Maria C. Katapodi1,2*
Carla Pedrazzani1,3
Sivia Barnoy1,4
Efrat Dagan1,5
Muriel Fluri1,6
Tarsha Jones1,7
Sue Kim1,8Meghan L. Underhill-Blazey1,9Melissa K. Uveges1,10Andrew A. Dwyer1,10,11*- 1International Nursing CASCADE Consortium, Basel, Switzerland
- 2Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- 3Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Manno, Switzerland
- 4Nursing Department, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- 5The Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
- 6Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
- 7Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States
- 8College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 9School of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States
- 10William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Boston, MA, United States
- 11Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Center for Reproductive Medicine, Boston, MA, United States
Introduction: Efforts are needed across disciplines to close disparities in genomic healthcare. Nurses are the most numerous trained healthcare professionals worldwide and can play a key role in addressing disparities across the continuum of care. ACCESS is an empirically-based theoretical framework to guide clinical practice in order to ameliorate genomic disparities.
Methods: The framework was developed by the International Nursing CASCADE Consortium based on evidence collected between 2005 and 2023 from individuals and families of various ethnic backgrounds, with diverse hereditary conditions, and in different healthcare systems, i.e., Israel, Korea, Switzerland, and several U.S. States. The components of the framework were validated against published scientific literature.
Results: ACCESS stands for Advocating, Coping, Communication, cascadE Screening, and Surveillance. Each component is demonstrated in concrete examples of clinical practice within the scope of the nursing profession related to genomic healthcare. Key outcomes include advocacy, active coping, intrafamilial communication, cascade screening, and lifelong surveillance. Advocacy entails timely identification of at-risk individuals, facilitating referrals to specialized services, and informed decision-making for testing. Active coping enhances lifelong adaptation and management of disease risk. Effective intrafamilial communication of predisposition to hereditary disease supports cascade testing of unaffected at-risk relatives. Lifelong surveillance is essential for identifying recurrence, changes in health status, and disease trajectory for life-threatening and for life-altering conditions.
Discussion: ACCESS provides a standardized, systematic, situational, and unifying guide to practice and is applicable for nursing and for other healthcare professions. When appropriately enacted it will contribute towards equitable access to genomic resources and services.
1 Introduction
While the “genomic era” introduced a new understanding of health and illness, it is paralleled by significant disparities in accessing genomic services and benefiting from technological advances, raising concerns about growing disparities in healthcare (National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, 2018). Genomic disparities affect patients, at-risk individuals, and families and are particularly prominent for racial, ethnic, and gender minorities, and for children, medically underserved, and geographically dispersed groups. Barriers to genomic healthcare are multilevel and include health finance structures, societal and cultural norms, provider bias, and concerns of discrimination and misuse of genomic information. An important contributor to genomic disparities is the relative lack of genetic specialists (Baars M et al., 2005; Ormond et al., 2018).
Nurses are the most numerous and among the most trusted of health professionals with a global workforce of 27.9 million (World Health Organization, 2020) and provide services to various settings, from remote rural areas to highly specialized centers. Nurses can play an important role in genomic healthcare after integrating genomic competences in nursing practice (Calzone et al., 2010). However, there is a need for a unifying model to guide nursing practice and surmount the growing genomic health disparities. To fill this gap, this Perspective presents ACCESS, an empirically-based theoretical framework that was developed by a panel of nurses from different countries and healthcare systems, studying different populations and genomic conditions.
2 Methods
ACCESS is based on a structured, rigorous process synthesizing empirical evidence with diverse populations in terms of gender, race and ethnicity, geography, and healthcare systems. It utilizes findings from more than sixty peer-reviewed publications of the investigators involved in the development of the framework over the past 18 years (2005–2023) on “common”, life-threatening conditions, e.g., hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), and on rare, life-altering conditions, e.g., Kallmann syndrome (Supplementary Table S1). The development of ACCESS involved a four-step sequential process, i.e., reflection, mapping, refinement, and validation, with iterative review and discussion at each step. The framework is based on the critical assumption that nursing employs a person- and family-centered approach to care. First, investigators identified salient findings from their published work and reflected on broad themes running through studies to identify desired “key” outcomes for reducing disparities and improving genomic healthcare. Second, identified outcomes were mapped across populations, countries, and healthcare systems to chart similarities and coherence. Third, themes were organized according to the continuum of care, from primary prevention to rehabilitation. Last, as a validation step, and a safeguard against potential bias, we juxtaposed our findings against studies focusing on genomic disparities that were identified by a systematic scoping review and a health policy analysis that examined the current state of genomics in nursing (Puddester et al., 2023; Thomas et al., 2023).
