ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med., 28 April 2025

Sec. Gastroenterology

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1586270

Gender and age differences in the global burden of peptic ulcers: an analysis based on GBD data from 1990 to 2021

Ruirui Tan&#x;Ruirui Tan1Dan Zhao&#x;Dan Zhao1Xiaomei ZhangXiaomei Zhang1Tong LiuTong Liu2Chao HanChao Han3Zhongcheng LiZhongcheng Li3Chenxi QiChenxi Qi4Zhaohui Wang
Zhaohui Wang3*
  • 1College of Acupuncture and Massage, Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China
  • 2Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Shenzhen Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shenzhen, China
  • 3Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Shenzhen Bao’an Authentic TCM Therapy Hospital, Shenzhen, China
  • 4Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, China

Background: Peptic ulcer (PU) is one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases worldwide. With advances in medical technology, the global disease burden of PU has been effectively controlled. However, the most recent evidence regarding the global burden of PU remains limited.

Methods: Using publicly available data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study from 1990 to 2021, we analyzed the characteristics of the global burden of PU, including trends in incidence, prevalence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), years lived with disability (YLDs), and years of life lost (YLLs). We employed Joinpoint regression, age-period-cohort (APC) analysis, decomposition analysis, and autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) modeling to evaluate changes and influencing factors for each indicator.

Results: The global number of PU cases increased from 2,570,413 in 1990 (95% CI: 2,161,831–2,997,880) to 2,854,370 in 2021 (95% CI: 2,438,231–3,264,252), representing a cumulative growth of 11.05%. However, the age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) decreased from 57.14 (95% CI: 48.61–66.73) per 100,000 population in 1990 to 34.10 (95% CI: 29.13–38.97) per 100,000 population in 2021. The global number of deaths due to PU decreased from 273,872 in 1990 (95% CI: 247,312–299,718) to 230,217 in 2021 (95% CI: 193,005–270,858). Significant gender differences were observed, with the disease burden consistently higher in males than in females. After controlling for period and cohort effects, the onset of PU tended to occur at younger ages, and the number of cases declined across most age groups from 1990 to 2021. The highest incidence of PU was concentrated in individuals aged 90 years and older. In terms of future trends, the global incidence of PU is projected to continue decreasing over the next 15 years. The global prevalence is expected to improve, while PU-related mortality is likely to plateau without significant increases or decreases.

Conclusion: The global burden of PU has declined significantly over the past three decades. However, elderly individuals and males remain at higher risk and require continued attention in prevention and management efforts.

1 Introduction

Peptic ulcers (PUs) are usually located in the stomach or proximal duodenum but can also be found in the esophagus or Meckel’s diverticulum (1). Globally, approximately 5–10% of individuals will develop a peptic ulcer, with an annual incidence estimated at 0.3–1.9% (2). The condition is caused due to an imbalance between the protective mechanisms and the corrosive effects of gastric acid and pepsin (1). Dysfunction of mucosal defense, coupled with hyperacidity, leads to progressive erosion, ranging from superficial damage to deep ulceration (3). In severe cases, complications such as bleeding, perforation, pyloric obstruction, and even malignancy may occur, significantly impairing patients’ quality of life.

Current treatment strategies for peptic ulcers primarily involve acid-suppressing medications and antimicrobial therapy (4). However, the increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and the growing use of antithrombotic agents in aging populations have added complexity to disease management. The global prevalence of peptic ulcer ranges from 0.12 to 1.5% (3), with estimates in Western populations ranging from 5 to 10% (1). Mortality rates have declined among individuals born in the 20th century compared to those born in the 19th century, as indicated by various epidemiological surveys (57). In the United States, hospital admissions related to peptic ulcers decreased by 25.8% between 2005 and 2014, with in-hospital mortality rates declining by 2.4% over the same period (8). A similar downward trend has been observed in Asian populations over the past two decades, suggesting a birth cohort effect in peptic ulcer epidemiology (7).

With increasing global awareness of health and safety, risk factors, disease burden, and advancements in therapeutic technologies are shaping the epidemiological patterns of peptic ulcer. However, monitoring long-term trends in the global burden of the disease remains a challenge due to geographical disparities and the lack of comprehensive global analyses (9). The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors (GBD) study has recently updated its dataset to 2021, incorporating revised estimates across the entire time series and including health statistics from over 200 countries (10). While the GBD primarily provides macro-level assessments of disease epidemiology, a more detailed analysis of peptic ulcer trends is necessary (11).

