Management of Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in Specialised and Non-specialised ILD Centres Around the World

Introduction

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic and progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease associated with a poor prognosis with a five-year survival rate of 20–40% and a median survival time of 2–5 years (1, 2). An acute exacerbation of IPF contributes to the dismal prognosis and disease progression and is defined as an acute, clinically significant respiratory deterioration characterised by evidence of new widespread alveolar abnormality in patients with IPF and after the exclusion of cardiac failure or fluid overload (3). The annual incidence is up to 20%, depending on the population analysed (4, 5). AE-IPF is associated with a median survival of ~3–4 months (6, 7) and may account for more than 40% of all death in patients with IPF (8). The aetiology is still obscure, but AE-IPF might be triggered e.g. by infection or procedures/operation, or may occur idiopathic (6). Evidence on prevention, diagnosis and therapy of AE-IPF is sparse and no international guidelines exist (3, 9). Accordingly, there is a huge variability with regards to preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches worldwide (10). It is unknown whether these different strategies are partially explainable by differences between specialised and non-specialised ILD centres. Therefore, this study aimed to compare preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for AE-IPF between specialised and non-specialised ILD centres.

Materials and Methods

Questionnaire and Participating Physicians

As described previously (10), as a first step we conducted a literature research on diagnostics, therapy, prevention and management of AE-IPF to identify items to be included in this survey. Then, an expert panel was created, comprising pulmonologists with expertise in the diagnosis and management of ILD working in specialist ILD centres and a track record of publication in this field, to participate in an email-based interview to structure the survey. The final questionnaire consisted of 20 questions regarding diagnosis, treatment and prevention of AE-IPF and suggested future perspectives in AE-IPF research (10). To identify working place (specialised and non-specialised ILD centres), country of origin, number of patients with IPF under care, and estimated number of AE-IPF seen, additional questions were included into this survey. From July 1 2017 to November 30 2017 pulmonologists worldwide with interest in ILD were identified, including the European Respiratory Society assembly on Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Disease, the American Thoracic Society assembly on Clinical Problems, the Japanese Respiratory Society assembly on Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Disease and participants of the IPF Project Consortium (www.theipfproject.com) (11). Nationality, academic status (working at a university hospital or not) or subspecialist interests within respiratory medicine did not influence inclusion eligibility. The questionnaire was provided by the online survey tool SurveyMonkey^® from December 2017 to April 2018.

Statistical Analysis

For questions with categorical answers, absolute and relative frequencies were calculated and chi-squared tests were used to assess differences between specialised and non-specialised ILD centres. For questions with answers on a continuous scale, median, first and third quartile, minimum and maximum were determined and differences between continents were assessed using Kruskal–Wallis tests. Due to the exploratory nature of this survey, all resulting p-values are solely to be interpreted descriptively and no adjustment for multiple testing was conducted. p-values smaller than 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant. All analyses were conducted using R v.3.4.2 (http://r-project.org).

Results

Participants

Overall, 509 pulmonologists from 66 countries responded. Three hundred and thirty four (65.9%) of the participants worked in a specialised ILD centre, 142 (28.0%) in non-specialised ILD centres i.e. in a general pulmonology department, 4 (0.8%) on an intensive care unit and 27 (5.3%) did not indicate their institution. Physicians working on an intensive care unit or who did not indicate their institution were excluded from the analysis. A total of 436 pulmonologists working in a specialised or non-specialised ILD centre were included in this analysis. On average 331 cases of AE-IPF were seen in specialised ILD centres and 139 in non-specialised ILD centres. Figure 1 shows the place of work (continent) of the respondents in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Number of participants in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres from different continents.

