Impact Factor 4.019
2017 JCR, Clarivate Analytics 2018

The world's most-cited Microbiology journal

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Microbiol., 20 March 2017 |

The Role of Enriched Microbial Consortium on Iron-Reducing Bioaugmentation in Sediments

Yuanyuan Pan1,2,3,4, Xunan Yang1,3,4*, Meiying Xu1,3,4 and Guoping Sun1,3,4*
  • 1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Microbial Culture Collection and Application, Guangdong Institute of Microbiology, Guangzhou, China
  • 2School of Bioscience and Bioengineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Applied Microbiology Southern China, Guangzhou, China
  • 4Guangdong Open Laboratory of Applied Microbiology, Guangzhou, China

Microbial iron reduction is an important biogeochemical process and involved in various engineered processes, including the traditional clay dyeing processes. Bioaugmentation with iron reducing bacteria (IRB) is generally considered as an effective method to enhance the activity of iron reduction. However, limited information is available about the role of IRB on bioaugmentation. To reveal the roles of introduced IRB on bioaugmentation, an IRB consortium enriched with ferric citrate was inoculated into three Fe(II)-poor sediments which served as the pigments for Gambiered Guangdong silk dyeing. After bioaugmentation, the dyeabilities of all sediments met the demands of Gambiered Guangdong silk through increasing the concentration of key agent [precipitated Fe(II)] by 35, 27, and 61%, respectively. The microbial community analysis revealed that it was the minor species but not the dominant ones in the IRB consortium that promoted the activity of iron reduction. Meanwhile, some indigenous bacteria with the potential of iron reduction, such as Clostridium, Anaeromyxobacter, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Geothrix, and Acinetobacter, were also stimulated to form mutualistic interaction with introduced consortium. Interestingly, the same initial IRB consortium led to the different community successions among the three sediments and there was even no common genus increasing or decreasing synchronously among the potential IRB of all bioaugmented sediments. The Mantel and canonical correspondence analysis showed that different physiochemical properties of sediments influenced the microbial community structures. This study not only provides a novel bioremediation method for obtaining usable sediments for dyeing Gambiered Guangdong silk, but also contributes to understanding the microbial response to IRB bioaugmentation.


Microbial iron reduction as a fundamental biogeochemical process widely exists in the freshwater sediments. It is regarded as the crucial mediator in the carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus cycles (Li et al., 2012). Furthermore, iron reduction plays an important role on degradation of organic contaminants (Zhang et al., 2013; Baek et al., 2016) and bioremediation of toxic metal compounds (Hassan et al., 2015; Si et al., 2015), and particularly, it is also vital for sediments used in environmental-friendly and traditional clay dyeing processes such as mud-tannic dyeing techniques (Pan et al., 2016). Therefore, investigating iron reduction is crucial to understand biogeochemical dynamics in natural sediment environments.

Microbial iron reduction in the sediments depends on quantity and activity of iron reducing bacteria (IRB) and the amounts of reducible Fe(III) such as amorphous Fe(III) oxides (Lovley, 2006). Therefore, in order to increase the activity of iron reduction, bioaugmentation could be an effective, economical and environmental-friendly approach to provide sufficient microbes with special functions. Since the pure specialized strains often failed to compete with indigenous bacteria in the sediment environments (Thompson et al., 2005), consortia with higher diversity were considered as a better choice to enhance the activity of iron reduction. Although a few studies have reported the possibility and efficiency of bioaugmentation with IRB to enhance iron reduction and then affect the performance of anaerobic digestion (Baek et al., 2016), the roles of microbial communities behind the effects remain unknown, such as the survival of introduced consortium and the shift of microbial communities. There are two reasons as follows. Firstly, due to insufficient sequences, the traditional molecular techniques such as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism could not exactly monitor the change of microbial communities (Gao and Tao, 2012; Baek et al., 2016). Secondly, the low resolution of traditional techniques leads to difficulty tracking the colonization and succession of the introduced microorganisms (Lentini et al., 2012), especially for IRB consortium with no specific functional gene marker. Nowadays, as the developments of the next generation sequencing, high-throughput microbial community analysis has been applied to study the dynamic succession of environmental microbial communities (Zhou et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2016). With this method, researchers could track the abundance of introduced consortium without any specific gene marker, and link the succession of microbial communities including indigenous bacteria to the change of physicochemical properties in IRB bioaugmentation system.

