Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Med., 15 January 2026

Sec. Gene and Cell Therapy

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1728944

Current status and future prospects of nanocarrier-mediated miRNA delivery for osteoarthritis therapy

Longyin LiLongyin Li1Zhengguang XuZhengguang Xu2Feng GaoFeng Gao1Junjie Xu
Junjie Xu1*
  • 1Department of Joint Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Chaohu, China
  • 2School of Clinical Medicine, Jining Medical University, Jining, China

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common degenerative joint disease whose pathogenesis involves multiple pathways, including inflammatory responses, cartilage matrix metabolism, cell proliferation, and apoptosis. Currently, effective clinical treatments are lacking. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are associated with the pathogenesis of OA and represent potential therapeutic agents for this disease. However, issues such as miRNA instability, off-target effects, and low cellular uptake efficiency have limited their clinical application. Nanocarriers, which are widely used for targeted drug delivery, offer a convenient approach for miRNA-based OA therapy. Numerous studies have employed nanomaterials such as polymer-based, lipid-based, inorganic nanoparticles, and extracellular vesicles (EVs) to deliver miRNAs, effectively inhibiting the progression of OA and achieving therapeutic goals. This review summarizes research advances in the use of nanoparticles to deliver miRNAs for the treatment of OA, explores the associated clinical prospects and challenges, and proposes potential pathways toward intelligent, precise, and personalized therapy, with the aim of informing miRNA-mediated gene therapy for OA.

1 Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic, degenerative whole-joint disease that affects all joint tissues (1). Its pathological changes involve the cartilage, synovium, subchondral bone, menisci, ligaments, joint capsule, and periarticular adipose tissue, including the infrapatellar fat pad (24). OA causes significant pain, functional limitations, and a reduced quality of life (5). It ranks as the fourth leading cause of disability globally, affecting more than 500 million people worldwide. The prevalence of OA is projected to increase by 60–100% by 2050 (1, 3, 6). The major risk factors for OA include aging, female sex, obesity, a history of joint injury, abnormalities in joint alignment, and genetic as well as metabolic factors (7). Currently, OA treatment focuses primarily on alleviating pain symptoms, with no effective methods available to slow disease progression (8).

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous single-stranded RNAs approximately 22 nucleotides in length that play crucial roles in regulating cartilage homeostasis, inflammatory responses, and cell proliferation and apoptosis (9, 10). Delivering miRNAs for the treatment of OA has broad application prospects (11). However, owing to issues such as poor in vivo stability, weak tissue targeting, and low cellular uptake rates of miRNAs, direct delivery into the body diminishes therapeutic efficacy, severely limiting their application (1214). Therefore, it is necessary to construct a drug delivery system that can protect miRNAs, ensure targeted delivery, enhance their efficacy, and accelerate their clinical application (15).

In recent years, biologics and targeted therapies have emerged as novel treatment strategies for OA, including novel drug delivery systems (16, 17). Using nanomaterials as carriers for miRNA delivery leverages the inherent advantages of nanocarriers while effectively circumventing the inherent limitations of the miRNAs themselves (18, 19). Currently, various types of nanocarriers are used for the delivery of miRNA (20). In this narrative review, we summarize recent findings on miRNA delivery via nanoparticles for treating OA, explore the similarities and differences among various types of carriers, and outline future development directions and prospects for clinical translation, thereby providing a reference for subsequent research.

2 miRNA biogenesis

The biogenesis of miRNAs is not only essential for normal cellular processes, but is also closely associated with the onset and progression of various diseases (21). Understanding the miRNA biogenesis pathway and its intricate regulatory network has profound implications for elucidating the role of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of OA and exploring potential therapeutic targets. The biogenesis of miRNAs is a complex and precisely regulated multistep process that is divided mainly into the canonical pathway and the noncanonical pathway. The canonical miRNA biosynthetic pathway primarily originates from transcription by RNA polymerase II within the cell nucleus. The resulting primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) can extend to several thousand nucleotides in length and typically contains one or more hairpin structures (10). Pri-miRNAs are recognized and cleaved by the Drosha-DGCR8 complex within the nucleus to produce precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs). The newly generated pre-miRNA is actively transported out of the nuclear pore by Exportin-5 (XPO5) in a Ran-GTP-dependent manner (22). Once inside the cytoplasm, the Dicer enzyme and its cofactor TRBP cleave the pre-miRNA into small miRNA duplexes. These duplexes are loaded onto Argonaute (Ago) proteins, where one strand is retained as the guide strand to form the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), while the other passenger strand is removed or degraded (23). When the RISC hybridizes with target mRNA, it induces mRNA degradation or translation inhibition (24) (Figure 1). While most miRNAs are processed in this way, a small number of miRNAs bypass certain steps in the canonical pathway to be processed in a noncanonical manner (25, 26).

Figure 1
Diagram illustrating the miRNA biogenesis pathway. In the nucleus, miRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II to form pri-miRNA. Drosha and DGCR8 process pri-miRNA into pre-miRNA, which is exported to the cytoplasm by RAN-GTP and XPO-5. In the cytoplasm, Dicer cuts pre-miRNA, forming a miRNA duplex. This duplex associates with AGO and RISC complexes for either translational repression or mRNA cleavage.

Figure 1. Canonical miRNA biogenesis. Briefly, RNA polymerase II transcribes miRNA genes to produce pri-miRNA, which is cleaved into pre-miRNA by the Drosha-DGCR8 complex in the cell nucleus. They are then exported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm via Exportin-5 (XPO5). In the cytoplasm, they are further cleaved by the Dicer enzyme into RNA duplexes, where the guide strand is incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). The RISC guide complex targets mRNAs, leading to their degradation or translational repression.

3 Role of miRNAs in the development of osteoarthritis

In the normal joint microenvironment, the extracellular matrix (ECM) maintains a dynamic balance between synthesis and degradation, inflammation and anti-inflammation, apoptosis and proliferation, and various biological responses, collectively ensuring the homeostasis of joint structure and function (2729). The pathological core of OA lies in the disrupted homeostasis of anabolic and catabolic signaling networks within the joint (30). Among the numerous molecular mechanisms involved in this imbalance, miRNA-mediated post-transcriptional regulation has gradually attracted increasing attention (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The role of the selected miRNAs in the development of osteoarthritis.

