Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Med., 29 August 2025

Sec. Nephrology

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1621723

This article is part of the Research TopicTuberculosis and Immune RegulationView all 3 articles

Hepatic tuberculosis induced by rituximab treatment for C1q nephropathy with minimal change disease: a case report

  • 1Department of Digestive System, Shaoxing Second Hospital, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, Zhejiang, China
  • 2Department of Nephrology, Shaoxing Second Hospital, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China
  • 3Department of Functional Examination, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province Afflicted to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Background: Rituximab is widely used for autoimmune nephropathy. It depletes B cells, potentially increasing infection risk. Tuberculosis is a rare but severe complication of rituximab treatment. We report a case of liver tuberculosis in a patient with C1q nephropathy with Minimal Change Disease (MCD) treated with rituximab.

Case presentation: In March 2023, an 81-year-old male patient was admitted to Shaoxing Second Hospital with a 2-month history of bilateral lower extremity edema. He was diagnosed with C1q nephropathy with MCD through renal biopsy. After treatment with 2 g rituximab, his proteinuria was relieved. In October 2024, due to B-cell rebound, 0.5 g of rituximab was added. In December 2023, the patient visited our hospital due to a 7-day fever. Abdominal ultrasound revealed a non-uniform hypoechoic liver mass suspected to be an abscess. Empirical antibiotic treatment was ineffective and the condition worsened. A liver biopsy was immediately performed, and the pathology showed characteristic granulomatous inflammation and patchy coagulative necrosis. The patient was ultimately diagnosed with hepatic tuberculosis and received a 1-year anti-tuberculosis treatment, including rifampicin 450 mg qd, isoniazid 300 mg qd, pyrazinamide 1,500 mg qd, and ethambutol 1,000 mg qd. The patient’s temperature returned to normal and abdominal pain was relieved on the third day of treatment. Two months later, a follow-up ultrasound showed a reduction in the left lobe liver mass, and an 8-month CT scan showed complete disappearance of the mass. The patient is currently under follow-up.

Conclusion: Rituximab may be an effective treatment option for C1q nephropathy with MCD. Although the risk of infection with rituximab is relatively low, rare infections such as tuberculosis still need to be vigilant, especially in elderly or immunocompromised patients. Additionally, we recommend routine screening for latent tuberculosis in elderly patients with nephropathy and hypogammaglobulinemia before rituximab treatment.

1 Introduction

Rituximab, as a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting CD20 (1), has been widely used in the treatment of autoimmune kidney diseases such as minimal change disease (MCD), membranous nephropathy, lupus nephritis, and in kidney transplantation (2). It exerts its effect by depleting B cells, but this mechanism may also increase the risk of infection. Schachtner et al. reported that nephropathy patients previously treated with rituximab had higher risks of cytomegalovirus infection, BK virus nephropathy, and severe sepsis (3). Kamar et al. found 9.09% of renal transplant patients died from infections during rituximab treatment (4). Trivin et al. noted 79% of infections in rituximab-treated glomerular disease patients were bacterial, with pneumonia being the most common (5). Tuberculosis, an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, remains the leading cause of death from infectious diseases globally (6, 7). Tuberculosis represents a rare yet potentially devastating complication in patients undergoing Rituximab treatment, with only sporadic case reports available in the literature (8, 9). To date, it remains uncertain whether rituximab use is associated with an increased risk of tuberculosis. Some studies suggest that Rituximab may lead to the reactivation of latent tuberculosis in kidney disease patients (10, 11); however, the underlying mechanisms and the extent of this risk require further investigation. C1q nephropathy (C1q nephropathy) is a rare glomerular disease characterized by intense C1q deposition in the mesangial area as shown by immunofluorescence staining (12), and it is relatively uncommon in clinical practice. Here, we report a case of liver tuberculosis induced by Rituximab treatment for C1q nephropathy with MCD.

