Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med., 21 July 2025

Sec. Family Medicine and Primary Care

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1609812

This article is part of the Research TopicThe Increasing Relevance of Traditional Medicine Systems for the Primary Health Care Sector and General Practice: Global Research Perspectives – Volume IIView all 20 articles

Effectiveness of Japanese traditional medicine (Kamikihito and Saikokeishito) for treating long COVID: a prospective observational study


Rie Ono,,Rie Ono1,2,3Shin Takayama,,*Shin Takayama1,2,4*Ryutaro Arita,,&#x;Ryutaro Arita1,2,4†Kota Ishizawa&#x;Kota Ishizawa2†Akiko Kikuchi,,Akiko Kikuchi1,2,4Michiaki AbeMichiaki Abe2Minoru Ohsawa,,Minoru Ohsawa1,2,4Natsumi Saito,Natsumi Saito1,2Takeshi KannoTakeshi Kanno2Koh Onodera,,Koh Onodera1,2,4Tadashi Ishii,,Tadashi Ishii1,2,4
  • 1Department of Kampo Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • 2Department of Education and Support for Regional Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • 3Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
  • 4Department of Kampo and Integrative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

Background: Long COVID symptoms, especially brain fog, significantly impair patient quality of life (QOL); however, effective treatments remain elusive. Japanese traditional medicine (JTM, usually called Kampo medicine) is often used adjunctively to treat patients with diverse manifestations of long COVID.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of JTM in treating long COVID using a comprehensive QOL assessment.

Methods: This single-center, prospective observational study evaluated QOL changes in patients with symptoms persisting beyond 28 days from the onset of COVID-19 (long COVID) who visited our general medicine outpatient department between October 2021 and August 2024. The treatment plan was determined by the attending physician based on the patient’s condition. The health-related QOL (HR-QOL) was comprehensively assessed using EuroQol-5 demensions-5levels (EQ-5D-5L) scores (ranging from −0.025 to 1.000, with higher values indicating better HR-QOL) at baseline and 3 months after the first visit. The formulations and factors associated with QOL changes were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results: We analyzed 112 patients. The most common symptoms were fatigue (83.9%). The median (interquartile range) HR-QOL of the entire cohort significantly increased from 0.711 (0.561–0.711) at baseline to 0.833 (0.671–0.890) at 3 months (p < 0.0001); the proportion of patients exceeding the national standard significantly increased from 7.1% to 20.4% (p = 0.0037). The brain fog patients group (50.0%, N = 56), the median (interquartile range) HR-QOL of the entire cohort significantly increased from 0.677 (0.551–0.770) at baseline to 0.750 (0.623–0.846) at 3 months (p < 0.005). However, the proportion of patients achieving the Japanese average HR-QOL did not show improvement significantly. A total of 101 patients (90.2%) were treated with JTM, and a combination of kamikihito and saikokeishito was administered to 20 patients. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that the combination usage was associated with greater improvements in the HR-QOL in all patients (odds ratio 5.4) and brain fog patients’ group (odds ratio 6.1).

Conclusion: Long COVID treatment involving JTM improved the patients’ QOL at 3 months. The combination of kamikihito with saikokeishito may be a potential treatment option for long COVID. However, a randomized controlled trial is required to confirm its efficacy.

1 Introduction

The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused COVID-19, a pandemic that has had a significant global impact. Although the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the end of the public health emergency of international concern in May 2023 (1), ongoing infections with variant strains have led to over 776 million cases and 7 million deaths globally (2).

The condition known as “long COVID,” in which the symptoms persist beyond the acute phase of infection, has been recognized since the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. The prevalence of long COVID varies based on the survey methodology and the time of assessment, with reported rates ranging from 7 to 88% (35). Given that long COVID can develop even in mild cases that do not require hospitalization during the acute phase, and considering the large number of individuals infected worldwide, it is estimated that at least 70 million people have experienced long COVID symptoms to date.

COVID-19 is a systemic disease that can affect multiple organ systems, including the respiratory, neurological, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal systems (6). Long COVID presents with a wide array of symptoms involving diverse bodily functions. Common symptoms include fatigue, headache, cognitive impairment (“brain fog”), musculoskeletal pain, breathlessness, olfactory and taste dysfunction, and insomnia (79).

These symptoms frequently lead to limitations or disturbances in daily life activities and social functioning (10), resulting in a decline in the quality of life (QOL) over time (11, 12). Notably, long COVID has been reported to pose a higher risk in younger individuals, leading to significant social implications. Despite numerous investigations, treatment strategies have primarily focused on rehabilitation and cognitive behavioral therapy in the absence of organic pathology (13). While some studies have suggested the efficacy of pharmacological interventions such as antidepressants (14), a definitive treatment has yet to be established. Therefore, long COVID continues to pose a significant medical problem (1517), and the search for novel therapeutic strategies remains a critical public health issue.

The occurrence of postinfectious sequelae is not limited to COVID-19 (18). Japanese traditional medicine (JTM, usually called Kampo medicine) has been reported to be effective in patients with postinfectious conditions. Moreover, JTM is commonly employed for the management of psychiatric symptoms (19) and age-related issues such as frailty (20) and cognitive decline (21), which are also prevalent in long COVID. Additionally, JTM is integrated into the healthcare system, is covered by national insurance, and can be prescribed by physicians with licenses for Western medicine, leading to a high utilization rate of 86% (22). As a result, JTM is commonly used to manage long COVID symptoms (23, 24).