3.1 miRNAs with protective roles in OA

Extensive research has indicated that certain miRNAs are significantly downregulated in the cartilage tissue of OA patients, thereby promoting disease progression. The overexpression of these miRNAs can protect against OA by regulating the biological functions of chondrocytes and immune cells (31, 32). For example, Lin et al. (33) fully confirmed through clinical samples and animal experiments that miR-653-5p inhibits the JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway by targeting and suppressing IL-6 expression. Inactivation of this pathway alleviates chondrocyte senescence by downregulating expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21 and p16INK4a, while simultaneously suppressing matrix metalloproteinase-13 (MMP13) and a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 5 (ADAMTS5), thereby significantly mitigating the progression of OA pathology. Research has revealed that miR-149 directly targets and suppresses VCAM-1 expression, thereby inhibiting the activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. The inactivation of this pathway reduces inflammation by downregulating NF-κB activity, regulates the balance between Bax and Bcl-2 to inhibit chondrocyte apoptosis, and promotes the synthesis of ECM components such as collagen II and aggrecan, thereby collectively alleviating OA. Moreover, upregulating miR-149 or inhibiting VCAM-1 in in vivo models can significantly improve the pathological manifestations of OA, suggesting that the miR-149/VCAM-1/PI3K/AKT axis may represent a potential therapeutic pathway for OA treatment (34). Lu et al. (35) reported that the expression of miR-22-3p is downregulated in OA, promoting disease progression, and they demonstrated through in vitro and in vivo experiments that miR-22-3p alleviates OA progression by inhibiting the expression of the inflammasome NLRP3. Additionally, bioinformatics analysis and dual luciferase reporter assays confirmed that HMGA1 is a target of miRNA-4701-5p. By targeting and suppressing HMGA1 expression, miRNA-4701-5p alleviates IL-1β-induced inflammatory damage, apoptosis, and cytotoxicity in chondrocytes (36). Another study reported that miR-214-3p directly targets IKKβ to inhibit the NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby reducing the expression of MMP3, MMP13, and the apoptotic executor protein cleaved-caspase-3, while concurrently elevating the levels of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2. This mechanism alleviates the degradation of the cartilage ECM and apoptosis; moreover, animal experiments have confirmed that intra-articular injection of miR-214-3p agonists can slow the progression of OA (37). Furthermore, miR-548d-5p, miR-485-3p, and miR-140-5p also promote chondrocyte proliferation and inhibit apoptosis (3841).

3.2 miRNAs with pathogenic roles in OA

In the pathological environment of OA, multiple miRNAs amplify inflammatory responses, promote chondrocyte senescence and apoptosis, thereby disrupting joint homeostasis and driving OA progression. For example, Liu et al. (42) reported that miR-33-5p targets and suppresses SIRT6, thereby leading to the upregulation of cell cycle–dependent kinase inhibitors such as p16 and p21 and a weakening of the inhibitory control over the NF-κB signaling pathway. These changes induce chondrocyte senescence, promote inflammation, and trigger cell cycle arrest, ultimately leading to cartilage degeneration and OA progression. This effect was further validated in animal experiments. Similarly, miR-5581 is upregulated in the cartilage tissue of OA patients. Bioinformatics prediction and dual luciferase reporter assays confirmed that its targeting reduces nuclear respiratory factor 1 protein levels, thereby inhibiting cell proliferation, promoting apoptosis, and disrupting ECM homeostasis (43). Tavallaee et al. (44) reported that miR-27b-3p is upregulated in OA, accelerating OA progression by promoting synovial fibrosis via the PPARG/ADAMTS8 axis. In addition, miR-128a exacerbates OA progression by targeting and suppressing nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 2 (NR1D2), leading to decreased expression of chondrogenic factors and reduced ECM synthesis, whereas cartilage-specific knockout of miR-128a can restore NR1D2 expression and significantly alleviate OA severity (45).

3.3 Dual-functioning miRNAs in the progression of osteoarthritis

Owing to the complex interaction networks between miRNAs and RNA, some miRNAs do not exert purely protective or inhibitory effects but instead exert differential influences on the progression of OA through distinct signaling pathways. For example, miR-18a-3p can target and inhibit PDP1, thereby reducing the expression of inflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases, improving cartilage matrix remodeling, and suppressing inflammatory responses (46). However, Ding et al. (47) reported that miR-18a-3p can suppress HOXA1 expression, leading to the upregulation of cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved PARP and the downregulation of BCL-2 expression. This promotes chondrocyte apoptosis and drives the pathological progression of OA. In addition, studies have shown that miR-146a-5p can simultaneously target and inhibit the expression of CXCR4 and NUMB, the former of which blocks SDF-1/CXCR4-mediated chondrocyte autophagy, thereby reducing cartilage degeneration and OA progression (48). Conversely, the latter promotes chondrocyte apoptosis and inhibits autophagy, consequently accelerating OA progression (49). In summary, the same miRNA may target different genes, which in turn have different effects on the progression of OA.

Notably, certain miRNAs exhibit consistent expression alteration patterns in both human OA and small animal OA models. For example, protective miRNAs such as miR-140-5p, miR-214-3p, and miR-548d-5p are downregulated in surgically induced OA joints of rodents (37, 38, 41). Conversely, disease-promoting miR-128a is upregulated in both human OA and rodent OA models, and its functional intervention can alter OA progression in animals (45). This suggests that the pathological roles of these miRNAs are conserved across species. Beyond rodent models, large animal OA models have gained increasing attention in miRNA research in recent years. Large animal joints more closely resemble human joints in terms of size, weight-bearing capacity, cartilage thickness, and natural disease progression, enabling better simulation of the physiological effects of miRNAs within the complex joint microenvironment (50). For example, in equine OA models, multiple studies have reported abnormal expression of miR-223, miR-199a-3p, miR-27b, and other related miRNAs in synovial fluid or extracellular vesicles, closely associated with inflammatory responses, cartilage matrix degradation, and synovial fibrosis (5153). miR-146a is upregulated in the synovial tissue of dogs with spontaneous OA and is likewise upregulated in early-stage human OA (54, 55), indicating a shared upregulation pattern that provides a valuable foundation for subsequent clinical translation. However, the trends of miRNA changes in large animals do not always align with those in humans. For instance, miR-146a is downregulated in late-stage human OA (54). Furthermore, taking miR-140-5p as an example: it is considered a protective miRNA in human OA with decreased expression in synovial fluid (40). In contrast, in equine OA models, researchers observed a significant increase in miR-140-5p within synovial fluid, accompanied by a decrease in plasma levels, and this phenomenon was interpreted as a compensatory protective response at the joint site against cartilage degradation (56).

4 Delivery of miRNAs for osteoarthritis therapy

The above findings indicate that miRNAs exert complex effects on the pathogenesis and progression of OA by regulating numerous biological processes, including cartilage degradation, inflammatory responses, cellular differentiation, and tissue homeostasis. These findings provide a robust foundation for employing specific modulation of their expression as a therapeutic approach for OA. In recent years, various nanomaterials have demonstrated potential applications as miRNA carriers in the treatment of OA (Figure 2; Tables 24).

