Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med., 05 November 2025

Sec. Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1637954

First-trimester choroid plexus-to-head ratio: a novel sonographic marker for the early detection of fetal central nervous system malformations

Xianghua Xue,&#x;Xianghua Xue1,2Peng Tu,&#x;Peng Tu1,2Xiaohang Zhang,Xiaohang Zhang1,2Suzhen Ran,Suzhen Ran1,2Xuemei Zhang,
Xuemei Zhang1,2*
  • 1Department of Ultrasound, Women and Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
  • 2Department of Ultrasound, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China

Background: Prenatal diagnosis of nervous system malformations associated with the abnormal development of cerebrospinal fluid is most commonly made in the mid-trimester. During early gestation, the choroid plexus is the dominant structure occupying the lateral ventricles. Detection of abnormally positioned choroid plexuses within the fetal head may serve as a novel sonographic marker for the early identification of these malformations.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of singleton pregnancies with nervous system abnormalities. In the first trimester, the choroid plexus area (CPA), choroid plexus length (CPL), occipitofrontal diameter (OFD), head area (HA), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and the distance between the anterior margin of the choroid plexus (CP) and the medial side of the frontal bone (CFD) were measured in the transventricular axial plane. The ratios of CPA/HA, CPL/OFD, CFD/OFD, and HC/AC were also assessed.

Results: A total of 256 fetuses were included in the control group, and a reference range was established. In total, 52 cases with nervous system abnormalities associated with abnormal cerebrospinal fluid development were confirmed. In the control group, the ratios of CPA/HA and CPL/OFD decreased (r = −0.499, −0.216, respectively, both p < 0.001), while the CFD/OFD ratio increased (r = 0.445, p < 0.001). Compared with the control group, scatter diagrams and box-and-whiskers plots showed ventriculomegaly (VM) fetuses had significantly decreased CPA/HA and CPL/OFD ratios (p < 0.001), but increased CFD/OFD and HC/AC ratios (p < 0.001). The CPA/HA, CPL/OFD, and CFD/OFD ratios were all significantly higher in fetuses with open spina bifida (OSB) (p < 0.05). Fetuses with microcephaly showed a significantly higher CPA/HA ratio (p < 0.001), higher CPL/OFD ratio (p < 0.001), and lower HC/AC ratio (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Choroid-plexus-to-head ratios offer an objective means of assessing nervous system malformations associated with abnormal cerebrospinal fluid development during the first trimester.

Background

To identify early fetal brain abnormalities, such as alobar holoprosencephaly and open brain deformity, the integrity of the fetal cranium and falx cerebri is examined using transventricular axial plane scanning at 11–13 weeks’ gestation. In addition, the choroid plexus (CP) and lateral ventricles are among the most easily observed structures during the period (13). The CPs play an important role in the proliferation of neural stem cells and the regulation of brain development (4). Prenatal diagnosis of nervous system malformations associated with abnormal development of cerebrospinal fluid is most commonly made in the mid-trimester (5, 6). The assessment of choroid-plexus-to-head ratios in the first trimester may provide new insights into the development of these diseases. However, during early and middle pregnancy, the CPs predominantly occupy the lateral ventricles. Moreover, the diagnostic criteria for nervous system abnormalities associated with abnormal cerebrospinal fluid development, such as ventriculomegaly (VM), open spina bifida (OSB), and microcephaly in the first trimester, vary considerably.

The identification of contracted CPs may prompt suspicion of ventricular dilatation and trigger further evaluation of other defects associated with aneuploidies (7, 8). As correctly noted, VM in the majority of cases represents an indirect sign of other central nervous system malformations or pathological conditions, whereas isolated VM is not considered a true malformation. First-trimester prediction of VM using choroid plexus to lateral ventricle ratios appears promising (9). Considering the time for genetic examination and prenatal management, it is imperative to investigate independent indicators in the first trimester for nervous system malformations associated with abnormal cerebrospinal fluid development.

This study had two main objectives: first, to establish normal distributions for a range of choroid-plexus-to-head measurements; and second, to evaluate these measurements in different types of nervous system malformations associated with abnormal cerebrospinal fluid development and compare them with the normal group.

Methods

Study participants

This retrospective study focused on singleton pregnancies with nervous system abnormalities associated with abnormal cerebrospinal fluid development after 16 weeks’ gestation in our center, spanning from June 2017 to June 2023, using first-trimester ultrasound imaging. A total of 108,941 fetuses underwent routine first-trimester ultrasound examination in the center during 11–14 weeks’ gestation. All cases were determined through a comprehensive search of the medical information database. Our center is an academic tertiary referral medical unit, where routine first-trimester screening is also offered to low-risk pregnant women.

