified structural variation and mutation hotspots. We also identified candidate loci for marker development to facilitate fine fescue species identification. Additionally, we reconstructed the phylogenetic relationships of the Festuca-Lolium complex using plastid genome information generated in this study along with other publicly-available plastid genomes.

While most crop plants are highly distinctive from their close relatives, Festuca is a species-rich genus that contains species with highly similar morphology and different ploidy level. Consequently, it is difficult for researchers to interpret species identity. In our case, flow cytometry was able to successfully separate fine fescue taxa F. brevipila cv. Beacon, F. ovina cv. Quatro and F. rubra ssp. rubra cv. Navigator II based on the estimated ploidy levels. However, it is difficult to distinguish between F. rubra ssp. litoralis cv. Shoreline and F. rubra ssp. fallax cv. Treazure II as they had similar PI-A values based on flow cytometry.

We noticed that the average mean PI-A of the diploid L. perenne (63.91) was higher than the mean PI-A of diploid F. ovina (52.73), suggesting that F. ovina taxa have smaller genome size than L. perenne. The ploidy estimation in the F. ovina complex is fairly consistent, while the estimations of genome sizes in the F. rubra complex are smaller than we expected, even though these two complexes are closely related. Indeed, a similar finding was reported by Huff et al. (Huff and Palazzo, 1998) who reported that F. brevipila has a larger genome size than F. rubra ssp. litoralis and F. rubra ssp. fallax, both of which have the same ploidy level as F. brevipila. The range of variation in DNA content within each complex suggest a complicated evolutionary history in addition to polyploidization (Huff and Palazzo, 1998).

When we cannot identify taxon based on the ploidy level, we need different approaches to identify them. The presence and absence of rhizome formation could be taken into consideration; for example, F. rubra ssp. fallax cv. Treazure II is a bunch type turfgrass, while F. rubra ssp. litoralis cv. Shoreline forms short and slender rhizomes (Meyer and Funk, 1989). This method may not be effective because rhizome formation can be greatly affected by environmental conditions (Yang et al., 2015; Ma and Huang, 2016).

To further develop molecular tools to facilitate species identification, we carried out chloroplast genome sequencing. We assembled the complete chloroplast genomes of five low-input turfgrass fine fescues using Illumina sequencing. Overall, the chloroplast genomes had high sequence and structure similarity among all five fine fescue taxa sequenced, especially within each complex. All five chloroplast genomes share similar gene content except for the three species in the F. rubra complex that have a pseudogene Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase carboxyl transferase subunit (accD). The accD pseudogene is either partially or completely absent in some monocots. Instead, a nuclear-encoded ACC enzyme has been found to replace the plastic accD gene function in some angiosperm linage (Rousseau-Gueutin et al., 2013). Indeed, even though the accD pseudogene is missing in the F. brevipila chloroplast genome, the gene transcript was identified in a transcriptome sequencing dataset (unpublished data), suggesting that this gene has been translocated to nucleus genome. Previous studies have shown that broad-leaf fescues, L. perenne, O. sativa, and H. vulgare all had the pseudogene accD gene, while it was absent in diploid F. ovina, Z. mays, S. bicolor, T. aestivum, and B. distachyon (Hand et al., 2013). Broad-leaf and fine-leaf fescues diverged around 9 Mya ago (Fjellheim et al., 2006), which raises an interesting question about the mechanisms of the relocation of accD among closely related taxa in the Festuca-Lolium complex and even within fine fescue species.

In plants, chloroplast genomes are generally considered "single copy" and lack recombination due to maternal inheritance (Ebert and Peakall, 2009). For this reason, chloroplast genomes are convenient for developing genetic markers for distinguishing species and subspecies. We have identified a number of repeat signatures that are unique to a single species or species complex in fine fescue. For example, complement match is only identified in F. ovina complex, and F. rubra complex has more reversed matches. We also identified two SSR repeats unique to each of the two complexes. The first one consists of AAATT/AATTT repeat units is unique to F. rubra ssp. litoralis and F. rubra ssp. rubra, and the second one consists of ACCAT/ATGGT repeat units is unique to F. brevipila and F. ovina. In cases like the identification of hexaploids F. brevipila, F. rubra ssp. fallax, and F. rubra ssp. litoralis, it is critical to have these diagnostic repeats given all three taxa share similar PI-A values from flow cytometry. Taxon-specific tandem repeats could also aid the SSR repeats for species identification. We used chloroplast sequence developed candidate primer sets to solve the problem. Primer set (1) provided a clear separation of F. rubra ssp. litoralis cv. Shoreline and F. rubra ssp. fallax cv. Treazure II when flow cytometry was not able to separate them. Primer set (2) provided clear separation of F. brevipila cv. Beacon and F. ovina cv. Quatro, which provided an alternative method for F. ovina complex taxa identification. By combining both flow cytometry and candidate primer sets developed in this study, researchers will be able to identify fine fescue taxa within and between two complexes.

