Differential Methylation in Promoter Regions of the Genes NR3C1 and HSP90AA1, Involved in the Regulation, and Bioavailability of Cortisol in Leukocytes of Women With Preeclampsia
Quitzia Torres-Salazar1,2 
Yolanda Martínez-López1 Miguel Reyes-Romero2 
Rebeca Pérez-Morales3 Antonio Sifuentes-Álvarez2,4 
Jaime Salvador-Moysén1*- 1Instituto de Investigación Científica, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango, Mexico
- 2Facultad de Medicina y Nutrición, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango, Mexico
- 3Facultad de Ciencias Químicas Campus Gómez Palacio, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Durango, Mexico
- 4Hospital Materno Infantil del Estado de Durango, Durango, Mexico
Introduction: Hypertensive disorders are of interest in obstetrics and gynecology because they are the second place among causes of maternal mortality and a source of complications in the short, mid, and long term. Even if the pathophysiological process behind preeclampsia (PE) is still unknown, stress factors have been revealed to play an important role in the genesis of this pathologic process.
Methods: A case-control study was designed with the purpose of determining if there is a differential methylation in NR3C1, HSD11B2, CYP11A1, CRHBP, TEAD3, and HSP90AA1 genes, related to signaling of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, and its regulation on early-onset PE (EOPE).
Results: A total of 20 cases and 20 controls were studied by DNA methylation analysis, demonstrating differences among groups in the percentage of methylation of the NR3C1 gene. After a contingency analysis, an odds ratio (OR) for PE of 12.25 was identified for NR3C1 and 9.9 for HSP90AA1 genes. NR3C1, TEAD3, and HSP90AA1 genes showed a positive correlation with the systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels with a p ≤ 0.05.
Conclusion: This study found a differential methylation in the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) NR3C1 and its co-chaperone HSP90AA1 in women with PE, with a possible regulatory role in the response to stress in pregnancy and is a likely physiopathological mechanism in PE.
Introduction
Preeclampsia (PE) is a multisystemic syndrome of pregnancy and the puerperium, with a reduction of systemic perfusion, generated by vasospasm and the activation of coagulation systems (1). Approximately 10–15% of maternity deaths are directly associated with PE, with an estimated toll of 75,000 maternal deaths and 500,000 neonatal deaths per year. In Mexico, it constitutes the main cause of death associated with complications during pregnancy and represents 34% of the total maternal mortality (2).
It has been proven that the risk of developing PE is related to the maternal psychosocial status during pregnancy, requiring the evaluation of family and marital and social conditions. A disproportionate response to stress results in a metabolic derailment in the regulation by the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis (3). Likewise, maternal stress and/or a rise of glutocorticoids in utero is associated with low birth weight and metabolic disorders among the offsping, in adulthood (4). PE is a syndrome of idiopathic origin that can present manifestations in practically all apparatuses and systems of the fetus–maternal binomial. The causal framework of PE is still poorly understood, but the literature is inclined to explain it through the deficient processes of placentation (5).
Various studies have documented an association between adverse cultural and psychosocial situations with a high frequency of gestational morbimortality (6, 7). Research-based approaches establish a clear association between a context characterized by high social stressors and low psychosocial support with the expression of PE. Studies in the area of psychoneuroimmunoendocrinology have shown that individuals exposed to chronic stress, anxiety, and/or other factors undergo immunologic disorders, suggesting that stress and emotions interfere with immunoregulatory mechanisms (8). Glucocorticoids produced in the adrenal cortex, in response to the signals from the HPA axis, can affect different cellular functions during pregnancy. It has also been reported that in pregnant women with PE, a premature rise of placental cortisol, joined by a reduced activity of the enzyme 11-beta-hydroxyesteroid dehydrogenase type 2 (HSD11B2), transforms cortisol into cortisone. Glucocorticoids also inhibit the luteinizing hormone (LH), estrogens, progesterone, and the ovarian steroid hormones. Significantly, a high activity of glucocorticoids established by an increase in the levels of cortisol in circulation or the altered metabolism of cortisol can lead to a resistance to insulin, closely associated with hypertension and endothelial resistance—characteristics observed along with PE (9).