Figure 2
Diagram showing different types of nanocarriers. It is divided into sections labeled polymer-based nanoparticles, inorganic-based nanoparticles, extracellular vesicle, and lipid-based nanoparticles. Each section contains illustrations of specific nanocarrier structures, with names like G5·AHP, ZIF-8, and Liposome surrounding the circle. The center reads

Figure 2. Nanocarriers for miRNA Delivery. miRNA nanocarriers for treating OA are primarily categorized into four types. The first type consists of polymer-based nanoparticles. The second type comprises extracellular vesicle delivery systems. The third type involves lipid-based nanoparticles. The fourth type utilizes inorganic nanoparticles.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Advantages and disadvantages of various nanocarriers and findings.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Nanocarriers for miRNA delivery.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Model types and induction approaches.

4.1 Extracellular vesicle delivery systems

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are cell-derived nanoparticles encapsulated by a lipid bilayer membrane that can encapsulate various bioactive substances, such as nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids (57). Exosomes are a subtype of EVs derived from the endosomal pathway that play a crucial role in intercellular communication and signal transduction (58, 59). EVs offer considerable potential for targeted delivery of miRNA therapies for OA owing to their inherent biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, and cytotoxicity (60). Liang et al. (61) fused cartilage-targeted peptides (CAPs) with lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein 2b on the surface of exosomes, achieving efficient encapsulation and specific delivery of miR-140, effectively alleviating cartilage degeneration and disease progression. Additional researchers have utilized CAP-modified exosomes derived from subcutaneous fat-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCsSC-Exos) to deliver miR-199a-3p, significantly enhancing the effect of cartilage repair (62). Furthermore, Liu et al. (63) constructed a dual-engineered EVs by loading exogenous miR-223 into human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived EVs (hUC-EVs) using electroporation and combining it with surface-modified collagen II-targeted peptides, which significantly enhanced its cartilage targeting ability and therapeutic efficacy. Recently, Wu et al. (64) constructed an engineered stem cell cluster to continuously deliver miRNA-874-3p using EVs secreted by bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells to achieve chondrocyte repair and regeneration while effectively mitigating the progression of OA.

Microfluidic technology has shown great potential in the field of drug delivery because of its ability to achieve precise control of droplet volume, morphology, and internal structure (65). Yang et al. (66) prepared degradable gelatin microspheres (CAP-EXOs/miR-148a@GAM) loaded with CAP-modified exosomes on the basis of microfluidic technology for the continuous delivery of miR-148a for the treatment of OA, significantly promoting the synthesis of ECM and delaying the progression of OA by inhibiting ROBO2 expression and the MAPK signaling pathway. Hydrogel microparticles (HMPs) based on hyaluronic acid prepared by microfluidic technology encapsulate extracellular vesicles derived from subcutaneous adipose stem cells loaded with miR-99b-3p to form the HMPs@ExosScAT-99b-3p system; research by Yin et al. (67) reported that this system not only addresses the issues of a short in vivo half-life and poor targeting of EVs but also promotes cartilage self-repair and homeostasis restoration by specifically inhibiting ADAMTS4, thereby demonstrating significant therapeutic potential for OA both in vivo and in vitro.

In the field of biological therapy research for OA, large animal studies based on secretome analysis are gradually emerging. Presently, multiple studies in dogs and horses have employed intra-articular administration of MSC secretome or blood cell secretome (BCS) to reduce inflammatory responses, alleviate joint swelling, and improve joint function (6870). Other studies have shown that injecting human MSC-derived exosomes into porcine knee weight-bearing osteochondral defect models can significantly improve the morphological and mechanical repair of cartilage and subchondral bone, indicating that they exert cross-species effects (71). As a key component of the secretome, EVs contain abundant endogenous miRNAs (72), which may constitute one mechanism underpinning their therapeutic effects. These studies provide robust translational evidence for future engineered EV delivery systems loaded with specific miRNAs.

4.2 Polymer-based nanoparticles

In comparison with EV delivery systems, polymeric nanoparticles (PNPs) demonstrate highly controllable physicochemical properties, along with higher production efficiency and enhanced drug loading capacity (73, 74). Polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers are extensively employed in drug delivery because of their highly branched architecture and internal cavities (75), and polyethylene glycol (PEG) modification can optimize their surface charge and stability (76). Chen et al. (77) delivered miR-224-5p using fifth-generation PAMAM (G5-PAMAM) functionalized with arginine, phenylalanine, and histidine, thereby alleviating cartilage degeneration and synovial inflammation by inhibiting pentraxin 3. Long et al. (78) utilized 50% PEG-modified G5-PAMAM dendrimer macromolecules loaded with miR-455-3p and combined with CAPs and minimal self-peptides (MSPs), which were then further complexed with a thermosensitive hydrogel. This composite not only achieved sustained release and precisely targeted delivery of miR-455-3p but also suppressed chondrocyte hypertrophy and apoptosis while promoting matrix synthesis by regulating key pathogenic pathways. Ji et al. (79) employed PEGylated PAMAM dendritic carriers modified with chondrocyte-specific nucleic acid aptamers (tgg2) to deliver miR-141/200c cluster inhibitors. This approach relieved the suppression of SIRT1, enabling SIRT1 to inhibit the IL-6/STAT3 pathway. Consequently, inflammation was suppressed, the ECM and cartilage were protected, and cartilage degeneration was even reversed, thereby effectively delaying the progression of OA.

Polyvinylamine (PVAm), as a hydrophilic cationic polymer, can effectively bind negatively charged RNA and exhibits good transfection efficiency, making it highly promising for use in the field of targeted therapy (80). Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) is a hydrophobic polymer that has been extensively studied because of its excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and good mechanical properties (81). Zhao et al. (82) achieved chondro-targeted delivery of miR-140 via CAP-PVAm-PLGA, a copolymer formed from CAP-modified PVAm and PLGA, thereby suppressing inflammation and matrix degradation. Another study employed triple polysaccharide nanoparticles composed of chondroitin sulfate, chitosan, and hyaluronic acid to deliver miR-149-5p. This approach not only effectively transfected cells and significantly reduced the expression of the target gene FUT-1, but also promoted cartilage differentiation through the components released upon degradation (83).

4.3 Lipid-based nanoparticles

Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) possess excellent biocompatibility and ability to improve drug stability and targeting efficiency (84), and they are widely used for delivering nucleic acids and small-molecule drugs (85). The presence of positively charged hydrophilic head groups in cationic lipids promotes electrostatic interactions with negatively charged nucleic acids, thereby enhancing the encapsulation of nucleic acids and promoting intracellular escape (86). Zheng et al. (87) encapsulated AgPEI nanoparticles loaded with miR-200c-3p within liposomes to form the Lipo-AgPEI-miR-200c-3p complex, which effectively blocked the inflammatory-apoptotic-matrix degradation malignant cycle of chondrocytes in vitro. However, its in vivo efficacy and safety require further verification. Additionally, He et al. (88) utilized lornoxicam cationic liposomes to load miR-140, obtaining cationic liposomes coloaded with lornoxicam and miR-140, which combine anti-inflammatory and gene therapy functions. This significantly improved the stability of miR-140 and its uptake efficiency by chondrocytes, effectively alleviating joint swelling, inhibiting inflammation, and promoting cartilage repair. This finding encourages the combination of other drugs with miRNA delivery for synergistic treatment of OA.