Diagnostic Procedures for AE-IPF

Most diagnostic tools, including multi-slice thin-section computer tomography without contrast media (HRCT), CT with contrast media in the absence of clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), echocardiography, assessment for pathogens, NT-proBNP/BNP, D-Dimer and troponins were used similarly between specialised and non-specialised ILD centres. The main difference was the sampling of sputum for microbiology (induced sputum) which was more frequent in non-specialised ILD centres (22 vs. 12%, p = 0.0106). Conversely, pathogen testing in urine was performed significantly more often in specialised ILD centres than in non-specialised ILD centres (42 vs. 28%, p = 0.0068). 50% of specialised ILD centres screened for RSV (respiratory syncytial virus), compared to only 33% in non-specialised ILD centres (p = 0.0024). The use of biomarker KL-6 was higher in non-specialised ILD centres than in specialised ILD centres (24 vs. 15%, p = 0.0313). The most relevant diagnostic procedures applied for AE-IPF are shown in Figure 2. Other diagnostic procedures such as laboratory parameters or specific pathogens are shown in Supplementary 1.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. The main diagnostic procedures applied for AE-IPF in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres. Statistically significant differences are labelled with a ^* (p-value = <0.05).

Treatment Approaches for AE-IPF

The majority of participating pulmonologists treated AE-IPF with methylprednisolone or equivalent with a dosage of 500–1,000 mg per day for 3 days followed by a slow tapering similarly in both types of institutions (63 vs. 66%).

Other immunosuppressive therapies such as cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide (i.v. bolus), tacrolimus and rituximab were rarely used in both specialised and non-specialised ILD centres, but cyclosporine was significantly more frequently used in non-specialised ILD centres (13 vs. 6%, p = 0.0288).

Other therapies such as polymyxin B hemoperfusion (7 vs. 10%), and plasmapheresis/plasma exchange (4 vs. 5%) were also less commonly used in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres. However, significantly more pulmonologists treated their patients with recombinant thrombomodulin in non-specialised ILD centres than in specialised ILD centres (15 vs. 8%, p = 0.0342).

Differences between institutions in the use of treatment strategies are shown in Figure 3. See also Supplementary 1.

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Different treatment strategies towards AE-IPF in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres. Statistically significant differences are labelled with a ^* (p-value = <0.05).

Antifibrotic Therapy Management During AE-IPF

In patients without antifibrotic therapy, the majority of the survey participants see a reason to initiate an antifibrotic therapy in the event of an AE-IPF in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres (66 vs. 69%).

The choice of the antifibrotic drug did also not differ significantly between specialised and non-specialised centres (nintedanib 20 vs. 20%, pirfenidone 11 vs. 19%, no preference for specific anti-fibrotic drug 35 vs. 28%).

For patients already on antifibrotic therapy at the time of AE-IPF, there was no significant difference in the approach: 80% of respondents in specialised ILD centres would continue and 5% would discontinue antifibrotic therapy, compared to 70% continuing (p = 0.0513) and 7% discontinuing therapy (p = 0.5491) in non-specialised ILD centres. The dose was reduced by 1 % in specialised ILD centres compared to 5% in non-specialised ILD centres (p = 0.0301), 9% would switch to the alternative antifibrotic therapy in specialist ILD centres and similarly 10% would switch in non-specialised ILD centres (p = 0.999).

Different strategies in this situation are also shown in Figure 4. For further strategies see Supplementary 1.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Different strategies in AE-IPF concerning an antifibrotic treatment in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres. Statistically significant differences are labelled with a ^* (p-value = <0.05).

Management of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) During AE-IPF

In the case of suspected PH on clinical investigations (e.g. echocardiography, BNP, clinical signs) during an AE-IPF, significantly more physicians in specialised ILD centres would start diuretic therapy than in non-specialised ILD centre (54 vs. 41%, p = 0.0210). Only a minority in both institutions would perform right heart catheterization in AE-IPF in suspected PH (6 vs. 7%). Seven percentage would start a PH specific treatment after an established PH diagnosis in a specialised ILD centre, significantly more (14%) would do so in a non-specialised ILD centre (p = 0.0494). Only 3% of physicians in a specialised ILD centre and 1% in a non-specialised centre would start a PH specific treatment without a confident diagnosis. After stabilisation of AE-IPF, more than 50% of physicians would evaluate a PH specific treatment by subsequently performing right heart catheterization (56 vs. 55%). A quarter of all participating pulmonologists in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres saw no indication for a PH treatment during or after AE-IPF (Supplementary 1).

Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and Palliative Care in AE-IPF

With regards to the care for critically ill patients with AE, there were no differences in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres for the use of high-flow oxygen (84 vs. 78%) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) (72 vs. 77%). 9% of specialised and 11% of non-specialised ILD centres use invasive ventilation for all critical ill patients, whereas 48 vs. 39% respectively would only use invasive ventilation in patients suitable for lung transplantation (LTX) as a bridge to LTX or in very selected cases.