The association between PE and epigenetic alterations of the placenta (6–8) has been recently reported. The maternal epigenome has a unique history that can be useful to study in order to understand its susceptibility to develop PE, as well as to detect it in its early stages (10). Contrary to the genotype (non-modifiable), epigenetics can confer a degree of phenotypic plasticity linked to stress, nutrition, or any other change in the environment, allowing the fetus to respond to the environment and making changes in the genetic expresion in accordance to this. Furthermore, if the epigenetic alterations occur in the gametes, these can be inherited and can bring phenotypic consequences to the next generation; for example, the possibility of epigenetic disorders previous to conception or during pregnancy can increase the susceptibility to PE (10).
A study describes a different pathophysiological behavior in early-onset PE (EOPE) and in late-onset PE (LOPE). They informed, in a case-control study, that in EOPE, a differential percentage of methylated DNA in CpG sites in genes encode for the receptor of glucocorticoids (NR3C1) and binding protein to CRH (CRHBP) (11). In othes studies are described the association between the degree of the methylation of the promoters of the gene NR3C1, with the presence of normotension, hypotension, and hypertension in a group of pregnant women, and how these can be found present independently from confounding variables such as tobacco use, family history of High Blood Pressure (HBP), or body mass index (BMI) (12, 13).
The purpose of this work was to determine if there is a differential methylation in NR3C1, HSD11B2, CYP11A1, CRHBP, TEAD3, and HSP90AA1 genes related to signaling of the HPA axis and its regulation on EOPE.
Materials and Methods
Subjects
The present study was revised and approved by the Commitee of Ethics in Research of the General Hospital of Durango with registration number 456/015.
A paired case-control study was designed. The cases were pospartum women with (1) EOPE diagnosis, (2) pregnancy between 20 and 34 weeks of gestation, (3) age between 18 and 45, and (4) residents of the State of Durango, México. The participants in the control group were pospartum women without any complications. The groups were paired individually by age, place of residence, and pregnancy stage.
The size of the sample was calculated with the aid of SigmaPlot software, considering a minimal methylation difference to detect 12% among the study groups, a power of 95%, and an α value of 0.05, resulting in the groups composed of 20 cases and 20 controls.
Patients excluded from the study were all women with comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, psychiatric illness, antiphospholipid syndrome, Down syndrome, ischemic cardiopathy, kidney diseases) and women who presented PE in previous pregnancies, multiple pregnancies, hydatidiform mole, and miscarriages.
We used a case report format for the recollection of sociodemographic data. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2013 criteria for the diagnosis of PE were considered, which include (1) systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, (2) pregnancy of more than 20 weeks of gestation, and (3) ≥300 mg proteinuria in 24-h urine or ≥1+ in test strip (14).
Measures and Samples
Blood pressure was determined by an OMRONHEM7121 sphygmomanometer, the gestation week was inferred by ultrasound and proteinuria by urine analyses. The 24-h urine sample was used for the determination of proteinuria; the sample was collected into a sterile vessel. In a maximum period of 24 h postpartum, peripheral blood samples (BD Vacutainer® EDTA 4 ml) were collected from each participant. All the samples were frozen until the moment of their analysis, for DNA purification utilizing the standardized procedure described by Iranpur et al. (15). The quantification of DNA (A 260 nm), as well as the determination of purity (A 260/280), was conducted through spectrophotometry in a DU-730 Uv-Vis Bekman Coulter spectrophotometer. The DNA samples were stored at −70°C until processing in methylation assays.
DNA Methylation Analysis
An in silico study was carried out utilizing the online Eukaryotic Promoter Data Base (EDP) software to locate the CpG Islands in/or near the transcription start site of candidate genes (16). The methylation analysis was conucted via qPCR employing reagents EpiTectMethyl II qPCR Primer Assay and EpiTect II DNA Methylation Enzime Kit (Qiagen®) in accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer. The determination of the percentage of methylation with these reagents is based upon the digestion of the restriction sites with methylation-sensitive enzymes. The genomic coordinates of the analyzed CpG islands are presented in the Supplementary Table 1. The reactions of qPCR in real time were conducted in a thermal cycler ECO Illumina® (San Diego, CA) using the v.1 software. To transform the Ct values obtained from the reaction of a PCR to percentages of methylation, a spreadsheet provided by Qiagen® was employed.
Statistical Analyses
The data were analyzed with the statistical program SPSS v.21, central tendency and dispersion measures were calculated. The T-test was used to compare means between groups, in cases where medians were compared, the Mann–Withney U-test was used. The chi square test was used to compare percentages. An analysis of the correlation of clinical variables with methylation percentage was carried out employing Spearman's rho. The cutoff points for the contingency analysis were performed with the online software Cutoff Finder (17), and the odds ratio (OR) was calculated for each of the genes in the study. A value of p ≤ 0.05 of statistical significance was considered.