4.4 Inorganic-based nanoparticles

Compared to organic nanoparticles, inorganic nanocarriers exhibit superior structural stability and enhanced mechanical properties, thereby attracting significant attention from researchers (89). Yang et al. (90) utilized ZIF-8, a metal–organic framework material featuring noncytotoxic zinc(II) as its metal coordination center, as a miRNA delivery vehicle. Through a Y-shaped microfluidic chip, the researchers efficiently prepared miR-200c-3p@ZIF-8, significantly reducing the expression of inflammatory factors in OA. However, traditional spherical nanoparticles have limited loading capacity and insufficient transfection efficiency (91); thus, researchers have developed new inorganic nanocarriers. For example, Li et al. (92) delivered miR-17-5p using streamlined ZnO nanoparticles combined with methyl acrylate-modified gelatin (GelMA). In this way, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells are recruited via zinc ions, promoting matrix synthesis while inhibiting catabolic processes. Chen et al. (93) used urchin-like cerium dioxide nanoparticles to efficiently load miR-224-5p, and their surface area increased, which not only improved their miRNA loading capacity and antioxidant capacity but also enhanced their therapeutic efficacy. Taken together, these findings indicate that the novel nanoparticle-based miRNA carriers demonstrate superior loading capacity and can effectively enhance the therapeutic efficacy of OA treatment. However, the long-term biological safety of such materials requires further investigation.

4.5 Comparative analysis and limitations

EVs exhibit exceptional biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, and excellent tissue penetration. However, their large-scale production remains constrained by technical challenges, with complex purification processes that are difficult to standardize (60). Furthermore, EVs possess limited cargo capacity, and the potential risks associated with engineering modifications remain uncertain. EVs derived from different cell sources may carry bioactive molecules, potentially triggering uncontrollable biological effects (94). In comparison, PNPs are relatively simple to prepare, less costly, and exhibit higher loading efficiencies (73). However, many cationic polymers carry positive charges that may cause cell membrane damage and cytotoxicity, potentially triggering inflammatory responses (95). Additionally, degradation products from certain polymers may also induce cytotoxicity and immune reactions (96). LNPs represent one of the most mature nucleic acid delivery platforms currently available and have been extensively utilized in mRNA vaccines (85). LNPs offer advantages such as stable preparation processes, ease of large-scale production, and high delivery efficiency (84). However, they still carry potential toxicity risks. In addition, due to the susceptibility of lipid membranes to oxidation and hydrolysis, they typically require cryopreservation or cold storage to ensure stability (97). Inorganic nanoparticles possess unique physicochemical properties such as large surface area, excellent stability, and precise controllability of morphology. Their primary concern lies in insufficient long-term biosafety because some inorganic nanoparticles degrade slowly or not at all within the body, potentially accumulating in tissues and triggering toxicity or inflammation (98).

5 Challenges in clinical translation

Although miRNA delivery based on nanocarriers shows great promise in the treatment of OA, its clinical translation and application still face multiple challenges. First, OA is a chronic condition requiring long-term, repeated administration of medication. While most nanomaterials demonstrate relative safety in short-term animal studies, their prolonged use may exacerbate local inflammation or cause chronic synovial irritation. Degradation products from the carrier may also accumulate within the joint cavity, posing potential toxicity to chondrocytes (99). Second, the multi-target nature of miRNAs themselves, coupled with the barrier effect posed by the dense articular matrix, results in coexisting off-target risks and delivery efficiency challenges (19, 100). Although previous studies have employed targeted peptides or surface modifications to enhance tissue affinity, achieving sustained and specific delivery remains challenging in the dynamically updated joint microenvironment (101). Third, challenges in large-scale production and quality control. Issues such as batch-to-batch variability in vesicles and insufficient stability of polymers and liposomes severely limit the feasibility of clinical translation (61, 102). Finally, the limitations of drug efficacy evaluation systems also constrain translational prospects. Clinical approval requires substantial, reliable preclinical and clinical data. However, most existing studies rely on rodent models, which differ markedly from humans in joint size, biomechanical properties, and disease progression (103). Future efforts should strengthen large animal studies, particularly spontaneous large animal OA models, to more accurately assess long-term drug safety, pharmacokinetic characteristics, and functional improvements. Therefore, challenges ranging from safety and biological complexity to production processes and model evaluation collectively constitute critical hurdles that must be overcome before nanoparticle-based miRNA delivery therapies can advance to clinical application.

6 Future perspectives

Nanocarrier-based miRNA delivery strategies demonstrate significant potential in the treatment of OA, yet several critical research gaps remain to be addressed. Future studies should delve into material safety, disease heterogeneity, and clinical translational feasibility, striving to develop novel smart delivery systems. First, biosafety assessment remains one of the most significant research gaps. Future efforts should establish a long-term, comprehensive safety evaluation system and develop novel materials with enhanced biodegradability and biocompatibility to mitigate immunogenicity and tissue accumulation risks. Second, future studies should aim to develop various hybrid nanoparticles and enhance the fine-tuned design of their functions, integrating the advantages of different materials to ultimately achieve composite nanomaterials with high targeting capability, excellent manufacturability, and superior safety. Third, developing smart nanocarriers with active response capabilities will transcend traditional passive targeting mechanisms. By incorporating smart stimulus-responsive elements that dynamically respond to changes in the OA microenvironment, researchers can achieve controlled release of miRNAs based on the unique pathological cues of OA joints. Fourth, given the multifactorial nature of OA, the therapeutic potential of combination therapies should be explored. Co-delivery of multiple miRNAs or the combined delivery of miRNAs with small-molecule drugs can synergistically modulate gene networks while simultaneously addressing multiple pathological pathways. Finally, by integrating cutting-edge technologies such as multi-omics analysis and single-cell sequencing, researchers can precisely decipher the regulatory network of miRNAs in the pathological progression of OA. On the basis of the miRNA expression profile, future studies could further leverage advanced nanotechnology platforms to achieve true personalized precision treatment.

7 Conclusion

In conclusion, the targeted delivery of nanotechnology-based miRNAs opens new avenues for treating OA. Overcoming delivery barriers and an in-depth understanding of disease mechanisms hold promise for developing next-generation personalized precision treatment regimens for OA patients.