We have previously demonstrated that JTM was used in approximately 80% of patients with symptoms 1 month post-COVID-19 and that the prevalence of symptoms at 6 months was relatively low (25). Our previous study before the Delta variant was reported, showed that respiratory symptoms were the most common symptom of long COVID. However, the Omicron variant has led to a notable increase in the number of patients presenting with fatigue and brain fog, and those with multiple symptoms. In this study, we aimed to assess the impact of complementary JTM on the comprehensive quality of life (QOL) of patients with various symptoms of long COVID. Given that patients with brain fog experience a notable clinical reduction in QOL and present treatment challenges, we conducted separate analysis of this subgroup.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Ethics

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Tokyo guidelines for human studies and was approved by the ethical committee of Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan (approval number: 2021-447).

2.2 Setting

In this study, the term “long COVID” was defined according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria (UK), which have defined the following three clinical stages of conditions after COVID-19: acute COVID-19 (symptoms resolving within 4 weeks of onset), ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 (symptoms persisting between 4 and 12 weeks), and post-COVID conditions (symptoms persisting for 12 weeks or longer) (26). The latter two stages are collectively termed “long COVID.” In this study, patients were classified according to these definitions.

In Japan, COVID-19 has spread since January 2020. Subsequently, the Alpha variant became predominant in March 2021, the Delta variant in July 2021, and the Omicron variant in December 2021 (27, 28).

The department of general medicine at Tohoku University Hospital initiated care for patients with persistent COVID-19 conditions in March 2021. At their first visit, the patients underwent a comprehensive assessment, including appropriate diagnostic tests based on their presenting symptoms. Specialist referrals were made, as required. The decision regarding the use of Western medicine, JTM, or a combination of both was made by the attending physician, considering the patient’s condition and preferences. Treatment allocation was not randomized, and potential confounding by indication may have influenced the treatment effects. When JTM was used for treatment, all prescriptions were Extract Granules for Ethical Use (Tsumura & Co). JTM for ethical use is approved by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and their manufacturing method complies with Japanese Pharmacopoeia as regards their component and quantity. The term Ethical use here means that a medicine can only be handed out to patients with a doctor’s prescription and the National Health Insurance will cover the expense. The Japanese Pharmacopoeia (The Japanese Pharmacopoeia seventeenth edition English version, 2021) officially defines the origin and description of the listed crude drugs and JTM extracts and elaborates on their limited values and testing methods. Detailed information on each medication is available on STORK.1 The dosage was set to the standard adult dose as specified in the package insert, and it was sometimes reduced depending on patients’ age, condition, and concurrent use of other JTM formulations.

Considering that patients with long COVID often experience multiple symptoms, a comprehensive score is important for evaluating treatment effectiveness. Consequently, to assess the impact of our interventions, patients completed the EuroQol-5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) (29) questionnaires at baseline and the 3-month follow-up. EQ-5D-5L, a widely used instrument for assessing health status, consists of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is rated on a 5-point scale (1 = no problems, 2 = slight problems, 3 = moderate problems, 4 = severe problems, and 5 = extreme problems). The patient responses are then converted into a health-related QOL (HR-QOL) value using a standardized value set (ranges between −0.025 and 1.000, with higher values indicating better HR-QOL) (30). The Japanese standard values were established through a large-scale survey targeting individuals aged 16–89 years (31). The EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) assesses a patient’s self-rated health status on a scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).

2.3 Study design

This prospective observational study included patients who visited our general medicine outpatient department between March 2021 and August 2024 with complaints of COVID-19 sequelae. Patients were excluded if they lacked a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis, presented within 4 weeks of symptom onset, were under 18 years of age, had a follow-up period shorter than 3 months, or lacked EQ-5D-5L data. We also excluded three patients without medication. The reason for this exclusion was as follows: Two patients tended to improve conditions at their initial visit, resulting in the clinical decision that medication was unnecessary. The remaining patient was excluded due to a temporary worsening of a prior psychiatric condition, for which treatment at our facility was not required.

The primary outcome was the difference in HR-QOL (ranges between -0.025 and 1.000; higher values indicate better HR-QOL) assessed at baseline and 3 months. The secondary outcomes included: the proportion of patients who achieved the Japanese average HR-QOL at 3 months; changes in EQ-VAS and individual dimensions levels; and changes in the proportion of patients reporting no or slight problems (level ≤ 2).

Next, we defined “improvement” as ΔQOL (HR-QOL [3 months] – HR-QOL [baseline]) being greater than 0.065. This threshold is based on previously reported minimally important differences (MID) for EQ-5D-5L (32, 33). We then explored multivariate analysis to identify factors associated with improvement.

A separate analysis was performed on patients with brain fog. The definition of brain fog in this analysis was based on a questionnaire used by our department. Patients were classified as having brain fog if they provided three or more positive responses to questions regarding cognitive impairment or they presented evident cognitive decline symptoms that impeded their daily functioning.

2.4 Statistical analyses

Continuous variables were presented as median (interquartile range (IQR): 25th–75th percentile). Comparisons between the values at baseline and 3 months were made using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, whereas the Mann-Whitney U test was used for between-group comparisons. Categorical variables were expressed as the number of patients (%) and their values were compared using either chi-square or Fisher’s exact test.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with QOL improvement. A comprehensive univariate logistic regression analysis was also performed to identify the potential patient outcome predictors. These included factors previously reported to be associated with long COVID: female sex, older age, high body mass index (BMI), vaccination, smoking, multiple comorbidities, psychiatric disorders (34, 35), the duration from symptom onset, and duration of symptoms (potential relevance to symptom changes). We further considered including variables with a p-value less than 0.1, comparing the improvement and non-improvement groups. Selecting explanatory variables for multivariate logistic regression analysis was based on: factors associated with symptom persistence in previous literature, the JTM prescriptions treatment effects, comprehensive univariate logistic regression analysis results, and each group sample size.

