Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Genet., 12 December 2022
Sec. Immunogenetics

CLEC16A variants conferred a decreased risk to allergic rhinitis in the Chinese population

Yongliang Niu&#x;Yongliang Niu1Haiying Wang&#x;Haiying Wang2Zhengqing LiZhengqing Li3Bilal Haider ShamsiBilal Haider Shamsi2Mingxia LiuMingxia Liu4Juan LiuJuan Liu4Qiang WangQiang Wang5Yonglin Liu
Yonglin Liu2*
  • 1Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shenmu Hospital, The Affiliated Shenmu Hospital of Northwest University, Shenmu, China
  • 2Department of Science and Education, Shenmu Hospital, The Affiliated Shenmu Hospital of Northwest University, Shenmu, China
  • 3Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shenmu Hospital, The Affiliated Shenmu Hospital of Northwest University, Shenmu, China
  • 4Department of Prevention and Protection, Shenmu Hospital, The Affiliated Shenmu Hospital of Northwest University, Shenmu, China
  • 5President Office, Shenmu Hospital, The Affiliated Shenmu Hospital of Northwest University, Shenmu, China

Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic respiratory disease. Hereditary factors played a key role in the pathogenesis of the AR. This study investigated the association between CLEC16A variants and AR risk in the Chinese population.

Methods: We applied Agena MassARRAY technology platform to genotype five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in CLEC16A in 1004 controls and 995 cases. The association between CLEC16A SNPs (rs2286973, rs887864, rs12935657, rs11645657 and rs36045143) and AR risk were calculated by logistic regression analysis, with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). False-positive report probability (FPRP) was also used to assess the significant results to reduce false positives. Multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) was completed to assess the interaction between CLEC16A variants to predict AR risk.

Results: Totally, CLEC16A (rs887864, rs12935657, rs2286973, rs11645657 and rs36045143) were significantly associated with AR risk. Therein, rs2286973, rs11645657 and rs36045143 were related to a decreased risk of AR in the people ≤ 43 years old, females and the people with BMI≤24, respectively. And rs887864 and rs12935657 were also associated with a decreased susceptibility of AR in the people >43 years old. Meanwhile, in the results of region stratification, rs887864 conferred a reduced risk to AR in the people from loess hilly area.

Conclusion: CLEC16A variants conferred a decreased risk to AR in the Chinese population.

Introduction

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic respiratory disease characterized by allergen sensitization mainly mediated by immunoglobulin E (IgE). It is characterized by runny nose, sneezing, stuffy nose, pruritus and other triggers. Several factors have been implicated in the etiology of AR, including pollen, dust mites, mold, animal dander and other factors (Skoner, 2001). The disease has a major impact on patients’ quality of life and healthcare spending (Canonica et al., 2008). Globally, AR affects approximately 10%–30% of the population. And due to genetic susceptibility, and environmental exposure, it was steadily increasing in the world (Passali et al., 2018). Although the etiology of AR has not been elucidated, there was sufficient evidence that cytokines played an important role in the development and process of AR (Sio et al., 2022).

CLEC16A (C-Type Lectin Domain Family 16 Member A) was formerly known as KIAA0350. It is located in the chromosome 16p13.13. This gene encodes a family member containing a C-type lectin domain. The protein CLEC16A was shown to be a cytosolic protein that binds to Vps16A and regulates the receptor expression through autophagy. In a CLEC16A knockout mice through Cre/loxP system, they found up-regulation of cytokine and chemokine secretion, imbalance of dendritic cell subsets and change of receptor expression in mice (Pandey et al., 2019). Some researchers also found that the deletion of CLEC16A leaded to the increase of Nrdp1 targeting parkin (Soleimanpour et al., 2014), and Golgi-related CLEC16A negatively regulated autophagy by regulating mTOR pathway (Tam et al., 2017). At present, CLEC16A was recognized as a susceptibility gene for autoimmune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis (Mero et al., 2011), juvenile idiopathic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis (Skinningsrud et al., 2010). This suggested that CLEC16A may be the main regulator of abnormal autoimmune response.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were reported to be an important genetic factor in abnormal autoimmune response. In one previous study, Hakonarson et al. identified CLEC16A as a protective gene for type 1 diabetes gene (Hakonarson et al., 2007). Also, Hirschfield et al. observed the association between primary biliary cirrhosis and variants of immune regulatory gene CLEC16A (Hirschfield et al., 2012). Besides, CLEC16A polymorphisms may involve in pathogenesis of allergic diseases (Revez et al., 2016; Ashley et al., 2017), which can increase or decrease susceptibility to AR through interleukin, and other genes (Black et al., 2009). In an article reported by Ferreira et al., they observed CLEC16A rs62026376 associated with increased asthma with hay fever risk (Ferreira et al., 2014). So, it may be a risky variant. However, CLEC16A variants have been rarely reported in AR population from China.