In this context, the present study examines the global burden of peptic ulcer disease from 1990 to 2021, encompassing prevalence, morbidity, mortality, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), years of life lost (YLLs), and years lived with disability (YLDs). Additionally, it explores age-specific patterns, gender differences, and temporal trends to provide critical statistical insights for optimizing health policies, healthcare resource allocation, and patient management strategies.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study population

The data used in this study were derived from the GBD database, which was constructed from 46,749 cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, civil surveys, and other research sources. The GBD 2021 report presents data on incidence, prevalence, and mortality rates for 369 diseases and injuries across 204 countries and regions. The present study evaluates global data on the incidence, prevalence, mortality, and DALYs of PU patients from 1990 to 2021. The data were analyzed across different age groups, genders, years, and regions. The DALYs include YLLs, representing the number of years of life lost due to premature mortality, and YLDs, representing the number of years of life lived with disability.

2.2 Data collection

In this study, data were obtained from the Global Health Data Exchange Outcomes Tool1, which was used to extract disease-related data variables, including 95% confidence intervals, and to analyze the burden of disease across both age-standardized and age-specific rates.

The primary standardization tools employed in this study were Bayesian meta-regression (Dis Mod-MR), spatio-temporal Gaussian process regression (ST-GPR), and autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models. Dis Mod-MR is a Bayesian meta-regression tool that evaluates all available data on the incidence, prevalence, and mortality of a disease, thereby enhancing consistency between epidemiological parameters.

ST-GPR is used to analyze spatio-temporal data, while the ARIMA model is a classical statistical model used for time series data forecasting to predict future trends in disease incidence, prevalence, and mortality. As GBD data are globally publicly available, no ethics committee approval was required for this study. Furthermore, this study adhered to the standards set forth for accurate and transparent health assessment reports.

2.3 Statistical analyses

The incidence, prevalence, mortality, DALYs, YLDs, and YLLs of global PUs were extracted from the GBD database, along with their corresponding age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR), age-standardized prevalence rates (ASPR), and age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR). Furthermore, the dataset includes age-standardized DALY rates (ASDR), age-standardized YLD rates, and age-standardized YLL rates.

To determine trends in disease burden, the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using the Joinpoint software (National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America). Model optimization was conducted using permutation tests with a significance level (alpha) set at 0.05 and 4,499 permutations. The significance of joinpoints was tested using this threshold. The number of joinpoints was set to range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 5, and the program determined the optimal number of joinpoints for the model. The model was calculated by estimating the pattern of change in incidence using the least squares method, which avoids the non-objectivity of typical trend analyses based on linear trends. Additionally, the sum of the squares of the residuals between the estimated and actual values was calculated, which yielded the turning point of the moving trend (12). The mean annual percentage change (AAPC) was calculated as 100 × (exp (β) - 1), with 95% CI also calculated from the model. If AAPC > 0, the age-standardized metrics demonstrated an increasing trend; if AAPC < 0, a decreasing trend was indicated; and if AAPC = 0, a more stable trend was suggested. To evaluate temporal trends in PU burden, regression analyses were employed. In particular, the regression curves were transformed into the natural logarithm of the age-standardized rate (ASR) using the following equation: y = a + bx + £, where y represents the natural logarithm of the ASR, x denotes the calendar year, and £ represents the error term. To fit age-standardized indicators to the regression model, the following equation is used: ln (y) = α + βx + ε, where y represents the corresponding age-standardized indicator and x represents the calendar year. All rates are reported as mean estimates per 100,000 population, which are determined by ranking the 25th and 75th values in the ranked 1,000 draws (13).

To examine the effects of age, period, and cohort on health outcomes, the study employed the use of age-period-cohort (APC) modeling (14). The term ‘age effect’ refers to the risk of an outcome occurring at different ages. The period effect represents the impact of temporal changes on outcomes observed across all age groups. Cohort effects pertain to changes in outcomes experienced by individuals from the same birth cohort (15). The APC model was fitted using the Epi package (version 2.46) in R (version 4.2.0)2. The residual deviations between the models and the AIC were compared to determine the optimal model. A decomposition analysis was employed to ascertain the influence of each factor (three cohort-level determinants: population aging, population growth, and epidemiological change) on the overall change (1618).

