Francesco Murgolo
Michele Bertoni
Savino Spadaro
Salvatore Grasso- 1Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Precision-Regenerative Medicine and Jonic Area (DiMePRe-J), University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
- 2Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- 3Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- 4Department of Emergency, ASST Spedali Civili University Hospital, Piazzale Ospedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
- 5Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
Editorial on the Research Topic
Advanced monitoring in ARDS: enhancing mechanical ventilation through innovative techniques
Optimizing mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a cornerstone of critical care. While the principles of lung-protective ventilation such as low tidal volume, limited plateau pressure, and adequate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) are well established, lung injury is highly heterogeneous. Regions of collapse and overdistension often coexist, making global parameters insufficient; therefore, the development of advanced monitoring techniques has become essential to facilitate disease phenotyping and support tailored ventilatory management. In this Research Topic, we collect studies focused on bedside monitoring approaches that may help refine ventilatory strategies and potentially mitigate the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI).
Pettenuzzo et al. provide a comprehensive overview of current and emerging bedside tools for guiding lung-protective ventilation. Among these, electrical impedance tomography (EIT) stands out as a non-invasive, radiation-free technique capable of generating real-time regional images of lung aeration. Briefly, by tracking changes in thoracic electrical impedance throughout the respiratory cycle, EIT offers continuous insight into the distribution of ventilation, enabling clinicians to detect patterns of overdistension and collapse and, more broadly, the heterogeneous morphology that characterizes ARDS. This ability to capture regional dynamics at the bedside makes EIT particularly valuable for assessing the mechanical impact of ventilatory settings on the injured lung. The case report by Musaj et al., published in this series, represents a clear example of this potential: in a patient with severe unilateral lung injury, the authors performed near-daily EIT-guided PEEP titrations combined with esophageal pressure monitoring. This strategy allowed clinicians to adapt ventilation to evolving lung mechanics, progressively reducing PEEP from 18 to 8 cmH2O as recovery advanced, while minimizing both alveolar collapse and overdistension. This example clearly demonstrates how EIT can complement traditional imaging and support precision ventilation at the bedside. Yet, translating this potential into routine practice remains challenging, as device availability, the need for specialized expertise, and the absence of standardized protocols continue to limit its widespread adoption. Overcoming these barriers through training, protocol harmonization, and further clinical validation will be essential to fully realize the promise of EIT in guiding protective ventilation (1, 2).
In contrast, lung ultrasound (LUS) has already demonstrated its clinical utility as a simple, low-cost bedside tool (3, 4). Its portability and ease of use make it particularly attractive in resource-limited settings, where advanced technologies such as EIT may not be available. Beyond its established role in detecting pleural effusion and consolidations, recent studies have explored applications such as pleural strain assessment, which may provide additional insights into regional mechanics and open new perspectives for individualized ventilatory management. While LUS cannot provide the same continuous regional monitoring as EIT, its accessibility and growing evidence base position it as a practical and widely applicable complement to more sophisticated techniques.
The horizon of precision ventilation extends beyond imaging. As highlighted in their review, Pettenuzzo et al. explore research areas that are even more specialized and distant from routine clinical practice, such as the use of molecular markers and genetic signatures related to cellular stretch. Molecules like Clara Cell Secretory Protein-16 (CC-16) and specific microRNAs have been proposed as potential early indicators of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), paving the way for biologically guided ventilation. However, these approaches remain experimental and require robust validation before they can be integrated into clinical workflows.
Meanwhile, the enduring value of respiratory mechanics should not be underestimated. Simple bedside maneuvers, such as an end-inspiratory occlusion, allow measurement of plateau pressure and calculation of respiratory system compliance, parameters that are far from “mere numbers.” Indeed, respiratory system compliance reflects the amount of aerated lung available for ventilation, and driving pressure (tidal volume divided by compliance) serves as a practical tool to tailor tidal volume to the functional lung, reducing overdistension and cyclic strain (5–7). Moreover, combined with respiratory rate, these measurements enable estimation of mechanical power (the energy delivered to the lung parenchyma) helping clinicians strike the most efficient balance between tidal volume and frequency to minimize ventilatory energy load (8).
The integration of advanced monitoring tools and respiratory mechanics represents a significant step toward individualized ventilatory strategies in ARDS. While technological and logistical barriers persist, the trajectory is clear: precision medicine at the bedside is no longer a distant goal but an emerging reality. Bridging innovation with accessibility will be key to ensuring that these advances translate into improved outcomes for critically ill patients (9, 10).
Author contributions
FM: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MB: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SS: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SG: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author SS declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Frerichs I, Zhao Z, Becher T. Setting positive end-expiratory pressure by using electrical impedance tomography. Curr Opin Crit Care. (2024) 30:43–52. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001117
2. Songsangvorn N, Xu Y, Lu C, Li T, Sun J, Feng Z, et al. Electrical impedance tomography-guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration in ARDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. (2024) 50:617–31. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07362-2
3. Pierrakos C, Lieveld A, Pisani L, Giammario R, Grasso S, Ranzani OT, et al. A lower global lung ultrasound score is associated with higher likelihood of successful extubation in invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (2021) 105:1490–7. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0545
4. Mongodi S, Cortegiani A, Alonso-Ojembarrena A, Calza S, Vargiu S, Binda F, et al. ESICM-ESPNIC international expert consensus on quantitative lung ultrasound in intensive care. Intensive Care Med. (2025) 51:1022–49. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07932-y
5. Murgolo F, Greco DL, Spadaro S, Stram M, Marini JJ, Grasso S. Recruitment-to-inflation ratio reflects the impact of PEEP on dynamic lung strain in a highly recruitable model of ARDS. Ann Intensive Care. (2024) 14:106. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01343-w
6. Tonelli R, Grasso S, Cortegiani A, Fantini R, Marchioni A, Tabbì L, et al. Physiological effects of lung-protective ventilation in patients with lung fibrosis and usual interstitial pneumonia pattern versus primary ARDS: a matched-control study. Crit Care. (2023) 27:398. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04682-5
7. Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, Brochard L, Costa EL, Shoemaker DA, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. (2015) 372:747–55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639
8. Gattinoni L, Marini JJ, Pesenti A, Quintel M, Masesa K. The “baby lung” became an adult. Intensive Care Med. (2016) 42:663–73. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4200-8
9. Scaramuzzo G, Gamberini L, Tonetti T, Tappatà S, Forcellini S, Baroncini A, et al. Sustained oxygenation improvement after first prone positioning is associated with liberation from mechanical ventilation and mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. (2021) 11:63. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00853-1
Keywords: acute respiratory failure, ARDS, EIT, lung ultrasonography (LUS), mechanical ventilation
Citation: Murgolo F, Bertoni M, Spadaro S and Grasso S (2026) Editorial: Advanced monitoring in ARDS: enhancing mechanical ventilation through innovative techniques. Front. Med. 12:1756943. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1756943
Received: 29 November 2025; Accepted: 09 December 2025;
Published: 09 January 2026.
Edited and reviewed by: Michel Goldman, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
Copyright © 2026 Murgolo, Bertoni, Spadaro and Grasso. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Francesco Murgolo, ZnJhbmNlc2NvLm11cmdvbG9AdW5pYmEuaXQ=