In the present study, we selected five variants of CLEC16A (rs2286973, rs887864, rs12935657, rs11645657 and rs36045143) based on the 1000 genome project. Based on the NCBI website, we found that rs887864, rs12935657, rs11645657 and rs36045143 were located in the intron region of CLEC16A, while rs2286973 was located in the last exon region of CLEC16A. When rs2286973 G mutates into rs2286973 A, the encoded amino acid has not changed. Subsequently, we assessed the relationship between CLEC16A variants (rs2286973, rs887864, rs12935657, rs11645657 and rs36045143) with AR risk in the Han population from Shaanxi, China.

Materials and methods

Study population

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shenmu Hospital and the authorization number was sm004. In this study, all the involved subjects were the Chinese Han population. Totally, 1004 controls (346 males and 658 females) and 995 patients with AR (371 males and 624 females) were consecutively recruited from 5 towns (Daliuta Town in plain lands area, Jinjie Town, Langanbao Town, Hejiachuan Town and central urban area in hilly areas) in Shenmu city. The selected criteria for patients with AR were as follows. ①Clinical symptoms: the patient has two or more symptoms such as sneezing, runny nose, itchy nose, blocked nose and so on. ②Nasal symptoms: pale and swollen bilateral nasal mucosa, inferior turbinate edema, and watery nasal discharge. ③Allergen testing: Blood was drawn to examine specific IgE, and the diagnosis of AR was confirmed if the patient had high specific IgE in serum. The exclusion criteria for AR patients were: no history of asthma, no comprehensive disease such as lung cancer, and no infectious disease such as tuberculosis. Also, based on the routine physical examination, the controls had no history of respiratory diseases, including sinusitis, rhinitis and other inflammatory disease. By reviewing the participant’s hospital records, we collected the information of participants, such as age, sex, height, weight, place of origin, residence, occupation, past medical history, family medical history, etc. In addition, we also collected the blood routine indicators obtained by the blood analyzer, such as red blood cell distribution width_SD (RDW_SD), basophil count (BASO), eosinophil count (EO), hemoglobin (HGB), mean hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), neutrophil ratio (NEUT_per), lymphocyte ratio (LYMPH_per), eosinophil ratio (EO_per), basophil ratio (BASO_per) and red blood cell distribution width_CV (RDW_CV). Biochemical indicators (fasting blood glucose, FBG) and renal function indicators (uric acid, UA) were measured by drawing venous blood. Written informed consent was collected from all subjects. All procedures comply with the regulations of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) on the protection of human research objects.

Genotyping of SNPs

According to the SNPs data downloaded from the 1000 genome project (http://www.internationalgenome.org/), CLEC16A variants (rs2286973, rs887864, rs12935657, rs11645657 and rs36045143) with minor allele frequencies> 5% and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) > 0.01 were chosen in the global population. According to the specificity principle of primers, these sites meet the requirements. The SNP-related primers (amplification and extension primers) were finished and listed in Supplementary Table S1. 3ml peripheral blood samples were collected from participants in EDTA pretreated tubes. Subsequently, genomic DNA extracted by the GoldMag Whole Blood Genomic DNA Purification Kit (GoldMag Co. Ltd., Xi’an, China), which was used as the PCR amplification template. Subsequently, DNA concentration was estimated by NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States). Then, using the Agena MassARRAY platform with iPLEX gold chemistry (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA, United States), genotyping of CLEC16A variants were proceeded in a 384-well plate. And data management was performed by Agena Bioscience TYPER software, Version 4.0 (Ding et al., 2015).