2 Case presentation

In March 2023, an 81-year-old male from a low-risk tuberculosis area, with no previous medical or tuberculosis history, was admitted to the Nephrology Department of our hospital due to recurrent bilateral lower extremity edema for 2 months. He had a 6-year history of hypertension and an 8-year history of type 2 diabetes. Upon admission, the physical examination showed a blood pressure of 141/85 mmHg, a body temperature of 37°C, and moderate bilateral lower extremity edema. Laboratory test results were as follows: urine protein: 4+, Urinary Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio (UACR) ≥ 300 mg/g, 24-h urinary protein (24UP) 4.93 g, albumin (ALB) 18.5 g/L, total cholesterol 10.04 mmol/L, calcium 1.88 mmol/L, serum creatinine (SCR) 71umol/L, hemoglobin (HB) 129 g/L. Tests for mycobacterium tuberculosis antibodies, tumor markers, antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), and immunofixation electrophoresis were all negative. An abdominal ultrasound revealed that both kidneys were of normal size and shape. Chest CT showed no abnormalities.

The patient was initially diagnosed with nephrotic syndrome and underwent a renal biopsy 3 days after hospital admission. Glomeruli: Light microscopy revealed two glomeruli, one of which was sclerotic. The non-sclerotic glomerulus showed mild focal mesangial proliferation. Electron microscopy demonstrated diffuse podocyte foot process fusion (>80%), segmental basement membrane thickening, and occasional electron-dense deposits in the mesangial areas. Tubulointerstitial: Mild non-specific changes were observed, including tubular epithelial degeneration, focal atrophy, minimal inflammatory cell infiltration, and interstitial fibrosis. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed the following results: IgM (+), C1q (2+), while all other immune complex deposits were negative. Based on the integration of clinical data, light microscopy findings, electron microscopy observations, and immunofluorescence examination, the pathological diagnosis was established as C1q nephropathy with MCD (Supplementary Figure 1). Given the patient’s advanced age, corticosteroid therapy was declined. Additionally, considering that C1q nephropathy typically exhibits a suboptimal response to corticosteroids, Rituximab monotherapy was selected as the treatment regimen (intravenous infusions of 1 g were administered at the 2nd and 4th weeks after admission). Prior to the first and second infusions, the total B cells (CD20+) were 15.5 and 1.8%, respectively. In mid-May, a follow-up measurement revealed CD20 + levels had decreased to 0%. In October 2023, CD20 + was 5.7%, while the 24UP was recorded at 0.3 g. In light of the patient’s remission of proteinuria but the observed rebound in CD20+, an additional dose of Rituximab 0.5 g was administered.

In December 2023, the patient was admitted to our hospital due to a seven-day history of persistent fever. The body temperature was 38.9°C, while all other vital signs were within normal limits. Laboratory findings revealed: white blood cell (WBC) 15.2 × 109/L, neutrophils 75.9%, lymphocytes 15.2%, c-reactive protein (CRP) 25 mg/L, urine protein 1+, 24UP 0.56 g, and ALB 33.5 g/L. Scr, Hb, and procalcitonin (PCT) levels were within normal ranges. Chest CT showed no abnormalities. Abdominal color Doppler ultrasound identified a non-uniform hypoechoic mass measuring 37 × 30 × 32 mm in the medial segment of the left liver lobe. Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT confirmed an irregularly shaped lesion with heterogeneous enhancement in the left lobe of the liver (Supplementary Figure 2).

We suspected it to be liver abscess and upgraded the treatment from 3-day course of piperacillin-tazobactam (4.5 g IV q8d) to meropenem (1 g IV q8d). However, within the following 5 days, the patient’s condition gradually deteriorated, presenting with persistent high fever and abdominal pain, indicating that the simple anti-infective treatment was ineffective. Laboratory re-evaluation revealed a significant deterioration in inflammatory markers. Concurrently, the tuberculin-specific T-cell spot (T-SPOT) test for tuberculosis infection returned positive, whereas serological tests and blood cultures for amoebic infection remained negative, raising the suspicion of tuberculosis. To clarify the diagnosis, a liver biopsy was performed on the ninth day following admission, which demonstrated the presence of characteristic granulomatous inflammatory morphology along with patchy coagulative necrosis (Supplementary Figure 3).