3 Results
ACCESS stands for Advocating, Coping, Communication, cascadE Screening, and Surveillance and provides a standardized, systematic, situational, and unifying guide to enable practicing nurses contribute towards decreasing disparities in genomic healthcare (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1. Schematic of the ACCESS framework. ACCESS proceeds from advocating for equitable access to care, to providing decisional support, to supporting active coping that precedes intra-familial communication of risk and cascade screening of relatives, and is followed by ongoing surveillance. Image credits: thenounproject.com.
3.1 Advocating for access to services
Advocacy involves timely identification of at-risk individuals, facilitating access to reliable services, and promoting informed decision-making for testing as a prerequisite to decisions aligned with individual values and preferences. Advocating for access to services involves nurses, especially in primary care, taking a detailed medical history and a three-generation family history to identify at-risk individuals and refer them to specialized services. Addressing out-of-pocket costs and insurance barriers remove roadblocks to genomic services, especially for those who are less likely to have genetic testing due to financial barriers. In countries with national or mandatory insurance coverage (e.g., Switzerland, Korea, Israel), variations in insurance coverage may create disparities in accessing testing or potentially lifesaving risk-reducing surgeries (Barnoy et al., 2023).
Health literacy barriers among underserved, low income, and less educated communities hinders integration of genomic information in health decision-making. Nurses can reach individuals with limited health literacy and numeracy and increase access to genomic healthcare by using professional competencies in patient education and outreach, along with culturally and linguistically appropriate education materials. Effective strategies include limiting the amount of information delivered in one counseling session, using lay language and understandable and actionable terms, assessing patient comprehension, employing “teach-back” strategies, and employing digital health technologies (Barr et al., 2018).
3.2 Active coping and family communication
A family-based approach to communicating risk for genomic diseases can leverage bonds within a family network and can reach individuals with irregular interactions with healthcare providers. However, it is not uncommon for individuals with disease-causing variants to conceal genomic information from first-degree relatives as well as from more distant or estranged relatives (Srinivasan et al., 2020). Family communication involves navigating and managing complex and potentially conflicting individual and family needs. The process is most effective when individuals engage in active coping strategies (e.g., seek expert advice and support) as opposed to avoidant coping. Active coping precedes management of disease risk, while intra-familial communication is essential for subsequent cascade testing of relatives. This is especially important under the current regulatory milieu that precludes direct contact between healthcare providers and at-risk relatives without the consent of the tested individual (Henrikson et al., 2020). Individuals with disease-causing variants need support to initiate disclosure of testing results to relatives, and relatives’ active coping response will lead to seeking reliable information and support from healthcare professionals, and to an informed decision regarding initiating or forging cascade testing. Nurses can support and empower individuals with disease-causing variants by adopting a patient-centered, tailored approach that fosters therapeutic relationships and open dialogue, considering the realm of the individual, family, and healthcare system.
3.3 Cascade genetic screening
Using genetic testing to identify asymptomatic individuals with disease-causing pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants is an important genomic public health intervention. Cascade screening refers to the process of extending genomic services to biological relatives of individuals harboring disease-causing P/LP variant(s) to inform risk management of relatives, while decreasing unnecessary healthcare expenditures for relatives that test negative. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Public Health Genomics classifies HBOC, Lynch syndrome (LS), and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) as “Tier-1” genetic conditions (Khoury and Dotson, 2021). Tier 1 conditions are identified through genetic testing, and are actionable, meaning that implementing evidence-based guidelines can result in improved, measurable public health outcomes. Cascade screening involves asymptomatic individuals being educated about and considering testing for the P/LP variant in the family. Cascade screening enables asymptomatic individuals to access specialized services, receive accurate information, and initiate appropriate risk management.