Statistical analysis

IBM SPSS statistical software version 24 and Microsoft Excel were used to analyze the socio demographic descriptive data of the case group and the control group. The continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard error (SE) and compared by Student’s t-test. Age and sex distribution differences of AR patients and controls were assessed by t-test and chi-square test, respectively. Meanwhile, in the controls, we analyzed whether the selected SNP sites met the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium by chi-square test. Chi-square test was also used to analyze the genotype and allele distribution of AR patients and controls. The relationship between CLEC16A variants and AR risk was assessed by logistic regression analysis calculated by the PLINK software, version 1.07 (Harvard, Boston, MA, United States). Generally, OR and 95% CI were calculated by logistic regression to analyze the association under four genetic models (codominant, dominant, recessive and log-additive models). To further eliminate false positive in the data, we used FPRP to analyze the significant results. Multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) was completed to assess the interaction between CLEC16A variants to predict AR risk. P less than 0.05 was considered as significative.

Results

The basic information of study population and the selected variants

Noteworthy, 1004 controls and 995 patients with AR were collected in this study. The mean age of the 1004 controls (346 males and 658 females) and 995 patients (371 males and 624 females) were 43.77 ± 0.26 years old and 42.81 ± 0.33 years old, respectively (Table 1). There was a difference in age between the two groups (p = 0.002), but there was no difference in sex and BMI between the two groups (p = 0.188, p = 0.796, respectively). In addition, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the distribution of wind beach area and loess hilly area (p = 0.738). Supplementary Table S2 listed the clinical parameters of cases and controls.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Basic information of patients with AR and controls.

In Table 2, the basic information of CLEC16A variants (rs2286973, rs887864, rs12935657, rs11645657 and rs36045143) were listed, including SNP-ID, gene, chromosome, position, localization, allele, minor allele frequency, major allele frequency and HWE p-value. The genotype distribution of all loci in the control group met Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. We listed the function of the selected SNPs predicated by Regulome DB scores and HaploReg. And the primers of CLEC16A variants were shown in Supplementary Table S1.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 2. Basic information of CLEC16A variants.

Also, we conducted clinical parameter analysis of different genotype carriers (Supplementary Table S3). The results showed that the EO content of the patients with the three genotypes (A/A, G/A, G/G) was significantly different (p = 0.023). As for rs11645657, controls with the three genotypes (A/A, G/A, G/G) had different clinical parameters-HGB and UA (p = 0.007, p = 0.028), whereas, cases with A/A, G/A, G/G genotype had significantly different LYMPH_per (p = 0.035).

The correlation between CLEC16A variants and AR risk was analyzed in the overall population

In order to analyze the above differences, we used logistic regression to evaluate the association of CLEC16A variants (rs2286973, rs887864, rs12935657, rs11645657 and rs36045143) with AR risk (Table 3). The results of the allele model showed that rs887864-A conferred a remarkable decreased risk to AR (adjusted OR: 0.86, 95%CI: 0.74–0.99, p = 0.040), while rs12935657-G had no significant association with AR risk (adjusted OR: 0.87, 95%CI: 0.71–1.07, p = 0.197). In the results of genetic models (codominant, dominant, recessive and log-additive) analysis, rs887864 was significantly associated with AR risk (codominant-A/A genotype: adjusted OR: 0.60, 95%CI: 0.40–0.91, p = 0.016; recessive-G/G-G/A genotype: adjusted OR: 0.62, 95%CI: 0.41–0.93, p = 0.021; adjusted OR: 0.86, 95%CI: 0.74–0.99, log-additive: p = 0.043). The above results illustrated that allele-A and genotype-AA may play a protective role in the pathogenesis of AR. And, a significant correlation between rs12935657 and AR susceptivity was observed in the codominant (G/G genotype: OR: 0.24, 95%CI: 0.07–0.83, p = 0.025) and recessive (G/G genotype: OR: 0.24, 95%CI: 0.07–0.84, p = 0.025) models, suggesting that genotype-GG may play a protective role in the pathogenesis of AR. We also did the FPRP analysis for the significant associations of CLEC16A variants with AR risk (Supplementary Table S4). When the statistical power assumed to be 1.00, the noteworthy association between rs887864 and AR risk in the allele, codominant, recessive and log-additive models (FPRP = 0.097, 0.136 and 0.147, respectively), with noteworthiness for OR of 1.50/0.67 and the FPRP cut-off value 0.2.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 3. Association between CLEC16A variants and AR risk in the total population.