Author contributions

LL: Writing – original draft. ZX: Writing – review & editing. FG: Visualization, Writing – review & editing. JX: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was funded by the Scientific Research Project of Anhui Higher Education Institutions (2024AH050786).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank AJE (www.aje.cn, accessed on 6 October 2025) for English language editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Tang, S, Zhang, C, Oo, WM, Fu, K, Risberg, MA, Bierma-Zeinstra, SM, et al. Osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2025) 11:10. doi: 10.1038/s41572-025-00594-6,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Sanchez-Lopez, E, Coras, R, Torres, A, Lane, NE, and Guma, M. Synovial inflammation in osteoarthritis progression. Nat Rev Rheumatol. (2022) 18:258–75. doi: 10.1038/s41584-022-00749-9,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Yao, Q, Wu, X, Tao, C, Gong, W, Chen, M, Qu, M, et al. Osteoarthritis: pathogenic signaling pathways and therapeutic targets. Sig Transduct Target Ther. (2023) 8:56. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01330-w,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Belluzzi, E, Macchi, V, Fontanella, C, Carniel, E, Olivotto, E, Filardo, G, et al. Infrapatellar fat pad gene expression and protein production in patients with and without osteoarthritis. IJMS. (2020) 21:6016. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176016,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Liu, W, Guo, N, Wang, J, and Xu, B. Osteoarthritis: mechanisms and therapeutic advances. MedComm. (2025) 6:e70290. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70290,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Courties, A, Kouki, I, Soliman, N, Mathieu, S, and Sellam, J. Osteoarthritis year in review 2024: epidemiology and therapy. Osteoarthr Cartil. (2024) 32:1397–404. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2024.07.014,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Tong, L, Yu, H, Huang, X, Shen, J, Xiao, G, Chen, L, et al. Current understanding of osteoarthritis pathogenesis and relevant new approaches. Bone Res. (2022) 10:60. doi: 10.1038/s41413-022-00226-9,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Schäfer, N, and Grässel, S. Targeted therapy for osteoarthritis: progress and pitfalls. Nat Med. (2022) 28:2473–5. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02057-x,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Wilson, TG, Baghel, M, Kaur, N, Datta, I, Loveless, I, Potla, P, et al. Circulating miR-126-3p is a mechanistic biomarker for knee osteoarthritis. Nat Commun. (2025) 16:2021. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57308-5,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Kim, H, Lee, Y-Y, and Kim, VN. The biogenesis and regulation of animal microRNAs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2025) 26:276–96. doi: 10.1038/s41580-024-00805-0,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Shang, X. Mechanosensitive miRNAs in cartilage and subchondral bone remodeling: emerging targets for osteoarthritis therapy. JIR. (2025) 18:9609–25. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S529149,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kara, G, Arun, B, Calin, GA, and Ozpolat, B. miRacle of microRNA-driven cancer nanotherapeutics. Cancer. (2022) 14:3818. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153818,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Deka Dey, A, Yousefiasl, S, Kumar, A, Dabbagh Moghaddam, F, Rahimmanesh, I, Samandari, M, et al. miRNA -encapsulated abiotic materials and biovectors for cutaneous and oral wound healing: biogenesis, mechanisms, and delivery nanocarriers. Bioeng Transl Med. (2023) 8:e10343. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10343,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Su, X, Wang, H, Li, Q, and Chen, Z. Extracellular vesicles: a review of their therapeutic potentials, sources, biodistribution, and administration routes. IJN. (2025) 20:3175–99. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S502591,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Yan, Y, Liu, X-Y, Lu, A, Wang, X-Y, Jiang, L-X, and Wang, J-C. Non-viral vectors for RNA delivery. J Control Release. (2022) 342:241–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.01.008,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Lou, Z, and Bu, F. Recent advances in osteoarthritis research: a review of treatment strategies, mechanistic insights, and acupuncture. Medicine. (2025) 104:e41335. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041335,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Drohat, P, Baron, M, Kaplan, LD, Best, TM, and Kouroupis, D. Long-acting extracellular vesicle-based biologics in osteoarthritis immunotherapy. Bioengineering. (2025) 12:525. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050525,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Sargazi, S, Siddiqui, B, Qindeel, M, Rahdar, A, Bilal, M, Behzadmehr, R, et al. Chitosan nanocarriers for microRNA delivery and detection: a preliminary review with emphasis on cancer. Carbohydr Polym. (2022) 290:119489. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119489,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Wu, M, Chen, Z, Song, B, Wang, X, and Liang, W. Current status and future perspectives of research on intra-articular drug delivery systems for osteoarthritis therapy. Acta Biomater. (2025) 203:59–77. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2025.07.057,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Alahverdi, M, Dadmehr, M, and Sahebkar, A. Nanocarriers for microRNA delivery: a review of applied platforms and perspectives. Int J Biol Macromol. (2025) 319:145463. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.145463,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Guo, D, Yan, J, Yang, Z, Chen, M, Zhong, W, Yuan, X, et al. The immune regulatory role of exosomal miRNAs and their clinical application potential in heart failure. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1476865. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1476865,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Komatsu, S, Kitai, H, and Suzuki, HI. Network regulation of microRNA biogenesis and target interaction. Cells. (2023) 12:306. doi: 10.3390/cells12020306,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Nakanishi, K. Anatomy of four human Argonaute proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. (2022) 50:6618–38. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac519,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Iwakawa, H, and Tomari, Y. Life of RISC: formation, action, and degradation of RNA-induced silencing complex. Mol Cell. (2022) 82:30–43. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.11.026,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Salim, U, Kumar, A, Kulshreshtha, R, and Vivekanandan, P. Biogenesis, characterization, and functions of mirtrons. WIREs RNA. (2022) 13:e1680. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1680,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Herrera-Carrillo, E, and Berkhout, B. Dicer-independent processing of small RNA duplexes: mechanistic insights and applications. Nucleic Acids Res. (2017) 45:10369–79. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx779,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Liu, S, Deng, Z, Chen, K, Jian, S, Zhou, F, Yang, Y, et al. Cartilage tissue engineering: from proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines to osteoarthritis treatments (review). Mol Med Rep. (2022) 25:99. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2022.12615,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Zhang, X-A, and Kong, H. Mechanism of HIFs in osteoarthritis. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1168799. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1168799,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Ouyang, Z, Dong, L, Yao, F, Wang, K, Chen, Y, Li, S, et al. Cartilage-related collagens in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: from pathogenesis to therapeutics. IJMS. (2023) 24:9841. doi: 10.3390/ijms24129841,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Fujii, Y, Liu, L, Yagasaki, L, Inotsume, M, Chiba, T, and Asahara, H. Cartilage homeostasis and osteoarthritis. IJMS. (2022) 23:6316. doi: 10.3390/ijms23116316,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Szala, D, Kopańska, M, Trojniak, J, Jabłoński, J, Hanf-Osetek, D, Snela, S, et al. The role of MicroRNAs in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. IJMS. (2024) 25:6352. doi: 10.3390/ijms25126352,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Pekáčová, A, Baloun, J, Švec, X, and Šenolt, L. Non-coding RNAs in diseases with a focus on osteoarthritis. WIREs RNA. (2023) 14:e1756. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1756,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Lin, Y, Zhang, L, Ji, M, Shen, S, Chen, Y, Wu, S, et al. MiR-653-5p drives osteoarthritis pathogenesis by modulating chondrocyte senescence. Arthritis Res Ther. (2024) 26:111. doi: 10.1186/s13075-024-03334-5,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Jiang, Y, Zhang, L, and Tian, H. MicroRNA-149 improves osteoarthritis via repression of VCAM-1 and inactivation of PI3K/AKT pathway. Exp Gerontol. (2023) 174:112103. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2023.112103,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Lu, B, Ling Xia, W, Qing Bo, L, Ling, Z, and Zhi Fen, F. miR-22-3p relieves the osteoarthritis by targeting to inflammasome in vivo and in vitro. Turkish J Biochem. (2022) 47:309–16. doi: 10.1515/tjb-2021-0223