Post-testing consultation usually includes a discussion about cascade screening yet, this aspect typically represents a relatively small portion of the patient encounter. Cascade screening may be more likely when healthcare providers have direct contact with relatives (Frey et al., 2022). However, approximately 70% of countries worldwide have in place legislation regarding privacy and protection of personal information, including genomic information (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2021). Such legislation precludes healthcare providers from directly contacting at-risk relatives. Nurse-led, pre- and/or post-genetic testing consultations focused on enhancing active coping and family communication can also facilitate disclosure of genomic information and catalyze cascade genetic screening. A nurse-led cascade screening program for FH in Western Australia demonstrated cost-effectiveness and reduced incident of cardiovascular disease by 25%–50% over 10 years (Ademi et al., 2014). A cascade genetic screening program for FH in the Netherlands, facilitated by specialized nurses who carried out home visits for consent, pre-testing counseling, blood sampling for genetic testing, and collection of personal and family data, yielded a participation rate of 90% within the first 5 years, and identified approximately 3% of the FH population in the Netherlands (Umans-Eckenhausen et al., 2001). Within 20 years, the program has identified and treated an estimated 42% of the total FH population in the Netherlands (Besseling et al., 2015).
3.4 Ongoing surveillance
After receiving a genomic diagnosis, individuals face multiple health- and life-altering decisions that relate to risk-reducing and screening behaviors, reproduction, interpersonal relationships, occupation, and career. Continuity of care and long-term patient-provider relationships are the basis for assessing psychosocial adaptation to living with a genetic diagnosis. For individuals harboring P/LP variants in genes underlying life-threatening conditions (e.g., HBOC), ongoing surveillance with biomarkers and serial imaging is critical for managing risk and detecting cancer (re)occurrence. For rare, non-life-threatening diseases (e.g., Kallmann syndrome), ongoing surveillance is essential for monitoring disease progression and for comprehensive chronic care. The therapeutic relationship that grows from continuity of care helps identify patients’ challenges and creates opportunities to intervene with education and counseling or appropriate referrals (e.g., reproductive specialists), thus, supporting comprehensive, coordinated, inter-professional care.
3.5 Applying the ACCESS framework to nursing practice
ACCESS provides a standardized, systematic, situational, and unifying guide to nursing practice that enables practicing nurses to help close disparities in genomic healthcare. ACCESS embeds genomics in already established professional nursing roles, which when appropriately enacted, enable equitable access to genomic resources and services. Table 1 provides concrete examples of nursing practice relating to each of the components.
TABLE 1. Examples of applying the ACCESS framework to nursing practice.
4 Discussion
Evidence of growing genomic health disparities and implications for individuals, families, and communities present an urgent call for action. A number of barriers must be overcome to ameliorate genomic disparities and harness the full potential of genomics for improving prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment for individuals, families, and communities. Nursing has a long history of promoting self-care and delivering holistic person-, family-, and community-centered care, that is built on sound assessment, effective communication, and therapeutic education (Fee and Bu, 2010). To keep pace with the growing integration of genomics into healthcare delivery, nurses at all levels of practice must apply relevant competencies in practice. Nurses are the most numerous of trained healthcare professionals (World Health Organization, 2020), involved in interprofessional care delivered in ambulatory and community-based facilities, hospitals, and integrated healthcare systems. Nurses provide care in a variety of settings ranging from remote, rural, and medically underserved communities to urban and tertiary care settings. Most importantly, nurses and nursing practice worldwide are governed by the International Council of Nurses Code of Ethics, which is concerned with issues of privacy, confidentiality, advocacy, equity, and responsibility (International Council of Nurses, 2021). Specifically, article 1.3 clarifies that nurses ensure that the individual and family receive understandable, accurate, sufficient and timely information on which to base decisions for care and treatment. Articles 1.4 and 1.5 hold nurses accountable towards confidentiality of personal information and respect for privacy of individuals needing care. Specifically, article 2.9 discusses explicitly the role of nursing in safeguarding privacy and autonomy of decision-making regarding genomic information and fostering access to genomic technologies. Finally, articles 1.6, 1.7, 4.5, and 4.7 hold nurses responsible for initiating and supporting actions that meet the health and social needs of all people, collaborate with other disciplines to uncover social determinants of health, and advocate and promote equity and social justice in accessing healthcare and other social and economic services. As such, nurses worldwide are uniquely positioned to play a key role in bridging disparities in genomic healthcare. Nursing actions include safeguarding individual rights to privacy and confidentiality, advocating for equitable access to genomic services, as well as monitoring and calling out health practices and policies that contribute to widening healthcare disparities or to discriminatory practices related to genomic information.