Effect of CLEC16A variants on AR risk stratified by age, sex and BMI

We further analyzed the relationship between CLEC16A loci and the risk of AR stratified by age, sex and BMI (Table 4 and Table 5). In Table 4, the results of age stratification showed that rs2286973, rs11645657 and rs36045143 were related to a decreased risk of AR in the people ≤43 years old (rs2286973: codominant-G/A genotype: p = 0.013; dominant-G/A-G/G genotype: p = 0.013; log-additive: p = 0.040; rs11645657: allele-C: p = 0.033; dominant-G/C-C/C genotype: p = 0.031; log-additive: p = 0.025; rs36045143: allele-A: p = 0.000; codominant-G/A genotype: p = 0.000; dominant-G/A-A/A genotype: p = 0.000; log-additive: p = 0.000). Rs887864 and rs12935657 were also associated with a decreased susceptibility of AR in the people >43 years old (rs887864: codominant-A/A genotype: p = 0.004; recessive-A/A genotype: p = 0.002; rs12935657: codominant-G/G genotype: p = 0.045; recessive-G/G genotype: p = 0.039) and the people ≤43 years old (rs887864: allele-A: p = 0.015; codominant-A/G genotype: p = 0.003; dominant-G/A-A/A genotype: p = 0.002; log-additive: p = 0.004; rs12935657: allele-G: p = 0.001; codominant-G/A genotype: p = 0.002; dominant-G/G genotype: p = 0.001; log-additive: p = 0.001) adjusted by age, sex and BMI.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 4. Association between CLEC16A variants and AR risk stratified by age.

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 5. Association between CLEC16A variants and AR risk stratified by sex and BMI.

In Table 5, the sex stratification displayed that rs2286973, rs887864 and rs11645657 were related to AR risk in females (rs2286973: codominant-G/G genotype: p = 0.027; recessive-G/G genotype: p = 0.040; log-additive: p = 0.041; rs887864: allele-A: p = 0.023; codominant-A/A genotype: p = 0.044; dominant-G/A-A/A genotype: p = 0.040; log-additive: p = 0.018; rs11645657: allele-C: p = 0.038; codominant-C/C genotype: p = 0.044; log-additive: p = 0.025), but these loci had no significant association with AR risk in males. The BMI stratification demonstrated that rs2286973, rs11645657 and rs36045143 were correlated with AR risk in the people with BMI≤24 (rs2286973: allele-G: p = 0.012; codominant-G/G genotype: p = 0.029; dominant-G/A-G/G genotype: p = 0.023; log-additive: p = 0.013; rs887864: allele-A: p = 0.014; codominant-A/A genotype: p = 0.037; dominant-G/A-A/A genotype: p = 0.035; log-additive: p = 0.015; rs36045143: allele-A: p = 0.018; log-additive: p = 0.020). Whereas, these SNPs were not found to be associated with AR risk in the people with BMI>24.

Effect of CLEC16A variants on AR risk stratified by region

Meanwhile, we evaluated the association between CLEC16A variants and AR risk stratified by region (wind beach area and loess hilly area) in Table 6. In the people from loess hilly area, rs887864 conferred a reduced risk to AR in the codominant (A/A genotype: p = 0.015) and recessive (A/A genotype: p = 0.016) models. Yet, the site was not found to be associated with the risk of AR in the people from wind beach area.

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 6. Association between CLEC16A variants and AR risk stratified by region.