Statistical analyses were performed using Graph Pad Prism 10 for MacOS (version 10.4.0) (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, United States).

3 Results

Of the 242 patients who visited our department during the study period, 112 were eligible for the analysis. Figure 1 provides a detailed overview of patient enrollment.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Flowchart describing patient enrollment. Of the 242 patients who visited our department during the study period, 112 were eligible for the analysis. The following patients were excluded: 8 without a confirmed diagnosis, 32 who presented with the symptoms <4 weeks after symptom onset, 13 under the age of 18 years, 56 with a follow-up period of <3 months (22 discharged following improvement, 21 transferred to other departments or hospitals, and 13 with unknown clinical course), 18 with missing QOL data, and 3 with no medication. HR-QOL, health related-quality of life.

Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of all included patients, presented alongside those of patients with brain fog (N = 56). The patient background was characterized by a high proportion of working-age individuals, a predominance of non-hospitalized patients, and a majority of patients from the Omicron variant period.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Clinical variables of all study participants.

Table 2 shows the symptoms (visual analog scale ≥ 20) of long COVID at the initial visit. The median number of symptoms per patient was four. The most common symptom was fatigue, which was observed in 94 patients (83.9%). Brain fog was the third most common symptom.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Long COVID symptoms of all patients.

Formulation of JTM was used for 101 cases (90.2%), either alone or in combination with Western medicine. Among the 57 kinds used, the most frequently prescribed JTM formulations was saikokeishito (SAKT), followed by kamikihito (KKT) (Table 3 presents the 10 most frequently administered prescriptions). Multiple prescriptions of JTM were often used (median of 2 per patient), with the most prevalent combination being KKT and SAKT. The current prescription of SAKT was SAKT Extract Granules for Ethical Use (Tsumura & Co), wherein 7.5g of SAKT extract granules contain a dried extract of 9 crude drugs: Japanese Pharmacopeia (JP) Bupleurum Root (5.0g), JP Pinellia Tuber (4.0g), JP Scutellaria Root (2.0g), JP Glycyrrhiza (2.0g), JP Cinnamon Bark (2.0g), JP Peony Root (2.0g), JP Jujube (2.0g), JP Ginseng (2.0g), JP Ginger (1.0g) (The Japanese Pharmacopeia 18th edition, 2021) (Table 4a). The current prescription of KKT was KKT Extract Granules for Ethical Use (Tsumura & Co) (Table 4b). Saikokeishito (TJ-10) is indicated for the relief of the following symptoms of those patients with fever, diaphoresis, rigors, physical pain, headache, and nausea: febrile diseases, such as common cold, influenza, pneumonia, and pulmonary tuberculosis; and stomach pit tension pain, such as gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, hepatic dysfunction, and pancreatitis. The current prescription of KKT was KKT Extract Granules for Ethical Use (Tsumura & Co) wherein 7.5g of KKT extract granules contain a dried extract of 9 crude drugs: JP Astragalus Root (3.0g), JP Bupleurum Root (3.0g), JP Jujube Seed (3.0g), JP Atractylodes Lancea Rhizome (3.0g), JP Ginseng (3.0g), JP Poria Sclerotium (3.0g), JP Longan Aril (3.0g), JP Polygala Root (2.0g), JP Gardenia Fruit (2.0g), JP Jujube (2.0g), JP Japanese Angelica (2.0g) Root, JP Glycyrrhiza (1.0g), JP Ginger (1.0g), JP Saussurea Root (1.0g). Kamikihito (TJ-137) is indicated for the relief of the following symptoms of those patients with delicate constitution and a poor complexion: anemia, insomnia, mental anxiety, and neurosis.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Content of treatment for the symptoms.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Outcome data: the change in parameters related EQ-5D-5L.

3.1 Improvements in the HR-QOL

The initial HR-QOL was 0.711 (0.562–0.763), with eight patients (7.1%) above the national standard. After 3 months, the HR-QOL significantly improved to 0.833 (0.671–0.890) (p < 0.0001), a difference of 0.087 (0–0.177) surpassing the MID. The number of patients exceeding the national standard also significantly increased to 23 (20.4%) (p = 0.004) (Figure 2a, Table 4a). In addition, there was a change of 10 (−5–20) in the EQ-VAS, demonstrating statistically significant improvement (p < 0.0001).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Bar charts of the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) status at baseline and at 3 months. The HR-QOL ranged between −0.025 and 1.000; higher values indicate better HR-QOL. (a) All 112 study participants were evaluated for the change in HR-QOL from baseline to 3 months. The HR-QOL significantly improved from 0.711 at baseline to 0.833 at 3 months (p < 0.0001). (b) A total of 56 patients with brain fog were evaluated for the change in HR-QOL from baseline to 3 months. The HR-QOL significantly improved from 0.677 at baseline to 0.750 at 3 months (p = 0.005).

Regarding each item on the questionnaire of EQ-5D-5L, the usual activity level demonstrated a significant reduction (p < 0.0001), and the number of patients with a level of 2 or less significantly increased from 45 to 69 (40.2% vs. 61.6%; p = 0.001) (Table 5a). Furthermore, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression also exhibited a significant decrease in level (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001) and a significant increase in the number of patients with a level ≤ 2 (46.4% vs. 67.0%; p = 0.002, 63.4% vs. 80.4%; p = 0.005).