We posit that ACCESS is a novel, simple, yet, practical framework that can be part of a multi-level approach to increase integration of genomic care into nursing practice. Importantly, the framework is not disease-specific, but rather it is flexible and relevant for a broad range of conditions and healthcare systems. Although ACCESS was initiated by and builds on work of an international nursing consortium, it is applicable to other disciplines involved in genomic healthcare, ranging from direct care provision at the bedside to health policy. The universal shortage of genomic specialists requires that healthcare providers and policymakers seek for novel and sustainable solutions regarding widespread implementation of germline testing. This is in addition to the need for streamlining educational efforts regarding implications of genetic testing, especially for prevention and targeted therapeutics (Al-Sukhun et al., 2023; Brown et al., 2023; Moyo et al., 2023). Implementation of a systematic guide like the ACCESS framework, and partnering with the nursing workforce who is a major stakeholder in promoting health equity, may facilitate initiatives such as the Rare Genomes Project (RGP) (Serrano et al., 2023) and the Genomic Answers for Kids (GA4K) (Kane et al., 2023) reduce barriers and inequalities for underrepresented patients with rare genomic disorders and for children, respectively. Disparities are a global concern of patients and families, communities, providers, health systems, and public health agencies and are among the most anticipated challenges for healthcare policy for the next decade (Dolan et al., 2023; Hull et al., 2023; Phillips et al., 2023). Ameliorating healthcare disparities, including genomic disparities, requires a unifying, comprehensive, and multilevel approach that can be embraced by and enacted upon across disciplines (e.g., bioethics, genetic counseling, medical genetics, medicine, nursing, social work, etc.). The components of ACCESS can be integrated both into education and practice as a standardized and systematic guide that can help create and maintain a pipeline of trained healthcare professionals who are vigilant about genomic disparities and engage in actions that equitably improve health and wellbeing for patients, families, and communities.
One potential limitation is that the ACCESS framework is that it is based on empirical evidence from studies conducted by the members of our consortium and not on a systematic literature search. Although members of our consortium conducted their studies worldwide, in a variety of settings, and with diverse patient populations, we cannot preclude the possibility of bias. However, the components of the ACCESS framework are consistent with conclusions of a recently published scoping review that examined health disparities and the current state of genomics in nursing (Thomas et al., 2023) and with other primary studies and systematic reviews referenced in this Perspective. Nevertheless, we propose that future studies should focus on implementation of the framework and evaluation of its effectiveness with rigorous research designs.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
MK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. CP: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. SB: Formal Analysis, Resources, Writing–review and editing. ED: Formal Analysis, Resources, Writing–review and editing. MF: Formal Analysis, Resources, Writing–review and editing. TJ: Formal Analysis, Resources, Writing–review and editing. SK: Formal Analysis, Resources, Writing–review and editing. MU-B: Formal Analysis, Resources, Writing–review and editing. MU: Formal Analysis, Resources, Writing–review and editing. AD: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Swiss Cancer Research Foundation KFS-5293-02-2021 (PI: MK), Israel Cancer Research Fund—2020PG-0034 (PIs: SB and ED), National Cancer Institute 1K01CA241393-01 (PI: TJ), Korean National Science Foundation NRF 2019K1A3A1A14063080 (PI: SK), National Cancer Institute 1R01CA263532-01A1 (Co-I: MU-B), International Society for Nurses in Genetics Research Grant (PI: MU), Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation (PI: AD).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2023.1337366/full#supplementary-material