Currently, two kinds of viewpoints were proposed about the key factor that influenced the bioaugmentation performance with selected strains or consortia. In general, many studies found that the survival and function of introduced strains were the vital factors influencing the bioaugmentation performance (Herrero and Stuckey, 2015; Baek et al., 2016). In contrast, several studies suggested that there was no direct relation between the abundance of introduced strains and bioaugmentation performance. They speculated that the shift of indigenous microbial community enhanced the performance (Qu et al., 2015; Xun et al., 2015). In terms of the bioaugmentation of IRB consortium, it still needs further investigation to ensure which factor affects the iron respiration activity.

In this study, amending the sediment for Gambiered Guangdong silk was served as a case to study microbial effects during IRB bioaugmentation. Generally, traditional dyeing crafts were obtained through the reaction between the ferric iron clay minerals (e.g., goethite, hematite, palygorskite, and akaganeite) and natural organic dyes, for example, the well-known Maya Blue (Van Olphen, 1966), Bogolan cloth in Mali (Hilu and Hersey, 2005), and Amami Oshima Tsumugi (Wakimoto et al., 2004). Nevertheless, the sediment with abundant precipitated Fe(II) was vital for Gambiered Guangdong silk and it reacted with tannins pre-adsorbed on the silk to form shiny black color (Pan et al., 2016). Usually, the available sediment could be obtained from natural environments. However, with the increasing water pollution, clean sediment is decreasing dramatically. Bioaugmentation with IRB could be a potential technology for exploring new sources of ideal sediment and increasing the recycle and re-use rate of sediment. Unfortunately, very limited information was available on this sustainable method. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to (1) evaluate the feasibility of bioaugmenting three Fe(II)-poor sediments with the enriched IRB consortium; (2) explore microbial response including indigenous and exogenous microbes to IRB bioaugmentation via high-throughput sequencing; and (3) identify the dominant microorganisms which promoted sediment dyeability.

Materials and Methods


Three original river sediments (Orig-SD1, Orig-SD2, and Orig-CH) were collected from creeks in Pearl River Delta, China. Sediments were passed through a 100-mesh standard sieve (0.15 mm opening size) and kept in a cold room (4°C) in darkness for later use. Orig-SD1 and Orig-SD2 were identified as useable sediments because fabrics coated with them met the color demand of Gambiered Guangdong silk (one side: shiny black; the other side: brown; Pan et al., 2016), while Orig-CH was unusable. The physicochemical characteristics and performance details of these three original sediments were listed in Supplementary Table S1. In order to test the bioaugmentation performance, three modified sediments with little ferrous were considered, including high temperature (121°C) and pressure (0.1 MPa) oxidized Orig-SD1 (SD1), air-dried Orig-SD2 (SD2), and unusable Orig-CH (CH).

The silk textiles used in this study were prepared in the ChengYi factory (Foshan, China), which has been dyed with the tannin extract of Ju-liang roots to form a brown color. The prepared textiles (Orig-textile, the color characteristics seen in Table 1) were cut into 2 cm × 2 cm square pieces for sediment coating.


TABLE 1. Color characteristics of mud inoculated with or without the enriched IRB consortium.

Enrichment Culture of IRB

Enrichment cultures were prepared in 20-mL serum bottles containing 15 mL ferric citrate medium (g L-1: ferric citrate, 3.4; NH4Cl, 1.0; KHPO4, 0.25; K2HPO4.3H2O, 0.72; CaCl2.2H2O, 0.07; MgSO4.7H2O, 0.6; and glucose, 10) and 1 g Orig-SD1 as the inoculants which were sealed with Teflon-coated butyl rubber septa and aluminum crimp caps (Wang et al., 2008). All culture bottles were incubated at 30°C in the dark. The consortium was subcultured in a new serum bottle with 15 mL fresh culture medium once the enrichment cultures turned light green or colorless from yellow color (2–7 days, given by ferric citrate redox indicator). The subculture was consecutively repeated five times. The IRB culture was washed twice and then suspended with sterilized deionized water (OD600 = 1.0) before it was used as bioaugmentation inoculants.