Inclusion criteria for the normal group: (1) fetal crown-rump length (CRL) range: 45–84 mm; (2) low-risk pregnancy, with no history of anemia, hypertension, heart disease, smoking, or drinking; (3) normal neurological development assessment of the newborn within 1 year after birth. Exclusion criteria included: (1) incomplete prenatal data and lack of follow-up results; (2) severe brain malformations, such as alobar holoprosencephaly, Dandy–Walker malformation, or agenesis of the corpus callosum; and (3) fetuses with other structural or genetic syndromes.

Nervous system abnormalities associated with abnormal cerebrospinal fluid development, including isolated VM, OSB, and microcephaly, were enrolled in the abnormal group. VM was further classified as mild when the atrial width was 10–15 mm and severe when it was ≥15 mm (2, 10). Microcephaly was defined as mild when the head circumference was below 2–3 standard deviations (SD) from the mean, and severe when it was more than 3 SD below the mean (11, 12). All abnormal fetuses underwent at least one ultrasound scan in the early stage, with complete follow-up data available for mid- and late pregnancy. Exclusion criteria included: (1) unclear image quality due to maternal obesity or unfavorable fetal position, (2) VM secondary to intracranial hemorrhage or infection in mid- or late pregnancy, and (3) fetuses with other intracranial structural malformations. All included fetuses were confirmed either prenatally or postnatally (including after the termination of pregnancy) by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or autopsy.

Gestational age was determined based on the last menstrual period and confirmed by the CRL measurement. As this study involved a retrospective review of patient data, ethical approval was not needed, and all pregnant women provided informed consent for early pregnancy ultrasound examination.

Ultrasound examinations

Ultrasound measurements were conducted using the Voluson E8/E10 system (GE Medical Systems, Zipf, Austria) or Samsung WS80A (Samsung Medison, Seoul, South Korea). Nuchal translucency (NT) and CRL (measured in mm) values were measured in the mid-sagittal plane. The standard measurement in the transthalamic plane has been reported (2): (1) Ultrasonic beam scanned through the temporal window, which means the falx cerebri was nearly perpendicular to the acoustic beam. (2) The integrity of bony contours, a separate choroid plexus (butterfly sign), and falx cerebri were clearly presented. (3) Images were enlarged to 1/2–1/3 of the screen (Figure 1A).

Figure 1
Diagram showing three panels labeled A, B, and C. Panel A depicts two oval shapes with dotted outlines and a diagonal white line. Panel B shows the same shapes with three orange measurement lines labeled

Figure 1. Illustration of the standard axial butterfly plane in the first trimester of the brain in a normal fetus. (A) Measurement of the choroid plexus and head areas by a dashed line. (B) Measurement of the occipitofrontal diameter (OFD) and the vertical distance from the apex of the CP to the medial side of the frontal bone (CFD). (C) Measurement of choroid plexus length (CPL) and CFD. The “a and b” mean CFD. The “c” means OFD. The “d and e” mean CPL.

For the choroid plexus area (CPA), head area (HA), head circumference (HC), and abdominal circumference (AC) are measured using the tracing method along their perimeter. Two lines are drawn separately through the apex of the CP perpendicular to the falx cerebri. The distance between the two lines is defined as the choroid plexus length (CPL), and the vertical distance from the apex of the CP to the medial side of the frontal bone is defined as CFD. The “outer-to-outer” method was used to measure the CPL and occipitofrontal diameter (OFD), the “outer-to-inner” method was used to measure the CFD, which were both at the level of the choroid plexus (Figures 1, 2). Importantly, in order to minimize errors caused by the inconsistent morphology of the choroid plexus on both sides, the CPL = (left choroid plexus length + right choroid plexus length)/2 and the CPA = (left choroid plexus area + right choroid plexus area). The ratios of choroid-plexus-to-head were assessed, including the ratios of CPA/HA, CPL/OFD, CFD/OFD, and HC/AC.

Figure 2
Diagram and ultrasound images illustrating three brain conditions: VM, OSB, and Microcephaly. Panels A, B, and C show graphical representations with triangular and asterisk markers. Panels D, E, and F display corresponding ultrasound images, with the same markers highlighting specific regions.

Figure 2. Illustration and two-dimensional view of the standard axial butterfly plane in fetus with nervous system abnormalities. (A,D) Fetus with ventriculomegaly (VM). (B,E) Fetus with open spina bifida (OSB). (C,F) Fetus with microcephaly. ▲, the lateral ventricles; ✽, the choroid plexus.