SNP-SNP interaction was used to predict AR risk

To predict the AR risk, we did the SNP-SNP interaction among CLEC16A variants by MDR method (Supplementary Table S5, Figure 1 and Figure 2). In the Supplementary Table S5, the best model was composed of rs2286973 G/A, rs887864 G/A, rs12935657 G/A, rs11645657 C/G and rs36045143 A/G, with cross-validation consistency (CVC) of 10/10 and testing balanced accuracy of 55% (adjusted OR: 2.05, 95%CI: 1.67–2.51, p < 0.000). In the Supplementary Table S6, we have listed all possible genotype combinations. Among them, the high-risk genotypes (ratio greater than 1) were AG*GA*GG*CC*AA, AG*GA*GG*GC*AA, AG*GA*GA*GC*AG, AA*GA*GA*GG*AG, AA*GA*GA*GC*AG,AA*GG*GG*CC*AA, GG*AA*GG*CC*AA and GG*AA*GG*GC*AA. In addition, we showed the interaction between each site with the dendrogram (Figure 1) and the circle graph (Figure 2). Antagonism was indicated by blue, green and brown. In Figure 2, the interaction between rs2286973 and rs887864 was the strongest, with the information gain (IG) value 0.00%.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. The interaction between rs2286973, rs887864, rs12935657, rs11645657 and rs36045143 were shown in the dendrogram. Antagonism was indicated by blue, and green.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. The circle graph showed that the interaction between rs2286973 and rs887864 was the strongest, with the information gain (IG) value 0.00%. Antagonism was indicated by blue, green and brown.

Discussion

CLEC16A is found in the 16p13 area next to CIITA gene. It was reported that CLEC16A lacks a functional Ag recognition domain, and Schuster et al. observed that it can induce autoimmune responses in mice, possibly by stimulating Ag expression in thymic epithelial cells (Schuster et al., 2015). More importantly, CLEC16A may be the main regulator of autoimmunity, like Type 1 diabetes (Barrett et al., 2009), primary biliary cirrhosis (Hirschfield et al., 2012), alopecia areata (Jagielska et al., 2012). Also, CLEC16A variations were observed to affect the selection and reactivity of T cells (Schuster et al., 2015). The study provided a link between CLEC16A variants and immune disorders underlying autoimmune risk. Based on the genome wide association analysis, Ferreira et al. identified the risk variations associated with hay fever phenotype asthma, including the sites of CLEC16A (Ferreira et al., 2014). Among them, rs62026376 C allele was observed to be associated with an increased risk of hay fever asthma. In addition, Gao et al. noticed that CLEC16A rs7203459 was a specific susceptibility locus of AR in the Han Chinese population (Gao et al., 2020). In our research, we also observed the significant association between CLEC16A SNPs (rs2286973, rs887864, rs12935657, rs11645657 and rs36045143) and AR risk. It showed the importance of CLEC16A polymorphisms in AR. The analysis of the interaction between rs2286973, rs887864, rs12935657, rs11645657 and rs36045143 is helpful to discover the risk factors of AR. Our results showed that the best model was composed of rs2286973 G/A, rs887864 G/A, rs12935657 G/A, rs11645657 C/G and rs36045143 A/G for AR.

The incidence of AR increased with age (Westman et al., 2012). It has been reported that there is a certain prevalence of AR in childhood (Wise et al., 2018). Once allergic symptoms appear, the symptoms generally persist into adulthood. As much as 80% of AR patients develop symptoms before the age of 20 years (Roditi and Shin, 2018). Not only that, some researchers observed that the influence of some susceptible genes on AR was related to age (Zhang and Xu, 2020; Yin et al., 2021). In this study, we took the average age of 43 as the critical value for stratified analysis. The results showed rs2286973, rs11645657 and rs36045143 were related to a decreased risk of AR in the people ≤43 years old, while no such association was found in people over 43 years of age. These findings suggest that rs2286973, rs11645657 and rs36045143 polymorphisms have age-related effect on AR risk.

AR was a sex-specific disease (Osman et al., 2007). In one article reported by Rosário et al., boys often appeared allergic reactions in childhood, while girls were more likely to develop allergic disorders (including AR) during sexual development (Rosário et al., 2021). This may be related to sex hormones, lifestyle, dietary differences, professional choice and treatment compliance and other factors (Stübner et al., 1999). What’s more, genetic susceptibility to AR varied by sex (Tian et al., 2015). In the present study, rs2286973, rs887864 and rs11645657 were related to AR risk in females, but these loci had no significant association with AR risk in males. The findings reemphasized the importance of sex in the study of the association between genetics and AR risk.

