Impact Factor 4.019
2017 JCR, Clarivate Analytics 2018

The world's most-cited Microbiology journal

Methods ARTICLE

Front. Microbiol., 18 December 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03153

qPCR Assays for the Detection and Quantification of Multiple Paralytic Shellfish Toxin-Producing Species of Alexandrium

Rendy Ruvindy1*, Christopher J. Bolch2, Lincoln MacKenzie3, Kirsty F. Smith3 and Shauna A. Murray1*
  • 1Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • 2Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia
  • 3Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand

Paralytic shellfish toxin producing dinoflagellates have negatively impacted the shellfish aquaculture industry worldwide, including in Australia and New Zealand. Morphologically identical cryptic species of dinoflagellates that may differ in toxicity, in particular, species of the former Alexandrium tamarense species complex, co-occur in Australia, as they do in multiple regions in Asia and Europe. To understand the dynamics and the ecological drivers of the growth of each species in the field, accurate quantification at the species level is crucial. We have developed the first quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) primers for A. australiense, and new primers targeting A. ostenfeldii, A. catenella, and A. pacificum. We showed that our new primers for A. pacificum are more specific than previously published primer pairs. These assays can be used to quantify planktonic cells and cysts in the water column and in sediment samples with limits of detection of 2 cells/L for the A. catenella and A. australiense assays, 2 cells/L and 1 cyst/mg sediment for the A. pacificum assay, and 1 cells/L for the A. ostenfeldii assay, and efficiencies of >90%. We utilized these assays to discriminate and quantify co-occurring A. catenella, A. pacificum, and A. australiense in samples from the east coast of Tasmania, Australia.

Introduction

Of all paralytic shellfish toxin (PSTs) producing dinoflagellates, species of the genus Alexandrium are the most widely distributed around the globe, with planktonic cells found from sub-Arctic regions to the tropics (Anderson, 1997; Usup et al., 2002; McCauley et al., 2009; Brown et al., 2010; Ho et al., 2012; Gao et al., 2015a; Salgado et al., 2015). In Australia, past surveys of Alexandrium species indicate the presence of Alexandrium pacificum and Alexandrium australiense along the coast of the states of New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria, down to Port Lincoln in South Australia, including the east coast of Tasmania (Hallegraeff et al., 1991; Bolch and de Salas, 2007; Farrell et al., 2013; Bolch et al., 2014). Planktonic cells of Alexandrium catenella [previously known as Alexandrium fundyense, Group 1 genotype (Prud’homme and van Reine, 2017)] on the other hand, have only been detected in Tasmania, along the east coast down to the western bays of the Tasman peninsula (Bolch et al., 2014; Hallegraeff et al., 2018). Alexandrium ostenfeldii has been identified across estuaries in NSW (Farrell et al., 2013). In New Zealand, A. australiense and A. catenella have not been observed to date. However, in the Bay of Plenty in the North Island of New Zealand, the two PST producing species A. pacificum and A. minutum bloom regularly, especially after summer storms (Rhodes and Mackenzie, 2001; MacKenzie, 2014).

As well as living as planktonic cells, Alexandrium spp. undergo sexual reproduction, which results in the formation of resting cyst layers on coastal sediments (Anderson, 1998). These cysts can germinate at the right environmental conditions and become the precursor for a bloom (Bravo et al., 2010; Moore et al., 2015). The cysts of A. ostenfeldii and A. pacificum have also been detected in several sampling locations in New Zealand, and Tasmania and New South Wales states in Australia (Bolch and Hallegraeff, 1990; Mackenzie et al., 1996; Bolch, 1997; MacKenzie, 2014).

PSTs produced by Alexandrium species cause the human illness Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning (PSP), posing a serious public health and economic threat to the local communities worldwide (Hallegraeff, 1993). It also affects the shellfish aquaculture industry in New Zealand and Australia, which is a significant contributor to the local economy, valued at approximately USD 188 million in New Zealand and USD 100.9 million in Australia (Aquaculture New Zealand, 2012; Mobsby and Koduah, 2017). Blooms of PST-producing species have been recorded in shellfish intensive areas in Australia and New Zealand (Ajani et al., 2001, 2011; MacKenzie et al., 2004; Harwood et al., 2013), resulting in product recall and farm closures. In New Zealand, blooms of A. pacificum started to impact the important aquaculture region in Queen Charlotte Sound on 2011, with the numbers reaching 1.3 × 105 cells/L and toxicity of 17 mg STX equivalents/kg in the mussel species Perna canaliculus, within a month after the first cell was observed (MacKenzie, 2014). In December 2012, a poisoning incident in the Bay of Plenty was caused by an A. minutum bloom (MacKenzie, 2014). Currently, the aquaculture industry is under development in this region, and the inherent risk of Alexandrium blooms is an important consideration. An improved understanding of the ecology of A. pacificum and A. minutum, will aid in assessing the risk of PST blooms in this region.

PST-producing blooms of A. pacificum and A. catenella have been recorded in Australia and New Zealand (Ajani et al., 2001, 2011; MacKenzie, 2014; Hallegraeff et al., 2018), and the species A. australiense and A. ostenfeldii also occur (Murray et al., 2012; Ajani et al., 2013; Farrell et al., 2013). Little is known regarding the dynamics and environmental drivers underlying blooms of each species in this region. In particular cases, more than one species can co-occur during a bloom (Hallegraeff et al., 2018). Co-occurrences of cryptic Alexandrium species during blooms have also been reported in the United Kingdom (Toebe et al., 2013; Eckford-Soper et al., 2016), Ireland (Touzet et al., 2010), the Mediterranean (Penna et al., 2008) and Korea (Shin et al., 2017). Environmental factors such as seasonality, temperature, rainfall, parasitism and other factors influencing the growth, development and decline of blooms of Alexandrium species is species-specific, and therefore, accurate quantification at the species level is vital (MacKenzie et al., 2004; Orr et al., 2011; Murray et al., 2012; Hackett et al., 2013).