The ARIMA model comprises an autoregressive model (AR) and a moving average (MA) model. The fundamental tenets of the ARIMA model are that the data series are time-dependent random variables and that the autocorrelation can be characterized by the ARIMA model. Furthermore, the model posits that future values can be predicted based on past values. The equation is expressed as Yt = φ1Yt-1 + φ2Yt-2 +…φpYt–p + et1et-1-…-θq et-q (19), where (φ1Yt-1 + φ2Yt-2 +…φpYt + et) is the AR model part, et1et-1-…-θq et-q is the MA model part, Yt–p is the observed value at the period of (t-p), p and q represent the model order of AR and MA, and et is the random error at the period of t. In the ARIMA modeling process, differencing is first applied to stabilize the time series. The auto.arima () function is then used to select the optimal model based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) (20). To assess the residuals, we employ residual plots, autocorrelation function (ACF) plots, and residual Q-Q plots to check for normality. Finally, the Ljung-Box test is conducted to determine whether the residuals constitute white noise.

The data from this study were subjected to statistical analysis and visualization using the R statistical software program (version 4.4.1) and the Joinpoint software program (version 5.2.0). A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

3 Results

3.1 Descriptive analysis of PU burden globally

3.1.1 Incidence of PU globally

The global number of PU cases increased from 2,570,413 in 1990 (95% CI: 2161831–2,997,880) to 2,854,370 in 2021 (95% CI: 2,438,231–3,264,252), representing a cumulative growth of 11.05%. However, the ASIR globally decreased from 57.14 (95% CI:48.61–66.73) per 100,000 population in 1990 to 34.10 (95% CI:29.13–38.97) per 100,000 population in 2021. Meanwhile, the AAPC of the global incidence rate decreased by 1.65% (95% CI: 1.69–1.61) from 1990 to 2021 (Table 1). According to gender analysis, from 1990 to 2021, the number of incidence cases in men and the ASIR per 100,000 population both declined but remained higher in women (Table 2).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. All-age cases and age-standardized incidence, prevalence, deaths, DALYs, YLDs, and YLLs rates of PU in globally in 1990 and 2021 by total.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. All-age cases and age-standardized incidence, prevalence, mortality, DALYs, YLDs, and YLLs rates of PU in globally in 1990 and 2021 by gender.

3.1.2 Prevalence of PU globally

In terms of prevalence, the number of PU cases increased from 603,811,2 in 1990 (95% CI: 5,268,704–7,064,284) to 6,567,782 in 2021 (95% CI: 5,798,379–7,597,596), representing a cumulative growth of 8.77%. However, the ASPR decreased from 132.97 (95%CI: 116.22–154.17) per 100,000 population in 1990 to 78.27 (95%CI: 69.02–90.76) per 100,000 population in 2021. The AAPC of the mortality rate globally decreased by 1.69% (95% CI: 1.74–1.63) from 1990 to 2021 (Table 1). According to gender analysis, from 1990 to 2021, the number of prevalence cases in men and the ASPR per 100,000 population both declined but remained higher in women (Table 2).

3.1.3 Mortality of PUs globally

The number of PU cases globally has decreased from 273,872 in 1990 (95% CI: 247,312–299,718) to 230,217 in 2021 (95% CI: 193,005–270,858). The age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) decreased from 7.14 (95% CI: 6.41–7.82) per 100,000 population in 1990 to 2.75 (95% CI: 2.31–3.24) per 100,000 population in 2021. The AAPC of the mortality rate globally decreased by 3.02% (95% CI: 3.13–2.91) from 1990 to 2021 (Table 1). According to gender analysis, from 1990 to 2021, the number of mortality cases in men and the ASMR per 100,000 population both declined but remained higher in women (Table 2).

3.1.4 DALYs of PUs globally

In terms of DALYs (including YLDs and YLLs), the number of PU cases decreased from 8,394,780 in 1990 (95% CI: 7,603,519–9,210,479) to 6,057,594 in 2021 (95% CI: 5,162,099–7,041,854), representing a cumulative decrease of 27.84%. However, the ASDR decreased from 193.82 (95%CI: 175.79–212.14) per 100,000 population in 1990 to 71.56 (95%CI: 61.07–83.05) per 100,000 population in 2021. The AAPC of the DALYs rate globally decreased by 3.17% (95% CI: 3.24–3.10) from 1990 to 2021 (Table 1). According to gender analysis, from 1990 to 2021, the number of DALYs cases in men and the ASDR per 100,000 population both declined but remained higher in women (Table 2).

3.2 Joinpoint regression analysis of PU burden globally

The Joinpoint regression analysis of ASIR, ASPR, ASMR, and DALYs for PU worldwide from 1990 to 2021 is shown in Figure 1. From 1990 to 2018, the ASIR and ASPR showed a significant downward trend globally, while the trend from 2018 to 2021 remained stable. There was no statistically significant difference in APC (p > 0.05), as shown in Figures 1a,b. From 1990 to 2021, both ASMR and ASDR globally showed a downward trend, and APC had significant statistical significance (p < 0.05), as shown in Figures 1c,d.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. The APC of ASIR, ASPR, ASMR, and ASDR of PU in Global from 1990 to 2021 (*means p-values<0.05 and significant results). (a) ASIR; (b) ASPR; (c) ASMR; (d) ASDR.