Significantly more physicians in specialised ILD centres offered extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to patients suitable for LTX as a bridge to LTX than in non-specialised ILD centres (49 vs. 36%, p = 0.0287).

Palliative care was considered similarly in both types of institutions (65 vs. 62%).

Institutional differences in these approaches are shown in Figure 5 (Supplementary 1).

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Different management strategies in critically ill patients with AE-IPF in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres. Statistically significant differences are labelled with a ^* (p-value = <0.05).

Preventive Strategies for AE-IPF

Measures aimed at preventing the occurrence of AE-IPF was equal amongst specialised and non-specialised ILD centres and included vaccinations, antifibrotic therapy and pulmonary rehabilitation or other forms of structured exercise therapy. Antacid drugs were prescribed significantly more in non-specialised ILD centres than in specialised ILD centres (61 vs. 50%, p = 0.0438) in all IPF patients. Long-term azithromycin, low dose steroids (≤10 mg) and anticoagulation (to prevent AE-IPF) were only used by a minority in both types of institutions.

In terms of planned surgical procedures, significantly more physicians in specialised ILD centres favoured preventive anaesthetic measures such as low tidal volume and avoidance of hyperoxygenation compared to physicians in non-specialised ILD centres (72 vs. 61%, p=0.0368).

Institutional differences in preventive strategies are shown in Figure 6. See also Supplementary 1.

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. Different preventive strategies in AE-IPF in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres. Statistically significant differences are labelled with a ^* (p-value = <0.05).

Unmet Needs in AE-IPF

Pulmonologists in both specialised and non-specialised ILD centres advocate more intensive collaboration between different ILD specialists; improved education and training of physicians; education of patients and caregivers as well as enhanced research to improve the understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of AE-IPF. Physicians working in specialised ILD centres saw a stronger need for intensified research and projects on the treatment of AE-IPF (90 vs. 80%, p = 0.0101). There were more pulmonologists in non-specialised ILD centres who saw a need of improvement in multidisciplinary strategies for diagnosing and discussions than in specialised ILD centres (67 vs. 53%, p = 0.0088).

Discussion

Despite the fact that AE-IPF is one of the most common causes of death in IPF (3), evidence on prevention, additional diagnostic approaches besides HRCT and treatment of this complication is sparse and differs significantly worldwide (10). No particular evidence-based guidance exists. Here we report analyses on similarities and differences in the management of AE-IPF in specialised vs. non-specialised ILD centres. The strength of our report was the significant number of physicians who replied to our survey representing both specialised and non-specialised ILD centres.

Diagnostic procedures were almost identical in both specialised and non-specialised ILD centres, including radiology and screening for infections. Molyneaux et al. have showed that there is an increased bacterial load in the BAL of IPF patients with AE-IPF compared to stable IPF patients (12) suggesting a potential causative role in AE-IPF. There is evidence for the contribution of lung microbiota in disease progression and in acute exacerbation (13, 14). Microbiological confirmation may therefore play an important role in the diagnostic process and may be useful for future therapeutic and preventive strategies. The majority of physicians in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres screen for pathogens in sputum, deemed a safer method to screen for pathogens compared to bronchoscopy. A recent study supports this approach as a positive bronchoscopy only affected management in 13% of patients and resulted in a change of treatment in <5% (15). Furthermore, in the same study, a significant number of patients required intubation and transfer to the ICU with poor extubation success post bronchoscopy (15). Conversely, a study has demonstrated the feasibility and safety of performing BAL aided by NIV as a useful tool for differentiating or confirming triggered AE (16).

Furthermore, there is a similarity in therapeutic approaches. The majority of pulmonologists in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres use antibiotic therapy, namely broad-spectrum antibiotic combined with macrolide. High dose steroids are widely administered in non-specialised and specialised ILD centres in AE-IPF. High dose long-term steroid use was associated with an increased mortality in the PANTHER trial (17) and a history of previous immunosuppression before AE-IPF has a negative impact on mortality (18). Recently, a retrospective study with 82 AE-IPF patients showed that subjects receiving corticosteroids were more likely to require ICU level care and mechanical ventilation and therefore did not benefit from treatment with corticosteroids (19). However, future studies with larger cohorts are necessary to prove the deleterious effects of steroid therapy.

