Frontiers journals are at the top of citation and impact metrics

Original Research ARTICLE Provisionally accepted The full-text will be published soon. Notify me

Front. Mar. Sci. | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00442

Implementing Ecosystem Approaches to Fishery Management: Risk Assessment in the US Mid-Atlantic

  • 1Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NOAA), United States
  • 2Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NOAA), United States
  • 3Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Council, United States
  • 4Consultant, United States

Fishery managers worldwide are evaluating methods for incorporating climate, habitat, ecological, social, and economic factors into current operations in order to implement Ecosystem Approaches to Fishery Management (EAFM). While this can seem overwhelming, it is possible to take practical steps towards EAFM implementation that make use of existing information and provide managers with valuable strategic advice. Here, we describe the process used by the U.S. Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) to develop an ecosystem-level risk assessment, the initial step proposed in their recently adopted EAFM guidance document. The Council first defined five types of Risk Elements (ecological, economic, social, food production, management) and identified which management objectives aligned with each element. Based on an existing ecosystem status report for the region and other existing sources (including expert opinion), potential ecological, social, economic, and management indicators were identified for each risk element. Finally, low, low-moderate, moderate-high, and high risk criteria were defined for each indicator, and the indicator data were used to score each risk element using the criteria. The ultimate outcome is a ranked risk assessment in order to focus on the highest risk issues for further evaluation and mitigation. The risk assessment highlights certain species and certain management issues as posing higher cumulative risks to meeting Council management objectives when considering a broad range of ecological, social, and economic factors. Tabular color coded summaries of risk assessment results will be used by the Council to prioritize further EAFM analyses as well as research plans over the coming five years. As ecosystem reporting and operational EAFM continue to evolve in future years, the Council foresees integrating these efforts so that ecosystem indicators are refined to meet the needs of fishery managers in identifying and managing risks to achieving ecological, social, and economic fishery objectives. Overall, ecosystem indicator-based risk assessment is a method that can be adapted to a wide range of resource management systems and available information, and therefore represent a promising way forward in the implementation of EAFM.

Keywords: Ecosystem Approach, natural resource management, Risk Assessment, Fisheries, Integrated Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystem indicators, Economic indicators, Management objectives

Received: 13 Jul 2018; Accepted: 05 Nov 2018.

Edited by:

Simone Libralato, Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale (OGS), Italy

Reviewed by:

Brett W. Molony, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development of Western Australia (DPIRD), Australia
Catherine S. Longo, Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), United Kingdom  

Copyright: © 2018 Gaichas, DePiper, Seagraves, Muffley, Sabo, Colburn and Loftus. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Dr. Sarah K. Gaichas, Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NOAA), Woods Hole, 02543-1026, Massachusetts, United States, Sarah.Gaichas@noaa.gov