Nucleotide diversity analysis suggested that several variable genome regions exist among the five fine fescue taxa sequenced in this study. These variable regions included previously known highly variable chloroplast regions such as trnL-trnF and rpl32-trnL (Demesure et al., 1995; Dong et al., 2012). These regions have undergone rapid nucleotide substitution and are potentially informative molecular markers for characterization of fine fescue species.

Phylogeny inferred from DNA sequence is valuable for understanding the evolutionary context of a species. The phylogenetic relationship of fine fescue using whole plastid genome sequences agrees with previous classification based on genome size estimation and morphology (Huff and Palazzo, 1998; Cheng et al., 2016). The F. ovina complex includes F. ovina and F. brevipila and the F. rubra complex includes F. rubra ssp. rubra, F. rubra ssp. litoralis and F. rubra ssp. fallax, with the two rhizomatous subspecies (ssp. rubra and ssp. literalis) being sister to each other. Within the Festuca-Lolium complex, fine fescues are monophyletic and together sister to a clade consists of broad-leaved fescues and Lolium. In our analysis, F. brevipila (6x) is nested within F. ovina and sister to the diploid F. ovina. It is likely that F. brevipila arose from the hybridization between F. ovina (2x) and F. ovina (4x). Considering the complex evolutionary history of this genus, further research using nuclear loci sequences are needed to provide a more accurate phylogeny tree and validate this hypothesis.

The diversity of fine fescue provides valuable genetic diversity for breeding and cultivar development. Breeding fine fescue cultivars for better disease resistance, heat tolerance, and traffic tolerance could be achieved through screening wild accessions and by introgressing desired alleles into elite cultivars. Some work has been done using Festuca accessions in the USDA Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN) (https://www.ars-grin.gov) to breed for improved forage production in fescue species (Robbins et al., 2016). To date, there are 229 F. ovina and 486 F. rubra accessions in the USDA GRIN. To integrate this germplasm into breeding programs, plant breeders and other researchers need to confirm the ploidy level using flow cytometry and further identify them using molecular markers. Resources developed in this study could provide the tools to screen the germplasm accessions and refine the species identification so breeders can efficiently use these materials for breeding and genetics improvement of fine fescue species.

Materials and Methods

Plant Material

Seeds from the fine fescue cultivars were obtained from the 2014 National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (www.ntep.org, USA) and planted in the Plant Growth Facility at the University of Minnesota, St. Paul campus under 16 h daylight (25°C) and 8 h dark (16°C) with weekly fertilization. Single genotypes of F. brevipila cv. Beacon, F. rubra ssp. litoralis cv. Shoreline, F. rubra ssp. rubra cv. Navigator II, F. rubra ssp. fallax cv. Treazure II, and F. ovina cv. Quatro were selected and used for chloroplast genome sequencing.

Flow Cytometry

To determine the ploidy level of the cultivars used for sequencing and compare them to previous work (2n = 4x = 28: F. ovina; 2n = 6x = 42: F. rubra ssp. litoralis, F. rubra ssp. fallax, and F. brevipila; 2n = 8x = 56: F. rubra ssp. rubra), flow cytometry was carried out using Lolium perenne cv. Artic Green (2n = 2x = 14) as the reference. Samples were prepared using CyStain PI Absolute P (Sysmex, product number 05-5022). Briefly, to prepare the staining solution for each sample, 12 µl propidium iodide (PI) was added to 12 ml of Cystain UV Precise P staining buffer with 6 µl RNase A. To prepare plant tissue, a total size of 0.5 cm x 0.5 cm leaf sample of the selected fine fescue was excised into small pieces using a razor blade in 500 µl CyStain UV Precise P extraction buffer and passed through a 50 µm size filter (Sysmex, product number 04-004-2327). The staining solution was added to the flow-through to stain nuclei in each sample. Samples were stored on ice before loading the flow cytometer. Flow cytometry was carried out using the BD LSRII H4760 (LSRII) instrument with PI laser detector using 480V with 2,000 events at the University of Minnesota Flow Cytometry Resource (UCRF). Data was visualized and analyzed on BD FACSDiva 8.0.1 software. To estimate the genome size, L. perenne DNA (5.66 pg/2C) was used as standard (Arumuganathan et al., 1999), and USDA PI 230246 (2n = 2x = 14) was used as diploid fine fescue relative (unpublished data). To infer fine fescues ploidy, estimation was done using equations (1) and (2) (Doležel et al., 2007).

