Impact Factor 4.716 | CiteScore 4.71
More on impact ›

Review ARTICLE Provisionally accepted The full-text will be published soon. Notify me

Front. Immunol. | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02668

Mechanisms of graft-versus-host disease prevention by post-transplantation cyclophosphamide: an evolving understanding

  • 1Other, United States
  • 2National Cancer Institute (NCI), United States

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has been highly successful at preventing severe acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The clinical application of this approach was based on extensive studies in major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-matched murine skin allografting models, in which cyclophosphamide was believed to act via three main mechanisms: 1) selective elimination of alloreactive T cells; 2) intrathymic clonal deletion of alloreactive T-cell precursors; and 3) induction of suppressive T cells. In these models, cyclophosphamide was only effective in very specific contexts, requiring particular cell dose, cell source, PTCy dose, and recipient age. Achievement of transient mixed chimerism also was required. Furthermore, these studies showed differences in the impact of cyclophosphamide on transplanted cells (tumor) versus tissue (skin grafts), including the ability of cyclophosphamide to prevent rejection of the former but not the latter after MHC-mismatched transplants. Yet, clinically PTCy has demonstrated efficacy in MHC-matched or partially-MHC-mismatched HCT across a wide array of patients and HCT platforms. Importantly, clinically significant acute GVHD occurs frequently after PTCy, inconsistent with alloreactive T-cell elimination, whereas PTCy appears most active against severe acute GVHD and chronic GVHD. These differences between murine skin allografting and clinical HCT suggest that the above-mentioned mechanisms may not be responsible for GVHD prevention by PTCy. Indeed, recent work by our group in murine HCT has shown that PTCy does not eliminate alloreactive T cells nor is the thymus necessary for PTCy’s efficacy. Instead, other mechanisms appear to be playing important roles, including: 1) reduction of alloreactive CD4+ T-cell proliferation; 2) induced functional impairment of surviving alloreactive effector T cells; and 3) preferential recovery of CD4+ regulatory T cells. Herein, we review the history of cyclophosphamide’s use in preventing murine skin allograft rejection and our evolving new understanding of the mechanisms underlying its efficacy in preventing GVHD after HCT. Efforts are ongoing to more fully refine and elaborate this proposed new working model. The completion of this effort will provide critical insight relevant for the rational design of novel approaches to improve outcomes for PTCy-treated patients and for the induction of tolerance in other clinical contexts.

Keywords: Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide, Haploidentical allergenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, Graft Versus Host Desease, Skin allograft rejection, Alloreactive T cells, tolerance

Received: 12 Jul 2019; Accepted: 28 Oct 2019.

Copyright: © 2019 Nunes and Kanakry. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Dr. Christopher G. Kanakry, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Rockville, United States, christopher.kanakry@nih.gov