All ultrasound examinations in the first trimester and the diagnosis for abnormal cases were made by two experienced physicians (X.H.Z. and X.M.Z.). All parameters were measured offline by two researchers (X.X.H. and P.T.), blinded to the clinical diagnosis, and an average of two measurements was taken.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by the software SPSS Statistical for Windows version 17.0 and GraphPad Prism 4. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The normality of continuous variables was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed variables or as median (interquartile range, IQR) for non-normally distributed variables. Meanwhile, categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages. In 20 normal fetuses, repeatability was assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intra- and interobserver reliability and utilizing the Bland–Altman method at different gestational ages. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to demonstrate the correlation between each parameter and CRL.

The normal and abnormal groups were screened in an approximate 5:1 ratio. Simple random sampling was applied to ensure comparability between groups. A 90% prediction interval (5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles) around the regression line was estimated based on the relationship to CRL. Box-and-whisker plots were also constructed according to the type of pathology. Comparison of quantitative variables was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to evaluate predictive performance, and variables with an area under the curve (AUC) < 0.5 were excluded from subsequent analyses.

Results

Normal fetuses and reference ranges

A total of 256 singleton normal fetuses were included in the control group analysis (Figure 3), and a reference range was established for each parameter. There was good intra- and inter-observer reliability (ICC > 75%) for all measurements (Table 1). Bland–Altman plots are presented in Supplementary Figures S1, S2. The difference in pregnancy characteristics and parameters is summarized in Table 2. As indicated, there was no significant difference between the control group and abnormal groups with respect to maternal age (p = 0.29) and CRL (p = 0.97). However, the NT was found significantly lower in the control group (p < 0.05).

Figure 3
Flowchart detailing a study from June 2017 to June 2023 with 108,941 fetuses. Outlining a selection process for cases with non-lethal nervous system abnormalities, 64 were categorized as abnormal. Exclusions totaled 12, primarily due to severe conditions. Ultimately, 52 pathological cases were identified, consisting of isolated VM (24 cases), OSB (17 cases), and microcephaly (11 cases). A control group comprised 256 normal cases, selected with a 5:1 ratio. Exclusion criteria for normals included incomplete data and severe malformations.

Figure 3. Flowchart for patient selection. VM, ventriculomegaly; OSB, open spina bifida.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Intra-and interobserver reliability of measurements for parameters in choroid-plexus-to-head section in first trimester.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Baseline characteristics and ultrasound measurements in cases with nervous system abnormalities compared with controls.

Reference ranges based on CRL for CPA/HA, CPL/OFD, CFD/OFD, and HC/AC were constructed. Bivariate correlation analysis revealed no significant correlation between HC/AC and CRL (r = 0.09, p = 0.142). The ratios of CPA/HA and CPL/OFD decreased with fetal CRL, CPA/HA ratio = −0.002315 × CRL + 0.4627 (r = −0.499, p < 0.001); CPL/OFD ratio = −0.001112 × CRL + 0.6081 (r = −0.216, p < 0.001). However, the CFD/OFD ratio increased with fetal CRL, CFD/OFD ratio = 0.001646 × CRL − 0.01485 (r = 0.445, p < 0.001) (Figure 4).

Figure 4
Four scatter plots labeled (a) to (d) show different ratios versus CRL (crown-rump length) with data points categorized by normal, VM, OSB, and microcephaly conditions. Plot (a) presents CPA/HA ratio, (b) CPL/OFD ratio, (c) CFD/OFD ratio, and (d) HC/AC ratio. Each plot has a trend line and points are represented by various symbols corresponding to the conditions.

Figure 4. Parameters of the choroid-plexus-to-head section in relation to fetal crown-rump length (CRL) in the reference group and in fetuses with nervous system abnormalities. Fetuses with ventriculomegaly (n = 24, clear square), open spina bifida (n = 17, dark triangle), and microcephaly (n = 11, clear rhomboid) plotted against the calculated reference range (5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles). CPA, choroid plexus area; HA, head area; CPL, choroid plexus length; OFD, occipitofrontal diameter; CFD, the vertical distance from the apex of the CP to the medial side of the frontal bone; HC, head circumference; AC, abdominal circumference; VM, ventriculomegaly; OSB, open spina bifida.