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Outcomes for individual items of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.

In the subgroup analyses, the brain fog group showed a significant improvement in the HR-QOL (p = 0.005) and the EQ VAS (p = 0.007) (Figure 2b; Table 4b). Although the proportion of patients with HR-QOL above the national standard did not increase significantly (p = 0.11), regarding each item on the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, the usual activities dimension demonstrated a significant reduction (p = 0.0004). However, the proportion of patients with a level of 2 or less did not change significantly (p = 0.053) (Table 5b). Conversely, the pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression dimensions exhibited a significant decrease in level (p = 0.0003 and 0.0006, respectively) and a significant increase in the proportion of patients with a level ≤ 2 (p = 0.02 and 0.007, respectively).

3.2 KKT/SAKT combined usage as candidates for long COVID treatment

The improved group (ΔQOL > 0.065) comprised 64 individuals (Supplementary table 1). The results of the univariate analysis showed that KKT/SAKT combined usage was a factor associated with QOL improvement (p = 0.03) (Table 6a). Multivariate analysis was conducted using the following factors: age, vaccination, duration from the onset of COVID-19 to the first outpatient visit, and KKT/SAKT combination usage.

TABLE 6a
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6a. Comprehensive univariate logistic regression analysis to identify potential predictors of the improvement of HR-QOL.

TABLE 6b
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6b. Comprehensive univariate logistic regression analysis to identify potential predictors of the improvement of HR-QOL (brain fog patients).

The odds ratio (OR) for QOL improvement with KKT/SAKT combination usage within 3 months of treatment was 5.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4–30.1, p = 0.03) (Figure 3a)

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Forest plots of associations between medications and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) outcomes. (a) Kamikihito (KKT) and saikokeishito (SAKT) combination use within 3 months was significantly associated with HR-QOL improvement (OR: 5.4, 95% CI: 1.4–30.1, p = 0.029). (b) Kamikihito (KKT) and saikokeishito (SAKT) combination use within 3 months were significantly associated with HR-QOL improvement (OR: 6.1, 95% CI: 1.6–30.8, p = 0.014). HR-QOL, health related-quality of life; CI, confidence interval; KKT, kamikihito; SAKT, saikokeishito; BMI, body mass index.

In the subgroup analyses, the brain fog group had 30 individuals in the improvement group (Supplementary table 2). Univariate analysis suggested a potential association between the KKT/SAKT combination usage (p = 0.02) and high ferritin levels (p = 0.008) with QOL (Table 6b). However, considering previous reports, we conducted a multivariate analysis with KKT/SAKT combination usage and high BMI as variables. As a result, the OR for QOL improvement with KKT/SAKT combination usage within 3 months of treatment was 6.1 (95% CI: 1.6–30.8) (p = 0.01) (Figure 3b).

4 Discussion

In Japan, the integrated practice of traditional and Western medicine allows for healthcare that combines the strengths of both approaches. Given the diverse pathophysiological conditions that characterize long COVID, and the symptoms resulting from these conditions, an approach leveraging the advantages of both medical systems may be the most effective for patient treatment.

This study assessed the HR-QOL changes in patients with long COVID with a high prevalence of fatigue and found a significant improvement in the HR-QOL at 3 months, and the observed difference was greater than the MID. We noted a significant increase in the proportion of patients exceeding the national standard value (7.1% vs. 20.4%). JTM was used in 90.2% of patients, and treatments that included KKT/SAKT combination related to an improvement in HR-QOL (OR 5.4).

For patients with BF, the initial HR-QOL was observed to be low, and there was no statistically significant increase in the proportion of patients achieving the national standard. Nevertheless, a statistically significant improvement in HR-QOL was noted. The etiology of brain fog remains unclear and effective treatments are lacking, despite ongoing research. We observed symptomatic improvement in these patients at the 3-month follow-up. KKT/SAKT combination usage is related to the improvement of HR-QOL (OR 6.1). A conservative estimate of the prevalence of brain fog as 10% (reported range 10–40%) (36, 37) in patients with long COVID translates to a number needed-to-treat of 3.3. Thus, administration of KKT/SAKT combination to approximately three patients could be expected to result in improvement in one patient. This suggests a potential benefit, given the current lack of established treatments for brain fog. We report here, for the first time, the potential efficacy of KKT/SAKT combination usage for brain fog in this patient population. As treatment options for long COVID are still being explored, this finding warrants further comparative research in future studies.

Long COVID is characterized by a wide range of symptoms and several potential underlying mechanisms have been proposed, including persistent viral infection (38, 39), mitochondrial dysfunction (40, 41), immune dysregulation (42, 43), endothelial dysfunction (44), neuroinflammation (45, 46), and gut microbiota dysbiosis (47). Neuroinflammation-induced astrocyte alternation contributes to blood-brain barrier dysfunction (48), neuroendocrine system dysregulation (49), and disturbances in brain metabolism (50), leading to the development of neuropsychiatric symptoms. Furthermore, SARS-CoV-2 infection results in cognitive complaints and neuropsychological alterations through structural and functional alterations in the hippocampus and related cortices (51).