3.3 Trends in the burden of PU disease globally

The ASDR and YLLs of PU worldwide have gradually decreased from 1990 to 2021. However, the ASIR, ASPR, ASMR, and YSLs of PU have shown a steady trend, as illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Trend comparison of ASIR, ASMR, ASPR, DALYs, YLDs and YLLs of PU in Global from 1990 to 2021.

3.4 Impact of age-period-cohort on the incidence of PU globally

The time period was divided into 5-year intervals: 1992, 1997, 2002, 2007, 2012, and 2017. Globally, PU was first observed in individuals at the age of 20 years. Over time, the global cohort of individuals with PU showed an upward trend until death, as shown in Figure 3a. After controlling for period and cohort, the onset of PU tended to be younger, and the number of cases decreased in different age groups between 1990 and 2021, as shown in Figure 3b. Globally, the highest number of PU incidence was concentrated in the age group of 90 years and above; over time, the decreasing trend of PU incidence tended to stabilize after 2012 (refer Figure 3c). The results of changes in incidence rates according to age-specific cohorts show that the number of people with incidence rates in each age group has declined over time, as shown in Figure 3d.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Incidence rates of PU in Global. (a) The age-specific incidences rates of PU according to time periods, each line connects the age-specific incidence for a 5-year period. (b) The age-specific incidences rates of PU according to birth cohort, each line connects the age-specific incidence for a 5-year cohort. (c) The period-specific incidence rates of PU according to age groups, each line connects the birth cohort-specific incidence for a 5-year age group. (d) The birth cohort-specific incidence rates of PU according to age groups, each line connects the birth cohort-specific incidence for a 5-year age group.

3.5 Decomposition analysis of PU burden

Decomposition analyses showed that aging played a significant role in the PU incidence of men globally (52.75%). Epidemiological changes contributed the most to the global PU DALYs of women globally (504.3%); population growth contributed significantly to global PU incidence,with percentages of 4285.53% (male), -1622.89% (female), and 1114.37% (both sexes combined). The impact of epidemiological changes on global PU incidence was 1670.14% in men and 301.54% in DALYs. Epidemiological changes are the main drivers of changes in PU incidence and DALYs indicators (Supplementary Table 1; Figure 4).

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Decomposition analysis of PU indicators from 1990 to 2021. (a) Incidence of Global (b) DALYs of Global. Black dots represent the overall changes in population growth, aging, and epidemiological changes.

3.6 Projections of PU incidence, prevalence, and mortality for the next 15 years

The ARIMA model was used to quantitatively describe trends in PU incidence, prevalence, and mortality over the next 15 years. We projected the age-specific burden of PU for the global population. In terms of incidence, the global population of PU is likely to continue decreasing over the next 15 years. The prevalence of PU will improve globally, and the mortality rate for PU will level off over the next 15 years, showing no significant rise or fall, as shown in Figures 5ac. The optimized model selection for PU incidence was ARIMA (0,2,1), with an AIC value of −55.8 after filtering using the auto.arima () function. Comprehensive diagnostics confirmed that the residuals of the ARIMA (0,2,1) model met the white noise criteria (Ljung-Box Q* = 9.206, df = 5, p = 0.101), and no obvious model specification errors were observed in the diagnostic plots (Supplementary Figures 1, 2). Therefore, the model was deemed suitable for predictive analysis. Following the same procedure, we developed the ARIMA (0,2,1) model for PU prevalence (AIC = 9.29), with the Ljung-Box test also confirming its robustness (χ2 = 12.46, p = 0.256). Similarly, the ARIMA (1,1,0) model was selected for PU mortality (AIC = 86.09), and the Ljung-Box test further validated its robustness (χ2 = 6.002, df = 10, p = 0.815). The AIC, BIC, and AICC values of the model (Supplementary Table 2) indicate that the model strikes a good balance between complexity and fitting effectiveness with moderate complexity, making it a candidate model worthy of consideration, while the correlation coefficients of the model and the training set error measurements further validate the reliability of its predictive ability (20, 21).

