Lin Zhao
Peiting Lin1
Peilin Xie- 1Department of Plastic Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
- 2The First Clinical Medical College, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
Vibrio vulnificus infection is characterized by rapid progression and poor prognosis, which can lead to disability or death without timely intervention. In some cities or countries where the incidence of V. vulnificus infection is not high, it is easy to cause misdiagnosis and delay the treatment of the disease. This case showed a 42-year-old man from a non-coastal area in China who accidentally stabbed his right hand while handling seafood 1 day earlier. He developed significant local redness, swelling, pain, and systemic symptoms. When the patient visits the doctor, the doctor makes an accurate initial diagnosis based on the patient’s medical history and clinical manifestations. Effective antibiotic combination treatment is given before the feedback of bacterial culture results. Fasciotomy is immediately performed when there are signs of progression of osteofascial compartment syndrome. Finally, the patient’s right hand and right forearm were preserved.
Introduction
Vibrio vulnificus is a bacterium naturally found in warm seawater, commonly present in coastal areas. V. vulnificus infection was first reported in 1979 (1). Since then, documented cases have confirmed its severity (2–4). Although infections are rare, they progress rapidly with high mortality rates, requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment to save lives (5). Here, we present a case of necrotizing fasciitis of the hand and cellulitis of the right forearm caused by V. vulnificus infection following a puncture wound from seafood. Through early administration of sensitive antibiotics and timely surgical intervention, we successfully cured the patient, providing crucial clinical reference for diagnosis and treatment.
Case report
A 42-year-old male was admitted to our department with a 1-day history of a lacerated wound and infection in his right hand. The patient reported sustaining a puncture injury to the hypothenar region of his right hand while handling seafood one day prior. The injury was initially associated with pain and bleeding, for which he received wound care at a local clinic. Subsequently, the wound developed progressive redness, swelling, and severe pain, rapidly spreading to the right forearm. Systemic symptoms, including chills, high fever, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue, and mild drowsiness. The patient presented emergently to our unit. On admission, the patient exhibited marked redness, swelling, and elevated skin temperature in the right hand and forearm, accompanied by severe pain. A full-thickness necrotic wound measuring approximately 3 cm × 2 cm was observed in the hypothenar region of the right hand (Figure 1). Based on the patient’s medical history and clinical presentation, a preliminary diagnosis of V. vulnificus-induced wound infection was made. Given the exceptionally high mortality rate associated with this condition, empirical antimicrobial therapy targeting Vibrio species (levofloxacin 500 mg IV qd, ceftriaxone 2 g IV q12h, and doxycycline 100 mg po q12h) was initiated immediately while awaiting the results of wound culture and sensitivity testing.
Figure 1. Clinical appearance of a full-thickness necrotic skin lesion in the hypothenar area of the right hand on admission.