Results
Between October 2015 and October 2016, 830 postpartum women were screened for the study, out of which 112 presented a PE clinical condition, from whom 20 were selected by fulfilling the inclusion criteria. The sociodemographic and clinical variables of the participants are presented in Tables 1, 2.
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics from a sample of women diagnosed with preeclampsia and normotensive.
Table 2. Clinical information obtained from a sample of preclamptic women vs. normotensive.
The methylation analysis showed differences among the groups for NR3C1 gene with a median in the case group of 89.21 (interquartile range 73.3–92.2) vs. 22.1 (0.27–50) in the controls (p = 0.003) (Table 3). The methylation percentage of the genes TEAD3, HSP90AA1, CYP11A1, HSD11B2, and CRHBP did not show any statistically significant differences; however, a marginal association can be perceived in the first two, which presented significance in posterior analyses (Table 3).
Table 3. Differential methylation in the CPG islands of gene regulators of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.
The correlation analysis of clinical variables with the methylation percentage showed a direct proportional relation between the methylation and elevation of blood pressure for genes NR3C1, TEAD3, and HSP90AA1, particularly for diastolic pressure (Table 4).
Table 4. aCorrelation analisis between gene methylation and blood pressure.
Finally, a contingency analysis was performed to determine the OR in the presence or absence of PE and the methylation state of each of the genes in the study; finding ORs of 12.25 and 9.9 for NR3C1 and HSP90AA1 genes, respectively, both statistically significant. The remaining genes (CYP11A1, HSD11B2, CRHBP) did not present an association with the developmet of PE (Table 5).
Table 5. Hipermethylation frequencya in the genes of study.
Discussion and Conclusions
In this study, differences in the percentage of DNA leukocyte methylation in the study groups were demonstrated, particularly in that which refers to the NR3C1 gene. This result is congruent with that reported by Hogg et al. (11) who described higher methylation in the placenta of women with EOPE when compared with healthy controls.
With reference to genes CYP11A1, TEAD3, HSD11B2, HSP90AA1, and CRHBP, when a clustering categorization is executed, we obtain significant differences in NR3C1 and HSP90AA1 genes, presenting 12.25 and 9.9 more probability of developing PE in those women in hypermethylation states in comparison with those who presented a lower methylation, with 95% CI that is statistically significant. The results are also consistent with that reported in 2017 by Dwi Putra et al. (12) who found an association between the regulation of blood pressure in pregnant women and the methylation of the promoter of NR3C1.
Even though there are no reports in the literature that directly relate methylation of this co-chaperone with PE, Ilona et al. (18) demonstrated an association between the expression of the heat shock protein HSP70 and pregnancy complications. In other HSP proteins, like 27, 60, and 90, no differences were found due to the small size of the sample. Our findigs agree with the theoretical foundation of the function of the co-chaperone HSP90, which promotes the maturation of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), parting from an appropriate folding state in conformity to where it has a high cortisol affinity.
Only concluding data are presented in the differences found in NR3C1 and HSP90AA1. Although a disparity was observed among the medians of other genes in the study (CYP11A1, TEAD3), this did not achieve a statistical significance of <0.05; however, we propose that they serve as a reference for future research, probably with a larger study sample size.
The GR exerts its function on the HPA axis, and several studies have demonstrated its expression in a wide diversity of cell types. Therefore, its regulation includes DNA methylation, alternative splicing, and translational mechanisms (19). This indicates that its regulation is very complex, and the expression-specific tissue depends on this process. However, methylation is a mechanism that has proven to be more durable; in this regard, the study reported by Tyrka et al. (20) determined that stressful events can lead to epigenetic changes that remain in leukocytes and this methylation could alter the expression of GR and contribute to the imbalance in homeostasis of the HPA axis. According to the above, methylation specifies whether it could mean a reduction in protein levels and could affect GR expression in target cells.
The results of the present report suggest that the analysis of blood methylation is a potential biomarker due to its easy access and availability at any moment of pregnancy. A marker that distinguishes women with a high or low risk can aid in the selection of patients and offer supervision with a better delivery of the available resources. One of the main challenges within the area of preventive medicine is to find biomarkers capable of identifying the onset of a disease, especially in a simple non-invasive manner.