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Predicted trends of PU incidence prevalence and death rate in global over the next 15 years (2022–2036). Red lines represent the true trend of PU incidence prevalence and death rate during 1990–2021; yellow dot lines and shaded regions represent the predicted trend and its 95% CI. (a) ASIR of Global; (b) ASMR of Global; (c) ASPR of Global.

4 Discussion

This study comprehensively assessed the global disease burden and its spatial and temporal trends of PU globally over the past three decades, based on the latest updated GBD 2024 database. It also compared the differences in data by age and gender between 1990 and 2021. The results showed that the global disease burden of PU has significantly decreased, which is consistent with previous findings that the global age-standardized incidence, prevalence, DALYs, and death rates of PU exhibited a decreasing trend. Meanwhile, the number of prevalent cases and the age-standardized prevalence rate were higher in men than in women in all years from 1990 to 2019; the difference between the two groups decreased over time (11).

However, this study has made new and different discoveries. After controlling for period and cohort effects, the onset of PU tended at younger ages, and the number of cases decreased across different age groups between 1990 and 2021. The highest number of PU incidence was concentrated in the age group of 90 years and above. PU appeared at the age of 20 years; the global cohort of individuals with PU was in an upward direction over time until death. The decomposition analysis results of this study indicate that aging played a significant role in the global PU incidence among men (52.75%). In contrast, epidemiological changes were the main contributors to global PU DALYs among women (504.3%). Overall, epidemiological changes emerged as the main drivers of changes in PU incidence and DALYs indicators.

Over the past three decades, the global disease burden of PU has been effectively controlled with the improvement of the global economic standard of living, the spread of people’s awareness of healthcare, and the continuous development of new diagnostic and treatment technologies. The decline in Age-Standardized Incidence Rate and Age-Standardized Prevalence Rate can be attributed to better hygiene, healthier lifestyles, and improved dietary habits. These factors have reduced key risk factors, such as Helicobacter pylori infection, which impairs mucosal defense mechanisms (22), thereby contributing to effective disease prevention. In addition, the development of acid-suppressing drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors (23), histamine-2 receptor antagonists (24), Vonoprazan (25), and cellular agents (26), and the advancement of new diagnostic and therapeutic technologies, such as fecal antigen detection (27), endoscopy (28), and adipose mesenchymal stem cells (29), have improved the healthcare management system for PU, enhanced the quality of healthcare services, and improved the prognostic efficacy for patients with PU, thus reducing the ASMR and ASDR of PU patients.

Nevertheless, we must consider the potential threat of global disruptions, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, to the improving trend of PU. For instance, the strain on healthcare resources during the pandemic may have affected the detection and eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection, while delays in diagnosis and treatment could have prolonged the disease course or increased complications of PU. Additionally, lifestyle changes during the pandemic, such as shifts in dietary patterns and fluctuations in psychological stress, may have influenced the incidence and prevalence of PU. Recent research evidence indicates that during the pandemic, hospital admissions and mortality rates for peptic ulcer bleeding decreased by approximately 36.6%, while hospital admissions for peptic ulcer perforation dropped by one-seventh. However, mortality rates significantly increased during the pandemic (30). Moreover, in the long term, a significant association has been observed between COVID-19 and an increased risk of gastrointestinal diseases. Even among non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, the risk of various gastrointestinal disorders, including PU, remains evident, with the risk increasing progressively with the severity of COVID-19 (31). The mechanisms underlying this association remain unclear, but several possibilities have been proposed. One potential explanation is the fecal-oral transmission of the virus, leading to gastrointestinal infection (32). Additionally, interactions between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and the expression of the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor in the digestive tract may contribute to the progression of digestive diseases in COVID-19 patients (33). The detection of SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid (RNA) and intracellular staining of viral nucleocapsid protein in gastric and duodenal epithelium further suggest that these gastrointestinal glandular epithelial cells are infected by SARS-CoV-2 (34). Another possible mechanism involves the significant elevation of inflammatory markers and cytokines, including interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) (35), which play a role in the infiltration of immune cells in the gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, future research should integrate longitudinal data and causal inference methods to quantify the long-term impact of COVID-19 on the burden of PU and explore potential intervention strategies to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the consequences of this global public health event.