Sample 2C DNA Content=Standard 2C DNA Content(pg DNA)×(Sample G1 Peak Mean)(Standard G1 Peak Mean)(1)
Sample Ploidy=2n×Sample pg/NucleusDiploid Relative pg/Nucleus(2)

DNA Extraction and Sequencing

To extract DNA for chloroplast genome sequencing, 1 g of fresh leaves was collected from each genotype and DNA was extracted using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, USA) following manufacturer instructions. DNA quality was examined on 0.8% agarose gel and quantified via PicoGreen (Thermo Fisher, Catalog number: P11496). Sequencing libraries were constructed by NovoGene, Inc. (Davis, CA) using Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina) and sequenced in 150 bp paired-end mode, using the HiSeq X Ten platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) with an average of 10 million reads per sample. All reads used in this study were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject PRJNA512126.

Chloroplast Genome Assembly and Annotation

Raw reads were trimmed of Illumina adaptor sequences using Trimmomatic (v. 0.32) (Bolger et al., 2014). Chloroplast genomes were de novo assembled using NovoPlasty v. 2.0 (Dierckxsens et al., 2016). Briefly, rbcL gene sequence from diploid F. ovina (NCBI accession number: JX871940) was extracted and used as the seed to initiate the assembly. NovoPlasty assembler configuration was set as follows: k-mer size = 39; insert size = auto; insert range = 1.8; and insert range strict 1.3. Reads with quality score above 25 were used to complete the guided assembly using F. ovina (NCBI accession number: JX871940) as the reference. Assembled plastid genomes for each taxon were manually corrected by inspecting the alignments of reads used in the assembly. The assembled chloroplast genomes were deposited under BioProject PRJNA512126, GenBank accession numbers MN309822-MN309826.

The assembled chloroplast genomes were annotated using the GeSeq pipeline (Tillich et al., 2017) and corrected using DOGMA online interface (https://dogma.ccbb.utexas.edu) (Wyman et al., 2004). BLAT [a BLAST-like alignment tool (Kent, 2002)] protein, tRNA, rRNA, and DNA search identity threshold was set at 80% in the GeSeq pipeline using the default reference database with the generate codon-based alignments option turned on. tRNAs were also predicted via tRNAscan-SE v2.0 and ARAGORN v 1.2.38 using the bacterial/plant chloroplast genetic code (Lowe and Eddy, 1997; Laslett and Canback, 2004). The final annotation was manually inspected and corrected using results from both pipelines. The circular chloroplast map was drawn by the OrganellarGenomeDRAW tool (OGDRAW) (Lohse et al., 2007).

Nucleotide Polymorphism of Fine Fescue Species

To identify genes with the most single nucleotide polymorphism, quality trimmed sequencing reads of the five fine fescues were mapped to the diploid F. ovina chloroplast genome (NCBI accession number: JX871940) using BWA v.0.7.17 (Li and Durbin, 2009). SNPs and short indels were identified using bcftools v.1.9 with the setting "mpileup -Ou" and called via bcftools using the -mv function (Quinlan and Hall, 2010). Raw SNPs were filtered using bcftools filter -s option to filter out SNPs with low quality (Phred score cutoff 20, coverage cutoff 20). The subsequent number of SNPs per gene and InDel number per gene was calculated using a custom perl script SNP_vcf_from_gene_gff.pl (https://github.com/qiuxx221/fine-fescue-).