Other immunosuppressants and strategies are used less frequently. Very few pulmonologists never use immunosuppression for AE-IPF. Although there is only low evidence base for the use of more potent anti-inflammatory treatment approaches such as cyclosporine A, intravenous cyclophosphamide or tacrolimus (20–24), they are used by some pulmonologists in non-specialised and specialised ILD centres. A randomised, double-blinded clinical trial of cyclophosphamide in AE-IPF with 120 patients was completed and results are eagerly awaited (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02460588).

The international guidelines recommend avoiding ICU in patients with AE-IPF (weak recommendation) (25) because the mortality of patients with AE-IPF admitted to ICU, particularly in ventilated patients, is high (26). Some patients who do not respond to conventional oxygen therapy benefit from high flow oxygen (27). NIV may be a reasonable option for some critically ill patients (28). Trudzinski et al. showed that ECMO is only an option for patients who are suitable for LTX, as it conferred limited impact on the poor prognosis for those who were not LTX candidates (29). This might be a reason for pulmonologists in no matter what kind of institution to prefer NIV and high-flow oxygen in patients with AE-IPF. Data on this is however limited.

In non-specialised and specialised ILD centres prevention strategies towards AE-IPF were performed to the same extent. Vaccinations were most frequently used; although their use is recommended by the international guideline, there is a lack of evidence to support this recommendation (30).

The approach by physicians to utilise antifibrotic drugs as a form of preventive strategy is supported by recent data of controlled trials that suggest nintedanib may prolong the time to the first AE-IPF (31) and reduces mortality after AE-IPF (32). Pirfenidone reduces the risk for respiratory related hospitalisation in post-hoc analyses (33). Data proving a reduced frequency of AE-IPF with pirfenidone is sparse: In a Phase 2 trial of 107 patients Azuma et al. found a significant reduction of AE-IPF in patients using pirfenidone (34). A larger trial could not prove this (35).

While a Japanese study suggested a role for anticoagulants to prevent AE-IPF (Kubo et al.), a more recent study did not support this (36). This is in line with the results shown here: only a minority use anticoagulants to prevent AE-IPF. This is further supported by data suggesting a negative impact of anticoagulants on survival in IPF in general (37, 38).

Besides many similarities in the approach towards AE-IPF, there are also some differences in ILD specialised and non-specialised ILD centres.

PH is common in patients with IPF (39). Its prevalence at baseline means a higher risk for a subsequent AE-IPF, it is associated with a poorer overall survival but until now no specific PH treatment could show a benefit for IPF patients (40, 41). Significantly more pulmonologists in specialised ILD centres start diuretics compared to non-specialised ILD centres, and in line with the lack of benefits for specific PH treatment, most physicians do not use a specific PH treatment.

Many physicians use antacid drugs as a preventive strategy for AE-IPF, significantly more in non-specialised ILD centres. Lee et al. reported a higher pepsin level in the BAL of patients with AE-IPF compared to patients with stable disease (42) and a retrospective analysis showed a positive impact of antacid drugs on the course of IPF (43, 44). Other studies could not repeat this effect and suggested potentially higher rates of respiratory infections (45) and AE-IPF (46). The reason for the difference in the use of anti-acid drugs remains unclear, maybe because specialised ILD centres treat patients who are more ill or receive palliative treatment. Also different prescription rules in different countries or the fact that an old statement published by international societies from 2011 recommended their use (9) may be responsible.

Only a few pulmonologists use low dose steroids as a preventive strategy for AE-IPF, most of them in non-specialised ILD centres. This approach is in line with the international guideline where it is not recommended to use steroids beyond AE-IPF (17, 25). Furthermore, the use of corticosteroids has a negative effect on the outcome of IPF patients who received nintedanib (47).

Both pulmonologists in specialised and non-specialised ILD centres saw a high requirement for improved research strategies for AE-IPF. Significantly more non-specialised ILD centres saw the need for improvement in multidisciplinary strategies for diagnosing and discussion compared to pulmonologists in specialised ILD centres. Multidisciplinary team (MTD) meetings are widely used in the process of diagnostic and patient management (48) and they improve confidence in ILD diagnostics (49). MTD meetings are officially recommended (50). Arguably, MTD are more available in specialised ILD centres.