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Zhang, H, Chen, C, and Song, J. microRNA-4701-5p protects against interleukin-1β induced human chondrocyte CHON-001 cells injury via modulating HMGA1. J Orthop Surg Res. (2022) 17:246. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03083-8,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Cao, Y, Tang, S, Nie, X, Zhou, Z, Ruan, G, Han, W, et al. Decreased miR-214–3p activates NF-κB pathway and aggravates osteoarthritis progression. EBioMedicine. (2021) 65:103283. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103283,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Li, Y, Xie, W, Zheng, Y, Li, H, Wen, Z, Wang, C, et al. The miR-548d-5p/SP1 signaling axis regulates chondrocyte proliferation and inflammatory responses in osteoarthritis. Int Immunopharmacol. (2022) 110:109029. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109029,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Zhou, Y, Zhao, Z, Yan, L, and Yang, J. MiR-485-3p promotes proliferation of osteoarthritis chondrocytes and inhibits apoptosis via Notch2 and the NF-κB pathway. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. (2021) 43:370–9. doi: 10.1080/08923973.2021.1918150,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Wang, Y, Shen, S, Li, Z, Li, W, and Weng, X. MIR-140-5p affects chondrocyte proliferation, apoptosis, and inflammation by targeting HMGB1 in osteoarthritis. Inflamm Res. (2020) 69:63–73. doi: 10.1007/s00011-019-01294-0,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Chen, Y, Huang, H, Zhong, W, Li, L, Lu, Y, and Si, H. miR-140-5p protects cartilage progenitor/stem cells from fate changes in knee osteoarthritis. Int Immunopharmacol. (2023) 114:109576. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109576,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Liu, Y, Zhang, Z, Lu, X, Liu, C, and Zhang, H. Senescence-responsive miR-33-5p promotes chondrocyte senescence and osteoarthritis progression by targeting SIRT6. Int Immunopharmacol. (2023) 121:110506. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110506,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Cheng, C, Tian, Y, Yang, R, Guo, W, Xiao, K, Zhang, F, et al. miR-5581 contributes to osteoarthritis by targeting NRF1 to disturb the proliferation and functions of chondrocytes. Am J Pathol. (2023) 193:1234–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2023.05.019,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Tavallaee, G, Lively, S, Rockel, JS, Ali, SA, Im, M, Sarda, C, et al. Contribution of MICRORNA -27b-3p to synovial fibrotic responses in knee osteoarthritis. Arthrit Rheumatol. (2022) 74:1928–42. doi: 10.1002/art.42285,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Ko, J-Y, Wang, F-S, Lian, W-S, Fang, H-C, and Kuo, S-J. Cartilage-specific knockout of miRNA-128a expression normalizes the expression of circadian clock genes (CCGs) and mitigates the severity of osteoarthritis. Biom J. (2024) 47:100629. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2023.100629,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Feng, X, Lu, J, Wu, Y, and Xu, H. MiR-18a-3p improves cartilage matrix remodeling and inhibits inflammation in osteoarthritis by suppressing PDP1. J Physiol Sci. (2022) 72:3. doi: 10.1186/s12576-022-00827-3,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Ding, B, Xu, S, Sun, X, Gao, J, Nie, W, and Xu, H. miR-18a-3p encourages apoptosis of chondrocyte in osteoarthritis via HOXA1 pathway. Curr Math Publ. (2020) 13:328–41. doi: 10.2174/1874467213666200204143740,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Yang, T, Li, C, Li, Y, Cai, G, Wang, G, He, L, et al. MicroRNA-146a-5p alleviates the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis by inhibiting SDF-1/CXCR4-induced chondrocyte autophagy. Int Immunopharmacol. (2023) 117:109938. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.109938,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Zhang, H, Zheng, W, Li, D, and Zheng, J. miR-146a-5p promotes chondrocyte apoptosis and inhibits autophagy of osteoarthritis by targeting NUMB. CARTILAGE. (2021) 13:1467S–77S. doi: 10.1177/19476035211023550,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Campbell, TM, and Trudel, G. Protecting the regenerative environment: selecting the optimal delivery vehicle for cartilage repair—a narrative review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. (2024) 12:1283752. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1283752,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Castanheira, C, Balaskas, P, Falls, C, Ashraf-Kharaz, Y, Clegg, P, Burke, K, et al. Equine synovial fluid small non-coding RNA signatures in early osteoarthritis. BMC Vet Res. (2021) 17:26. doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02707-7,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Connard, SS, Gaesser, AM, Clarke, EJ, Linardi, RL, Even, KM, Engiles, JB, et al. Plasma and synovial fluid extracellular vesicles display altered microRNA profiles in horses with naturally occurring post-traumatic osteoarthritis: an exploratory study. javma. (2024) 262:S83–96. doi: 10.2460/javma.24.02.0102,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Castanheira, CIGD, Taylor, S, Skiöldebrand, E, Rubio-Martinez, LM, Hackl, M, Clegg, PD, et al. Synovial fluid and serum MicroRNA signatures in equine osteoarthritis. IJMS. (2025) 26:11190. doi: 10.3390/ijms262211190,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Zhou, X, Zhang, Y, Hou, M, Liu, H, Yang, H, Chen, X, et al. Melatonin prevents cartilage degradation in early-stage osteoarthritis through activation of miR-146a/NRF2/HO-1 Axis. J Bone Miner Res. (2020) 37:1056–72. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4527,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Yamazaki, A, Tomo, Y, Eto, H, Tanegashima, K, and Edamura, K. A pilot study of microRNA assessment as a means to identify novel biomarkers of spontaneous osteoarthritis in dogs. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:18152. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22362-2,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Antunes, J, Salcedo-Jiménez, R, Lively, S, Potla, P, Coté, N, Dubois, M-S, et al. microRNAs are differentially expressed in equine plasma of horses with osteoarthritis and osteochondritis dissecans versus control horses. PLoS One. (2024) 19:e0297303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297303,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Komuro, H, Aminova, S, Lauro, K, and Harada, M. Advances of engineered extracellular vesicles-based therapeutics strategy. Sci Technol Adv Mater. (2022) 23:655–81. doi: 10.1080/14686996.2022.2133342