Population aging is a major factor influencing the global burden of PU disease. Declining fertility and increasing life expectancy have led to an annual increase in the proportion of older people and an inverted pyramid shift in the demographic structure of society (36, 37). As far as we currently know, the biological mechanisms of PU involve a multifactorial interplay, including an imbalance between mucosal defense and aggressive factors, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (1). In older adults, the risk of ulcer development is increased due to diminished mucosal repair capacity, reduced gastric mucus secretion, and decreased gastric blood flow, combined with a greater susceptibility to the widespread use of NSAIDs (38). Additionally, due to the very different levels of sex hormones in men and women, estrogen can regulate the secretion of basal acid and duodenal bicarbonate and enhance the mucosal barrier function of the gastrointestinal tract by increasing the permeability of epithelial cells and clearing the expression of Erβ mRNA in the nucleus (39). Moreover, gender-related differences in lifestyle habits may play an important role in the development of the disease. The differences in lifestyle habits associated with gender are also important factors influencing disease progression (40). Smoking, alcohol consumption, lack of exercise, and unhealthy diets are all lifestyle habits driven by men’s roles in today’s society (40). Therefore, men are expected to be at a greater risk for PU, which also increases the accuracy and credibility of the results of the present study in predicting the future development of PU.

Therefore, in response to the current risk trends in the disease burden of peptic ulcer, it is necessary for each country and region to take effective countermeasures to control the deterioration of the situation in the future. In particular, as population aging is a globally recognized social problem, it is important to reduce the negative impact of the disease burden by popularizing health knowledge and healthy lifestyles, strengthening health education and awareness of preventive healthcare for the elderly, developing geriatric medical and rehabilitation care services, and improving social security and elderly care systems, thus helping the elderly to have access to a wider range of healthcare services. In addition, the media, educational institutions, and community activities have been used to enhance health knowledge about digestive diseases among men, raise men’s awareness of the dangers of unhealthy lifestyle habits, and formulate and restrict policies to regulate the promotion of cigarettes and alcohol, thereby reducing the threat posed by harmful products to men’s health. In view of the occupational health risks men may face during work, strengthening their occupational health supervision and providing appropriate health examinations and preventive measures can help improve their unhealthy living habits and enhance their overall health.

4.1 Strengths and limitations

To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first comprehensive analysis of the global burden of peptic ulcer disease (PU) from 1990 to 2021, using the latest survey data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study. Additionally, it explores variations in disease burden among PU patients globally based on age and gender. The findings of this study not only provide valuable data to support the global healthcare system but also contribute to the rational allocation of healthcare resources and the advancement of public health management. However, several limitations must be acknowledged. First, the accuracy of our results depends on the quality of the data updated by the GBD in 2021, as well as the completeness, accuracy, and reliability of the standardized models used to optimize these data. Since the GBD study is part of a large international collaborative effort to quantify global health trends, it relies heavily on survey data provided by individual countries (e.g., differences in population structure, unequal distribution of medical resources, and variations in reporting standards across countries), which may be subject to collection and reporting biases. Second, the impact of COVID-19 on PU has not been fully accounted for in this study, potentially leading to an incomplete risk assessment. Future research should incorporate more comprehensive evaluations of the pandemic’s influence on PU incidence, prevalence, and disease burden. Finally, this study focuses only on global prevalence, and more comprehensive research is needed to investigate specific trends in different regions or countries. Additionally, this study did not explore the epidemiological patterns of different types of peptic ulcers. Future research may need to incorporate more granular data sources to further investigate the potential differences between gastric ulcers and duodenal ulcers.

5 Conclusion

The global disease burden of PU has declined significantly, with age-standardized incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life expectancy all being significantly controlled. However, varying trends persist due to the effects of population aging and gender differences. These findings are consistent with the projections of PU trends over the next 15 years in this study. Therefore, timely monitoring of disease prevalence and trend prediction is an important part of disease prevention and control. It is hoped that the results of this study will help explore the characteristics of different disease distribution trends in the future and help local governments formulate better and more detailed policies and interventions according to the characteristics of the diseases.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

RT: Writing – original draft. DZ: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. XZ: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. TL: Writing – review & editing. CH: Writing – review & editing. ZL: Writing – review & editing. CQ: Writing – review & editing. ZW: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81774393), the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (20210101191JC), the Project of Guangdong Provincial Bureau of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No. 202305100917159500), the Natural Science Foundation of Shenzhen City of China (No. JCYJ20220530162617039), the Acupuncture and moxibustion Research Project of Shenzhen Bao’an TCM Development Foundation of China (No. 2022KJCX-ZJZL-3), and Shenzhen Bao’ an District TCM clinical research project (No. 2023ZYYLCZX-8).