Many of the differences observed underscore the high and still unmet need for intensive research in AE-IPF. However, others might be associated with strategies applied outside current evidence. This demonstrates how important education in rare diseases and their complications is.

Our survey has some limitations: The survey was not designed for a data driven assessment of management practises but mainly to evaluate attitudes towards different aspects of AE-IPF. Participation was voluntarily and biased by involvement i.e. non-participating centres may have answered differently. Additionally, there was an imbalance between the number of specialised and non-specialised ILD institutions. Moreover, the number of ILD centres and patient numbers and thus experiences of diagnosis and management of AE-IPF may vary from country to country. Arguably, the number of IPF patients and cases of AE-IPF are higher in Japan as an example, than in other countries (51). Therefore, non-specialised ILD centres in Japan may have a higher number of patients to treat and thus greater experience than other non-specialised ILD centres elsewhere. More experienced physicians in the field of AE-IPF might have influenced the results of this questionnaire. Furthermore, the availability of treatments differs clearly between countries/continents, e.g., recombinant thrombomodelin is used almost exclusively in Asia and here by a quarter of all physicians (10). This might explain the fact that thrombomodulin is used more often in non-specialised ILD centres. The same applies for the use of KL-6 in the diagnostic process of AE-IPF. Finally, not all aspects of approaches to AE-IPF could be addressed in the questionnaire. The current COVID-19 pandemic was not part of the questionnaire because it was sent out before. This situation might have a huge impact on how AE-IPF is managed and this was not assed in the survey.

In conclusion, specialised and non-specialised ILD centres throughout the world do only differ in some aspects in the management of AE-IPF. Due to scant evidence and missing focused guidelines basic research and clinical trials have to be performed to establish optimal approaches to this deadly complication.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent from the participants was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.

Author Contributions

MP and MK contributed mainly to the conception and design of the study. MP wrote the first draft of the manuscript. JK performed the statistical analysis. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all participants who generously agreed to participate in this study.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.699644/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Ley B, Collard HR, King TE Jr. Clinical course and prediction of survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2011) 183:431–40. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201006-0894CI

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Kreuter M, Koegler H, Trampisch M, Geier S, Richeldi L. Differing severities of acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF): insights from the INPULSIS^® trials. Respir Res. (2019) 20:71. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1037-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Collard HR, Ryerson CJ, Corte TJ, Jenkins G, Kondoh Y, Lederer DJ, et al. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. an international working group report. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2016) 194:265–75. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0801CI

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Song JW, Hong SB, Lim CM, Koh Y, Kim DS. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: incidence, risk factors and outcome. Eur Respir J. (2011) 37:356–63. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00159709

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Clinical Research Network, Zisman DA, Schwarz M, Anstrom KJ, Collard HR, Flaherty KR, et al. A controlled trial of sildenafil in advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. (2010) 363:620–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Simon-Blancal V, Freynet O, Nunes H, Bouvry D, Naggara N, Brillet PY, et al. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: outcome and prognostic factors. Respiration. (2012) 83:28–35. doi: 10.1159/000329891

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Collard HR, Yow E, Richeldi L, Anstrom KJ, Glazer C. IPFnet investigators. Suspected acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis as an outcome measure in clinical trials. Respir Res. (2013) 14:73. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-73

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

8. Natsuizaka M, Chiba H, Kuronuma K, Otsuka M, Kudo K, Mori M, et al. Epidemiologic survey of Japanese patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and investigation of ethnic differences. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2014) 190:773–9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201403-0566OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, Martinez FJ, Behr J, Brown KK, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2011) 183:788–824. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2009-040GL