Pathological cases

In total, 64 fetuses with nervous system abnormalities associated with the abnormal development of cerebrospinal fluid were included in the abnormal group. Five fetuses with VM were excluded during the follow-up period, including four cases with intracranial hemorrhage and one case with infection. Additionally, seven cases with OSB were detected, and severe VM cases were also excluded. Finally, 52 cases were confirmed, including 24 fetuses with isolated VM, 17 fetuses with OSB, and 11 fetuses with microcephaly. In order to present the individual values in pathological cases, we compared associated parameters with normal reference ranges (Figure 4) and median (IQR) values of variables (Figure 5).

Figure 5
Box-and-whisker plots compare four conditions: Normal, VM, OSB, and Microcephaly. (a) CPA/HA ratio, (b) CPL/OFD ratio, (c) CFD/OFD ratio, (d) HC/AC ratio. Significant differences are marked with asterisks, while 'ns' indicates non-significance. Ratios vary among conditions, with notable differences highlighted between groups.

Figure 5. Ratios of choroid plexus to head of fetuses with nervous system abnormalities compared with controls. CPA, choroid plexus area; HA, head area; CPL, choroid plexus length; OFD, occipitofrontal diameter; CFD, the vertical distance from the apex of the CP to the medial side of the frontal bone; HC, head circumference; AC, abdominal circumference; VM, ventriculomegaly; OSB, open spina bifida. Statistical significance was performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. ns, no significance, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

A total of 8/24 (33.3%) cases in the fetuses with VM had CPA/HA ratio < 5th centile, 9/24 (37.5%) cases had CPL/OFD ratio < 5th centile, all 24/24 (100%) cases had CFD/OFD ratio > 95th centile, and 9/24 (37.5%) cases had HC/AC ratio > 95th centile. When compared with the control group, fetuses with VM had a significantly decreased CPA/HA and CPL/OFD ratio (p < 0.001), an increased CFD/OFD and HC/AC ratio (p < 0.001).

The proportion of CPA/HA ratio, CPL/OFD ratio, and CFD/OFD ratio above the 95th centile was 52.9% (9/17), 35.3% (6/17), and 52.9% (9/17), respectively, in fetuses with OSB. A total of 4/17 (23.5%) fetuses had abnormalities in the HC/AC ratio, including two cases with an HC/AC ratio > 95th centile and two cases with an HC/AC ratio < 5th centile. Both CPA/HA, CPL/OFD, and CFD/OFD ratios were significantly higher in the OSB group when compared with normal fetuses (p < 0.05); meanwhile, the HC/AC ratio showed no significant difference between fetuses with OSB and unaffected fetuses (p > 0.05).

A total of 10/11 (90.9%) cases in the fetuses with microcephaly had CPA/HA ratio > 95th centile, 6/11 (54.5%) cases had CPL/OFD ratio > 95th centile, and 7/11 (63.6%) cases had HC/AC ratio < 5th centile. A total of 2/11 (18.2%) cases had abnormalities in the CFD/OFD ratio, including one case with a CFD/OFD ratio > 95th centile and one case with a CFD/OFD ratio < 5th. Fetuses with microcephaly showed a significantly higher CPA/HA ratio (p < 0.001), higher CPL/OFD ratio (p < 0.001), and lower HC/AC ratio (p < 0.05); the difference in CFD/OFD ratio did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05) (Figure 6).

Figure 6
Three medical imaging panels labeled A, B, and C. Panel A shows an ultrasound with two asterisks and two triangular markers highlighting specific regions. Panel B and C are MRI scans with yellow arrows pointing to distinct areas within the brain structure. Each panel is marked with a small locator image indicating the scan slice orientation.

Figure 6. Ultrasound and MR images of a fetus with microcephaly at early and mid-gestation. (A) Ultrasound images at early gestation. (B,C) MR images at mid-gestation. ▲, the lateral ventricles; ✽, the choroid plexus; ⟶, abnormal cranial morphology.

ROC curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance within each anomaly group (Figures 79). The combined index yielded a higher AUC than the individual parameters, indicating enhanced predictive efficiency. The AUC values were 0.995 (95% CI: 0.990–1.000), 0.937 (95% CI: 0.868–1.000), and 0.952 (95% CI: 0.868–1.000) across the respective anomaly groups (Table 3).

Figure 7
ROC curves graph for ventriculomegaly diagnosis with sensitivity on the y-axis and one minus specificity on the x-axis. Five curves are shown: CPA/HA in blue, CPL/OFD in green, CFD/OFD in black, HC/AC in purple, and a composite index in orange, compared to a red reference line.

Figure 7. ROC curves for ventriculomegaly. CPA, choroid plexus area; HA, head area; CPL, choroid plexus length; OFD, occipitofrontal diameter; CFD, the vertical distance from the apex of the CP to the medial side of the frontal bone; HC, head circumference; AC, abdominal circumference.

Figure 8
ROC curves for Open spina bifida are shown with different colored lines representing CPA/HA, CPL/OFD, CFD/OFD, and HC/AC. The orange line is a composite index, and the red line is the reference line. The curves illustrate varying sensitivity and 1-specificity.

Figure 8. ROC curves for open spina bifida. CPA, choroid plexus area; HA, head area; CPL, choroid plexus length; OFD, occipitofrontal diameter; CFD, the vertical distance from the apex of the CP to the medial side of the frontal bone; HC, head circumference; AC, abdominal circumference.

Figure 9
ROC curves for microcephaly, plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity. The graph includes multiple curves: blue for CPA/HA, green for CPL/OFD, black for CFD/OFD, orange for HC/AC, purple for Composite index, and red for the Reference line. The curves visually compare different diagnostic metrics.

Figure 9. ROC curves for microcephaly. CPA, choroid plexus area; HA, head area; CPL, choroid plexus length; OFD, occipitofrontal diameter; CFD, the vertical distance from the apex of the CP to the medial side of the frontal bone; HC, head circumference; AC, abdominal circumference.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Results of ROC curve analysis for individual and composite index.

Discussion

Unlike other non-lethal brain anomalies, such as posterior fossa malformations and corpus callosal anomalies, the fetuses included in our study were characterized by abnormal cerebrospinal fluid development. Based on the experience of our center and reports from previous studies, we found that the boundary of the lateral ventricle was unclear in the case group. Therefore, parameter measurements of the choroid plexus and head were obtained in the axial plane of the fetal head during first-trimester screening (5).

Reference range in normal fetuses

To minimize the subjectivity of the measurements, we designed two new reference lines perpendicular to the falx cerebri through the apex of CPs to measure the CFD and CPL. CFD is a novel parameter that has not been measured in previous studies and may quantify the degree of choroid retrocontraction. Prasad et al. demonstrated that the CPA/HA and CPL/lateral ventricular length (VL) ratios were good predictors of severe VM with AUCs of 0.90 and 0.87, respectively (9). More importantly, we compared the CPL/OFD and CPA/HA ratios in normal fetuses for the first time, all of which were obtained at the level of the choroid plexus.

In the subsequent analysis, we investigated the correlation between each parameter and CRL. The results indicated that, as CRL increased, the CPA/HA and CPL/OFD ratio in normal fetuses showed linear decreases, while the CFD/OFD ratio increased, indicating the development of fetal CPs and the lateral ventricle. Based on this premise, the 5th and 95th percentile curves for each index were plotted. This provided a relatively objective foundation for identifying pathological cases, which had not been delineated in previous reports.

Pathological cases

Manegold-Brauer et al. evaluated a sonographic approach to classify first-trimester VM associated with further sonographic anomalies (13). They found that the ratios between CP and lateral ventricle diameter (PDVDR), CP and lateral ventricle length (PLVLR), and CP and lateral ventricle area (PAVAR) were below the 5th percentile in 82.4, 94.1, and 94.1% of VM cases, respectively. Genetic examination of these fetuses revealed karyotype abnormality in 52.9% of cases. In view of the significant impact of cerebrospinal fluid circulation-related disorders on the lateral ventricle, we replaced the lateral ventricle parameters with head parameters, which have rarely been reported in previous studies. In fetuses with isolated VM in our cohort, the CPA/HA and CPL/OFD ratios were significantly decreased, whereas the CFD/OFD and HC/AC ratios were increased, consistent with the findings of Manegold-Brauer et al. Notably, our results intuitively indicated a significant increase in the CFD/OFD ratio in all fetuses with VM, suggesting that “CPs staying in a significant backward state” may be a crucial clue for isolating VM. ROC curve analysis further confirmed this novel observation, demonstrating that the combination of CFD/OFD with the HC/AC ratio provided superior diagnostic performance, with both sensitivity and specificity at higher levels.

Cerebral ventriculomegaly from mid-trimester is often observed in the fetus with OSB (14). On the contrary, the appearance of a “dry brain” in the first trimester can be easily visualized, which is associated with sustained reduced cerebrospinal fluid, downward movement of the cerebellum, and stenosis of the midbrain aqueduct (15). The diameter of the brainstem (BS) and BS–occipital bone distance (BSOB) were measured on the sagittal plane, and the BS/BSOB ratio was calculated to predict the presence of OSB (16, 17). Increased fetal choroid-plexus-to-head-size ratio is a new sign for the easy detection of OSB in the first trimester in recent studies (5, 18). In our findings, the combined CPA/HA, CPL/OFD, and CFD/OFD ratios objectively represented a reduction in cerebrospinal fluid and contraction of the lateral ventricle. The combination of the CPA/HA, CPL/OFD, and CFD/OFD ratios provided superior diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 94.1% and a specificity of 85.2%. Interestingly, the scatterplot indicates that the proportions of these three diagnostic criteria above the 95th centile were only 52.9, 35.3, and 52.9%, respectively. Therefore, it is evident that not all lateral ventricle areas are decreased in fetuses with OSB, particularly at early gestation. It is suggested that relying solely on subjective signs of “dry brain” may lead to a missed diagnosis of OSB.

Intrauterine infection, aneuploidy, and environmental exposure may serve as pathogenic factors for microcephaly (19, 20). Fetal microcephaly may constitute the initial phenotypic manifestation of genetic abnormalities or may be indicative of neurological malformation. The prognosis of microcephaly varies significantly depending on its underlying causes and severity (11). In our cohort, 90.9% of fetuses with microcephaly had a CPA/HA ratio > 95th centile, and 54.5% had a CPL/OFD ratio > 95th centile. Superior diagnostic performance was achieved by combining the CPA/HA, CPL/OFD ratios, with a sensitivity of 90.9% and a specificity of 98.4%, suggesting that timely evaluation using three-dimensional multiplanar imaging of cranial anatomy should be conducted after 16 weeks, when CPA/HA and CPL/OFD increase in the early stage. Furthermore, MRI, genetic testing, and intrauterine infection-related examinations would be warranted.

Clinical implications

Ratios commonly used for the early evaluation of posterior fossa anomalies, such as the brainstem/occipital bone ratio (BS/OB), brainstem-to-occipital bone ratio (BS/BSOB), and intracranial translucency (IT), may be subject to potential confounding interpretations. These markers are known to vary with gestational age and crown–rump length (CRL) (21, 22). Furthermore, cutoff thresholds (e.g., 95th percentile) are not standardized across studies, and significant inter-study heterogeneity has been highlighted in systematic reviews (23). Therefore, although these ratios provide valuable diagnostic clues for early screening, they should be interpreted with caution.

Based on our findings, we recommend that the relevant parameters should be measured in doubtful cases during early pregnancy: (1) abnormal location of the CPs, such as staying in a significant “backward” or “suspension” state; (2) choroid-plexus-to-head disproportion, including the choroid plexus fills the entire lateral ventricle or the proportion is too small. Based on previous studies, we have for the first time quantitatively analyzed the state of the choroid plexus in the intracranial cavity of fetuses with nervous system abnormalities associated with abnormal cerebrospinal fluid development at early gestation. These ratios (e.g., CPA/HA, CPL/OFD, and CFD/OFD ratios) may also have potential for incorporation into AI-driven triage systems and structured reporting frameworks. Such applications could minimize inter-observer variability and promote consistency in early screening, although their clinical utility requires confirmation in larger, multicenter cohorts.

This study has several limitations that warrant consideration. First, the number of abnormal cases was relatively small, and some subcohorts included only a limited number of cases. This inevitably reduces statistical power and precludes robust subgroup conclusions, consistent with previous reports highlighting small series as a common challenge in prenatal imaging research (24, 25). Consequently, our subgroup findings should be regarded as exploratory and interpreted with caution. Another limitation is that it was conducted in a single-center setting with an ethnically homogenous cohort, which has been highlighted in previous studies (26). Therefore, the applicability of our results to more diverse populations should be interpreted with caution.

Conclusion

Assessing choroid-plexus-to-head ratios in the first trimester appears promising for identifying nervous system malformations associated with abnormal cerebrospinal fluid development.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Women and Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University/Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

XX: Writing – review & editing, Formal analysis, Data curation. PT: Investigation, Writing – original draft. XiZ: Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Investigation. SR: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Supervision. XuZ: Methodology, Supervision, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Chongqing Science and Health Joint Medical Research Major Project (Grant Number: 2024DBXM006).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1637954/full#supplementary-material

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE S1 | Bland–Altman plots showing mean difference and 95% limits of agreement between paired measurements of the parameters in the choroid-plexus-to-head section by the same observer (intra-observer). CPA, choroid plexus area; HA, head area; CPL, choroid plexus length; OFD, occipitofrontal diameter; CFD, the vertical distance from the apex of the CP to the medial side of the frontal bone; HC, head circumference; AC, abdominal circumference.

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE S2 | Bland–Altman plots showing mean difference and 95% limits of agreement between paired measurements of the parameters in the choroid-plexus-to-head section by two different observers (inter-observer). CPA, choroid plexus area; HA, head area; CPL, choroid plexus length; OFD, occipitofrontal diameter; CFD, the vertical distance from the apex of the CP to the medial side of the frontal bone; HC, head circumference; AC, abdominal circumference.

References

1. Sepulveda, W, and Wong, AE. First trimester screening for holoprosencephaly with choroid plexus morphology ('butterfly' sign) and biparietal diameter. Prenat Diagn. (2013) 33:1233–7. doi: 10.1002/pd.4235

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Malinger, G, Paladini, D, Haratz, KK, Monteagudo, A, Pilu, GL, and Timor-Tritsch, IE. ISUOG practice guidelines (updated): sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system. Part 1: performance of screening examination and indications for targeted neurosonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2020) 56:476–84. doi: 10.1002/uog.22145

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Harper, LM, Wood, SL, Jenkins, SM, Owen, J, and Biggio, JR. The performance of first-trimester anatomy scan: a decision analysis. Am J Perinatol. (2016) 33:957–65. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1579652

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kalafat, E, Ting, L, Thilaganathan, B, Papageorghiou, AT, and Khalil, A. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal choroid plexus length to head biometry ratio at 11 to 13 weeks for open spina bifida. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2021) 224:294.e1–294.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.058

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Chaoui, R, Benoit, B, Entezami, M, Frenzel, W, Heling, KS, Ladendorf, B, et al. Ratio of fetal choroid plexus to head size: simple sonographic marker of open spina bifida at 11-13 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2020) 55:81–6. doi: 10.1002/uog.20856

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Toi, A, Lister, WS, and Fong, KW. How early are fetal cerebral sulci visible at prenatal ultrasound and what is the normal pattern of early fetal sulcal development? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2004) 24:706–15. doi: 10.1002/uog.1802

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Goetzinger, KR, Stamilio, DM, Dicke, JM, Macones, GA, and Odibo, AO. Evaluating the incidence and likelihood ratios for chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with common central nervous system malformations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2008) 199:285.e1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.100

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Loureiro, T, Ushakov, F, Maiz, N, Montenegro, N, and Nicolaides, KH. Lateral ventricles in fetuses with aneuploidies at 11-13 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2012) 40:282–7. doi: 10.1002/uog.11197

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Prasad, S, Di Fabrizio, C, Eltaweel, N, Kalafat, E, and Khalil, A. First-trimester choroid-plexus-to-lateral-ventricle disproportion and prediction of subsequent ventriculomegaly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2023) 62:234–40. doi: 10.1002/uog.26189

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Scala, C, Familiari, A, Pinas, A, Papageorghiou, AT, Bhide, A, Thilaganathan, B, et al. Perinatal and long-term outcomes in fetuses diagnosed with isolated unilateral ventriculomegaly: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2017) 49:450–9. doi: 10.1002/uog.15943

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. De Bie, I, and Boucoiran, I. No. 380-investigation and management of prenatally identified microcephaly. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. (2019) 41:855–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.10.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Graf, WD, Le Pichon, JB, Bittel, DC, Abdelmoity, AT, and Yu, AS. Practice parameter: evaluation of the child with microcephaly (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. (2010) 74:1080–1081. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181d5e077

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Manegold-Brauer, G, Oseledchyk, A, Floeck, A, Berg, C, Gembruch, U, and Geipel, A. Approach to the sonographic evaluation of fetal ventriculomegaly at 11 to 14 weeks gestation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2016) 16:3. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0797-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Bahlmann, F, Reinhard, I, Schramm, T, Geipel, A, Gembruch, U, von Kaisenberg, CS, et al. Cranial and cerebral signs in the diagnosis of spina bifida between 18 and 22 weeks of gestation: a German multicentre study. Prenat Diagn. (2015) 35:228–35. doi: 10.1002/pd.4524

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Lachmann, R, Picciarelli, G, Moratalla, J, Greene, N, and Nicolaides, KH. Frontomaxillary facial angle in fetuses with spina bifida at 11-13 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. (2010) 36:268–71. doi: 10.1002/uog.7718

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Wertaschnigg, D, Ramkrishna, J, Ganesan, S, Tse, C, Scheier, M, Volpe, N, et al. Cranial sonographic markers of fetal open spina bifida at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation. Prenat Diagn. (2020) 40:365–72. doi: 10.1002/pd.5614

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Lachmann, R, Chaoui, R, Moratalla, J, Picciarelli, G, and Nicolaides, KH. Posterior brain in fetuses with open spina bifida at 11 to 13 weeks. Prenat Diagn. (2011) 31:103–6. doi: 10.1002/pd.2632

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Volpe, N, Bovino, A, Di Pasquo, E, Corno, E, Taverna, M, Valentini, B, et al. First-trimester ultrasound of the cerebral lateral ventricles in fetuses with open spina bifida: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. (2024) 6:101445. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101445

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Levine, D, Jani, JC, Castro-Aragon, I, and Cannie, M. How does imaging of congenital Zika compare with imaging of other TORCH infections? Radiology. (2017) 285:744–61. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171238

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Picone, O, Vauloup-Fellous, C, Cordier, AG, Guitton, S, Senat, MV, Fuchs, F, et al. A series of 238 cytomegalovirus primary infections during pregnancy: description and outcome. Prenat Diagn. (2013) 33:751–8. doi: 10.1002/pd.4118

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Chen, FC, Gerhardt, J, Entezami, M, Chaoui, R, and Henrich, W. Detection of spina bifida by first trimester screening - results of the prospective multicenter Berlin IT-study. Früherkennung einer spina bifida im Ersttrimester-screening – Ergebnisse der prospektiven, multizentrischen Berliner IT-Studie. Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany: 1980). (2017) 38:151–7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1399483

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Zhu, X, Zhao, S, Yang, X, Feng, Q, Zhang, X, Yang, F, et al. First-trimester cranial ultrasound markers of open spina bifida. J Ultrasound Med. (2021) 40:1155–62. doi: 10.1002/jum.15496

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Sirico, A, Raffone, A, Lanzone, A, Saccone, G, Travaglino, A, Sarno, L, et al. First trimester detection of fetal open spina bifida using BS/BSOB ratio. Arch Gynecol Obstet. (2020) 301:333–40. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05422-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Eric Ozdemir, M, Demirci, O, Ayvaci Tasan, H, Ohanoglu, K, and Akalin, M. The importance of first trimester screening of cranial posterior fossa in predicting posterior fossa malformations which may be identified in the following weeks of gestation. J Clin Ultrasound. (2021) 49:958–62. doi: 10.1002/jcu.23057

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Volpe, N, Dall'Asta, A, Di Pasquo, E, Frusca, T, and Ghi, T. First-trimester fetal neurosonography: technique and diagnostic potential. Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol. (2021) 57:204–14. doi: 10.1002/uog.23149

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Syngelaki, A, Hammami, A, Bower, S, Zidere, V, Akolekar, R, and Nicolaides, KH. Diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities on routine ultrasound examination at 11-13 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol. (2019) 54:468–76. doi: 10.1002/uog.20844

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Glossary

VM - Ventriculomegaly

OSB - Open spina bifida

CPA - Choroid plexus area

CPL - Choroid plexus length

OFD - Occipitofrontal diameter

HA - Head area

HC - Head circumference

AC - Abdominal circumference

CP - Choroid plexus

CFD - the vertical distance from the apex of the CP to the medial side of the frontal bone

CRL - Crown-rump length

SD - Standard deviation

MRI - Magnetic resonance imaging

NT - Nuchal translucency

IQR - Interquartile range

ICCs - Intraclass correlation coefficients

VL - Ventricular length

PDVDR - The ratio between CP and lateral ventricle diameter

PLVLR - The CP and lateral ventricle length

PAVAR - The CP and lateral ventricle area

BS - Brainstem

BSOB - BS–occipital bone distance

Keywords: prenatal diagnosis, choroid plexus, head, nervous system malformations, first trimester

Citation: Xue X, Tu P, Zhang X, Ran S and Zhang X (2025) First-trimester choroid plexus-to-head ratio: a novel sonographic marker for the early detection of fetal central nervous system malformations. Front. Med. 12:1637954. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1637954

Received: 30 May 2025; Accepted: 09 October 2025;
Published: 05 November 2025.

Edited by:

Ermelinda De Meo, University College London, United Kingdom

Reviewed by:

Tanvir Kabir Chowdhury, Chittagong Medical College, Bangladesh
Amit Bajpai, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India

Copyright © 2025 Xue, Tu, Zhang, Ran and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xuemei Zhang, c3dpbnRlcnM3ODlAMTYzLmNvbQ==

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.