BMI was an influential factor for the high prevalence of AR (Lokaj-Berisha et al., 2015). Not only that, some reporters found that variants of genes were associated with the susceptibility to AR. Wang et al. found that LPP (rs2030519, rs6780858 and rs2990220) were related to AR risk (Wang et al., 2022). Lian et al. observed that Related Orphan Receptor A (RORA)-rs10519067, rs10519068, and rs11071559-were associated with AR patients with BMI ≤24 kg/m2 (Lian et al., 2022). In the study, rs2286973, rs11645657 and rs36045143 were correlated with AR risk in the people with BMI≤24, illustrated that AR risk was influenced by BMI.

Regionality was also a factor affecting AR. In our previous research (Gao et al., 2021), the prevalence of asthma without AR was 1.55 times higher in people living in plain areas than that in people living in hilly areas. Moreover, we found that the prevalence of AR with asthma was 2.00 times higher in plains than that in hills. These results indicated that the incidence of asthma and AR was closely related to the place of residence of the patients. In order to further study the impact of the region on AR, we assessed the association between CLEC16A variants and AR risk stratified by region (wind beach area and loess hilly area). In the people from loess hilly area, rs887864 conferred a reduced risk to AR. Yet, the site was not found to be associated with the risk of AR in the people from wind beach area. A large number of samples were required for subsequent verification.

There are still some deficiencies in this study. Firstly, the study population focused on the Han population, and different ethnic populations should be collected to verify the results. Secondly, the other risk factors (occupational exposures, working condition, family background, physical activity, etc.) were not included and should be considered for future assessment. Thirdly, we used Regulome DB (http://www.regulomedb.org/) and HaploReg predict the function of SNPs (Table 2). Further theoretical experiments were needed to verify that these sites may affect the risk of AR.

Conclusion

In a short, CLEC16A (rs887864, rs12935657, rs2286973, rs11645657 and rs36045143) conferred a decreased risk to AR in the Chinese population.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found here: https://zenodo.org/7284973.

Author contributions

YN and HW completed genotyping and performed the manuscript. ZL and ML took part in genotyping. BS, JL and QW participated in the statistical analysis of the data and modified the manuscript. YL designed the study, co-supervised the project and finalized the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2021SF-075), Science and Technology Plan Project of Yulin City (YF-2020–191) and Shenmu Municipal Government Scientific Research Project (2019) No.5.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the participants and volunteers involved in this project.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.1053761/full#supplementary-material

References

Ashley, S. E., Tan, H. T., Vuillermin, P., Dharmage, S. C., Tang, M. L. K., Koplin, J., et al. (2017). The skin barrier function gene SPINK5 is associated with challenge-proven IgE-mediated food allergy in infants. Allergy 72, 1356–1364. doi:10.1111/all.13143

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barrett, J. C., Clayton, D. G., Concannon, P., Akolkar, B., Cooper, J. D., Erlich, H. A., et al. (2009). Genome-wide association study and meta-analysis find that over 40 loci affect risk of type 1 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 41, 703–707. doi:10.1038/ng.381

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Black, S., Teixeira, A. S., Loh, A. X., Vinall, L., Holloway, J. W., Hardy, R., et al. (2009). Contribution of functional variation in the IL13 gene to allergy, hay fever and asthma in the NSHD longitudinal 1946 birth cohort. Allergy 64, 1172–1178. doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.01988.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Canonica, G. W., Mullol, J., Pradalier, A., and Didier, A. (2008). Patient perceptions of allergic rhinitis and quality of life: Findings from a survey conducted in Europe and the United States. World Allergy Organ. J. 1, 138–144. doi:10.1097/WOX.0b013e3181865faf

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ding, Y., Yang, D., Zhou, L., Xu, J., Chen, Y., He, P., et al. (2015). Variants in multiple genes polymorphism association analysis of COPD in the Chinese Li population. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 10, 1455–1463. doi:10.2147/COPD.S86721