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the GBD 2021 collaborators whose outstanding contributions have made it possible to complete this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1586270/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

References

1. Lanas, A, and Chan, FKL. Peptic ulcer disease. Lancet. (2017) 390:613–24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32404-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Laucirica, I, García Iglesias, P, and Calvet, X. Peptic ulcer. Med Clin. (2023) 161:260–6. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2023.05.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Almadi, MA, Lu, Y, Alali, AA, and Barkun, AN. Peptic ulcer disease. Lancet. (2024) 404:68–81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00155-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kamada, T, Satoh, K, Itoh, T, Ito, M, Iwamoto, J, Okimoto, T, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for peptic ulcer disease 2020. J Gastroenterol. (2021) 56:303–22. doi: 10.1007/s00535-021-01769-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Sonnenberg, A. Time trends of ulcer mortality in Europe. Gastroenterology. (2007) 132:2320–7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.108

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Sonnenberg, A. Review article: historic changes of Helicobacter pylori-associated diseases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. (2013) 38:329–42. doi: 10.1111/apt.12380

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Leow, AH, Lim, YY, Liew, WC, and Goh, KL. Time trends in upper gastrointestinal diseases and Helicobacter pylori infection in a multiracial Asian population-a 20-year experience over three time periods. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. (2016) 43:831–7. doi: 10.1111/apt.13550

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Guo, H, Lam, AY, Shaheen, AA, Forbes, N, Kaplan, GG, Andrews, CN, et al. Urban-rural disparities and temporal trends in peptic ulcer disease epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. (2021) 116:296–305. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000997

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Tuerk, E, Doss, S, and Polsley, K. Peptic ulcer disease. Prim Care. (2023) 50:351–62. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2023.03.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Murray, CJL. The global burden of disease study at 30 years. Nat Med. (2022) 28:2019–26. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01990-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Xie, X, Ren, K, Zhou, Z, Dang, C, and Zhang, H. The global, regional and national burden of peptic ulcer disease from 1990 to 2019: a population-based study. BMC Gastroenterol. (2022) 22:58. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02130-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kim, HJ, Fay, MP, Feuer, EJ, and Midthune, DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med. (2000) 19:335–51.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

13. Liu, C, Zhu, S, Zhang, J, Wu, P, Wang, X, Du, S, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of liver cancer due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, 1990–2019: a decomposition and age-period-cohort analysis. J Gastroenterol. (2023) 58:1222–36. doi: 10.1007/s00535-023-02040-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Luo, L. Assessing validity and application scope of the intrinsic estimator approach to the age-period-cohort problem. Demography. (2013) 50:1945–67. doi: 10.1007/s13524-013-0243-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Liu, X, Yu, Y, Wang, M, Mubarik, S, Wang, F, Wang, Y, et al. The mortality of lung cancer attributable to smoking among adults in China and the United States during 1990–2017. Cancer Commun. (2020) 40:611–9. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12099

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Cheng, X, Yang, Y, Schwebel, DC, Liu, Z, Li, L, Cheng, P, et al. Population ageing and mortality during 1990–2017: a global decomposition analysis. PLoS Med. (2020) 17:e1003138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003138

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Das, GP. Standardization and decomposition of rates from cross-classified data. Genus. (1994) 50:171–96.

Google Scholar

18. Das, GP. Recomputation of age-adjusted death rates and age-sex-adjusted birth rates for the United States, 1940–1990. Genus. (1993) 49:165–76.

Google Scholar

19. Nguyen, HV, Naeem, MA, Wichitaksorn, N, and Pears, R. A smart system for short-term price prediction using time series models. Comput Electr Eng. (2019) 76:339–52. doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.04.013

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Zhao, X, Li, C, Ding, G, Heng, Y, Li, A, Wang, W, et al. The burden of Alzheimer's disease mortality in the United States, 1999–2018. J Alzheimers Dis. (2021) 82:803–13. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210225

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Li, Y, Ning, Y, Shen, B, Shi, Y, Song, N, Fang, Y, et al. Temporal trends in prevalence and mortality for chronic kidney disease in China from 1990 to 2019: an analysis of the global burden of disease study 2019. Clin Kidney J. (2023) 16:312–21. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfac218

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Sonnenberg, A, Turner, KO, and Genta, RM. Low prevalence of Helicobacter pylori-positive peptic ulcers in private outpatient endoscopy centers in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. (2020) 115:244–50. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000517

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Clarke, K, Adler, N, Agrawal, D, Bhakta, D, Sata, SS, and Singh, S. Indications for the use of proton pump inhibitors for stress ulcer prophylaxis and peptic ulcer bleeding in hospitalized patients. Am J Med. (2022) 135:313–7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.09.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Fan, HP, Zhou, Y, Chen, ML, Qiu, KH, Feng, X, Zhou, C, et al. Effect of proton pump inhibitors versus histamine-2 receptor antagonists on acute kidney injury in septic patients at high risk for developing stress ulcers. Pharmacotherapy. (2024) 44:539–48. doi: 10.1002/phar.2947