KKT is a formulation that is indicated for insomnia and mental anxiety in patients with a state of energy deficiency that impairs bodily functions (“Qi deficiency”; a traditional East Asian medical concept) (52). KKT and its constituent crude drugs may have potential efficacy against the multiple mechanisms underlying long COVID. KKT has been reported to mitigate stress responses through the activation of oxytocin neurons and receptors that orchestrate social and emotional behaviors (53). KKT promotes hippocampal neurogenesis, thereby exhibiting antidepressant and cognitive-enhancing effects (54). Additionally, Bupleuri Radix, a constituent crude drug of KKT, has demonstrated neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects (55). Ginseng Radix has been studied for its immunomodulatory properties and its influence on the gut microbiome and gut-associated immune system (56). Glycyrrhiza has been reported to exhibit anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity (57).

SAKT is prescribed to patients with symptoms of subacute postinfectious cold-like conditions, such as mild fever, headache, musculoskeletal pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Bupleuri Radix, Ginseng Radix, and Glycyrrhiza are also constituent crude drugs of SAKT. Furthermore, Baicalin, a component of Scutellariae Radix, which is a constituent crude drug of SAKT, has been shown to exhibit anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity (58) and suppress microglial activation in vitro (59).

KKT or SAKT monotherapy often demonstrates clinical effectiveness. A prior case report has elucidated the effectiveness of JTM treatment, including KKT, for fatigue accompanied by decreased concentrations, which suggests the positive effects of KKT (60). In a case series, we reported that SAKT was effective against fatigue without brain fog following COVID-19 infection (61). However, the treatment showed limited effectiveness in patients with severe brain fog symptoms. Combining these formulations led to noticeable symptom relief, as a result, the number of prescriptions gradually escalated. This suggests that SAKT and KKT functioned additively, enhancing their effects by sharing some crude drugs without any antagonistic interactions.

While JTM usually emphasizes individual constitutions, the results of this study provided preliminary insights into the potential general efficacy of the combination of KKT and SAKT in the management of long COVID.

On the other hand, in this study, a wide range of JTM formulations apart from KKT and SAKT were utilized due to the multifarious concurrent symptoms. It has been reported that long COVID symptoms can be categorized into distinct patterns (62). Future investigation may identify tailored prescriptions corresponding to each of the patterns.

However, we emphasize that long COVID should not be managed solely with JTM. Indeed, combination medication constituted 65.2% of the therapeutic interventions. COVID-19 has been reported to be associated with the onset and exacerbation of diseases such as diabetes and autoimmune disorders (63, 64). We observed frequent occurrences of exacerbation of comorbidities and development of new organic diseases. Western medicine is superior for the differentiation and treatment of these conditions, whereas JTM often provides relief for symptoms unresponsive to Western medicine or symptoms with unknown causes. Therefore, a combination of Western and traditional medical approaches is thought to be the optimal strategy for managing patients with diverse long COVID symptoms.

When using JTM formulations, especially in instances of multiple drug administration, it is necessary to pay attention to potential adverse effects, just as with those of Western medications. Glycyrrhizin, a major constituent of JTM formulations, carries the risk of pseudoaldosteronism, where high dosage, long-term use, and older age are constitutional risk factors (65). Daily dosage should be limited, and its use is contraindicated in patients with hypokalemia or uncontrolled hypertension. Among JTM, formulations containing Scutellariae Radix, a component of SAKT have a relatively high frequency of adverse effects (66), such as liver dysfunction or interstitial pneumonia (67). Regular examinations are conducted to monitor for the adverse effects during JTM administration. If the symptoms are relieved, a gradual dose reduction and discontinuation of administration should be considered.

This study has several limitations. The possibility of natural recovery in patients cannot be excluded, given that this study did not use a control group, and MID can vary depending on the disease. Owing to the limited number of cases in the BF group, the number of factors that could be included in the multivariate analysis was restricted. Furthermore, effective utilization of traditional medicine necessitates specialized knowledge, and variations in physician proficiency may have influenced the observed effects. Additionally, the study did not isolate the effects of KKT/SAKT combined usage from those of combination therapy with Western medicine. However, we believe that the add-on effect of KKT/SAKT can still be evaluated. These limitations warrant future randomized controlled trials.

5 Conclusions

Considering the diverse pathophysiological conditions and symptoms of long COVID, we believe that an approach that leverages the advantages of both Western medicine and JTM may be a potentially effective strategy. Furthermore, effective therapies for long COVID and brain fog have not yet been established. Our finding, that the use of a combination of KKT and SAKT improved the comprehensive QOL, is of considerable importance as it points towards the possibility of new treatment options. However, a well-designed randomized controlled trial with a larger sample size and longer follow-up is needed to validate its efficacy and determine the appropriate dosing and indications.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the ethical committee of Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan (approval number: 2021-447). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

RO: Investigation, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Conceptualization, Methodology. ST: Investigation, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. RA: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Investigation, Validation. KI: Validation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Formal Analysis. AK: Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing. MA: Validation, Writing – review & editing, Investigation. MO: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. NS: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. TK: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Investigation. KO: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. TI: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Validation, Supervision.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. Data extraction was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (grant no. 24K13282).

Acknowledgments

The authors used the translation function of Gemini AI and Grammarly to assist in the writing of this manuscript. This manuscript underwent English language editing by Editage (www.editage.com).

Conflict of interest

RA, ST, MO, AK and TI belong to the Department of Kampo and Integrative Medicine, Tohoku University School of Medicine. The department received a grant from Tsumura & Co, a Japanese manufacturer of Kampo medicine; however, the grant was used per Tohoku University guidelines. Potential conflicts of interest were addressed by the Tohoku University Benefit Reciprocity Committee and were managed appropriately.