Bioaugmentation Process

The bioaugmentation experiment procedures are follows: an aliquot (3 g) of the unusable sediments (SD1, SD2, and CH) transferred into the 10-mL vial. Three milliliters of enriched consortium were added into the three sediments, uniformly mixed and cultured at 30°C in the dark for 7 days (SD1S, SD2S, and CHS). Sediments added with sterilized water were used as controls (SD1W, SD2W, and CHW). Each treatment was with three replicates. After 7 days, all sediments with and without bioaugmentation were used to coat the textiles prepared as mentioned above. After reacting for 1 h, the rest sediment on the textile was washed away and the textiles were dried in the sun.

Characteristics of Inoculated Sediments and Sediment-Coated Textiles

After incubation, a thin layer of sediment was used to coat the Orig-textile for 1 h according to our previous method (Pan et al., 2016) and then the rest sediment was washed away. The color characteristics of both sides of sediment-coated textiles were evaluated with the Commission International d’Eclairage (CIE) Lab coordinates by USPRO Colorimeter (Datacolor 110TM, USA). Optical source was D65, viewing angle 10° and measure diameter 10 mm. The CIELAB color system is organized with three axes in a spherical form: L, a, and b. L is associated with the lightness of the color and moves from top (100, white) to bottom (0, black), whereas a and b are associated with changes in redness–greenness (positive a is red and negative a is green) and in yellowness–blueness (positive b is yellow and negative b is blue). The L, a, and b were calculated from three repetitive measurements for every sample. And color difference (ΔE) between textile samples was used as the indicator on judging the dyeability of sediments and calculated according to the Eq. 1. From the point of technical dyeing using natural raw dyes, a somewhat wider color difference of ΔE ≤ 3 could be permitted with the use of natural resources (Martínez et al., 2001).


Li, ai, bi: color values of the i textile;

Lj, aj, bj: color values of the j textile.

The sediment pH and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) were monitored with a S20 K pH meter (Mettler Toledo, Switzerland). The organic matter content was estimated according to the previous method (Haller et al., 2011) except extended to 4 h. HCl-extractable Fe(II) and total Fe (TFe) in the sediment were extracted with 0.5 mol/L HCl for 1 h (Lovley and Phillips, 1987). After centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 5 min, the supernatant was determined using the 1,10-phenanthroline colorimetric method at 510 nm on a full wavelength scanner (Thermo Scientific, MULTISKAN GO). TFe including Fe(III) and Fe(II) in the sediment was extracted with hydroxylamine hydrochloride and determined as the Fe(II) determination (Lovley and Phillips, 1987).

DNA Extraction and Sequencing

DNA was extracted from 250 mg of sediment samples using the PowerSoilTM DNA Isolation Kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The bacterial 16S rRNA genes were amplified using the PCR primers 515f/806r targeting the V4 region (Pylro et al., 2014). To distinguish the different samples, a Barcoded-tag with six nucleotide bases was randomly added to the upstream of the universal primer. The primers which were added with Barcoded-tag sequences were Barcoded-tag fusion primers. After quantification and quality control, PCR products were gradually diluted and quantified. The V4 tag PCR products were pooled with the other samples and sequenced using 300 bp paired-end model with the Illumina MiSeq platform at Chengdu Institute of Biology (Chengdu, China).

Sequence Data Analysis

After sequencing, the final V4 tag sequences were assembled through finding the overlap between paired-end reads by the FLASH software. Chimeras were identified via UCHIME algorithm on mothur platform. Low quality fragments were filtered out using QIIME software. Sequences were clustered to operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% sequence similarity by using UCLUST software (Edgar, 2010). Singletons were removed from the whole sequence data set and each sample was randomly sampled and normalized at 11,000 sequences. The numbers of original reads and final OTUs are listed in Supplementary Table S2. The dissimilarity test [non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS)] based on Bray–Curtis similarity distance matrices were performed by the Vegan package in R 3.1.3. The dominant OTUs in each group were depicted in a heat map conducted with R 3.1.3, and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was used to analyze the relationship between these OTUs and sediment properties with Mantel test. The Illumina sequence raw data reported here was submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive ( under accession number SRP083001.