The patient was eventually diagnosed with hepatic tuberculosis and received one-year anti-tuberculosis treatment (rifampicin 450 mg qd, isoniazid 300 mg qd, pyrazinamide 1,500 mg qd, ethambutol 1,000 mg qd). After the anti-tuberculosis treatment began, the patient’s body temperature returned to normal on the third day and abdominal pain was relieved. Two months later, the ultrasound re-examination indicated that the mass in the left lobe of the liver had decreased (13*11 mm), and 8 months later, the CT re-examination showed that the mass had completely disappeared (Supplementary Figure 2). Currently, the patient has stopped the anti-tuberculosis and biological agent treatments. During the treatment period, no adverse drug reactions such as liver function or optic nerve function abnormalities occurred, and regular clinical follow-ups are being conducted. In addition, Supplementary Figure 4 illustrates the timeline of diagnosis and treatment.

3 Discussion and conclusion

Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD20, is widely utilized in the treatment of various autoimmune diseases (1). While its adverse effects are generally regarded as mild (13), there has been growing concern in recent years regarding its potential association with infectious complications. The precise mechanisms underlying rituximab-induced infections remain incompletely understood. First, rituximab induces prolonged B-cell depletion, leading to reduced antibody production, particularly after repeated dosing, which may result in hypogammaglobulinemia and increase the risk of infection (14). A study in pediatric patients demonstrated that low IgG levels following rituximab treatment were associated with an elevated risk of severe infections, with some patients developing persistent hypogammaglobulinemia (15). Second, rituximab may disrupt the balance of T-cell subsets, impairing cellular immune function and thereby compromising the body’s defense against pathogens (16). Additionally, rituximab may cause delayed neutropenia, further affecting innate immune responses. While some patients may spontaneously recover neutrophil counts, this effect may lead to severe infections, especially in elderly individuals and those with renal failure (17).

The issue of whether rituximab induces reactivation of tuberculosis remains controversial. The Rituximab Consensus Expert Committee and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Working Group, among others, do not recommend latent tuberculosis screening prior to treatment with CD19- or CD20-targeted monoclonal antibodies (18, 19). In a single-center retrospective analysis, no significant association was observed between rituximab use and tuberculosis or other infections in 56 renal transplant recipients compared to 287 non-recipients (20). A retrospective cohort study involving 60 patients treated with Rituximab for rheumatic diseases indicated that rituximab may be considered as a first-line therapy even in populations at risk for tuberculosis reactivation, particularly in regions with high tuberculosis prevalence and incidence (21). However, scattered case reports describe tuberculosis reactivation in rituximab-treated patients, especially those with a history of prior tuberculosis infection (10). These findings highlight the need for continued vigilance regarding this potential risk. In this case, hepatic tuberculosis developed nine months after Rituximab treatment, an occurrence not previously reported in the literature. Prior to initiating Rituximab therapy, a preliminary infectious disease screening was performed, with no evidence of tuberculosis infection detected. Nevertheless, hepatic tuberculosis emerged following the third administration of Rituximab (cumulative dose of 2.5 g). Serial monitoring of IgG levels revealed a progressive decline, indicative of hypogammaglobulinemia developing during Rituximab treatment. Furthermore, patients with nephrotic syndrome may experience a decrease in protein levels due to hypoproteinemia, which could further enhance the immunosuppressive effect of rituximab. Therefore, the onset of hepatic tuberculosis may be attributed to the compromised immune function commonly observed in elderly patients, compounded by hypogammaglobulinemia induced by Rituximab therapy.