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. The authors used the translation function of Gemini AI and Grammarly to assist in the writing of this paper.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1609812/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

References

1. World Health Organization [WHO]. Statement on the Fifteenth Meeting of the IHR (2005) Emergency Committee on the COVID-19 pandemic. (2025). Available online at: https://www.who.int/news/item/05-05-2023-statement-on-the-fifteenthmeeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committeeregarding-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-pandemic (accessed January 31, 2025).

Google Scholar

2. World Health Organization [WHO]. WHO COVID-19 Dashboard. (2025). https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/deaths?n=o (accessed January 31, 2025).

Google Scholar

3. Woodrow M, Carey C, Ziauddeen N, Thomas R, Akrami A, Lutje V, et al. Systematic review of the prevalence of long COVID. Open Forum Infect Dis. (2023) 10:ofad233. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad233

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kim Y, Bae S, Chang H, Kim S. Long COVID prevalence and impact on quality of life 2 years after acute COVID-19. Sci Rep. (2023) 13:11207. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36995-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Davis H, Assaf G, McCorkell L, Wei H, Low R, Re’em Y, et al. Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact. EClinicalMedicine. (2021) 38:101019. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Salamanna F, Maglio M, Landini M, Fini M. Body localization of ACE-2: On the trail of the keyhole of SARS-CoV-2. Front Med. (2020) 7:594495. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.594495

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Soriano J, Murthy S, Marshall J, Relan P, Diaz J. WHO clinical case definition working group on post-COVID-19 condition. A clinical case definition of post-COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus. Lancet Infect Dis. (2022) 22:e102–7. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00703-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Lopez-Leon S, Wegman-Ostrosky T, Perelman C, Sepulveda R, Rebolledo P, Cuapio A, et al. More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:16144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95565-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Su S, Zhao Y, Zeng N, Liu X, Zheng Y, Sun J, et al. Epidemiology, clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and management of long COVID: An update. Mol Psychiatry. (2023) 28:4056–69. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02171-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Azambuja P, Bastos L, Batista-da-Silva A, Ramos G, Kurtz P, Dias C, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and impact of long COVID in a socially vulnerable community in Brazil: A prospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Am. (2024) 37:100839. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Naik H, Wilton J, Tran K, Janjua N, Levin A, Zhang W. Long-term health-related quality of life in working-Age COVID-19 survivors: A cross-sectional study. Am J Med. (2024) 138:850–861.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.05.016.

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Poudel A, Zhu S, Cooper N, Roderick P, Alwan N, Tarrant C, et al. Impact of Covid-19 on health-related quality of life of patients: A structured review. PLoS One. (2021) 16:e0259164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259164

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Ivlev I, Wagner J, Phillips T, Treadwell J. Interventions for long COVID: A narrative review. J Gen Intern Med. (2025) [Online ahead of print]. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09254-z.

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. McIntyre R, Phan L, Kwan A, Mansur R, Rosenblat J, Guo Z, et al. Vortioxetine for the treatment of post-COVID-19 condition: A randomized controlled trial. Brain. (2024) 147:849–57. doi: 10.1093/brain/awad377

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Vartanian K, Fish D, Kenton N, Gronowski B, Wright B, Robicsek A. Integrating patient-reported physical, mental, and social impacts to classify long COVID experiences. Sci Rep. (2023) 13:16288. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43615-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Al-Aly Z, Davis H, McCorkell L, Soares L, Wulf-Hanson S, Iwasaki A, et al. Long COVID science, research and policy. Nat Med. (2024) 30:2148–64. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03173-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Ziauddeen N, Pantelic M, O’Hara M, Hastie C, Alwan N. Impact of long COVID-19 on work: A co-produced survey. Lancet. (2023) 402(Suppl 1):S98. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02157-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Xie Y, Choi T, Al-Aly Z. Long-term outcomes following hospital admission for COVID-19 versus seasonal influenza: A cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. (2024) 24:239–55. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00684-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Suzuki T, Kikuchi A, Kaneko A, Arita R, Nogami T, Saito N, et al. A review of frequently used Kampo prescriptions: Part 2—Hangekobokuto. Trad Kampo Med. (2023) 10:103–19. doi: 10.1002/tkm2.1373

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Takayama S, Michihara S, Kimura Y, Morinaga A, Miyagawa K Tsushima N, et al. Review of frequently used Kampo prescriptions: Part 4, Ninjin’yoeito. Trad Kampo Med. (2023) 10:224–52. doi: 10.1002/tkm2.1387

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Yamaguchi H, Yoshino T, Oizumi H, Arita R, Nogami T, Takayama S. A review of frequently used Kampo prescriptions. Part 3. Yokukansan. Trad Kampo Med. (2023) 10:197–223. doi: 10.1002/tkm2.1386

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Uneda K, Yoshino T, Ito H, Imoto S, Nogami T. Current situation and future issues with Kampo medicine: A survey of Japanese physicians. Trad Kampo Med. (2024) 11:156–66. doi: 10.1002/tkm2.1418

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Tokumasu K, Ueda K, Honda H, Sunada N, Sakurada Y, Matsuda Y, et al. Application of Kampo medicines for treatment of general fatigue due to long COVID. Medicina. (2022) 58:730. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060730

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Namiki T, Nezu M, Igari H. T*rends in patients with long COVID (COVID-19 long-term effects) in the Kampo outpatient department of infectious diseases at our clinic — from early cases. Kampo Med. (2022) 73:214–9. doi: 10.3937kampomed.73.214

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Ono R, Arita R, Takayama S, Kanno T, Kikuchi A, Suzuki S, et al. Progress and treatment of “long COVID” in non-hospitalized patients: A single-center retrospective cohort study. Trad Kampo Med. (2023) 10:150–8. doi: 10.1002/tkm2.1370