The importance of diagnostic and prognosis PE data is due mainly to its close relationship with maternal mortality in our country and the world (156 maternal accumulated deaths in week 11 of 2018 in Mexico, 21.2% associated with pregnancy hypertensive disorders) (21). The possibility of finding potential biomarkers as well as contributing to the comprehension of the articulated pathophysiological mechanisms makes this relevant in the medical arena. An early therapeutic intervention with diverse targets, starting with the justification of using acetylsalicylic acid or low-molecular-weight heparin, as the ACOG guides suggest, and psychotherapeutical interventions for containment and stress management are some examples (18).
In spite of efforts from public health specialists to decrease its impact, in a study of 830 puerperal females, 13% of those explored were diagnosed with PE, suggesting that the problem is prevalent. Within this group, 17% had EOPE, which worsens the matter because according to the American Heart Association, PE before 34 weeks of gestation relates to a higher cardiovascular risk factor than LOPE (18).
In conclusion, this study found a differential methylation in the GR NR3C1 and its co-chaperone HSP90AA1 between preeclamptic and normotensive women, with a possible regulatory role in the response to stress in pregnancy and a possible physiopathological mechanism in PE. These findings contribute to the strengthening of the causal network paradigm previously described by other authors (6, 8, 22–24). Moreover, they support the relation between PE and an unfavorable psychosocial environment, an imbalance in allostatic factors that contribute to a limited placenta formation that can even be present before PE occurence.
Strenghts and Limitations
One of the strengths of this study is the design and its strict control of the inclusion criteria. Unfortunately, due to these criteria, a large number of women had to be excluded, resulting in a small sample that finally had an impact on the confidence intervals. Considering the relevance of our findings, studies involving a larger sample are suggested for the future, as well as the use of additional technical techniques that show protein expression or gene sequencing.
Data Availability Statement
All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Commitee of Ethics in Research of the General Hospital of Durango with registration number 456/015. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
QT-S performed experimental and statistical work, wrote the manuscript. MR-R performed the methylation analyses. AS-Á participated in the recruitment of cases. RP-M participated in the interpretation of the results, their discussion and wrote the manuscript. YM-L and JS-M participated in the design and performed of the study, wrote the manuscript and approval of the final version.
Funding
We want to express our gratitude to the Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, for the support provided for the development of this research. MR-R, RP-M, and AS-Á received support from the National System of Researchers Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT, MX). QT-S had a fellowship from CONACyT (CVU 366056, number 379699).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate the support in qPCR techniques received from D. Sc. Graciela Zambrano of the Molecular Odontology Laboratory of the Faculty of Odontology of the Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Juárez University of the State of Durango.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2020.00206/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Gallo M, Vigil-De Gracia P. Trastornos Hipertensivos del Embarazo. 1ª ed. España: Editorial AMOLCA (2013).
2. Sánchez E, Nava S, Morán C, Romero J, Cerbón M. Estado actual de la preeclampsia en México: De lo epidemiológico a sus mecanismos moleculares. Rev Invest Clin. (2010) 62:252–60.
3. Salvador J, Martínez Y, Lechuga A, Terrones A. Hipertensión inducida por el embarazo en Adolescentes: Un estudio multicéntrico. Ansiedad y Estrés. (2005) 11:181–4.
4. Harris A, Seckl J. Glucocorticoids, prenatal stress and the programming of disease. Horm Behav. (2011) 59:279:289. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.06.007
5. Sibai B, Dekker G, Kupferminc M. Preeclampsia. Lancet. (2005) 365:785–97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17987-2
6. Salvador J. La Dimensión biopsicosocial de la preeclampsia: Un abordaje conceptual empírico. Ginecol Obstet Mex. (2009) 77:231–7.