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kreuter M, Polke M, Walsh SLF, Krisam J, Collard HR, Chaudhuri N, et al. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: international survey and call for harmonisation. Eur Respir J. (2020) 55:1901760. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01760-2019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Walsh SLF, Maher TM, Kolb M, Poletti V, Nusser R, Richeldi L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an international case-cohort study. Eur Respir J. (2017) 50:1700936. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00936-2017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Molyneaux PL, Cox MJ, Wells AU, Kim HC, Ji W, Cookson WO, et al. Changes in the respiratory microbiome during acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res. (2017) 18:29. doi: 10.1186/s12931-017-0511-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. O'Dwyer DN, Ashley SL, Gurczynski SJ, Xia M, Wilke C, Falkowski NR, et al. Lung microbiota contribute to pulmonary inflammation and disease progression in pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2019) 199:1127–38. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201809-1650OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. D'Alessandro-Gabazza CN, Kobayashi T, Yasuma T, Toda M, Kim H, Fujimoto H, et al. A Staphylococcus pro-apoptotic peptide induces acute exacerbation of pulmonary fibrosis. Nat Commun. (2020) 11:1539. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15344-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Arcadu A, Moua T. Bronchoscopy assessment of acute respiratory failure in interstitial lung disease. Respirology. (2017) 22:352–9. doi: 10.1111/resp.12909

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Teramachi R, Kondoh Y, Kataoka K, Taniguchi H, Matsuda T, Kimura T, et al. Outcomes with newly proposed classification of acute respiratory deterioration in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Med. (2018) 143:147–52. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.09.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Clinical Research Network, Raghu G, Anstrom KJ, King TE Jr, Lasky JA, Martinez FJ. Prednisone, azathioprine, and N-acetylcysteine for pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. (2012) 366:1968–77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113354

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Papiris SA, Kagouridis K, Kolilekas L, Papaioannou AI, Roussou A, Triantafillidou C, et al. Survival in Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis acute exacerbations: the non-steroid approach. BMC Pulm Med. (2015) 15:162. doi: 10.1186/s12890-015-0146-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Farrand E, Vittinghoff E, Ley B, Butte AJ, Collard HR. Corticosteroid use is not associated with improved outcomes in acute exacerbation of IPF. Respirology. (2020) 25:629–35. doi: 10.1111/resp.13753

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Sakamoto S, Homma S, Miyamoto A, Kurosaki A, Fujii T, Yoshimura K. Cyclosporin A in the treatment of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Intern Med. (2010) 49:109–15. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.49.2359

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Novelli L, Ruggiero R, De Giacomi F, Biffi A, Faverio P, Bilucaglia L, et al. Corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a single center experience and literature review. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. (2016) 33:385–91.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

22. Horita N, Akahane M, Okada Y, Kobayashi Y, Arai T, Amano I, et al. Tacrolimus and steroid treatment for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Intern Med. (2011) 50:189–95. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.50.4327

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Donahoe M, Valentine VG, Chien N, Gibson KF, Raval JS, Saul M, et al. Autoantibody-targeted treatments for acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0127771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127771

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kolb M, Kirschner J, Riedel W, Wirtz H, Schmidt M. Cyclophosphamide pulse therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J. (1998) 12:1409–14. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.12061409

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Raghu G, Rochwerg B, Zhang Y, Garcia CA, Azuma A, Behr J, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline: treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An update of the 2011 clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2015) 192:e3–19. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201506-1063ST

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Rangappa P, Moran JL. Outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Crit Care Resusc. (2009) 11:102–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

27. Vianello A, Arcaro G, Molena B, Turato C, Braccioni F, Paladini L, et al. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy to treat acute respiratory failure in patients with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ther Adv Respir Dis. (2019) 13:1753466619847130. doi: 10.1177/1753466619847130

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Yokoyama T, Kondoh Y, Taniguchi H, Kataoka K, Kato K, Nishiyama O, et al. Noninvasive ventilation in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Intern Med. (2010) 49:1509–14. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.49.3222

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Trudzinski FC, Kaestner F, Schäfers HJ, Fähndrich S, Seiler F, Böhmer P, et al. Outcome of patients with interstitial lung disease treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2016) 193:527–33. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201508-1701OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Cottin V, Crestani B, Valeyre D, Wallaert B, Cadranel J, Dalphin JC, et al. Diagnosis and management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: French practical guidelines. Eur Respir Rev. (2014) 23:193–214. doi: 10.1183/09059180.00001814

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Richeldi L, du Bois RM, Raghu G, Azuma A, Brown KK, Costabel U, et al. Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. (2014) 370:2071–82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402584