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ferreira, M. A., Matheson, M. C., Tang, C. S., Granell, R., Ang, W., Hui, J., et al. (2014). Genome-wide association analysis identifies 11 risk variants associated with the asthma with hay fever phenotype. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 133, 1564–1571. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.10.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, H., Niu, Y., Wang, Q., Shan, G., Ma, C., Wang, H., et al. (2021). Analysis of prevalence and risk factors of adult self-reported allergic rhinitis and asthma in plain lands and hilly areas of Shenmu city, China. Front. Public Health 9, 749388. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.749388

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, Y., Li, J., Zhang, Y., and Zhang, L. (2020). Replication study of susceptibility variants associated with allergic rhinitis and allergy in Han Chinese. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 16, 13. doi:10.1186/s13223-020-0411-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hakonarson, H., Grant, S. F., Bradfield, J. P., Marchand, L., Kim, C. E., Glessner, J. T., et al. (2007). A genome-wide association study identifies KIAA0350 as a type 1 diabetes gene. Nature 448, 591–594. doi:10.1038/nature06010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hirschfield, G. M., Xie, G., Lu, E., Sun, Y., Juran, B. D., Chellappa, V., et al. (2012). Association of primary biliary cirrhosis with variants in the CLEC16A, SOCS1, SPIB and SIAE immunomodulatory genes. Genes Immun. 13, 328–335. doi:10.1038/gene.2011.89

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jagielska, D., Redler, S., Brockschmidt, F. F., Herold, C., Pasternack, S. M., Garcia Bartels, N., et al. (2012). Follow-up study of the first genome-wide association scan in alopecia areata: IL13 and KIAA0350 as susceptibility loci supported with genome-wide significance. J. Invest. Dermatol. 132, 2192–2197. doi:10.1038/jid.2012.129

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lian, P., Du, X., Liu, X., Ruan, W., Liu, Y., and Wang, H. (2022). RORA polymorphisms are risk factors for allergic rhinitis susceptibility in the Shaanxi Han population. Int. Immunopharmacol. 108, 108874. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108874

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lokaj-Berisha, V., Gacaferri-Lumezi, B., Berisha, N., and Gashi-Hoxha, S. (2015). A pilot study on BMI, serum testosterone and estradiol levels in allergic male patients. Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 3, 595–600. doi:10.3889/oamjms.2015.101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mero, I. L., Ban, M., Lorentzen Å, R., Smestad, C., Celius, E. G., Sæther, H., et al. (2011). Exploring the CLEC16A gene reveals a MS-associated variant with correlation to the relative expression of CLEC16A isoforms in thymus. Genes Immun. 12, 191–198. doi:10.1038/gene.2010.59

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Osman, M., Hansell, A. L., Simpson, C. R., Hollowell, J., and Helms, P. J. (2007). Gender-specific presentations for asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema in primary care. Prim. Care Respir. J. 16, 28–35. doi:10.3132/pcrj.2007.00006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pandey, R., Bakay, M., Hain, H. S., Strenkowski, B., Yermakova, A., Kushner, J. A., et al. (2019). The autoimmune disorder susceptibility gene CLEC16A restrains NK cell function in YTS NK cell line and Clec16a knockout mice. Front. Immunol. 10, 68. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Passali, D., Cingi, C., Staffa, P., Passali, F., Muluk, N. B., and Bellussi, M. L. (2018). The international study of the allergic rhinitis survey: Outcomes from 4 geographical regions. Asia Pac. Allergy 8, e7. doi:10.5415/apallergy.2018.8.e7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Revez, J. A., Matheson, M. C., Hui, J., Baltic, S., James, A., Upham, J. W., et al. (2016). Identification of STOML2 as a putative novel asthma risk gene associated with IL6R. Allergy 71, 1020–1030. doi:10.1111/all.12869

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roditi, R. E., and Shin, J. J. (2018). The influence of age on the relationship between allergic rhinitis and otitis media. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 18, 68. doi:10.1007/s11882-018-0826-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosário, C. S., Cardozo, C. A., Neto, H. J. C., and Filho, N. a. R. (2021). Do gender and puberty influence allergic diseases? Allergol. Immunopathol. 49, 122–125. doi:10.15586/aei.v49i2.49