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Wang, Y, Wang, H, Tan, J, Cao, Z, Wang, Q, Wang, H, et al. Therapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cells and their derived exosomes in diseases. Mol Biomed. (2025) 6:34. doi: 10.1186/s43556-025-00277-4,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Esmaeili, A, Yazdanpanah, N, and Rezaei, N. LncRNAs orchestrating Neuroinflammation: a comprehensive review. Cell Mol Neurobiol. (2025) 45:21. doi: 10.1007/s10571-025-01538-0,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Tang, J, Wang, X, Lin, X, and Wu, C. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: a regulator and carrier for targeting bone-related diseases. Cell Death Discov. (2024) 10:212. doi: 10.1038/s41420-024-01973-w,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Liang, Y, Xu, X, Li, X, Xiong, J, Li, B, Duan, L, et al. Chondrocyte-targeted MicroRNA delivery by engineered exosomes toward a cell-free osteoarthritis therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. (2020) 12:36938–47. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c10458,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Zhao, S, Xiu, G, Wang, J, Wen, Y, Lu, J, Wu, B, et al. Engineering exosomes derived from subcutaneous fat MSCs specially promote cartilage repair as miR-199a-3p delivery vehicles in osteoarthritis. J Nanobiotechnol. (2023) 21:341. doi: 10.1186/s12951-023-02086-9,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Liu, W, Liu, A, Li, X, Sun, Z, Sun, Z, Liu, Y, et al. Dual-engineered cartilage-targeting extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stem cells enhance osteoarthritis treatment via miR-223/NLRP3/pyroptosis axis: toward a precision therapy. Bioactive Mater. (2023) 30:169–83. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.06.012,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Wu, Y, Feng, Y, Hu, F, Zheng, X, Ding, Y, Liu, X, et al. Engineered stem cell clusters for extracellular vesicles-mediated gene delivery to rejuvenate chondrocytes and facilitate Chondrogenesis in osteoarthritis therapy. Adv Sci. (2025) 12:e2500964. doi: 10.1002/advs.202500964,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Zhang, D, Liu, W, Feng, L, Feng, Y, Yu, Y, Cheng, T, et al. Innovative advances in droplet microfluidics. Research. (2025) 8:0856. doi: 10.34133/research.0856,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Yang, T, Ma, H, Li, K, Xiang, J, Qiu, J, Ding, Y, et al. A microsphere loaded with chondrocyte-targeting exosomes continuously deliver miR-148a for osteoarthritis therapy. Mater Today Bio. (2025) 33:101944. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101944,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Yin, Z, Qin, C, Pan, S, Shi, C, Wu, G, Feng, Y, et al. Injectable hyperbranched PEG crosslinked hyaluronan hydrogel microparticles containing mir-99a-3p modified subcutaneous ADSCs-derived exosomes was beneficial for long-term treatment of osteoarthritis. Mater Today Bio. (2023) 23:100813. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100813,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Berni, P, Del Bue, M, Conti, V, Andreoli, V, Ramoni, R, Angelone, M, et al. Clinical evaluation of freeze-dried secretome (lyosecretome) for osteoarthritis: a controlled trial in dogs and preliminary safety assessment in horses. Int J Pharm. (2025) 681:125864. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125864,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Alves, JC, Santos, A, Jorge, P, and Carreira, LM. A comparison of intra-articular blood cell Secretome and blood cell Secretome with triamcinolone Acetonide in dogs with osteoarthritis: a crossover study. Animals. (2022) 12:3358. doi: 10.3390/ani12233358,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Kearney, CM, Khatab, S, Van Buul, GM, Plomp, SGM, Korthagen, NM, Labberté, MC, et al. Treatment effects of intra-articular allogenic mesenchymal stem cell secretome in an equine model of joint inflammation. Front Vet Sci. (2022) 9:907616. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.907616,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Zhang, S, Wong, KL, Ren, X, Teo, KYW, Afizah, H, Choo, ABH, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell exosomes promote functional osteochondral repair in a clinically relevant porcine model. Am J Sports Med. (2022) 50:788–800. doi: 10.1177/03635465211068129,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Grieco, G, Piccolo, S, Ragni, E, and De Girolamo, L. Secretome and extracellular vesicle signatures in bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells after expansion in standard and next-generation media. Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucleic Acids. (2025) 6:195–215. doi: 10.20517/evcna.2024.99,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Soltanmohammadi, F, Gharehbaba, AM, Zangi, AR, Adibkia, K, and Javadzadeh, Y. Current knowledge of hybrid nanoplatforms composed of exosomes and organic/inorganic nanoparticles for disease treatment and cell/tissue imaging. Biomed Pharmacother. (2024) 178:117248. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117248,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Peng, C, Luan, H, Shang, Q, Xiang, W, Yasin, P, and Song, X. Mannosamine-modified poly(lactic- co -glycolic acid)-polyethylene glycol nanoparticles for the targeted delivery of Rifapentine and isoniazid in tuberculosis therapy. Bioconjug Chem. (2025) 36:1021–33. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5c00062,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Surekha, B, Kommana, NS, Dubey, SK, Kumar, AVP, Shukla, R, and Kesharwani, P. PAMAM dendrimer as a talented multifunctional biomimetic nanocarrier for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. (2021) 204:111837. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111837,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Johnston, BM, Grodzinsky, AJ, and Hammond, PT. Charge shielding effects of PEG bound to NH2 -terminated PAMAM dendrimers – an experimental approach. Soft Matter. (2023) 19:3033–46. doi: 10.1039/D2SM01698B,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Chen, H, Chen, F, Hu, F, Li, Y, Zhang, M, Zhou, Q, et al. MicroRNA-224-5p nanoparticles balance homeostasis via inhibiting cartilage degeneration and synovial inflammation for synergistic alleviation of osteoarthritis. Acta Biomater. (2023) 167:401–15. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.06.010,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Long, D, Mao, G, Li, H, Chen, H, Huang, R, Zhao, T, et al. Injectable nanocomposite hydrogel system for miRNA-based cartilage repair in knee osteoarthritis. Adv Funct Mater. (2025) 35:2423227. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202423227