Performance of Bioaugmented Sediments

After 7-day incubation, all of the three bioaugmented sediments (SD1S, SD2S, and CHS) revealed higher dyeabilities than their control groups (Table 1). The bioaugmented sediments performed shiny black color on the sediment-coated side (LSD1S = 23.11; LSD2S = 24.91; LCHS = 24.86), comparable with the standard cloth dyed with Orig-SD1 (ΔE < 3). Furthermore, the bioaugmented sediments did not penetrate to the back and the backside still kept brown (ΔESD1S = 2.97; ΔESD2S = 1.41; ΔECHS = 0.84), which met the demand of two tone colors for Gambiered Guangdong silk. In contrast, the control sediments (SD1W, SD2W, and CHW) still kept the original brown color (LSD1W = 29.51; LSD2W = 26.11; LCHW = 28.52), near to the color of Orig-textile (LOrig-textile = 28.17).

Sediment Properties

In order to clarify the influences of IRB inoculation on sediment dyeability, characteristics of sediments were investigated (Table 2). The pH and LOI of the bioaugmented groups showed a slight increase and decrease, respectively, compared to the control group, except for the pH of SD1S. As expected, the concentration of HCl-extractable Fe(II) in bioaugmented sediments were significantly higher than those in controls (p < 0.01), increasing by 3.5-, 12-, and 83-fold, while there was no significant change in HCl-extractable TFe (Table 2). In addition, the ORP results were well consistent with the Fe(II) results: the controls had positive ORP with oxidizing conditions while the IRB bioaugmented groups had negative ORP with reducing conditions for iron reducing.


TABLE 2. Physiochemical characteristics and dyeability evaluation of sediments inoculated with or without iron reducing consortium.

Microbial Community Analysis in Enriched IRB Consortium and Sediments

Eleven thousand effective sequences were re-sampled from each sediment sample, resulting in 1,440–3,759 OTUs at 97% sequence identify cutoff (Supplementary Table S2) and being assigned to different taxa (Figure 1). In the enriched iron reducing consortium, Firmicutes (77.4%) was the overwhelmingly dominant phylum, followed by Proteobacteria with 11.0%. Among the Firmicutes phylum, nearly 44.3% sequences was assigned to genus Clostridium. At the OTU level, one-third sequences were assigned to Clostridium sp. (denovo 173227).


FIGURE 1. Diversity in the bacteria communities at the phylum level in response to iron reducing consortium treatments for the three sediments, identified by 16S rRNA gene sequences. The bacterial phyla represented by >1% of total sequences are presented here. Phylum making up less than 1% of the total sequences were classified as others.

The NMDS analysis was applied to analyze sediments microbial communities with and without bioaugmentation. Although the data points of sediments with the same source were adjacent, there was a distinction between bioaugmented and non-bioaugmentation samples. Moreover, the succession of microbial communities proceeded in different directions of community succession (Figure 2).


FIGURE 2. Comparing the microbial communities between inoculated groups and the controls using NMDS analysis at the genus level.

In details, in terms of the phylum level (Figure 1), Firmicutes and Proteobacteria dominated in SD1 and SD2, while the CH community was mainly dispersed by Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. After bioaugmentation, the average abundance of Firmicutes increased from 55.3% (SD1W), 4.6% (SD2W), and 6.2% (CHW) to 59.7% (SD1S), 35.6% (SD2S), and 8.3% (CHS), respectively, but total percentages of Proteobacteria in all sediments decreased, even by 8.2% for SD1S. At the genus level (Supplementary Figure S1), bioaugmentation with IRB consortium led to a significant increase in the relative abundance of genera Symbiobacterium (by 24.0%), Planctomyces (by 1.1%), Geobacter (by 0.2%), Novosphingobium (by 5.8%), and Nevskia (by 1.7%) in SD1; Clostridium (by 3.0%), Bacillus (by 13.9%), Brevibacillus (by 2.8%), and Janthinobacterium (by 1.6%) in SD2; Clostridium (by 0.9%), Anaeromyxobacter (by 0.6%), and Geothrix (by 0.5%) in CH. In addition, the dominant 38 OTUs (>1% total sequences for each sample) of all the samples were analyzed (Figure 3), which were mainly composed of Firmicutes (17 OTUs) and Proteobacteria (12 OTUs). The major species (e.g., denovo 173227) in the IRB consortium showed no dominant position in bioaugmented sediments. The number of the significantly increased OTUs in bioaugmented sediments were 8 (SD1S), 5 (SD2S), and 6 (CHS), respectively, and some of these OTUs were different among the three sediments. Moreover, some sediment-specific (indigenous) IRB increased and be only found in their corresponding sediment (Supplementary Table S3).