7. Salvador J, Martínez Y, Ramírez J, Aguilar M, Terrones A, Reyes M. Genesis of preeclampsia: an epidemiological approach. ISRN Obstetr Gynecol. (2012) 2012:916914. doi: 10.5402/2012/916914
8. Vianna P, Bauer M, Dornfeld D, Bogo J Distress conditions during pregnancy may lead to pre-eclampsia by increasing cortisol levels and altering lymphocyte sensitivity to glucocorticoids. Med Hypotheses. (2010) 77:188–91. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2011.04.007
9. Bertram C, Hanson M. Prenatal programming of posnatal endocrine responses by glucocorticoid. Reproduction. (2002) 124:459–67. doi: 10.1530/reprod/124.4.459
10. Choudhury M. Friedman JE. Epigenetics and microRNAs in preeclampsia. Clin Exp Hypertens. (2012) 34:334–34. doi: 10.3109/10641963.2011.649931
11. Hogg K, Blair J, McFadden D, Von Dadelszen P, Robinson W. Early Onset Pre-eclampsia is associated with altered DNA methylation of cortisol-signalling and steroidogenic genes in placenta. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e62969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062969
12. Dwi Putra SE, Reichetzeder C, Meixner M, Lieve K, Slowinski T, Hocher B. DNA methylation of the glucocorticoid receptor gene promoter in the placenta is associated with blood pressure regulation in human pregnancy. J Hypert. (2017) 35:2276–86. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001450
13. Thailaganathan B, Wormald B, Zanardini C, Sheldon J, Ralph E, Papageorghiou, et al. Early-Pregnancy multiple serum markers and second trimester uterine artery Doppler in predicting preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. (2010) 115:1233–8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181dd5137
14. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. (2013) 122:1122–31. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000437382.03963.88
15. Iranpur M, Esmailizadeh. Rapid Extraction of High Quality DNA from Whole Blood Stored at 4°C for Long Period. Kerman: Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman. (2010).
16. Périer R, Praz V, Junier T, Bonnard C, Bucher P. The Eukariotic Promoter Database (EPD). Nucleic Acids Res. (2000) 28:302-3. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.302
17. Budczies J, Klauschen F, Sinn BV, Gyorffy B, Schmitt WD, Darb-Esfahani S, et al. Cutoff finder: a comprehensive and straightforward web application enabling rapid biomarker cutoff optimization. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e51862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051862
18. IIona H, Dvorakova L, Kotlabova K, Kestlerova A, Hympanova L, Novotna V, et al. Assessment of placental and maternal stress responses in patients with pregnancy related complications via monitoring of heat shock protein mRNA levels. Mol Biol Rep. (2015) 42:625–37. doi: 10.1007/s11033-014-3808-z
19. Turner J, Muller C. Structure of the glucocorticoid receptor (NRC1) gene 5' untraslated region: identification, and tissue distribution of multiple new human exon 1. J Mol Endocrinol. (2005) 35:283.292. doi: 10.1677/jme.1.01822
20. Tyrka AR, Parade SH, Welch ES, Ridout KK, Price LH, Marsit C, et al. Methylation of the leukocyte glucocorticoid receptor gene promoter in adults: associations with early adversity and depressive, anxiety and substance-use disorders. Transl Psychiatry. (2016) 6:e848. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.112
21. Freyermuth G. Observatorio de Mortalidad Materna. pág web disponible en (2018). Available online at: http://www.omm.org.mx/index.php, visitado el 11/Abril/2018
22. Monk C, Tianshu F, Lee S, Krupska I, Champagne F, Tycko B. Distress during pregnancy: epigenetic regulation of placenta glucocorticoid-related genes and fetal neurobehavior. Am J Psychiatry. (2015) 173:705–13. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15091171
23. Veerbeek J, Hermes W, Breimer A, Rijn B, Koenen S, Mol Ben, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk factors after early-onset preeclampsia, late-onset preeclampsia, and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Hypertension. (2015) 65:600–6. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04850
Keywords: preeclampsia, pregnancy, methylation, cortisol, hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis
Citation: Torres-Salazar Q, Martínez-López Y, Reyes-Romero M, Pérez-Morales R, Sifuentes-Álvarez A and Salvador-Moysén J (2020) Differential Methylation in Promoter Regions of the Genes NR3C1 and HSP90AA1, Involved in the Regulation, and Bioavailability of Cortisol in Leukocytes of Women With Preeclampsia. Front. Med. 7:206. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00206
Received: 12 February 2020; Accepted: 27 April 2020;
Published: 16 June 2020.
Edited by:
Patricio López-Jaramillo, University of Santander (UDES), ColombiaReviewed by:
Fernando Lizcano, Universidad de La Sabana, ColombiaTanja Premru-Sršen, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia
Copyright © 2020 Torres-Salazar, Martínez-López, Reyes-Romero, Pérez-Morales, Sifuentes-Álvarez and Salvador-Moysén. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jaime Salvador-Moysén, jsmoysen@ujed.mx