Admission laboratory results revealed:
• Interleukin-6 (IL-6): > 1,525.00 pg/mL (reference range < 7 pg/mL)
• Procalcitonin (PCT): 54.055 ng/mL (reference range < 0.065 ng/mL)
• White blood cell (WBC) count: 13.6 × 109/L (reference range 3.5–9.5 × 109/L)
• Neutrophil percentage: 93.20% (reference range 50.0%–75.0%)
• Neutrophil count: 12.67 × 109/L (reference range 1.20–7.00 × 109/L)
• Platelet count: 89 × 109/L (reference range 100–300 × 109/L)
• Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c): 9.6% (reference range 4%–6%)
• Mean blood glucose: 12.8 mmol/L (reference range 3.6–7 mmol/L)
• Serum albumin: 28.30 g/L (reference range 40–55 g/L)
• Blood culture Gram stain: Gram-negative bacilli (positive)
By hospital day 2, the patient manifested a fulminant necrotizing soft tissue infection characterized by hemorrhagic bullae (Figure 2), ischemic mottling (Figure 3), and neurological deficits. When the patient exhibited worsening swelling in the right wrist and forearm, accompanied by numbness and a weak radial pulse, we informed the patient and his family about the severity of the condition. At this time, the patient had presented clinical manifestations of osteofascial compartment syndrome (pain, numbness, and weak radial pulse). In order to avoid serious consequences of disability caused by osteofascial compartment syndrome, the only effective treatment was emergency fasciotomy and decompression to release the high pressure and restore the blood supply to the limb. Emergency fasciotomy was performed with the following incisions (Figures 4, 5). During the dissection, strict attention was paid to preserving the integrity of blood vessels, nerves, and tendons. After achieving full decompression and thorough debridement, a negative pressure wound therapy system was applied. Postoperative Day 1 (Hospital Day 3): The patient remained in stable condition. And wound culture results confirmed V. vulnificus infection (Table 1). The current antibiotic regimen should be maintained, supplemented with targeted supportive care: limb elevation for edema control, intravenous fluid resuscitation, and high-protein nutritional support. On postoperative day 9, a secondary debridement was performed. The split-thickness skin grafting was performed on hospital day 21 and 44 to reconstruct the right hand defect. At last, the patient was discharged on hospital day 68. We recommend that the patient perform intensive right-hand functional exercises after discharge.
Figure 2. Clinical appearance of hemorrhagic bullae on the palmar side of the right hand.
Figure 3. Clinical appearance of mottled and tense bullae on the dorsal side of the right hand.
Figure 4. A palmar incision extending from the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint of the right middle finger to the distal one-third of the forearm.
Figure 5. A dorsal incision extending from between the third and fourth metacarpophalangeal joints of the right hand to the distal one-third of the forearm.
Table 1. Susceptibility profiles of Vibrio vulnificus isolates against tested antimicrobials.
The patient attended scheduled outpatient follow-up visits in our department at 6 months (Figure 6) and 12 months (Figure 7) post-discharge. The scar tissue at the surgical site on the patient’s right hand and forearm has demonstrated progressive color and textural alignment with surrounding healthy tissue. The right wrist and digits 1–2 of the right hand demonstrate functional range of motion. But exhibiting moderately impaired flexion in the third digit, and significantly compromised both flexion and extension functions in the fourth and fifth digits.
Figure 6. Performance of wound recovery of the patient 6 months after discharge. (a) Recovery of the wound on the dorsal side of the right hand and forearm. (b) Recovery of the wound on the palmar side of the right hand and forearm.
Figure 7. Performance of wound recovery of the patient 12 months after discharge. (a) Recovery of the wound on the dorsal side of the right hand and forearm. (b) Recovery of the wound on the palmar side of the right hand and forearm.
Discussion
Vibrio vulnificus is a bacterium found in brackish water. Human infection occurs primarily through the consumption of contaminated seafood or direct wound exposure to tainted water. V. vulnificus is a Gram-negative bacterium that was first isolated in 1964 by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (6). It has the potential to cause severe, life-threatening infections in individuals who are at high risk or particularly susceptible.
V. vulnificus abundance and virulence are closely related to water temperature. The density of V. vulnificus increases slowly at low temperatures, rapidly at normal temperatures (18 °C to 26 °C), and stops increasing at high temperatures (7). Case reports of V. vulnificus infection in China are mainly concentrated in the southeastern coastal areas (such as Taiwan, Hainan, and Guangdong, etc.), where warm water conditions are most suitable for the survival of the pathogen (8). Among them, the average annual temperature in Taiwan is above 15 °C, but the infection rate of V. vulnificus is low between December and February, which is due to the decrease in fishing activities caused by the strong northeast monsoon that usually reaches Taiwan in winter (7). Hainan Province is located in the southernmost part of China. The province is characterized by high temperature and rain throughout the year, with no cold winters. According to a survey, among the foodborne bacteria contained in shellfish in Haikou seafood market throughout the year, the content of V. vulnificus was relatively high from July to November, and reached the highest value in September of the year (9). In regions of China with distinct four seasons, the detection of V. vulnificus in aquatic products is concentrated in summer and autumn (10). This is consistent with the study of Korean scholars, who found that V. vulnificus infections related to eating raw oysters were concentrated in August and September (11). Based on the above, it can be concluded that although there are large differences in temperature changes in four seasons in different regions of China, the infection of V. vulnificus is mainly concentrated in summer and autumn when the water temperature is warmer.