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schuster, C., Gerold, K. D., Schober, K., Probst, L., Boerner, K., Kim, M. J., et al. (2015). The autoimmunity-associated gene CLEC16A modulates thymic epithelial cell autophagy and alters T cell selection. Immunity 42, 942–952. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sio, Y. Y., Shi, P., Say, Y. H., and Chew, F. T. (2022). Functional variants in the chromosome 4q21 locus contribute to allergic rhinitis risk by modulating the expression of N-acylethanolamine acid amidase. Clin. Exp. Allergy 52, 127–136. doi:10.1111/cea.13883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Skinningsrud, B., Lie, B. A., Husebye, E. S., Kvien, T. K., Førre, Ø., Flatø, B., et al. (2010). A CLEC16A variant confers risk for juvenile idiopathic arthritis and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody negative rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 69, 1471–1474. doi:10.1136/ard.2009.114934

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Skoner, D. P. (2001). Allergic rhinitis: Definition, epidemiology, pathophysiology, detection, and diagnosis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 108, S2–S8. doi:10.1067/mai.2001.115569

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Soleimanpour, S. A., Gupta, A., Bakay, M., Ferrari, A. M., Groff, D. N., Fadista, J., et al. (2014). The diabetes susceptibility gene Clec16a regulates mitophagy. Cell 157, 1577–1590. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stübner, U. P., Gruber, D., Berger, U. E., Toth, J., Marks, B., Huber, J., et al. (1999). The influence of female sex hormones on nasal reactivity in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Allergy 54, 865–871. doi:10.1034/j.1398-9995.1999.00961.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tam, R. C., Li, M. W., Gao, Y. P., Pang, Y. T., Yan, S., Ge, W., et al. (2017). Human CLEC16A regulates autophagy through modulating mTOR activity. Exp. Cell Res. 352, 304–312. doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.02.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tian, H. Q., Chen, X. Y., Lu, Y., Lu, W. M., Wang, M. L., Zhao, H. L., et al. (2015). Association of VDR and CYP2R1 polymorphisms with mite-sensitized persistent allergic rhinitis in a Chinese population. PLoS One 10, e0133162. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133162

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H., Han, H., Niu, Y., Li, X., Du, X., and Wang, Q. (2022). LPP polymorphisms are risk factors for allergic rhinitis in the Chinese Han population. Cytokine 159, 156027. doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2022.156027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Westman, M., Stjärne, P., Asarnoj, A., Kull, I., Van Hage, M., Wickman, M., et al. (2012). Natural course and comorbidities of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis in children. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 129, 403–408. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2011.09.036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wise, S. K., Lin, S. Y., Toskala, E., Orlandi, R. R., Akdis, C. A., Alt, J. A., et al. (2018). International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Allergic rhinitis. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 8, 108–352. doi:10.1002/alr.22073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yin, X., Wang, B., Yan, Z., Hu, L., and Zhang, X. (2021). Association between SP-A rs1965708 gene polymorphism and allergic rhinitis risk in Chinese population. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 35, e23828. doi:10.1002/jcla.23828

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, W., and Xu, Y. (2020). Association between vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism rs2228570 and allergic rhinitis. Pharmgenomics. Pers. Med. 13, 327–335. doi:10.2147/PGPM.S262402

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: allergic rhinitis, CLEC16A, variants, association analysis, Chinese population

Citation: Niu Y, Wang H, Li Z, Shamsi BH, Liu M, Liu J, Wang Q and Liu Y (2022) CLEC16A variants conferred a decreased risk to allergic rhinitis in the Chinese population. Front. Genet. 13:1053761. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1053761

Received: 26 September 2022; Accepted: 23 November 2022;
Published: 12 December 2022.

Edited by:

Rebeca Pérez Morales, Juárez University of the State of Durango, Mexico

Reviewed by:

Efraín Ríos Sánchez, Secretaria de Salud, Mexico
Wendy García-Suastegui, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla., Mexico

Copyright © 2022 Niu, Wang, Li, Shamsi, Liu, Liu, Wang and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yonglin Liu, lylsmsyy@126.com

These authors share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.