References
Ademi, Z., Watts, G. F., Pang, J., Sijbrands, E. J., van Bockxmeer, F. M., O'Leary, P., et al. (2014). Cascade screening based on genetic testing is cost-effective: evidence for the implementation of models of care for familial hypercholesterolemia. J. Clin. Lipidol. 8 (4), 390–400. doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2014.05.008
Al-Sukhun, S., Masannat, Y., Wegman-Ostrosky, T., Shrikhande, S. V., Manirakiza, A., Fadelu, T., et al. (2023). Germline testing around the globe: challenges in different practice settings. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. book 43, e390522. doi:10.1200/EDBK_390522
Baars, M., Henneman, L., and Ten Kate, L. (2005). Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem. Genet. Med. 7, 605–610. doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000182895.28432.c7
Barnoy, S., Dagan, E., Kim, S., Caiata-Zufferey, M., and Katapodi, M. C.the CASCADE, and the K-CASCADE Consortia (2023). Privacy and utility of genetic testing in families with hereditary cancer syndromes living in three countries: the International Cascade Genetic Screening experience. Front. Genet. 14, 1109431. doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1109431
Barr, J. A., Tsai, L. P., Welch, A., Faradz, S. M. H., Lane-Krebs, K., Howie, V., et al. (2018). Current practice for genetic counselling by nurses: an integrative review. Int. J. Nurs. Pract. 24 (2), e12629. doi:10.1111/ijn.12629
Besseling, J., Sjouke, B., and Kastelein, J. J. (2015). Screening and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia - lessons from the past and opportunities for the future (based on the Anitschkow Lecture 2014). Atherosclerosis 241 (2), 597–606. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.06.011
Brown, J. T., McGonagle, E., Seifert, R., Speedie, M., and Jacobson, P. A. (2023). Addressing disparities in pharmacogenomics through rural and underserved workforce education. Front. Genet. 13, 1082985. doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.1082985
Calzone, K. A., Cashion, A., Feetham, S., Jenkins, J., Prows, C. A., Williams, J. K., et al. (2010). Nurses transforming health care using genetics and genomics. Nurs. Outlook 58 (1), 26–35. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2009.05.001
Dolan, D. D., Cho, M. K., and Lee, S. S. (2023). Innovating for a just and equitable future in genomic and precision medicine research. Am. J. Bioeth. 23 (7), 1–4. doi:10.1080/15265161.2023.2215201
Fee, E., and Bu, L. (2010). The origins of public health nursing: the henry street visiting nurse service. Am. J. Public Health 100 (7), 1206–1207. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.186049
Frey, M. K., Ahsan, M. D., Bergeron, H., Lin, J., Li, X., Fowlkes, R. K., et al. (2022). Cascade testing for hereditary cancer syndromes: should we move toward direct relative contact? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Oncol. 40, 4129–4143. doi:10.1200/JCO.22.00303
Henrikson, N. B., Wagner, J. K., Hampel, H., DeVore, C., Shridhar, N., Williams, J. L., et al. (2020). What guidance does HIPAA offer to providers considering familial risk notification and cascade genetic testing? J. Law Biosci. 7 (1), lsaa071. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsaa071
Hull, S. C., Brody, L. C., and Sterling, R. (2023). Getting it right: how public engagement might (and might not) help us determine what is equitable in genomics and precision medicine. Am. J. Bioeth. 23 (7), 5–8. doi:10.1080/15265161.2023.2215154
International Council of Nurses (2021). The ICN Code of Ethics for nurses revised 2021. Available at: https://www.icn.ch/sites/default/files/2023-06/ICN_Code-of-Ethics_EN_Web.pdf (Accessed November 26, 2023).