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Venkatesan P. NICE guideline on long COVID. Lancet Respir Med. (2021) 9:129. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00031-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Sakurai A, Morioka S, Tsuzuki S, Matsunaga N, Saito S, Arai N, et al. Difference in clinical courses and causes of COVID-19-related deaths in hospitalized patients infected with omicron and delta variants: A retrospective study in Japan. GHM Open. (2024) 4:23–31. doi: 10.35772/ghmo.2023.01025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Mitsushima S, Horiguchi H, Taniguchi K. Alpha and Delta variants and vaccination effectiveness against severity in COVID-19 inpatients based on medical claims in Japan. GHM Open. (2023) 3:28–36. doi: 10.35772/ghmo.2023.01005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D-5L User Guide. (2019). Available online at: https://euroqol.org/publications/user-guides (accessed January 24, 2025).

Google Scholar

30. Ikeda S, Shiroiwa T, Igarashi A, Noto S, Fukuda T, Saito S, et al. D*eveloping a Japanese version of the EQ-5D-5L value set. J Natl Inst Public Health. (2015) 64:47–55. doi: 10.1026/j.jdermsci.2021.01.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Shiroiwa T, Noto S, Fukuda T. Japanese population norms of EQ-5D-5L and health utilities index mark 3: Disutility catalog by disease and symptom in community settings. Value Health. (2021) 24:1193–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.03.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Cheng L, Chen L, Cheng J, Herdman M, Luo N. Systematic review reveals that EQ-5D minimally important differences vary with treatment type and may decrease with increasing baseline score. J Clin Epidemiol. (2024) 174:111487. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111487

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Al Sayah F, Jin X, Short H, McClure N, Ohinmaa A, Johnson JAA. Systematic literature review of important and meaningful differences in the EQ-5D index and visual analog scale scores. Value Health. (2025) 28:470–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.11.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Tsampasian V, Elghazaly H, Chattopadhyay R, Debski M, Naing T, Garg P, et al. Risk factors associated with post-COVID-19 condition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. (2023) 183:566–80. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.0750

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Luo D, Mei B, Wang P, Li X, Chen X, Wei G, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for persistent symptoms after COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. (2024) 30:328–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.10.016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Premraj L, Kannapadi N, Briggs J, Seal S, Battaglini D, Fanning J, et al. Mid and long-term neurological and neuropsychiatric manifestations of post-COVID-19 syndrome: A meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci. (2022) 434:120162. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120162

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. van der Feltz-Cornelis C, Turk F, Sweetman J, Khunti K, Gabbay M, Shepherd J, et al. Prevalence of mental health conditions and brain fog in people with long COVID: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. (2024) 88:10–22. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.02.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Ghafari M, Hall M, Golubchik T, Ayoubkhani D, House T, MacIntyre-Cockett G, et al. Prevalence of persistent SARS-CoV-2 in a large community surveillance study. Nature. (2024) 626:1094–101. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07029-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Gaebler C, Wang Z, Lorenzi J, Muecksch F, Finkin S, Tokuyama M, et al. Evolution of antibody immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Nature. (2021) 591:639–44. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03207-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Dhariwal R, Dave K, Jain M. Omics-based analysis of mitochondrial dysfunction and BBB integrity in post-COVID-19 sequelae. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:31016. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82180-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Haunhorst S, Dudziak D, Scheibenbogen C, Seifert M, Sotzny F, Finke C, et al. Towards an understanding of physical activity-induced post-exertional malaise: Insights into microvascular alterations and immunometabolic interactions in post-COVID condition and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Infection. (2025) 53:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02386-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Phetsouphanh C, Darley D, Wilson D, Howe A, Munier C, Patel S, et al. Immunological dysfunction persists for 8 months following initial mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Immunol. (2022) 23:210–6. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-01113-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Acosta-Ampudia Y, Monsalve D, Rojas M, Rodríguez Y, Zapata E, Ramírez-Santana C, et al. Persistent autoimmune activation and proinflammatory state in post-coronavirus disease 2019 syndrome. J Infect Dis. (2022) 225:2155–62. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Poyatos P, Luque N, Sabater G, Eizaguirre S, Bonnin M, Orriols R. Endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular risk in post-COVID-19 patients after 6- and 12-months SARS-CoV-2 infection. Infection. (2024) 52:1269–85. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02173-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Poloni T, Medici V, Moretti M, Visonà S, Cirrincione A, Carlos A, et al. COVID-19-related neuropathology and microglial activation in elderly with and without dementia. Brain Pathol. (2021) 31:e12997. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12997

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Soung A, Vanderheiden A, Nordvig A, Sissoko C, Canoll P, Mariani M, et al. COVID-19 induces CNS cytokine expression and loss of hippocampal neurogenesis. Brain. (2022) 145:4193–201. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac270

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Zhang F, Lau R, Liu Q, Su Q, Chan F, Ng S. Gut microbiota in COVID-19: Key microbial changes, potential mechanisms and clinical applications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2023) 20:323–37. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00698-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Greene C, Connolly R, Brennan D, Laffan A, O’Keeffe E, Zaporojan L, et al. Blood-brain barrier disruption and sustained systemic inflammation in individuals with long COVID-associated cognitive impairment. Nat Neurosci. (2024) 27:421–32. doi: 10.1038/s41593-024-01576-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Wahis J, Baudon A, Althammer F, Kerspern D, Goyon S, Hagiwara D, et al. Astrocytes mediate the effect of oxytocin in the central amygdala on neuronal activity and affective states in rodents. Nat Neurosci. (2021) 24:529–41. doi: 10.1038/s41593-021-00800-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Bélanger M, Allaman I, Magistretti P. Brain energy metabolism: Focus on astrocyte-neuron metabolic cooperation. Cell Metab. (2011) 14:724–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.08.016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Zorzo C, Solares L, Mendez M, Mendez-Lopez M. Hippocampal alterations after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review. Behav Brain Res. (2023) 455:114662. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114662

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. World Health Organization [WHO]. International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision. Geneva: World Health Organization (2022).