Hepatic tuberculosis represents a rare form of tuberculosis and is typically categorized as extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Despite its varied imaging characteristics, the nonspecific nature of these findings frequently leads to misdiagnosis as other liver pathologies, such as hepatic abscesses or malignancies (22). On imaging studies, hepatic tuberculosis may manifest as multiple small nodular lesions, often associated with central calcifications, bile duct dilation, intrahepatic bile duct stenosis, and liver lobe atrophy (23). While imaging plays a critical role in identifying hepatic tuberculosis lesions, definitive diagnosis relies on pathological examination, particularly confirmation via tissue biopsy (22). Liver biopsy can reveal caseous necrosis and the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which are essential for establishing a diagnosis of hepatic tuberculosis. In this case, we initially detected a liver lesion through imaging examinations. However, empirical anti-infection treatment was ineffective. Eventually, a tissue biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of liver tuberculosis. It is worth noting that this patient has been continuously receiving RTX treatment, and there is no evidence of pulmonary tuberculosis infection either before or after the diagnosis. Therefore, we believe that the liver tuberculosis is directly related to the RTX treatment and do not consider the reactivation of tuberculosis outside the lungs. For treatment, we followed the WHO guidelines on managing Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Anti-tuberculosis drug dosages for elderly patients should consider age, weight, liver and kidney function, and underlying conditions (24). This patient weighed 60 kg, and the administered doses—rifampicin 450 mg/day, isoniazid 300 mg/day, pyrazinamide 1,500 mg/day, and ethambutol 1,000 mg/day—were all within the adult recommended ranges. No significant adverse effects were observed, so no dose adjustments were made. The 12-month four-drug regimen was selected based on two key factors. First, the patient had hepatic tuberculosis, a form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, combined with immunosuppression caused by rituximab therapy (resulting in B-cell depletion and hypogammaglobulinemia). Guidelines recommend longer treatment for such cases to reduce recurrence risk. Second, quadruple therapy is the first-line approach, offering broad coverage and synergistic bactericidal effects (25). The patient’s condition improved steadily: the liver mass reduced after 2 months and disappeared completely after 8 months, confirming the effectiveness of the treatment plan. In conclusion, this case involved an elderly patient with C1Q nephropathy, immunosuppression, and liver tuberculosis. After 1 year of four-drug combination therapy, the patient showed favorable outcomes, likely due to early, timely, and adequate anti-tuberculosis treatment.

In 1982, Jones first documented the pathological features of C1q nephropathy (26). In 1985, Jenette and Hipp formally introduced the concept of C1q nephropathy and established its diagnostic criteria (27): diffuse high-intensity C1q deposition in the glomerular mesangial region with an immunofluorescence intensity score of ≥ 2+, while excluding type I membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, hepatitis B virus-associated glomerulonephritis, and lupus nephritis. Studies have reported that the prevalence of C1q nephropathy is approximately 2.1–6% among pediatric and adult patients undergoing renal biopsy (28, 29), 0.2–2.5% among patients presenting with nephrotic syndrome and persistent proteinuria (27, 30), and 16.5% among adult patients (31). C1q nephropathy has heterogeneous pathological features that can be divided into three main types based on histopathology (32): MCD, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), and immune-mediated proliferative glomerulonephritis. In this case, light microscopy and electron microscopy of the renal biopsy demonstrated diffuse fusion (>80%) of podocyte foot processes with microvillous transformation. Immunofluorescence revealed diffuse C1q (++) deposition in the mesangial area along with IgM deposition. No hypocomplementemia was observed, and serological tests for ANA, ANCA, and hepatitis B virus were negative. These findings support a diagnosis of C1q nephropathy, with renal histology consistent with MCD. The clinical significance and pathological mechanism of C1q deposition in C1q nephropathy have not been fully elucidated: As an initiating component of the classical complement pathway, the deposition in the mesangial area may be related to the binding of IgG and IgM in immune complexes to C1q receptors on mesangial cells after activation of the complement system (3336). This case’s IgM deposition supports this view, but the mechanism of selective binding of immune complexes is unclear; C1q can bind to polyanionic substances, suggesting that DNA viral infection may be involved in the pathogenesis (37, 38); some studies suggest that the deposition of C1q in minimal change nephropathy may be related to the non-specific trapping of increased plasma proteins in the mesangium (30); the fusion of podocyte foot processes suggests that it may be involved in the pathogenesis. At present, there is a lack of high-quality evidence for effective treatment options for C1q nephropathy. For all patients, glucocorticoids are the initial treatment. Although it is prone to dependence or resistance, the clinical remission rate is approximately 77% (39). For patients who are dependent or resistant to hormones, immunosuppressants such as cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus can be combined. Multiple reports have shown that children with MCD who are treated with prednisone alone are prone to recurrence, dependence, or resistance (40, 41). Combining calcineurin inhibitors can lead to long-term remission and stable renal function (41). In this case, the elderly patient refused hormones and immunosuppressants, and rituximab (375 mg/m2 per week, for 4 weeks) was selected, which is consistent with the treatment effect of steroid-dependent cases reported in the literature (42, 43).