V. vulnificus infection is classified into three types: primary septicemia, wound infection and gastrointestinal diseases (6). Primary sepsis and wound infection can lead to serious complications. Clinically, they are often manifested as deep soft tissue infections, and most cases often develop into necrotizing fasciitis. In contrast, the gastrointestinal type is usually self-limiting. Primary sepsis is the most common clinical manifestation, occurring after the intake of raw seafood (such as raw oysters), and mainly affects individuals with potential comorbidities such as liver diseases (12, 13). Wound infection is a less common form of infection, such as when a patient is injured in a marine environment or a pre-existing wound is exposed to seawater (14).
The timeliness of treatment for V. vulnificus infection shows a significant positive correlation with case-fatality rates (15). Data indicate a 33% fatality rate with a 24-h delay in antibiotic therapy, escalating to 100% after 72 h (16, 17). Even with early and appropriate treatment, mortality rates remain persistently high (18). The standard antibiotic treatment protocol consists of doxycycline combined with a third-generation cephalosporin. Alternative therapeutic options include either a third-generation cephalosporin paired with a fluoroquinolone or fluoroquinolone monotherapy (19, 20). In a systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2024, the authors provided a broader antibiogram by synthesizing data from 32 articles across 13 Asian countries, covering 13 major antimicrobial groups against V. vulnificus. The results confirmed that tetracyclines, quinolones, and third-generation cephalosporins have lower antimicrobial resistance, highlighting their potential as primary treatment options (21). Antimicrobial therapy should adhere to the principles of early initiation, combination regimen, and adequate dosing (22). According to reports, the treatment of severe wound infections involves combination therapy with doxycycline/fluoroquinolones plus third-generation cephalosporins, along with aggressive surgical intervention (23).
Di et al. (24) reported a case of V. vulnificus infection caused by eating seafood 3 days ago. The patient developed typical skin lesions on both lower limbs within 12 h after admission, and rapidly progressed to primary sepsis. Despite antibiotic and surgical treatment, the patient finally died 16 days after admission. In this case, the patient was diagnosed as Vibrio vulnificus bloodstream infection caused by diet. The early symptoms did not attract the attention of the patient, and it was often late when the patient visited the hospital. Feng et al. (25) reported a case of a fisherman who was cut on the skin of his left upper limb while working on a fishing boat, and then came to the hospital for treatment because the skin was ulcerated for 1 week and did not heal. The patient had a large area of skin ulceration on his left upper limb when he was treated, and he was given combined treatment of antibiotics and surgery after admission, and finally he was cured and discharged. Fortunately, in this case, the patient’s condition did not progress very rapidly, so although he was admitted to the hospital one week after the injury, the wound was extensively eroded and eventually was successfully rescued, but this was only a case, and the vast majority of patients had lost the chance of treatment at this time. Zhang et al. (26) reported a case of a 69-year-old woman who visited the hospital 2 days after being stabbed by the dorsal fin of a live fish. The doctor gave antibiotics and surgical intervention, and finally the right little finger was removed due to dry gangrene.
Our case demonstrates a V. vulnificus infection secondary to a marine-product puncture wound. Upon presentation, the patient exhibited localized skin necrosis at the right-hand wound site, accompanied by systemic manifestations including chills, high fever, nausea, vomiting, fatigue and mild drowsiness. The infection rapidly progressed to extensive tissue destruction involving the right hand and forearm. Prior to receiving the bacterial culture results from the wound secretion, we accurately diagnosed the patient with V. vulnificus infection based on their history of seafood exposure and clinical manifestations. Immediately upon admission, combination therapy with levofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and doxycycline was initiated. When the patient exhibited worsening swelling in the right wrist and forearm, accompanied by numbness and a weak radial pulse, immediate decompressive incision was performed. Postoperative wound culture results confirmed V. vulnificus infection, and the antimicrobial susceptibility testing demonstrated that the bacterium was sensitive to all three selected antibiotics.
