Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.
Sec. Vaccines and Molecular Therapeutics
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1376734
This article is part of the Research Topic Vaccination and Immunosenescence View all 3 articles

Deletion of an immune evasion gene, steD, from a live Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium vaccine improves vaccine responses in aged mice

Provisionally accepted
Jessica Allen Jessica Allen Shanaliz S. Natta Shanaliz S. Natta Shamima Nasrin Shamima Nasrin Franklin R. Toapanta Franklin R. Toapanta Sharon Tennant Sharon Tennant *
  • Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) generally causes self-limiting gastroenteritis. However, older adults (≥65 years) can experience invasive disease and higher hospitalization and case fatality rates due to NTS infection. We have previously shown that CVD 1926 (I77 ∆guaBA ∆clpP ∆pipA ∆htrA) was immunogenic in adult but not aged mice. Here we describe a modified live attenuated vaccine strain harboring a deletion in steD, a Salmonella effector responsible for host immune escape, which we hypothesized would be more immunogenic in aged mice. Methods: Mel Juso and/or mutuDC cells were infected with S. Typhimurium I77, CVD 1926, and their respective steD mutants, and the MHC-II levels were evaluated. Aged (18-month-old) C57BL/6 mice received two doses of PBS, CVD 1926, or CVD 1926 ∆steD perorally and the number of FliC-specific CD4 + T cells were determined. Lastly, aged C57BL/6 mice received three doses of PBS, CVD 1926, or CVD 1926 ∆steD perorally and then were challenged perorally with wild-type S. Typhimurium SL1344. These animals were also evaluated for antibody responses. Results: MHC-II induction was higher in cells treated with steD mutants, compared to their respective parental strains. Compared to PBS-vaccinated mice, CVD 1926 ∆steD elicited significantly more FliC-specific CD4 + T cells in the Peyer's Patches. There were no significant differences in FliC-specific CD4 + T cells in the Peyer's patches or spleen of CVD 1926versus PBS-immunized mice. CVD 1926and CVD 1926 ∆steD induced similar serum and fecal anti-core and O polysaccharide antibody titers after three doses. After two immunizations, the proportion of seroconverters for CVD 1926 ∆steD was 83% (10/12) compared to 42% (5/12) for CVD 1926. Compared to PBS-immunized mice, mice immunized with CVD 1926 ∆steD had significantly lower S. Typhimurium counts in the spleen, cecum, and small intestine upon challenge. In contrast, there were no differences in bacterial loads in the tissues of PBS-vaccinated and CVD 1926-immunized animals. Conclusion: These data suggest that the steD deletion enhanced the immunogenicity of our live attenuated S. Typhimurium vaccine. Deletion of immune evasion genes could be a potential strategy to improve the immunogenicity of live attenuated vaccines in older adults.

    Keywords: Salmonella, Vaccine, Live-attenuated, immunosenescence, Immune Evasion

    Received: 26 Jan 2024; Accepted: 07 May 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Allen, Natta, Nasrin, Toapanta and Tennant. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Sharon Tennant, Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, 21201-1509, Maryland, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.