In conclusion, rituximab may represent a promising therapeutic option for C1q nephropathy with minor changes. However, an increasing number of case reports highlight that, despite its relatively low infection risk, rituximab use may still be associated with rare infections such as tuberculosis, particularly in elderly patients and those with compromised immune function. Furthermore, this case does not provide sufficient evidence to support routine screening for latent tuberculosis infection in all patients receiving rituximab therapy. Nevertheless, latent tuberculosis infection screening may be considered appropriate for elderly patients with hypogammaglobulinemia.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Medical Ethics Committee of Shaoxing Second Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. The manuscript presents research on animals that do not require ethical approval for their study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

HW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. FJ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. XL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Zhejiang Medical and Health Science and Technology Program (No. 2025KY1729) and the Zhejiang Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Project (No. 2025ZX283).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1621723/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Zhang, B, Li, Y, Xu, W, Peng, B, and Yuan, G. Use of rituximab after orbital decompression surgery in two grave's ophthalmopathy patients progressing to optic neuropathy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2020) 11:583565. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.583565

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Barbour, SJ, Ronco, P, Praga, M, Fervenza, FC, Induruwage, D, Zhu, B, et al. Predicting remission in anti-PLA2R antibody-associated membranous nephropathy: a secondary analysis of the GEMRITUX, MENTOR and STARMEN trials. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2025) 20:854–865. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000694

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Schachtner, T, Stein, M, and Reinke, P. ABO desensitization affects cellular immunity and infection control after renal transplantation. Transpl Int. (2015) 28:1179–94. doi: 10.1111/tri.12616

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kamar, N, Milioto, O, Puissant-Lubrano, B, Esposito, L, Pierre, MC, Mohamed, AO, et al. Incidence and predictive factors for infectious disease after rituximab therapy in kidney-transplant patients. Am J Transplant. (2010) 10:89–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02785.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Trivin, C, Tran, A, Moulin, B, Choukroun, G, Gatault, P, Courivaud, C, et al. Infectious complications of a rituximab-based immunosuppressive regimen in patients with glomerular disease. Clin Kidney J. (2017) 10:461–9. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfw101

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Ning, H, Wang, L, Zhou, J, Lu, Y, Kang, J, Ding, T, et al. Recombinant BCG with bacterial signaling molecule cyclic di-AMP as endogenous adjuvant induces elevated immune responses after mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Front Immunol. (2019) 10:1519. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01519

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Plourde, AR, Hall, CR, and McElvania, E. The brief case: a real pain in the testicle-a case of extrapulmonary mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. (2022) 60:e60221. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00602-21

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Cooray, S, Zhang, H, Breen, R, Carr-White, G, Howard, R, Cuadrado, M, et al. Cerebral tuberculosis in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus following cyclophosphamide treatment: a case report. Lupus. (2018) 27:670–5. doi: 10.1177/0961203317722849

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Ulusoy, H, Acar Cakan, O, and Tuna, T. Tuberculosis arthritis in the wrist while using rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis treatment. Open Access Rheumatol. (2020) 12:203–6. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S268852

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Sohal, R, Sohal, S, Wazir, A, and Lee, M. Rituximab-associated reactivation of tuberculosis. Am J Ther. (2020) 29:e113–5. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001257

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Gulleroglu, K, Baskin, E, Moray, G, Ozdemir, H, Arslan, H, and Haberal, M. Rituximab therapy and infection risk in pediatric renal transplant patients. Exp Clin Transplant. (2016) 14:172–5. doi: 10.6002/ect.2014.0156

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Vizjak, A, Ferluga, D, Rozic, M, Hvala, A, Lindic, J, Levart, TK, et al. Pathology, clinical presentations, and outcomes of C1q nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2008) 19:2237–44. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007080929