Limitations of this case presentation:
During this treatment, we successfully saved the patient’s life and preserved their right hand, but due to fear of pain, the patient failed to adhere to postoperative rehabilitation exercises after skin grafting, resulting in partial loss of right-hand function.
Conclusion
Throughout our patient’s treatment course, accurate preliminary diagnosis, early administration of sensitive antibiotics, and timely surgical intervention successfully saved the patient’s life while preserving the function of his right hand.
Recommendations
V. vulnificus is an opportunistic human pathogen with a high mortality rate. To avoid V. vulnificus infection, people can prevent it by avoiding raw or undercooked seafood in their diet. Patients with open wounds (such as recent surgery, skin piercings, or tattoos) should avoid contact with the marine environment (do not swim or fish, etc.) and should not handle raw seafood with their bare hands. The above situation should be highly vigilant in any season, especially in the summer and autumn when the incidence is high. In clinical diagnosis and treatment, doctors need to combine the patient’s medical history and clinical manifestations, early treatment with sensitive antibiotics and timely surgical intervention for suspected V. vulnificus infection patients, which are the key to reduce disability and mortality.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in this study are included in this article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant/ patient(s) for the publication of this case report.
Author contributions
LZ: Writing – original draft. PL: Writing – review & editing. TL: Writing – original draft. WL: Writing – original draft. PX: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Blake PA, Merson MH, Weaver RE, Hollis DG, Heublein PC. Disease caused by a marine vibrio. clinical characteristics and epidemiology. N Engl J Med. (1979) 300:1–5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197901043000101
2. Huang KC, Weng HH, Yang TY, Chang TS, Huang TW, Lee MS. Distribution of fatal Vibrio vulnificus necrotizing skin and soft-tissue infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. (2016) 95:e2627. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002627
3. Bross, MH, Soch K, Morales R, Mitchell RB. Vibrio vulnificus infection: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Phys. (2007) 76:539–44.
4. Lee YC, Hor LI, Chiu HY, Lee JW, Shieh SJ. Prognostic factor of mortality and its clinical implications in patients with necrotizing fasciitis caused by Vibrio vulnificus. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. (2014) 33:1011–8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-2039-x
5. Lydon KA, Kinsey T, Le C, Gulig PA, Jones JL. Biochemical and virulence characterization of Vibrio vulnificus isolates from clinical and environmental sources. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2021) 11:637019. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.637019
6. Morris JG, Black RE. Cholera and other vibrioses in the United States. N Engl J Med. (1985) 312:343–50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198502073120604
7. Leng F, Lin S, Wu W, Zhang J, Song J, Zhong M. Epidemiology, pathogenetic mechanism, clinical characteristics, and treatment of Vibrio vulnificus infection: a case report and literature review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. (2019) 38:1999–2004. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03629-5
8. Xu S, Wu J, Jin Y, Ji L, Zou X, Hu Q, et al. Pathogenetic detection, retrospective and pathogenicity analysis of a fatal case of Vibrio vulnificus in Shenzhen. China. Gut Pathog. (2023) 15:57. doi: 10.1186/s13099-023-00580-x
9. Qingsong H, Lingxiang B, Wenhong Y, Hao S, Duyuan Z, Aimin W, et al. Annual changes in foodborne bacterial content of commercially available Hong Kong oysters and emerald mussels in Haikou. Nat Sci Hainan Univ. (2025) 43:483–90. doi: 10.15886/j.cnki.hndk.2025030901
10. Wenjuan L, Yunlong T, Wenjun W, Yan L, Xueying F, Yan S. Distribution characteristics and epidemic trend of five pathogenic Vibrio species in water and aquatic products in Yantai area. Life Sci Instruments. (2021) 19:53–7.