To identify SSR markers for plant identification, MIcroSAtellite identification tool (MISA v 1.0) was used with a threshold of 10, 5, 4, 3, 3, and 3 repeat units for mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide SSRs, respectively (Thiel et al., 2003). The identification of repetitive sequences and structure of whole chloroplast genome was done via REPuter program online server (https://bibiserv.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/reputer) (Kurtz et al., 2001). Program configuration was set with minimal repeat size set as 20 bp and with sequence identify above 90%. Data was visualized using ggplot2 in R (v 3.5.3). Finally, the sliding window analysis was performed using DnaSP (v 5) with a window size of 600 bp, step size 200 bp to detected highly variable regions in the fine fescue chloroplast genome (Librado and Rozas, 2009).

Comparative Chloroplast Genomics Analysis

To compare fine fescue species chloroplast genome sequence variations, the five complete chloroplast genomes were aligned and visualized using mVISTA, an online suite of computation tools with LAGAN mode (Brudno et al., 2003; Frazer et al., 2004). The diploid F. ovina (NCBI accession number: JX871940) chloroplast genome and annotation were used as the template for the alignment.

Phylogenetic Analysis of Fine Fescues and Related Festuca Species

To construct the phylogenetic tree of the fine fescues using the whole chloroplast genome sequence, chloroplast genomes of eight species were downloaded from GenBank. Of the eight downloaded genomes, perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne, AM777385), Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum, JX871942), diploid F. ovina (JX871940), tall fescue (Festuca arundiancea, FJ466687), meadow fescue (F. pratensis, JX871941), and wood fescue (Festuca altissima, JX871939) were within the Festuca-Lolium complex. Turfgrass species outside of Festuca-Lolium complex including creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L., EF115543) and Cynodon dactylon (KY024482.1) were used as an outgroup. All chloroplast genomes were aligned using the MAFFT program (v 7) (Katoh and Standley, 2013); alignments were inspected and manually adjusted. Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses was performed using the RAxML program (v 8.2.12) under GTR+G model with 1,000 bootstrap (Stamatakis, 2006). The phylogenetic tree was visualized using FigTree (v 1.4.3) (https://github.com/rambaut/figtree) (Rambaut, 2012).

Conclusions

Five newly-sequenced complete chloroplast genomes of fine fescue taxa were reported in this study. Chloroplast genome structure and gene contents are both conserved, with the presence and absence of accD pseudogene being the biggest structural variation between the F. ovina and the F. rubra complexes. We identified SSR repeats and long sequence repeats of fine fescues and discovered several unique repeats for marker development. The phylogenetic constructions of fine fescue species in the Festuca-Lolium complex suggested a robust and consistent relationship compared to the previous identification using flow cytometry. This information provided a reference for future fine fescue taxa identification.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study can be found in the NCBI Bioproject PRJNA512126.

Author Contributions

YQ performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. CH helped analyze data, wrote perl scripts. YY helped with phylogenetic analysis. EW secured funding for this project, supervised this research, provided suggestions, and comments. All authors contributed to the revision of the manuscript and approved the final version.

Funding

This research is funded by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Specialty Crop Research Initiative under award number 2017-51181-27222.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank minnesota supercomputing institute for the high-performance computing clusters. We would also like to thank Jill Ekar, Jason Motl, and Therese Martin for providing instruction on operating the flow cytometer.

This manuscript has been released as a pre-print at bioRxiv, (Qiu et al., 2019).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2019.01223/full#supplementary-material

References

Arumuganathan, K., Tallury, S., Fraser, M., Bruneau, A., Qu, R. (1999). Nuclear DNA content of thirteen turfgrass species by flow cytometry. Crop Sci. 39, 1518–1521. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1999.3951518x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baldwin, B. G., Sanderson, M. J., Porter, J. M., Wojciechowski, M. F., Campbell, C. S., Donoghue, M. J. (1995). The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann. Mo. Bot. Garden, 82 (2), 247–277. doi: 10.2307/2399880

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Beard, J. B. (1972). Turfgrass: Science and culture.