Google Scholar

53. Maejima Y, Horita S, Yokota S, Ono T, Proks P, Yoshida-Komiya H, et al. Identification of oxytocin receptor activating chemical components from traditional Japanese medicines. J Food Drug Anal. (2021) 29:653–75. doi: 10.38212/2224-6614.3381

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Adachi N, Sakhri F, Ikemoto H, Ohashi Y, Kato M, Inoue T, et al. Kamikihito rescued depressive-like behaviors and hippocampus neurogenesis in chronic restraint stress rats. J Tradit Complement Med. (2021) 12:172–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2021.08.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Li X, Hou R, Qin X, Wu Y, Wu X, Tian J, et al. Synergistic neuroprotective effect of saikosaponin A and albiflorin on corticosterone-induced apoptosis in PC12 cells via regulation of metabolic disorders and neuroinflammation. Mol Biol Rep. (2022) 49:8801–13. doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07730-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Zhao L, Zhang T, Zhang K. Pharmacological effects of ginseng and ginsenosides on intestinal inflammation and the immune system. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1353614. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1353614

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Li J, Xu D, Wang L, Zhang M, Zhang G, Li E, et al. Glycyrrhizic acid inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection by blocking spike protein-mediated cell attachment. Molecules. (2021) 26:6090. doi: 10.3390/molecules26206090

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Song J, Zhang L, Xu Y, Yang D, Zhang L, Yang S, et al. The comprehensive study on the therapeutic effects of baicalein for the treatment of COVID-19 in vivo and in vitro. Biochem Pharmacol. (2021) 183:114302. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114302

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Yang R, Wang R, Xu A, Zhang J, Ma J. Mitigating neurodegenerative diseases: the protective influence of baicalin and baicalein through neuroinflammation regulation. Front Pharmacol. (2024) 15:1425731. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1425731

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Yoshinaga R, Harada N, Naki T, Inoue H, Yano H, Tahara E. A case of post coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) condition, in which the patient suffers from a severe sense of fatigue and brain fog successfully treated with Kampo therapy. Kampo Med. (2022) 73:335–41. doi: 10.3937/kampomed.73.335

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Ono R, Takayama S, Saito N, Arita R, Kikuchi A, Ishizawan K, et al. The effect of Saikokeishito for fatigue of post-COVID condition. J Gen Fam Med. (2024) 47:49–55. doi: 10.14442/generalist.47.49

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Ito F, Terai H, Kondo M, Takemura R, Namkoong H, Asakura T, et al. Cluster analysis of long COVID in Japan and association of its trajectory of symptoms and quality of life. BMJ Open Respir Res. (2024) 11:e002111. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002111

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Ssentongo P, Zhang Y, Witmer L, Chinchilli V, Ba D. Association of COVID-19 with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:20191. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24185-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Sharma C, Bayry J. High risk of autoimmune diseases after COVID-19. Nat Rev Rheumatol. (2023) 19:399–400. doi: 10.1038/s41584-023-00964-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Yoshino T, Shimada S, Homma M, Makino T, Mimura M, Watanabe K. Clinical risk factors of licorice-induced pseudoaldosteronism based on glycyrrhizin-metabolite concentrations: A narrative review. Front Nutr. (2021) 8:719197. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.719197

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Shimada Y, Fujimoto M, Nogami T, Watari H. Adverse events associated with ethical kampo formulations: Analysis of the domestic adverse-event data reports of the ministry of health, labor, and Welfare in Japan. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. (2019) 2019:1643804. doi: 10.1155/2019/1643804

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Arai I, Harada Y, Koda H, Tsutani K, Motoo Y. Estimated incidence per population of adverse drug reactions to Kampo medicines from the Japanese adverse drug event report database (JADER). Trad Kampo Med. (2020) 7:3–16. doi: 10.1002/tkm2.1234

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: long COVID, brain fog, traditional medicine, comprehensive QOL, Kampo, saikokeishito (SAKT), kamikihito (KKT)

Citation: Ono R, Takayama S, Arita R, Ishizawa K, Kikuchi A, Abe M, Ohsawa M, Saito N, Kanno T, Onodera K and Ishii T (2025) Effectiveness of Japanese traditional medicine (Kamikihito and Saikokeishito) for treating long COVID: a prospective observational study. Front. Med. 12:1609812. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1609812

Received: 11 April 2025; Accepted: 26 May 2025;
Published: 21 July 2025.

Edited by:

Pathirage Kamal Perera, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka

Reviewed by:

Rolf Teschke, Hospital Hanau, Germany
Irma Rahayu Latarissa, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia

Copyright © 2025 Ono, Takayama, Arita, Ishizawa, Kikuchi, Abe, Ohsawa, Saito, Kanno, Onodera and Ishii. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Shin Takayama, c2hpbi50YWtheWFtYS5jNEB0b2hva3UuYWMuanA=

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share senior authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.