11. Tanveer M, Ntakiyisumba E, Kim B, Won G. Estimating risk, disease burden, and economic impact of Vibrio vulnificus infection associated with raw oyster consumption in South Korea. Appl. Food Res. (2025) 5:100820. doi: 10.1016/j.afres.2025.100820
12. Liu JW, Lee IK, Tang HJ, Ko WC, Lee HC, Liu YC, et al. Prognostic factors and antibiotics in Vibrio vulnificus septicemia. Arch Intern Med. (2006) 166:2117–23. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.19.2117
13. Tacket CO, Brenner F, Blake PA. Clinical features and an epidemiological study of Vibrio vulnificus infections. J Infect Dis. (1984) 149:558–61. doi: 10.1093/infdis/149.4.558
14. Howard RJ, Bennett NT. Infections caused by halophilic marine Vibrio bacteria. Ann Surg. (1993) 217:525–30; discussion 530–1. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199305010-00013.
15. Heng SP, Letchumanan V, Deng CY, Ab Mutalib NS, Khan TM, Chuah LH, et al. Vibrio vulnificus: an Environmental and Clinical Burden. Front Microbiol. (2017) 8:997. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00997
16. Walter K. What to know about Vibrio vulnificus. JAMA. (2023) 329:772. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.0174
17. Diaz JH. Skin and soft tissue infections following marine injuries and exposures in travelers. J Travel Med. (2014) 21:207–13. doi: 10.1111/jtm.12115
18. Borenstein M, Kerdel F. Infections with Vibrio vulnificus. Dermatol Clin. (2003) 21:245–8. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8635(02)00088-8
19. Lu ZQ, Lu CJ, Qiu QM, Pan JY, Cheng JY, Li JR, et al. [A protocol for diagnosis and treatment of Vibrio vulnificus sepsis]. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. (2008) 20:4–6.
20. Trinh SA, Gavin HE, Satchell KJF. Efficacy of ceftriaxone, cefepime, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, and combination therapy for Vibrio vulnificus foodborne septicemia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. (2017) 61:e1106–17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01106-17
21. Tanveer M, Ntakiyisumba E, Won G. Revealing antimicrobial resistance profile and associated factors of Vibrio vulnificus isolated from clinical, environmental, and seafood samples across asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heliyon. (2024) 10:e40334. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40334
22. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. (2017) 43:304–77. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6
23. Bandino JP, Hang A, Norton SA. The infectious and noninfectious dermatological consequences of flooding: a field manual for the responding provider. Am J Clin Dermatol. (2015) 16:399–424. doi: 10.1007/s40257-015-0138-4
24. Di W, Cui J, Yu H, Cui X, Sa H, Fu Z, et al. Vibrio vulnificus necrotizing fasciitis with sepsis presenting with pain in the lower legs in winter: a case report. BMC Infect Dis. (2022) 22:670. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07655-1
25. Feng H, Shi Y, Wu Z. Successful recovery of a patient with a pronounced Vibrio vulnificus infection: a case report. Asian J Surg. (2024) 47:3652–3. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.04.072
Keywords: antibiotic treatment, early diagnosis, surgical intervention, V. vulnificus infection, Vibrio vulnificus
Citation: Zhao L, Lin P, Liu T, Liu W and Xie P (2026) Vibrio vulnificus infection caused by a hand puncture wound from seafood: a case report. Front. Med. 13:1747587. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1747587
Received: 16 November 2025; Revised: 06 January 2026; Accepted: 06 January 2026;
Published: 26 January 2026.
Edited by:
Jessica L. Jones, United States Food and Drug Administration, United StatesReviewed by:
Maryum Tanveer, Jeonbuk National University, Republic of KoreaRubén Salvador-Clavell, University of Valencia, Spain
Copyright © 2026 Zhao, Lin, Liu, Liu and Xie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Peilin Xie, bHVja3hwbEAxMjYuY29t