In the original article, there was a mistake in the legend for Table 4 as published. There was a typo in the legend: “Standardised coefficients represent estimated changes in cognitive function. Domain estimates (executive function, language, memory, visuospatial cognition) change in standard deviation units. Adjusted R-squared values per model with residual standard error (SE) is shown. *p < 0.5, **p < 0.00001, ***p < 2e-16.” The correct legend is “Standardised coefficients represent estimated changes in cognitive function. Domain estimates (executive function, language, memory, visuospatial cognition) change in standard deviation units. Adjusted R-squared values per model with residual standard error (SE) is shown. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.00001, ***p < 2e-16.”
In the original article, there was a mistake in the legend for Supplementary Table S1 as published. There was a typo in the legend: “Standardised coefficients represent estimated changes in cognitive function. Domain estimates (executive function, language, memory, visuospatial cognition) change in standard deviation units. Adjusted R-squared values per model with residual standard error (SE) is shown. *p < 0.5, **p < 0.00001, ***p < 2e-16.” The correct legend is “Standardised coefficients represent estimated changes in cognitive function. Domain estimates (executive function, language, memory, visuospatial cognition) change in standard deviation units. Adjusted R-squared values per model with residual standard error (SE) is shown. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.00001, ***p < 2e-16.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
apolipoprotein E ε4, cognitive function, african population, educational attainment, memory, executive function, visuospatial ability, language
Citation
Soo CC, Farrell MT, Tollman S, Berkman L, Nebel A and Ramsay M (2022) Corrigendum: Apolipoprotein E Genetic Variation and its Association With Cognitive Function in Rural-Dwelling Older South Africans. Front. Genet. 13:795349. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.795349
Received
14 October 2021
Accepted
17 March 2022
Published
20 April 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited and reviewed by
Helge Frieling, Hannover Medical School, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Soo, Farrell, Tollman, Berkman, Nebel and Ramsay.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Cassandra C. Soo, soo.cassandra.c@gmail.com
This article was submitted to Behavioral and Psychiatric Genetics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.