Google Scholar

Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M., Usadel, B. (2014). Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinform. 30, 2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bonos, S. A., Huff, D. R. (2013). Cool-season grasses: Biology and breeding. Turfgrass. Biology, Use Manage 7, 591–660. doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr56.c17

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brudno, M., Do, C. B., Cooper, G. M., Kim, M. F., Davydov, E., Green, E. D., et al. (2003). LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA. Genome Res. 13, 721–731. doi: 10.1101/gr.926603

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bryan, G., Mcnicoll, J., Ramsay, G., Meyer, R., De Jong, W. (1999). Polymorphic simple sequence repeat markers in chloroplast genomes of Solanaceous plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99, 859–867. doi: 10.1007/s001220051306

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cahoon, A. B., Sharpe, R. M., Mysayphonh, C., Thompson, E. J., Ward, A. D., Lin, A. (2010). The complete chloroplast genome of tall fescue (Lolium arundinaceum; Poaceae) and comparison of whole plastomes from the family Poaceae. Am. J. Bot. 97, 49–58. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0900008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Casler, M. D. (2003). Turfgrass biology, genetics, and breeding. John Wiley & Sons.

Google Scholar

Cheng, T., Xu, C., Lei, L., Li, C., Zhang, Y., Zhou, S. (2016). Barcoding the kingdom Plantae: new PCR primers for ITS regions of plants with improved universality and specificity. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 16, 138–149. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12438

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clayton, W. D., Renvoize, S. A. (1986). Genera graminum. Grasses of the world. Genera graminum. Grasses of the World. 13.

Google Scholar

Demesure, B., Sodzi, N., Petit, R. (1995). A set of universal primers for amplification of polymorphic non-coding regions of mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA in plants. Mol. Ecol. 4, 129–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1995.tb00201.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Diekmann, K., Hodkinson, T. R., Wolfe, K. H., Van Den Bekerom, R., Dix, P. J., Barth, S. (2009). Complete chloroplast genome sequence of a major allogamous forage species, perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). DNA Res. 16, 165–176. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsp008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dierckxsens, N., Mardulyn, P., Smits, G. (2016). NOVOPlasty: de novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, e18–e18. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw955

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Doležel, J., Greilhuber, J., Suda, J. (2007). Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat. Protoc. 2, 2233. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, W., Liu, J., Yu, J., Wang, L., Zhou, S. (2012). Highly variable chloroplast markers for evaluating plant phylogeny at low taxonomic levels and for DNA barcoding. PloS One 7, e35071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ebert, D., Peakall, R. (2009). Chloroplast simple sequence repeats (cpSSRs): technical resources and recommendations for expanding cpSSR discovery and applications to a wide array of plant species. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9, 673–690. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02319.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fjellheim, S., Rognli, O. A., Fosnes, K., Brochmann, C. (2006). Phylogeographical history of the widespread meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.) inferred from chloroplast DNA sequences. J. Biogeography 33, 1470–1478. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01521.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frazer, K. A., Pachter, L., Poliakov, A., Rubin, E. M., Dubchak, I. (2004). VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W273–W279. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh458

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hand, M. L., Spangenberg, G. C., Forster, J. W., Cogan, N. O. (2013). Plastome sequence determination and comparative analysis for members of the Lolium-Festuca grass species complex. G3. Genes Genomes Genet. 3 (4), 607–616. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.005264

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hebert, P. D., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L., Dewaard, J. R. (2003). Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B.: Biol. Sci. 270, 313–321. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, Y.-Y., Cho, S.-T., Haryono, M., Kuo, C.-H. (2017). Complete chloroplast genome sequence of common bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.) and comparative analysis within the family Poaceae. PloS One 12, e0179055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hubbard, C. E. (1968). Grasses. A guide to their structure, identification, uses, and distribution in the British Isles. Grasses. A guide to their structure, identification, uses, and distribution in the British Isles.

Google Scholar

Huff, D. R., Palazzo, A. J. (1998). Fine fescue species determination by laser flow cytometry. Crop Sci. 38, 445–450. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800020029x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jenkin, T. J. (1959). Fescue Species (Festuca L.). In: Roemer, T., Rudorf, W.. Handbuch der Pflanzenzüchtung, 418-434.