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Davila Saldana, BJ, John, T, Bonifant, C, Buchbinder, D, Chandra, S, Chandrakasan, S, et al. High risk of relapsed disease in patients with NK/T-cell chronic active Epstein-Barr virus disease outside of Asia. Blood Adv. (2022) 6:452–9. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005291

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Barmettler, S, Ong, M, Farmer, JR, Choi, H, and Walter, J. Association of immunoglobulin levels, infectious risk, and mortality with rituximab and hypogammaglobulinemia. JAMA Netw Open. (2018) 1:e184169. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4169

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Labrosse, R, Barmettler, S, Derfalvi, B, Blincoe, A, Cros, G, Lacombe-Barrios, J, et al. Rituximab-induced hypogammaglobulinemia and infection risk in pediatric patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2021) 148:523–532.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.03.041

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. McCoy, AN, Kim, DS, Gillespie, EF, Atkins, SJ, Smith, TJ, and Douglas, RS. Rituximab (Rituxan) therapy for severe thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy diminishes IGF-1R(+) T cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2014) 99:E1294–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3207

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Watanabe, K, Shimada, N, Kanzaki, M, Fukuoka, K, and Asano, K. Late-onset neutropenia after rituximab treatment for MPO-ANCA-associated Vasculitis. Intern Med. (2025) 64:581–4. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3357-23

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Buch, MH, Smolen, JS, Betteridge, N, Breedveld, FC, Burmester, G, Dorner, T, et al. Updated consensus statement on the use of rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. (2011) 70:909–20. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.144998

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Cantini, F, Nannini, C, Niccoli, L, Petrone, L, Ippolito, G, and Goletti, D. Risk of tuberculosis reactivation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis receiving non-anti-TNF-targeted biologics. Mediat Inflamm. (2017) 2017:8909834. doi: 10.1155/2017/8909834

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Chandrashekhar, P, Kaul, A, Bhaduaria, D, Prasad, N, Behera, M, Kushwaha, R, et al. Risk of tuberculosis among renal transplant recipients receiving rituximab therapy. Transpl Infect Dis. (2022) 24:e13963. doi: 10.1111/tid.13963

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Al Nokhatha, S, AlKindi, F, Alfalasi, M, Abdelsalhen, M, AlKhyeli, F, and Alsaber, AR. Prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection among rheumatology patients and management practices in the united arab emirates: A Single-Center retrospective cohort study. Cureus. (2023) 15:e50581. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50581

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Kakkar, C, Polnaya, AM, Koteshwara, P, Smiti, S, Rajagopal, KV, and Arora, A. Hepatic tuberculosis: a multimodality imaging review. Insights Imaging. (2015) 6:647–58. doi: 10.1007/s13244-015-0440-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Ch'Ng, LS, Amzar, H, Ghazali, KC, and Siam, F. Imaging appearances of hepatic tuberculosis: experience with 12 patients. Clin Radiol. (2018) 73:321.e11–6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.10.016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. WHO. Consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis: Module 4: treatment – Tuberculosis care and support [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization. (2022).

Google Scholar

25. Hickey, AJ, Gounder, L, Moosa, MS, and Drain, PK. A systematic review of hepatic tuberculosis with considerations in human immunodeficiency virus co-infection. BMC Infect Dis. (2015) 15:209. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-0944-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Jones, E, and Magil, A. Nonsystemic mesangiopathic glomerulonephritis with "full house" immunofluorescence. Pathological and clinical observation in five patients. Am J Clin Pathol. (1982) 78:29–34. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/78.1.29