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Ji, M-L, Jiang, H, Wu, F, Geng, R, Ya, LK, Lin, YC, et al. Precise targeting of miR-141/200c cluster in chondrocytes attenuates osteoarthritis development. Ann Rheum Dis. (2021) 80:356–66. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218469,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Tian, Y, Zhao, Y, Yin, C, Tan, S, Wang, X, Yang, C, et al. Polyvinylamine with moderate binding affinity as a highly effective vehicle for RNA delivery. J Control Release. (2022) 345:20–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.03.003,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Lu, Y, Cheng, D, Niu, B, Wang, X, Wu, X, and Wang, A. Properties of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) and Progress of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based biodegradable materials in biomedical research. Pharmaceuticals. (2023) 16:454. doi: 10.3390/ph16030454,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Zhao, Y, Deng, X, Tan, S, Zhang, J, Han, J, Wang, X, et al. Co-polymer carrier with dual advantages of cartilage-penetrating and targeting improves delivery and efficacy of MicroRNA treatment of osteoarthritis. Adv Healthcare Mater. (2023) 12:e2202143. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202202143,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Çelik, E, Bayram, C, and Denkbaş, EB. Chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells by microRNA loaded triple polysaccharide nanoparticle system. Mater Sci Eng C. (2019) 102:756–63. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.05.006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Gao, Y, Liu, X, Chen, N, Yang, X, and Tang, F. Recent advance of liposome nanoparticles for nucleic acid therapy. Pharmaceutics. (2023) 15:178. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010178,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Eygeris, Y, Gupta, M, Kim, J, and Sahay, G. Chemistry of lipid nanoparticles for RNA delivery. Acc Chem Res. (2022) 55:2–12. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00544,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Zhang, T, Yin, H, Li, Y, Yang, H, Ge, K, Zhang, J, et al. Optimized lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) for organ-selective nucleic acids delivery in vivo. iScience. (2024) 27:109804. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109804,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Zheng, D, Chen, T, Yang, K, Yin, G, Chen, Y, Gui, J, et al. Microfluidic synthesis of miR-200c-3p lipid nanoparticles: targeting ZEB2 to alleviate chondrocyte damage in osteoarthritis. IJN. (2025) 20:505–21. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S491711,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

88. He, K, Huang, X, Shan, R, Yang, X, Song, R, Xie, F, et al. Intra-articular injection of Lornoxicam and MicroRNA-140 co-loaded cationic liposomes enhanced the therapeutic treatment of experimental osteoarthritis. AAPS PharmSciTech. (2021) 23:9. doi: 10.1208/s12249-021-02149-w,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Narayana, S, Gowda, BHJ, Hani, U, Shimu, SS, Paul, K, Das, A, et al. Inorganic nanoparticle-based treatment approaches for colorectal cancer: recent advancements and challenges. J Nanobiotechnol. (2024) 22:427. doi: 10.1186/s12951-024-02701-3,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Yang, K, Ni, M, Xu, C, Wang, L, Han, L, Lv, S, et al. Microfluidic one-step synthesis of a metal−organic framework for osteoarthritis therapeutic microRNAs delivery. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. (2023) 11:1239364. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1239364,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Lagarrigue, P, Moncalvo, F, and Cellesi, F. Non-spherical polymeric nanocarriers for therapeutics: the effect of shape on biological systems and drug delivery properties. Pharmaceutics. (2022) 15:32. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010032,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Li, W, Shi, Z, Jing, H, Dou, Y, Liu, X, Zhang, M, et al. Streamlined metal-based hydrogel facilitates stem cell differentiation, extracellular matrix homeostasis and cartilage repair in male rats. Nat Commun. (2025) 16:4344. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59725-y,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Chen, H, Ye, T, Hu, F, Chen, K, Li, B, Qiu, M, et al. Urchin-like ceria nanoparticles for enhanced gene therapy of osteoarthritis. Sci Adv. (2023) 9:eadf0988. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf0988,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Wang, C, Zhang, Y, Kong, W, Rong, X, Zhong, Z, Jiang, L, et al. Delivery of miRNAs using nanoparticles for the treatment of osteosarcoma. IJN. (2024) 19:8641–60. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S471900

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Li, S, Li, F, Wang, Y, Li, W, Wu, J, Hu, X, et al. Multiple delivery strategies of nanocarriers for myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: current strategies and future prospective. Drug Deliv. (2024) 31:2298514. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2023.2298514,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Matveeva, VG, Senokosova, EA, Sevostianova, VV, Khanova, MY, Glushkova, TV, Akentieva, TN, et al. Advantages of fibrin polymerization method without the use of exogenous thrombin for vascular tissue engineering applications. Biomedicine. (2022) 10:789. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10040789,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Meulewaeter, S, Nuytten, G, Cheng, MHY, De Smedt, SC, Cullis, PR, De Beer, T, et al. Continuous freeze-drying of messenger RNA lipid nanoparticles enables storage at higher temperatures. J Control Release. (2023) 357:149–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.03.039,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Zhang, C, Yin, Y, Zhao, J, Li, Y, Wang, Y, Zhang, Z, et al. An update on novel ocular nanosystems with possible benefits in the treatment of corneal neovascularization. IJN. (2022) 17:4911–31. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S375570,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Li, X, Dai, B, Guo, J, Zheng, L, Guo, Q, Peng, J, et al. Nanoparticle–cartilage interaction: pathology-based intra-articular drug delivery for osteoarthritis therapy. Nano-Micro Lett. (2021) 13:149. doi: 10.1007/s40820-021-00670-y,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Zhang, T, Hu, Y, Yang, N, Yu, S, and Pu, X. The microRNA-34 family and its functional role in lung Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. (2024) 47:448–57. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000001106,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Li, J, Zhang, H, Han, Y, Hu, Y, Geng, Z, and Su, J. Targeted and responsive biomaterials in osteoarthritis. Theranostics. (2023) 13:931–54. doi: 10.7150/thno.78639,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Liu, H, Su, Y-Y, Jiang, X-C, and Gao, J-Q. Cell membrane-coated nanoparticles: a novel multifunctional biomimetic drug delivery system. Drug Deliv Transl Res. (2023) 13:716–37. doi: 10.1007/s13346-022-01252-0,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Alves-Simões, M. Rodent models of knee osteoarthritis for pain research. Osteoarthr Cartil. (2022) 30:802–14. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.01.010,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: gene therapy, microRNAs, nanoparticles, osteoarthritis, targeted delivery

Citation: Li L, Xu Z, Gao F and Xu J (2026) Current status and future prospects of nanocarrier-mediated miRNA delivery for osteoarthritis therapy. Front. Med. 12:1728944. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1728944

Received: 20 October 2025; Revised: 10 December 2025; Accepted: 10 December 2025;
Published: 15 January 2026.

Edited by:

Elisa Belluzzi, University of Padua, Italy

Reviewed by:

João Pedro Hübbe Pfeifer, 3D Biotechnology Solutions, Brazil
Bahareh Salmanian Hajiagha, Islamic Azad University System, Iran
Xiaoguang Zhang, Southern Medical University, China

Copyright © 2026 Li, Xu, Gao and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Junjie Xu, NTY1MjQ0N0AxNjMuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.