Google Scholar

Katoh, K., Standley, D. M. (2013). MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kent, W. J. (2002). BLAT-the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 12, 656–664. doi: 10.1101/gr.229202

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kurtz, S., Choudhuri, J. V., Ohlebusch, E., Schleiermacher, C., Stoye, J., Giegerich, R. (2001). REPuter: the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 4633–4642. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.22.4633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Laslett, D., Canback, B. (2004). ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Durbin, R. (2009). Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinform. 25, 1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Librado, P., Rozas, J. (2009). DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinform. 25, 1451–1452. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lohse, M., Drechsel, O., Bock, R. (2007). OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW): a tool for the easy generation of high-quality custom graphical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes. Curr. Genet. 52, 267–274. doi: 10.1007/s00294-007-0161-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lowe, T. M., Eddy, S. R. (1997). tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, X., Huang, B. (2016). Gibberellin-stimulation of rhizome elongation and differential GA-responsive proteomic changes in two grass species. Front. In Plant Sci. 7, 905. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00905

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meyer, W. A., Funk, C. R. (1989). Progress and Benefits to Humanity from Breeding Cool-Season Grasses for Turf 1. Contributions from breeding forage and turf grasses, 31-48.

Google Scholar

Piper, C. V. (1906). North American species of Festuca. Department of Botany, Smithsonian Institution: US Government Printing Office. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.53679

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Provan, J., Powell, W., Hollingsworth, P. M. (2001). Chloroplast microsatellites: new tools for studies in plant ecology and evolution. Trends In Ecol. Evol. 16, 142–147. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)02097-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qiu, Y., Hirsch, C. D., Yang, Y., Watkins, E. (2019). Towards improved molecular identification tools in fine fescue (Festuca L., poaceae) turfgrasses: nuclear genome size, ploidy, and chloroplast genome sequencing. bioRxiv, 708149. doi: 10.1101/708149.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quinlan, A. R., Hall, I. M. (2010). BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinform. 26, 841–842. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rambaut, A. (2012). FigTree v1. 4.

Google Scholar

Robbins, M. D., Staub, J. E., Bushman, B. S. (2016). Development of fine-leaved Festuca grass populations identifies genetic resources having improved forage production with potential for wildfire control in the western United States. Euphytica 209, 377–393. doi: 10.1007/s10681-016-1644-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rousseau-Gueutin, M., Huang, X., Higginson, E., Ayliffe, M., Day, A., Timmis, J. N. (2013). Potential functional replacement of the plastidic acetyl-CoA carboxylase subunit (accD) gene by recent transfers to the nucleus in some angiosperm lineages. Plant Physiol. 161, 1918–1929. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.214528

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ruemmele, B., Brilman, L., Huff, D. (1995). Fine fescue germplasm diversity and vulnerability. Crop Sci. 35, 313–316. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500020003x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stamatakis, A. (2006). RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinform. 22, 2688–2690. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thiel, T., Michalek, W., Varshney, R., Graner, A. (2003). Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 106, 411–422. doi: 10.1007/s00122-002-1031-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tillich, M., Lehwark, P., Pellizzer, T., Ulbricht-Jones, E. S., Fischer, A., Bock, R., et al. (2017). GeSeq-versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, W6–W11. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx391

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Torrecilla, P., Catalán, P. (2002). Phylogeny of broad-leaved and fine-leaved Festuca lineages (Poaceae) based on nuclear ITS sequences. Syst. Bot. 27, 241–252. doi: 10.1043/0363-6445-27.2.241

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Untergasser, A., Cutcutache, I., Koressaar, T., Ye, J., Faircloth, B. C., Remm, M., et al. (2012). Primer3-new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e115–e115. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks596

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wyman, S. K., Jansen, R. K., Boore, J. L. (2004). Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinform. 20, 3252–3255. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth352

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, M., Zhu, L., Pan, C., Xu, L., Liu, Y., Ke, W., et al. (2015). Transcriptomic analysis of the regulation of rhizome formation in temperate and tropical lotus (Nelumbo nucifera). Sci. Rep. 5, 13059. doi: 10.1038/srep13059

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: fine fescue, chloroplast genome, phylogeny, comparative genomics, low input turfgrass

Citation: Qiu Y, Hirsch CD, Yang Y and Watkins E (2019) Towards Improved Molecular Identification Tools in Fine Fescue (Festuca L., Poaceae) Turfgrasses: Nuclear Genome Size, Ploidy, and Chloroplast Genome Sequencing. Front. Genet. 10:1223. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01223

Received: 15 August 2019; Accepted: 05 November 2019;
Published: 06 December 2019.

Edited by:

Wenqin Wang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China

Reviewed by:

Yingjuan Su, Sun Yat-sen University, China
David J. Winter, Massey University, New Zealand

Copyright © 2019 Qiu, Hirsch, Yang and Watkins. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yinjie Qiu, qiuxx221@umn.edu