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Jennette, JC, and Hipp, CG. C1q nephropathy: a distinct pathologic entity usually causing nephrotic syndrome. Am J Kidney Dis. (1985) 6:103–10. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(85)80150-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Lau, KK, Gaber, LW, Delos Santos, NM, and Wyatt, RJ. C1q nephropathy: features at presentation and outcome. Pediatr Nephrol. (2005) 20:744–9. doi: 10.1007/s00467-004-1810-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Nishida, M, Kawakatsu, H, Okumura, Y, and Hamaoka, K. C1q nephropathy with asymptomatic urine abnormalities. Pediatr Nephrol. (2005) 20:1669–70. doi: 10.1007/s00467-005-2024-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Markowitz, GS, Schwimmer, JA, Stokes, MB, Nasr, S, Seigle, RL, Valeri, AM, et al. C1q nephropathy: a variant of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Kidney Int. (2003) 64:1232–40. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00218.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Iskandar, SS, Browning, MC, and Lorentz, WB. C1q nephropathy: a pediatric clinicopathologic study. Am J Kidney Dis. (1991) 18:459–65. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80114-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Wenderfer, SE, Swinford, RD, and Braun, MC. C1q nephropathy in the pediatric population: pathology and pathogenesis. Pediatr Nephrol. (2010) 25:1385–96. doi: 10.1007/s00467-009-1429-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Li, X, Liu, J, Zhao, Y, Xu, N, Lv, E, and Ci, C. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 ameliorates lupus nephritis through inhibiting the NF-κB and MAPK signalling pathways in MRL/lpr mice. BMC Nephrol. (2022) 23:243. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02870-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Varyani, UT, Shah, NM, Shah, PR, Kute, VB, Balwani, MR, and Trivedi, HL. C1q nephropathy in a patient of neurofibromatosis type 1: a rare case report. Indian J Nephrol. (2019) 29:125–7. doi: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_353_17

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Sharman, A, Furness, P, and Feehally, J. Distinguishing C1q nephropathy from lupus nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2004) 19:1420–6. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh139

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Roberti, I, Baqi, N, Vyas, S, and Kim, DU. A single-center study of C1q nephropathy in children. Pediatr Nephrol. (2009) 24:77–82. doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-0939-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Devasahayam, J, Erode-Singaravelu, G, Bhat, Z, Oliver, T, Chandran, A, Zeng, X, et al. C1q nephropathy: the unique underrecognized pathological entity. Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). (2015) 2015:490413. doi: 10.1155/2015/490413

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Isaac, J, and Shihab, FS. De novo C1q nephropathy in the renal allograft of a kidney pancreas transplant recipient: BK virus-induced nephropathy? Nephron Clin Pract. (2002) 92:431–6. doi: 10.1159/000063313

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Kim, K, Son, H, Ryu, J, Lee, H, Han, SH, Ryu, D, et al. C1q nephropathy in adults is a form of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in terms of clinical characteristics. PLoS One. (2019) 14:e215217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215217

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Wong, CS, Fink, CA, Baechle, J, Harris, AA, Staples, AO, and Brandt, JR. C1q nephropathy and minimal change nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. (2009) 24:761–7. doi: 10.1007/s00467-008-1058-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Gunasekara, VN, Sebire, NJ, and Tullus, K. C1q nephropathy in children: clinical characteristics and outcome. Pediatr Nephrol. (2014) 29:407–13. doi: 10.1007/s00467-013-2692-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Ma, R, Wu, D, He, Z, Chang, Q, and Yang, Y. Case report: complete remission of c1q nephropathy treated with a single low-dose rituximab, a reality or coincidence? Front Pediatr. (2020) 8:568773. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.568773

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Ramachandran, R, Bharati, J, and Jha, V. Successful treatment of C1q nephropathy with CD19 targeted rituximab therapy. Nephrology (Carlton). (2017) 22:265. doi: 10.1111/nep.12757

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: hepatic tuberculosis, rituximab, C1q nephropathy, minimal change disease, case

Citation: Wang H, Huang Y, Jin F and Liu X (2025) Hepatic tuberculosis induced by rituximab treatment for C1q nephropathy with minimal change disease: a case report. Front. Med. 12:1621723. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1621723

Received: 01 May 2025; Accepted: 15 August 2025;
Published: 29 August 2025.

Edited by:

Sudeep Kumar Maurya, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States

Reviewed by:

Xuancheng Zhou, Southwest Medical University, China
Ricardo Silvariño, Universidad de la República, Uruguay
Hui Juan Zhou, Tongji University, China

Copyright © 2025 Wang, Huang, Jin and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Huifang Wang, d2hmNjM1NjEwMjBAMTYzLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.