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Oshima, T, and Miwa, H. Potent potassium-competitive acid blockers: a new era for the treatment of acid-related diseases. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. (2018) 24:334–44. doi: 10.5056/jnm18029

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Prayoga, DK, Aulifa, DL, Budiman, A, and Levita, J. Plants with anti-ulcer activity and mechanism: a review of preclinical and clinical studies. Drug Des Devel Ther. (2024) 18:193–213. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S446949

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Sabbi, T, Dall'Oglio, L, De Angelis, P, Torroni, E, Colistro, F, Azzolina, M, et al. Utility of a stool antigen test to detect the incidence of Helicobacter pylori infection and familial and community environmental risk factors for this infection in pediatric age. Pediatr Med Chir. (2012) 34:89–95. doi: 10.4081/pmc.2012.66

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Zheng, Y, Xue, M, Cai, Y, Liao, S, Yang, H, Wang, Z, et al. Hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease in China: current features and outcomes. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2020) 35:2122–30. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15119

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Saleh, M, Sohrabpour, AA, Mehrabi, MR, Seyhoun, I, and Vaezi, AA. Therapeutic approach of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in refractory peptic ulcer. Stem Cell Res Ther. (2021) 12:515. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02584-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Cazacu, SM, Surlin, VM, Rogoveanu, I, Goganau, A, Iovanescu, VF, Ghinea, AL, et al. Trends for admission and mortality in peptic ulcers at a tertiary referral hospital during the 2017–2021 period. Chirurgia. (2024) 119:404–16. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.2923

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Ma, Y, Zhang, L, Wei, R, Dai, W, Zeng, R, Luo, D, et al. Risks of digestive diseases in long COVID: evidence from a population-based cohort study. BMC Med. (2024) 22:14. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03236-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Xu, Y, Li, X, Zhu, B, Liang, H, Fang, C, Gong, Y, et al. Characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential evidence for persistent fecal viral shedding. Nat Med. (2020) 26:502–5. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0817-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Xu, J, Chu, M, Zhong, F, Tan, X, Tang, G, Mai, J, et al. Digestive symptoms of COVID-19 and expression of ACE2 in digestive tract organs. Cell Death Discov. (2020) 6:76. doi: 10.1038/s41420-020-00307-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Xiao, F, Tang, M, Zheng, X, Liu, Y, Li, X, and Shan, H. Evidence for gastrointestinal infection of SARS-CoV-2. Gastroenterology. (2020) 158:1831–3.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.055

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Huang, C, Wang, Y, Li, X, Ren, L, Zhao, J, Hu, Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. (2020) 395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Chen, LK. Urbanization and population aging: converging trends of demographic transitions in modern world. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2022) 101:104709. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104709

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Lewis, C, and Buffel, T. Aging in place and the places of aging: a longitudinal study. J Aging Stud. (2020) 54:100870. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100870

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Aydin OFTatlıparmak, AC. Predicting mortality in geriatric patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: a retrospective comparative study of four scoring systems. PeerJ. (2025) 13:e19090. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19090

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Nie, X, Xie, R, and Tuo, B. Effects of estrogen on the gastrointestinal tract. Dig Dis Sci. (2018) 63:583–96. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-4939-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Varì, R, Scazzocchio, B, D'Amore, A, Giovannini, C, Gessani, S, and Masella, R. Gender-related differences in lifestyle may affect health status. Ann Ist Super Sanita. (2016) 52:158–66. doi: 10.4415/ANN_16_02_06

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: global disease burden, peptic ulcer, autoregressive integrated moving average model, join-point regression, age-period-cohort analysis

Citation: Tan R, Zhao D, Zhang X, Liu T, Han C, Li Z, Qi C and Wang Z (2025) Gender and age differences in the global burden of peptic ulcers: an analysis based on GBD data from 1990 to 2021. Front. Med. 12:1586270. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1586270

Received: 02 March 2025; Accepted: 07 April 2025;
Published: 28 April 2025.

Edited by:

Shi Xue Dai, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, China

Reviewed by:

Tamer A. Addissouky, University of Menoufia, Egypt
Yujun Xiong, Peking University, China

Copyright © 2025 Tan, Zhao, Zhang, Liu, Han, Li, Qi and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhaohui Wang, d3pocWl3ZWlAMTI2LmNvbQ==

These authors share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.