Kane, N. J., Cohen, A. S. A., Berrios, C., Jones, B., Pastinen, T., and Hoffman, M. A. (2023). Committing to genomic answers for all kids: evaluating inequity in genomic research enrollment. Genet. Med. 25 (9), 100895. doi:10.1016/j.gim.2023.100895
Khoury, M. J., and Dotson, W. D. (2021). From genes to public health: are we ready for DNA-based population screening? Genet. Med. 23 (6), 996–998. doi:10.1038/s41436-021-01141-w
Moyo, E., Moyo, P., Mashe, T., Dzobo, M., Chitungo, I., and Dzinamarira, T. (2023). Implementation of public health genomics in africa: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, challenges, and recommendations. J. Med. Virology 95 (1), e28295. doi:10.1002/jmv.28295
National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (2018). Understanding disparities in access to genomic medicine: proceedings of a workshop. US: National Academies Press.
Ormond, K. E., Laurino, M. Y., Barlow-Stewart, K., Wessels, T. M., Macaulay, S., Austin, J., et al. (2018). Genetic counseling globally: where are we now? Am. J. Med. Genet. Part C Seminars Med. Genet. 178C, 98–107. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.31607
Phillips, K. A., Marshall, D. A., Adler, L., Figueroa, J., Haeder, S. F., Hamad, R., et al. (2023). Ten health policy challenges for the next 10 years. Health Aff. Sch. 1 (1), qxad010. doi:10.1093/haschl/qxad010
Puddester, R., Limoges, J., Dewell, S., Maddigan, J., Carlsson, L., and Pike, A. (2023). The Canadian landscape of genetics and genomics in nursing: a policy document analysis. Can. J. Nurs. Res. 55 (4), 494–509. doi:10.1177/08445621231159164
Serrano, J. G., O'Leary, M., VanNoy, G. E., Mangilog, B. E., Holm, I. A., Fraiman, Y. S., et al. (2023). Advancing understanding of inequities in rare disease genomics. Clin. Ther. 45 (8), 745–753. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.06.010
Srinivasan, S., Won, N. Y., Dotson, W. D., Wright, S. T., and Roberts, M. C. (2020). Barriers and facilitators for cascade testing in genetic conditions: a systematic review. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 28 (12), 1631–1644. doi:10.1038/s41431-020-00725-5
Thomas, J., Keels, J., Calzone, K. A., Badzek, L., Dewell, S., Patch, C., et al. (2023). Current state of genomics in nursing: a scoping review of healthcare provider oriented (clinical and educational) outcomes (2012–2022). Genes 14 (11), 2013. doi:10.3390/genes14112013
Umans-Eckenhausen, M. A., Defesche, J. C., Sijbrands, E. J., Scheerder, R. L., and Kastelein, J. J. (2001). Review of first 5 years of screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia in The Netherlands. Lancet 357 (9251), 165–168. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03587-X
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2021). Data protection and privacy legislation worldwide. Available at: https://unctad.org/page/data-protection-and-privacy-legislation-worldwide (Accessed November 18, 2023).
World Health Organization (2020). State of the world's nursing 2020: investing in education, jobs and leadership. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240003279 (Accessed November 9, 2023).
Keywords: international perspective, nursing practice, interprofessional collaboration, nursing code of ethics, advocacy, family communication and coping, cascade genetic testing, surveillance
Citation: Katapodi MC, Pedrazzani C, Barnoy S, Dagan E, Fluri M, Jones T, Kim S, Underhill-Blazey ML, Uveges MK and Dwyer AA (2024) ACCESS: an empirically-based framework developed by the International Nursing CASCADE Consortium to address genomic disparities through the nursing workforce. Front. Genet. 14:1337366. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1337366
Received: 12 November 2023; Accepted: 14 December 2023;
Published: 08 January 2024.
Edited by:
Georgi Iskrov, Plovdiv Medical University, BulgariaReviewed by:
Kathleen Anne Calzone, National Cancer Institute (NIH), United StatesIgnacio Macpherson, International University of Catalonia, Spain
Rachele Hendricks-Sturrup, Duke University, United States
Copyright © 2024 Katapodi, Pedrazzani, Barnoy, Dagan, Fluri, Jones, Kim, Underhill-Blazey, Uveges and Dwyer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Maria C. Katapodi, maria.katapodi@unibas.ch; Andrew A. Dwyer, andrew.dwyer@bc.edu