In general, the few previous studies of Alexandrium in Australia have used light microscopy to identify species (Hallegraeff et al., 1991; Bolch and de Salas, 2007; Farrell et al., 2013). One of the crucial limitations of this method is its inability to discern species with morphological features that are not distinguishable, or overlap, which is the case for A. pacificum, A. catenella, and A. australiense. While these species are not distinguishable based on their morphology, they have been identified as part of the former A. tamarense species complex and can be distinguished by clear genetic differences (Scholin et al., 1994; John, 2004; Lilly et al., 2007; John et al., 2014). For cyst identification, the use of optical microscopy may also not be the most reliable method, as the cyst morphology can be very similar for species within the genus Alexandrium (Kamikawa et al., 2005) and species confirmation is required through germination. Therefore, a method that is able to detect and identify the species of Alexandrium cysts will be useful.

The development of molecular genetic methods to detect and enumerate harmful algal bloom forming species, such as microarrays, next generation sequencing, and quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) has been rapid (Lilly et al., 2007; Ebenezer et al., 2012; John et al., 2014; Medlin and Orozco, 2017). Apart from their sensitivity, molecular methods allow for high throughput sample analysis. Platform such as qPCR have grown in popularity due to their sensitivity and specificity (Penna and Galluzzi, 2013), as well as their speed and lower cost in comparison to light microscopy-based identification (Dias et al., 2015). Species-specific qPCR assays have been developed to identify cysts and motile cells of A. catenella, A. pacificum, and A. ostenfeldii utilizing ribosomal gene regions as targets (Hosoi-Tanabe and Sako, 2005; Erdner et al., 2010; Vandersea et al., 2017). However, no assay has yet been developed for A. australiense, and the specificity of previously published assays has not been thoroughly tested in the laboratory. The only published assay for detecting A. ostenfeldii was not ideal, as it did not show a strong correlation with cell counts through other methods (R2 = 0.44, Vandersea et al., 2017).

An assay based on a functional gene target involved in PST biosynthesis (sxtA4) has been developed (Murray et al., 2011; Gao et al., 2015b; Penna et al., 2015). This method has shown high levels of efficiency and specificity to PST producing dinoflagellates, and has also been trialed in shellfish meat as an indicator of meat toxicity (Farrell et al., 2016). The qPCR assay based on sxtA outperformed qPCR methods targeting rDNA in several ways, such as the consistency of results among sites (Murray et al., 2011; Gao et al., 2015b; Penna et al., 2015), and is therefore useful as a monitoring tool. However, it does not allow for the identification of individual species, which is required in order to investigate the ecological parameters related to bloom formation of individual species.

In this study, we developed and analyzed the specificity and the efficiency of qPCR species-specific assays targeted at the species known to be present in Australian and New Zealand waters, A. catenella, A. pacificum, A. ostenfeldii, and for the first time A. australiense. For the A. catenella and A. pacificum assays, the specificity and sensitivity were compared to previously published assays. The performance of the qPCR species-specific assays in relation to light microscopy cell and cyst counts was also assessed, to explore the possibility of using this assay for the detection of sediment cysts.

Materials and Methods

Alexandrium Culture Conditions

Alexandrium cultures were grown at 35 PSU (Practical Salinity Unit) salinity, light was provided on a 12 h/1 2h dark/light cycle at a photon irradiance of 100 μmol photons m2s-1 (Table 1). Strains used in this study were provided by the Cawthron Institute Culture Collection of Micro-algae, Australian National Algae Culture Collection, and University of Tasmania (Isolated by Chris Bolch and Miguel de Salas).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Cultures used for this study.

Development of qPCR Assays

Ribosomal sequences from the large subunit 28S of four Alexandrium species were examined for regions of similarity and difference. Comprehensive alignment were assigned for all examined species from all available strains. Regions of similarity were defined by eye. Informative sequence differences were identified based on conserved regions from each species, and primers were designed at these locations. Five sets of primers and probes intended to be specific for each of the five Alexandrium target groups were designed using Geneious R11 software. Probes were labeled with 6 FAM (6-carboxyfluorescein) to the 5′-end of the sequences, and BHQ1 (Black Hole Quencher) was attached to the 3′-end as a quencher (Integrated DNA Technologies, IA, United States).

Cross-reactivity was tested using qPCR carried out on a StepOne Plus Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, United States) platform with the following cycles: 95°C for 10 s and 35 replicates of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 30 s. Each 20 μL reaction contained 10 μL of Itaq Universal Probe mix (Bio-Rad, CA, United States), 0.5 μM of each primers (Table 2), 0.05 μM fluorescence probe, 1 μL template DNA (correspond to 500–1000 cells) 1 μL BSA, and 6 μL PCR-grade water.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Sequence of primers and probes specific to A. catenella, A. pacificum, A. australiense, and A. ostenfeldii.

Primer specificity tests were carried out by running qPCR reactions against DNA templates from A. catenella, A. pacificum, A. australiense, A. minutum, and A. ostenfeldii (Table 3). At the exponential phase, a total of 60,000–75,000 cells were harvested in triplicate by centrifugation using Gyrozen 1580R centrifuge at 1,000 g for 10 min (LaboGene, Bjarkesvej, Denmark). FastDNA Spin kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, United States) was used to extract the DNA from the cultures according to manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were eluted in 80 μl of elution buffer and stored at -20°C until further analysis. The quantity and quality of the DNA was measured by Nanodrop ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, United States).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Specificity of Alexandrium qPCR Assays.

The reaction efficiency of each primer pairs was determined through the slope of the log-linear portion of the cell-based standard curve from one strain from each species. Ten-fold serial dilution of the DNA extracts at a range between 2000 and 0.02 cells for A. catenella, A. pacificum, and A. australiense and between 800 and 0.008 cells for A. ostenfeldii were used to develop the curves. Three replicate DNA extracts from each strain were used to construct the standard curves. The qPCR was carried out as described above.

Test of qPCR Methodology for Cyst Quantification

A van Veen grab (320 mm × 350 mm sampling area) was used to obtain sediment samples in shellfish aquaculture intensive area in Opua Bay, Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand. The grab had a lid that prevented surface sediments being lost on retrieval. Sediment within the grab sample was subsampled with three 60 mm diameter cores from which the top 1 cm was sliced off and pooled to make one composite sample. From this sample, the number of cysts per m2 of sediment in the surface sediments could be calculated. Samples were stored frozen at -20°C after collection as freezing does not affect the integrity of dinoflagellate cysts in sediment samples (Mertens et al., 2012).

Alexandrium pacificum cysts were counted using the fluorescent staining method described by Yamaguchi (Yamaguchi et al., 1995). Briefly, this involved diluting 2 mL of the homogenized sediment sample in tap water, sonicating and prefiltering through an 80 μm mesh to remove larger particulates. The filtrate was washed through a 20 μm screen and the deposit made up to 25 mL. A 5 mL subsample was fixed with 100 μL of glutaraldehyde, centrifuged and the pellet resuspended in 15 mL of methanol and stored at 4°C for a minimum of 4 h (less than 4 h produces variable staining and inaccurate counts). After centrifugation and washing with distilled water, the pellet was stained for 1 h with a 2 mg mL-1 solution of Primuline dye (Sigma-Aldrich 206856-5G). After further washing with distilled water and resuspension in 5 mL of water, a subsample (typically 0.25–0.5 mL) was settled in an Utermöhl chamber and examined under UV light with an inverted microscope. Using this method, the brightly stained A. pacificum cysts contrasted well against the background of other particulate material in the sample and were easily identified and counted.

For qPCR analysis, 50 mg subsamples of sediment were taken for total genomic DNA extractions using Power Soil® DNA isolation kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, United States) following the manufacturer’s protocol. DNA extractions were eluted into 50 μL, quantified using a NanoPhotometer (Implen, Munich, Germany) to check for DNA quantity and quality (260/280 ratio), and stored at -20°C until further analysis.

Cross Depth Quantification of Alexandrium spp

Seawater samples were collected during the peak of an A. catenella bloom in the shellfish farming area on the east coast of Tasmania in Spring Bay and Great Oyster Bay in August 2016 aboard the RV Southern Cross (Figure 2). Seawater samples of 3 L were collected at multiple depths with Niskin bottles on the same location and filtered with 8 μm polycarbonate filters in triplicates and stored at -20°C until the DNA extraction. DNA extraction was then carried out with FastDNA for Soil kit according to manufacturer’s protocol (MP Biomedical, United States) and stored at -20°C until analysis.

One liter of water was stored in Lugol’s iodine at 4°C until Alexandrium cell concentrations were calculated. The samples were settled and total Alexandrium cells were counted using inverted microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).

Bloom Dynamics Comparative Analysis Between Light Microscopy and qPCR

During a bloom of A. pacificum in Opua Bay (Queen Charlotte Sound, the Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand) samples were collected for both light microscope counts and qPCR analysis (Figure 1). Discrete grab samples were collected from 6 m depth. Samples for microscope cell counts (100 mL) were preserved in Lugol’s iodine and a subsample of 10 mL was settled in an Utermöhl chamber and examined with an inverted microscope (CK41, Olympus, Wellington, New Zealand). For qPCR analyses 100 mL of seawater was filtered (Durapore membrane filters, 0.45 μm, Millipore, United States). Genomic DNA was extracted from the filter papers using Power Soil DNA extraction kits as described above. The genomic DNA samples were then analyzed using the A. pacificum qPCR assay as described above. To create a standard curve for the qPCR analyses DNA was extracted from replicate samples of known numbers of cells of the CAWD44 strain of A. pacificum. Cell concentrations of culture were estimated during exponential growth phase using Utermöhl chambers and an inverted microscope. Replicates samples consisting of 150,000 cells were filtered (Durapore membrane filters, 0.45 μm) and extracted using Power Soil DNA extraction kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as described above. These extractions were serially diluted and used to generate a standard curve of known cell number per reaction versus Ct data.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Sediment sampling stations in Queen Charlotte Sound, Marlborough Sounds, New Zealand.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Sample collection points in Great Oyster Bay and Spring Bay, Tasmania.

Results

Alexandrium sp. Species-Specific Assays Specificity Test

In this study, we designed two primer pairs and a probe for A. catenella, and one primer pair and probe each for A. catenella, A. australiense and A. ostenfeldii species (Table 2). The specificity of the assays and previously published assays was tested. Except for a previously published catF/catR assay (Hosoi-Tanabe and Sako, 2005), which positively amplified the strain of A. australiense, all the tested assays were specific to the target species (Table 3).

Further BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Tool) nucleotide analysis of catF/catR primers resulted in 100% match of the reverse primer with A. australiense strain ATCJ33 (KJ879221.1) internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence.

Alexandrium sp. Species-Specific Assays Efficiency Assessment

The amplification efficiency of the assays was measured based on the standard curve slope, developed through serial dilution of DNA extracts from known cell numbers. The reaction efficiencies for all tested assays were higher than 90%. Coefficient of determination of all standard curves were higher than 0.99. The reaction efficiency of the assay targeting A. ostenfeldii was lower than assays specific for A. catenella, A. pacificum, and A. australiense (Figure 3). The limits of detection were 2 cells/L for the A. catenella and A. australiense assays, 2 cells/L and 1 cyst/mg sediment for the A. pacificum assay, and 1 cells/L for the A. ostenfeldii assay.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. (A–D) Standard curves of species-specific assays for Alexandrium spp., presenting the quantification cycle (y-axis) versus the known cell number in log scale (x-axis). (A) A. australiense strain ATNWB01 standard curve. (B) A. catenella strain TRIA-A standard curve. (C) A. pacificum strain CAWD44 standard curve. (D) A. ostenfeldii strain CAWD135 standard curve.

The A. pacificum assay (ACTA-416-F/ACTA-605-R) was tested with DNA extracts from cysts (Figure 4). The efficiency of the reaction was lower when quantifying planktonic cells but sufficiently high (90.53%), and the coefficient of determination was also relatively high (0.8507).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Standard curve presenting the qPCR quantification cycle value (y-axis) versus the diluted number of A. pacificum cysts in log scale.

Comparison Between Light Microscopy and qPCR

The quantity of A. pacificum cysts per gram of sediment samples from the same source were quantified using both light microscopy and qPCR. The coefficient of determination (Pearson R2 = 0.8578) shows a high correlation between the value obtained from light microscopy and qPCR (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Linear regression of A. pacificum cyst quantification from sediments with light microscopy and qPCR.

The cell count using light microscopy was compared with the quantification using qPCR approach in samples from Opua Bay (Figure 6A). The cell number fluctuation observed with the light microscopy and qPCR methods are comparable, especially in low cell number (below 5000). On the date of December 2nd, 2015, about 100 cells were detected using light microscopy and 5.4 × 103 cells were detected with qPCR. On March 2nd, 2016, 1.4 × 104 cells were detected by light microscopy, and 2.4 × 104 cells were detected by qPCR. During times of the highest cell concentration, the qPCR assay detected more cells than light microscopy. The results from the Bland-Altman analysis (Figure 6B) supported this observation, showing less agreement between two methods in the high cell number phase (above 5000 cells/L).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. (A) Correlation of cells quantification with light microscopy (red line) and qPCR method (black line) throughout the A. pacificum bloom in Opua Bay, Marlborough Sound. (B) Bland-Altman measurement of agreement between cell quantification using light microscopy and species-specific qPCR assay.

The cross-depth cell quantification on samples from Spring Bay and Great Oyster Bay, Tasmania, using light microscopy and species-specific qPCR assays suggest that the bloom was dominated by A. catenella (Figures 7A–C). The quantity of cells measured by light microscopy and qPCR appeared to correlate well. Additionally, Bland-Altman analysis of combined Southern Cross samples shows that the differences between two methods are mostly around 500 cells/L, with the plots spread evenly (Figure 7D).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Cross depth cell quantification using species-specific qPCR assays for A. catenella, A. pacificum, and A. australiense, in comparison with total Alexandrium count (A). Great Oyster Bay Site 1 (B) Great Oyster Bay Site 2. (C) Spring Bay Site 3 (D) Bland-Altman measurement of agreement between species-specific A. catenella assays and light microscopy.

Discussion

The co-occurrence of cryptic species of dinoflagellates can lead to difficulties in accurately enumerating the target species, which is necessary in order to establish the ecological factors driving the growth, proliferation and decline of harmful algal blooms. Rapid molecular methods have become a promising solution (Touzet et al., 2009, 2010; Toebe et al., 2013). Currently, the occurrence and seasonality of A. australiense blooms in Australia or elsewhere have never been established. A. australiense can be weakly toxic or non-toxic (Murray et al., 2012), as two of the four strains for which PSTs have been measured have shown very low levels of PSTs. Understanding the bloom dynamics and environmental drivers may potentially reveal the factors underlying intra-species toxicity variation. This study described the first method for determining the abundance of A. australiense, with sensitivity up to one cell and efficiency of 95.63% (Figure 3A). The assay was also specific to this species, when tested against DNA extracts from A. catenella, and A. pacificum and samples.

The specificity test (Table 3) indicated that our A. pacificum assay is more specific when compared to a previously published assay (Hosoi-Tanabe and Sako, 2005). Further BLAST analysis of the primer pair revealed an overlap between A. australiense long subunit sequences with the reverse primer. This shows that we could find not just morphological, but also genetic sequence overlaps in cryptic species, emphasizing the importance of cross-specificity test against species from this complex. All the assays showed high efficiency (Figure 3), and all the assays showed the limit of detection of 2 cells/L for A. catenella, A. pacificum, A. australiense assays, and 2 cells/L for A. ostenfeldii primers. The efficiency of the A. ostenfeldii assay is lower (90.07%), when compared to other tested assays (above 95%). However, it is still between the accepted range (90–100%) (Vandersea et al., 2017).

Cyst are usually found in sediment as dormant cells, and can persist for decades (Anderson et al., 2005). The detection and enumeration of cysts can provide information to determine the potential risk of toxic blooms in a certain area, and possibly the scale of it. Our results strongly indicated that quantification using qPCR is comparable to a widely used auto fluorescence methodology (Yamaguchi et al., 1995). One of the advantages of the qPCR method is its relative simplicity and high-throughput capacity, allowing simultaneous quantification of cysts across different samples. However, phenolic substances and humic acids commonly found in sediment samples could inhibit amplification reactions (Roose-Amsaleg et al., 2001), lowering the efficiency of the qPCR reaction. This is shown by the lower standard curve efficiency when used to quantify diploid cysts compare to haploid planktonic cells (Figures 3C, 4). The extraction protocol we used, and the PCR condition appear to be optimal, as can be shown from the above 90% efficiency (Figure 4).

The assays that we have designed for A. catenella, A. pacificum, and A. australiense were used jointly in order to characterize the species responsible for a bloom event in Tasmania, Australia (Figures 7A–C). In this case, the 2016 bloom on the east coast of Tasmania was dominated by A. catenella, while A. pacificum and A. australiense were also detected in the background. This pattern is consistent with the other samples analyzed in 2015 in the east coast of Tasmania (Hallegraeff et al., 2018). Quantification of an A. pacificum bloom over time suggest that the results of the qPCR assays were comparable to those of the microscope cell count in terms of tracking the patterns over time of the bloom development and collapse (Figure 6A). Nonetheless, we found that the qPCR methods based on rRNA genes overestimated the absolute cell abundance compared to the count using light microscopy (Figures 6A,B). The overestimation of Alexandrium cell abundances using species-specific qPCR assays based on ribosomal RNA genes has been previously reported (Godhe et al., 2007). Ribosomal RNA genes copy number difference across strain can be within orders of magnitude (Galluzzi et al., 2010; Savela et al., 2016). It is possible that the copy number of the strain used for the standard curve were very different to that of the environmental strains. Consequently, the difference was amplified when the cell number increased. Another Bland-Altman analysis of the Tasmanian bloom samples (Figure 7D) shows that there is lesser overestimation when local strain is used for qPCR quantification. Thus, the use of multiple local strains to develop the standard curve may be able to correct the impact of the variation in copy number of the target gene. Alternatively, when species-specific information is not the crucial need for a study, the use of an assay based on functional gene target related to PST synthesis (e.g., sxtA4) (Murray et al., 2011; Gao et al., 2015b; Penna et al., 2015) can be an alternative, as the copy number variation among strains appears to be far less for this gene region than that of rRNA genes (Murray et al., 2011; Savela et al., 2016).

Conclusion

In conclusion, we describe the assay based on qPCR for distinguishing the cryptic species A. australiense from potential co-occurring bloom with morphologically identical species A. pacificum and A. catenella, as well as the toxic species A. ostenfeldii. We show that this method can be used to estimate abundance of these potentially PST-producing dinoflagellates in mixed samples. We have also shown that the methodology can be used to quantify cysts with comparable precision to current microscopy-based method.

Author Contributions

RR, CB, LM, KS, and SM conceived the idea. RR, LM, and KS performed the field sampling and qPCR experiments. CB isolated and maintained part of the culture used in this project. RR, LM, KS, and SM analyzed the data. RR and KS wrote the manuscript sections. All the authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Funding

The provision of A. pacificum plankton and cyst data from the Marlborough Sounds was made possible through funding from the National Science Challenge, Sustainable Seas Innovation Fund (contract C01X1515) and the Seafood Safety Platform (MBIE contract # CAWX1801).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (Project No. 2014/032) for funding. We would also like to thank Miguel de Salas for primer design, Gustaaf Hallegraeff, Sarah Ugalde, Rae Quinlan, and Andreas Seger for the assistance in the field sampling, Gurjeet S. Kohli for assistance with qPCR, and CSIRO for the culture.

References

Ajani, P., Brett, S., Krogh, M., Scanes, P., Webster, G., and Armand, L. (2013). The risk of harmful algal blooms (HABs) in the oyster-growing estuaries of New South Wales, Australia. Environ. Monit. Assess. 185, 5295–5316. doi: 10.1007/s10661-012-2946-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ajani, P., Hallegraef, G. M., and Pritchard, T. (2001). Historic overview of algal blooms in marine and estuarine waters of New South Wales, Australia. Proc. Linn. Soc. NSW 123, 1–22.

Google Scholar

Ajani, P., Ingleton, T., and Pritchard, T. (2011). Microalgal blooms in the coastal waters of New South Wales, Australia. Proc. Linn. Soc. NSW 133, 15–32.

Google Scholar

Anderson, D. M. (1997). Bloom dynamics of toxic Alexandrium species in the northeastern U.S. Limnol. Oceanogr. 42, 1009–1022. doi: 10.4319/lo.1997.42.5_part_2.1009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anderson, D. M., Stock, C. A., Keafer, B. A., Bronzino Nelson, A., Thompson, B., McGillicuddy, D. J., et al. (2005). Alexandrium fundyense cyst dynamics in the Gulf of Maine. Deep Sea Res. Part 2 Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 52, 2522–2542. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2005.06.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Anderson, D. M. G. (1998). “Physiology and bloom dynamics of toxic Alexandrium species, with emphasis on life cycle transitions,” in Physiological Ecology of Harmful Algal Blooms, eds D. M. Anderson, A. Cembella, and G. M. Hallegraeff (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 29–48.

Google Scholar

Aquaculture New Zealand (2012). New Zealand Aquaculture: A Sector Overview with Key Facts, Statistics and Trends. Nelson: Aquaculture New Zealand.

Google Scholar

Bolch, C., Harwood, D. T., Untari, L., Murray, S., Hallegraef, G. M., and Turnbull, A. (2014). “Alexandrium tamarense Group 1 as the cause of PST on the east coast of Tasmania, Australia,” in Proceedings of the 16th ICHA, Wellington.

Google Scholar

Bolch, C. J., and Hallegraeff, G. M. (1990). Dinoflagellate cysts in recent marine sediments from Tasmania, Australia. Bot. Mar. 33, 173–192. doi: 10.1515/botm.1990.33.2.173

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bolch, C. J. S. (1997). The use of sodium polytungstate for the separation and concentration of living dinoflagellate cysts from marine sediments. Phycologia 36, 472–478. doi: 10.2216/i0031-8884-36-6-472.1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bolch, C. J. S., and de Salas, M. F. (2007). A review of the molecular evidence for ballast water introduction of the toxic dinoflagellates Gymnodinium catenatum and the Alexandrium “tamarensis complex” to Australasia. Harmful Algae 6, 465–485. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2006.12.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bravo, I., Figueroa, R. I., Garces, E., Fraga, S., and Massanet, A. (2010). The intricacies of dinoflagellate pellicle cysts: the example of Alexandrium minutum cysts from a bloom-recurrent area (Bay of Baiona, NW Spain). Deep Sea Res. II 57, 166–174. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2009.09.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brown, L., Bresnan, E., Graham, J., Lacaze, J. P., Turrell, E., and Collins, C. (2010). Distribution, diversity and toxin composition of the genus Alexandrium (Dinophyceae) in Scottish waters. Eur. J. Phycol. 45, 375–393. doi: 10.1080/09670262.2010.495164

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dias, J., Muñoz, J., Huisman, J., and McDonald, J. (2015). Biosecurity monitoring of Harmful Algal Bloom (HAB) species in Western Australian waters: first confirmed record of Alexandrium catenella (Dinophyceae). BioInvasions Rec. 4, 233–241. doi: 10.3391/bir.2015.4.4.01

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ebenezer, V., Medlin, L. K., and Ki, J. S. (2012). Molecular detection, quantification, and diversity evaluation of microalgae. Mar. Biotechnol. 14, 129–142. doi: 10.1007/s10126-011-9427-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eckford-Soper, L. K., Bresnan., E., Lacaze, J. P., Green, D. H., and Davidson, K. (2016). The competitive dynamics of toxic Alexandrium fundyense and non-toxic Alexandrium tamarense: the role of temperature. Harmful Algae 53, 135–144. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2015.11.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Erdner, D. L., Percy, L., Keafer, B., Lewis, J., and Anderson, D. M. (2010). A quantitative real-time PCR assay for the identification and enumeration of Alexandrium cysts in marine sediments. Deep Sea Res. Part 2 Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 57, 279–287. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2009.09.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farrell, H., Brett, S., Ajani, P., and Murray, S. (2013). Distribution of the genus Alexandrium (Halim) and paralytic shellfish toxins along the coastline of New South Wales, Australia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 72, 133–145. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.04.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farrell, H., O’Connor, W. A., Seebacher, F., Harwood, T. D., and Murray, S. (2016). Molecular detection of the SxtA gene from saxitoxin-producing Alexandrium minutum in commercial oysters. J. Shellfish Res. 35, 169–177. doi: 10.2983/035.035.0118

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Galluzzi, L., Bertozzini, E., Penna, A., Perini, F., Garces, E., Magnani, et al. (2010). Analysis of rRNA gene content in the Mediterranean dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella and Alexandrium taylori: implications for the quantitative real-time PCR-based monitoring methods. J. Appl. Phycol. 22, 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10811-009-9411-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, Y., Yu, R. C., Chen, J. H., Zhang, Q. C., Kong, F. Z., and Zhou, M. J. (2015a). Distribution of Alexandrium fundyense and A. pacificum (Dinophyceae) in the yellow sea and bohai sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 96, 210–219. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.05.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, Y., Yu, R. C., Murray, S. A., Chen, J. H., Kang, Z. J., Zhang, Q. C., et al. (2015b). High specificity of a quantitative PCR assay targeting a saxitoxin gene for monitoring toxic algae associated with Paralytic Shellfish Toxins in the Yellow Sea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 6973–6981. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00417-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Godhe, A., Cusack, C., Pedersen, J., Andersen, P., Anderson, D. M., Bresnan, E., et al. (2007). Intercalibration of classical and molecular techniques for identification of Alexandrium fundyense (Dinophyceae) and estimation of cell densities. Harmful Algae 6, 56–72. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2006.06.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hackett, J. D., Wisecaver, J. H., Brosnahan, M. L., Kulis, D. M., Anderson, D. M., Bhattacharya, D., et al. (2013). Evolution of saxitoxin synthesis in cyanobacteria and dinoflagellates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 70–78. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss142

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hallegraeff, G., Bolch, C., Campbell, K., Condie, S., Dorantes-Aranda, J., Murray, S., et al. (2018). Improved Understanding of Tasmanian Harmful Algal Blooms and Biotoxin Events to Support Seafood Risk Management. Hobart, TAS: Institute for Marine & Antarctic Studies.

Google Scholar

Hallegraeff, G. M. (1993). A review of harmful algal blooms and their apparent global increase. Phycologia 32, 79–99. doi: 10.2216/i0031-8884-32-2-79.1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hallegraeff, G. M., Bolch, C. J., Blackburn, S. I., and Oshima, Y. (1991). Species of the toxigenic dinoflagellate genus Alexandrium in Southeastern Australian waters. Bot. Mar. 34:575. doi: 10.1515/botm.1991.34.6.575

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Harwood, D. T., Boundy, M., Selwood, A. I., and van Ginkel, R. (2013). Refinement and implementation of the Lawrence method (AOAC 2005.06) in a commercial laboratory: assay performance during an Alexandrium catenella bloom event. Harmful Algae 24, 20–31. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2013.01.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ho, K. C., Lee, T. C. H., Kwok, O. T., and Lee, F. W. F. (2012). Phylogenetic analysis on a strain of Alexandrium tamarense collected from Antarctic Ocean. Harmful Algae 15, 100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2011.12.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hosoi-Tanabe, S., and Sako, Y. (2005). Species-specific detection and quantification of toxic marine dinoflagellates Alexandrium tamarense and A. catenella by Real-time PCR assay. Mar. Biotechnol. 7, 506–514. doi: 10.1007/s10126-004-4128-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

John, U. (2004). Development of specific rRNA probes to distinguish between geographic clades of the Alexandrium tamarense species complex. J. Plankton Res. 27, 199–204. doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbh160

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

John, U., Litaker, R. W., Montresor, M., Murray, S., Brosnahan, M. L., and Anderson, D. M. (2014). Formal revision of the Alexandrium tamarense species complex (Dinophyceae) taxonomy: the introduction of five species with emphasis on molecular-based (rDNA) classification. Protist 165, 779–804. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2014.10.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kamikawa, R., Hosoi-Tanabe, S., Nagai, S., Itakura, S., and Sako, Y. (2005). Development of a quantification assay for the cysts of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Fish Sci. 71, 987–991. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-2906.2005.01055.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lilly, E. L., Halanych, K. M., and Anderson, D. M. (2007). Species boundaries and global biogeography of the Alexandrium tamarense complex (Dinophyceae). J. Phycol. 43, 1329–1338. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00420.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

MacKenzie, L., de Salas, M., Adamson, J., and Beuzenberg, V. (2004). The dinoflagellate genus Alexandrium (Halim) in New Zealand coastal waters: comparative morphology, toxicity and molecular genetics. Harmful Algae 3, 71–92. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2003.09.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mackenzie, L., White, D., Oshima, Y., and Kapa, J. (1996). The resting cyst and toxicity of Alexandrium ostenfeldii (Dinophyceae) in New Zealand. Phycologia 35, 148–155. doi: 10.2216/i0031-8884-35-2-148.1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

MacKenzie, L. A. (2014). The risk to New Zealand shellfish aquaculture from paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins. N. Z. J. Mar. Fresh 48, 430–465. doi: 10.1080/00288330.2014.911191

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McCauley, L. A., Erdner, D. L., Nagai, S., Richlen, M. L., and Anderson, D. M. (2009). Biogeographic analysis of the globally distributed harmful algal bloom species Alexandrium minutum (Dinophyceae) based on rRNA gene sequences and microsatellite markers. J. Phycol. 45, 454–463. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00650.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Medlin, L. K., and Orozco, J. (2017). Molecular techniques for the detection of organisms in aquatic environments, with emphasis on harmful algal bloom species. Sensors 17:1184. doi: 10.3390/s17051184

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mertens, K. N., Rengefors, K., Moestrup,Ø., and Ellegaard, M. (2012). A review of recent freshwater dinoflagellate cysts: taxonomy, phylogeny, ecology and palaeocology. Phycologia 51, 612–619. doi: 10.2216/11-89.1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mobsby, D., and Koduah, A. (2017). Australian Fisheries and Aquaculture Statistics 2016, Fisheries Research and Development Corporation Project 2017-095. Canberra, ACT: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences.

Moore, S. K., Bill, B. D., Hay, L. R., Emenegger, J., Eldred, K. C., Greengrove, C. L., et al. (2015). Factors regulating excystment of Alexandrium in Puget Sound, WA, USA. Harmful Algae 43, 103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2015.01.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Murray, S. A., Wiese, M., Neilan, B. A., Orr, R. J. S., de Salas, M., Brett, S., et al. (2012). A reinvestigation of saxitoxin production and sxtA in the ‘non-toxic’ Alexandrium tamarense Group V clade. Harmful Algae 18, 96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2012.05.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Murray, S. A., Wiese, M., Stuken, A., Brett, S., Kellmann, R., Hallegraeff, G., et al. (2011). sxtA-based quantitative molecular assay to identify saxitoxin-producing harmful algal blooms in marine waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 7050–7057. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05308-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Orr, R. J. S., Stüken, A., Rundberget, T., and Eikrem, W. (2011). Improved phylogenetic resolution of toxic and non-toxic Alexandrium strains using a concatenated rDNA approach. Harmful Algae 10, 676–688. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2011.05.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Penna, A., Fraga, S., Maso, M., Giacobbe, M. G., Bravo, I., Garces, E., et al. (2008). Phylogenetic relationships among the Mediterranean Alexandrium (Dinophyceae) species based on sequences of 5.8S gene and Internal Transcript Spacers of the rRNA operon. Eur. J. Phycol. 43, 163–178. doi: 10.1080/09670260701783730

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Penna, A., and Galluzzi, L. (2013). The quantitative real-time PCR applications in the monitoring of marine harmful algal bloom (HAB) species. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 20, 6851–6862. doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-1377-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Penna, A., Perini, F., Dell’Aversano, C., Capellacci, S., Tartaglione, L., Giacobbe, M. G., et al. (2015). The sxt gene and paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins as markers for the monitoring of toxic Alexandrium species blooms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 14230–14238. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03298

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prud’homme, and van Reine, W. F. (2017). Report of the nomenclature committee for algae: 15. Taxon 66, 191–192. doi: 10.12705/661.16

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rhodes, L. L., and Mackenzie, A. L. (2001). Harmful algae and mariculture in New Zealand. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 58, 398–403. doi: 10.1006/jmsc.2000.1023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roose-Amsaleg, C. L., Garnier-Sillam, E., and Harry, M. (2001). Extraction and purification of microbial DNA from soil and sediment samples. Appl. Soil Ecol. 18, 47–60. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393(01)00149-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salgado, P., Riobo, P., Rodriguez, F., Franco, J. M., and Bravo, I. (2015). Differences in the toxin profiles of Alexandrium ostenfeldii (Dinophyceae) strains isolated from different geographic origins: evidence of paralytic toxin, spirolide, and gymnodimine. Toxicon 103, 85–98. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2015.06.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Savela, H., Harju, K., Spoof, L., Lindehoff, E., Meriluoto, J., Vehniainen, M., et al. (2016). Quantity of the dinoflagellate sxtA4 gene and cell density correlates with paralytic shellfish toxin production in Alexandrium ostenfeldii blooms. Harmful Algae 52, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2015.10.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scholin, C. A., Herzog, M., Sogin, M., and Anderson, D. M. (1994). Identification of group- and strain-specific genetic markers for globally distributed Alexandrium (Dinophyceae).II. Sequence analysis of a fragment of the LSU rRNA gene. J. Phycol. 30, 999–1011. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1994.00999

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shin, H. H., Li, Z., Kim, E. S., Park, J. W., and Lim, W. A. (2017). Which species, Alexandrium catenella (Group I) of A. pacificum (Group IV), is really responsible for past paralytic shellfish poisoning outbreaks in Jinhae-Masan Bay, Korea ? Harmful Algae 68, 31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2017.07.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Toebe, K., Alpermann, T. J., Tillmann, U., Krock, B., Cembella, A., and John, U. (2013). Molecular discrimination of toxic and non-toxic Alexandrium species (Dinophyta) in natural phytoplankton assemblages from the Scottish coast of the North Sea. Eur. J. Phycol. 48, 12–26. doi: 10.1080/09670262.2012.752870

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Touzet, N., Farrell, H., Ní Rathaille, A., Rodriguez, P., Alfonso, A., Botana, L. M., et al. (2010). Dynamics of co-occurring Alexandrium minutum (Global Clade) and A. tamarense (West European) (Dinophyceae) during a summer bloom in Cork Harbour, Ireland (2006). Deep Sea Res Part 2 Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 57, 268–278. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2009.09.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Touzet, N., Keady, E., Raine, R., and Maher, M. (2009). Evaluation of taxa-specific real-time PCR, whole-cell FISH and morphotaxonomy analyses for the detection and quantification of the toxic microalgae Alexandrium minutum (Dinophyceae), Global Clade ribotype. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 67, 329–341. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00627.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Usup, G., Pin, L. C., Ahmad, A., and Teen, L. P. (2002). Alexandrium (Dinophyceae) species in Malaysian waters. Harmful Algae 1, 265–275. doi: 10.1016/S1568-9883(02)00044-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vandersea, M. W., Kibler, S. R., Van Sant, S. B., Tester, P. A., Sullivan, K., Eckert, G., et al. (2017). qPCR assays for Alexandrium fundyense and A. ostenfeldii (Dinophyceae) identified from Alaskan waters and a review of species-specific Alexandrium molecular assays. Phycologia 56, 303–320. doi: 10.2216/16-41.1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yamaguchi, M., Itakura, S., Imai, I., and Ishida, Y. (1995). A rapid and precise technique for enumeration of resting cysts of Alexandrium spp. (Dinophyceae) in natural sediments. Phycologia 34, 207–214. doi: 10.2216/i0031-8884-34-3-207.1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: paralytic shellfish toxin, Alexandrium, qPCR, ribosomal DNA, Dinoflagellate cysts

Citation: Ruvindy R, Bolch CJ, MacKenzie L, Smith KF and Murray SA (2018) qPCR Assays for the Detection and Quantification of Multiple Paralytic Shellfish Toxin-Producing Species of Alexandrium. Front. Microbiol. 9:3153. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03153

Received: 23 August 2018; Accepted: 05 December 2018;
Published: 18 December 2018.

Edited by:

Senjie Lin, University of Connecticut, United States

Reviewed by:

Samuel Cirés, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain
Brendan Paul Burns, The University of New South Wales, Australia
Deana Erdner, The University of Texas at Austin, United States

Copyright © 2018 Ruvindy, Bolch, MacKenzie, Smith and Murray. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Rendy Ruvindy, rendy.ruvindy@uts.edu.au; r.ruvindy@gmail.com Shauna A. Murray, shauna.murray@uts.edu.au