FIGURE 3. Heatmap of the enriched iron reducing consortium and sediments with and without inoculation based on the log10 (sequence numbers +1) of the 38 OTUs whose reads occupied above 1% of total sequences. The phylum, family, and genus for each OTU were showed in the figure. and ∗∗ indicated this OTU with a significant increase in the inoculated sediments (SD1S, SD2S, and CHS) compared to the relative controls (SD1W, SD2W, and CHW). 0.01 < p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01.

Potential IRB

The relative abundance of potential iron reducers were listed in Table 3. The genus Clostridium was the most abundant genus in the IRB consortium, but just occupied 1.11, 3.55, and 1.20% in SD1S, SD2S, and CHS, respectively. Pseudomonas (11.64%) was the most abundant genus of IRB in SD1S. Bacillus (14.19%) and Brevibacillus (2.84%) were the predominant iron-reducing genus in SD2S and increased by 50- and 46-fold, respectively, compared with the SD2W. Differently, the iron reducing genera for CHS were dispersed and composed of Anaeromyxobacter (1.37%) and Geothrix (1.07%) both increased by about twofold. The significantly increased OTUs in the sediments but not in the IRB consortium (Supplementary Table S3), were classified to several genera which were reported to own the ability of iron reduction such as Anaeromyxobacter (Breidenbach et al., 2015), Bacillus (Alabbas et al., 2013), Clostridium (Hassan et al., 2015), Azospira (Peng et al., 2016) Paenibacillus (Petrie et al., 2003), Desulfosporosinus (Bertel et al., 2012), and Treponema (Baek et al., 2016).


TABLE 3. The potential iron reducing bacteria in different phylogenetic OTUs taxa obtained by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes using Miseq platforms.

Relationship between Microbial Community and Sediment Properties

Significant correlation was observed between the composition of the bacterial community (OTU level) and physiochemical properties [pH, ORP, Fe(III), LOI] of sediments with different sources through the Mantel test (p < 0.01) and canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) (Figure 4). CCA showed the first two components (CCA1 and CCA2) together explained 76.68% of the total variation of sediment microbial community. Although some parameters [e.g., Fe(II) and ORP] had significant changes after bioaugmentation (Table 2), greater sediment-to-sediment difference than treatment-to-control in CCA profile (Figure 4) implied that the whole physiochemical properties were the substantive influence on the bacterial community constitution.


FIGURE 4. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of microbial community structures (OTUs) from six sediment samples with respect to the four environmental variables. Arrows indicate the direction and magnitude of measurable variables associated with community structures.


While microbial iron reduction in the sediment environments has been concerned for several decades, little has been done to characterize bioaugmented iron reduction with IRB consortium. In this study, we successfully enhanced iron reduction and then achieved the goal of improving the sediment dyeability for Gambiered Guangdong Silk by inoculating enriched IRB consortium (Table 1). As expected, the concentrations of HCl-extractable ferrous in all the bioaugmented sediments increased by 35% (SD1), 26% (SD2), and 61% (CH) comparing with the control groups, respectively (Table 2). Meanwhile, the negative ORP with reducing conditions favored the precipitation of ferrous (Bongoua-Devisme et al., 2013). These results were coincident with our previous study which suggested that precipitated ferrous iron in the sediment was the key factor for the success of dyeing technique of Gambiered Guangdong silk (Pan et al., 2016).

To explain that the enhanced iron reduction was ascribed to either the survival of introduced IRB consortium or the shift of indigenous microorganisms, the microbial communities were taken insight through high-throughput technique. In general, the dominant bacteria would be responsible for the enhanced performance. Unexpectedly, the dominant specie (denovo 173227) in enriched IRB consortium, which accounted for 42.95% of total sequences and assigned to potential iron-reducing genus Clostridium (Li et al., 2011; Peng et al., 2016), did not proliferate significantly in bioaugmented sediments and only accounted for little percentages (0.22, 0.21, and 0%, respectively, in SD1S, SD2S, and CHS). Moreover, the other major OTUs in the consortium also lost their dominant position after augmented into sediments (Figure 3), which implied the uncertain risk in using the well-growing strains as the augmentation agent. In this study, however, the bioaugmentation was success, which might be attributed to the minor species in the inoculums. Minor species are considered as the seed bank in a microbial community (Pedrós-Alió, 2006; Campbell et al., 2011) and serve as the keystone within complex consortia with the potential to become dominant in response to shifts in environmental conditions (Sogin et al., 2006). These minor species survived in new environment and were responsible for iron reducing function (Figure 3 and Tables 2, 3). As Figure 3 illustrated, the minor OTUs once in consortium substantially showed higher abundances in bioaugmented sediments than those in relative controls, and most of them were assigned to several potential iron-reducing genera, such as Bacillus, Brevibacillus, Clostridium, and Pseudomonas (Table 3). In addition, some indigenous OTUs (only observed in sediments) also increased after bioaugmentation (Supplementary Table S3), which might be attributed to the mutualism that the exogenous species collaborate with the indigenous IRB and perform higher exploitability of Fe(III). These stimulated bacteria and survival species in the consortium formed a multispecies interactive network. Therefore, iron reduction could be functioned not only through proliferating the exogenous minor taxa but also collaborators with the indigenous IRB.

Interestingly, as the Table 3 and Figures 2, 3 shown, the same consortium had triggered the succession in different directions. These might be attributed to the differences in the sediment characteristics (Böer et al., 2009). Distinct OTUs had a differential niche adaptation and tended to adapt to changes in their environments (Storey et al., 2015). Some members might extinct due to poor ability to adapt to changing environments, while others could proliferate in the new environments (Faust and Raes, 2012). Eventually, the relative balanced state of community structure was formed based on the physicochemical characteristics (Zhou et al., 2014; Qu et al., 2015; Sanders, 2016). In the present study, significant correlation was definitely observed between the composition of the bacterial community and such properties of sediments with different sources through the Mantel test (p < 0.01) and CCA (Figure 4). Furthermore, the bacterial community structure analysis showed reproducible inter-groups and significantly different intra-groups (Figures 2, 4). The results indicated that the environment conditions influenced the microbial communities, which also explained the reason that specific IRB played the roles in different sediments (Table 3). That is, because of the allopatric speciation, the same consortium formed different functional assemblies. This implied that inoculating a consortium was equivalent to providing a function library (seed bank); the key contributors, who might used to be minor species, would function in compatible environment. Therefore, it is also suggested that bioaugmentation with microbial consortia might be a better choice than with specialized strains, due to their adaptation to a wider environmental conditions as well as their synergistic interactions.


The findings demonstrated that sediments bioaugmented with enriched IRB consortium obtained good dyeability for Gambiered Guangdong silk due to the increased Fe(II) concentration. The bioaugmentation process facilitated iron reduction through the mutualism interaction between survived minor species from the IRB consortium and some stimulated indigenous bacteria including Clostridium, Anaeromyxobacter, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Geothrix, and Acinetobacter. Meanwhile, due to the different physiochemical properties, the same IRB consortium led to the community successions on different directions in the three sediments. This study suggested that consortium might be a better choice than pure strains because of a lower requirement for environmental conditions.

Author Contributions

YP designed the study, performed experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript; XY analyzed the data, interpreted the results, and revised the manuscript; MX and GS revised the manuscript and approved the final version.


This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51508111), Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China (Nos. 2014A020220006, 2016B070701017, and 2013B091500081), and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (No. 2014A030310140).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


The authors acknowledge the kind help of Zhu Liang (one of the two inheritors for the dyeing technique of Gambiered Guangdong silk, China) for providing textiles and introducing us to dyeing processes.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at:


Alabbas, F. M., Bhola, S. M., Spear, J. R., Olson, D. L., and Mishra, B. (2013). The shielding effect of wild type iron reducing bacteria flora in the corrosion of linepipe steel. Eng. Fail. Anal. 33, 222–225. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.05.020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baek, G., Kim, J., Shin, S. G., and Lee, C. (2016). Bioaugmentation of anaerobic sludge digestion with iron-reducing bacteria: process and microbial responses to variations in hydraulic retention time. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100, 927–937. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7018-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bertel, D., Peck, J., Quick, T. J., and Senko, J. M. (2012). Iron transformations induced by an acid-tolerant Desulfosporosinus species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 81–88. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06337-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Böer, S. I., Hedtkamp, S. I. C., van Beusekom, J. E. E., and Ramette, A. (2009). Time- and sediment depth-related variations in bacterial diversity and community structure in subtidal sands. ISME J. 3, 780–791. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.29

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bongoua-Devisme, A. J., Cébron, A., Kassin, K. E., and Berthelin, J. (2013). Microbial communities involved in Fe reduction and mobility during soil organic matter (SOM) mineralization in two contrasted paddy soils. Geomicrobiol. J. 30, 347–361. doi: 10.1080/01490451.2012.688928

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Breidenbach, B., Pump, J., and Dumont, M. G. (2015). Microbial community structure in the Rhizosphere of rice plants. Front. Microbiol. 6:1537. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01537

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Campbell, B. J., Yu, L., Heidelberg, J. F., and Kirchman, D. L. (2011). Activity of abundant and rare bacteria in a coastal ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 12776–12781. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101405108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ding, L., Su, J., Xu, H., Jia, Z., and Zhu, Y. (2015). Long-term nitrogen fertilization of paddy soil shifts iron-reducing microbial community revealed by RNA-13C-acetate probing coupled with pyrosequencing. ISME J. 9, 721–734. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.159

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Edgar, R. C. (2010). Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Faust, K., and Raes, J. (2012). Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 538–550. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2832

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, D. W., and Tao, Y. (2012). Current molecular biologic techniques for characterizing environmental microbial community. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 1, 82–97. doi: 10.1007/s11783-011-0306-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haller, L., Tonolla, M., Zopfi, J., Peduzzi, R., Wildi, W., and Poté, J. (2011). Composition of bacterial and archaeal communities in freshwater sediments with different contamination levels (Lake Geneva, Switzerland). Water Res. 45, 1213–1228. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.11.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hassan, Z., Sultana, M., Westerhoff, H. V., Khan, S. I., and Röling, W. F. M. (2015). Iron cycling potentials of arsenic contaminated groundwater in Bangladesh as revealed by enrichment cultivation. Geomicrobiol. J. 33, 779–792. doi: 10.1080/01490451.2015.1111471

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Herrero, M., and Stuckey, D. C. (2015). Bioaugmentation and its application in wastewater treatment: a review. Chemosphere 140, 119–128. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hilu, S., and Hersey, I. (2005). Bogolanfini Mud Cloth. Atglen, PA: Schiffer Publishing Ltd.

Google Scholar

Lentini, C. J., Wankel, S. D., and Hansel, C. M. (2012). Enriched iron(III)-reducing bacterial communities are shaped by carbon substrate and iron oxide mineralogy. Front. Microbiol. 3:404. doi: 10.3389/fmib.2012.00404

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, H., Peng, J., Weber, K. A., and Zhu, Y. (2011). Phylogenetic diversity of Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms in rice paddy soil: enrichment cultures with different short-chain fatty acids as electron donors. J. Soils Sediments 11, 1234–1242. doi: 10.1007/s11368-011-0371-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Yu, S., Strong, J., and Wang, H. (2012). Are the biogeochemical cycles of carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus driven by the “FeIII-FeII redox wheel” in dynamic redox environments? J. Soils Sed. 12, 683–693. doi: 10.1007/s11368-012-0507-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lovley, D. R. (2006). Dissimilatory Fe(III)- and Mn(IV)-Reducing Prokaryotes. (New York, NY: Springer), 635–658. doi: 10.1007/0-387-30742-721

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lovley, D. R., and Phillips, E. J. P. (1987). Rapid assay for microbially reducible ferric iron in aquatic sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53, 1536–1540.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Martínez, J. A., Melgosa, M., Pérez, M., and Hita, E. (2001). Visual and instrumental color evaluation in red wines. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 7, 439–444. doi: 10.1106/VFAT-5REN-1WK2-5JGQ

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Naganuma, T., Sato, M., Hoshii, D., Amano-Murakami, Y., Iwatsuki, T., and Mandemack, K. W. (2006). Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas strains capable of Fe(III) reduction with reference to redox response regulator genes. Geomicrobiol. J. 23, 145–155. doi: 10.1080/01490450600596565