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Collard HR, Richeldi L, Kim DS, Taniguchi H, Tschoepe I, Luisetti M, et al. Acute exacerbations in the INPULSIS trials of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J. (2017) 49:1601339. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01339-2016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Ley B, Swigris J, Day BM, Stauffer JL, Raimundo K, Chou W, et al. Pirfenidone reduces respiratory-related hospitalizations in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2017) 196:756–61. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201701-0091OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Azuma A, Nukiwa T, Tsuboi E, Suga M, Abe S, Nakata K, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2005) 171:1040–7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200404-571OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Taniguchi H, Ebina M, Kondoh Y, Ogura T, Azuma A, Suga M, et al. Pirfenidone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J. (2010) 35:821–9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00005209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Kreuter M, Wijsenbeek MS, Vasakova M, Spagnolo P, Kolb M, Costabel U, et al. Unfavourable effects of medically indicated oral anticoagulants on survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: methodological concerns. Eur Respir J. (2016) 48:1524–6. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01482-2016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Noth I, Anstrom KJ, Calvert SB, de Andrade J, Flaherty KR, Glazer C, et al. A placebo-controlled randomized trial of warfarin in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2012) 186:88–95. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201202-0314OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. King CS, Freiheit E, Brown AW, Shlobin OA, Aryal S, Ahmad K, et al. Association between anticoagulation and survival in interstitial lung disease: an analysis of the pulmonary fibrosis foundation patient registry. Chest. (2020) 3692:34911–4. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Nathan SD, Shlobin OA, Ahmad S, Urbanek S, Barnett SD. Pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary function testing in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. (2007) 131:657–63. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2485

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Judge EP, Fabre A, Adamali HI, Egan JJ. Acute exacerbations and pulmonary hypertension in advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J. (2012) 40:93–100. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00115511

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Cano-Jiménez E, Hernández González F, Peloche GB. Comorbidities and Complications in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Med Sci (Basel). (2018) 6:71. doi: 10.3390/medsci6030071

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Lee JS, Song JW, Wolters PJ, Elicker BM, King TE Jr, Kim DS, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage pepsin in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J. (2012) 39:352–8. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00050911

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Lee JS, Ryu JH, Elicker BM, Lydell CP, Jones KD, Wolters PJ, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux therapy is associated with longer survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2011) 184:1390–4. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201101-0138OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Lee JS, Collard HR, Anstrom KJ, Martinez FJ, Noth I, Roberts RS, et al. Anti-acid treatment and disease progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an analysis of data from three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med. (2013) 1:369–76. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70105-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Kreuter M, Wuyts W, Renzoni E, Koschel D, Maher TM, Kolb M, et al. Antacid therapy and disease outcomes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a pooled analysis. Lancet Respir Med. (2016) 4:381–9. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)00067-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Costabel U, Behr J, Crestani B, Stansen W, Schlenker-Herceg R, Stowasser S, et al. Anti-acid therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: insights from the INPULSIS^® trials. Respir Res. (2018) 19:167. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0866-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Cottin V LH, Luppi F, Le Maulf F, Schlenker-Herceg R, Stowasser S, Du Bois RM. Effect of baseline corticosteroid medication on reduction in FVC decline with nintedanib. Eur Respir J. (2015) 46:OA4498. doi: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2015.OA4498

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Richeldi L, Launders N, Martinez F, Walsh SLF, Myers J, Wang B, et al. The characterisation of interstitial lung disease multidisciplinary team meetings: a global study. ERJ Open Res. (2019) 5:00209–2018. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00209-2018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Walsh SLF, Wells AU, Desai SR, Poletti V, Piciucchi S, Dubini A, et al. Multicentre evaluation of multidisciplinary team meeting agreement on diagnosis in diffuse parenchymal lung disease: a case-cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. (2016) 4:557–65. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30033-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Myers JL, Richeldi L, Ryerson CJ, Lederer DJ, et al. Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2018) 198:e44–e68. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201807-1255ST

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Saito S, Lasky JA, Hagiwara K, Kondoh Y. Ethnic differences in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: The Japanese perspective. Respir Investig. (2018) 56:375–83. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2018.06.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar