Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Med., 05 January 2026

Sec. Nephrology

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1707350

Baseline intact fibroblast growth factor 23 and risk of kidney disease progression in the Indian Chronic Kidney Disease cohort: a prospective multicenter study

Kajal Kamboj&#x;Kajal Kamboj1Ashok Kumar Yadav&#x;Ashok Kumar Yadav1Aman RastogiAman Rastogi2Arpita GhoshArpita Ghosh2Shubham SharmaShubham Sharma3Love JainLove Jain3Vivek KumarVivek Kumar3Vivekanand Jha,,
 Indian Chronic Kidney Disease Study NetworkVivekanand Jha2,4,5* Indian Chronic Kidney Disease Study Network
  • 1Department of Experimental Medicine and Biotechnology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
  • 2The George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India
  • 3Department of Nephrology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
  • 4School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
  • 5Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India

Background: Circulating levels of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) increase early in chronic kidney disease and are associated with a faster progression and increased mortality. However, evidence from South Asia is limited. We investigated the association between baseline intact FGF23 levels and adverse kidney outcomes in the ICKD cohort.

Methods: A prospective cohort of adult participants with mild to moderate CKD enrolled at 11 Indian hospitals was included if baseline FGF-23 levels were available. Plasma iFGF-23 was measured using a two-site ELISA. The primary endpoint was major adverse kidney events (MAKE: a composite of kidney failure, ≥50% decline in eGFR, or kidney death). Secondary endpoints included individual MAKE components, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations between iFGF23 and time-to-event outcomes.

Results: A total of 602 participants were followed up for a median duration of 5.3 years. MAKE developed in 266 (49.3%) participants; 223 (41.3%) progressed to kidney failure; 211 (43.5%) reached ≥50% eGFR decline; and 66 (11.0%) died. iFGF23 was significantly associated with MAKE (SHR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02–1.47, p = 0.027), kidney failure (SHR 1.28, 95% CI 1.04–1.58, p = 0.02), and all-cause mortality (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.05–1.83, p = 0.02) in unadjusted and age- and sex-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. However, in the fully adjusted model with clinical variables, none of the associations remained statistically significant.

Conclusion: In this prospective cohort of Indian CKD patients, iFGF23 levels did not provide independent prognostic information after accounting for established risk factors. Routine iFGF23 testing has limited incremental prognostic value in this setting.

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major global public health issue. An important consequence of CKD is disordered phosphate handling and the consequent changes in mineral metabolism (1). Recognition of the central role of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23), primarily secreted by osteocytes, has been a key advance in understanding mineral metabolism abnormalities and their consequences for health in people with CKD (2, 3). Circulating FGF23 levels increase early during CKD and promote phosphaturia, which serves as an adaptive mechanism. However, it also suppresses 1-α-hydroxylase activity, reducing calcitriol (3, 4).

Observational studies and clinical trials have shown an association between raised FGF-23 and mortality, heart failure, and CKD progression in multiple cohorts (58). The Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study showed FGF23 was a stronger predictor of mortality than established cardiovascular risk factors (5). Similarly, the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study found that higher baseline FGF23 levels predicted kidney failure over a 21-year follow-up period (9). However, evidence from lower-middle-income countries, including South Asia, is limited. The Indian Chronic Kidney Disease (ICKD) study (10, 11) represents the largest prospective cohort of CKD patients in LMICs and shows characteristics different from Western populations, such as distinct etiologies of CKD, a younger age at presentation, and unique socioeconomic factors. The mineral metabolism abnormalities are more severe (higher phosphate, PTH, and FGF23 levels and low calcium) in the diabetic CKD population in the CRIC cohort (12). In addition, dietary and ethnic factors can influence FGF23 levels in the CKD population (13, 14). Given these differences and established ethnic variations in mineral metabolism, validation of biomarker associations in diverse populations is crucial.

We evaluated whether baseline intact FGF-23 (iFGF-23) predicts kidney disease progression in the Indian Chronic Kidney Disease (ICKD) cohort.

Materials and methods

The ICKD study is a multicenter, prospective cohort study recruiting patients with mild to moderate CKD from 11 large hospitals across India. Eligible participants were adults aged 18–75 years with eGFR 15–60 mL/min/1.73m2 or eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73m2 with proteinuria >500 mg/day. For this analysis, we included a subset of ICKD cohort participants randomly selected for FGF23 testing, who were enrolled between the study initiation and March 2020. We excluded individuals lacking iFGF23 measurement, those without follow-up, or those with missing covariates required for the adjustment models. ICKD was approved by ethics committees at participating centers, and all participants gave written informed consent.

Plasma iFGF-23 was measured at baseline using a two-site ELISA (Immutopics, Inc., San Clemente, CA, Cat. 60-6500). The assay had intra-assay precision of 4.6%, inter-assay precision of 6.5%, and sensitivity of 1 pg/mL. All samples were processed according to the manufacturer’s specifications by trained laboratory personnel who were blinded to the clinical outcomes.

The primary endpoint was major adverse kidney events (MAKE), a composite of kidney failure (initiation of dialysis or transplantation), ≥50% decline in eGFR from baseline, or death due to kidney disease. Secondary endpoints included individual MAKE components, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. Outcome definitions were as per prespecified cohort protocols, confirmed by medical record review.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (25th, 75th percentiles) based on distribution. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages. iFGF23 was analyzed as a continuous variable after log transformation due to skewed distribution.

Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the associations between iFGF23 and time-to-event outcomes without competing risk, and the Fine-Grey sub-distribution hazard model to evaluate the association for outcomes including competing risk. Non-kidney death was treated as a competing risk for kidney outcomes, and non-cardiovascular death was the competing risk for CV deaths. Three sequential models were constructed: unadjusted, adjusted for age and sex, and a third one additionally adjusted for hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, baseline eGFR, and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio.

All analyses were performed using R version 4.4.2 statistical software, with two-sided p-values <0.05 considered significant.

Results

The study included 602 participants, with a mean age of 47.6 ± 12.4 years, and 64% were men (Table 1). The median eGFR was 43.0 (IQR 36–55) mL/min/1.73m2. Hypertension was present in 507 (84%) participants, diabetes in 165 (27%), and cardiovascular disease in 78 (13%). The characteristics of the overall ICKD cohort and those included in the current study are shown in Supplementary Table S1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of participants.

The median baseline iFGF23 level was 112 (IQR 78–163) pg/mL. Women had significantly higher iFGF23 levels than men (125 vs. 104 pg/mL; p < 0.001). iFGF23 levels were inversely correlated with eGFR, with the highest levels observed in participants with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2 (median 157 pg/mL) compared to those with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73m2 (median 96 pg/mL, p < 0.001) (Supplementary Table S2).

During a follow-up of 5.3 ± 2.4 years, 266 (49.3%) experienced MAKE; 223 (41.3%) progressed to kidney failure; 211 (43.5%) reached ≥50% eGFR decline; and 66 (11.0%) died. Participants who developed MAKE had higher baseline iFGF23 levels than those who did not (median 121 vs. 103 pg/mL; p < 0.001). Similar patterns were observed for kidney failure (121 vs. 103 pg/mL, p < 0.001) and ≥50% eGFR decline (116 vs. 104 pg/mL, p = 0.002). No significant differences were observed for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Box plots A to E display iFGF-23 levels (picograms per milliliter) on the y-axis against different conditions on the x-axis. Plot A compares MAKE, B shows eGFR decline by fifty percent, C illustrates ESRD, D represents all-cause mortality, and E shows CVD mortality. Each plot has two groups:

Figure 1. Levels of iFGF23 based on outcome events. (A) MAKE, (B) ≥50% eGFR decline, (C) ESRD (kidney failure), (D) all-cause mortality, and (E) CVD mortality in ICKD cohort. MAKE, major adverse kidney events; ERKD, end stage renal disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; CVD, cardiovascular disease.

In unadjusted analysis, higher iFGF23 was significantly associated with increased risk of MAKE (SHR 1.57, 95% CI 1.23–1.99, p = 0.017), kidney failure (SHR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06–1.60, p = 0.013), and all-cause mortality (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.10–1.87, p = 0.008) but not with ≥50% eGFR decline or cardiovascular mortality.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Association of intact FGF-23 with outcomes.

After adjustment for age and sex (Model 2), the associations remained significant for MAKE (SHR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02–1.47, p = 0.027), kidney failure (SHR 1.28, 95% CI 1.04–1.58, p = 0.02), and all-cause mortality (SHR 1.39, 95% CI 1.05–1.83, p = 0.02). However, in the fully adjusted model (Model 3), none of the associations remained statistically significant. The sub-hazard ratios were substantially attenuated: MAKE (SHR 1.13, 95% CI 0.94–1.36, p = 0.19), kidney failure (SHR 1.11, 95% CI 0.90–1.37, p = 0.31), and all-cause mortality (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.93–2.34, p = 0.09) (Table 2).

Sensitivity analysis

When iFGF23 was dichotomized at the median (112 pg/mL), similar patterns were observed. Participants with above-median iFGF23 had increased risks of MAKE (SHR 1.57, 95% CI 1.23–1.99, p < 0.001), kidney failure (SHR 1.62, 95% CI 1.24–2.10, p < 0.001), and all-cause mortality (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.19–2.51, p = 0.004) in unadjusted models, and the associations remained significant after full adjustment for MAKE: SHR 1.44, 95%CI;1.12; 1.85, p = 0.005 and kidney failure: SHR 1.36, 95% CI 1.03–1.79, p = 0.032 but not for all-cause mortality: HR 1.41, 95% CI 0.96–2.08, p = 0.08 (Supplementary Table S3).

Discussion

In this analysis of the ICKD cohort, we found that iFGF23 was associated with adverse kidney outcomes in univariate and minimally adjusted models, but these associations were not independent of established CKD risk factors after full adjustment. This contrasts with findings from several Western cohorts, such as CRIC (5, 8) and ARIC (9), where FGF23 has been identified as an independent predictor of outcomes even after comprehensive adjustment. The MMKD study also found that FGF23 is an independent predictor of CKD progression (6). The HOST study reported an independent association of FGF23 with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and initiation of chronic dialysis in the early advanced stage of CKD (15). However, the CARE FOR HOMe study revealed a more nuanced association, with FGF23 being linked to future decompensated heart failure but not to incident atherosclerotic events in stage 2–4 CKD (16).

Possible reasons for these differences include differences in population characteristics. Our cohort had a lower median age than typical Western CKD cohorts. Younger patients may have different underlying pathophysiology and risk profiles that modify the prognostic utility of FGF23. The differences in CKD etiology (a higher proportion of CKDu and CIN and a lower proportion of DN) (11) may indicate distinct mineral metabolism patterns compared to diabetic kidney disease, which predominates in Western cohorts. Finally, ethnic variations in mineral metabolism, dietary patterns, and genetic polymorphisms affecting FGF23 metabolism may influence its prognostic value.

From a clinical standpoint, our findings suggest that iFGF23 measurement may not provide additional prognostic information beyond standard clinical variables in Indian patients with CKD. This has implications for resource allocation and biomarker implementation in LMICs, where cost-effectiveness is a critical consideration. However, FGF23 may still have therapeutic implications, and interventional studies targeting FGF23 or its downstream effects could provide insights into causality and potential treatment targets, even if the biomarker itself has limited independent prognostic value.

Our study has several strengths—it is a large multicenter study with a prospective design, standardized outcome adjudication, and comprehensive covariate assessment. Limitations include a single baseline iFGF23 measurement, which precludes assessment of longitudinal changes, and a lack of data on medications that might influence FGF23 levels. Additionally, we did not assess the effects of phosphate or parathyroid hormone on FGF23, which may confound or modify the association between iFGF23 and outcome. Differences in the diet, baseline history of CVD, and causes of CKD between current cohort and entire ICKD cohort may also limit the generalizability of study findings.

To conclude, in this prospective cohort of Indian CKD patients, iFGF23 levels were associated with adverse kidney outcomes in univariate analysis but did not provide independent prognostic information beyond established clinical variables. Our study suggests that the clinical utility of iFGF23 as a prognostic biomarker may vary across populations and clinical contexts, emphasizing the importance of validating biomarkers across diverse populations before recommending widespread clinical adoption.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Institute Ethics Committee, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

KK: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft. AY: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AR: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. AG: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. SS: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. LJ: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. VK: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. VJ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was supported by the grant received by the Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi, India (Grant No. BT/PR11105/MED/30/1345/2014 and No. BT/PR36541/MED/30/2198/2020).

Group member of Indian Chronic Kidney Disease Network

Ajay Jaryal, Department of Nephrology, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, India; Asheesh Kumar Kapil, Department of Nephrology, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, India; Gopesh Modi, Samarpan Kidney Institute and Research Centre, Bhopal, India; Kaushik Bhattacharjee, Department of Nephrology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education & Research, Kolkata, India; N. Gopalakrishnan, Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai, India; Narayan Prasad, Department of Nephrology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Science, Lucknow, India; Manisha Sahay, Department of Nephrology, Osmania Medical College, Osmania General Hospital, Hyderabad, India; Sanjay Vikrant, Department of Nephrology, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, India; Santosh Varughese, Department of Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India; Sishir Gang, Department of Nephrology Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India; Sreejith Parameswaran, Department of Nephrology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Pondicherry, India; R. Sakthirajan, Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai, India; Seema Baid Agarwal, Department of Nephrology and Transplant Center, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Conflict of interest

VJ has received grant funding from GSK, Baxter Healthcare, and Biocon and honoraria from Bayer, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, NephroPlus and Zydus Cadilla, under the policy of all honoraria being paid to the organization.

The remaining author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author VJ that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1707350/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Ogata, H, Sugawara, H, Yamamoto, M, and Ito, H. Phosphate and coronary artery disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. J Atheroscler Thromb. (2024) 31:1–14. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV22012,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Courbebaisse, M, and Lanske, B. Biology of fibroblast growth factor 23: from physiology to pathology. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. (2018) 8:a031260. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a031260,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Isakova, T, Wahl, P, Vargas, GS, Gutierrez, OM, Scialla, J, Xie, H, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 is elevated before parathyroid hormone and phosphate in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. (2011) 79:1370–8. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.47,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Russo, D, and Battaglia, Y. Clinical significance of FGF-23 in patients with CKD. Int J Nephrol. (2011) 2011:364890. doi: 10.4061/2011/364890,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Edmonston, D, Wojdyla, D, Mehta, R, Cai, X, Lora, C, Cohen, D, et al. Single measurements of carboxy-terminal fibroblast growth factor 23 and clinical risk prediction of adverse outcomes in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. (2019) 74:771–81. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.05.026,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Fliser, D, Kollerits, B, Neyer, U, Ankerst, DP, Lhotta, K, Lingenhel, A, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) predicts progression of chronic kidney disease: the Mild to Moderate Kidney Disease (MMKD) study. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2007) 18:2600–8. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006080936

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Gutierrez, OM, Mannstadt, M, Isakova, T, Rauh-Hain, JA, Tamez, H, Shah, A, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and mortality among patients undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. (2008) 359:584–92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706130,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Isakova, T, Xie, H, Yang, W, Xie, D, Anderson, AH, Scialla, J, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and risks of mortality and end-stage renal disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. JAMA. (2011) 305:2432–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.826,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Rebholz, CM, Grams, ME, Coresh, J, Selvin, E, Inker, LA, Levey, AS, et al. Serum fibroblast growth factor-23 is associated with incident kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2015) 26:192–200. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014020218,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kumar, V, Yadav, AK, Gang, S, John, O, Modi, GK, Ojha, JP, et al. Indian Chronic Kidney Disease study: design and methods. Nephrology. (2017) 22:273–8. doi: 10.1111/nep.12789,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Kumar, V, Yadav, AK, Sethi, J, Ghosh, A, Sahay, M, Prasad, N, et al. The Indian Chronic Kidney Disease (ICKD) study: baseline characteristics. Clin Kidney J. (2022) 15:60–9. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab149,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Wahl, P, Xie, H, Scialla, J, Anderson, CA, Bellovich, K, Brecklin, C, et al. Earlier onset and greater severity of disordered mineral metabolism in diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Care. (2012) 35:994–1001. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2235,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Taskapan, H, Mahdavi, S, Bellasi, A, Martin, S, Kuvadia, S, Patel, A, et al. Ethnic and seasonal variations in FGF-23 and markers of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder. Clin Kidney J. (2024) 17:sfae188. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae188,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Zaheer, S, de Boer, IH, Allison, M, Brown, JM, Psaty, BM, Robinson-Cohen, C, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23, mineral metabolism, and adiposity in normal kidney function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2017) 102:1387–95. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-3563,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Kendrick, J, Cheung, AK, Kaufman, JS, Greene, T, Roberts, WL, Smits, G, et al. FGF-23 associates with death, cardiovascular events, and initiation of chronic dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2011) 22:1913–22. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010121224

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Seiler, S, Rogacev, KS, Roth, HJ, Shafein, P, Emrich, I, Neuhaus, S, et al. Associations of FGF-23 and sKlotho with cardiovascular outcomes among patients with CKD stages 2–4. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2014) 9:1049–58. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07870713,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: chronic kidney disease, CVD mortality, fibroblast growth factor 23, kidney failure, major adverse kidney events

Citation: Kamboj K, Yadav AK, Rastogi A, Ghosh A, Sharma S, Jain L, Kumar V, Jha V and Indian Chronic Kidney Disease Study Network (2026) Baseline intact fibroblast growth factor 23 and risk of kidney disease progression in the Indian Chronic Kidney Disease cohort: a prospective multicenter study. Front. Med. 12:1707350. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1707350

Received: 17 September 2025; Revised: 29 November 2025; Accepted: 02 December 2025;
Published: 05 January 2026.

Edited by:

Gaozhi Chen, Wenzhou Medical University, China

Reviewed by:

Tabo Sikaneta, Scarborough Health Network, Canada
Volha Vasilkova, Gomel State Medical University, Belarus

Copyright © 2026 Kamboj, Yadav, Rastogi, Ghosh, Sharma, Jain, Kumar, Jha and Indian Chronic Kidney Disease Study Network. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Vivekanand Jha, di5qaGFAaW1wZXJpYWwuYWMudWs=

These authors share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.