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nevin, K. P., and Lovley, D. R. (2002). Mechanisms for accessing insoluble Fe(III) oxide during dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction by Geothrix fermentans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 2294–2299. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.5.2294-2299.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pan, Y., Yang, X., Chen, X., Xu, M., and Sun, G. (2016). The right mud: studies in the mud-coating technique of Gambiered Guangdong silk. Appl. Clay Sci. 135, 516–520. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2016.09.024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pedrós-Alió, C. (2006). Marine microbial diversity: can it be determined? Trends Microbiol. 14, 257–263. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2006.04.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peng, Q., Shaaban, M., Wu, Y., Hu, R., Wang, B., and Wang, J. (2016). The diversity of iron reducing bacteria communities in subtropical paddy soils of China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 101, 20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.01.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Petrie, L., North, N. N., Dollhopf, S. L., Balkwill, D. L., and Kostka, J. E. (2003). Enumeration and characterization of iron (III)-reducing microbial communities from acidic subsurface sediments contaminated with uranium (VI). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 7467–7479. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7467-7479.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pylro, V. S., Roesch, L. F. W., Morais, D. K., Clark, L. M., Hirsch, P. R., and Tótola, M. R. (2014). Data analysis for 16S microbial profiling from different benchtop sequencing platforms. J. Microbiol. Methods 107, 30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2014.08.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qu, Y., Zhang, X., Ma, Q., Deng, J., Deng, Y., Van Nostrand, J. D., et al. (2015). Microbial community dynamics and activity link to indigo production from indole in bioaugmented activated sludge systems. PLoS ONE 10:e0138455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138455

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanders, M. E. (2016). Probiotics and microbiota composition. BMC Med. 14:82. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0629-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Si, Y., Zou, Y., Liu, X., Si, X., and Mao, J. (2015). Mercury methylation coupled to iron reduction by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria. Chemosphere 122, 206–212. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sogin, M. L., Morrison, H. G., Huber, J. A., Mark Welch, D., Huse, S. M., Neal, P. R., et al. (2006). Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare biosphere”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 12115–12120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605127103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Storey, S., Chualain, D. N., Doyle, O., Clipson, N., and Doyle, E. (2015). Comparison of bacterial succession in green waste composts amended with inorganic fertilizer and wastewater treatment plant sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 179, 71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.107

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thompson, I. P., van der Gast, C. J., Ciric, I., and Singer, A. C. (2005). Bioaugmentation for bioremediation: the challenge of strain selection. Environ. Microbiol. 7, 909–915. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00804.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Olphen, H. (1966). Maya blue: a clay-organic pigment? Science 154, 645–646. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3749.645

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wakimoto, R., Tazaki, K., Nawatani, N., Ikeda, Y., Imai, S., Sato, K., et al. (2004). Characterization of muddy clays for “Oshima Tsumugi” using traditional dye method. Earth Sci. 58, 199–214.

Google Scholar

Wang, W., Qu, D., and Xu, J. (2008). Isolation of iron-reducing bacteria in paddy soil and its Fe(III) reduction potential analysis. Nat. Sci. Educ. 36, 103–107.

Xun, W., Huang, T., Zhao, J., Ran, W., Wang, B., Shen, Q., et al. (2015). Environmental conditions rather than microbial consortium composition determine the bacterial composition, microbial biomass and enzymatic activity of reconstructed soil microbial communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 90, 10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, T., Tremblay, P. L., Chaurasia, A. K., Smith, J. A., Bain, T. S., and Lovely, D. R. (2013). Anaerobic benzene oxidation via phenol in Geobacter metallireducens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 7800–7806. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03134-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, X., Yang, J., Bai, S., Ma, F., and Wang, L. (2016). Microbial population dynamics in response to bioaugmentation in a constructed wetland system under 10°C. Bioresour. Technol. 205, 166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, J., Deng, Y., Zhang, P., Xue, K., Liang, Y., Van Nostrand, J. D., et al. (2014). Stochasticity, succession, and environmental perturbations in a fluidic ecosystem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 836–845. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324044111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: iron reducing bacteria, bioaugmentation, consortium, river sediments, high-throughput sequencing, microbial response

Citation: Pan Y, Yang X, Xu M and Sun G (2017) The Role of Enriched Microbial Consortium on Iron-Reducing Bioaugmentation in Sediments. Front. Microbiol. 8:462. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00462

Received: 06 December 2016; Accepted: 06 March 2017;
Published: 20 March 2017.

Edited by:

Diana Elizabeth Marco, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientficas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina

Reviewed by:

Seung Gu Shin, Pohang University of Science and Technology, South Korea
Jun-Jie Zhang, Indiana University School of Medicine, USA

Copyright © 2017 Pan, Yang, Xu and Sun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Guoping Sun, Xunan Yang,